Untitled

License
Agreement
By opening and using these SHRM Learning System for SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP student materials (the “Materials”), the user
(“User”) hereby agrees as follows:
i. That the Society for Human Resource Management is the exclusive copyright owner of the Materials.
ii. Provided that the required fee for use of the Materials by User has been paid to SHRM or its agent, User has the right, by
this License, to use the Materials solely for his/her own educational use.
iii. User has no right to print or make any copies, in any media, of the materials, or to sell, or sublicense, loan, or otherwise
convey or distribute these materials or any copies thereof in any media.
Acknowledgments
SHRM acknowledges the contributions of its volunteer leaders and staff members who have served as subject
matter experts for the SHRM Learning System for SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP.
Subject matter experts

Dennis Carr, MSIR, SHRM-SCP
Chief Human Resource Officer, Lane Community College
Eugene, Oregon, U.S.
Ed Hasan, EdD, MBA, SHRM-SCP, SPHR

CEO and Managing Partner, Kaizen Human Capital
Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University
Jennifer C. Loftus, MBA, SHRM-SCP, GPHR, SPHR, PHRca, CCP, CBP, GRP
National Director, Astron Solutions
New York, New York, U.S.
Past subject matter experts

Brad Boyson, CHRP, HRBP, HRMP, SPHR, GPHR
Executive Director, SHRM MEA
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Todd Brodie, PhD., SHRM-SCP, CHRP, FCIPD

Principal Consultant—Global HR and Leadership Development, caïd associates
Orlando, Florida, U.S.
Paul Chiames, SPHR

Chief Human Resources Officer, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory)
Palo Alto, California, U.S.
Joanne Lee, SHRM-SCP

Vice President, Human Resources, N.K.S. Distributors, Inc.
Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.
Partika Raj Malhotra, B.A., Psychology; Postgraduate, Human Resources; SHRM-SCP

Head Learning and Talent Development, Tanfeeth
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Tom O’Connor, JD, GPHR, SHRM-SCP, SPHRi

HR Consultant
Andover, Massachusetts, U.S.
Lance J. Richards
Speaker and Author in Global Workforce Strategy, redcliffpartners, llc
Detroit, Michigan, U.S.
Robert Robinson, SCP, SPHR, GPHR, Chartered Member CIPD

Training Manager, Middle East, SHRM
David S. Twitchell, SHRM-SCP, CCP, CBP, PHR

Vice President, Human Resources, Catholic Charities New Hampshire
Manchester, New Hampshire, U.S.
Christine V. Walters, MAS, JD, SHRM-SCP, SPHR

Independent Consultant
FiveL Company
Westminster, Maryland, U.S.
Nina E. Woodard, SPHR, GPHR

President and Chief 'N' Sights Officer, Nina E. Woodard & Associates
Oceanside, California, U.S.
Alejandro Zeballos, GPHR, PMP

Americas Training Lead, Accenture
Santiago, Chile
Legal compliance
Margaret Matejkovic, Esq.
Of Counsel, Kastner Westman & Wilkins, LLC
Akron, Ohio, U.S.
Travis Teare, Esq.

Associate, Kastner Westman & Wilkins, LLC
Akron, Ohio, U.S.
Introduction to Organization Domain
This domain in the SHRM Learning System® for SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP includes five Functional Areas: Structure of the
HR Function, Organizational Effectiveness and Development, Workforce Management, Employee and Labor Relations,
and Technology Management.
Throughout the module, brief scenarios, titled “Competency Connection,” describe how the Behavioral Competencies
listed in the SHRM Body of Competency and Knowledge™ apply to the Functional Area under discussion.
While this module includes legal content, it should not be construed as legal advice or as pertaining to specific factual
situations. No general statement of law, no matter how seemingly simple, can be applied to any particular factual situation
without a full, careful, and confidential analysis of all relevant facts, the employer’s policies and practices, and the
applicable laws of the jurisdiction(s) in which the employer operates.
Key Content
The content in the domain accounts for 17% of the SHRM-CP and SHRM-SCP exams.
Functional Area #6: Structure of the HR Function
Structure of the HR Function encompasses the people, processes, theories, and activities involved in the
delivery of HR-related services that create and drive organizational effectiveness.
Proficiency Indicators:
Proficiency indicators for all HR professionals include:
Adapts work style to fit the organization’s HR service model (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized), to ensure timely and
consistent delivery of services to stakeholders.
Seeks feedback from stakeholders to identify opportunities for HR function improvements.
Acts as HR point-of-service contact for key stakeholders within a division or group.
Provides consultation on HR issues to all levels of leadership and management.
Coordinates with other HR functions to ensure timely and consistent delivery of services to stakeholders.
Ensures that outsourced and/or automated HR functions are integrated with other HR activities.
Analyzes and interprets key performance indicators to understand the effectiveness of the HR function.
Proficiency indicators for advanced HR professionals include:

Designs and implements the appropriate HR service model for the organization (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized),
to ensure efficient and effective delivery of services to stakeholders.
Creates long-term goals that address feedback from stakeholders identifying opportunities for HR function
improvements.
Ensures that all elements of the HR function (e.g., recruiting, talent management, compensation and benefits,
learning and development) are aligned and integrated, and provide timely and consistent delivery of services to
stakeholders.
Identifies opportunities to improve HR operations by outsourcing work or implementing technologies that automate
HR functions (e.g., time, payroll).
Designs and oversees programs to collect, analyze, and interpret key performance indicators (e.g., balanced
scorecard) to evaluate the effectiveness of HR activities in supporting organizational success.
Key Concepts:
Approaches to HR operational integration (i.e., how HR structures work together).
Approaches to HR function/service models (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized).
Approaches to HR structural models (e.g., Center of Excellence [COE], shared services).
Elements of the HR function (e.g., recruiting, talent management, compensation, benefits).
HR-function metrics (e.g., HR staff per full-time employee, customer satisfaction, key performance indicators,
balanced scorecard).
HR staff roles, responsibilities, and functions (e.g., generalists, specialists, HR business partners).
Outsourcing of HR functions.
Structure of the HR Function
Structure of the HR Function is about the way HR organizes its assets to provide services to internal business partners in
a way that aligns with the organization’s own structure and strategy. The structural model HR leaders choose balances
efficiency with quality of customer service and consistency with adaptability.
To do this, HR professionals must understand the structure of their own organizations—their parts, their business goals
and cultures, the ways in which they are coordinated to produce value to the organization. The organization may be large
and multi-layered. It may be geographically dispersed and culturally diverse. HR professionals must understand the
business goals and service expectations of their fellow stakeholders in the organization and apply creativity to
collaborating with these stakeholders.
Equipped with a knowledge of its own capabilities and its stakeholders’ needs, the HR function can choose an appropriate
structure. Key decisions are the location of HR services and the level of control over HR policies and practices. Should
assets and services be located within a headquarters or embedded in the divisions of the organization? How will HR
develop and implement policies? Will HR headquarters control all decisions, or will satellite HR functions be allowed to
adapt policies to local needs?
HR leaders must also measure the effectiveness of the services HR delivers and commit to making structural changes that
can correct and improve its customer service and align it with changed strategy or environmental conditions.
Role of HR
Proficiency indicators related to this section include:

Key concepts related to this section include:

Elements of the HR function (e.g., recruiting, talent management, compensation, benefits).
Role of HR
HR’s focus will always be people: acquiring, developing, and retaining talent. The roles that HR plays in today’s
organizations are complex, however. They include administrative and operational tasks and also more strategically
oriented activities. This complex role requires the competencies of a professional.
Competency Connection
The essential role of HR is to provide value to the organization through the application of HR expertise. A newly certified
HR professional was able to put the HR Behavioral Competencies to work quickly in her new position.
The HR professional was hired to support a growing company with about 80 employees. The company had no HR
department.
The HR professional was nervous to jump into her workforce management, recruitment, development, and consultation
roles but decided to begin by learning about the company’s structure, chain of command, policies, and goals. Then she
performed a gap analysis, evaluating current resources against the business’s needs and identifying deficiencies.
She chose to tackle a specific task first: figuring out a time-capturing system to align with the current payroll system. She
researched time-capturing systems, compared them, and made a thoughtful decision. She was able to launch a cost-
effective electronic time sheet system within two months. It helped to improve payroll accuracy and employee
accountability. Efficiency grew tremendously.
In delivering value, the HR professional approached her position as a consultant to the organization—seeing a problem
and designing and implementing necessary changes, thereby helping the organization improve its effectiveness and
efficiency. Her Critical Evaluation skills were indispensable as well.
Strategic Role of HR
HR processes and activities must be aligned with the organization’s overall strategy and business partners’ needs to
create a stronger and more strategically focused organization.
HR’s strategic role includes:
Participation in creating the organization’s strategy. This requires HR practitioners to broaden their focus to
include global, long-term, and forward-thinking considerations. As an organization seeks new opportunities, HR
provides a valuable perspective on the human factors inherent in any strategic decision. Its contributions may
include activities such as:
Providing current information about the organization’s human capital.
Identifying the implications of the strategy across functions.
Applying knowledge of external forces that can affect the strategy.
Communicating information about workforce planning and management that will be necessary to implement the
strategy.
Aligning the HR strategy with the organization’s strategy. For example:

Preparing the organization for change.
Forecasting human capital needs and the skills and knowledge required to achieve strategic goals.
Increasing organizational effectiveness through appropriate strategies, such as organizational restructuring and
cultural alignment.
Developing talent through, for example, performance management, career development, and succession planning.
Supporting other functions in their strategic roles. For example:

Assisting in identifying new skill requirements.
Acquiring and retaining talent.
Supporting succession planning and mentoring projects.
This strategic role shapes HR’s administrative and operational roles.
Administrative Role of HR
The HR focus in this role is twofold: managing compliance issues and record keeping. Often referred to as “transactional
activities,” these responsibilities continue to be central to the HR function, but they can be performed in a strategic
manner.
Using technology to capture and analyze data. Technology, such as human resource information systems (HRIS),
facilitates the integration of HR in strategic management by providing information that can drive HR’s role as a
consultant to the organization’s leaders. HR data can be integrated into an enterprise management tool that enables
more timely access to shared data throughout the organization. This also allows HR to analyze data, identify issues
and developing trends, and begin planning.
Using technology to reduce transactional time. HRIS manage HR data (e.g., employee records) and create
compliance reports. HR and management software applications (e.g., applicant tracking software, project
management) increase productivity. In many organizations, managers and employees can complete their own
transactions (e.g., updating records, changing benefits) through self-service portals.
Focusing on core capabilities. Tasks that are low in strategic value and are not necessarily considered core HR
functions can be outsourced to allow HR to focus on strategic activities. Third-party vendors can provide benefit plan
administration, payroll administration, background checks, and other less strategic tasks. This means, however, that
HR professionals must develop skills and knowledge associated with outsourcing, such as negotiating and
performing due diligence and monitoring and correcting vendor performance.
Operational Role of HR
Many HR activities—recruiting and hiring, resolution of employment issues, employee communication—attend to the day-
to-day management of people. In addition, HR is called upon to interact with line managers, consulting on specific issues
and providing advice on improving performance, productivity, and job satisfaction. This often requires HR to develop
performance assessment and improvement processes and design effective reward systems.
HR can transform these operational activities by aligning them with the organization’s strategic objectives:
Knowledge management can help the organization capture and share the wisdom and experience of all its
members. In addition, HR can show leaders what and where talent and specialized knowledge reside in the
organization so that it can be deployed toward attaining strategic objectives. This is especially important in large and
diverse organizations.
Targeted talent acquisition and development focus on bringing the organization closer to its goals. For example,
HR can use data and its organizational skills (e.g., job analysis, consultative skills) to identify potential disconnects
between current job descriptions and actual job competencies.
Incentive systems can be designed to promote rather than discourage desired behavior—e.g., rewarding increased
customer satisfaction rather than decreased call time; rewarding the size of single sales rather than the number of
smaller sales.
Employee engagement programs target increased productivity and retention—perhaps by improving supervisory
skills or promoting a change in leadership model from directing to leading an empowered team.
Developing an HR Service Culture

HR’s roles in the organization can be performed more effectively if the HR function develops an internal “service culture.”
In the same way that organizations must be mindful of the external customers who use their products and services, HR
must develop an outward-focused culture—a sense that HR activities are more than transactions, that HR is part of the
system that is the organization, that the quality it delivers to its internal customers enables the organization to satisfy its
external customers.
Imagine that HR is asked to conduct an organizational development intervention with itself. What changes would be
needed to create an HR customer-driven culture?
The most complete answer can follow a common tool used in organizational development, the McKinsey 7-S framework.
This model describes organizations as having seven interconnected elements. Each of these elements must be
considered in creating sustainable organizational change:
Strategy. A customer-centric culture is a necessary part of HR’s attempt to create value for the organization. The
strategy provides a plan for creating this value, and it should incorporate input from members throughout the HR
organization.
Shared values. HR leaders communicate to function members a commitment to quality performance and customer
service. The message must be explicit; it must be communicated through various media and at meaningful times,
such as during onboarding and at regular meetings and individual performance meetings.
Structure. HR leaders must take steps to change HR’s structure if it slows or prevents HR professionals from
delivering quality work to their customers. This can involve empowering HR professionals to make changes to meet
customer needs and to correct mistakes quickly. It may involve creating a position or group to continually assess
customers’ perceptions of HR service.
Systems. Systems support the way people do their jobs. Systems can include a variety of tools, policies, and
processes.To improve customer service, HR leaders implement processes to improve the customer relationship:
HR may implement software tools to support service delivery, such as issue tracking software that shares
information and progress on resolving an issue with other HR professionals and HR customers.
Customer satisfaction surveys are another type of system, inviting internal customer assessment of HR
product/service quality—how well the products/services meet promises and expectations.
The concept of quality and customer service is included in HR job descriptions and the performance management
process.
Customer service is also a key criterion when outsourcing HR services and monitoring suppliers’ performance.
Key Content
To deliver better service, HR may implement a process of meeting periodically with internal customers to understand
their current needs accurately and completely. As a result of these meetings, HR may establish service-level
agreements with customers. A service-level agreement (SLA) defines the output customers can expect—for
example, the services HR will provide a function (e.g., self-service portals, dispute resolution), the normal time frames
for results (e.g., in filling job openings), or HR responsiveness to customer queries and complaints (e.g., quickly
correcting errors in pay or benefits).
Staff. Ability to deliver customer service is a criterion for selecting HR professionals. HR professionals are rewarded
and recognized for exceptional acts of customer service.
Skills. HR leaders undertake to assess the competencies among HR staff to deliver quality customer service and to
address gaps through training and development (e.g., training in communication, conflict resolution).
Style of leadership. Leaders must model in all their actions the values they have identified for the HR organization
—for example, supporting customer focus even when it may require additional resources. They must be willing to
invite HR employees to participate in problem solving and decision making.
HR’s Internal Stakeholders

HR’s Internal Stakeholders
Understanding the perspectives, challenges, and objectives of internal stakeholders is essential to HR’s role as a strategic
business partner within the organization. This awareness allows HR professionals to identify ways in which HR processes
and abilities can be used to help other functions achieve their strategic objectives and plans and, in that way, strengthen
the organization’s strategic posture. In doing this, HR also demonstrates its value to its stakeholders and strengthens
relationships throughout the organization.
The HR leader of a consumer products company has been involved in the design and implementation of a new
organizational design structure that involves a significant change in centralizing common engineering resources that had
previously been dispersed across multiple operating divisions. This new central resource, which would define common
design processes and their deployment, would use a matrix structure to assign engineers to different divisions. HR must
get division leaders who previously had full control of their engineering resources to support the centralized engineering
resource design.
As changes like this begin, tension levels and doubt will be high. HR professionals can apply their Relationship
Management competency to identify and defuse possible conflicts.
The HR leader meets individually with the division heads representing product design, manufacturing, and packaging and
the new head of the centralized engineering function to surface specific personal concerns (those that would inhibit
accomplishing the operating goals) and organizational concerns (the practicality of making this work). The HR leader
summarizes all inputs, identifies and surfaces legitimate operating concerns, and designs a process to alleviate individual
concerns.
HR then conducts one-on-one meetings and facilitates a group design and decision-making process to collectively identify
operating guidelines and determine service-level agreements between the shared engineering resource and each division.
This effort allows:
Division leaders to surface reservations and identify risk management plans to address their concerns that they can
share with the engineering division.
Definition of how required engineering resources will be requested and made available in a timely manner.
Determination of service-level agreements to set expectations for service quality and measurement.
Identification of a conflict resolution process for issues that arise after implementation.
The HR leader demonstrates the ability to manage interactions with key stakeholders and provide appropriate
recommendations and solutions based on in-depth organizational knowledge and expertise by:
Promoting successful relationships with stakeholders.
Managing internal and external relationships in ways that promote the best interests of all parties.
Championing the view that organizational effectiveness benefits all stakeholders.
Negotiating with internal and external stakeholders to advance the interests of the organization.
Fostering a culture that supports intraorganizational relationships.
Fostering effective team building among stakeholders.
Designing strategic opportunities and venues for building employee networks and relationships.
HR and the Organization’s Core Functions
All organizations include certain core functions—to a greater or lesser extent, depending on the size and nature of the
organization. These core business functions are illustrated in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1:
Core
Business
Functions
Key Content
Organizations today realize that the most effective strategies are not driven by a single function, such as marketing/sales or
operations, but are produced by cross-functional collaboration. Because it participates in the strategic planning process for
the organization, HR understands the value the organization is trying to generate and the role each function plays in
producing that value.
Because its mission as a core function is to deliver the talent and services required by the other functions, HR also
understands the specific challenges each function faces. As a result, HR is well positioned to serve as a cross-functional
bridge. It can:
Facilitate the high degree of cross-functional understanding and collaboration required to deliver results.
Use its mission to advise core functions on how to align with the organization’s strategy and the best ways to elevate
organizational performance.
Identify and support the need for additional resources or training.
Deliver necessary talent throughout the organization.
Exhibit 2 summarizes the information about HR and its core business partners.
Exhibit 2: Cross-Functional Relationships with HR
Cross-Functional Relationships with HR
Executive Recruiting executive candidates in highly Recruiting and training

management competitive markets members for board of directors
and board of Negotiating attractive compensation Consulting on strategic issues
directors packages that are responsible and comply such as talent management,
with regulatory restrictions organizational effectiveness, or
culture
Finance and Coordinating requirements of different Providing training related to
accounting markets in terms of currency, taxation, good governance to board
benefits, reporting members or on compliance
Collaborating on start-up operations requirements with internal
(examples include setting up accounts, filing auditing
necessary documents) Selecting an external auditor
Collaborating on ways to manage costs of Promoting inclusion of ethical
benefit programs and reduce tax burdens for dimensions in enterprise value
global assignees system and fostering ethical
environment throughout the
organization
Marketing and Aligning incentive/compensation programs Promoting sharing of learning
sales with strategies and local cultures and through Internet or intranet
practices technology
Managing staffing Supporting teams in which
Coordinating knowledge management in marketing plays a key role
different markets (for example, ensuring that
product training is available in different
languages)
Research and Developing talent pool with requisite Promoting processes that allow
development expertise (including employees with up-to- R&D personnel to devote more
date knowledge and skills) time to the task of innovation
Identifying employees with needed skills Identifying alliance or joint
throughout the organization venture partners, acquisitions,
Selecting members for global teams and or vendors to supply critical
building highly functioning teams elements
Promoting a climate that values innovation Ensuring security of patents

and continuous improvement and intellectual property
Operations Developing staffing plans Ensuring physical security of

Managing labor relations in different markets operations
Dealing with intellectual property rights Coordinating with local legal,

regulatory, and cultural
requirements
Information Selecting the HR information system and Using Internet and extranet to
technology implementing it foster better communication,
Using database analysis to support decision knowledge sharing, and
making and strategic initiatives coordination among internal
and external stakeholders
Executive Management
Executive management (often referred to as the C-suite) is ultimately responsible for all of the core business functions and
their effect on the organization’s performance. The primary responsibilities of executive management are to:
Develop and communicate strategy to the organization’s components.
Monitor and control implementation of strategic and operational activities through control of financial resources.
Be the primary interface with the organization’s stakeholders, from investors and regulators to customers and
communities.
Lead the organization through a shared vision and the values they model in all interactions.
Executive management commonly includes an individual who holds ultimate control of organizational resources and
responsibility. Titles vary—e.g., chief executive officer (CEO), president, or executive/managing director. In a publicly held
company, this individual may report to a board of directors, compensated individuals from outside the organization.
(Nonprofit organizations may also have boards whose members are compensated for expenses.) The board is responsible
for reviewing and approving strategic plans, appointing and approving compensation of executive management, and
overseeing organizational governance.
The heads of the organization’s financial operations and day-to-day operations are also at the executive level. According
to an organization’s mission and values, there may be other positions in executive management, such as heads of
information, innovation, or risk management. Some of these positions may be “double-hatted”—they may be held by
someone in the organization in addition to that person’s primary responsibilities.
How HR Interacts with Executive Management

HR leadership interacts directly with executive management. HR contributes to the development of organizational strategy,
advising on the human capital implications of strategic decisions. It may work directly with the board to advise on
executive compensation and matters of governance and with other members of the C-suite as they manage the
development and implementation of operations and strategic initiatives.
Finance and Accounting Functions

Finance and accounting both reflect an interest in an organization’s financial performance, although the functions play
different roles.
Finance focuses on how the organization uses its financial assets to operate in the short and long term. Finance activities
include:
Supporting operations and strategic initiatives through the creation and monitoring of operating and capital
expenditure budgets.
Providing financial analysis used in strategic planning. For example, finance is involved in decisions regarding global
expansion, technology investments, and structuring strategic alliances.
Managing the organization’s “treasury” through short- and long-term investments and borrowing.
Accounting focuses on tracking financial transactions and reporting financial information to finance (to support its strategic
planning and management decisions) and to external stakeholders (to support compliance and demonstrate governance).
Accounting activities include:
Tracking revenue and expenses through accounting. Accounting procedures must comply with applicable standards,
such as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) in the U.S.
Supporting governance by maintaining records of finances and arranging periodic audits. The internal auditing
function often resides within accounting.
Producing financial statements, such as the income or P&L statement,
Complying with financial requirements and reporting information to government agencies (e.g., for taxes), regulatory
bodies overseeing publicly traded companies, and investors/stockholders. Public interest has demanded greater
transparency of fiduciary responsibilities and actions and greater accuracy and completeness of financial reports. A
number of countries now have laws requiring varying degrees of corporate governance.
The finance and accounting functions are challenged by changes in laws and regulations, new technology that affects
processes and creates new vulnerabilities, and changes in workplace ethics that make fraudulent behavior and abuse of
fiduciary responsibilities more common.
How HR Interacts with Finance and Accounting

HR depends on finance and accounting for everything it does or would like to do. HR works with finance and accounting to
plan and monitor annual functional and special project budgets and to manage relationships with suppliers. This internal
customer is especially interested in governance. HR can help provide governance and ethics training to board members
and employees, participate in risk prevention programs (e.g., screening job applicants, fraud investigations), and support
the conduct of external and internal audits.
Marketing and Sales Functions
This is the part of the organization that brings in revenue. Depending on the organization, these functions may be
separated into two equal areas or one may be included as a sub-function inside the other.
Marketing is responsible for positioning (marketing) and selling products and services (sales) to customers. The
responsibility of marketing is often described as managing the 4 Ps: price, product, promotion, and place. Consequently,
marketing usually has the best intelligence about and the highest awareness of customers, market needs, and competitive
threats. For global companies, this may mean balancing the advantages of a brand identity and a global marketing
strategy with local preferences and needs.
Marketing strategies are often characterized as “push” or “pull”:

A “push” strategy focuses on getting products/services in front of customers. For example, companies may have
showrooms or create a strong point-of-sales presence at the retail level.
A “pull” strategy attracts customers to the product. An example of this is the carbonated drinks industry, which
invests heavily in advertising and promotion to create brands and boost sales.
The sales strategy and its workforce characteristics are heavily influenced by an industry’s customary distribution practices
and the company’s marketing strategy. Some companies may sell to consumers (B2C, or business to consumer) or to
businesses (B2B, or business to business). They may sell directly (through their own sales forces or a sales force shared
with a strategic partner) or indirectly (through distributors who sell to retailers, agents, or representatives). The
organization’s sales strategy affects its human resource needs, including talent acquisition and compensation.
How HR Supports Marketing and Sales

Marketing’s work focuses on the creation of brand identity. HR can ensure that its activities are aligned with the identity
that marketing is creating and use this brand identity to attract future employees. HR can collaborate with marketing in
creating teams and team cultures that embody brand characteristics (e.g., customer service, awareness of and use of
cutting-edge technologies).
Sales may look to HR to design compensation systems that motivate sales behavior and to provide skills and knowledge
training.
Research and Development Function

In a commercial enterprise, research and development (R&D) or new product design and development is responsible for
future revenue. Investment in R&D will vary by industry. When an organization’s primary value is created through
intellectual property, R&D is a logical investment. In the past decade, the leaders in R&D investment have been in the
computing and electronics, health care, software and Internet systems, and industrial sectors.
R&D also exists in the public sector, in the form of national research institutes or centers associated with universities.
Public-interest R&D often focuses on performing theoretical research (as opposed to applied research), promoting science
and new technologies, performing public-interest scientific research (such as research into public health issues), and
developing sustainable technologies.
Some organizations conduct R&D in a centralized manner (for example, with a globalized strategy), while others focus
R&D in business units so that projects stay focused on customer needs.
R&D spending is not directly related to levels of innovation and performance. “The 2018 Global Innovation 1000 Study”
(conducted by PwC’s strategy consulting division, Strategy&) noted that, when one considered three financial performance
metrics (revenue growth; earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation, or EBITDA; and market capitalization growth),
the top ten innovators outperformed the top ten R&D spenders. This may be because these organizations excel at aligning
their investments with their strategy—making sure they focus on highly impactful innovation (e.g., Tesla’s electric car) but
also on retaining the right people, understanding trends, and implementing lean product development.
How HR Supports R&D

R&D thrives on cutting-edge employee skills and knowledge. HR is a partner in sourcing good job candidates and creating
attractive compensation packages. HR’s efforts to create inclusive and diverse cultures are also important to R&D. HR can
protect the organization’s investment in R&D by ensuring that contracts protect intellectual property rights.
HR can consult with R&D on designing processes that support a culture of collaboration and innovation through, for
example, creating career development paths for non-managers, revising job descriptions to reduce bureaucratic burdens
on R&D employees, and designing systems and processes that support agile decision making.
Operations Function
This part of the organization develops, produces, and delivers products and services to customers. The operations
function is responsible for building the products and services that marketing and R&D define and that sales monetizes. It is
therefore the source of the revenue for the enterprise. “Products” can cover a far-ranging spectrum from the tangible
(automobiles) to intangible (software) to services (consulting engagements).
Human resources are an important asset for operations, but the function is often challenged by having a workforce of the
right size at the right time and equipped with the right skills.
Operations is almost always concerned with efficient use of resources, but issues of quality, environmental impact, and
worker health and safety are also important. Operations may need to satisfy standards from customers and regulating
agencies as well as industry and professional standards.
Global organizations may have plants and operations in different countries, with each potentially serving different markets
and customers. In addition, operations departments may be tasked with locating manufacturing in countries with lower
cost structures than the headquarters country. The logistics, planning, and coordination among global operations is
frequently complex and sophisticated.
How HR Supports Operations

Operations managers may have complex workforce planning needs that can be addressed through HR’s ability to analyze
historical data and predict and creatively manage gaps in resources. This includes hiring as well as downsizing. HR
collaborates with operations managers to implement union contracts and advises on managing grievances and discipline
and performance issues in an organized work environment.
Compliance issues are greater in this function, and HR helps prepare managers and supervisors for these responsibilities
and performs many compliance activities, such as delivering and documenting safety training and reporting and
documenting workplace accidents and conditions.
Information Technology Function

The information technology (IT) area manages the storage, access, exchange, and analysis of information across the
enterprise through hardware and software systems. IT often oversees networks used for voice and data communication as
well as hardware components and supports data storage and processing needs throughout the organization.
Increasingly, IT’s major task is to support integration of data from different organizational processes through an enterprise
resource planning (ERP) system. Through integration, IT helps make an organization’s data more visible to decision
makers in real time. ERPs can include different modules according to an organization’s needs:
Financials—examples include the general ledger, an assets register, accounts payable and receivable, and financial
statements.
Management—examples include budgeting and costing.
Operations—examples include inventory management, work flow management, work orders, quality control.
Supply chain management—processes from selection to claims payment.
Customer relationship management—examples include sales account information and activity.
Project management—processes from schedules and budgets to resource tracking.
Human resources—examples include employee records, payroll, benefit programs, training, and performance
management.
IT faces a number of major challenges.
First, IT systems grow over time. This means that some modules may be proprietary while the rest come from an
assortment of vendors. Achieving smooth integration is often difficult or impossible.
Second, IT is charged with maintaining the security and reliability of the organization’s data—an ethical, legal, and
business requirement. Systems must be made secure against internal and external tampering, and IT management must
plan for disasters that could interrupt access to critical data. Failure to secure information can damage an organization’s
reputation and have legal and economic consequences.
Third, IT must manage the information systems for efficiency as well as security. System capacity and function must be
weighed against the benefit of added storage and processing tasks. The Internet has helped in this area by making both
off-site data processing applications and data storage available. Software as a service (SaaS) is a cost-effective way for IT
to support some specialized applications. The vendor is responsible for maintaining the software and the servers on which
it is stored, and the user pays only a subscription fee.
How HR Works with IT

IT supports HR’s technology and consults on HR’s technology projects. HR can assist IT by providing a good pipeline of
qualified employees. In IT’s efforts to manage the organization’s technology risks, HR can develop and communicate
technology policies, such as safeguarding the organization’s networks from unauthorized access.
HR Organization

Ensures that outsourced and/or automated HR functions are integrated with other HR activities.
Adapts work style to fit the organization’s HR service model (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized), to ensure timely and
consistent delivery of services to stakeholders.

Approaches to HR operational integration (i.e., how HR structures work together).
Approaches to HR function/service models (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized).
Approaches to HR structural models (e.g., Center of Excellence [COE], shared services).
HR staff roles, responsibilities, and functions (e.g., generalists, specialists, HR business partners).
Outsourcing of HR functions.
HR Organization
The HR function is designed and structured to serve the strategy of the overall organization as well as the HR strategy.
The structure of HR can take many different forms, depending on the requirements of the organization.
The Consultation competency equips HR professionals to be their organization’s problem solvers—to be proactive in
identifying opportunities to improve the organization’s performance, skilled at listening to leaders and business partners,
and creative in designing solutions. The following example shows how an HR leader uses the principles of structure to
mitigate an organization’s legal risks.
Business leaders at a firm have typically made decisions about corrective action and discipline without consulting HR. This
has resulted in increasing complaints, lawsuits, and settlements. The current HR structure doesn’t align HR business
partners with the organization’s four divisions; rather, it has one employee relations director assigned to all divisions. Aside
from being overwhelmed, the director hasn’t been able to provide applicable training on policies and procedures or
properly investigate incidents across the organization. Thus, management is ill-prepared to make sound decisions.
Senior leaders from each of the divisions have approached the vice president of HR and raised concerns over HR’s
unresponsiveness, management making misaligned decisions, and the overall cost this has brought to their budgets.
After reviewing the current HR structure, roles, and responsibilities—particularly those of the employee relations director—
the vice president of HR immediately decides to align one HR practitioner with each division in order to learn the divisional
structure and team, consult more quickly and more often on all HR issues, and handle routine employee relations matters.
As a result, the employee relations director will be relieved of having to deal with every matter herself. Moreover, this will
allow the director to be more responsive and consultative on critical items and also provide needed employee relations
training to management, thereby ensuring better administration of employee relations and its impact to the organization.
HR Team Members
The composition of the HR team will vary by organization, but the following are the general roles and responsibilities:
Leaders have a strategic role. They are typically part of the organization’s senior leadership team, and, ideally, they
report directly to the chief executive officer (CEO) or chief operating officer (COO). This structure creates the
opportunity for HR to perform its strategic role. HR leaders bring information about strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats to the organization’s strategy to other leaders and participate in the development of overall
strategy. In addition, they develop and direct the strategy, priorities, and focus for their HR team. The leader of the
HR function may have different titles, including chief HR officer (CHRO), HR director, or vice president of HR.
Managers are responsible for units within the HR function, such as employee relations, talent acquisition, and
organizational development. HR managers plan, direct, and coordinate the activities for their unit and provide input
to the leader for HR strategy.
Specialists (also known as functional experts) have expertise in specific areas such as compensation and benefits
design, talent management, metrics, IT, occupational health and safety, organizational development, and workforce
relations. Their role is to apply best practices in their discipline to advance the HR strategy.
Generalists (also known as HR practitioners) are familiar with all of HR’s varied services. Generalists may have
expertise in one or more specialty areas of HR but are generally proficient enough in each area to provide sound
advice and direction to employees and managers. HR generalists work closely with their specialist coworkers to
ensure that the information and programs they are providing to their employees are accurate and complete.
Generalists may also be embedded within countries or business units.
HR business partners are more experienced generalists who are assigned to represent HR services directly to
other business functions. HR business partners use a deeper understanding of the business—both the organization
and the function—to find ways that HR can help functions achieve their goals. This requires many competencies,
including Business Acumen, Consultation, Relationship Management, and Communication. These individuals can be
key to demonstrating HR’s value throughout the organization.
HR Structural Alternatives
The manner in which HR is structured depends on its organization and areas of responsibility. A critical factor is ensuring
that the HR structure is aligned with the organization’s strategic plan.
The advantages and disadvantages of the various alternatives for structuring the HR function are summarized in Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 3: Advantages and Disadvantages of HR Structural Alternatives
Structure Overview Advantages/Disadvantages
Centralized All HR personnel located within Advantages: Provides more control and
HR department; delivers consistency across organization.
services to entire organization. Disadvantages: Can inhibit flexibility and
responsiveness; can decrease effective
communication.
Decentralized HR staff within each function, Advantages: Allows for more direct contact
business unit, or location between HR and other functions and
carrying out required activities. facilitates communication and
responsiveness.
Disadvantages: Lack of consistency among
HR policies and standards.
Functional Headquarters HR is staffed with Advantages: Facilitates consistency
specialists who craft policies. between headquarters policy and practices
HR generalists, who may be and implementation in business units.
located within divisions or other Disadvantages: Can isolate headquarters
locales, implement these HR from business realities perceived by all
policies, adapt them as needed, staff and employees.
and interact with employees.
Dedicated Allows organizations with Advantages: Promotes strategic alignment
different strategies in multiple between headquarters and units.
units to apply HR expertise to Disadvantages: isolation of dedicated HR
each unit’s specific strategic units and loss of shared knowledge and
needs. experience; may lead to duplications and
inefficiencies.
Shared Each business unit can Advantages: Offers expertise efficiently,
services supplement its resources by reducing load of transactional activity in
selecting what it needs from a favor of value-creating activity.
menu of shared HR services Disadvantages: Risks underuse of service
(usually transactional) that the centers when their existence is not widely
units agree to share. known.
Centralized/Decentralized HR
Centralized HR is characterized by having all HR personnel located within the HR department and from there delivering
services to all parts of the organization. Headquarters (or corporate) makes all HR policy and strategy decisions and
coordinates all HR activities and programs. The goal of the centralized structure is to ensure standardized HR policies and
processes throughout the organization. Centralized HR also allows large organizations to create efficiencies in the delivery
of HR services.
In decentralized HR, each part of the organization controls its own HR issues. Strategy and policy may still be made at
headquarters, with HR staff within each function, business unit, or location carrying out the required activities.
For example, a local bank with a small number of branches may have a centralized HR structure, handling all HR issues
for the bank departments and branches from one HR department at the bank’s headquarters. A large heavy equipment
manufacturer with multiple locations in different countries may have a decentralized HR structure. In this case, there would
be a headquarters HR staff but also dedicated HR functions at each location. Decentralizing HR can allow HR to position
itself closer to its internal business partners and create stronger relationships.
Key Content
Centralized HR provides more control and consistency across the organization, but it can also inhibit flexibility and
responsiveness and can decrease effective communication. Decentralized HR allows for more direct contact between HR
and other functions and facilitates communication and responsiveness. The downside can be a lack of consistency among
HR policies and standards. This is especially a challenge for global organizations that would like the economies and clarity
of global HR policies and processes but are aware of the need to adapt to local cultures, laws, and business practices.
Some organizations have hybrid HR structures. For example, learning management may be determined by headquarters,
with the content of the learning being determined at the functional, business unit, or location level.
Functional/Dedicated HR
Another alternative is between a functional or dedicated HR structure. In their book The HR Value Proposition, authors
Dave Ulrich and Wayne Brockbank describe the two alternatives.
In a functional HR organization, headquarters HR is staffed with specialists who craft policies. HR generalists, who may
be located within divisions or other locales, implement these policies, adapt them as needed, and interact with employees.
This type of organization is often found in the least diversified, but not necessarily small, organizations.
A dedicated HR structure allows organizations with different strategies in multiple units to apply HR expertise to each
unit’s specific strategic needs. This is in some ways a “corporatized” HR, with an HR function at headquarters and
separate HR functions located (or “embedded”) in separate business units. Corporate HR articulates basic HR values,
develops tools to be used by the organizational-level HR functions, and creates programs aimed at enhancing global
literacy and leadership skills. The business unit HR staff develops local policies and practices.
Shared Services
Ulrich and Brockbank identify another structural alternative known as the shared services HR model . This model is
frequently used in organizations with multiple business units. Rather than having to develop its own expertise in every
area, each unit can supplement its resources by selecting what it needs from a menu of shared services (usually
transactional) that the units agree to share.
Centers with specific areas of expertise develop HR policies in those areas and then deliver this service to all units. In a
globally integrated enterprise, the centers develop the services at an international or global level and can be located within
the most appropriate unit or country. HR transactional work is thus shared by a network of centers, allowing HR
professionals to spend more time working on strategic or transformational activities that help to generate value.
Common processes folded into shared service centers include payroll, procurement, accounts payable/receivable, travel
expenses, health benefits enrollment, and pension administration. The top four positive outcomes for organizations that
have implemented the shared services concept are:
Reduced staff time spent on administrative tasks.
Reduced administrative costs.
Consolidation of redundant functions.
Better tracking of employee data.
Related—but not identical—to the shared service center is the center of excellence (COE) . Shared service centers
deliver savings and increased productivity by locating similar, more transactional processes in one location. COEs aim at
leveraging strategic expertise in the organization to foster growth and continuous improvement. COEs can be located in a
certain facility but can also be “virtual.” They can take advantage of digital communications to create networks of experts
who can reside anywhere in the organization. COEs in HR might focus on talent acquisition, talent management,
organization development, learning and development, compensation and benefits, and other areas of HR expertise.
Third-Party Contractors
Using third-party contractors is both a structural alternative and a tool HR can use to deploy its own assets with a more
strategic focus. Third-party relationships take the following forms:
Outsourcing , in which a third-party vendor provides selected activities
Cosourcing , in which a third party provides dedicated services to HR, often locating contractors within HR’s
organization
HR activities that are not strategic but are resource-intensive or that require specialized expertise are candidates for
outsourcing or cosourcing. A survey of human resource outsourcing (HRO) companies shows a wide range of outsourcing
options, covering administrative activities, implementation of services, and consultation on specific issues and projects.
For example, HROs can administer or implement:

Payroll.
Employee benefit programs.
Employee self-service centers.
Learning and development systems, including training and knowledge management.
Employee data retention and analytics.
Recruitment programs.
Key Content
Outsourcing can provide cost savings for an organization, but there is a loss of managerial control. Cosourcing can be more
expensive than outsourcing, but there is more managerial control over the contractor.
HR must approach the decision to outsource or cosource strategically. For example, an organization may commit to
increasing the depth of leadership talent at all locations. To ensure that the task is accomplished as quickly and as
effectively as possible, the organization’s HR function may choose to outsource a talent search to one or more consultants
who specialize in this field and who have better access to informal networks of talent sources.
The third-party contractor’s performance objectives must be aligned with the strategic goals of HR and the organization.
The reliability, capacity, and expertise of potential contractors must be confirmed, as well as their ethical character, since
HR retains responsibility for a third-party contractor’s practices and ethical behavior. The agreement should define specific
deliverables and criteria such as conformance with organization policies and service levels.
The Outsourcing Process

To ensure the most appropriate and productive use of outsourcing, HR managers should rely on a thoughtful, well-tested
process. Even when an existing supplier relationship is satisfactory, it is beneficial for the HR organization to consider
other options periodically. This improves transparency in the relationship, but it also helps HR to confirm that the
organization’s needs are being met and to gain perspectives on new approaches and tools. Current suppliers should be
included in the process (unless there have been serious, unresolved performance problems).
Key Content
The outsourcing process includes nine steps:
1. Analyze needs and define goals.
2. Define the budget.
3. Create a request for proposal (RFP).
4. Send RFPs to the chosen contractors.
5. Evaluate contractor proposals.
6. Choose a contractor.
7. Negotiate a contract.
8. Implement the project and monitor the schedule.
9. Evaluate the project.
Analyze Needs and Define Goals.

A thoughtful needs analysis is the most critical stage. Analyzing a project that uses a contractor is not a one-person job. It
requires a multidepartmental team consisting of representatives of all potential users. At this stage, project goals and
expectations are defined.
Example: A project team has been formed to purchase a new human resource information system (HRIS) for an
organization. The team, consisting of members of the HR, accounting, marketing, and information technology
departments, develops a questionnaire to distribute to all potential users of the new system to define the necessary
functions.
The team documents information regarding the current system, for example:
Outputs currently received from the system (required government agency reports, employee records, applicant
tracking, etc.).
User complaints and needs.
Key problems of and constraints on the current system that limit its usefulness.
The questionnaire includes such questions as:

Where should the system be located?
How should the system fit with systems already on site?
What kind of hardware, software, and other components are needed?
What calculations must it be able to perform?
Define the Budget.

If possible, plan for the use of outsourcing resources in your annual budget. Know what can be spent for the outsourced
service and what it costs to provide that service in-house. This information provides a look at the expected financial return
on investment.
Example: The director of HR is analyzing the available resources in the budget for a new HRIS. In doing so,
questions like the following are considered:
What is the budget for planning?
What is the budget for the system?
What is the budget to support the new system when it is operating?
Create a Request for Proposal.

Once the team has reached a decision that outsourcing with a third-party contractor could be beneficial, the next stage is
to prepare a request for proposal (RFP). An RFP is a written request asking contractors to propose solutions and prices
that fit the customer’s requirements. The purpose of an RFP is not only to ensure that responses actually meet the
project’s needs but also to ensure some consistency among responses so that they may be more easily compared.
While RFPs may differ in structure depending on the organization and industry, contractors are usually asked to provide
the following:
Executive summary. Contains a synopsis of the vendor’s product or service and usually includes an understanding
of the client’s needs.
Company information. Provides information on the vendor company’s size, financial stability, business viability, and
experience in the field.
Project team/resources. Explains who will be involved in the project from both the client and vendor companies.
Deliverables. Outlines how the vendor will meet client needs/objectives.
References. Lists previous clients for whom the vendor has performed similar work.
Outlined development process. Includes a detailed description of the project plan, with the objectives, the scope of
the effort, and a time line.
Cost. Lists potential charges and prices for all products and services involved in the project.
Example: The HRIS project team determines the type and depth of information to be provided by each contractor.
Send RFPs to Chosen Contractors.

Once the RFP has been designed, it is sent to selected contractors. Instructions on the manner and date for submission
should be included in the request.
Example: The HRIS project team researches prominent contractors of HRIS systems, narrows the list to five, and
sends them the RFP.
Evaluate Contractor Proposals.
Many variables need to be considered when evaluating a third-party contractor’s proposal. These
variables differ based on the organization’s size, priorities, and industry. See Exhibit 4 for criteria to
consider when selecting a contractor.
Exhibit 4: Factors to Consider When Evaluating Third-Party Contractors
Evaluating a Third-Party Contractor
Scope of resources Company reputation/references

Ability to meet specifications Customization options
Results of site visit Additional value-added capability
Price Previous/existing relationship
Commitment to quality of product and Flexible contract terms
service Location
Schedule Cultural match
Example: The submitted proposals are reviewed by the HRIS project team. In this case, the top three factors under
consideration are 1) ability to meet specifications, 2) customization options, and 3) price. The team also calls the
contractors’ references and then narrows the field to two. These two are asked to make presentations to the project
team.
Choose a Contractor.
When all proposals have been carefully reviewed, it’s time to select a contractor that will meet the organization’s needs.
Example: The HRIS project team chooses a contractor whose system meets 85% of their specifications and who
can customize the remaining 15% into the final product. The price is well within the team’s stated budget.
Negotiate a Contract.
Before the project commences, a written contract that outlines the contractor’s services should be agreed upon. This
contract will describe not only the key deliverables of the project but will include additional information such as
implementation time frames, payment terms, performance standards (including response times), training expectations,
and upgrade costs and responsibilities.
Example: The director of HR and an advisor from the legal department review and negotiate the final contract with
the chosen contractor.
Implement the Project and Monitor the Schedule.

Once the contractor is selected and the contract is approved, the next step is to get the project up and running. First,
conduct an initial project planning meeting to review and refine implementation targets in the project schedule.
Example: The HRIS project team meets with team members from the contractor to finalize the project plan and
implement system development. The system is implemented on schedule and within budget.
Evaluate the Project.

Upon completion of the project, all payment terms are usually settled and the contractor could ask for an evaluation of its
services. This is also the time to conduct an internal evaluation to gather information on how the new system is working
and to develop an ongoing evaluation plan.
Example: During the project planning process, the HRIS project team defined benchmarks that could be used to
evaluate the system once it was implemented—e.g., percentage of errors, number of times support is required. The
team now evaluates the system’s performance and works with the contractor to correct deficiencies. The team
determines that an annual evaluation will be sufficient to plan changes to the system required by legal changes or
changes in compensation and benefits.
Demonstrating the Value of HR

Analyzes and interprets key performance indicators to understand the effectiveness of the HR function.

HR-function metrics (e.g., HR staff per full-time employee, customer satisfaction, key performance indicators,
balanced scorecard).
Demonstrating the Value of HR
Just as the organization must measure and demonstrate the value it is delivering to stakeholders, HR must measure and
demonstrate its value to the entire organization.
The HR professional in this scenario is the head of human resources for a company in the logistics industry in Ghana. She
has a strong background in HR strategic planning and is also an effective generalist. She was able to apply her
experience, expertise, and Behavioral Competencies to a critical personnel problem.
During her first weeks at the company, the HR head completed an HR audit and identified that about 75% of the
employees had a problem with the attitude of the managing director (MD). Employees complained of verbal abuse, often
in public at company social gatherings. The MD also tended to jump to conclusions about the root causes of problems and
then would assign blame. After some few months on the job, the head of HR started experiencing the same issues with
the MD. Complaints continued to come from other employees and the senior management team.
According to exit interviews, the MD’s attitude was causing key employees to resign. On investigation, the HR head
discovered that the average period for which key talent were staying on the job was 14 months. She also looked at the
organizational design and saw that the current structure did not empower employees to execute their responsibilities. The
MD was approving almost every decision in the company.
The HR head scheduled a feedback exercise with the MD. She started by asking the MD why she had been recruited for
the role. The MD reiterated that he needed a professional to drive the human resource agenda to achieve growth. The HR
head asked how the MD perceived the culture of the organization. He responded that he wanted a positive working culture
where people are seen as the company’s greatest asset and also where mistakes are seen as opportunities for growth.
Then the head of HR began to review the findings from the HR audit with the MD. The MD became defensive. The head of
HR calmed him down and urged him to remember his reason for establishing an HR department and engaging an HR
professional to create an enabling working environment. She then reported her research on turnover and noted that,
without some changes in culture and structure, the company would continue to lose key talent and would not achieve the
efficiency it needed.
The HR head engaged the MD every week to review events and complaints from employees and the MD’s experience in
changing his management style. She secured his buy-in to redesign the organizational chart and fully empower line
managers to make specified decisions. The MD could then focus on strategic issues and making his company what he
had envisioned.
This solution required many Behavioral Competencies. The HR head used Critical Evaluation in gathering and analyzing
data, Leadership and Navigation and Relationship Management to have a frank discussion with the MD, and Consultation
and Communication to introduce continuous improvement for the MD and the entire company.
Importance of Measuring HR Performance
Measuring and reporting results has several important benefits for HR:
Reinforcing HR’s role in strategic development by measuring the effectiveness of HR strategies and senior
management’s implementation of those strategies
Identifying opportunities for redirection and improvement through periodic measurement of progress on strategic
objectives
Strengthening HR’s relationship with internal business partners
Supporting future investment in HR programs
The process begins with establishing key performance indicators. HR KPIs are sometimes established by applying a
balanced scorecard approach to the function’s mission. The function then collects data to compare performance with
these KPIs and other metrics. Assessment can include variance analysis of outcomes or results—e.g., variances of
recruiting costs from budget. It can also include assessment of processes—how HR performs its work; whether that
performance meets the function’s mission, values, and goals; and, if needed, how those processes can be improved.
Creating an HR Balanced Scorecard

Balanced scorecards provide a concise yet overall picture of an organization’s performance. They can be used to focus
organizations and functions on key strategic activities, to craft responses to goals, and to create metrics to assess the
effectiveness of these responses. Balanced scorecards help support a clear line of sight from strategic goals to strategic
performance.
Key Content
By linking clearly defined department objectives and performance to the company’s strategic business goals, a balanced
scorecard for HR can serve as a way of focusing human resource staff on activities that will support the company’s goals.
An HR balanced scorecard also demonstrates HR’s strategic value by defining and measuring HR’s contribution in
concrete, clearly understood terms.
For example, consider an HR function that has analyzed the organization’s strategy and has identified the following ways
in which it can contribute, based on the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard:
Financial: Develop alternative staffing strategies to provide more flexibility to meet shifts in production demands.
Customers (other functions and employees): Provide easier access to HR services, including consultation with
functional leaders.
Internal business processes: Apply technology to increase efficiency and capture data.
Learning and growth: Make sure that future leaders will be available across functions, throughout the organization.
These goals lead to actions or programs. For example, the focus on leader development leads HR management to
contract with an outside consultant to assess and work with identified high-value employees. To measure the effectiveness
of this action, HR must identify the right metrics. What will indicate that the program is, in fact, resulting in a growth in
leadership capabilities? Results from simulation exercises? Retention of key employees? Fill rate of leadership positions
from internal candidates?
For an HR balanced scorecard to be truly effective, it must:

Contain accountability and measurable results.
Be valid. The measurement system must contain understandable measures, metrics, and targets that are aligned to
the objective and can be supported with solid data.
Contain only those measures that are most important to the objective and the organization’s strategic plan; that is,
the measures must result in actionable items.
Focus on results. Simply measuring turnover or time to fill is ineffective if no action is taken as a result. More
meaningful measures that are aligned clearly with the organization’s strategic plan include productivity and retention.
Be carefully planned and executed.
HR Metrics
HR metrics focus on traditional measures of efficiency and effectiveness (e.g., budget performance, hiring ratios and
costs) and strategic HR activities (e.g., metrics indicating increased employee engagement, such as reduced absenteeism
or discipline issues, or reduced risk, such as accident rates and compliance audit results).
Exhibit 5 lists common HR metrics.
Exhibit 5: Sample HR Metrics
Metric Description Possible Use
Absence rate Ratio of lost days to number To reflect benefits of a change

of employees in workplace conditions
Accruals Comparison of budget to To monitor expense accruals
actual assignee costs and make sure that assignment
budget and financial goals are
met
Applicant yield Percentage of applicants To demonstrate effectiveness
ratio who proceed to the next of recruiting methods
step of the selection process
Cost per hire Total costs of hiring divided To demonstrate increased
by number hired efficiencies in recruitment and
hiring process
Human capital Ratio of employment-related To demonstrate value of HR

return on expenses to revenue minus programs
investment nonemployment expenses
Human capital Revenue minus Used comparatively to indicate
value added nonemployment expenses increase in employee
divided by number of full- productivity as the result of HR
time employees activities
Key talent Percentage of key talent To demonstrate effectiveness

retention retained of employee development and
reward strategies
Promotion Percentage of internal To demonstrate effectiveness
pattern promotions of development programs and
strong culture
Success ratio Proportion of selected To indicate effectiveness of
applicants who are later recruiting, selection, and
judged to be successful on orientation methods
the job
Training return Economic benefit of To demonstrate value of
on investment enhanced performance strategic choice to invest in
minus costs of developing, training
producing, and delivering
training
Transfer Number or percentage of To track internal competency
employees moving across development and global talent
divisions to new jobs management
Turnover costs Costs associated with When turnover rate is

separation, vacancy, combined with costs of
replacement, and training turnover, to demonstrate
Turnover rate Proportion of exiting economic benefits of a change
employees to all employees in pay or benefits
Vacancy costs Costs of substitute labor To support decision to
(temporary workers, outsource function or area and
contractors, outsourcing decrease internal head count
partners) minus wages and
benefits not paid because
vacant
Each organization must choose the metrics that are meaningful for their activities and strategic focus. Note that formulas
for the same metric can vary; it is important to use a consistent formula throughout your organization and when
benchmarking.
HR Audits
In an HR audit , an organization’s HR policies, practices, procedures, and strategies undergo a systematic and
comprehensive evaluation to establish whether specific HR practices are adequate to achieve the function’s goals. For
example, policies must be aligned with current organizational goals. Audit results help to identify gaps, which can then be
prioritized for corrective action.
Decisions about what to audit can result from a variety of internal and external factors. Poor KPI results may require closer
analysis of processes to identify possible causes. Changes in organizational strategy may require realignment of HR
policies and practices. New laws and technology can change the way work is done and introduce vulnerabilities that must
be managed. The audit targets are prioritized depending on the constraints of time, available resources, and/or budget.
Keeping a log of issues that have arisen may help identify areas of weakness that can be examined and addressed during
the audit process.
Types of HR Audits
There are different types of HR audits, and each is designed to examine different types of HR goals—for example, to use
resources efficiently or to maintain compliance with local laws and regulations. Exhibit 6 lists the more common types.
Exhibit 6: Types of HR Audits
Audit Type Description
Compliance Focuses on how well the organization is complying with

current employment laws and regulations
Best practices Helps the organization maintain or improve a competitive
advantage by comparing its practices to those of employers
identified as having exceptional HR practices
Strategic Focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of systems and

processes to determine whether they align with the HR
departmental and/or the organizational strategic plan
Function-specific Focuses on a specific area in the HR function (e.g., payroll,

performance management, records retention, etc.)
Source: “Conducting Human Resource Audits,” SHRM
The Audit Process

The actual process of conducting an audit typically follows these steps:
Determine the scope and type of audit. Will the audit examine all or only specified policies and processes?
Develop the audit questionnaire. This tool helps ensure that all necessary data is collected in a consistent manner.
Collect the data. The process should be designed for efficiency. It should be thorough but should aim at creating
minimal disruption.
Benchmark the findings. The findings are compared with agreed benchmarks, which may be policy or legal
requirements or best practices.
Provide feedback about results. It is an ethical obligation to describe audit findings to management. Areas of poor
performance are prioritized in terms of their strategic or risk impact.
Develop action plans. The audit generally includes recommendations for addressing the issues identified.
Ownership is assigned for the plans, and a time frame for action is set. The actions taken are reviewed. If the plans
have not been fulfilled, management may be involved.
Foster a climate of continuous improvement. Audits are a key part of a quality improvement process—a cyclical
process of planning, acting, and checking.
Exhibit 7 summarizes the audit process steps.
Exhibit 7: The HR Audit Process
Audit Step Description
Determine the scope Identification of exactly what areas should be targeted

and type of audit. for review (e.g., comprehensive review of all practice
areas or a limited review of the adequacy of a specific
process or policy)
Develop the audit Development of a comprehensive document that elicits

questionnaire. information during the inquiry (e.g., a list of specific
questions)
Collect the data. Use of the audit questionnaire as a “road map” to collect
information
Benchmark the Comparison of the audit findings with HR benchmarks

findings. (e.g., results for other similarly sized employers,
national standards, or internal organizational data)
Provide feedback about Review of data and presentation of summarized findings

the results. and recommendations (e.g., a written report and
discussions) for the organization’s HR professionals and
senior management team
Prioritization of recommendations based on the risk
level (e.g., high, medium, and low)
Development of a time line for required action(s)
Develop action plans. Development of action plans for implementing the
changes suggested by the audit, with the findings
separated by order of importance: high, medium, and
low
Foster a climate of Constant observation and continuous improvement of
continuous the organization’s policies, procedures, and practices
improvement. (e.g., continuous monitoring of HR systems to ensure
that they are up-to-date and have follow-up
mechanisms)
Source: “Conducting Human Resource Audits,” SHRM

Functional Area #7: Organizational Effectiveness
and Development
Organizational Effectiveness and Development concerns the overall structure and functionality of the
organization and involves measurement of long- and short-term effectiveness and growth of people and
processes and implementation of necessary organizational change initiatives.
Ensures that key documents and systems (e.g., job postings and descriptions, performance management systems)
accurately reflect workforce activities.
Supports change initiatives to increase the effectiveness of HR systems and processes.
Identifies areas in the organization’s structures, processes, and procedures that need change.
Provides recommendations for eliminating barriers to organizational effectiveness and development.
Collects and analyzes data on the value of HR initiatives to the organization.

Aligns HR’s strategy and activities with the organization’s mission, vision, values, and strategy.
Regularly monitors results against performance standards and goals in support of the organization’s strategy.
Establishes measurable goals and objectives to create a culture of accountability.
Consults on, plans, and designs organizational structures that align with the effective delivery of activities in support
of the organization’s strategy.
Assesses organizational needs to identify critical competencies for operational effectiveness.
Designs and oversees change initiatives to increase the effectiveness of HR systems and processes.
Ensures that HR initiatives demonstrate measurable value to the organization.
Key Concepts:
Application of behavioral assessments (e.g., personality assessments).
Intergroup dynamics (e.g., intergroup conflict).
Intragroup dynamics (e.g., group formation, identity, cohesion, structure, influence on behavior).
Organizational design structures and approaches (e.g., customer, functional, geographic, matrix, program).
Organizational performance theories, structures, and approaches.

Organizational Effectiveness and Development
In its role as a consultant to the organization, HR may be called upon to act in the capacity of an “organizational”
physician, requested by organizational leaders to examine the health of the organization, assess its ability to function at a
level needed to attain strategic goals, and recommend and possibly implement improvements to the organization’s
“effectiveness.”
Organizational effectiveness and development (OED) can be seen as a process or tool to fulfill this role—to identify and
remove internal obstacles to the organization’s strategic goals and continuous improvement. The skill of asking questions
is critical in OED, and the questions should start with “Where do we want to go?” and “What is keeping us from getting
there?” This is the effectiveness part of OED. The development part comes with the next question: “How must we change
to get onto the right path toward our goals?”
OED identifies and addresses organizational performance issues through planned interventions that engage stakeholders
in information gathering and solution design and implementation. Interventions may focus on organizational or team
performance issues. Organizational interventions may result in changes in structure, culture, competencies, technology, or
processes. Team interventions focus on developing more unified and focused teams and helping dysfunctional teams
move past conflict and toward accomplishment.
Organizational Development

Collects and analyzes data on the value of HR initiatives to the organization.
Regularly monitors results against performance standards and goals in support of the organization’s strategy.
Assesses organizational needs to identify critical competencies for operational effectiveness.
Designs and oversees change initiatives to increase the effectiveness of HR systems and processes.
Ensures that HR initiatives demonstrate measurable value to the organization.

Organizational Development
Organizational effectiveness and development (OED) focuses on the structure and functionality of the organization to
increase the long- and short-term effectiveness of people and processes. The term organizational development (OD)
refers to an organizational management discipline used to maintain and grow organizational effectiveness and efficiency
through planned interventions.
An outpatient physical therapy company was having difficulty meeting its monthly objectives. Overall employee morale
was also low. Perhaps it was a cause of the problem, or it might have been a result of the organizational performance. The
team lead of patient services was assigned to investigate the issue.
He collected and analyzed data regarding knowledge and experience at each of the company’s 15 clinics, focusing on the
clinics’ team leads. The analysis identified significant variations in competency among the 15 clinics, primarily within the
administrative and clerical function.
To address the issue, the HR professional developed a transfer-of-learning program in which offices would “share”
employees between clinics. The employees assigned temporarily to higher-performing clinics were able to obtain valuable
information to bring back to their own offices.
He discovered that his own competency in Communication was required to promote, facilitate, and foster the openness
and trust essential to the sharing of knowledge. He was able to listen, establish relationships, and model good
communication skills that the staff could use to learn about and trust each other.
Organizational Theories
If organizational development is comparable to conducting a medical examination, organizational theories help to explain
how the organization functions, including its parts and how they interact.
A number of organizational models have been developed, such as the McKinsey 7-S Framework or the Burke-Litwin
Performance and Change Model. The terms may be different, but what these models propose is very similar. In order for
an organization to implement its strategy successfully, it must align its various components. For example, its structure
must suit the strategy. If it does not, the structure—or the strategy—must be changed.
Exhibit 8 illustrates this general concept.
Exhibit 8:
Organizational
Model
The major organizational elements that must be aligned with strategy include:
Structure—the way the organization separates and connects its pieces.
Systems—the policies that guide behavior and work, the processes that define how tasks will be performed, and the
technology or tools used to support that work.
Culture—the set of beliefs, attitudes, values, and behaviors shared by members of the organization and passed on
to new members.
Values—principles that the organization and its leaders have explicitly selected as a guide for decisions and actions.
Leadership—the model of behavior that leaders set for the rest of the organization.
The way these elements are implemented and aligned can affect:
The motivation employees apply to their work.
Employees’ engagement or identification with their work and the organization’s goals.
Performance levels and results—i.e., the effectiveness and efficiency in reaching goals—for the entire organization,
for its structural pieces (e.g., divisions, functions, teams), and for individual employees.
Governance—the organization’s ethical and legal compliance and its approach to managing risk.
HR professionals will apply their Consultation competency to understand their organization according to this model and
then to evaluate its ability to meet the strategic goals the organization has set. HR will deliver a diagnosis or assessment
and then a course of treatment or interventions that will be taken to correct performance obstacles.
OED Interventions
An OED intervention can be seen as stepping in to interrupt the status quo or the current state in order to examine a
situation more closely and make changes that could improve outcomes. Interventions are often described as “structured
activities,” in the sense that an intervention may involve multiple actions that are each focused on the same objective,
organizational performance improvement.
An intervention includes both the tools used to examine the issue and the change or solution that will be implemented. For
example, HR may be asked by management to find out why it takes so long to implement strategic initiatives. In the
course of the intervention, HR may conduct multiple interviews and focus groups and determine that problems primarily
occur in departments that have recently undergone a change in leadership. After more interviews and reviews of
personnel files, HR determines that the issue is caused by a weak succession planning system that does not adequately
prepare for transitions in leadership. A program to improve succession planning is developed and launched. HR meets
with all departments to explain the new process and calm employee fears. A year later, HR reviews data on recent
initiatives, focusing on their start-up times and delays that might have been caused by leadership problems.
Since organizations are systems, solutions must address root causes and contributing factors for dysfunctions and, for
strategic changes, overall goals and key performance indicators. Changes proposed in one area must be analyzed for
possible effects on other parts of the organization. The complete answer may be an OED strategy composed of multiple
interventions, aimed perhaps at different audiences or scheduled for different stages in an extended period of change.
HR professionals may be involved in OED interventions directly as internal consultants to the organization, or they may
participate indirectly with third-party consultants, contributing their knowledge of the organization, its people, and its
processes and their expertise in managing workforce capabilities and productivity. HR managers may apply OED
principles to increasing the effectiveness of the HR function.
Key Content
The OED strategy should include the correct number and type of interventions, aimed at the correct audiences and
sequenced and scheduled for maximum effectiveness. For example, improving a dysfunctional team’s performance may
require first a workshop to reach consensus on shared vision, roles and responsibilities, and ground rules. This may be
followed by individual coaching with the team’s leader and team workshops on conflict resolution. Those interventions may
be followed by redesign of processes such as communication.
Proactive Interventions
Proactive OED interventions identify and correct potential problems before they begin affecting performance. They may
also prepare the organization to take advantage of anticipated opportunities. For example, OED can help organizations
that must compete in a rapidly changing marketplace to develop:
Communication networks that allow critical information to be exchanged quickly, free of hierarchical structures that
slow communication.
Iterative work processes (developing a product through increasingly functional versions) that control the costs of
mistakes while allowing continuous learning and improvement.
Structures that allow employees to make decisions quickly and independently.
Intrinsically motivated employees who feel they can try new ideas without being punished for worthy failures.
Remedial Interventions
Remedial interventions make changes that bring an organization back on course toward its strategic goals. For example,
during economic downturns, organizations can adopt a “do more with less” operating style that reaps some short-term
benefits due to cost savings. However, these short-term benefits might inflict long-term problems on the organizations’
overall capabilities, organizational structure, business processes, and levels of workforce engagement, such as:
Diminished capacity, capability, and agility. The organization no longer has the quality or quantity of human
resources to remain competitive.
Misaligned organizational structure. Employees may be forced to perform duties for which they are not equipped.
Managers may be neglecting strategic work to accomplish immediate tactical tasks.
Broken work processes. Processes are not redesigned to the conditions. Rather, they work around current
limitations and grow less efficient and effective.
Declining workforce engagement. Feeling stressed and underpaid for their increased workloads, employee
productivity may decline. If the economy has improved, valued employees may leave.
Assessing OED Interventions

To demonstrate the value of an intervention, HR professionals must measure and report to their internal clients the effects
of the intervention.
The most important measure of success is the degree to which the intervention has improved the organization’s ability to
attain its strategic goals. HR and the client should identify reasonable change or improvement goals when planning the
intervention.
Whether the strategic goal is increasing output, engagement, or market responsiveness, organizational performance
metrics focus on an organization’s:
Efficiency in using resources to create value. A common metric here is the ratio of revenue or income to cost of
sales and goods. It could also be measured by the number of hours or the number of full-time employees it takes to
produce a good or service. A not-for-profit organization may consider the number of clients it serves.
Effectiveness in achieving its strategic goals. This may include a much broader range of metrics that evaluate,
for example, the organization’s ability to:
Attain its targets (e.g., increased market share, lower rate of homelessness).
Develop key competencies (e.g., innovation, customer focus, quality).
Create the internal environment leaders envision (e.g., collaborative work, distributed decision making, diverse
teams, ethical decision making).
The client’s perception of the experience is also an important part of the assessment. Clients may be surveyed or
interviewed after the intervention about whether their expectations were fulfilled. Were objectives achieved? Did HR
communicate the process well during the planning phase and then throughout the process? Did HR involve and listen to
stakeholders (e.g., employees)?
Finally, HR should assess its own effectiveness and efficiency in conducting the intervention. Did HR achieve its own
quality goals throughout the intervention? Did members of the team execute their roles properly? Were commitments to
the client met in terms of project deliverables (e.g., written reports) and promised delivery dates?
Characteristics of Effective OED Interventions

Effective OED interventions share the following characteristics:
They are strategically aligned and have top management support.
They are evidence-based and avoid assumptions and generalizations.
They aim for sustainable results and continuous improvement. Solutions focus on systemic changes rather than
patches.
They use the shared language and tools of organizational development so that everyone involved in the intervention
understands the goals and processes.
They are collaborative, inviting input and feedback from all those affected.
They are flexible and dynamic; solutions are revised based on results and feedback.
Some characteristics of effective organizational effectiveness and development interventions are described in Exhibit 9.
Exhibit 9: Characteristics of Effective OED Interventions
Characteristics Importance
Strategically aligned Helps ensure that plans reinforce, complement, and build on each
other and support overall organizational goals and strategies
Collaborative Facilitates discovery of causes and development of solutions with
critical input from those most closely involved (managers,
supervisors, and employees) in intervention area
Supported by top Helps reduce resistance to eventual change
management
Producing sustainable Changes that can continue to deliver long-term results, perhaps
results because of management preparation or group involvement and
acceptance of new processes and success criteria
Supporting continuous Aims at strengthening the organization in an ongoing manner by

improvement identifying weaknesses and opportunities and engaging employees in
performance improvement (Continuous improvement is a basic tenet
of the quality management programs to which many organizations
today have committed.)
Using common tools Allows for easy comparisons and collation of data
Using common language Avoids confusion and misunderstanding
Explicit assumptions Allow the validity of underlying assumptions to be challenged
Fact-based Clarifies the difference between what is known and what is supposed
Oriented toward systems Uses systems theory and IPO model to analyze problems (These
and processes topics are discussed in the HR Strategic Planning Functional Area in
the People module.)
Flexibility Recognizes and accepts that assumptions are likely to change
Multiple perspectives Provides access to diverse perspectives
Why OED Interventions Fail

It is important to remember all the dangers that can surround an intervention as it is planned, implemented, and sustained.
Some interventions fail because they never get started. Those involved may be afraid of the effect of change on the
organization and may hold back. They collect data, they analyze it, they discuss possible actions, but in the end they fail to
act. This is often called “analysis paralysis,” but the analysis is not the problem. The real issue is a reluctance to take
reasonable risks.
Other interventions fail because their objectives are too grand or the number of changes necessary is too great. The
hurdles may be limited resources or an organization that is not skilled at change. The requirements for the objectives to be
met may not have been thoroughly defined, and therefore the organization is not prepared or equipped to implement the
changes. The impact of external forces may be underestimated. The gaps between the current and envisioned
organizational cultures may be too great to overcome in the amount of time allocated. Small steps may be required rather
than great leaps.
And sometimes interventions fail because the planners focus on their solution and not on the people who will make the
solution work. Interventions involve change, and implementing change involves the entire organization. Some of the
specific communication pitfalls and possible remedies for them are the following:
Leadership does not get involved. Sometimes decisions about major organizational changes are made at the top
management level and then news is allowed to trickle down to employees. As a result, why and how the organization
is changing may be unclear. Leaders and HR professionals should roll out a clear, universal, consistent message to
everyone in the organization at the same time, even across multiple sites and locations.
The wrong messengers are used. Studies have found that employees tend to trust information from managers.
Understanding the organization’s culture will indicate who is the best messenger for change—the manager, the
senior executive team, or HR. Middle and front-line leaders are the primary communicators to employees;
communication from them should be frequent and consistent. Everyone affected by the change needs to know what
it entails, why and how it is happening, and what’s in it for them. Don’t impose change; engage employees in a
conversation about it. Ask them what they think and how they are feeling. They will talk if you listen.
Communication is too sudden. Leaders and managers need to prepare employees for change, allow time for the
message to sink in, and give them an opportunity to provide feedback before a change is initiated.
Communication is too late. If anxieties are not managed in a timely manner, it will take longer for changes to be
accepted, and, during this period, productivity and employee engagement will suffer. To avoid this problem, HR
should be involved in change planning early to help motivate employees to participate. While the solution is being
developed, HR needs to develop a plan for communicating the program to the organization—both the content of the
message and the way in which it will be communicated. Change-related information should be communicated to
employees via multiple forms (e.g., e-mails, meetings, training sessions, internal social media, press releases).
Communication is not aligned with organizational realities. Messages should be honest and include the reasons
behind the change and the projected outcomes.
Communication is too narrow. If the communication focuses too much on detail and technicalities and does not
link change to the organization’s goals, it will not resonate with employees.
Improving Organizational Performance

Ensures that key documents and systems (e.g., job postings and descriptions, performance management systems)
accurately reflect workforce activities.
Establishes measurable goals and objectives to create a culture of accountability.
Consults on, plans, and designs organizational structures that align with the effective delivery of activities in support
of the organization’s strategy.

Organizational design structures and approaches (e.g., customer, functional, geographic, matrix, program).
Improving Organizational Performance
Improving organizational performance often involves aligning structure, roles and responsibilities, process, and culture
with new strategic goals.
An organization is pursuing a growth strategy through merger and acquisition (M&A). HR has been actively involved in
performing due diligence for a proposed M&A target. Senior management is very committed to acquiring the operation
because it would advance their planned vertical strategy.
The chief human resources officer (CHRO) is reviewing data gathered by an HR task force. This analysis is supported by
a variety of Behavioral Competencies. Much of the data is financial, assessing the financial implications of the target’s
workforce demographics and existing contracts. Business Acumen and Critical Evaluation help there. Global and Cultural
Effectiveness helps the CHRO note some characteristics of the target company’s culture that might cause problems. A few
lines in a report suggest that the CHRO’s organization differs in its approach to employee relations from the organization
targeted for acquisition. The CHRO’s organization has implemented many processes designed to promote individual
initiative and innovation. The target organization, however, is very hierarchical. This is reflected in the many layers of
approvals that must be obtained to make decisions, the intricate dispute resolution path, and the formal communication
channels its employees must follow. The differences suggest entirely different employee relations strategies, probably
different cultures, and possibly different employee skill sets, which could have strategic implications.
Using the Consultation competency, the CHRO presents HR’s complete findings to senior management, emphasizing the
cultural and strategic challenges that this merger poses.
Organizational Interventions
Organizational interventions look at how the structure of the organization is helping or hindering the organization’s
strategic progress. Organizational structure refers to the way in which work groups are related.
Organizational interventions are required when an organization:

Is failing to meet its strategic objectives because its structure is inefficient and/or ineffective. The organization’s
structure no longer meets its needs. A common example of this situation is the progression of an organization
through its early stages of growth. The organization’s design must be aligned with its new realities.
Has changed its competitive strategies and needs to develop new skills and traits—for example, skills needed to
respond to market changes quickly. The organizational design must be focused in a new direction.
Redesigning the Organization

Organizational design refers to elements that support an organization’s functioning. These elements include structure but
other factors as well, including:
The organization’s mission and vision and the strategies it is pursuing to achieve its goals.
The way decisions are made.
The way information is communicated.
The processes used to perform work and the degree to which those processes connect parts of the organization’s
structure and the way in which those linkages are managed.
The systems used to align the organization’s needs with the resources required to fill those needs. This, of course,
includes human resources and all the systems HR uses to fulfill its responsibilities, from recruitment through talent
management and exit. It can also include physical and financial assets (e.g., equipment, facilities, budgets) and
organizational knowledge and expertise.
All of these elements create the integrated system that is the organization. Any OED solution must acknowledge the
integrated nature of the organization’s design.
HR’s Role in Organizational Design

HR’s roles and responsibilities in organizational design should include:
Providing leaders with a structural diagnosis by identifying the root causes of organizational performance issues.
Helping leaders evaluate a range of clear design options.
Ensuring that leaders align organizational design decisions with short- and long-term strategic goals by identifying
critical activities, strengths, and weaknesses.
Helping leaders understand their roles and responsibilities that ensure that the structure is properly implemented.
Continually monitoring the structure for alignment with the organization’s business strategy and highlighting
challenges as needed.
Planning for internal or external resources to deliver appropriate short- or long-term development interventions and
activities and ensuring that those resources have the appropriate subject matter expertise and credibility to be
effective or have the appropriate background, relationship-building skills, and cultural familiarity to quickly build
credibility.
Structural Characteristics in Organizational Design

Organizational structures share certain characteristics that must be aligned with the organization’s strategic goals,
competitive environment, and culture.
Work Specialization
Work specialization refers to the degree to which tasks are performed as separate jobs. While work specialization is seen
as increasing efficiency and quality, it can also result in boredom and lack of quality. And in complex and technology-driven
enterprises, specialization can also hamper collaboration and innovation.
Decision-Making Authority
This principle describes how decisions are made within the organization. Authority relates to the scope of responsibilities
that define the area in which a manager or supervisor is empowered to make decisions. The organization determines
which decisions can be made at each level of the organization and within each function in order to ensure that the best
decisions are made in the most timely manner. In a global organization, decisions may be made at headquarters
(centralized) or delegated to other parts of the organization (decentralized).
Layers of Hierarchy
The hierarchical layers of an organization range from the chief executive officer to the employee in a function. The trend in
organizational structure has been to reduce the number of layers and waste within organizations. The result is flatter and,
leaders hope, more efficient organizations with fewer staff support positions. The ratio of direct to indirect employees
(people doing the work as opposed to people supporting those doing the work) is a key metric of organizational efficiency.
Global organizations often value nimbleness or agility since their interconnectedness and global exposure may call for
rapid organizational response.
There are two important concepts when determining the layers of hierarchy: chain of command and span of control.
Span of control refers to the number of individuals who report to a supervisor. Executives, managers, supervisors, and
subordinates are hierarchically connected through the chain of command. Organizations in which many subordinates
report to a few supervisors are referred to as “flat.” There are many factors that drive an organization toward a wider span
of control, including the desire for subordinates to communicate directly with their ultimate supervisor and decision maker.
However, spans of control that are too large can slow an organization, making it difficult for supervisors to make decisions
quickly. Many decisions must flow to the top, and the decision queue can become crowded. Flat organizations can be
nimbler. When decisions are made, they can be communicated and implemented quickly.
Chain of command refers to the line of authority within an organization. Traditionally, a subordinate reported to only one
superior. This eliminated the confusion, loss of productivity, and stress that could result from an employee trying to follow
the directions of two separate managers. Today the chain of command is growing less distinct in many organizations. As
organizations push decision-making authority downward or become matrixed, and as ad hoc or permanent work teams
become more common, the line of authority can appear lateral or web-like.
Formalization
Formalization refers to the extent to which rules, policies, and procedures govern the behavior of employees in the
organization. The more formal the organization, the greater the written documentation, rules, and regulations. Some
organizations are more loosely structured than others. Formalization may serve an organization well when uniformity is an
imperative—for example, when there is low tolerance for variations in parts or when it is critical that, for reasons of
compliance, a process be conducted in a precise manner. It can, however, restrict employees’ abilities to respond to
unusual situations or customer needs as well as stifle creativity and innovation.
Over time, formalization becomes ingrained in an organization’s culture and can be difficult to change. This may be a
challenge when an organization merges with or acquires an entity with a dissimilar approach to formalization. Similarly,
when an organization expands into a country or region where different culturally defined tastes for formalization prevail, it
has to decide how to manage the differences to achieve global cohesion.
Mechanistic and Organic Organizations

A mechanistic organization tends to be highly specialized, hierarchical, and formal, while in an organic organization job
boundaries are less distinct and there are fewer levels of decision makers and a more flexible approach to structures and
rules.
Departmentalization and Types of Structures

Departmentalization refers to the way an organization groups its jobs and aligns effort. Four commonly seen structures
are discussed here (functional, product, geographic, and matrix), but you may encounter other, less common types of
structures in your work. New business models may require different structural approaches.
There are advantages and disadvantages to each type of organizational structure, as shown in Exhibit 10.
Exhibit 10: Advantages and Disadvantages of Organizational Structures
Type of
Advantages Disadvantages
Structure
Functional Easy to understand Weaker customer or product

Specializations develop focus
Economies of scale Potentially weak

communication among
Easier communication within
functions
functions
Weak grasp of broader
Clear career paths
organizational issues
Product Economies of scale Regional or local focus
Product team culture Weak customer focus
Product expertise
Cross-functional
communication
Geographic Proximity to customer Fewer economies of scale
Adapted to local practices Potential issues with
Quicker response time consistency across regions
(e.g., practices, values,
Cross-functional
strategic focus)
communication
Matrix Combination of cross- Complex reporting structures

disciplinary capabilities and Potential for conflicts between
perspectives functions and projects over
Availability of best global resources
talent Potential cultural conflicts on
Flexibility and agility teams
Functional Structure
In a functional structure , departments are defined by the services they contribute to the organization’s overall mission,
such as marketing and sales, operations, and HR. Traditionally, this has been the most common organizational structure.
A related method is departmentalization by process. If the organization’s work is divided according to a linear process, the
organization might be divided into departments like design, supplies procurement, manufacturing, sales and marketing,
distribution, and customer service.
Exhibit 11 illustrates a functional structure. In this example, all employees—no matter what products they are working on—
report to a single location.
Exhibit 11:
Functional
Organization
Some units are considered line units while others are considered staff units. Line units are work groups that conduct the
major business of the organization, such as the production or marketing functions. Staff units assist the line units by
performing specialized services for the organization, such as accounting or HR.
Product or Customer Structure

In an organization with a product structure , functional departments are grouped under major product divisions. A
consumer electronics company, for example, may have separate divisions for home appliances, mobile devices, and
televisions. Each division will have its own marketing, sales, manufacturing, and finance functions. More employees are
required to staff this type of organization, but presumably this is offset by accumulated experience and expertise.
Exhibit 12 illustrates a product structure.
Exhibit 12:
Product
Organization
The customer structure is similar, with each division focusing on a group of customers with distinct needs. For example, a
financial service business may have commercial, residential, and institutional customer divisions.
Geographic Structure
A geographic structure is very similar to a product structure, with the exception that geographic regions or countries—
rather than products—define the organizational chart. A purely domestic organization may be structured around regions
within the country. Global organizations may be organized by, for example, continents or countries. Each region or country
has its own complete and self-sufficient set of functions. More employees are required to staff this type of organization
than in a purely functional enterprise, but value is achieved because each division can be more responsive to local
markets.
Exhibit 13 illustrates a geographic structure. The example shows the geographic structure for a multinational enterprise.
Each region or country has its own division, and decision making is decentralized. The region must be sufficiently large to
support this structure.
Exhibit 13:
Geographic
Organization
Matrix Structures
A matrix structure combines departmentalization by division or program and function to gain the benefits of both. An
organization may use a matrix structure when the vertical hierarchy begins to obstruct value activities—when silos get in
the way of collaboration. A matrix structure includes cross-functional teams who may work together to design, develop,
and market products.
Key Content
The matrix structure creates a dual rather than single chain of command. As a result, some employees report to two
managers rather than one, with neither manager assuming a superior role. The project or program manager interacts with
the employee about project work; the functional manager may be responsible for regular performance reviews and career
development. This structure requires good communication and collaboration between the managers. Without it, employees
may become overworked and stressed.
An example of a matrix structure would be an aeronautics manufacturer who maintains the usual functions but structures
work around contracts that it has received or programs dedicated to developing new models or technologies. As contracts
and programs end, employees return to their functions and wait for reassignment to new projects.
Aligning Roles and Responsibilities in New Organizational

Structures
Lack of clarity about authority and coordination of communication can cause highly integrated structures, such as matrix
structures, to fail. This is often addressed simply by better defining the roles and responsibilities of each member in the
structure.
The RACI matrix is commonly used for this purpose. A sample matrix is shown in Exhibit 14.
Exhibit 14: RACI Chart
Activity John Mary Team leaders George

Documenting Responsible Accountable Consulting Informed
changes
Key Content
RACI stands for responsible (R), accountable (A), consult (C), and inform (I). For any given activity, individuals will be
assigned a certain role.
For example, one of the activities in a software development function may be to track and record changes to software
programs. In this instance:
A responsible member will perform the activity. In our example, John is responsible for updating documentation of
every change made to the software issued by the function. For a large and/or complex activity, multiple people may
be assigned responsibility for a single activity and must coordinate performance with each other.
The accountable member is in charge of the activity and answers to management for the activity’s performance. This
individual approves and allocates resources. In our example, the accountable person would probably be the head of
the software development function, Mary. To avoid confusion, there should be only one accountable role. An
accountable member, however, may also be involved in performing the activity or providing guidance and expertise.
A consulted member provides advice or information necessary to perform the task. For example, the leaders of the
different software application teams or the coders/designers themselves may be tasked with providing this
information to John.
Members to be informed receive communication about activities but do not perform or consult. For example, George
needs to know when changes are being made because his responsibility is to contact all the users in the
organization about changes that may affect them.
A RACI chart helps an organization establish clarity around its critical activities by assigning responsibility and describing
communication needs. These charts can be a helpful exercise when an organization is restructuring or introducing new
activities or processes.
Building Organizational Performance

Interventions may require focusing on performance requirements at an organizational level: knowledge and skills,
technology, processes, and organizational culture.
Gaps in Required Knowledge and Skills

A gap analysis must be performed between the skill set needed now or in the near future and the skill set as defined in
current job descriptions. These problems may be addressed through different types of training, coaching, and mentoring.
Job descriptions must be revised to align with current needs. For example, an OED intervention may identify a strategic
need for a deeper pool of supervisory/managerial talent. High-potential employees may be identified and provided with the
knowledge and skills needed to fill this organizational need (e.g., mentored job experience; training in leadership,
relationship management, and communication skills.)
Activities designed to develop organizational talent are shown in Exhibit 15.
Exhibit 15: Talent Development Interventions
Activity Tasks
Identify the talent needs of Ensure that the current job descriptions accurately reflect the
the organization. What is work to be done to achieve organizational objectives, and
essential to meet the prepare job descriptions for any anticipated positions.
overall objectives? Clarify performance standards and assessment metrics.
Compare skill set inventories (formal and informal) of the
incumbents to the selected future competencies.
Identify any competency deficiencies.
Develop existing staff. Determine if adequate staffing exists or if recruitment efforts will
be required.
Coordinate selection processes.
Develop comprehensive workforce development initiatives that
grow internal technical/functional capabilities as well as the
management and employee behavioral practices needed to
achieve results.
Build talent pool. Establish a comprehensive performance management program
that stresses instituting stretch goals.
Communicate performance expectations.
Measure performance objectively and regularly, and provide
candid, honest feedback on a regular basis.
Develop coaching or mentoring programs and internal social
networks between experienced and more-junior employees to
promote knowledge sharing.
Identify the positions for which succession planning (a proactive
program designed to keep talent in the pipeline) makes sense.
These often include key positions, positions with direct impact on
strategic practices, and those with lengthy learning curves.
Technology Requirements
Inadequate technology can prevent employees from performing efficiently. These issues may be addressed through new
or expanded technology—for example, new digital tools that reduce errors or expanded knowledge management systems
that put information into the hands of those who need it when they need it.
Process Requirements
Over time, work processes can become detached from customer needs, changing technology, or changed work
conditions. Obstacles that cause serious delays can develop. Work can be duplicated by multiple groups. Separate groups
may work with different objectives. The resulting conflicts may not be apparent until late in the process. Processes must
be routinely audited for efficiency and the need for updating and then redesigned and tested.
Organizational Culture Requirements

As a result of organizational evolution or a change in strategic focus, the organization’s culture may no longer support the
organization’s vision of its future and its values.
An intervention aimed at cultural transformation can include the following steps:
1. Describe the current culture. This involves observing language (e.g., the expressions and metaphors commonly
used) and leadership and decision-making styles (e.g., autocratic, participative); mapping communication paths and
choices; identifying meaningful objects, stories, people, and behaviors (i.e., rituals); and gathering evidence of
values in action.
Assessment instruments, cultural audits, and focus groups can be used to describe key elements of the current
culture and identify possible areas of conflict, disconnect, or dysfunction. For example, if customer service is a focus
of the organization’s culture, evaluate how much time employees spend visiting customer sites, how much
interaction they have with customers, what customer service training they receive, and other indicators of a customer
service focus. These tangible customer service indicators can then be measured before and after the OED initiative
to provide data for the initiative’s success or failure.
2. Identify the aspirational culture. The OED team researches existing data and interviews key leaders to define the
desired cultural traits.
3. Identify gaps and conflicts. Leadership must acknowledge these discrepancies and decide that the aspirational
culture is in fact what they need and want. The OED team can help leaders understand how culture is affecting
factors such as performance, employee engagement, and employer brand.
4. Develop change initiatives. Organizational culture can be changed in various ways:

Correcting managers who do not support necessary cultural traits (such as employee involvement in decision
making) or model organizational values, and punishing or replacing those managers if necessary
Aligning reward systems with desired behaviors and values
Replacing old cultural artifacts, which may require creating new rituals and identifying new heroes
Greater emphasis on leader behavior—on communicating and modeling desired values and actions
For example, an organization that has made a public commitment to diversity may discover that its workforce is not
diverse, that its management still represents only one cultural perspective, that it is not attracting and retaining diverse
candidates. The OED strategy here will focus on various interventions:
A new recruiting process will be engineered to produce the desired diverse candidate pool.
An onboarding program will be designed to support new hires’ transition into the workforce (perhaps through peer
mentoring programs).
Education on cultural differences and stereotyping is made a requirement for advancement into supervisory
positions.
An office is established to collect, investigate, and brief management on employee complaints about discrimination.
Improving Team Performance


Application of behavioral assessments (e.g., personality assessments).
Intergroup dynamics (e.g., intergroup conflict).
Intragroup dynamics (e.g., group formation, identity, cohesion, structure, influence on behavior).
Improving Team Performance
Improving team performance often involves improving team formation and function. Interventions may help teams reach
levels of productivity more quickly or help dysfunctional teams revise roles and behaviors.
An OED director for a film and television media company is asked by the executive vice president (EVP) of television
advertising sales to “do some team building” with the disgruntled team of a senior vice president (SVP) who also happens
to bring in more revenue than the other four SVPs collectively. The EVP says he wants to “build up the morale” in the
“over-stressed department.”
After holding one-on-one interviews with all team members, it is highly evident that, as a team, they are highly functional,
and, in fact, that is what seems to hold them together. However, they each report the highly abusive, inappropriate
management style of their boss, the SVP. Some express a significant fear of retribution just for discussing their
experiences.
Team members reveal being pressured to work 12- to 14-hour days and skip family events. The SVP called one employee
at his mother’s funeral and insisted that he come back to work that afternoon. Some have experienced belittling comments
about their personal appearance made publicly, including derogatory comments against protected classes.
Calling on the Ethical Practice competency, the OED director ensures confidentiality, to the maximum extent possible, of
who said what, reassures the employees of the company’s no-retaliation policy, and notes that some of these incidents
need to be reported and that could lead to a separate investigation.
Before sharing feedback with the SVP, the OED director meets with the EVP and shares the very disconcerting, and
potentially explosive, feedback that has been gathered. The EVP’s response is, “I understand this is a problem. But let me
be perfectly clear, you will not do anything to demotivate the SVP, cause him to leave, and put that revenue stream at risk.”
You share this with the head of HR and are told to “make it work and don’t rock the boat.”
The OED director feels a personal sense of responsibility to address the serial harassment doled out by the SVP. He
knows, however, that this is more than just a sense of his personal and professional integrity. He also has a hunch that
now that this information has been shared with a member of human resources and in turn with the EVP, he has a duty to
look into this further to understand any additional legal risk to the company for not addressing this harassment.
The OED director meets with and shares the information with internal legal counsel and solicits and gains support for
building a legal and business case to take action to stop this manager’s behavior immediately. The case presents a risk of
potential legal consequences for the company, the SVP, and the EVP for knowing about these behaviors and not having
taken action to prevent them. The business case presents the impact of a mass exit by the team reporting to the SVP.
Once better aware of these risks, the EVP decides to take action.
The OED director demonstrates the ability to integrate core values, integrity, and accountability throughout all
organizational and business practices by:
Acting with personal, professional, and behavioral integrity.
Responding immediately to all reports of unethical behavior or conflicts of interest.
Empowering all employees to report unethical behavior or conflicts of interest without fear of reprisal.
Showing consistency between espoused and enacted values.
Establishing himself as a credible and trustworthy resource to whom employees may voice concerns.
Challenging other executives and senior leaders when potential conflicts of interest arise.
Withstanding politically motivated pressure when developing strategy.
Setting the standard as a role model of ethical behavior by consistently conforming to the highest ethical standards
and practices.
Balancing organizational success and employee advocacy when creating strategy.
Team or Unit Interventions
OED interventions aimed at teams or units are often triggered by reports of poor performance. The causes may include
high levels of unresolved conflict within the team, poor leadership, and poor communication. These issues interfere with
the formation of effective teams.
Team interventions focus on processes and interactions within and between teams.
Common targets for team interventions include:

New groups that must develop a team identity.
Dysfunctional groups that must identify and resolve conflicts that are hurting productivity.
Existing groups that must redefine processes and relationships to be more productive or to align with the needs of a
new strategic direction.
Virtual teams that must learn to trust each other and communicate and collaborate over distances and sometimes
across different languages and cultures.
For example, a cross-functional team may be working on a particularly important project and experiencing high levels of
conflict that are damaging productivity and alarming senior management. OED interventions here might focus on
supporting the stages of team formation and coaching the team leader on conflict resolution skills and improving group
dynamics.
Team Formation Process

A certain amount of conflict and dysfunction is inevitable as teams form. Bruce Tuckman defined four stages of group or
team development (see Exhibit 16):
Forming. Individuals come together around common activity and shared goals. Members are polite, but there is little
sense of trust, shared experience, or common values.
Storming. Individuals move past politeness, and there may be higher levels of discord as perspectives, styles, and
agendas clash. This may be painful, but valuable communication is occurring.
Norming. Over time, effective groups build trust and establish relationships. They create rules that guide behavior.
They begin to establish a group identity and to identify “outsiders.” This can sometimes take a negative form.
“Groupthink” can impel members to adopt the same positions and reject outside views; this can dampen innovation
and creative problem solving.
Performing. The group becomes fully productive, collaborative, and mutually supportive.
Exhibit 16:
Tuckman’s
Ladder of
Team
Development
The group leader plays an important role in facilitating this evolution. During the early stages, the group leader can provide
opportunities for communication and relationship building and can enforce ground rules that prevent permanent animosity
between some group members.
Since the group can be affected by changes of any sort—for example, by the addition or loss of group members, by
changes in work processes or environment—the leader plays an important role in helping the group move as quickly as
possible through the common reactions to change and become fully productive again.
Group Dynamics
In 1948 Kenneth Benne and Paul Sheats proposed that there are three basic types of roles individuals play within groups:
Task roles help get the work done. Those performing this role propose solutions or collaborate in group problem
solving. They share task information and perform their assigned tasks.
Social roles help maintain relationships and positive group function. This role recognizes the importance of social
and interpersonal ties within a group. Group members playing a social role promote harmony, conflict resolution, and
involvement of all group members.
Dysfunctional roles weaken the group and reduce its productivity. In a dysfunctional role, a group member may
attack others, dominate discussions, resist others’ ideas, or damage group focus and energy through negativity.
Key Content
Benne and Sheats found that an individual’s role in a group can change under different circumstances. For example, a
group leader who is very task-focused at first may gradually become more focused on social roles as the group agrees on a
direction and individual responsibilities.
Managing group dynamics requires:

Recognizing the need for both task and social roles.
Quickly identifying and correcting dysfunctional roles, perhaps through behavioral assessments, offline discussions,
and/or coaching.
Understanding the usefulness of certain roles at certain points in the group process and making sure that these roles
are present when needed and managed when they obstruct progress. For example, team members adept at
improving social connections contribute greatly at the beginning of the project, but when the group is focused on
work, they may find a social focus distracting.
Team Building
Team building involves a series of activities designed to help team members examine how they function now and how they
could function better. This includes both the nature of their work (what they do or create together) and how they coordinate
and collaborate on their efforts (how they work together). Emphasis is on early identification and solution of problems that
stand in the way of group effectiveness. The purpose of a team-building intervention is to facilitate the alignment of the
management team with the team’s mission and goals and to develop effective team dynamics for working together to
accomplish these goals.
Team-building activities may focus on:
Goals and priorities. The OED team may facilitate team meetings in which mission, vision, values, and norms are
developed. Meetings could also focus on understanding the team’s stakeholders better and developing better
processes for engaging stakeholders.
Role and responsibility of each team member. In new, merged, or existing teams, unclear roles can create conflict
and loss of productivity. The OED team can facilitate role and responsibility negotiation and definition. This activity
could use the roles and responsibilities matrix discussed earlier in this section.
Processes for team activities, such as assigning tasks, monitoring progress, and evaluating results; for
communicating and coordinating efforts; and for making decisions. The OED team can help diagram processes in
terms of inputs, requirements, and outputs. These diagrams can be used to sequence activities more efficiently,
identify potential obstacles and solutions, define communication requirements and channels, identify organizational
systems that can support the team, and make sure all team members have what they need to perform their assigned
tasks.
Interpersonal relationships within the team, such as building trust, communicating more effectively, resolving
conflict, negotiating, and cultural awareness. The OED team can advise team leaders on changes that can build trust
(e.g., non-work team events that allow team members to learn about each other as human beings), facilitate
workshops in which team members confront their disagreements, and guide them safely to effective solutions. The
OED team may also deliver developmental activities on these essential skills.
Functional Area #8: Workforce Management
Workforce Management refers to HR practices and initiatives that allow the organization to meet its talent
needs (e.g., workforce planning, succession planning) and to close critical competency gaps.
Identifies gaps in workforce competencies and misalignment of staffing levels.
Implements approaches (e.g., buy or build) to ensure that appropriate workforce staffing levels and competencies
exist to meet the organization’s goals and objectives.
Plans short-term strategies to develop workforce competencies that support the organization’s goals and objectives.
Administers and supports approaches (e.g., succession plans, high-potential development programs) to ensure that
the organization’s leadership needs are met.
Supports strategies for restructuring the organization’s workforce (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, downsizing).

Evaluates how the organization’s strategy and goals align with future and current staffing levels and workforce
competencies.
Develops strategies to maintain a robust workforce that has the talent to carry out the organization’s current and
future strategy and goals.
Coordinates with business leaders to create strategies (e.g., succession planning, leadership development, training)
that address the organization’s leadership needs.
Develops strategies for restructuring the organization’s workforce (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, downsizing).
Key Concepts:
Analysis of labor supply and demand.
Approaches to restructuring (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, downsizing).
Best practices and techniques for knowledge management, retention, and transfer.
Leadership development and planning (e.g., high-potential development programs).
Succession planning programs and techniques.
Techniques for organizational need-gap analysis (e.g., examination of HR records, interviews, focus groups).
Workforce planning approaches, techniques, and analyses (e.g., attrition, gap and solution, implementation and
evaluation, reduction in force, supply and demand, workforce profile).
Workforce Management
Workforce management encompasses all the activities needed to ensure that workforce size and competencies meet the
organization’s strategic needs. HR plays a vital role in these activities, ensuring that the right numbers of the right people
are in the right jobs with the right skills at the right time. In this sense, workforce management is, in its essence, a form of
risk management. HR manages human resources to maximize the organization’s opportunities for success.
The workforce management process begins with the workforce management plan, which assesses workforce needs
against future demands. It also includes long-term strategies to sustain workforce strength (e.g., talent management,
succession planning, and knowledge management) and short-term strategies to address identified gaps (e.g., temporary
and contingency workers, outsourcing, and workforce resizing).
Workforce Planning

Identifies gaps in workforce competencies and misalignment of staffing levels.
Evaluates how the organization’s strategy and goals align with future and current staffing levels and workforce
competencies.

Analysis of labor supply and demand.
Techniques for organizational need-gap analysis (e.g., examination of HR records, interviews, focus groups).
Workforce Planning
From the inception of the HR discipline, one of HR’s key roles has been staffing the organization: identifying organizational
human capital needs and then providing an adequate supply of qualified individuals for jobs. Through staffing, the
organization’s current and future needs for knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics—its required
competencies—must be met.
In workforce management, HR professionals can call on their Business Acumen to anticipate organizational actions and
prepare an action plan. In the following case, an HR practitioner demonstrates understanding of the organization’s
business environment and the workforce’s current state and will be ready with a recommendation when the opportunity
materializes.
An HR practitioner for a steel fabrication plant learns that there is a possibility to introduce a new product. Understanding
that the current staff is working at capacity on the existing products, the HR practitioner takes a look at the experience and
training of the existing team members and their potential to learn and lead new product activities. The HR practitioner then
identifies a local temporary staffing organization that can provide quality temporary employees to either back-fill the
current work or work on the new project.
The HR practitioner also identifies the costs for the human resources needed and for any training and development
activities that would be required to support the new product. Applying the Consultation competency, she approaches the
plant manager with a plan that will support his expansion strategy and provides the financial and other pertinent data he
needs to include in his business plan.
Workforce Planning Process
Workforce planning is the first step in the workforce management process. It involves all the activities needed to ensure
that workforce size and competencies meet current and future organizational and individual needs. Workforce planning
strategically aligns an organization’s human capital with its business direction. This requires that the HR professional look
at where the organization is now as well as where it wants to be in the future. During workforce planning, the current state
of the workforce is defined, gaps in size and competency are identified, and steps required to prepare for future needs are
developed.
Key Content
An organization’s strategic plans should generate a list of the workforce capabilities needed to execute business strategy as
well as a monetary value for each capability based on how critical it is to generating new revenues or reducing costs. Then,
as with a well-managed supply chain, employers should compare the competencies they need with the “inventory”
(workforce) they actually have. The gap between the ideal and the real can keep learning needs (and budgets) in line
because it will sustain a focus on what people really need in order to be competent and to execute strategy.
A workforce analysis gathers data about the current workforce and forecasts future workforce needs. This information is
analyzed to provide the data to support the organization’s staffing strategy. Forecasting involves projecting future
conditions based on information about the past and the present. It is used to estimate future workforce supply and
demand. Forecasts are subject to error, as the conditions on which they are based may change. But with careful planning,
HR professionals can generally forecast with enough accuracy to help sustain organizational objectives and strategies.
Sound forecasting requires environmental scanning—for example, the age of the current workforce or the availability of
certain skills in the market.
A workforce analysis typically includes four areas: supply analysis, demand analysis, gap analysis, and solution analysis.
Exhibit 17 illustrates the workforce analysis process and the key questions addressed at each stage.
Exhibit
17:
Workforce
Analysis
Process
Staffing Supply Analysis

The workforce analysis process begins by analyzing supply: the skill mix in the organization as it exists now and the
organization’s future needs based on attrition and strategic growth or adjustment.
Accurate supply forecasts account for movement into and inside the organization (new hires, promotions, and internal
transfers) and out of the organization (resignations, retirements, involuntary terminations, and discharges). Forecast
approaches include a variety of quantitative and qualitative analyses. Analysis tools range from a manager’s “best guess”
to rigorous mathematical applications.
A logical starting place is to consult with line managers and identify how many hours of each type of skilled work are
needed to meet current needs. These current practices must be examined more closely to determine if human resources
are being used effectively and efficiently. Planners may consider possible areas of waste, such as:
Overstaffing that results in a poor ratio of revenue per employee.
Inadequate skills that cause lower productivity levels and/or high error rates and need for rework.
Inappropriate use of employee skills and/or time.
Inefficient work processes.
Inability to flex to changing production requirements.
The result of this analysis is a more accurate rubric showing the resources required to produce a specified amount of
revenue. In addition, if steps are taken to correct these issues, the current supply may be more productive than it appears.
Projections of internal supply might seem to be a simple calculation: Consider the number of people in each job, along
with the number of people who will transfer or who will leave the organization, and the number of people who will be left
provides an estimate of the internal supply.
Unfortunately, reality is rarely that simple. There are many variables involved in forecasting, such as:
Will the jobs remain the same?
What are the anticipated and required employee skill sets?
Will some jobs be eliminated while others are added or combined?
Will historical data hold true in the future?
Will new employees perform comparably to former employees in terms of productivity, punctuality, sick days,
attitudes, and leadership abilities?
As a result, HR professionals use analytical tools to improve their forecasts. Two analytical tools are described in the
Critical Evaluation competency in the HR Competencies module: trend analysis and ratio analysis. We will introduce two
additional tools here that are specific to workforce management: turnover analysis and flow analysis.
Turnover Analysis
Employees may leave an organization for a variety of reasons, such as retirement, resignation, dismissal, layoff, disability,
leave of absence, or death. Turnover is defined as the act of replacing employees leaving an organization or the attrition
or loss of employees. The turnover rate is a metric that is normally expressed using an annualized formula that tracks the
number of separations and the total number of workforce employees per month.
Exhibit 18 shows monthly separations and total workforce numbers for one year at a medical supplies wholesaler, ABC
Medical.
Exhibit 18: Separations at ABC Medical
Month A (separations) B (total workforce)
January 15 250
February 5 245
March 5 240
April 2 238
May 3 235
June 10 225
July 5 220
August 0 220
September 4 216
October 1 215
November 15 200
December 0 200
Total 65 2,704
To calculate the annualized employee turnover percentage, the HR manager:
Divides the total number of employees for the year (2,704) by 12 months. This yields an average monthly workforce
of 225 employees.
Divides the number of separations for the year by the average number of employees per month:
Turnover can also be calculated for shorter time periods (e.g., the first three months of the year), and then the results can
be annualized to project what the annual turnover would be for 12 months.
Two common methods for projecting turnover are:

Examining previous turnover rates and adjusting them to reflect knowledge of changing conditions such as pay rates
and the economy.
Analyzing trends in turnover rates for particular geographic locations or occupational categories.
Flow Analysis
Employees can flow in, up, down, across, and out of an organization, so examining this flow is important in supply
analysis. To accomplish this, HR professionals must separate employees by levels, occupational groupings, or
organizational units.
There are three methods to accomplish flow analysis:
Analyze the career development plans for employees on an aggregate basis by job function, division, or other
organizational classification. Using the target positions for employees and their rating of readiness for the positions
(e.g., immediately, one year, two years), the availability of talent for positions can be projected.
Obtain estimates from each division of transfers and promotions into, out of, and within the divisions. These
estimates may be aggregate and may reflect the subjective probability of movement based on historical data.
Project future movement through statistical analysis. Models of employee flows project the numbers of employees
who will remain in an organizational classification based on past transition rates or probabilities. One caution,
though: Past transition rates and probabilities may have limited value in predicting future trends. Like everything
else, these too are affected by change.
Exhibit 19 shows movement in the shipping department of ABC Medical for the first quarter of the year.
Exhibit 19:
Flow
Analysis
for ABC
Medical
Shipping
Department
This simple flow analysis allows the HR manager to visualize the change in the department and predict future staffing
needs.
Staffing Demand Analysis

Demand analysis considers the model organization of the future and its human capital needs. Once the supply model is
developed, data can be compared to the demand analysis projections and gaps can be identified, including numbers of
employees and gaps in skills.
Demand analysis should not just project the most probable future. Other future scenarios should be considered, as the
potential impact on gaps may be considerably different.
Two techniques used in demand analysis are judgmental forecasts and statistical forecasts. In both, the basic issue is
forecasting the number of employees and the skills required to meet future organizational goals.
Judgmental Forecasts
Judgmental forecasts apply expert judgment to information from the past and present to predict future conditions and
staffing needs and to understand opportunities and threats that can affect the staffing plan.
This information can be gathered using research into industry standards and benchmarks (e.g., productivity and revenue-
generation rules of thumb) as well as the Critical Evaluation competency:
Interviews with management and industry and economic experts
Questionnaires for operational managers
Focus groups with managers, using the nominal group technique and the Delphi technique to focus on likely
outcomes and reach consensus
To effectively use judgmental forecasting, HR needs estimates of:

New positions or skill sets needed.
Positions to be changed, eliminated, or left unfilled.
Job sharing.
Job design needs or organizational structure changes.
Costs of changes.
Adjustments in overhead, contracted labor, and supervision.
As with budgeting, estimating workforce needs can flow from the top down or the bottom up. The success of this method is
entirely dependent upon the quality of information provided to managers to use in making estimates.
Statistical Forecasts
Statistical forecasts generally fall into two categories: regression analysis and simulations. These techniques have many
uses but are illustrated here in the area of workforce planning.
Regression analysis can be subdivided into two types:
Simple linear regression is a projection of future demand based on a past relationship between employment
level and a single variable related to employment. For example, a statistical relationship between gross sales
and the number of employees might be useful in forecasting the number of employees needed in the future if
sales increase by 25%.
Multiple linear regression operates the same as simple linear regression, except that several variables are
used to project future demand. For example, hours of operation might be added to gross sales to determine the
number of employees needed.
Simulations are representations of real situations in abstract form; they are often referred to as “what if” scenarios.
They provide organizations with the opportunity to speculate as to what would happen if certain courses of action are
pursued. For example, an organization might consider the ramifications of changing a compensation system or doing
business online.
Staffing Gap Analysis

The supply analysis identifies the staffing levels and competencies that are currently available, and the demand analysis
determines the staffing levels and competencies that will be needed in the future. The next step in the workforce analysis
process is the gap analysis. This is the process of comparing the supply analysis to the demand analysis to identify the
differences in staffing levels and competencies needed for the future. This process of reconciling the differences between
supply and demand establishes the goals and objectives for the staffing plan. A gap analysis may identify deficiencies in
staffing needs as well as any surplus of staffing levels in certain jobs and/or competencies. A surplus can result from a
number of factors, including operation efficiencies, new technology, lower attrition rates, and changes in the organization.
Examples of staffing gaps are shown in Exhibit 20.
Exhibit 20: Examples of Staffing Gaps
Type of Staffing Gap Description
Skill gap New skills are needed to perform new jobs.
Abilities gap New behaviors are needed to be successful.

Distribution gap Talent is not properly spread throughout the
enterprise.
Diversity gap The organization is too homogeneous.

Deployment gap Talent cannot be sent where it is needed most.
Time gap It takes too long to achieve results.
Cost gap Too much money is being spent on talent acquisition

and development activities.
Knowledge-sharing gap Organizational learning is not occurring.
Succession gap It is not clear where the next generation of leaders will
come from.
Retention gap The best talent is leaving the organization.
Prioritizing Gaps
Once the gaps have been identified, they must be analyzed and prioritized to determine which ones will be addressed.
Rarely can all gaps be addressed at the same time or completed in the one- to three-year time frame of a typical staffing
plan. High-priority gaps are used as the basis for defining the plan’s tactical objectives.
Management and other key stakeholders should be involved when gaps are prioritized. The following criteria can be used
to establish priorities and make recommendations:
Permanence. Does the problem identified in the gap analysis occur on an ongoing basis, or is it due to some
temporary factor that may be resolved without having to take any action?
Impact. How significant is the impact of this gap on the organization compared to other identified gaps?
Control. Does the organization have sufficient resources to address the gap? Will an effective solution use a
reasonable expenditure of resources, or is the solution likely to be more expensive than the problem itself? Will
employees be willing to participate in the solution? For example, because the permanence of a recent increase in
business is uncertain, leadership chooses to meet increased demand by requiring overtime. How will employees
react to a prolonged period of required overtime? Will there be resignations or a decrease in activity or an increase in
accidents or poor quality work?
Evidence. How certain is the quality of the data? Does the evidence provide a clear indication that the gap is a
serious problem, or is more evidence required?
Root cause. To the extent that the gap indicates a problem that needs to be addressed, is it the root cause of the
problem? Or is there a deeper problem that must be fixed to eliminate this gap permanently?
Some gaps may appear unexpectedly. For example, a key executive without a successor may suddenly decide to retire, or
a recently agreed-upon joint venture may require an executive with unique knowledge and skills. These gaps quickly
become high priorities. Other gaps will not come as a surprise, especially if they have been targeted as long-term
objectives in the HR strategic plan. In these cases, the priority may be to simply continue chipping away at the gap,
perhaps at 10% to 20% per year. Exhibit 21 provides examples of gaps in different kinds of enterprises, both global and
domestic.
Exhibit 21: Examples of Staffing Gaps
Future Vision Current State Staffing Gap
All executives will have at least two 15% have met this 85% must be
years’ experience in standard from addressed.
nonheadquarters countries. expatriate or shorter-
term international
assignments.
At least three potential candidates 30% of these positions 70% need
must exist for each senior vice are in compliance. succession plans.
president or managing director
position in the organization.
All senior managers working in the 5% of these employees 95% require

China divisional offices must speak speak Chinese. language training.
Chinese.
Attrition rates for the top 10% of Current attrition rates A gap of 7
scientists and sales are at 14%. percentage points
representatives will be 7% or less. must be closed.
Average time to hire a manager Current time to hire is 25 days must be
needs to be 45 days. 70 days. eliminated.
Defining Tactical Staffing Objectives

High-priority gaps identified in the workforce analysis process are the basis for defining tactical objectives. Tactical
objectives focus on closing high-priority gaps in the near term (as opposed to the long-term HR strategic objectives). They
specify in concrete and measurable terms which gaps must be closed and when.
Tactical objectives may focus on a single functional component of staffing, such as recruitment, selection, or relocation, or
they may apply to multiple functions. For example, improving retention could relate to all three of these staffing functions
and possibly more.
Exhibit 22 shows sample tactical objectives for three staffing gap examples. Note that these tactical objectives take the
organization only part of the way toward its ultimate long-range vision.
Exhibit 22: Examples of Tactical Objectives
Future Vision (Seven

Current State Staffing Gap
Years)
All executives will have at 15% have met this standard 85% must be
least two years’ from expatriate or shorter- addressed.
experience in term international
nonheadquarters assignments.
countries.
Tactical objective: By the end of the fourth quarter of year 2, the 100% goal will
be achieved among all senior-level sales executives. By the same time, the gap
across all executives will be reduced from 85% to 50%.
All senior managers 5% of these employees 95% require language
working in the China speak Chinese. training.
divisional offices must
speak Chinese.
Tactical objective: By the end of year 1, 75% of all senior managers working in
the China divisional offices must be enrolled in intensive training in Chinese for at
least three hours per week. By the end of year 3, 50% of this group of senior
managers must speak Chinese fluently enough to lead a business meeting with
Chinese nationals.
Attrition rates for the top Current attrition rates are at A gap of 7 percentage
10% of scientists and 14%. points must be closed.
sales representatives will
be 7% or less.
Tactical objective: By the end of year 2, attrition rates for the top 10% of
scientists and sales representatives will be reduced to 11%, based on year 2 data
only. By the end of year 3, the attrition rate will be 7%, based on year 3 data only.
(Note: Location X will be exempted from this objective to avoid interference with
their division-wide attrition reduction program.)
These tactical objectives support the organization’s staffing needs because they:
Specify which gaps will receive focused attention.
Describe the degree to which the gap will be closed.
Specify the time frame in which this will be achieved.
Describe the localities or functional groups to which the objectives will apply.
Identify special considerations to be made because of unique local conditions.
Staffing Solution Analysis

The final stage in the workforce analysis process is the solution analysis. This is an examination of how the organization
can get what it needs to meet the tactical objectives within budget constraints. Solution analysis considers whether an
organization should have a continuous recruitment program or wait until vacancies appear before engaging in an intensive
effort to fill openings.
During solution analysis, an organization decides whether to “build,” “buy,” or “borrow” the talent needed to attain the
staffing levels and competencies required to meet the tactical objectives:
“Building” the talent refers to redeploying as well as training and developing the current workforce to meet the future
needs of the organization.
“Buying” the talent refers to recruiting and hiring employees.
“Borrowing” the talent refers to outsourcing, leasing, and contracting with others to get the work done.
Labor market trends should be considered during solution analysis. For example, the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS) conducts ongoing surveys of employers, analyzes the data, and then produces estimates on jobs,
wages, the labor force, employment and unemployment, layoffs, and numerous other workforce-related statistics. Some
state agencies in the U.S. also publish workforce data. The International Labour Organization (ILO) publishes Key
Indicators of the Labour Market, which compiles data from 18 countries.
Census data can also be useful, and it can be easily retrieved online from sites such as the United Nations Statistics
Division, the European Union’s Eurostat, and the U.S. Census Bureau, which includes data for the U.S. and other
countries.
The ultimate goal of the workforce analysis process is to create a staffing plan that will be in alignment with the
organization’s strategic plan and support the future needs of the organization. Founding the staffing plan on data collection
and analysis positions HR as a strategic business partner by ensuring that the right people are in the right place at the
right time.
Staffing Plan
The staffing plan turns workforce analysis data and tactical objectives into reality. A staffing plan describes—in some detail
—how the tactical objectives are going to be achieved through the delegation of tasks and the application of resources.
Planning approaches may vary within organizations, but the important points are that the processes should be:
Consistent with other HR planning initiatives.
Collaborative and easily understood by all participants.
Accepted by those responsible for implementing the plan.
Exhibit 23 lists the common elements of a staffing plan.
Exhibit 23: Elements of a Staffing Plan
Staffing Plan Element Purpose
Statement of purpose Establishes the goals and targets for the staffing
plan
Stakeholders Identifies key decision makers and others who
should be involved in the development of the plan
Activities and tasks Describes the activities and tasks that need to be
carried out and the time line for completion; notes
relationships between activities, tasks, and
deliverables
Team members Identifies all the people who have been assigned or
who have volunteered to work on specific activities,
tasks, and deliverables
Resources Documents financial and nonfinancial resources
required for implementation
Communication plan Notes specific tactics and responsibilities for

communicating initial details about the plan as well
as monitoring the plan and soliciting ongoing
feedback
Continuous improvement Sets up a process to review the extent to which
tactical objectives are achieved; identifies ways to
continuously improve the plan
Involving Key Stakeholders in Developing the Staffing Plan

Key stakeholders are the people who will be affected by the implementation of the staffing plan or whose support will be
needed for its success.
For example, a staffing plan lists a goal of decreasing attrition among its top scientists and sales representatives. There
are several stakeholders in this example:
Scientists and sales representatives. These employees will remain with the organization only if their personal and
professional needs are served better than they were in the past.
Sales managers in each affected division. Some sales managers may prefer to maintain a high attrition rate to
remove low performers.
Managers of research and development. They may wish to have some latitude in defining the criteria and
processes used to identify the top 10% of scientists to ensure that the right people are the ones persuaded to remain
with the organization.
Head of HR. This manager will want to influence how the salary budget will be balanced if the tactics include
increasing salaries.
Heads of the different divisions. They may have very different ideas about what sorts of attrition reduction
techniques will be appropriate for their individual cultures.
The success of the staffing plan will require the support of those expected to carry out the plan’s implementation.
Therefore, it is best to involve a variety of people in the planning process.
Consider the following stakeholders and their potential issues when developing the staffing plan:
Organizational management:
Are they convinced of the strategic value of the staffing plan?
Will they publicly endorse the staffing plan and encourage the support of others?
HR management:
Is there agreement that the staffing plan will support HR’s goals?
Does the staffing plan integrate with plans of other HR functions?
Line management:
Are they convinced that the staffing plan will help meet their business objectives?
Will they actively and publicly support the staffing plan?
Other organizational units:

Have the implications of the staffing plan been discussed with them?
Has the creation of the staffing plan been synchronized with their planning functions?
Union leadership:
Have their concerns been identified in advance to avoid unexpected conflict?
Can the staffing plan be devised to support union goals while still meeting organizational goals?
Identifying Resources Needed to Create the Staffing Plan
Resource requirements should be addressed during staffing plan development so they do not surface as a surprise during
implementation. Requirements may be financial, human, or physical. They may exist internally or may have to be obtained
from external sources. Resources usually include:
Budget—for example, fees for recruiting firms, advertising and job posting costs.
A project schedule that meets the organization’s planning needs but is also realistic.
A staffing plan team of sufficient size and with adequate availability. Tasks span all aspects of the staffing plan—from
planning through implementation to assessment. Members may perform staffing plan tasks in addition to their
regular assignments.
The knowledge required to shape the plan to specific stakeholder circumstances—for example, previous experience
with restructuring initiatives, insight gained from a SWOT analysis or analysis of succession plans.
Equipment, facilities, and materials—for example, videoconferencing equipment for interviews or access fees to
premium recruitment sites/services.
Logistical support—for example, analysis and IT services.
Communicating the Staffing Plan

Communication requires particular attention in the design of a staffing plan. Often neglected, it is essential for the plan’s
long-term success. Communication of the plan begins during the development of the specific tactics, continues as the plan
is finalized, and is used to support the plan’s implementation. Ongoing encouragement and support are required because
the tactics are implemented by and require the continuous insight and commitment of the affected departments. In
addition, ongoing feedback from those implementing the plan is crucial to those responsible for developing and monitoring
the staffing plan.
Exhibit 24 lists the components of a communication plan.
Exhibit 24: Components of Communication Plan in Support of Staffing

Plan
Communication
Description
Component
Audience Who requires information about the plan or its

implementation for it to be successful by country and
function?
Objectives What specific outcomes are to be achieved through
communication, and how will these ensure the success
of the staffing plan?
Required information Exactly what information must be communicated to the
various audiences?
Who will provide the information?
How does the required information vary by country?
Modes of What type of communication will be most effective

communication (e.g., face-to-face, formal announcements, training
programs, frequent e-mail updates)?
What variations in the communication mode are
required for specific countries and cultures?
Resources What financial and nonfinancial resources must be
committed to communications for the plan to be
successful?
Are these resources available in the required countries,
or must headquarters provide them?
Timing What schedule is required to achieve the objectives of
the communication plan?
Responsibility and Who will actually develop and deliver the required
accountability communications? Who is accountable for the
achievement of the goals of the communication plan at
different levels?
Continuously Improving the Staffing Plan

The purpose of continuous improvement is to identify opportunities for improvement as soon as possible, to document
lessons learned from the experience, and to ensure that these lessons are used to enhance ongoing and future staffing
initiatives.
Exhibit 25 is a checklist for continuously improving the staffing plan.
Exhibit 25: Continuous Improvement Checklist for Staffing Plans
Continuous Improvement of Staffing Plans
Have criteria and standards been Have problem-identification and

defined for all outcomes and problem-solving processes been built
processes described in the staffing into the plans? Are these consistent
plan? with specific operations?
Have these criteria and standards Have arrangements been made to
been adjusted, when necessary, to collect lessons learned during the
account for specific conditions? implementation of the plan and
Have the processes outlined in the shared across the organization?
plan been analyzed for efficiency and Is an ongoing measurement function
for integration with other in place to monitor the quality of the
organizational processes? plan implementation?
Are the related processes within Are open-ended dialogues, such as
other departments equally well milestone meetings, a key part of the
defined and implemented, or do project plan?
contingencies need to be developed?
As the staffing plan is implemented, those involved will observe the process and look for ways to improve it.
Workforce Management Strategies

Supports strategies for restructuring the organization’s workforce (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, downsizing).
Coordinates with business leaders to create strategies (e.g., succession planning, leadership development, training)
that address the organization’s leadership needs.
Develops strategies for restructuring the organization’s workforce (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, downsizing).

Approaches to restructuring (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, downsizing).
Leadership development and planning (e.g., high-potential development programs).
Succession planning programs and techniques.
Workforce Management Strategies
Organizations can use a variety of strategies to attain their strategic goals. Some, like flexible staffing and restructuring,
apply to specific organizational needs. Others, like talent management and succession planning, are general strategies
found in most future-oriented organizations.
The HR business partner (HR BP) who supports the operations division of a furniture manufacturer sits through a cross-
divisional design review that evaluates the designs, production capability, and potential market reach for a new line of
office furnishings. In this review, significant gaps in coordination and communication are surfaced in how the organization
collaborates and integrates its work efforts.
The chief operating officer asks the VP of operations to pull together a series of cross-divisional teams to identify and
assess the risks associated with these gaps and put practices in place to address them. Separately, following a
conversation with the VP of HR, the HR business partner learns that the CEO wants to identify development opportunities
for recently identified high potentials (Hi-Pos).
Because the HR BP has developed her Business Acumen and Consultation competencies, she sees an opportunity to link
what organizational leaders see as separate business needs into one effort that meets the objectives of both needs and
minimizes stress on the organization from extra work. The HR BP also sees a unique chance to create excellent
development opportunities for the identified Hi-Pos. It would put them in a position to study the organization’s integrated
product development practices inclusive of all key organizational stakeholders in the market analysis, design, and
manufacturing of new product lines.
These Hi-Pos would gain increased exposure to other organizational elements and learn and better understand the
interfaces and would need to identify, sell, and institute new organization practices. They would also get exposure to, and
scrutiny from, the senior management team. The senior management team, in turn, would get fresh eyes on the problem,
the chance to test and assess their developing talent and build the talent pool, and diminish organizational stress by
addressing two business needs with one coordinated process.
The HR BP creates a proposal and business case for aligning these efforts that highlights the benefits of this approach
and addresses any potential challenges to it. After soliciting and obtaining support from the HR VP, the BP gets the
backing of the CEO and COO and other organizational leaders.
Pulling together these two business needs into one effort that addresses the needs of both highlights the HR BP’s
understanding of where business needs (the gap analysis effort) can be met by a key HR process (developing key talent).
This aligns a key operational need with an important HR strategic process.
The HR BP demonstrates the ability to understand organizational strategies and apply this knowledge to create a plan for
effective growth by:
Aligning HR strategy, goals, and objectives to organizational strategy and objectives.
Evaluating all proposed business cases for HR projects and initiatives.
Examining all organizational problems in terms of integrating HR solutions to maximize return on investment (ROI),
profit, revenue, and strategic effectiveness.
Ensuring that the ROI for all HR initiatives adds to organizational value.
Flexible Staff Alternatives
No workforce planning and employment strategy is complete without consideration of flexible staffing alternatives. Also
referred to as alternative staffing, flexible staffing uses alternative recruiting sources and workers who are not regular
employees. Many staffing approaches are possible other than conventional full-time arrangements where the organization
directly hires, supervises, and provides compensation and benefits to regular employees.
Today’s labor market presents many situations where flexible staffing alternatives are appropriate. Examples include:
Shortages of available workers for open positions.
Seasonal peak demands for operations.
Operational upturns and downturns that make permanent head count impractical.
Special projects that demand specific skills.
As organizations look for cost-effective and creative ways to recruit just-in-time talent and ensure the organization’s
success and growth, flexible staffing offers employers several desirable alternatives.
Types of Flexible or Alternative Staff

No one-size-fits-all solution to flexible staffing exists. The influence of local laws, culture, and practices makes universal
solutions impossible. Many organizations benefit from employing a variety of flexible staff simultaneously. Exhibit 26
summarizes key characteristics for some of the more prevalent types of flexible staff, organized according to whether the
employees are on an organization’s payroll or administration functions are outsourced to staffing firms.
Exhibit 26: Types of Flexible Staff
Staff Option Description
Flexible Staffing Administration by the Organization
Temporary Employees hired to work on a specified job to supplement the regular

assignments workforce on a short-term basis or for a specific period of time.
Temporary Employees hired to work directly on the organization’s payroll on a short-
employees term basis or for a specific period of time to rotate among several positions
or departments as needed.
On-call workers Employees who report to work only when needed.
Part-time Employees scheduled to work less than a regular workweek on an ongoing

employees basis; benefits eligibility may depend on various factors (e.g., number of
hours worked).
Job sharing The practice of having two different employees performing the tasks of one
full-time position. Each of the job-sharing partners works a part-time
schedule, but together they are accountable for the duties of one full-time
position. Communication between the two employees is a key to success.
Seasonal workers Part-time or “casual” workers hired to perform seasonal work in a variety of
industries (e.g., agriculture, construction, tourism, and recreation); may or
may not be eligible for benefits (e.g., paid time off).
Phased retirement Any work arrangement that falls somewhere in between full-time retirement
and working full-time; these types of programs allow mature employees to
work on a reduced or modified basis as they approach retirement.
Flexible Staffing Administration Outsourced

Finite temporary Workers who are recruited, screened, and employed by a temporary help
help firm; the temporary firm assigns individuals to work at client sites for a finite
duration (e.g., to cover an employee’s medical/maternity leave).
Temp-to-hire Workers hired on a temporary basis (usually through a temporary firm) with
programs the understanding that they may be offered regular employment if they
perform competently for a specified time.
Contract workers Highly skilled workers (e.g., engineers, data processing specialists)
supplied for long-term projects; under contract between the organization
and a technical services firm.
Terminology for these staffing approaches varies: temporary workers, contingent workforce, free agents. The essential
idea is to carry human resource capacity when it can be fully used.
Types of Flexible Staffing Arrangements

Employers can define their relationship with staffing firms through different service arrangements. The choice of a
particular flexible arrangement depends on a variety of operational, financial, and legal factors, including:
The function to be performed.
The level of supervision required.
Time constraints.
Financial constraints.
Concerns about legal risks and liability.
Again, the influence of local laws, culture, and practices makes universal solutions impossible.
The more prevalent flexible staffing service arrangements are summarized in Exhibit 27.
Exhibit 27: Types of Flexible Staffing Arrangements
Service
Description
Arrangement
Payrolling An organization identifies specific people and refers them to

a staffing firm, which employs them and assigns them to
work at the organization; arrangement is usually at a lower
cost than traditional (finite) temporary help.
Employee leasing In an explicit joint venture, an organization transfers all or

or professional substantially all employees at a discrete site or facility to the
employer payroll of an employee leasing firm; the PEO leases
organization (PEO) employees back to the organization while handling most of
the HR administrative functions (e.g., payroll, benefits).
Temp-to-lease An organization contracts with two (usually affiliated)
programs staffing firms—generally a temporary service and a PEO;
the temporary firm assigns long-term temporaries to a client
organization and, after a period of time, the employees are
promoted to lease status and become eligible for benefits
from the PEO.
Outsourcing or An independent organization with expertise in operating a

managed services specific function contracts with an organization to assume
full responsibility for the function (as opposed to just
supplying personnel); functions may be peripheral to the
core business (e.g., security, food services) or closer to
operations (such as managing all flexible staffing programs
or the IT function).
The term co-employment , or joint employment , generally describes a situation in which an organization shares
responsibility and liability for their alternative workers with the alternative staffing supplier. A co-employment agreement
summarizes the legal relationship, rights, and obligations for some flexible staffing arrangements. Potential liability can
vary dramatically depending upon the nature of the staffing agreement. In traditional temporary staffing models, the
staffing firm and the client organization are most likely viewed as co-employers or joint employers under most employment
law regulations. The less control one organization has over the terms and conditions of employment, the more difficult it
becomes to prove that a co-employment relationship exists.
Independent Contractors
Employers often use independent contractors (also known as consultants or freelancers) rather than employees to gain
greater workplace flexibility or manage uncertainty associated with entering a new market. A related concept is the
“economically dependent worker,” defined as a worker who is formally self-employed but who derives most of his or her
income from one employer.
Depending on the characteristics of a particular arrangement, these workers may be seen as employees under some
countries’ laws. They therefore create a risk of noncompliance with a country’s employment, business, and tax laws. The
penalties can be significant. Employers may have to pay benefits retroactively to individuals found to be de facto
employees. Employers may have to officially register their organizations in a country before using contractors based there.
If they do not, the employer may be heavily fined, and prospects for future operation in the country may become more
uncertain.
To avoid these issues, HR and legal counsel should develop a process and guidelines/definitions for using independent
contractors and should communicate that information clearly throughout the organization. To reinforce the nature of the
independent relationship, the contractor should retain control (for the most part) over when, where, and how the work is
done. Contracts should avoid requirements commonly associated with actual employment, such as dictating the
contractor’s hours of work. Payment should be tied to deliverables rather than a schedule.
HR professionals should be wary about the protection that a contract provides in the eyes of governments. Governments
are likely to use the appearance of the working relationship rather than the formal terms of a contract to determine whether
a worker is a regular employee or an independent contractor—in other words, does the contractor look and act like a de
facto employee?
When possible, employers should hire employees outright or lease them from another employer who takes responsibility
for compliance with employment regulations.
Regular audits of HR practices should include inspection of the use of independent contractors.
HR's Role in Flexible Staffing

Once an organization decides on a flexible staffing arrangement, the terms of the contract must be put into writing.
Certainly, the substance of any flexible staffing agreement is straightforward: to produce skilled and qualified people to
perform specific tasks. But reaching consensus on the specific mechanics of the arrangement requires much attention to
detail.
It has been said that agreements do not create an understanding; they record it. Thus, the best agreement is one that
accurately and precisely reflects the underlying transaction. Depending on the staffing alternative, HR may need to work
with legal counsel experienced in writing staffing contracts when orchestrating the terms for flexible staffing.
The terms of a flexible agreement will naturally vary depending on the circumstances. But there are a few general
guidelines that can be helpful.
Be cautious of preprinted or standard forms. You must understand and agree with everything in the agreement;
anything you don’t understand should be explained to your satisfaction or it should be eliminated.
Ensure clarity. An agreement should be simple and straightforward. Respective rights and obligations of both sides
must be defined. Ambiguous provisions subject to later interpretation are dangerous.
Negotiate competitive pricing. Ask for volume discounts, rebates based on use, and free value-added services.
Consider including an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provision. It’s wise to be prepared should disputes
arise.
Include a simple opt-out procedure. Be wary of fixed-term agreements. The organization should be able to opt out
of an agreement if dissatisfied for any reason.
Negotiate clear and precise provisions for what happens when the agreement expires or the relationship
ends. Spelling out terms of the closing can help to prevent unnecessary litigation.
Organizational Restructuring
Restructuring is the act of reorganizing legal, ownership, operational, or other organizational structures. It is a proactive
adjustment to meet changing business needs.
Restructuring intersects with workforce management when an organization makes changes in the size, number, or
relationship of departments. After restructuring, certain groups will report to different departments; some new departments
may be created while others are disbanded.
HR plays a crucial role in restructuring, helping the organization “right-size” resources relative to market demand or take
advantage of cost synergies after a merger, acquisition, or joint venture. Restructuring can also release least-productive
resources and cut costs to boost profitability. Organizational effectiveness interventions may be required to help affected
employees through the period of transition, equip them with new skills and processes, manage changes in organizational
cultures, and establish new structures (e.g., decision making, team building).
Drivers of Restructuring
Organizations restructure for a number of reasons. Dr. Gaanyesh Kulkarni, CEO and Principle Consultant of envertis, a
Mumbai-based consultancy, identifies four major drivers of restructuring:
Strategy. When organizations change their strategy, they may create new divisions to facilitate new products or
services or to move into new markets. The new strategy may mean staff increases in some areas and decreases in
others, which will then require restructuring.
Structure. Organizations may rearrange their structure to follow a new business model, improve efficiency, or
reduce costs. Restructuring is then required to meet the needs of the new organization.
Downsizing. Organizations commonly downsize to remain functional during a loss of revenue. They may choose to
close departments, drop product lines, lay off staff, or sell facilities. Restructuring may then be required to meet the
needs of the new, smaller organization.
Expansion. When an organization expands, new departments may be required to accommodate new products or
facilities. The structure is then rearranged to include new staff and departments.
Redistribution of Decision-Making Authority

As organizations grow larger, traditional decision-making processes may become so cumbersome that the organizations
become dangerously slow in responding to competitive threats or technological changes and opportunities. As a result,
decision-making authority may move downward in the organization—toward line managers—and outward—from
headquarters to field.
These shifts affect HR as well. The responsibilities in the operational HR role will continue to be shared with line
management. A variety of activities, such as recruiting for open positions and resolving employee complaints, are daily
management functions that can often be handled by or shared with the line manager.
The shift in responsibilities to line managers may require a matching decentralization of HR, a sharing with line
management of some of the historical HR functions, or a relocation of many operational activities from headquarters to
regional offices.
The Extended Organization

The extended organization is becoming more common today as supply chain partners create processes and information
channels that allow their organizations to communicate and collaborate fluidly at many different functional points. The
businesses remain separate entities but may appear to outsiders to be one entity.
Extended organizations are formed through the use of outsourcing, strategic alliances, or partnerships.
Key Content
HR may be involved in performing due diligence in implementing these relationships. Due diligence is the process of
investigating a decision thoroughly before finalizing it to identify all potential factors that could affect the positive and
negative impacts of the decision.
By practicing due diligence before implementing a supplier or partner relationship, HR helps make sure that the other
parties in the relationship conform to international labor standards and local laws and ethical expectations. This helps
manage risk to the organization’s reputation and its legal liability.
In strategic alliances and partnerships, HR can also help identify competencies needed for liaison positions and consult on
team-building and communication processes.
M&A and Divestiture

Organizations may also try to enhance their productivity and competitiveness by adding to the value of the firm (e.g.,
increasing assets or accessing new markets) through merger and acquisition (M&A) or by shedding assets that do not
contribute to the bottom line through divestiture.
In both cases, restructuring is required to align leadership and functions.
Due Diligence in M&As

An important HR role in M&A is in the due diligence process, identifying wide-ranging workforce issues that may result
from the change:
Structural issues, such as the duplication of work processes and personnel, differences in organizational culture,
conflicts in HR policies and practices, the arrangement of reporting relationships, titles, the design of how the
organizations interact with customers/clients, and the relationships with vendors
Technological considerations, such as direct product/service provisions; mechanisms for communication and data
tracking; the use, type, and impact of each organization’s enterprise management tools; and the ability for integration
of the technology
Financial considerations, such as the compensation structure, union contracts, obligations to a union pension fund,
stock options, incentive plans, and the full range of benefits administration
Legal issues, such as reporting requirements that differ by jurisdiction or type of business, legal constraints on the
closing of facilities or elimination of redundant personnel, and benefit and nonbenefit issues (e.g., severance and tax
codes)
Because of the critical nature of the decision, due diligence investigation for M&A and divestiture should use multiple
sources and industry and local contacts and experts.
Exhibit 28 lists typical factors HR should include in its due diligence investigation. Many of these topics are the same as
HR might use in an annual survey of its workforce status.
Exhibit 28: HR Due Diligence Topics for M&A Strategies
HR Due Diligence Topics for M&A Strategies
Management Work environment

Talent of current managers at top Employee attitudes
and middle levels Employee engagement
Anticipated level of post-M&A Type of worker representation and
motivation of managers participation
Likelihood of retaining top Rates of absenteeism and disability
management Safety records
Management pay structure Complaints filed with regulatory
Ability to recruit top managers agencies
Management style Community labor environment
Centralized vs. decentralized? Union climate
Paternalistic? Authoritarian? Availability of necessary skills
Collaborative?
Current HR function
Distance of management style
from that of own organization In-house or outsourced?
Probability that managers will be Future plan
able to adapt to new style HR policies and procedures
Culture Written or unwritten policies and
Alignment of stated values with procedures
leaders’ actions Compatibility with own policies and
How things happen every day procedures
Decision making (e.g., amount of Other required policies (such as
autonomy, levels of approval diversity in hiring)
required) Effect of future business strategy
“Silo” internal structure HR activities needed to support
Perception of internal and external business strategy (examples include
customers hiring and closing of operations)
Learning and development
Hidden costs of acquisition
philosophy (e.g., who receives
training, how learning is perceived Special contract terms with
and delivered, how much money is management
spent on it) Benefit plans and transferability to new
Age and diversity of workers employees
Pension plan status (adequacy of
General employee information
funding, distribution, retention of
Types of employees (full-time, unvested percentage)
part-time) Separation and incentive pay plans
Local customs of employment Compensation packages
Retention plans, if applicable Pending lawsuits and judgments
Key Content
Throughout the M&A process, the job of HR is to maintain focus on the “people” dimension while it conducts HR due
diligence and plans the M&A HR integration strategy, implements, and monitors and evaluates.
Planning the M&A Process

After due diligence research, HR can begin to map and compare the two organizations’ structures and processes and
decide how to manage differences. Key talent can be identified and plans laid for retaining it. The HR integration plan
should include:
Designating integration leaders.
Securing management support and resources.
Developing integration and communication plans, setting measurable objectives for integration, and establishing a
realistic time line.
Implementing the M&A Plan

Since post-M&A integration generally means streamlining the workforce and reconciling multiple compensation systems,
HR focuses on:
Communicating honestly and quickly, before incorrect rumors spread and take hold.
Making required changes quickly—where this is possible. Part of the due diligence process is identifying restrictions
on implementation, such as laws affecting acquired rights (existing obligations of merged or acquired entities),
workforce terminations, and job reassignments.
Supporting efforts to blend or revise work processes—perhaps by using cross-cultural task forces.
HR also ensures that stakeholders—such as vendors or supply chain partners and affected communities—are included in
both planning and implementation.
After the M&A

In the period after the merger or acquisition, HR monitors for signs of problems and responds appropriately. It implements
various initiatives, such as communicating mission and values, to build cohesion. It begins the process of analyzing its
strategy and evaluating its success, with an eye toward identifying best practices for future M&As.
Due Diligence in Divestiture

HR must also conduct due diligence in a divestiture. HR must analyze the skills and functions of the divested unit and, if
the divestiture leaves a gap, determine if the cost of filling the gap outweighs the financial benefits of the divestiture. If
divestiture is considered the better option, this is still a major change initiative and must be approached as such. The
potential loss of working relationships and necessary changes in work processes require the same type of planning,
implementation to plan, and monitoring as with M&As.
Reduction in Force
Reduction in force (RIF) , or downsizing , refers to the termination of employment of individual employees or groups of
employees for reasons other than performance—i.e., economic necessity or restructuring.
The process for determining which employees will be affected by an RIF may depend on different factors. HR
professionals should be aware of national and local labor laws and union contracts that affect an employer’s ability to
reduce the size of its workforce. Employers usually consider skills, work record, and seniority. A straight seniority approach
is most objective but may not meet the employer’s long-term needs. In workforce reductions that affect professional
workers, less consideration is customarily given to seniority and more is given to the performance and skills the future
organization will require.
Possible alternatives to downsizing include asking employees to sustain pay cuts, offering voluntary termination and/or
retirement with additional benefits, or asking employees to accept a reduced work schedule.
HR’s Role During RIF

During a RIF, HR can help the retained employees confront challenges such as:
Diminished job security.
Increased workload.
Different work assignments.
Changed organizational priorities.
Departure of leaders/managers who once defined the organization’s character.
Departure of long-term employees who were knowledgeable about operations.
Loss of colleagues, possibly friends (“survivor guilt”).
Fear that their own jobs may be in jeopardy, causing them to look for other employment.
HR’s Role After RIF

HR can take the following measures after the RIF:
Clearly communicate the rationale for the new goals and structures.
Provide employees with specific examples of behaviors that are appreciated as well as what will not be tolerated.
Ensure that the transition period is short; the longer things get dragged out, the more likely employees are to view
the situation as leadership failure.
Support leaders and managers in leading by example and helping employees see how new challenges can be met.
Clearly define job definitions and responsibilities.
Realign rewards as necessary to support organizational goals.
Talent Management
Talent management refers to the development and integration of HR processes that attract, develop, engage, and retain
the knowledge, skills, and abilities of employees that will meet current and future organizational needs. The purpose of
talent management is to increase workplace productivity by supporting the recruitment, development, engagement, and
retention of high-value employees.
Effective talent management therefore requires:

Understanding the implications of the organization’s business strategy in terms of required competencies. Talent
management is a strategic approach to managing human capital and as such must be aligned with the organization’s
strategy and strategic business goals. It should be perceived as a long-term and continuous process that is most
effective when it is an integrated effort and is perceived as continuous and dynamic, always evolving with the
strategic direction of the organization.
Tracking external conditions that affect the availability of talent, such as highly competitive job markets, demographic
conditions (e.g., bulges in the size of certain population age ranges), or changes in technology that call for new
knowledge and skills.
Reflecting the organization’s values and commitment to diversity, equity, and employee development. An effective
talent management strategy is shaped by an organization’s:
Expectations regarding the differentiation of talent.
Overall philosophy regarding integration versus local differentiation.
View of the role that line leaders have in the development of people.
Philosophy regarding the movement of people across borders, businesses, and functions.
View of the role of diversity in staffing strategy.
Beliefs about hiring for potential versus hiring for position.
Committing to creating a positive workplace and an engaged workforce.
Talent Pools
The creation and management of formal talent pools is a critical aspect of an organization’s talent management strategy.
Members of a specific talent pool (e.g., high-potential employees or potential global assignees) are employees who meet a
set of formal identification criteria. These employees typically receive specialized development and enrichment
experiences above those associated with traditional employee development.
A growing number of organizations are investing in the development of sophisticated applications, such as applicant
tracking systems and talent management suites, to help them stay in touch with and develop strong relationships with both
internal and external members of essential talent pools.
Talent pools:
Represent an essential component of strategic business planning. When talent management is carefully aligned with
long-term business and strategic planning, the organization can develop a well-planned approach to giving
employees who have specific skill sets the developmental experiences they need to prepare them for the future.
Allow the organization to maximize and more effectively target employee and career development efforts.
Can be a useful tool for identifying and cataloging the developmental experiences of employees who are candidates
for future international assignments.
Represent a valuable resource during crisis management. When an organization makes the effort to identify and
catalog critical skill sets and experiences, they can quickly draw on these resources to fill in or supplement workforce
gaps in times of organizational crisis.
Some additional uses for talent pools include the following:

Talent pools can be used to help organizations identify and recognize the value of solid performers—those
individuals who keep the organization running on a daily basis but are not typically singled out for recognition or
special development experiences because they are not part of or have not expressed interest in specialized talent
pools.
Defined talent pools may aid in clarifying or guiding compensation decisions to be sure key talent (including high
potentials and leadership candidates) is rewarded and motivated.
Talent pools represent an additional contributor to effective knowledge management, especially in global
organizations. Talent pools of functional experts and historians serve a vital function in preserving essential
knowledge and proprietary information.
Talent management resources can be directed broadly—for example, to develop high-potential employees throughout the
organization. Alternatively, employers may choose to target their talent management initiatives at pivotal or key talent
pools, employees who will have the most impact on the organization’s success in implementing its strategy and achieving
its goals.
Developing pivotal talent requires a deep understanding of the organization’s strategy and what types of activities have the
greatest impact on measurable success and then focusing development efforts on the employees performing those
activities. For example, if an organization creates its competitive advantage primarily by regularly introducing innovative
products, HR may discover that the organization’s pivotal talent pool is employees involved in designing and developing
those products. Alternatively, an organization that competes on the basis of premium service to its high-value customers
may focus its talent management on the employees who interact with customers.
Key Content
As part of their talent management responsibilities, human resource professionals must be able to anticipate the future
talent needs of the organization and foresee what the potential employee pool will look like when those organizational
needs become a reality. Used appropriately, talent pools can be created and developed to fill the gaps between the talent
that the organization will need and the talent that is likely to be available.
Measuring Talent Management Effectiveness

All talent management programs should be evaluated on a regular basis to ensure the effectiveness of each program in
helping to maintain a high-performance workforce. Methods for measuring talent management effectiveness include:
Evaluating the percentage of positions for which there are internal successors.
Comparing the number of external hires to internal promotions.
Evaluating the differentiation of pay between performance levels.
Identifying high-potential employees and reviewing their corresponding retention rates.
Tracking retention and turnover rates at all levels of the organization.
Successful practices should be identified and repeated.
Succession Planning
Succession planning is an important talent management strategy to help identify and foster the development of high-
potential employees. Succession plans focus on positions that are the most critical to the future needs of the organization.
The goal is to “keep talent in the pipeline” and have people in place for future roles in the organization.
It is important to recognize that succession planning, like other aspects of talent management, applies to employees at all
levels of the organization. It should not be applied exclusively to senior management.
Succession planning must be closely tied to and aligned with several other human resource management functions,
including:
Career management. Succession plans help to ensure that individuals in specific talent pools obtain the insights,
awareness, and field experience necessary to make ongoing contributions to the organization.
Training and learning. Structured training experiences provide the knowledge and skills necessary for success in
various positions on the career advancement ladder.
Performance management. Succession planning must also be carefully aligned with the organization’s
performance management process to ensure that future managers and functional experts receive the ongoing
developmental feedback, critical evaluation, and mentoring required to maintain their professional development.
Succession planning is a strategy that targets long-range needs and focuses on the cultivation of talent to satisfy those
needs. Replacement planning concentrates on immediate needs and a “snapshot” assessment of the availability of
qualified backup for individuals in key positions. Replacement planning is an important element in business continuity
planning in the event of an emergency or business interruption.
Exhibit 29 compares succession planning and replacement planning.
Exhibit 29: Succession vs. Replacement Planning
Variable Succession Planning Replacement Planning
Time frame 12–36 months 0–12 months
Readiness Candidate with the best Best candidate available

development potential
Commitment Merely possibilities until Designated preferred
level vacancies occur replacement candidate
Planning Pool of talented candidates with Vertical lines of succession
focus capabilities for several within units or functions
assignments
Planning Specific plans and goals set for Usually informal, status
development the individual report on strengths and
weaknesses
Flexibility Flexible plans that are intended Limited by plan structure;
to promote development and however, in practice has a
thinking about alternatives great deal of flexibility
Plan basis Result of input and discussion Each manager’s best
among multiple managers judgment based on
observation and experience
Evaluation Multiple evaluations by different Observation of performance
managers on different on the job over time;
assignments; testing and demonstrated competence;
broadening early in career progress through the unit
An important aspect of retention is to retain high performers in the organization. Succession planning demonstrates to
employees that the organization has an interest in their knowledge and skills and is committed to their career
development. By identifying crucial job skills, knowledge, social relationships, and organizational practices and passing
those on through succession planning, employers help to ensure the seamless movement of talent within the organization.
Succession planning also has the potential to help organizations withstand times of demographic change and talent
scarcity. Succession planning enables organizations to harvest critical organizational knowledge so it can be shared with
subsequent generations of workers.
Succession Planning Process

An effective succession plan process incorporates seven components, as shown in Exhibit 30.
Exhibit 30: Components of Successful Succession Plans
Components of Successful Succession Plans
Visible support from senior Use of succession planning to

leadership and all members of top reinforce organizational culture
management Process that focuses heavily but not
Clearly defined leadership criteria exclusively on leadership
Defined plan to find, retain, and development
motivate future leaders and high- Process that is a real organizational
potential employees priority
Simple, easy-to-follow, measurable
process
Careful thought should be given to selecting candidates for succession planning so that individuals with development
potential are chosen. Although succession plans typically identify current management employees, nonmanagement
employees who show promise should not be overlooked.
Once candidates have been selected, well-conceived training and development are critical to preparing candidates to step
in and take charge of the targeted positions. HR has an important role in determining the most efficient and cost-effective
method(s) to develop employees for the future.
Developing future leaders may include in-house training, mentoring, coursework from outside sources, or special projects
specifically designed for the employee. Whichever techniques are chosen, the training should be aligned with the
succession plan and the overall organizational strategy.
Common mistakes made in succession planning include:

Basing future staffing needs on only past or current experiences.
Developing succession plans in isolation.
Making it a once-a-year event instead of an ongoing management activity.
Evaluating Succession Planning Effectiveness

As with all planning activities, succession planning must be evaluated to determine its effectiveness.
At the onset of succession planning, standards should be established about what success looks like and metrics identified
as to how program success will be measured. Standards and metrics used to evaluate succession planning will vary but
should generally attempt to assess:
Employee satisfaction with personal development initiatives.
Management satisfaction with employee performance and job readiness.
The extent of goals achieved and the time to full-function attainment.
Changes in organizational management are inevitable. Positions become vacant due to retirement, resignation, death,
new business opportunities, terminations due to employee performance, or other reasons. Succession planning helps to
provide continuity in leadership and avoid extended and costly vacancies in key positions.
Knowledge Management


Best practices and techniques for knowledge management, retention, and transfer.
Knowledge Management
Knowledge management (KM) is the process of creating, acquiring, sharing, and managing knowledge to augment
individual and organizational performance. Effective knowledge management can maintain organizational effectiveness as
the workforce changes over time.
An HR manager hears about friction between the operations and quality control (QC) departments in the
organization. Calling on his Relationship Management competency, the HR manager realizes that a group meeting with
both leaders will not be productive. So the manager interviews each separately about possible causes for the poor
relationship and then objectively analyzes their responses. Behind their answers, the HR manager sees a tendency for
both areas to control information tightly. Operations believes that QC’s involvement always increases their work, and so
they tend to withhold information about iterations of designs and trial results. QC believes that operations will select only
the data they want and so presents only summaries of results from their reviews.
The HR manager works with the department managers and employees from both groups to better understand the situation
and their concerns/perspectives on sharing information outside their departments. The Communication competency
supports this task.
The HR manager applies his Consultation competency to his sense of the situation and proposes a formal knowledge
management system to capture vital operations and quality control information and explains the benefits of using the
system to the department leaders. The system would provide QC with a more complete picture of the design process and
operations with a more detailed understanding of the quality tests being applied and their results. It would also allow the
departments to schedule their work more efficiently.
To develop the knowledge management system, the HR manager utilizes techniques to address the hesitancy of and
reduce the conflict between the two departments (using the Consultation skills related to managing change). A workshop
is held with respected employees from each department who have been identified as having good relationship skills. The
team identifies and agrees on system objectives and criteria. Gradually the departments begin to trust each other.
Knowledge Management Systems
In today’s complex and highly competitive environment, an organization must capture, house, and share its knowledge,
information, practices, and policies. It is equally important to prevent the knowledge loss that can occur through layoffs,
retirements, reassignments, and voluntary resignations.
Knowledge management programs typically focus on two key elements:

Expertise sharing and organizational learning
Knowledge retention and the reduction of knowledge loss due to employee attrition
HR professionals play a key role in fostering KM. They instill a knowledge-sharing attitude in new employees and use
training and performance management systems to encourage creativity, innovation, and knowledge transfer.
There are many types of information that can be the focus of organizational KM efforts, such as:
Leadership characteristics and behaviors.
Supplier management information and techniques.
Process control in operations.
Information management practices, techniques, and specifications.
Problem-solving techniques.
Innovation best practices.
People commitment procedures, policies, and practices.
Customer satisfaction practices, programs, skills, and techniques.
New product, service, or technology launch and introduction practices.
Change management practices and capabilities.
Establishing a Formal Knowledge Management System

Knowledge management systems in organizations tend to be either informal or formal. Informal systems arise as
employees and teams gain experience and develop the ability to recognize and identify critical information, best practices,
and experiences. While informal systems are very influential and important to organizations, they tend to be based on
personal networks and consist heavily of personal contact information. Formal systems are characterized by a structured,
formal procedure for capturing information and a specific repository for the information that is gathered.
Exhibit 31 describes the steps to create a formal KM system.
Exhibit 31: Steps to Create a Formal Knowledge Management System
Step Description
1 Inventory This step involves cataloging the organization’s

knowledge assets. collection of tangible assets. Collections often include
white papers, proposals, presentations, business and
marketing plans, and growth and expansion plans.
Some components of information systems (e.g.,
connections and lists of employees with specific skills,
experiences, and assignment responsibilities) are
also commonly added to the inventory.
2 Create a knowledge Typically, an organization’s library or knowledge

repository and repository is available over its intranet or through a
directory. dedicated application. The access tool must be quick
and easy to use and have a powerful search
capability. More sophisticated systems, such as
human capital management systems, may offer the
ability to forecast information for new projects and
assign team members based on skill and experience
matches.
3 Encourage system This step involves implementing communication,
use. training, and other processes designed to ensure
cultural applicability and overall acceptance of the
system. If the system is not perceived as essential to
the successful operation of the organization, its
success is uncertain.
4 Update the system. While keeping the database up-to-date often

represents a challenge for the organization,
continuous updates are essential to ensure the
integrity and credibility of the system.
Uses of Knowledge Management Systems

Organizations adopt and use KM systems in a variety of ways:
KM systems have been implemented by law enforcement agencies to manage large volumes of information while
streamlining and systematizing each step of criminal investigations.
A growing number of retailers such as Walmart are mining their knowledge databases to identify consumer buying
trends. By identifying items that consumers frequently purchase at the same time, retailers can create point-of-
purchase and other product promotions to spur sales of multiple products.
Pharmaceutical companies such as Eli Lilly often use knowledge management systems to help them manage the
exceptionally long product development and approval cycles that are typical in this industry. A knowledge
management system can help ensure that critical information gathered during the early years of an investigational
compound’s development flows through the organization and is accessible at the time of regulatory approval and
eventual product launch.
Consulting firms such as McKinsey & Company and Bain & Company have created knowledge databases to capture
experiences and organizational learning from every assignment.
The Accenture Delivery Suite benefits from Accenture’s collective experience and translates that knowledge into a
set of proven methods, tools, metrics, and architectures. The model is global and collaborative. It establishes a
common language and environment that helps Accenture’s professionals to begin contributing immediately and to
continually improve the organization’s practices.
A Willamette University case study on the International Federation of Red Cross and Crescent Societies (IFRC)
notes that member societies derive their value from a deep knowledge of their locales and stakeholders. This
knowledge allows the organizations to respond quickly during disasters. Every engagement is a chance to acquire
and distribute additional information. To capture this information, teams file “after action reports” that focus on
lessons learned and best practices. Details from operations are compiled in a Disaster Management Information
System, which provides access to data in real time to all IFRC members. This knowledge bank helps societies
prepare for foreseeable disasters, such as seasonal flooding or drought, and respond more effectively to unique
crises, such as refugee movements or natural disasters like tsunamis.
Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Management Systems

Organizations that excel at knowledge management focus on several key factors:
Creating an environment and structure that encourage the capture of best practices and facilitate sharing and cross-
fertilization
Recognizing that information must travel within and be retained in the organization
Appreciating the role and importance of personal networks in knowledge and information transfer
Establishing a knowledge-friendly, data-sharing culture (Individuals across cultures and across hierarchical levels
must feel encouraged to share their knowledge and ideas.)
Seeing where knowledge exists and where it is liable to be lost or underutilized
Helping people develop information management and data access skills
Addressing the “What’s in it for me?” question (Those who “borrow” knowledge from the system should also
“deposit” knowledge. In other words, employees should be both givers and takers of knowledge. Seeing the process
as reciprocal and mutually rewarding encourages its use and vitality.)
Developing criteria to define and measure successful KM projects
Identifying and addressing multicultural challenges, such as multiple languages within the organization and different
preferences for screen design
Social Sharing of Knowledge

Most employees recognize that much of what they need to perform better, improve their skills, and gain more knowledge is
around them all the time: learning by observing colleagues, receiving coaching from a supervisor, and having access to
proven ideas and best practices as well as simply getting on-the-job experience every day.
Knowledge transfer is especially important and is an attractive opportunity in a global organization. Knowledge moves
throughout the organization in a social manner as employees transfer into new positions or locations and form new work
relationships. Their experiences may increase the organization’s understanding of local laws and business practices, local
market needs and competitive dynamics, and the strengths and development needs of local workers.
Many organizations use some type of human resource information system to manage assignments and track assignees.
Organizations that have these systems in place may be able to expand or modify them so they can be used to capture and
manage the knowledge gained.
The challenge for employers is to transform the inherently ad hoc nature of this social learning and knowledge transfer into
something with more structure and rigor. Social networking and collaboration technologies can be used to create learning
and knowledge management opportunities.
Social learning doesn’t necessarily require technology-based tools. Coaching and mentoring programs are social learning
opportunities that require planning and time from supervisors but little capital investment. They can also support
employees who don’t fit the typical knowledge worker profile.
By building social learning solutions, an organization can leverage the biggest database of all—the collective experience
of people both within and outside their own organization. Social learning can turn an entire organization into a unified
learning team.
Functional Area #9: Employee and Labor Relations
Employee and Labor Relations refers to any dealings between the organization and its employees regarding
the terms and conditions of employment.
Supports interactions with union and other employee representatives.
Supports the organization’s interests in union-management activities.
Assists and supports the organization in the collective bargaining process.
Participates in or facilitates alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes (e.g., arbitration, mediation).
Makes recommendations for addressing other types of employee representation (e.g., governmental, legal).
Develops and implements workplace policies, handbooks, and codes of conduct.
Provides guidance to employees on the terms and implications of their employment agreement and the
organization’s policies and procedures (e.g., employee handbook).
Consults managers on how to supervise difficult employees, handle disruptive behaviors, and respond with the
appropriate level of corrective action.
Conducts investigations into employee misconduct and suggests disciplinary action when necessary.
Manages employee grievance and discipline processes.
Resolves workplace labor disputes internally.

Manages interactions and negotiations with union and other employee representatives (e.g., governmental, legal).
Serves as the primary representative of the organization’s interests in union-management activities (e.g.,
negotiations, dispute resolution).
Manages the collective bargaining process.
Consults on and develops an effective organized labor strategy (e.g., avoidance, acceptance, adaptation) to achieve
the organization’s desired impact on itself and its workforce.
Educates employees, managers, and leaders at all levels about the organization’s labor strategy (e.g., avoidance,
acceptance, adaptation) and its impact on the achievement of goals and objectives.
Educates employees at all levels about changes in the organization’s policies.
Coaches and counsels managers on how to operate within the parameters of organizational policy, labor
agreements, and employment agreements.
Oversees employee investigations and discipline.
Key Concepts:
Approaches to retaliation prevention.
Approaches to union-organization relations (e.g., collective bargaining, contract negotiation, contract administration
process).
Causes of and methods for preventing and addressing strikes, boycotts, and work stoppages.
Disciplinary procedures and approaches.
Employment rights, standards, and concepts (e.g., labor rights, living wage and fair wage concepts, standard
workday), according to the International Labor Organization (ILO).
Techniques for disciplinary investigations.
Techniques for grievance and complaint resolution.
Types and development of compliance and ethics programs (e.g., design, implementation, performance measures).
Types and structures of organized labor (e.g., unions, works councils, trade union federations, other employee
collectives).
Types of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (e.g. mediation, arbitration) and their advantages and disadvantages.
Unfair labor practices, according to the ILO.
Unionization approaches, methods, and management (e.g., acceptance, avoidance strategies).

Employee and Labor Relations
An organization’s success in benefiting from its extensive investment in its human resources depends on its ability to
manage the employment relationship. This relationship may be individual—between the employer and individual
employees—or it may be collective—between one or more employers, groups of employees, and third parties. These third
parties can include labor organizations (e.g., labor/trade unions, works councils) and government agencies (e.g.,
departments/ministries of labor).
The employment relationship is affected by history, culture, laws, ethical systems, economic conditions, and industry
practices. Within these constraints, HR plays a critical role:
Helping to create and communicate a positive employee relationship, including ensuring productive resolution of
workplace disputes and employee discipline
Developing and implementing the organization’s employee and labor relations strategy
Supporting the organization’s relationship with third parties (e.g., contract negotiation and administration, compliance
with labor laws)
The Employment Relationship

Develops and implements workplace policies, handbooks, and codes of conduct.
Provides guidance to employees on the terms and implications of their employment agreement and the
organization’s policies and procedures (e.g., employee handbook).
Educates employees at all levels about changes in the organization’s policies.

Employment rights, standards, and concepts (e.g., labor rights, living wage and fair wage concepts, standard
workday), according to the International Labor Organization (ILO).
Types and development of compliance and ethics programs (e.g., design, implementation, performance measures).
The Employment Relationship
The characteristics of the employment relationship are influenced by a country’s economic history and conditions, culture
and institutions, industrial practices, and individual employer values. HR’s task is to navigate through those influences and
help shape a relationship with employees that contributes to the organization’s success and complies with ethical
standards, local laws, and cultural norms.
Managing the employment relationship calls on many HR behavioral competencies in addition to the knowledge
competency HR Expertise (especially familiarity with applicable laws). As the following example shows, HR professionals
must apply Leadership and Navigation, Ethical Practice, Communication, and Relationship Management competencies to
many situations involving the employment relationship.
A student employee who worked in the Academic Services area of the Athletics Department reported an incident to an
academic counselor. While she was working in the football area, she passed an assistant coach. The assistant coach
knew her only casually but touched her hair and said, “Hey, that’s for good luck.” The student employee did not respond
but later raised the issue as a problem with one of the academic counselors. The counselor told her she should report it to
human resources.
The male HR director met with the student but had very little knowledge of the incident. He brought in a female HR
professional staff member to add perspective and to witness the interview. After listening to the student employee’s
description of the incident, the HR director asked her what she felt would be the best outcome and specifically asked her if
she wanted to lodge a formal complaint. She responded that she did not wish to make a complaint but she felt that her
person had been violated and that something should be done.
In case the action might constitute harassment, the HR director interviewed the assistant coach. The assistant coach was
surprised and offered to apologize to the student. The HR director and the coach discussed why the student might have
been offended by being touched by someone she didn’t know. The coach agreed that he had assumed his action was
acceptable based on his and the student’s shared race, but he understood now how it could have been perceived and
agreed that it was not appropriate.
The HR director decided that the incident did not rise to the level of sexual harassment and took no formal action against
the coach. The director talked to the student again about what he had learned in his conversation with the coach. He
explained his reasoning for not reprimanding the coach for sexual harassment but did note that the incident and the
interviews had been documented. He forwarded the coach’s offer to apologize in person. The student was upset that HR
had interviewed the coach. The HR director explained the institution’s ethical and possibly legal obligation to investigate
the incident once it had been brought to HR’s attention. This required gathering facts and talking to everyone involved.
The student remained upset, however.
The HR director documented the matter fully in a memo. A few weeks later the student employee’s parents contacted the
university president’s office to complain about the handling of the incident. All documentation was provided to the
president’s office. The matter eventually was dropped, but it remained a difficult situation that the HR director would look
back on often and try to learn from. Sometimes employee disputes cannot be resolved to everyone’s satisfaction, but the
HR director had made an honest effort to protect both sides and the institution in the conflict. Still, could he have
approached the situation differently?
International Labor Standards
Fundamental to the employee relationship of the 21st century are basic employee and employer rights that have been
described in a large body of international standards and agreements.
These ethical principles reflect and, in some cases, have influenced local employment laws and regulations. Rights and
responsibilities related to employment are defined at the constitutional level, in statutes, and in regulations implementing
statutes. Workforce laws and regulations address many facets of the workplace relationship, including individual and
collective rights. Since employment laws may vary significantly in detail as well as philosophy, HR professionals should be
familiar with the employment-related laws in the geographical areas in which their organizations operate. These laws may
regulate such issues as wages and hours, benefits, and conditions (e.g., antidiscrimination, health and safety) that are
described in other Functional Areas in this Learning System.
Even if these standards are not reflected in a nation’s employment laws, they set a recognized bar that ethical employers
strive to reach. International standards are especially significant to global organizations developing or trying to apply
standards across their organizations.
The definition and recognition of basic worker rights has been an issue for more than a century. Efforts have been made
by international institutions to establish recognized expectations of employee rights and employer responsibilities—
international labor standards. These standards reflect a consensus about the rights of the employee and the
responsibilities of the employer. Meeting these standards is a concern for all employers but a special challenge for global
employers or businesses with global supply chains.
International Labour Organization

The standards issued by the International Labour Organization (ILO) capture key issues related to employee rights. They
are accepted as standards by other international groups such as the World Trade Organization and have provided models
for national labor statutes. The ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations headquartered in Geneva. It evolved
from the Commission on International Labor Legislation, which was formed in 1919 as a result of the Treaty of Versailles
following World War I. The ILO membership includes governments (currently 187 member states), employers, and worker
groups. Together, these constituents shape policies and programs related to four strategic objectives:
Promote rights at work.
Encourage decent employment opportunities.
Enhance social protection.
Strengthen dialogue on work-related issues.
Labor standards are developed through a complex process involving research and analysis, reports, comment or
discussion sessions, drafts, revisions, and finally adoption as conventions by at least two-thirds of member nations.
Member nations are obligated to submit a convention to their own law-making bodies to enact related legislation and/or to
ratify the convention. (In some cases, members may not ratify the convention but still enact legislation reflecting the
standard’s objectives.)
The ILO has identified eight core labor standards:

“Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize,” prohibiting interference from public authorities and
the requirement of authorization by employers
“Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining,” protecting workers from retaliation and obligating employers to
negotiate with unions
“Forced Labor,” prohibiting forced and compulsory labor, except for military service, prison, and emergencies (e.g.,
war, natural disaster)
“Abolition of Forced Labor,” prohibiting forced labor as a means of political coercion or punishment, retaliation for
strikes, workforce mobilization, labor discipline, and discrimination
“Minimum Age,” prohibiting the hiring of children too young to have completed compulsory schooling and limiting
employment in hazardous work to those 18 and over
“Worst Forms of Child Labor,” prohibiting any work likely to be harmful to the health, safety, and morals of children
“Equal Remuneration,” requiring equal pay and benefits for men and women
“Discrimination,” prohibiting discrimination in hiring, training, and working conditions and requiring employers to
promote equality of opportunity and treatment
Employer Rights Under the Law

Employer rights have not received as much attention on the international stage as employee rights. There have been
international treaties on intellectual property and copyright/patent protection, but employer rights are more often defined in
local laws and individual and group employment contracts.
In general, employers are allowed to direct the work of employees and conduct their organizations as long as they comply
with relevant laws and contracts (individual or group). They have the right to protect the organization’s assets from
damage (e.g., from theft or loss of reputation), and they have the right to benefit from work performed by employees,
unless contracts define other arrangements.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property (IP) is the ownership of innovation by an individual or business enterprise. In an enterprise, IP is the
product of employee creativity and enterprise resources. It can represent a considerable part of the value of a commercial
enterprise, particularly in technology and communication companies. IP includes patented, trademarked, or copyrighted
property, such as inventions and processes, graphical images and logos, names, indications of geographic origin,
architectural designs, and literary and artistic works.
IP also includes trade secrets and proprietary or confidential information that are not specifically protected under patent,
trademark, and copyright law. This type of IP could include statements of strategy, secret recipes, lists of customers or
prices, employee work product, and financial information.
Protecting their rights can cause employers to become involved in physical and logical security (e.g., restricted access to
or use of data) and surveillance practices (through video cameras, restricted Internet traffic, or searches of social media
sites). Although they have the right to protect their assets and secure work for which they have paid, employers should be
aware that these rights may—depending on applicable law—conflict with employees’ rights to privacy and freedom of
expression. Employer practices have been limited by laws or legal decisions in many countries.
HR plays a direct role in protecting employer rights by making sure that work obligations are communicated through
employee handbooks, policies, and practices and understood by employees and by including appropriate language in
employment agreements, such as nondisclosure requirements.
Employment Contracts
Employer and employee rights and responsibilities are defined and agreements may be documented through employment
contracts. Employers may contract with individual employees and with organized groups of employees. Contracts with
organized labor groups are discussed later in this Functional Area.
Employment contracts are the norm in many countries, although their forms and requirements may vary. Some countries
penalize employers for not providing written contracts within a certain length of time; others accept a paycheck stub as
recognition of employment.
In some cases, depending on applicable law, the absence of a written contract may give rise to an implied contract. It is
often to the employer’s benefit to avoid implied contracts since they may include more generous dismissal compensation.
Employments contracts must be formally amended. An employer seeking to change employment terms for workers after a
purchase or merger may be restricted by acquired rights laws—unless the employer can prove economic hardship. For
example, in the United Kingdom, both national law and the EU Acquired Rights Directive (2001/23/EC) require an
employer to demonstrate “economic, technical, or organizational” reasons for changes in employment or termination; an
employer faces penalties if the reasons given are proven to be false. The strategy of amending contracts by firing and
rehiring under new terms may not be legally defensible and may be considered unfair dismissal.
Key Content
Contracts with international assignees and global employees should specify which country’s laws will apply to the contract
and what jurisdiction will be applied in the event of litigation.
Employment at-Will
In the U.S., unlike other countries, most employees work on an at-will basis. Employment at-will is not a federal law but a
principle derived from common law (judgments rendered by various courts). It has, however, been restricted by statutory
actions at the state level. HR professionals must be familiar with local legal status.
The principle of employment at-will (EAW) means that employers have the right at any time, with or without prior notice,
to hire, fire, demote, or promote whomever they choose for no reason or any reason. Similarly, employees have the right
to quit a job at any time for any reason, with or without prior notice. The concept of employment at-will is usually reinforced
in employee handbooks and is included in other employment documents such as offer and acceptance letters as well as
performance management documents. This includes documents related to disciplinary matters.
One could argue that employment at-will has endured in the U.S. because statutory law and judicial decisions have
stepped in to define certain protections for both sides. These exemptions are recognized on a state level. The most widely
recognized exemptions include the following.
Public policy exemptions. Employees may not be fired without cause if this would violate state or federal laws.
Terminations that can be proven to be in violation of a federal antidiscrimination law (e.g., the Americans with
Disabilities Act) would not be protected under the at-will doctrine. For example, an employee cannot be fired for
talking to other employees about work conditions, forming a union, or whistleblowing (reporting an employer’s illegal
activity to authorities), which are protected activities.
Implied contract exemptions. Implied contracts (i.e., not written) are difficult to prove but can be created through
certain employer actions, promises, or statements made by individuals or the organization as a whole. For example,
promises in an employee handbook that employees will be fired only for good cause can be interpreted as an implied
contract.
Covenant of good faith and fair dealing exemption. This applies in only a few states. It restricts actions that are
seen as unjust or malicious.
In general, in the U.S. employment contracts are offered only to high-value employees, such as high-level and key
personnel (e.g., those involved in creating strategy and products). In these cases, the costs of filling positions might be
very high. Contracts may also be used to attract talent with special provisions or to restrict employees’ ability to use
confidential information.
Post-Employment Agreements
Post-employment agreements, intended to be legally binding and usually signed at hiring, aim at safeguarding the
employer’s right to protect its business by restricting the employee’s behavior during and after employment.
A common form of post-employment agreement, especially in knowledge industries, is the non-disclosure agreement
(NDA) , in which the employee agrees not to discuss knowledge gained during employment. This can include knowledge
related to patented products, business models and strategies, customer information, or privileged information such as test
results or pending litigation. The agreement usually specifies a period of time during which the employee is barred from
disclosure. It generally does not restrict use of information that is considered commonly known.
Some employers require that employees sign a non-compete agreement (NCA) as a condition of employment. A non-
compete agreement prevents an employee from leaving to work for one of the employer’s competitors. The agreement
may specify a period of time and a geographical range within which the employee is barred from working for a competitor.
Post-employment agreements have advantages and disadvantages. When they are carefully written to restrict truly
proprietary information—and when they are legal in the jurisdiction—they can protect the employer against risks of loss.
When an NDA or NCA is vague or overly broad in terms of the information it restricts (e.g., an NDA that prohibits an
employee from discussing the corporate culture or an NCA that prohibits an entry-level employee from seeking similar
employment elsewhere), they can become problematic:
Subsequent employers may counter-sue an employer seeking to enforce an NCA.
Local jurisdictions and governments may look unfavorably on what they perceive as infringing on an employee’s right
to work and freedom of speech. NCAs have been accused of lowering wages (since employees cannot leave for
similar employment) and discouraging entrepreneurship. NCAs may be illegal or severely restricted in some
jurisdictions.
They may damage an employer’s ability to attract and retain talent. Young, highly skilled employees may see an
NDA/NCA requirement as disqualifying a potential employer. Some employees may leave certain markets in search
of jurisdictions that are less accepting of restrictions.
Employers should carefully consider whether these agreements are necessary for all employees…or necessary at all for
their businesses. Boilerplated agreements should probably be avoided in favor of more targeted and negotiated
agreements.
Employee Relationship Strategy

An organization’s employee relations (ER) strategy should include:
Alignment with the organizational strategy, showing how the ER strategy will help the organization achieve its long-
term goals.
Alignment with employment laws and business practices. In some areas and industries, organizations cannot choose
to avoid working with works councils and labor unions. Consulting with these third-party representatives may be
required by law or be a traditional feature of an industry’s or nation’s employee relations.
A vision describing the type of workplace culture the leaders hope to create.
The values upon which the strategy is built—for example, respect, teamwork, mindfulness of strategically defined
issues such as customer focus, quality improvement, or safety. In the same way that organizational business
strategies must be in alignment with the organization’s culture, the ER strategy must fit the organization’s values and
beliefs. If not, the organization must commit to the process of changing its culture to one that is consistent with the
ER strategy.
Goals, for example:

Develop a constructive and compliant relationship with labor organizations in the workplace.
Implement communication plans that enable timely sharing of critical information or facilitate early resolution of ER
issues.
Initiatives (a set of action plans to achieve the organization’s goals), for example:
Implementing an audit program to make management’s actions more transparent and to increase responsibility for
decisions.
Assembling a joint management-employee task force to define vehicles and events to improve communication
between leadership and employees.
The organization must communicate the ER strategy to employees—through, for example, new-hire materials, employee
handbooks, or annual and functional meetings. Managers and supervisors must understand the ER strategy and their role
in implementing it on a daily basis.
Workplace Policies
Key to the employment relationship is the employer’s clear communication of policies, often through an employee
handbook or manual. Employee performance management, discipline, and termination should involve the employee’s
understanding of the employer’s promises (e.g., work terms, complaint procedures) and expectations of employee conduct
(e.g., compliance with antiharassment or substance use policies). In a workplace regulated by union contracts, the
contract supersedes the employee handbook, but handbooks are still often used to clarify expectations.
A policy is a broad statement that reflects an organization’s philosophy, objectives, or standards concerning a particular
set of management or employee activities. Policies reflect the employer’s employee relationship strategy. They are general
in nature and are expressed through more specific procedures and work rules.
Properly conceived and implemented, policies are intended to help management and employees make intelligent
decisions—decisions consistent with those policies. In that respect, policies provide a basis for HR management practices
and a framework within which these practices are established.
While policies may be written down in a physical or online handbook, they may also be unwritten—communicated by word
or action.
Policies, written or unwritten, are not permanent. The organization needs to periodically review policies and revise those
that are obsolete. However, numerous and frequent changes in policies may indicate management problems.
HR’s Role in Policies and Procedures

HR’s role is not necessarily to develop workplace policies or procedures. In some instances, HR:
Supports the development of policies by the organization’s leaders. Some policies, such as discipline and discharge,
are driven by the organization’s culture, and the role of HR may be to help leaders apply the organization’s values to
employment issues and determine policy positions.
Facilitates development of procedures by other departments. Some departments assume the responsibility for many
of their own department-level policies and procedures, while others will request HR support to develop consistent
and thorough policies and procedures.
Supports communication of policies throughout the organization. HR needs to ensure that managers are clear about
the intent and/or specific terms of the policies and how to communicate and enforce them. As warranted, HR should
provide related training for managers.
Developing Policies and Procedures in Global Organizations

Global HRM emphasizes the need for policies that are consistent, fair, and transparent throughout the organization.
However, the realities of a global organization—with its global workforce, globally mobile employees, and different
locations around the world—challenge the notions of consistency and fairness. Fully standardized policies and procedures
are not always possible because of the need for legal compliance and cultural adaptation. If standardization is achieved,
the policies may not be fair for all.
At the same time, lack of consistency and fairness in a global organization can be problematic. If global assignees find
different expectations and treatment in their assignments, the discrepancies can lead to conflicts that harm retention of
valuable employees. In a global electronic environment, stories of personal experiences can spread quickly and
undermine the organization’s image with its employees.
Employee Handbooks
Since employee handbooks are often used during employee onboarding and performance management activities, HR is
often directly involved in creating them.
Policies should be developed with a goal of communicating effectively with employees. They should be available in the
language of the employee and in a form of media universally available. For example, employers should not rely solely on
an electronic document posted to the organization’s website if some employees don’t have electronic access.
Organization of topics should be clear, and wording should be simple and direct. If employees cannot read, other means
must be used to convey the information and confirm understanding.
Employers in a union environment address the issue of handbooks differently. A policy handbook may be used to outline
policies that apply to all employees without exception. They may describe, for example, access to federally mandated
rights (e.g., family leave) and restrictions on illegal behavior (e.g., sexual harassment, violence, illegal drug use). The
collective bargaining agreement or labor contract serves as a description of the terms and conditions of employment for
employees covered by the agreement. A separate handbook may be created if the workplace includes nonunion
employees. It sets out terms and conditions of employment but makes clear that it applies only to employees not covered
under a collective bargaining agreement.
Exhibit 32 summarizes key points in developing effective employee handbooks.
Exhibit 32: Tips for Creating Effective Employee Handbooks
Tips for Creating Effective Employee Handbooks
Make sure the handbook reflects Focus on policy and policy-related

your organization. Look at procedures. Avoid job-related
templates and, if available, procedures or rules.
handbooks for other organizations Include procedures for reporting
as a guide, but aim for a complete and/or resolving policy and work rule
and accurate reflection of your violations.
organization’s policies. Be realistic in expectations. Policy
Align your handbook with local laws should be consistently enforced, and
and regulations. For example, a consistent enforcement is difficult
statement that the handbook does when policies are overly restrictive
not create a contract is necessary and/or culturally misaligned.
in the U.S. to maintain an at-will Keep it short, comprehensible to the
employment relationship. average reader, and unambiguous.
Involving Managers and Supervisors
Managers and supervisors must understand the organizational ER strategy and how that strategy is aligned with specific
management practices—for example, how creating trust requires that managers and supervisors behave in an open, fair,
and consistent manner. In a workplace with organized labor groups, managers and supervisors should be able to explain
the organization’s labor strategy and posture. They should understand contract terms and procedures completely.
Selection and promotion criteria for supervisory and managerial positions should include competent communication skills,
emotional intelligence, and ethical behavior (e.g., avoiding discriminatory and harassing behaviors).
Managers and supervisors should receive training on the organization’s policies and procedures, especially regarding the
handling of conflict and discipline and development opportunities—perhaps by being mentored by experienced managers
and supervisors. Most importantly, their performance evaluations should include metrics that demonstrate an ability to
fulfill the ER strategy in daily work with employees.
Labor Relations

Assists and supports the organization in the collective bargaining process.
Consults on and develops an effective organized labor strategy (e.g., avoidance, acceptance, adaptation) to achieve
the organization’s desired impact on itself and its workforce.
Educates employees, managers, and leaders at all levels about the organization’s labor strategy (e.g., avoidance,
acceptance, adaptation) and its impact on the achievement of goals and objectives.
Manages the collective bargaining process.

Types and structures of organized labor (e.g., unions, works councils, trade union federations, other employee
collectives).
Unionization approaches, methods, and management (e.g., acceptance, avoidance strategies).
Approaches to union-organization relations (e.g., collective bargaining, contract negotiation, contract administration
process).
Labor Relations
Labor relations refers to the way organizations manage their relationships with employees as a collective group rather
than individually. Frequently this relationship involves third parties—employee representatives (e.g., labor/trade unions,
works councils, and professional associations) and institutions that interject themselves into the employer-employee
relationship (e.g., government ministries that monitor compliance with labor laws or international organizations that define
labor standards). HR professionals must be familiar with these third parties, with their organization’s chosen labor strategy,
and with the role of HR in developing and implementing labor contracts.
The chief human resources officer (CHRO) at an automaker just participated with the senior management team in
developing the strategic plan. One key element includes contract negotiations with all unions in the company’s different
locations. Some recent negotiations have been unduly long and disruptive.
In order to better prepare for these talks, the CHRO applied the Business Acumen, Relationship Management, and Critical
Evaluation competencies. The CHRO:
Met with key executives to understand their priorities and goals.
Conducted an HR SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis to review lessons learned from
recent negotiations and possible hot buttons in the near future.
Established a contract negotiation mission and vision for the negotiating teams.
Conducted an HR analysis to identify any gaps in information or details related to the union contracts.
Determined if there are any critical people issues (e.g., wages, hours, benefits) that can be anticipated.
Developed goals and solutions in anticipation of the unions’ requests.
By proceeding through the HR strategic process highlighted above, the CHRO will be well prepared to carry forward the
organization’s position and efficiently and effectively improve both the negotiation process and its results.
Labor or Trade Unions
Key Content
A labor union or trade union is a group of workers who coordinate their activities to achieve common goals (e.g., better
wages, hours, or working conditions; job security; training) in their relationship with an employer or group of employers.
Members elect representatives to interact with management. In some countries, trade unions may include managers and
professionals as well as skilled and unskilled workers.
Unions may be a well-established feature of an organization’s workplace and industry, and the task of HR is primarily to
support the organization’s union relations strategy and administer contracts.
In other workplaces, unions may be seeking the right to represent employees, either for the first time in the workplace or in
place of another union. In these cases, HR professionals should become familiar with the local process of unionization,
which can vary significantly in different countries. The process may include certification of the union by a government
ministry, definition of work units and employees covered, and/or elections. Elections may be preceded by extensive
campaigns with the involvement of third parties, such as national labor and employer groups and social/religious groups.
HR professionals should be familiar with the requirements unions must fulfill before they are allowed to represent
employees in bargaining. They should also ensure that managers and supervisors are aware of any regulations limiting
management’s speech and behavior during this period. Again, regulations will vary by country, but essentially they reflect
international labor standards in prohibiting employers from interfering with employees’ rights to organize, from intimidating
or bribing employees to deter them from joining/forming a union, and from retaliating against employees for their
involvement in organizing.
At the same time, managers and supervisors should be aware of employers’ rights during organizing campaigns. HR can
assist in one of management’s primary rights: the right to communicate to employees its reasons for preferring to remain
union-free.
Types of Unions
Unions vary in structure. They may represent:
Single enterprises, a model seen in Japan. For example, all the employees of an employer, regardless of job type or
skills, may be represented by a single enterprise union. These enterprise-level unions may join a larger national or
industrial confederation.
Specific trades or crafts, such as a union representing electrical, chemical, or atomic workers.
A national union. In many countries different trade or craft unions join national federations of unions. The
confederation may be tight or loose.
An industry union that represents workers from different employers within a certain industry, such as steel or auto
manufacturing.
Large or global employers may interact with all types of unions. Their workforces may be represented by multiple trade
unions; they may bargain with national or industry unions.
At the level of a work unit, employees choose representatives by election. These individuals may be called union
representatives or union/shop stewards. In a very large employer there may be multiple work units, distinguished by type
of work or location. There are additional regional, national, and international levels in the union hierarchy. Members pay
fees that support different union activities, such as organizing, research, bargaining, political action, retired member
services (e.g., health care, pension management), and a variety of services designed to attract members.
Understanding Individual Labor/Trade Unions
Organized labor environments and individual unions can vary significantly. Briscoe, Schuler, and Claus (in the 2008 edition
of International Human Resource Management) identify six characteristics that HR professionals should try to identify in
labor groups with whom their organizations interact:
Level at which bargaining occurs. Is the employer bargaining individually or as part of an industry association? Is
the union representing an enterprise or an entire industry?
Focus of bargaining topics. What is considered a fair topic for labor negotiations? In some countries bargaining
will be restricted to wages and benefits, while bargaining in other countries will focus on broader social issues. Some
unions in developing economies have focused on social topics, such as antidiscrimination, environmental actions,
and HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention.
Union penetration or density. These terms refer to the percentage of workers that belong to a union. The rates
differ widely among countries, especially in countries where union members retain membership after retiring. One
must be careful here when considering union density. There is not always a direct relationship between the number
of members a union has and its ability to shape agreements, since employees who are not members of a union may
still be covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
Membership. Is membership in a union compulsory? Do employees join a union as individual members, as in a

trade union for skilled workers? Or is membership aligned with employment by a specific organization? (In other
words, if you work for organization A, do you have to join union Y?) Are managers allowed to be members? In terms
of membership, unions can represent low-skilled workers and highly skilled professionals. This can affect negotiating
topics and style.
Relationship with management. Is the relationship historically stormy or more cooperative?
Role government will play. How likely is the government to become involved in the labor relationship? What may
trigger its intervention? What concerns will it bring to the table?
In addition to understanding the individual labor relationship, HR professionals should also understand and monitor the
external forces that can influence that relationship—such as economic performance and trends, politics, laws, and
technology.
Labor Relations Strategies

The labor relations strategy addresses the organization’s approach to third-party workforce representation.
There are three generic labor strategies: acceptance, avoidance, and adaptation.
“Acceptance” Labor Strategy

Organizations may accept unionization for good reasons. In some countries, third parties—both labor unions and works
councils—may be well established historically and culturally and well protected legally. Unions may be the norm in certain
industries. Some organizations may find the costs of fighting unionization efforts to be too high or too distracting.
“Avoidance” Labor Strategy

Employers may choose to avoid unionization because of the additional cost of managing a unionized workforce (especially
one with multiple unions), the loss of flexibility in management decisions, and the increased time required to make and
implement strategic decisions. In some industries or markets, a unionized workforce may be seen as a competitive
disadvantage. An organization seeking to avoid unionization can decrease the appeal of unions and/or remain vigilant and
active in resisting unionization efforts.
The appeal of unions can be blunted by addressing the major reasons why employees consider joining unions—by
offering competitive wages and benefits, cultivating trust and mutual respect, making sure employees are treated fairly and
with transparency, maintaining a safe working environment, and fostering two-way communication with employees. It is
important to communicate why the organization prefers to remain union-free.
Organizations can also train managers and supervisors to be vigilant for signs of unionizing activity and to respond quickly
to actions, representing the employer’s interests within the existing labor statutes.
“Adaptation” Labor Strategy

When a workplace is already unionized, the employer can define the type of relationship they want with third-party
representatives: confrontational or collaborative. A confrontational relationship—involving difficult contract bargaining,
contention over administration of agreements, and, if legally possible, seeking to oust or replace the union—offers an
employer the possibility of greater control over labor decisions. It also means, however, investment of time and resources
in implementing the strategy and increased risk of operational disruptions.
With a collaborative union relationship, some organizations have found that unions and works councils help organize their
relationship with employees, especially with large and complex bodies of employees. By collaborating with and involving
unions, employers may also lower employees’ resistance to necessary changes and implement change initiatives more
easily. A union structure may also provide an acceptable way to resolve grievances and conflicts.
A more collaborative labor-management relationship is generally characterized by:

A greater acceptance of labor-management partnerships.
An increased willingness to share power.
More open and candid sharing of information.
Joint decision making on issues of common concern.
“Win-win” bargaining techniques.
Shared responsibility and accountability for results.
HR can help create and promote an organizational perspective that values positive and productive relations between
management and union representatives. This may mean winning management support for this approach and educating
management about the costs and benefits of a cooperative relationship. HR can develop policies that reflect this
perspective, work with local HR to implement these policies, and manage conflicts with local laws and cultural practices.
Employers have a right to conduct their businesses and protect their assets within the restrictions of labor laws. However,
exercising these rights does not have to necessitate a hostile relationship with unions in the workplace. Exhibit 33
presents several possible strategies for improving the employer-union relationship.
Exhibit 33: Strategies for Improving Employer-Union Relations
Strategies for Improving Employer-Union Relations
Comply with applicable international Implement joint study groups to

standards and local laws governing solve common problems.
unionization and other worker rights. Treat union members equitably and
Comply with local regulations respectfully.
regarding informing and involving Demonstrate genuine appreciation
workers. for employees’ interest and
Develop fair grievance and involvement in workplace issues.
alternative dispute resolution Consult with union leaders to defuse
procedures with built-in appeals problems before they become
mechanisms. These should be grievances.
regionally appropriate and available
to all employees, regardless of union
membership.
Global Labor Relations Strategies

The labor relations strategy in a multinational enterprise is more complex, since labor laws, local cultures, and the
characteristics of workforces may vary in different areas of operation. Organizations must choose whether to adopt a
unified, headquarters-defined strategy or to allow local operations to develop and pursue individual labor strategies. Some
organizations establish benchmarks in one location that are then used for negotiating agreements in other locations.
The organization’s strategy is also shaped by key differences in its operations and culture, including the following:
The extent to which the enterprise’s production is integrated among its subsidiaries. Some global enterprises
are structured to be interdependent. For example, a Japanese electronics manufacturer relies on components
(circuit boards, power supplies, LED displays) that are manufactured by subsidiaries in other countries.
Subassembly and final assembly are done by separate subsidiaries located regionally. It is to the enterprise’s benefit
to consider the interrelationship of workforce relations at each subsidiary, because a breakdown in one area can
disrupt the entire production chain. Management may assume a more centralized strategy.
An enterprise’s cultural attitude toward workforce relations and experience with labor/trade unions. Some
studies have suggested that national origin can affect the global enterprise’s default position on working with unions
and works councils. These positions may be on a spectrum of “adversarial” at one end, “jointness” at the other end,
and “arm’s length” in the middle. The labor relations strategy of a global enterprise originating in the United States,
where an adversarial or arm’s-length union relationship often prevails, will probably vary greatly from one originating
in a European country, in which management and HR have more experience with the participative model of works
councils and codetermination. The U.S. multinational Walmart maintains a nonunion stance as a corporate policy.
However, it has had to adapt to new markets where unions are the norm, such as China.
The relationship between the originating company and its subsidiaries. A locally responsive global enterprise
may allow each subsidiary to develop its own strategy, while a standardized global enterprise may develop a more
uniform industrial relations strategy. For example, imagine an Indian holding company that has a Thailand subsidiary
specializing in resort property management and a Singaporean subsidiary specializing in high-tech, sophisticated
agricultural commodities brokering. The first subsidiary deals primarily with service industry unions, while the second
works with a variety of unions representing more-skilled workers. The two organizations have different sector profit
levels and different labor pool conditions. The global enterprise may opt, for good reasons, to allow each subsidiary
to craft its own labor strategy. In addition, the maturity and significance of the subsidiary can affect the relationship.
An organization is more likely to be involved in workforce relations with a newly acquired or poorly performing
subsidiary. It is more likely to impose its home-country approach to workforce relations on subsidiaries if the
subsidiaries represent a small part of its revenue.
In the fourth edition of International Human Resource Management, Dennis Briscoe, Randall Schuler, and Ibraiz Tarique
describe seven different approaches to managing the workforce relationship that global enterprises may develop based on
these differences. Like the enterprise’s global strategy, the options lie on a continuum between two points: locally
responsive (in this case, hands-off) and centralized or standardized (in this case, managing local conditions with
headquarters-derived policy). Most global organizations will craft a global HR strategy for workforce relationships that falls
somewhere between these two positions.
The seven options are:

Hands-off. In this locally responsive strategy, the workforce relationship is entirely locally managed.
Monitor. Headquarters tracks local management decisions and demonstrates its interest and concerns, but it leaves
decisions to be made locally.
Guide and advise. Headquarters offers more advice and tries to apply global policies to local practices, but it still
leaves decisions at the local level.
Strategic planning. The employee relations strategy is developed with an understanding of variation among
workforces throughout the enterprise. Policies are set globally, but practices are developed locally. Practices must
conform to the global policies.
Set limits and approve exceptions. Some local adaptations may be made but only after review and approval by
headquarters HR.
Integration of headquarters and line management in field. Labor decisions are made jointly.
Manage locally from headquarters. In the centralized or standardized alternative, local HR staff simply implement,
without change, headquarters-developed HR policies and practices.
These strategies require different levels of headquarters familiarity with local labor conditions and practices. HR
practitioners who have global responsibilities should rely on the expertise of labor relations specialists in the countries in
which they operate.
Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining is the process by which management and union representatives negotiate the employment
conditions for a particular bargaining unit. Bargaining may follow the recognition of a union’s right to represent a work unit,
or it may be triggered by the expiration of an existing contract. Bargaining covers items such as wages, benefits, and
working conditions and may include other matters deemed important by the members. As has been mentioned previously,
bargaining may occur between individual employers and unions or multi-employer groups and trade union associations.
The process may be centralized at the national level, with government participation.
The combined factors influencing collective bargaining may be generally categorized as:
Legal and regulatory factors—government regulations that make collective bargaining agreements compulsory for
employers or enforceable.
Bargaining precedents—factors during the bargaining process that led to previous agreements and/or the existing
agreement.
Public and employee opinion—public sentiments about the organization and the union and what employees deem to
be pertinent.
Economic conditions—the state of the local and national economies.
Exhibit 34 visualizes how these various factors impact the collective bargaining process. Collective bargaining subjects
refer to topics that will be addressed in the contract. National labor laws specify which topics are mandatory, discretionary,
or specifically prohibited.
Exhibit 34:
Factors
Affecting
the
Collective
Bargaining
Process
Contract Negotiation Process

The negotiating process is designed to balance the rights and interests of employees, the union, and management
through a two-way flow of communication. The negotiating team for collective bargaining is usually composed of a small
group of management and union officials.
The general process followed is that the union submits a contract proposal to the employer. The employer then has a
certain amount of time to respond to the proposal and to negotiate its terms. In Chile if an employer does not respond to
the proposal within a certain time frame, the proposed contract is automatically enacted. In the U.S. the failure of either
side to negotiate in good faith (i.e., actively work toward agreement) is considered an unfair labor practice.
The goal of contract negotiations is to arrive at a workable contract that is mutually acceptable to both the union and the
organization. Both parties have a responsibility to establish a contract that will contribute to an ongoing constructive
relationship that fosters effective resolution of issues. The first contract is generally the most difficult to negotiate, as the
parties work together to develop the collective bargaining agreement. In subsequent years, they revise and build upon the
contract, attempting to clarify ambiguous issues and address new issues of interest to the parties.
If the sides cannot agree, outside mediation and arbitration may be used. In some countries these dispute mechanisms
are mandatory. Mediators and arbitrators may be neutral parties or, in some countries, government panels or labor
tribunes.
Mediation (also known as conciliation) is a method of nonbinding dispute resolution involving a third party who tries to
help the disputing parties reach a mutually agreeable decision. It is aimed at keeping labor and management negotiators
talking so they can voluntarily reach a settlement. Mediators have no power to compel the two parties to reach an
agreement. Instead, they seek to find common ground and persuade the parties that it is in their best interest to reach an
agreement without resorting to a strike.
Arbitration is a negotiated procedure in which labor and management agree to submit disputes to an impartial third party
and abide by the arbitrator’s decision. The arbitration process is more informal than court proceedings. As a result, it can
usually concentrate on key issues and resolve disputes faster than litigation. It is designed to permit uninterrupted
operations during the existence of a contract and to substitute for the historical remedy—a union strike or an employer
lockout.
If negotiations are successful, the result is a contract or collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The CBA governs the day-
to-day relationship of the employer and the employees in the bargaining unit for the period of time it specifies. Contract
provisions are enforceable through internal grievance and arbitration procedures, labor tribunals, or, in some countries, the
courts.
HR’s Role in Collective Bargaining

HR professionals play a valuable role in improving the quality of the contract. Based on their experience and knowledge of
relevant metrics, they can:
Suggest work processes that are most cost-effective and identify management proposals that may be ineffective in
terms of creating a productive workplace (e.g., job restructuring that increases stress).
Contribute suggestions based on HR’s understanding of employee needs. In some cases, nonmonetary concessions
can be as significant to employee groups as wages and benefits.
Analyze contract language to identify potential misunderstandings or difficulties in administration that could result in
grievances later.
Provide negotiators with data about employee demographics and payroll and benefits costs that can be used to
analyze the cost implications of proposals and concessions.
Identify unintended consequences of contract provisions so that they can be more fully considered. For example, an
employer’s offer might not be economically sustainable over the life of the contract, or it might be too low,
encouraging other employers who are not locked into multiyear contracts to lure employees away with higher wages
once the contract has been approved.
Identify clauses from preceding contracts that may be in conflict with new employment laws.
Union Contract Administration and Enforcement

HR is directly involved in contract administration and enforcement, as the abstractions of the legal document are applied to
the complicated situations that can arise in the workplace. HR does what it can to make sure that the contract provisions
are met. This may include educating managers and supervisors about new contract provisions, specific ways in which
their actions should reinforce the contract, and how to proceed if questions or problems arise. Effective education may
prevent many grievances from occurring.
It is also important for HR professionals to develop good working relationships with union representatives, to the same
extent that they would develop relationships with managers. Good relationships make communication and conflict
resolution easier.
Handling Grievances
A contract almost always includes a formal grievance procedure . This process provides an orderly way to resolve the
inevitable differences of opinion in regard to the union contract that develop during the life of the agreement.
Keep in mind that many union grievances arise when contracts have not addressed issues specifically or when one or
both sides have misunderstood or miscommunicated policies. To avoid grievances of this sort, both management and
union representatives should evaluate the workplace for potential problems and address these issues before they become
problems, know the labor agreement in its entirety, including past practices and local memoranda of understanding, and
know the employees and their problems.
Some grievances address possible violations of the terms of the contract, but many result from perceived unfair treatment
of an employee by management with regard to disciplinary actions, privileges associated with seniority, or unfair and
discriminatory treatment (e.g., bullying by a supervisor).
The Grievance Process

The employee grievance process involves several steps. Although the process may vary somewhat from contract to
contract and from country to country, the following represents the general steps.
Immediate supervisor. Employees who feel mistreated or think that their contract rights have been violated file a
grievance with the immediate supervisor. At this point, the filing of the grievance may be written or oral; most
grievances are written. The supervisor must attempt to accurately determine the reason for the grievance and try to
solve the problem. Supervisors and union representatives or stewards can work together to solve the problem. If the
union representative agrees that no valid grievance has occurred, the process ends.
Next level. If the employee, supervisor, and union representative cannot solve the problem together, the formal
written grievance proceeds to the next level in the hierarchy—the intermediate supervisor, department head, or unit
manager and a higher-level union official. To promote free discussion, the employee with the grievance is usually not
present and is represented by the union. It is, therefore, important for both sides to fully document their facts and
their positions.
Higher-level management. If the grievance is not resolved within the time period set under the union contract, it
usually goes to the next level, where, on the union side, a member of the grievance committee or a representative
from the union structure is involved. In some organizations, the complaint can go only as high as the local manager;
in others, it can go all the way to top organizational officials. If the grievance is not resolved within the time period set
under the union contract, it usually moves to the final stage.
Third-party determination. If the grievance is still not settled, a neutral outside arbitrator may be called in to settle
the issue. At this stage, the highest levels of each side are usually represented. For the employer, this may include
the vice president for HR (or equivalent) and/or legal counsel. For the union, this may include the local union
president, a national union representative, or legal counsel.
Exhibit 35 provides some helpful guidelines for employers in handling grievances.
Exhibit 35: Guidelines on Handling Grievances
Handling Grievances Do’s Handling Grievances Don’ts
Do investigate and handle each case Don’t make arrangements with

as though it may eventually result in individual employees that are
an arbitration hearing. inconsistent with the labor
Do require the union to identify agreement or that exclude the
specific contract provisions allegedly participation of a union
violated. representative.
Do comply with the contractual time Don’t hold back the remedy if the
limits for handling the grievance. employer is wrong.
Do visit the work area related to the Don’t admit to the binding effect of a
grievance. past practice.
Do determine whether there were Don’t relinquish to the union your
any witnesses. rights as a manager.
Do examine the employee’s Don’t settle grievances on the basis
personnel record. of what is “fair.” (Use the labor
Do fully examine prior grievance agreement as your only standard.)
records. Don’t bargain over items not
Do comply with regulations regarding covered by the contract.
the presence and involvement of Don’t give long, written grievance
union representatives in meetings answers.
with employees. Don’t trade a grievance settlement
Do treat the union representative as for a grievance withdrawal (or try to
your equal. make up for a bad decision in one
Do hold your grievance discussions grievance by bending over backward
privately. in another).
Do fully inform your own supervisor Don’t deny grievances on the
of grievance matters. premise that your “hands have been
Do have at least two management tied by management.”
representatives present. Don’t agree to informal amendments
Do document all grievance meetings; in the contract.
take copious notes. Don’t establish a pattern of practices
that have the effect of creating a
right not specifically included in the
contract.
Works Councils
Key Content
Works councils are permanent bodies composed of workforce members that represent employees, generally on a local or
organizational level. Their primary purpose is information and consultation—to receive from employers and to convey to
employees information that might affect the workforce and the health of the enterprise. Works councils are not involved in
contract negotiation, which is conducted by unions. The closeness of the relationship between a works council and a
related union can vary by country. Unions may support the election of certain members to councils.
Works councils evolved primarily in Germany during the 20th century. The councils were intended to cooperate with
management to increase efficiency, promote harmony in the workplace, provide a means of addressing grievances,
supervise compensation, promote safety and health, and help administer welfare programs. They have become a
common feature of the European workplace, institutionalized by local regulations that require employers of certain sizes to
establish councils. Other countries have works councils as well, including Argentina, Bangladesh, Japan, Thailand, and
South Africa.
Key Content
There are no works councils in the U.S. because they are seen as violations of Section 8(a)(2) of the National Labor
Relations Act, which prohibits company-dominated unions. When carefully managed, employee participation programs can
be used to increase involvement of employees in the organization’s operations—for example, handling grievances or
recommending safety policies.
The level of involvement in the organization’s affairs and cooperation with management by the works councils varies by
organization and country. In some cases, works councils may actually participate in employment-related decisions. On a
national level (for example, Germany), works councils may form constituencies to elect representatives to national
legislatures. Works councils also may be associated with an entire industry or occupational group.
Works councils might be seen as complementary to unions, barred from negotiating but empowered to apply contracts at
a workplace level and to contribute to a workplace’s cultural and social life. Members of a works council are not
necessarily union members, and the relationship between a works council and a union operating in the same workplace
may vary. In one instance a works council may be an extension of a union presence, while in another workplace the works
council may operate independently of the union. Often, however, information gathered through the works council is used
during union-employer negotiations. Many unions see works councils as competitors, a force contributing to the
weakening of labor unions.
Works Councils Structures
Key Content
Works councils are distinguished by their composition, which can include:
Both management and worker representatives.
Only worker representatives who are overseen by a member of management.
Only worker representatives with no management oversight.
The number of works council members generally varies with the number of local employees. These positions are filled
through an election process, and worker representatives typically are afforded significant employment protections.
Employers generally must advise works councils of proposed management decisions, actively seek their input, and
carefully consider their views before taking any action. Those in Germany and the Netherlands are required not only to
consult with works councils in this way but also to obtain their agreement before implementation. In some countries, such
as Germany, works councils also must be kept apprised of the general conditions, financial status, and future plans of the
enterprise.
Codetermination and the Works Council

In some countries, the role of the works council extends beyond information and consultation. Employees may actually
participate in business decision making.
Key Content
Codetermination is a form of corporate governance that requires a two-tiered corporate board structure—a typical
management board and a supervisory board—that allows management and employees to participate in strategic decision
making. Codetermination rights can be extensive and provide a means for employees to influence managerial decisions.
Codetermination topics include anything that affects workers, such as changes in structure, working conditions, employee
relations, working hours, occupational safety and health, HR policies and practices, and compensation.
There are three models of codetermination:
Dual system. In addition to the typical management board, there is a supervisory board. Depending on the size of
the employer, as many as half of the supervisory board members may be workers. Because this supervisory board
has the authority to accept or reject the management board’s decisions, organizations are essentially prohibited from
implementing workplace changes without employee consent.
Single-tier system. There is only one board of directors, but employee representatives are included as members.
Mixed system. Employee representatives are included, but they are only advisors (i.e., in a nonvoting capacity).
HR's Relationship with Works Councils

Because requirements and practices vary from one location to another, HR professionals must consider the employer’s
responsibilities with respect to works councils in each country in which the organization operates.
It is important to understand:
Whether a works council is mandated by statute and, if so, under what circumstances.
The procedures for forming a works council.
The scope of the employer’s obligations with respect to works councils (e.g., the types of issues about which a works
council must be consulted, whether agreement is required, and the timing of such consultation in relation to planned
implementation).
As with unions, works councils offer an avenue for addressing difficult organizational challenges and finding solutions that
avoid workforce disruptions. Organizations should also consider the potential for engaging with works councils proactively
when issues and business decisions address the future welfare of both the employer and the employees, such as the
need for expansion, downsizing, transfer, or outsourcing. Works councils can be ways to develop options, to gather
reactions from employee representatives to plans, and to use their input to adjust solutions and evaluate outcomes. HR
professionals can work toward establishing collaborative and trusting relationships with works councils that may be
needed in the future.
Governments and Other Third-Party Labor Groups

Complicating the employment relationship further is the potential presence of groups beyond the employer and the
employees’ elected representatives. For example, there may be:
Employer or industry associations. In some countries, contracts may be negotiated at a multi-employer level. The
contracts may be at an industry level (e.g., steel manufacturers) or at a national level. For example, in the trucking
and hospitality industries in the U.S., employers and unions may engage in industry-wide or regional negotiations on
a single contract. In the construction industry, a general contractor may negotiate a project labor agreement (PLA)
with multiple trade groups. A PLA requires specific contractors to accept certain conditions in project contracts, such
as paying a fair wage and contributing to health insurance, pension, and training funds.
National governments and agencies. To a certain extent, national governments are always a part of the labor
relationship in that they legislate and regulate aspects of the employee relationship and the employers’ relationship
with unions and works councils. Tripartism—a collaboration of governments, employers, and unions—is the norm in
many countries. During wars, governments have stepped in to prevent disruption of critical production (e.g., to
prevent coal mining strikes in the U.S. during World War II). During economic crises, governments may intervene to
protect employees’ social welfare, taking steps to increase hiring, encourage employers to provide some levels of
employment during retrenchments, or invest in skills development.
International groups. In response to the global recession starting in 2008 to 2009, the ILO—with governments,
employers, and employee groups—created a Global Jobs Pact, which issued recommendations for steps that all
parties could take to meet the economic crisis. Governments could invest in jobs and provide social protections,
while employers could recommit to ILO labor standards and apply flexible work arrangements, such as rotating
workers into jobs.
Local governments, nongovernmental organizations, religious institutions, and community groups. These
groups are usually more active at a local level, applying pressure on social justice issues and helping to support
social programs during economic crises. In the Philippines, the national government includes such groups as social
partners in its efforts to address employment levels. These organizations may also provide representatives to
national-level task forces and arbitration groups on employee relations issues.
Organized Labor Actions and Unfair Labor Practices


Causes of and methods for preventing and addressing strikes, boycotts, and work stoppages.
Unfair labor practices, according to the ILO.
Organized Labor Actions and Unfair Labor Practices
The labor relationship is subject to adverse events. Unions may undertake actions to influence contracts or protest
conditions. Both employers and unions must comply with labor laws that prohibit certain actions that are called unfair labor
practices.
The Leadership and Navigation competency means that an HR professional must be ready to steer the HR function
toward the strategic goals that senior management has set. But the “leadership” part of this competency obligates HR
professionals to speak up to make sure that the organization has chosen the best strategic goals and has avoided the
risks that come with management-union conflict. Consider this example.
A satellite communications firm is approaching renegotiation of the labor contract with workers who perform highly
technical assembly and testing work.
Senior management is primarily composed of engineers who have risen through the managerial ranks. They tend to see
the union workers as less-skilled and less-critical participants in producing the firm’s value. Management appears willing to
implement a harsh labor strategy that the CHRO knows may lead to work stoppages.
The CHRO is attending a strategy session and listens carefully to the positions of those in the room. Asked what HR will
do to implement the strategy, the CHRO says that HR will, of course, do what it can to support whatever strategy is
decided. However, the CHRO points out that management’s perception of the value of the union workers is not accurate.
Although they are not engineers, it would not be easy to replace them. The union will not be as ready to concede as
management assumes. The CHRO recommends developing and analyzing potential contracts in preparation for contract
negotiations and adopting a more win-win approach.
The CHRO has demonstrated the Leadership and Navigation competency by showing the courage to challenge
management when intended actions may harm the organization.
Organized Labor Actions
The term industrial actions , from British usage, includes various forms of collective employee actions (or “concerted
activities,” in U.S. parlance) taken to protest work conditions or employer actions. The term also includes employer actions
taken in response to employee actions.
Collective employee actions intend to interfere with an employer’s ability to fulfill its commercial interests. Actions can be
undertaken by unions (or labor groups in the absence of a recognized union) for a number of reasons:
To call for increased wages and benefits. Tough economic conditions that increase employee indebtedness,
unrealistic expectations, or anger over discrepancies between compensation for high-level managers and employees
can intensify union demands in this area.
To call attention to violations of contract terms, unfair treatment, unfair labor practices, or poor working conditions.
To protest proposed changes in work rules, such as how promotions or grievances are handled or work schedules
are made.
To protest the way in which workers are identified for retention or termination during a downsizing.
To pressure an employer to negotiate a contract.
To resist a proposed contract perceived as unfair (perhaps because it contains “clawback” provisions that will result
in economic loss to employees).
To compete with other unions for the right to represent workers.
Various forms of employee collective industrial actions are listed in Exhibit 36.
Exhibit 36: Examples of Employee Collective Industrial Actions
Action Description
General strike Work stoppage.

Sit-down strike Refusal by workers to work; also refusal by workers to
leave their workstations, making it impossible for the
employer to use replacement workers.
Sympathy strike Action taken in support of another union that is striking

the employer. Contracts may include provisions
prohibiting sympathy strikes.
Wildcat strike Work stoppages at union contract operations that have

not been sanctioned by the union.
Secondary action or Attempt by a union to influence an employer by putting
boycott pressure on another employer—for example, a supplier.
Work-to-rule Situation in which workers slow processes by

performing tasks exactly to specifications or according
to job or task descriptions.
Overtime ban Similar to work-to-rule. Employees refuse to work any

overtime, adhering to the hours stipulated in the
contract.
Picketing Positioning of employees at the place of work targeted

for the action for the purpose of protest. Picketing can
be used for similar purposes as strikes, but there is no
work stoppage. In some cases, picketers may illegally
interfere with commerce at the employer’s site.
The primary form of industrial action taken by employers is the lockout, during which the employer shuts down operations
to prevent employees from working.
The legality of these actions can vary globally, and the conditions under which an action may be taken may be precisely
regulated. In some countries strikes may not be allowed as long as a contract is in force. Certain types of actions may not
be allowed at all. Employers may or may not be able to hire replacement workers.
HR’s Role in Preventing or Mitigating the Effects of Work Actions

Ideally, HR can help avert work actions through its counsel to management, communicating the perspective of employees
and the importance of compliance with contracts, and improving the quality of supervision. Because the tenor of the
management-employee relationship contributes to industrial actions, HR trains managers and supervisors to avoid bullying
and retaliation, to communicate, and to engage in constructive conflict resolution.
However, organizations must be prepared for industrial actions. HR works with management and other functions to
prepare strategies to mitigate the effects of a strike. Preparations can involve:
Training managers to identify and report signs of union strike campaigns and employee/union unfair labor practices.
Organizing and training managers to take the place of workers.
Identifying and arranging for contingent workers if using replacement workers is legal.
Educating managers and supervisors about what they can and cannot do, thus helping avoid unfair labor practices.
When a strike occurs, HR must implement contingency plans, deliver training, and arrange payment to replacement
workers. If and when employees return to work, HR monitors the atmosphere in the workplace and intervenes to help
resolve lingering conflicts associated with the strike.
Unfair Labor Practices

An unfair labor practice (ULP) is a violation of employee rights as defined in a country’s labor statutes. In general, these
rights relate to the core principles of the ILO on the right to organize and bargain collectively. Specifically, however, local
labor laws can define procedures for recognizing a union, conducting a union election, and the behavior of both
management and labor during organizing campaigns and work actions.
ULPs can be committed by employers and unions, and they can occur without the presence of a union. For example,
interfering with an employee’s speech about organizing is an employer ULP that occurs without the presence of a union.
Charges of unfair labor practices are commonly heard by labor boards, commissions, or tribunals. Employers can be fined
or ordered to negotiate, to refrain from the practices in question, or to make public admission of wrongful actions. Unions
may be ordered to desist from committing the action.
Exhibit 37 provides examples of commonly recognized types of ULPs by employers and employees/unions.
Exhibit 37: Employer and Employee/Union ULPs
Employer ULPs Employee/Union ULPs
Interfering with an employee’s right to Conspiring with employers to

join a union. This could include bribing discriminate against employees on
employees not to vote for or join a the basis of union membership.
union or eliminating or threatening to Interfering with freedom of speech
eliminate jobs in some manner. or coercing or fining employees.
Discriminating among workers based Failing to respond to member
on union membership, either to complaints.
discourage or require membership, or Refusing to bargain in good faith.
based on employee complaints. Requiring unreasonable or
Refusing to bargain with a recognized discriminatory membership fees.
union or provide information material Directing prohibited work actions.
to negotiations.
Refusing to enforce contract
provisions.
Controlling or intervening in union
operations.
HR’s Role in Preventing Unfair Labor Practices
HR should make sure that all managers and supervisors understand guaranteed employee and employer rights, the terms
of union contracts, and the concept of an unfair labor practice. Training can be provided to illustrate specific speech and
behaviors that are allowed or prohibited by local laws—for example, asking questions that could be interpreted as spying
on union activities or treating employees in a way that could suggest preferential treatment for employees who are not
members of the union.
Dispute Resolution and Employee Discipline

Consults managers on how to supervise difficult employees, handle disruptive behaviors, and respond with the
appropriate level of corrective action.
Participates in or facilitates alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes (e.g., arbitration, mediation).
Conducts investigations into employee misconduct and suggests disciplinary action when necessary.
Oversees employee investigations and discipline.

Approaches to retaliation prevention.
Techniques for disciplinary investigations.
Types of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (e.g. mediation, arbitration) and their advantages and disadvantages.
Disciplinary procedures and approaches.
Dispute Resolution and Employee Discipline
Complaints arise frequently in the workplace. When they cannot be resolved by employees and supervisors or managers,
complaints may be formally lodged, and HR professionals are often called upon to assist with dispute resolution. This
requires skills in communication and conflict resolution and knowledge of investigation practices and disciplinary systems.
If complaints are filed outside the organization, it may also require interacting with third parties, such as lawyers or
government agencies.
Because an organization’s HR department is small and often overburdened, the HR director has supported
decentralization of several tasks. One such task is investigations. If the issue seems minor, the investigation is handled by
a program manager. If the investigation carries significant possible liability for the organization, however, the HR director
leads it.
In a recent incident, due to workload, the HR director allowed program management to investigate a claim of racial
hostility/discrimination. The issue seemed clear-cut enough; the actions either happened or did not. However, what the HR
director did not know is that the program manager had ulterior motives and the subsequent report to the HR director was
not true.
As a result of the program manager’s investigation report, the HR director supported the termination of what seemed to be
an inappropriate, perhaps racist, employee. However, because the terminated employee’s unemployment insurance claim
was denied, the employee contacted the HR director. The employee was able to provide proof that the program manager’s
report was false and that the termination was unfair.
The HR director then launched an investigation and concluded that the story, as presented by the program manager, was
indeed not true. The terminated employee was offered an opportunity to reinstate. The program manager who lied was
terminated. And HR is reviewing its investigation policies with the likely outcome of moving investigations back into the HR
office.
Termination is obviously a serious issue for an organization. HR professionals must demonstrate Ethical Practice and
Critical Evaluation to be fair and objective to all parties.
Workplace Conflict
Workplace conflicts can arise in a variety of forms and for a variety of reasons. HR may be an indirect participant, acting
on behalf of the organization, or a direct participant, working to resolve disputes within the function itself.
Employees may bring disputes with other employees to supervisors or managers for resolution—disputes that may be
driven by different opinions about the work itself or personal differences or offensive behaviors. Some of these disputes
may be successfully resolved by the supervisor or manager. Some, however, may be escalated to HR for investigation and
action.
Employees may make complaints about employers. Employees may charge that they are not being treated fairly or that
work conditions are unacceptable. Employers may complain that employees are not fulfilling the terms of employment or
have become disruptive and potentially harmful to other employees. In a unionized environment, these disputes are
handled according to grievance procedures in the collective bargaining agreement. In nonunionized environments, HR is
often involved in early responses to the dispute. Unresolved disputes may become complaints to third parties as
employees seek resolution through litigation or complaints to government agencies.
HR professionals attempt to investigate and resolve these conflicts by using their Communication and Relationship
Management competencies, their emotional intelligence, and their understanding of dispute resolution techniques.
Multicultural Aspects of Conflict Resolution

Across cultures, employees value transparency and fairness in conflict resolution. However, HR practitioners should be
aware of the cultural differences in their organizations and the cultural misunderstandings or biases that may drive
conflicts in a global organization and complicate the resolution of conflicts.
Cultures differ in their appetites and tolerances for conflict. Members of some cultures try to avoid direct conflict, while
others feel comfortable with it and use it as a tool to resolve disagreements. In some cultures employees may be reluctant
to express disagreement. It takes skill to recognize when these differences are interfering with identifying and resolving
conflicts in a mutually satisfying way.
Cultural differences also affect the way in which the existence of conflict is acknowledged and then resolved. Resolution of
a conflict in some cultures must be done privately, to save the disputants’ dignity or “face.” Cultural rules will also affect the
choice of a third-party judge. In some cultures, a well-respected elder with ties to both sides is most effective, while in
other cultures an effective mediator must be perceived as powerful and assertive.
Dispute Resolution
Note first that conflict resolution is a high-risk activity, and the following information is not intended to make HR
professionals expert in this skill. Practitioners are advised to seek opportunities to deepen their understanding of conflict
management techniques and to practice them in low-risk settings.
The first stage of dispute resolution is usually an informal meeting of the employee or employees with their immediate
manager. It is important that the manager listen carefully and ask questions so that the manager fully understands the
issue. This is necessary to resolve the dispute, but it also signals to the employee that the complaint is being taken
seriously. If a resolution can be reached, the manager clarifies key points and gains the employee’s agreement. If the
matter cannot be resolved immediately, the manager explains the next steps—for example, plans to investigate the
complaint further—and commits to meeting again.
If the dispute cannot be resolved at this first level, it is escalated to a more formal meeting, perhaps with a higher level of
management or an internal dispute resolution body such as a panel of peers. The meeting should be private and
confidential. It focuses on presenting and confirming facts (perhaps through witnesses). The meeting may conclude with a
resolution or with a commitment to further investigation or additional dispute resolution processes.
All those involved commit to:

Listening.
Managing their own emotions.
Agreeing on goals.
Focusing on issues and facts rather than personalities.
Considering all perspectives.
Engaging in problem solving and exploring alternative solutions together.
Reaching agreement on next steps.
The final step in this process is to communicate to the employee the results of any investigation and management’s
decision. If the employee is not satisfied with the outcome, the dispute may be escalated to the next level of management
or to dispute resolution by a neutral third party.
Workplace Retaliation
Retaliation in the workplace occurs when an employer, employment agency, or labor organization takes an adverse action
against an employee—often as a result of a conflict or complaint. In some cases, retaliation may be a form of unlawful
discrimination. Good follow-through in managing conflicts and complaints involves taking steps to prevent or reduce the
likelihood of a retaliation charge or lawsuit.
To prevent retaliation, employers should take the following steps:
Adopt and disseminate a strong antiretaliation policy. While this policy can be referenced in the organization’s
antidiscrimination and antiharassment policies, a separate antiretaliation policy may be more effective. It should
make clear that the organization will not tolerate retaliatory conduct, including such conduct based on an employee’s
opposition to job discrimination or harassment or participation in discrimination complaint proceedings.
Inform employees about the process for reporting alleged retaliation. The organization’s antiretaliation policy
should state to whom employees report retaliation. For example, employees could be instructed to go to anyone in
their chain of command or the organization’s HR office.
Train managers on retaliation. Individuals accused of discrimination or other unlawful behavior may lash out at the
accuser or witnesses. Managers should be trained on acceptable and unacceptable responses to protected activity
under the antidiscrimination laws.
Remind supervisors of the organization’s policy. Make sure that supervisors understand the organization’s policy
prohibiting retaliation against complainants or witnesses. Inform supervisors that they will be subject to disciplinary
action if they retaliate against individuals who make a complaint against them or who provide information related to a
complaint.
Monitor the treatment of employees. Monitor the treatment of employees who have made complaints or who have
provided information related to complaints to ensure that they are not subjected to retaliation. Carefully scrutinize
any proposed adverse action against a complainant or witness to ensure that it is based on a legitimate and not
retaliatory reason.
Investigate allegations and take corrective action if necessary. Investigate allegations of retaliation and take
prompt corrective action when retaliation occurs. Retaliation should be stopped even if it is not significant enough to
violate federal or local law to prevent it from escalating to those levels.
Conducting Investigations
HR may be responsible for conducting investigations of employee complaints that may result in discipline or discharge, or
HR may be responsible for making sure that investigations are fair, thorough, and culturally appropriate. To conduct
effective investigations, HR professionals should consider the steps described in Exhibit 38.
Exhibit 38: Conducting an Investigation
Step Action
1 Ensure confidentiality. The employer should explain to those involved in the

complaint that all information will be kept confidential to the extent possible in an
investigation.
2 Provide protection. Provide interim protection against continued harassment or
retaliation. This may require voluntary changes of schedule, leaves, or transfers.
3 Select the investigator. This individual should be able to work objectively and should
have experience in investigation and knowledge of the law in this area. The
investigator should communicate well, be observant and discreet, and pay attention to
details. Investigators may be internal or external to the organization. A team with
diverse skills and background may be used if their activities are well coordinated.
4 Create a plan. Develop a plan for gathering evidence and conducting interviews.
5 Develop interview questions. Questions should be designed to encourage

communication and focus on critical points.
6 Conduct interviews. The investigator should never offer opinions and should
maintain objectivity. Observations should be recorded. Follow-up questions will be
important in gathering evidence.
7 Make a decision. After a thorough gathering of evidence, the investigator

recommends action based on the evidence and the organization’s policies and
processes.
8 Close the investigation. Communicate the decision to the complainant and the
accused. Make sure that the complainant feels comfortable about returning to work.
Take necessary steps, which may include correcting the behavior and making sure
that it does not recur, providing damages to the complainant if appropriate, and
changing policies and training as needed to prevent recurrence.
9 Develop written summary of investigation results. The report should document
both what investigatory actions were taken and what information was collected.
Relevant policies should be cited. Conclusions should be described as well as
employer actions taken as a result of the investigation.
The effectiveness of investigations may help protect the organization from costly employee litigation or actions by local
governments but also contributes to a more positive workplace and a stronger employee brand.
Third-Party or Alternative Dispute Resolution

Third-party resolution, also referred to as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in some countries, uses an intermediary
to create solutions and dispel conflict. This method can have varying degrees of neutrality and formality as well as
complexity. In some Asian cultures, an intermediary may be chosen who knows both parties well, can hear both sides, and
can gain agreement on a solution, while in other cultures the intermediary is not familiar with either party.
The simplest forms of ADR could include an open-door policy (in which a superior helps resolve a conflict without potential
repercussions for the employee), a panel of trusted and respected superiors, or a panel of peers. An ombudsperson
system can help start the process: A designated person gathers evidence and brings the complaint to management for
action. More complex processes are formal mediation, which uses an outside expert in negotiation to help sides find
common ground, and arbitration, in which both sides agree to abide by the decision of an arbitrator.
Exhibit 39 lists the range of ADR options that are available to organizations.
Exhibit 39: Forms of ADR
ADR Option Description
Open-door policy Encourages employees to meet with an immediate supervisor

or manager to discuss workplace problems; in some
environments, it allows employees to approach anyone in the
chain of command. An open-door policy might be seen as
preemptive or preventive ADR.
Ombudsperson Designates a neutral third party (from either inside or outside

the organization) to investigate employee complaints
confidentially and help mediate disputes. The ombudsperson
may draw an opinion and may bring the dispute before
management but is usually not empowered to settle
grievances. The ombudsperson may advance unresolved
disputes to other forms of ADR.
Single designated Identifies a specific individual chosen by senior management

officer to conduct investigations and dispute resolution. The
credibility of this individual may depend on the credibility of
management.
Chosen officer Permits an employee to select an arbitrator from a group of

individuals. This allows employees to feel some control over
their futures.
Peer review Establishes a panel of employees (or employees and

managers) trained to work together to hear and resolve
employee complaints. The panel may be led by an HR
professional. It may not change organization policy but
sometimes may recommend changes to policy. Peer review is
sometimes limited to suspensions and discharges.
Mediation* Uses a neutral third person trained in mediation techniques to
help both sides assess the strengths and weaknesses of their
positions. The goal is to negotiate a mutually acceptable,
voluntary settlement. The mediator acts more as a facilitator
of agreement than as a judge making a decision. A settlement
cannot be imposed on either side.
Arbitration* Submits disputes to one or more impartial persons who listen

to both sides and make a final determination. Arbitration may
be binding (parties agree to be bound by the arbitrator’s
decision) or nonbinding (parties may seek other means of
resolution, including litigation).
*Some employers require that employees agree in writing to using mediation or
arbitration as a condition of employment, before the need for ADR arises.
Not all of the ADR options listed are legal or culturally acceptable in every country. It may be helpful in some instances to
work with legal counsel and local experts to develop dispute resolution policies.
Key Content
HR practitioners should remember that methods of dispute resolution (such as formal grievance procedures) may be
defined in collective bargaining agreements. In these cases, HR, managers, and supervisors must apply the grievance
process as it is defined in the labor contract.
Agency Complaints and Litigation

In some cases, employee and union complaints may be made to governmental or statutory agencies, and internal
resolution will no longer be an option for the organization. The external body will study the evidence presented and render
binding legal decisions. This possible course of action underscores the need for robust internal conflict reporting and
resolution systems that offer an alternative to external resolutions.
A survey by attorneys for the global law firm Proskauer Rose LLP studied external dispute resolution in seven countries
(Brazil, China, France, Germany, South Africa, Spain, and the U.K.) and found both similarities and differences. Generally,
the process begins with conciliation (generally through mediation) and proceeds to litigation if necessary. Conciliation
efforts may continue during litigation. Specialized employment courts are often used, although some issues may be
forwarded to civil courts. Country laws may tend to give an advantage to one party (employer or employee). Employers
may be required to produce complaint-related material. If they are found responsible, employers rarely have to pay
punitive damages, but they may have to rehire an employee and pay back wages to the date of termination.
Depending on the organization and other legal or cultural factors, HR’s role in responding to complaints and litigation may
be more active or passive. HR may play a lead role in resolving issues such as representing the company in mediation or
grievances, or they may influence or decide resolution strategies and settlement activities. Alternatively, HR may be asked
to play a more passive role—for example, by providing records and access to witnesses.
HR practitioners need to work closely with their organization’s leaders and perhaps legal counsel before issues arise so
that they understand the complaint process, the organization’s obligations and rights, and what actions HR should take as
soon as a complaint has been made. Responses can vary depending on local laws and practices.
Disciplining Employees
Disciplinary action may target violations of the organization’s values (examples include sexual harassment, discrimination,
or threatening behavior) but also violations of local norms and practices that threaten the harmony of the workplace. The
word “discipline” comes from the Latin word “disciplina,” which originally meant “instruction” or “knowledge” rather than
“punishment.” The emphasis in discipline may be seen then as corrective rather than punitive—focused on changing
behavior rather than simply punishing it. However, employees must be clear about how they have failed to conform to the
rules, why the rules are meaningful, what behavior will be expected in the future, and what consequences will occur if they
repeat the behavior.
HR must be aware of certain workplace behaviors that are protected from disciplinary action by local law and make sure
that managers and supervisors are aware of these exceptions. For example, many occupational health and safety laws
specify that employees may not be disciplined for refusing to work under unsafe conditions or for reporting these
conditions—referred to as whistleblowing . Whistleblowing may be seen as disloyalty meriting discharge in some
cultures, but in some countries whistleblowers are protected against dismissal that is directly related to the whistleblowing
activity.
Disciplinary systems in global organizations must produce prompt, focused, and consistent discipline that is delivered in a
manner that is legally compliant and culturally sensitive. Few employers enjoy potentially confrontational situations, and, in
certain cultures, managers may prefer to avoid these conflicts entirely. However, managers and supervisors must
remember that:
Infractions such as tardiness and absenteeism or disrespectful behavior to superiors and coworkers damage the
work environment for all employees and harm the employer brand and workplace productivity.
Failure to apply rules consistently to all employees may be grounds for a legal finding of unjust dismissal and trigger
financial penalties. It will also undermine perceptions of the employer’s fairness and employees’ trust.
Lack of consistency in discipline will become quickly apparent in a multinational organization with its global teams
and assignees.
Whether or not employees have defined legal rights guaranteed by a union contract, organizations should treat all their
employees equitably and fairly. Disciplinary procedures should ensure that employees have the opportunity to explain and
defend their actions against charges of violation or misconduct. It is a good business practice for an employer to do the
following:
Produce persuasive evidence of the employee’s culpability or negligence.
Give the employee a fair opportunity to present his or her side of the story.
Determine a penalty appropriate for the given offense.
Impose discipline that is consistent with the treatment that others have received for similar infractions.
Incorporate HR review of all material/serious disciplinary actions to make sure that discipline is consistent with
similar historical cases and that it does not violate union contracts, employment or other laws, or cultural norms.
Preventing Disciplinary Situations

The goal in disciplining employees is to avoid having to discipline employees in the first place. It makes more sense to
shape behavior in the desired manner from the beginning and thus minimize the need for disciplinary action. The
organization can take preventive measures such as the following:
Review codes of conduct before implementing them. HR may be able to identify obstacles to compliance and
adjust the work environment or the code/expectations in a proactive manner. This is especially important when
applying a headquarters code to global operations.
Set clear expectations. Employees and managers need to have the same expectations. Job descriptions need to
contain enough detail so that the employee knows what he or she is supposed to do and the level at which he or she
needs to perform.
Behave consistently. Actions and decisions should be based on policies, procedures, and work rules. These may
be written or expressed in other ways—for example, through management example or training. Managers and
supervisors can review records of similar situations in the past.
Establish a climate of communication. Establishing and supporting an ongoing climate of two-way communication
between employee and supervisor is critical. Sometimes communication can lead to solutions. For example, a
manager may learn that a repeatedly tardy employee has unusually heavy family obligations.
Maintain an open-door policy. Bottom-to-top communication can be further enhanced through an open-door policy.
Again, managers should be aware that cultural differences will affect the degree to which employees seek communication
with superiors.
In addition, employment law may influence practices. In the U.S., for example, because of the employment at-will principle,
managers and supervisors may be encouraged to use discretion (and consistent treatment) rather than rely on a highly
specific and written policy. Policies dictating that all infractions will be dealt with in an identical manner could create the
appearance of an implied contract and constitute an exception to employment at-will. In other countries, past practices
may affect future agreements.
Providing Due Process

A disciplinary action is intended to protect the organization’s resources from risks posed by an employee’s actions—which
can be lost productivity, low quality of products or services, higher equipment costs, and negative impacts on other
employees—but to do so in a way that provides due process to the employee being disciplined.
Providing due process is an issue of justice and consistency (and is therefore affected by the organization’s culture), but it
may also be a legal issue. Failure to provide due process in any termination that does not involve a summary offense can
be used in legal complaints by employees who charge that they have been unjustly terminated. (A summary offense is not
preceded by any of the usual warning steps in the discipline process. If the employee is found, after investigation and
hearing, to have committed the offense, the employee is subject to immediate termination or sanction.)
Exhibit 40 lists seven basic tests often used in judicial hearings to determine if an employee has been wrongfully
disciplined or terminated.
Exhibit 40: Providing Due Process in Employee Discipline
Tests of Due Process in Disciplining Employees
An employee is informed of the The employee has a right to question

employer’s expectations and the the evidence and defend himself or
process and consequences herself.
attached to failure to meet those The employee has a right to appeal
expectations. the disciplinary decision.
The disciplinary actions are A constructive discipline process is
consistent and predictable. used.
The employer’s decision is based The employee is considered as an
on factual evidence. individual.
Constructive Discipline
The type and severity of disciplinary action depend on the type and frequency of the offense. Some actions merit
immediate dismissal. For example, if an employee were to threaten a supervisor physically or intimidate the supervisor
with a weapon, the employee would most likely be immediately suspended and possibly terminated, pending investigation.
Other actions call for constructive discipline.
Constructive discipline (also called progressive discipline) is a form of corrective action that implements increasingly
severe penalties. It may involve punishment, but the punishment is intended to shape behavior rather than to inflict
economic, psychological, or social pain. Constructive discipline applies B. F. Skinner’s reinforcement theory of human
behavior. An employer can provide
Positive punishment or an added requirement—e.g., an employee may be required to complete a performance
improvement plan or attend counseling for anger management.
Negative punishment or the removal of a valued stimulus—e.g., withholding a promotion or training opportunity,
imposing a suspension without pay.
The choice of punishment must be based on the incident and its impact on the organization and other employees.
There is another Skinnerian technique called extinction—eliminating a behavior by never rewarding it. In a workplace,
ignoring a behavior is not a recommended solution to changing problematic conduct. It exposes an organization to
significant ethical and legal risks.
In some countries, employers may be legally obligated to use constructive discipline, and employees who can show that
their treatment did not conform to the employer’s policy, union agreements, and/or legal requirements for termination may
be entitled to some form of redress (e.g., compensation, reversal of punishments imposed by the employer).
However, constructive discipline offers benefits beyond legal compliance. It can help defend the employer against costly
civil suits charging unfair and capricious behavior. It can also give employees who offer value to the organization a second
chance to align their behavior with the organization’s expectations. In this case, both the employer and the employee win.
Constructive Discipline Process

The constructive disciplinary action generally begins with the least severe response and moves to a more severe
response. Systems may vary, however, in the number of steps or chances the employee receives, the use of written or
verbal warnings (written documentation is valued in litigious cultures), and the time frame used to calculate the number of
repeated infractions. For example, some organizations will set a time limit for a repeated infraction. If the employee does
not commit an infraction again within this time period, the process is considered ended. Some systems count only a
repetition of the same infraction, while others may add any infraction against work rules to the disciplinary situation.
Systems may also include some mechanism for employee appeal—for example, through a panel of peers.
In an environment that does not legally stipulate a set procedure for discipline, the typical sequence of constructive
disciplinary actions is as follows:
1. Verbal counseling, problem-solving, and open dialogue. The mildest type of disciplinary action can increase
understanding among everyone involved, reduce workplace tension, and open up communication. It is advisable to
have the discussion as soon as possible after becoming aware of the problem. The goal is to resolve the problem
before it worsens.
2. First formal warning. An official, formal warning should first be made—orally or in writing, according to local
business practices and legal requirements. Managers should set clear expectations for the employee’s behavior.
Discussions should be held in private. A public reprimand, especially in certain cultures, embarrasses the employee
and his or her coworkers. The manager often loses the trust and respect of all who observe the public reprimand.
Managers need to be specific about the performance issue and what needs to be done to correct it.
3. Second warning. If the employee fails to correct the problematic behavior or commits another infraction, another
warning may be issued. This is optional; some systems do not include a second warning. If the first warning was
oral, the second warning may be in writing to document the disciplinary process. Both the problem and the needed
correction should be described in specific, objective terms. The tone should be professional. If warranted, an
employee may be put on probation. A copy of this written warning with the employee’s signature should be kept in
the personnel files.
4. Final warning. The final written warning should include a deadline for improvement and time off, if warranted.
Disciplinary time off or suspension may be with or without pay. (Note that local law and collective bargaining
agreements may restrict employers’ disciplinary options.) This final written warning should clearly state that
continuation of the documented issue(s) will lead to termination. The employee should sign a form acknowledging
that she or he has read and understands the terms of the written warning (even if she or he does not agree with
them).
5. Discharge or termination. Discharge is the last resort, used for repeated occurrences or severe violations.
If the discipline process has been effective and the employee has changed the problematic behavior, managers should
review the situation several months later and check that the improvement has continued and that there has been no
retaliation of management against the employee or the employee against other employees. The matter should be checked
again after another few months. Only at that point can the matter be considered truly resolved.
Terminating Employment for Disciplinary Reasons

Termination has serious consequences for the employee but also for the organization. It can disrupt workplace harmony
and damage engagement and productivity. It can also—even when handled well—lead to costly litigation. However,
avoiding termination can introduce the same risks. This is a situation then that requires careful thought and judgment.
Using the advice in Exhibit 41 can help HR professionals implement termination decisions more effectively.
Exhibit 41: Terminating Employment for Discipline Reasons
Terminating Employment for Discipline Reasons
Never summarily discharge. It is Always conduct a “final filter” review.

prudent for an employer to never Review the investigator’s findings
terminate on the spot even if the and recommendations to determine if
employee has seemingly made a they are complete, accurate, etc.,
dischargeable offense. First before making a final decision. Make
complete a thorough and objective sure that recommendations are
investigation. Depending upon the consistent with previous similar
seriousness of the investigation, the situations.
employee may be “suspended Pinpoint the basis of the discharge.
subject to discharge pending further The discharge reason(s) must be
investigation.” carefully identified and articulated.
Make sure your investigation is Most employers orally communicate
thorough, complete, and well this information and then document it
documented. The employee’s in writing.
supervisor and department manager Whenever possible, inform the
and/or human resources staff are employee in person of the decision
normally involved. Collect evidence to terminate and the reason. An
on both sides. organization should have a clear
Conduct employee interviews. During policy on who makes the decision to
interviews with the employee, the terminate and how an employee is
approach should be investigative, not informed of the decision. Supervisors
adversarial or accusatory. should consult with HR about any
Do not delay. Investigations should potential termination. It is advisable
begin as soon as possible, be that the supervisor’s manager
conducted deliberately but with approve the termination.
dispatch, and the results Be alert to possible reactions. Plan
communicated to the employee as for possible employee reactions,
soon as possible. such as violence, vandalism, or theft.
HR's Role in the Disciplinary Process

HR must ensure that policies on discipline are legally compliant, defensible, and culturally sensitive. In addition, HR
professionals can take steps to ensure that employees understand work rules and expectations and that managers and
supervisors are properly trained to deliver discipline in a manner that is organizationally and individually effective.
To fulfill this responsibility, HR can:

Ensure that the organization’s code of conduct reflects the organization’s values and complies with applicable laws
and that the code is publicized adequately throughout the organization.
Involve local HR in identifying local issues to be addressed in the code because of local laws or customs.
Ensure training of all managers and supervisors—the key players in ensuring effective, appropriate, fair, and
consistent discipline.
Monitor compliance with policy and local practices.
Functional Area #10: Technology Management
Technology Management involves the use of existing, new, and emerging technologies to support the HR
function, and the development and implementation of policies and procedures governing the use of
technologies in the workplace.
Implements and uses technology solutions that support or facilitate delivery of effective HR services and storage of
critical employee data.
Implements HR information systems (HRIS) that integrate with and complement other enterprise information
systems.
Develops and implements organizational standards and policies for maintaining confidentiality of employee data.
Uses technologies in a manner that protects workforce data.
Provides guidance to stakeholders on effective standards and policies for the use of technologies in the workplace
(e.g., social media, corporate and personal e-mail, internet messaging).
Coordinates and manages vendors implementing HR technology solutions.
Uses technologies that collect, access, and analyze data and information, in order to understand business
challenges and recommend evidence-based solutions.

Evaluates and implements technology solutions that support the achievement of HR’s strategic direction, vision, and
goals.
Evaluates and selects vendors to provide HR technology solutions.
Designs and implements technology systems that optimize and integrate HR functional areas.
Develops and implements technology-driven approaches to self-service that enable managers and employees to
perform basic people-related transactions (e.g., scheduling, timekeeping, compensation administration, benefit
enrollment, information changes).
Key Concepts:
Approaches to electronic self-service for basic HR and people management functions (e.g., scheduling, timekeeping,
benefit enrollment).
Data and information management (e.g., data integrity, confidentiality, security, disclosure).
HRIS capabilities and use.
Policies and procedures for procurement.
Policies and practices for technology and social media use (e.g., bring-your-own-device, websites, computers for
personal activity).
Software for recruiting and applicant tracking.

Technology Management
Technology makes it easier for HR professionals to work productively and rationally—to gather, organize, and share
information and to use that data to detect patterns and causes and make more informed, evidence-based decisions.
Managing HR technology is a good application for the goals of risk management—to maximize opportunities for positive
outcomes and to minimize the chances for negative outcomes. The technology purchasing process can improve HR
productivity and services, but only if it is planned and managed well. Deployed technology, such as employee and
manager self-service and mobile computing, can increase the organization’s productivity and enable HR
recommendations to management that demonstrate HR’s value to the organization. However, technology also creates
vulnerabilities as it gathers, stores, and transmits data. Employee data privacy can be compromised, and the
organization’s information and processes can be exposed to unauthorized access, tampering, and theft.
HR professionals are not expected to become IT experts, but they must know enough to work with IT to integrate and
support HR information systems (HRIS), to take advantage of labor-saving workplace technology (e.g., automated
messaging, project management or presentation software), and to develop policies that protect data belonging to the
employee and to the organization.
HR and Technology

Implements HR information systems (HRIS) that integrate with and complement other enterprise information
systems.
Uses technologies that collect, access, and analyze data and information, in order to understand business
challenges and recommend evidence-based solutions.
goals.
Designs and implements technology systems that optimize and integrate HR functional areas.
Develops and implements technology-driven approaches to self-service that enable managers and employees to
perform basic people-related transactions (e.g., scheduling, timekeeping, compensation administration, benefit
enrollment, information changes).

Approaches to electronic self-service for basic HR and people management functions (e.g., scheduling, timekeeping,
benefit enrollment).
HRIS capabilities and use.
Software for recruiting and applicant tracking.
HR and Technology
HR professionals can benefit from technologies such as human resource information systems (HRIS) in many areas of
their work. Understanding a few basic concepts about information systems can help HR professionals see opportunities
and anticipate technological issues.
The role of HR is to find ways to translate the organization’s strategic vision into action targeted at achieving goals. The
HR practitioner in this example combines business and competitor knowledge (Business Acumen), technological
expertise, and leadership skills (Leadership and Navigation) to shift perceptions about the opportunities provided by social
media.
Due to a retirement, an organization has its first new chief executive officer in 37 years. The new female CEO was
promoted from within and wants to jump-start her tenure and legacy with an aggressive social media strategy. In particular,
she wants the organization to connect with an employee and customer demographic that has been elusive: Millennials. As
part of this plan, the CEO hires a new tech-savvy practitioner to be the senior vice president (SVP) of HR and sets an
aggressive KPI to recruit no less than 75% of all new job applicants using only social media.
To date, the organization has had no direct social media presence. The organization’s legal and IT departments had
convinced the leadership team that there were too many risks associated with using social media. As a result, the
organization’s policy has been to prohibit all employees from using or accessing social media while at work. The new HR
SVP quickly realizes that until the organization’s leadership team understands the current online candidate experience
benchmarked against that of industry peers, they will not be able to appreciate the lost business opportunity.
The HR SVP creates a workshop for the executive committee that goes through, as a group, step-by-step, the actual
online candidate experience of four benchmarked organizations, plus their own. The executives are also shown a public
website that compiles data and ranks organizations (including theirs) as employers of choice based upon information
submitted by current and former employees. Lastly, the HR SVP presents a summary of information sourced from the
other organizations’ annual reports, which includes estimates of their employee and customer demographics and direct
references to their successes or challenges associated with using social media.
By tangibly demonstrating a real-life candidate experience using the social media interface of competitors, the new SVP of
HR is able to show the executive team what a successful social media experience is, the risks associated with blocking
employees’ social media access, and the risks associated with not proactively utilizing social media.
Big Data and HR
The term “big data” came into use at the end of the 20th century to describe the explosion of data that could be captured
and stored as the result of computing and communication advances. The era of big data has impelled HR professionals to
become more knowledgeable about and better users of technology.
Three features of big data have changed technology requirements for organizations.
Volume. Datasets have grown so large that new tools are required to store, access, and analyze them. Storage
using cloud computing services—in which data is saved to remote servers that are connected through the Internet
—has become a popular way to manage increasing amounts of data.
Velocity. Data can flow into a system so quickly that its currency becomes an issue. Data analysis now requires
real-time or almost real-time information. Data must be updated frequently or continuously throughout all points in
the system.
Variety. Data is not only numbers now. It may be still images, videos, or audio recordings. It may be imported from
social media, mobile phones, or sensors (e.g., wearable technology such as badges). Systems must be capable of
taking in these diverse forms and integrating them for storage and access.
Big data makes it more possible to see patterns and trends, to create models that isolate possible causes and predict
outcomes. Reliable, current, and analyzable data helps HR professionals to make decisions based on facts or evidence
and to objectively measure the effectiveness of their actions.
To capitalize on the promise of big data, HR professionals must gather the right data at the right intervals. Systems must
be capable of taking in and refreshing diverse forms of information, and they must be scalable—capable of growing in
capacity with greater efficiency. Systems must offer various analytical tools, because the value of data lies not in the size
of the database but in the quality of its analysis. For example, employee profiles can be analyzed to correlate performance
level and tenure with different variables, such as level and type of education, location, or personality assessments. The
findings can be used to detect problems (e.g., a sudden increase in turnover in one location), to predict surpluses and
deficits in workforce needs (both numbers and competencies), or to improve candidate selection criteria.
Key Content
According to Alec Levenson in “The Promise of Big Data for HR,” HR professionals need to expand and improve what they
know about their organizations and business environments, and he identifies three ways big data can help:
Collecting new data. New data collection about when, where, and how employees do their jobs to provide business
process insights, reduce errors, and increase efficiencies.
Using existing data more effectively. To better understand employee engagement and motivation and why
employees do what they do.
Better strategic analysis. Mapping how information flows in organizations and the relationships that people rely on to
do their work.
Key Issues in Acquiring Technology

In some instances, IT departments will take the lead in providing technology that meets the organization’s standards, but
often HR will work with IT experts to select technology that meets their needs. In addition, HR professionals may want to
add tools that increase their productivity—tools that support mobility and collaboration. HR professionals should be aware
of basic information system terminology and key issues that affect the choice of technology and the ability to use it
successfully.
Information System Components
An information system (IS) can be defined simply as a way to collect, organize, store, analyze, and share data.
Understanding the components of information systems can make HR departments better purchasers of technology. It can
also help HR professionals communicate their needs to the IT function.
Exhibit 42 shows the basic components of information systems.
Exhibit 42:
Basic
Components
of
Information
Systems
The presentation tier is the user interface with the system, the point at which the user can enter requests and
receive responses. The interface may be a traditional computer monitor or a mobile device. It should incorporate a
level of security to control access. It should be adaptable to users with different physical abilities (e.g., sight, hearing,
physical movement).
The logic tier (or business tier) is composed of system software and application software that enable operations.
System software includes the operating system, which runs the interface with the presentation tier (or user), moves
data back and forth between the data tier and software, manages communication with hardware components (e.g.,
video cards, displays, printers), and controls system resources. Application software offers specific functionality (e.g.,
project management software that includes budgeting and scheduling tools); it must be customized to communicate
with the system software. Application software may be located on the computer’s hard drive or on-premises server. It
may also be located on a public network—the Internet—and accessed via the cloud. The most effective software
uses easy-to-interpret graphic displays and interface techniques such as drag-and-drop and click-and-paste. HR
professionals should aim at becoming adept in using the many applications that can make their jobs easier—from
standard word processing, spreadsheet, graphics and presentations, e-mail, and task management programs to
voice and graphic recognition.
The data tier stores the information that will be used by the application tier to respond to user queries. Data can be
stored on local drives, removable devices, and servers. The servers may be on-premises or remote, accessed over
special private lines or over the Internet/cloud. One of the challenges in designing information systems is minimizing
the time applications must spend waiting for responses to data requests. Another challenge is the currency of the
information in the system. This depends on how frequently data is updated—whether it is done in batches (usually at
low-traffic or low-use times) or continuously. A continuously updated system is desirable but can run the risk of being
frustratingly slow for users.
The communications tier enables sharing of data and applications by networking a computer (or mobile device)
with other computers or servers. Networks can be private—e.g., local area networks, privately operated clouds, or
virtual private networks (VPNs). VPNs can be used to extend secure and private local networks to remote users by
means of public networks. This allows an employee to work remotely on a supported digital device. Public networks
are created via the Internet/cloud.
Integration
Integration refers to the extent to which the users in a system can share the same data. Enterprise resource planning
(ERP) systems are designed to allow the different parts of an organization to access the same data and perform more
efficiently. For example, operations can see sales forecasts and orders and schedule work, logistics departments can
visualize the progress of orders, and customer relationship management teams can access customer histories, profiles,
and current order information. The ERP vendor guarantees integration among its products. In other words, the payroll
application can communicate with the centralized database.
Over time ERP products or suites have incorporated more organizational functions, including HR. An entire organization
may select an ERP that includes an HR information system (HRIS)—a type of technology that supports HR functions
and enables HR to gather, store, maintain, retrieve, revise, analyze, and report HR data.
Some HR users may find ERP solutions too limited, however. The applications are designed for a generalized user and
may not serve unique situations or satisfy user preferences. For these users, there are a host of HR technology products,
called “best of breed” (BOB) systems. However, these products will be able to communicate with the organization’s
database with only varying degrees of success. (And claims of compatibility should not be accepted without
demonstration.) This could mean having to manually add relevant organizational data to the system’s database, which
consumes resources and can introduce errors. The vendor or the organization’s own IT function could also create a
unique software bridge to the database, but this is also resource-intensive.
In addition, individual HR departments or professionals may find general productivity applications (not specifically
designed for HR) that they would like to integrate with their work environments. Again, these products’ compatibility with
common ERP or BOB applications varies, and again IT may be called upon to help implement and support these
applications.
In the end, an organization may have an ERP, the HR function may have a BOB system, and individual departments may
have purchased specific applications for their own use. Achieving security, consistency, control, and integration becomes
even more challenging. This is one of the reason’s HR needs to develop a collaborative relationship with the organization’s
IT function. It is in the interests of both functions to assess the benefits and risks of technology purchases.
Scalability
Big data and increased automation and self-service capabilities have created an issue of scalability—how to increase the
amount of data stored without increasing processing time and how to manage capacity. Minimizing processing time is a
technical design challenge; increasing capacity is an economic challenge. It is difficult to build capacity for future needs
without creating waste in current practices.
This has been the appeal of cloud computing. The service subscriber pays only for the amount of memory, processing
time, or bandwidth that it uses. The service manages and maintains the hardware and guarantees its security.
The cloud offers flexibility and cost savings. It is the simplest way for mobile users to access the organization’s data, and it
saves the organization the considerable cost of purchasing servers and creating data centers or server rooms.The
economic advantages of cloud computing must be weighed, however, against its risks. Is a cloud storage service provider
equipped to prevent the loss of data (through contingent backup systems, for example) and to block unauthorized access
to stored data? Will security patches be applied promptly and updated as required?
Security
Maintaining the security of the organization’s data and work processes is a constant concern. It affects the design of
systems, the choice of equipment and software, operating and maintenance processes, and policies aimed at supporting
secure practices. When acquiring technology, users may be concerned about:
Security vulnerabilities created through integration. For example, organizations must be confident that vendors
accessing the organization’s systems can access only certain areas and that only vendors can access information—
i.e., a back door does not exist in the application to allow unauthorized access by unknown parties.
Managing users’ security levels. For example, users may be assigned graduated levels of security that provide them
access only to specified areas in the information system.
Governance. Technology should be able to document all transactions and in this way reveal who has accessed the
system, when they accessed it, and what they did.
HR Technology Applications
HR can apply current technology products to most of its core and talent management functions. The breadth of these
applications is shown in Exhibit 43.
Exhibit 43: General HR Technology Applications
Core Applications Talent Management Applications
Employee records Talent acquisition

Payroll Applicant tracking systems
Time and attendance Recruiting (posting jobs to
Shift management (managing different recruitment channels)
scheduled time off and assigning Pre-hire assessment and
sufficient workers with the required screening
skills to each work period) Onboarding (tracking completion
Benefits administration of required actions)
Communications (could include Performance management
employee surveys) Succession planning
Data analysis Compensation management (internal
Project management review for consistency, external
Report generation (including comparisons)
graphical representation of analysis Learning management system
results) (tracking employee completion of
required training)
Strategic workforce planning
These software products can:
Automate complex processes and allow HR professionals to focus on more strategic and tactical work. Applicant
tracking systems (ATS) receive and store applications, review applications and résumés using key words, send
responses, and arrange interviews and additional screening. They can include recruiting applications, posting
openings on various job sites and social media. Applicant progress through the process can be visualized. Some
products can integrate with other applications, such as career management programs, reaching appropriate internal
candidates directly, or workforce plans, identifying some candidates who may meet future needs.
Produce data that can be used for other applications. For example, skill profiles in employee data records can be
used to identify employees who possess the types of skills and knowledge the organization will require. HR’s talent
management programs may focus on these individuals to ensure that they are engaged and retained and perhaps to
develop them for leadership positions.
Wearable technology can automate the capture of employee data. It usually takes the form of clothing or accessories
(e.g., glasses, a watch) that have sensors, computing capacity, and the ability to link to a remote network. Current
devices tend to be prefaced with “smart” (e.g., smartglasses, smartclothing, smartwatches). From an HR
perspective, wearable technology can be used to encourage healthy behaviors (e.g., fitness trackers), to increase
productivity by freeing employees’ hands (e.g., smartglasses), and to monitor employees’ health and safety in
stressful physical conditions (e.g., wearable location and vital signs monitoring). When information is gathered and
stored, issues can arise about employee data privacy and security.
Support data analysis to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of HR activities. For example, ATS dashboards
and analytics can show key performance metrics, such as time-to-hire.
Support compliance-related activities. ATS can measure compliance with internal hiring goals and legal
requirements and issue reports on diversity in recruiting and hiring.
Software as a Service
HR technology can be purchased outright (as a stand-alone application or part of an HRIS), or it can be purchased
through a subscription. Software as a service (SaaS) is software that is owned, delivered, and managed remotely by one
or more providers. The software is delivered over the Internet, rather than installed on a computer, to contracted
customers at any time, on a pay-for-use basis or as a subscription based on use metrics. SaaS applications typically run
over the cloud, which means that users need only Internet access and a compatible browser in order to access the
software.
An SaaS application is delivered to multiple customers simultaneously and securely. A customer can order additional
capacity, add-on components, or features. Regular software updates can be applied relatively seamlessly by the SaaS
provider, helping to ensure that customers have the most recent version with the most current maintenance and the latest
enhancements. These needs are fulfilled without the technical or licensing barriers common to installed software.
SaaS can save organizations—especially small and medium-size organizations—time, money, and resources.
Artificial Intelligence and HR

The use of artificial intelligence (AI)—the ability of a computer to imitate human thought and behavior—will continue to
evolve and will deliver new capabilities to HR technologies:
Self-learning machines may change their behavior based on the responses they receive. Rather than merely
following programmed instructions (such as one would see in a defined branching tree of questions and answers in a
voice answering system), they will begin to develop models and apply them to individual situations. This can improve
the experience of customer help lines.
These machines may be equipped with optical and speech recognition, which will enhance their learning but also
make them more accessible to users with physical restrictions.
Virtualization may allow the creation of aural or visual “representatives” who can communicate easily with users.
Self-Service Technologies
Self-service technologies can reduce the transactional work of HR.
Employee Self-Service Technologies

Employee self-service (ESS) technologies provide employees with access to their personal HR data and the ability to
handle many questions and job-related transactions that otherwise would fall to management or administrative staff. An
ESS can guide a new hire through the onboarding process, delivering required communications, facilitating security
processes, and allowing him or her to enroll in benefits. Existing employees can log time and schedule vacations, file
expense reports, update personal information, manage their performance reviews and career development plans, and
access organizational information (such as learning and career opportunities). For employees, this means improved
visibility of important information and increased convenience; for organizations, this translates to significant cost savings
and efficiencies. HR head count is often reduced.
Employees access self-service through web pages on the organization’s intranet—”portals” that may be customized to
users or user groups and that may be connected with vendor sites, such as firms managing retirement plans. The portals
may be managed by vendors, reducing the burden on HR and IT. Their 24/7 availability—accessible at all hours, every day
of the week—appeals to today’s workers, who may engage with the ESS in their spare time from remote locations. It also
serves the needs of organizations with a workforce spread over time zones and limited access to local HR services.
Manager Self-Service Technologies

Manager self-service (MSS) websites provide managers with access to current data on their employees and budgets and
allow them to perform for themselves transactions that previously required HR’s implementation. This eliminates rounds of
e-mails and allows the manager to make a change and move on.
Through an MSS portal, managers may:

View information and create reports on the employees working for them. For example, managers might use MSS to
prepare for and complete performance appraisal documentation for subordinates, to authorize leaves, or to create a
report summarizing information about their staff.
Complete transactions such as authorizing pay raises, promoting employees, approving leave requests, or changing
an employee’s classification. Portals may be customized to allow managers to perform only certain actions. Actions
can trigger automatic notices to relevant departments, such as payroll.
Manage functions such as performance management, succession planning, and onboarding.
As with ESS, when managers handle transactions, there are cost savings for HR and improved efficiencies for the
manager and the organization. In addition, employee data is more secure since it remains inside the secure system and
not in unsecured e-mails or paper spreadsheets. HR organizations that have implemented MSS technologies also report
improved relations with internal clients. Managers see HR less as a transactional tool and more as a strategic resource.
IT Purchasing Process

Coordinates and manages vendors implementing HR technology solutions.
goals.
Evaluates and selects vendors to provide HR technology solutions.

Policies and procedures for procurement.
IT Purchasing Process
Technology can be an asset or a loss, depending on how thoughtfully HR professionals carry out the process for acquiring
it. The process begins with identifying the needs that can be solved through the technology and then proceeds through
developing requirements, identifying and assessing offerings, developing a business case, and implementing the new
technology.
The HR function in an energy company was performing many talent-related activities (e.g., performance management,
training assignments and tracking, succession planning) manually—as paperwork. Managers and staff found the process
time-consuming, inefficient, prone to errors, and not transparent. The lack of transparency led to fears of bias and weak
employee engagement. In addition, the process did not provide accurate and timely reporting for follow-up or strategic
decision making.
Calling on the Leadership and Navigation competency, the HR professional assigned to address the issue set out to find a
sponsor in the organization who would promote the investment to senior management. With a sponsor in place, the HR
professional researched the HRIS products on the market, comparing them to what comparable HR organizations were
using—an example of the Critical Evaluation competency.
Having selected likely vendors, the HR professional worked with them to demonstrate the products to decision makers.
The HR professional emphasized in the business case for the investment the savings from the efficiency the HRIS would
provide but also the effect that improved transparency and ethical conduct would have on the organization’s culture
(Ethical Practice and Global and Cultural Effectiveness).
When the purchase was approved and made, the HR professional worked with the vendor to “brand” self-service portals in
a way that would help employees accept the technology more readily. The HR professional revised HR’s policies and
procedures to reflect the changed processes and prepared a communication campaign to support a successful launch and
widespread employee acceptance of the change (the Communication and Consultation competencies).
Developing a Process for Purchasing Technology
The process for acquiring and implementing HR technology depends on the scope of the technology. Is the product an
HRIS that will be integrated with internal databases and external vendors, or is it a simple application that requires no
integration and has only one user? The steps taken will also depend on the organization’s culture and processes. Is there
a process for procurement that defines steps and conveys authority to make purchases? Is there an IT department, and
does it specify requirements for technology purchases? Does the organization have a brand that it wants to apply to all its
internal and external communications? How readily do the users accept change?
The process must therefore be customized to the situation. Still, the acquisition of technology—no matter its size or
complexity—will benefit from a systematic approach that minimizes mistakes and waste.
IT as a Partner
The IT function or provider is an integral partner in the acquisition process. First, the function is a key source of information
about the organization’s current technology and the requirements and capabilities of many technology products. They
know how to research technology. Second, IT has its own needs that may be affected by HR’s technology. IT leaders want
to know how a purchased technology will affect the organization’s information system. Will it create conflicts or security
vulnerabilities? Will it overburden servers? Third, IT will be instrumental in providing the necessary technical support for
implementing and maintaining the technology.
Securing IT’s involvement early on can make the process itself more smooth and more efficient and can improve the
quality and effectiveness of the selected technology.
Conduct a Technology Needs Assessment

The first step in selecting technology is to define what HR wants the technology to do. How will the technology improve
service and/or productivity? Available technology should not define needs. The fact that there is technology that can
perform a certain task does not mean that it is needed or that it is the right solution. So the process must start with an
internal assessment.
To assess need, HR should identify all stakeholders, since their involvement throughout the process will support a good
decision. Stakeholders include those signing off on procurement, HR staff and employees who will be using the
technology, IT who will be involved in implementing the technology, and possibly compliance experts. If practical, HR may
want to assemble an acquisition team that represents these different stakeholders’ perspectives.
Exhibit 44 lists some questions that must be answered during the assessment.
Exhibit 44: Assessing Technology Needs
Assessing Technology Needs
HR’s Needs What HR objectives is the technology aligned with?

What problems does it solve, or what opportunities does it
allow HR to capture?
What does the technology have to do or produce?
What are the budget and technical constraints?
What compliance issues may exist?
Users’ Needs How will the user interact with the technology? What does
the user need to understand, see, and do?
What will restrict use of the technology (e.g., literacy, color
perception, hearing, high-speed access, fear of
technology)?
Are there different types of users who need to see or do
different things or who may have different levels of access
to data?
What data does the user need to access? Where is it
located?
Organization’s How does this technology align with the organization’s

Needs current strategy?
How does it align with the organization’s current and future
needs?
What is the organization’s risk appetite? How much control
does the organization prefer to exert over its activities?
Prioritize Technology Requirements

The needs assessment should generate a list of requirements, which can be used to review available technology solutions
and narrow options. Exhibit 45 shows how the organization’s priorities for flexibility and control can affect technology
options. The choices frequently present tradeoffs. Direct ownership of hardware or software increases control, which can
be an issue for organizations that must minimize risks to operations and security. However, it decreases flexibility and
agility—the ability to change technology quickly and with lower costs. For example, HR may decide to investigate SaaS
solutions because the organization is undergoing rapid growth and change. A solution for today may not meet tomorrow’s
needs. However, the SaaS solution must include a customizable interface so that it can align with the organization’s
culture (or multiple subcultures). The technology may also need to be compatible with existing internal or vendor
technologies or with social media platforms. Will the SaaS solution fulfill those needs?
Exhibit 45:
Acquisition
Options in
Technology
Purchases
HR should explore with an IT consultant whether to use an integrated solution (e.g., an ERP HRIS that performs multiple
functions and can serve multiple HR departments in different locations) or to use multiple smaller best-of-breed (BOB)
systems, each supporting a different HR department or performing a single task.
Exhibit 46 compares the advantages and disadvantages of each option.
Exhibit 46: Advantages and Disadvantages of Integrated vs. Best-of-Breed Solutions

Advantages Disadvantages
Integrated Solutions
Feature a common interface “look and feel” Offer minimal customization options;
across applications, making learning and because of their large scale and integrated
transitions for users easier. nature, it can be prohibitively expensive to
Use integrated data and technological customize or to maintain customizations as
infrastructure, reducing the need to manage new versions of the underlying package are
multiple architectures. released.
Provide greater ease of integrating data from Do not necessarily offer the best solutions in
multiple HR functions. each functional area.
Reduce the complexity of vendor Are challenging to upgrade, because a
management, because there is only one change to one function may have dramatic
vendor. impacts on others.
Can be less expensive per application to Slow down the introduction of new features
implement than BOB. and upgrades due to complexity.
Best-of-Breed Solutions
Can develop a “best fit” solution for each Pose difficulties in integrating data across
functional area. applications.
Provide quicker implementation, because the Present increased learning curves for each
system is simpler and affects fewer application because of the lack of consistent
employees. interface.
Do not lock into a single vendor for all needs. Require careful management of relationships
Allow vendors to be more responsive to user with multiple vendors, which can be
needs. challenging.
Make it possible to purchase only the Demand interoperability among different
functionality needed. applications, which may not be easy.
The issue of the compatibility of the organization’s ERP platform with best-of-breed applications should be discussed
thoroughly with the IT function or provider. What integration is required to perform the desired work processes? The issue
may become even more complicated and costly if a purchased BOB product needs to be customized to perform certain
functions or to integrate with the organization’s platform. This will require IT collaboration with the vendor and considerable
IT support when the BOB product vendor issues an upgrade.
When choosing between an integrated and best-of-breed solution, it is also important to decide how to deliver the
technology. Three approaches are:
On-premises. With the on-premises approach, the organization purchases and installs hardware and software on
internal machines, supported by internal IT staff or an IT vendor. It is critical to discuss with IT its ability and
willingness to accommodate and support the technology.
Hosted. In the hosted approach, applications are purchased and installed for the organization, but they are located
at the vendor’s site and supported by external IT staff.
Software as a service. With SaaS, the firm does not purchase or install any software. Instead, the organization
subscribes to software that has been developed for multiple users and that runs on the vendor’s hardware. It is
accessed through the cloud.
Define Performance Objectives

The acquisition will be evaluated against the performance objectives. For example:
What is the targeted budget?
What is the targeted date for launching the technology?
What level of traffic must the technology support?
What capabilities will the technology provide (e.g., types of transactions, navigation parameters [the number of clicks
required to navigate to the desired information, etc.], integration with other technologies, reports, speed of
transactions)?
What are the responsibilities of HR, the organization, and the vendor?
These objectives may be revised before a vendor is selected, based on what is learned during the next phase of the
selection process.
Identify Technology Providers and Assess Offerings

There are a number of ways to research possible providers before contacting vendors:
Do an Internet search and review general articles and vendor websites.
Review analyst reports. Your organization may subscribe to reports from Gartner or similar analysts who publish
thorough background information on product areas and reviews of specific products.
Ask for recommendations from HR colleagues in other organizations.
Contact existing vendors with good records of service to see if they offer a product with the needed features.
Attend HR professional meetings and technology trade shows. There may be presentations about the needed
technology and/or vendor booths.
Once several good options have been identified, HR should have an open and honest discussion about requirements and
restrictions with the vendors. A good vendor wants to understand the customer’s situation clearly. Recommending a
product that will not serve the customer’s needs serves neither the customer nor the vendor.
At this point, the performance criteria for an effective product may have changed. This is fine as long as the changes still
align with the organization’s needs and requirements. Features should not be added without good reason.
Select a Technology Provider

A request for proposal describing HR’s requirements is distributed to several providers. In responding, providers should
conduct demonstrations of the product, with specific references as to how HR will use it.
Providers are selected using the same process used in outsourcing other HR services. Criteria are selected and weighted
by importance, and each provider is scored. The criteria should include more than cost and product features. The
provider’s willingness to provide support, especially during the implementation phase, is critical.
Create a Business Case for Technology Acquisition

If the cost of the technology is significant, HR will in all likelihood need to secure approval from management. This will
require developing a business case to win management agreement for the investment of the organization’s resources. The
organization’s leaders will be primarily interested in how the purchase aligns strategically with the organization’s and HR’s
objectives, what capabilities it is adding, how it affects the organization’s level of risk, and what type of return the
organization will receive for its investment.
Exhibit 47 shows an example involving the acquisition of an applicant tracking system (ATS) to replace an organization’s
manual recruiting system. It compares the current costs for HR to interact with managers for developing job descriptions,
manually filing résumés by position, sending managers schedules and résumés to review, collecting input on managers’
decisions, and tracking candidates from the interview process through making offers and tracking candidates’ acceptance
or rejection. The costs include labor and the annual licensing fee for the ATS product, which also includes training for six
staff members.
Return on investment (ROI) projects the value of an investment compared to the alternative. The formula is as follows:
In this case, the gain is the difference between the costs of operating with and without an ATS, or $312,000. Applying cost
data into the ROI formula, the ROI is 1.15 ($312,000 minus $145,000 divided by $145,000). An ROI above 1 indicates that
the ATS is generally a good investment.
In the second year, the ROI should be greater, because it is expected that only one staff member, at $60,000, will be
needed, thus reducing costs by $48,000 ($40,000 salary plus $8,000 [20% of salary] for fringe benefits). There will still be
an annual licensing fee of $25,000. As noted in the exhibit, the ROI jumps to 2.71 ($360,000 minus $97,000 divided by
$97,000). This again indicates that the ATS is a good investment. One might consider that projecting out for a second year
may not have the same accuracy as predicting costs/ROI for the first year. However, adjustments can be made for
calculating the ROI as new information arises.
Exhibit 47: ROI of Applicant Tracking System Purchase
First-Year Costs Second-Year Costs
Without applicant tracking system
Salaries for six staff members $360,000 Salaries for six staff members $360,000
at $60,000 each at $60,000 each
Benefits (20% of salaries) $72,000 Benefits (20% of salaries) $72,000
Total costs $432,000 Total costs $432,000
With investment in applicant tracking system

Salaries for one staff member $100,000 Salary for one staff member at $60,000
at $60,000 and one staff $60,000
member at $40,000
Benefits (20% of salaries) $20,000 Benefits (20% of salary) $12,000

Software $25,000 Software $25,000
Total costs $145,000 Total costs $97,000
ROI
Gain ($432,000 – $120,000) $312,000 Gain ($432,000 – $72,000) $360,000
Cost of investment ($120,000 + $145,000 Cost of investment ($72,000 + $97,000

$25,000 $25,000)
ROI: ($312,000 – 1.15 ROI: ($360,000 – 2.71
$145,000)/$145,000 $97,000)/$97,000
Implement and Assess New Technology

Depending on the complexity of the technology, it may be implemented through a test in one part of the organization and
then introduced broadly throughout the organization. Testing offers opportunities to correct the product and to strengthen
the training (since common user problems and challenges can be detected during the test). The test may also create an
opportunity to build acceptance of the new technology by a core group of influencers.
The task of introducing new technology involves HR professionals’ change management skills. Initial resistance can be
modified by showing the technology’s benefits and providing sufficient training, support, and time for the HR staff or the
users of the new technology to become confident of their abilities. HR should gather feedback continuously after
implementation and communicate with stakeholders how their feedback will be incorporated.
After an appropriate time, the project should be assessed against the original criteria. This may involve collecting more
accurate and complete data about the costs of the technology during this early period and recalculating savings.
Stakeholder attitudes should also be surveyed. If the purchase involved a continuing relationship with a vendor, that
relationship should be assessed as well. For example, HR professionals might consider the vendor’s fulfillment of
commitments and response to reported problems.
Managing Technology Opportunities and Risks

Develops and implements organizational standards and policies for maintaining confidentiality of employee data.
Uses technologies in a manner that protects workforce data.
Provides guidance to stakeholders on effective standards and policies for the use of technologies in the workplace
(e.g., social media, corporate and personal e-mail, internet messaging).

Policies and practices for technology and social media use (e.g., bring-your-own-device, websites, computers for
personal activity).
Managing Technology Opportunities and Risks
Technology can make work easier and can help HR professionals be more productive and effective, but it also introduces
risks that must be anticipated and controlled. Among these risks is that of noncompliance with new data privacy
regulations. HR professionals can manage the opportunities and risks that technology presents by assisting in developing
and implementing policies and procedures about its use and communicating possible threats and good “digital hygiene” to
all employees.
The corporate office for a wholesale distributor began receiving calls from news agencies and animal rights activists
concerning information on social media about one of the distributor’s employees. It seemed the agencies and animal rights
groups had been made aware of content on social media indicating that the employee had committed an act of animal
cruelty. The animal rights activists were demanding that the employee be immediately terminated.
The issue was a Facebook post that showed an image of a dog being abused. The person posting the image had tagged
the employee in the photo—mistakenly, as it turned out. The image then appeared on the employee’s timeline, and visitors
to the employee’s page accused the employee of being involved in unethical breeding practices. Soon, the accusers
turned on the employee’s employer (identified in his profile), charging that the company was condoning this type of
behavior because the employee had not been immediately fired, without further investigation.
A senior HR manager decided to put the employee on paid leave pending further investigation. The investigation soon
uncovered the mistakes and confirmed that the employee had no connection with the disturbing incident...or in fact any
knowledge of it or the people involved. This was confirmed during an investigation by the local police.
The challenge now was to repair the damage to the organization’s and the employee’s reputation. The HR manager met
with social media consultants to develop a campaign to present the truth.
The HR manager was tempted to listen to public demands and fire the employee immediately. But, as a leader and a
model for ethical behavior, it was important to stay calm, not get drawn into the emotion of the situation, and avoid making
a snap decision. And being knowledgeable about the importance of strategic communication, the manager was able to
take steps to protect both the employee’s and the company’s reputation.
Risks Posed by Technology in the Workplace
The opportunities and risks associated with technology are many and varied, but they can be grouped into three general
categories:
Data and system security. Data collection fuels workplace transactions and improves productivity, service, and
decision making. Because of this, data is among an organization’s most important assets. And, as such, it must be
protected from unauthorized access and use.
Data privacy. Data collection, storage, and use must be transparent and compliant with government guidelines.
Social and ethical implications. The collection of data leads to the question of how the data will be used. The
incorporation of data technology into the workplace introduces the issue of equity.
Data and System Security

Security ranks as a top priority for any HRIS. Data is vulnerable to theft, corruption, and misuse. Systems can be damaged
or manipulated. For example, employee data can be stolen and used to commit fraud (e.g., file false credit applications).
Payroll records can be erased or altered, disrupting work and defrauding the organization. Security access records can be
altered, allowing breaches of the organization’s physical facilities or its information systems. Proprietary information can be
stolen.
The sources of these security threats may be internal or external to the organization. The risk may occur as the result of
deliberate intention, or it may occur unintentionally—the result of carelessness or ignorance.
The organization’s security measures must address:

Exposure of electronically stored sensitive data (e.g., personal or benefits information).
Loss of sensitive personnel data.
Unauthorized updates of key data.
While data security is a complex task that is perpetual and unending, general security protections involve:
Limiting logical and physical access to databases and systems.
Encrypting data that is being transmitted over the Internet or is stored on system servers.
Protecting against hacking and social engineering.
Limiting Logical and Physical Access to Data and Systems

Access to databases and systems can be restricted, for example, with firewalls , which are software and/or hardware
intended to filter incoming and outgoing communication according to preset rules. Access to databases containing
employee data or to the payroll system may be restricted to only certain job classifications or individuals. The system can
create an auditable digital trail of transactions. Computers with access to data and systems can be secured with
passwords or biometric controls (e.g., thumb prints), and employees can be trained to increase their awareness of the
vulnerability created by unlocked computers. Passwords can be strengthened and changed more often.
Encryption
Encryption is the conversion of data into a format that protects or hides its natural presentation or intended meaning.
Encryption software can be used with stored or transmitted data. Software can also alert users when there has been an
effort to decrypt data.
You are probably already familiar with a form of Internet encryption. When a website URL has an “https” prefix (for
Hypertext Transfer Protocol-Secure), it offers a higher level of security by encrypting transmitted data. An icon showing a
padlock indicates that a site is secure.
Managers of HR technology should discuss encryption protection with their IT consultants. Users, especially mobile
computing users, need to be aware of the value of encryption and alert to unsecured sites.
Hacking
Hacking refers to the act of attempting to access data without permission. Once the system has been breached, data can
be stolen, deleted, altered, or corrupted. The entire system can be held for ransom during a ransomware attack. It can be
disabled by flooding an access point with demands for service (a denial-of-service attack). Malware can be inserted that
changes software processes or destroys data.
Access can be obtained by exploiting weaknesses in the system, such as a firewall that has not been updated, or through
the use of surveillance software, which can capture passwords. Social engineering attacks can also capture data that can
be used to access systems. Social engineering , in a computer context, refers to tricking a user into sharing information
—such as passwords, e-mail addresses, or identification numbers—that can then be used to access systems.
Some of the most common social engineering tactics include:
Phishing . E-mails, phone calls, texts, or instant messages that ask for information or ask the user to click an
embedded link. Spear phishing attacks use known data about the user to create the air of legitimacy. For example,
a bogus e-mail may be sent from the address of an executive in one’s own organization. The address may have
been netted by scanning the Internet for publicly available information.
Fake e-cards or job opening information. E-mails pretending that an attachment is an electronic greeting card or
information about a job opening from a friend or some other trustworthy source when the attachment actually
contains a harmful program that could infect your computer.
Phony security alerts. E-mails or pop-up windows claiming to be from a trusted source and warning that your
computer is at risk of being infected or hacked. A link or attachment that is supposed to fix the problem will infect
your computer.
“Click this link” scams. E-mails or social networking sites enticing you to click a link in order to take advantage of a
great offer, see a picture or video, claim an award or reward, and so forth. While the links often look legitimate, they
take you to a harmful website and steal your information or infect your computer.
User education is key to protecting against these threats. Some cybersecurity services provide user training, including
simulated phishing e-mails. If users respond to the fake e-mail, they receive corrective feedback immediately. If they
correctly report the e-mail as a phishing attack, they receive positive feedback.
User training should emphasize the following practices:

Never disclose a password to anyone, even if the source seems legitimate.
Do not give private information to anyone you do not know or who does not have a legitimate need for it (in person,
over the phone, via e-mail or the Internet).
Click links only from trusted sources. Never click a link from a source you are unfamiliar with unless you have a way
to independently verify that it is safe.
Delete unsolicited e-mails; do not open, forward, reply to, or click links or attachments in them.
Assess the request and investigate if it seems unusual. For example, a request from your CEO for employee data
may seem plausible, but if it has never happened before, a phone call should be made to the CEO’s office.
Data Privacy
As the importance of data has grown, so has public uneasiness about the amount of data that is being collected about
individuals and transactions and how it might be used. Reflecting this concern, governments have enacted laws and
regulations regarding the collection, storage, sharing, and use of data.
The European Union (EU) has taken the lead in regulating data privacy. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),
passed in 2016 and implemented in 2018, has become a benchmark against which organizations design and assess their
data practices. This is in part because of its breadth—the GDPR can affect any HR organization that processes employee
data in an EU country even if it is not headquartered in the EU—and because of its significant penalties for noncompliance
—up to 4% of annual turnover (or revenue) or 20 million euros, whichever is higher. The GDPR is also comprehensive in
its treatment of the issue.
Exhibit 48 lists some effects of the GDPR on HR practices. One of the most important practices HR can implement is a
compliance audit of all the processes using employee/applicant data. The audit should also include the preparedness of
HR staff to comply with data privacy regulations.
Exhibit 48: GDPR and HR Practices
GDPR Theme HR Responses
Transparency (how data will be Update privacy notices to employees and applicants that seek
used) explicit permission to use data.
Individual rights of access to Define who owns data (the employee/applicant, the
and control over data organization, the vendor) and who has a business right to use
it.
Ensure that HR can reply promptly to employee requests to
access or correct data.
Legality of processing Remove use of and references to “employee consent to data
use” in handbook and agreements. (These agreements are
not sufficient. Data use must be based in the law.)
Document valid legal grounds for all data processing
activities.
Data quality and minimization Formalize internal and vendor data retention limits.
Develop and implement policies on data collection and
retention.
Data sharing Implement data sharing agreements with internal functions
and outside vendors.
Data transfers Map internal flow of data to identify data that falls within
GDPR rules.
Data breaches (intentional or Implement data security measures.

accidental, through external Develop and implement data breach policies to ensure
hacking or internal actions, reporting of breaches within 72 hours.
such as accidental e-mailing of Review post-employment agreements regarding use of
employee data) organizational data.
Accountability Maintain comprehensive records for authorities.
Conduct an assessment of current practices (e.g., employee
monitoring and background checks).
Implement training and governance systems (internal data
protection officer, audits, disciplinary guidelines).
Social and Ethical Dimensions of Workplace Technology

Equal access to data has been an issue since technology was first introduced in the workplace. Internet access over
mobile devices has expanded digital access, but it can still be an issue for job applicants and remote workers. Recruiting
strategies that rely exclusively on the Internet may be unfair to applicants with housing challenges and without continuous
access to the Internet and e-mail. Self-service employee portals may disadvantage remote workers with slower Internet
connections. Some digital content may not be accessible to employees or applicants with sight or hearing difficulties.
Searches of social media gives prospective employers the ability to uncover more information about job applicants, but is
using this information fair? Is the information complete and accurate? Is it being interpreted without bias? Should the
applicant be given the opportunity to explain evidence used to discredit an application?
Employee records contain extensive historical data. Can the organization ensure that stored data about an employee will
not be used to discriminate against him or her? Will information about health problems or family status interfere with
opportunities for promotion?
A more challenging issue now is the use of artificial intelligence in HR applications. AI may recommend options to
employees or applicants based on an algorithm or mathematical formula based on predictive analytics. On its face, an
algorithm appears completely objective, but algorithms can be based on inaccurate and limited data, intentional bias, or
unintentional or blind bias. For example, employees may see different internal job opportunities depending on their
location or age or background.
Policies on Employees’ Use of Technology

In Smart Policies for Workplace Technologies, Lisa Guerin notes that many organizations do not recognize the need for
workplace technology policies or erroneously think that existing policies address new technologies. She advises that
procrastinating on drafting or updating technology policies puts an organization at risk, exposing organizational assets and
creating the potential for legal issues.
Content in this section examines effective technology workplace policies and approaches in the areas of collaboration,
employees working on their own devices, and social networks.
Managing Collaboration Risks

Many organizations have introduced practices designed to maintain structure while, as much as reasonably possible,
allowing for the natural aspects of human interaction in collaboration to come out. Some of these effective practices
include:
Setting meetings at times that can accommodate the most participants.
Creating meeting agendas with estimates of time allocated to each topic.
Providing the host of a meeting with full control over the technological tools being used.
Using overlapping technologies (groupware, VoIP, a web browser, smartphones, etc.) concurrently to help ensure
multiple means of participant access.
Recording discussions/meetings to allow stakeholders unable to participate in real time to access and review the
outcomes.
Using passcodes to ensure that only invitees are able to gain access and participate.
Including hierarchies of authority access (read/write) to source documents to protect the source’s integrity while
tracking any changes made or proposed.
Including legal disclaimers in all documents/projects that outline the rights and responsibilities of the participants.
Balancing the need for security and rights protection with user-friendly accessibility.
“Bring Your Own Device”

Digital devices have proliferated, and the concepts of the workplace and work hours have become looser in many nations.
It was probably inevitable that employees would want to use their own devices to work and communicate when they are
not in the office. The “bring your own device” (BYOD) practice has become an issue of convenience for employees as well
as employers and, many would argue, an opportunity for increased productivity. In exchange for employees’ using their
own devices, organizations may commit their IT functions to support these myriad devices.
Many organizations have resisted allowing BYOD because of the drain on expensive IT time and because of security
threats that insufficiently protected devices can pose. In addition, there may be legal considerations for the employer
regarding compensating employees for hours worked outside of the workplace and for retrieving and/or protecting
proprietary information retained on employees’ personal devices.
It would be naive, however, to assume that employees are obeying prohibitions against BYOD completely. Many IT
experts believe that organizations will benefit from developing realistic BYOD policies that allow employees to use their
personal digital devices to access the organization’s network but define certain restrictions on the use of personal devices.
A BYOD policy might:
Restrict the use of personal devices while the employee is working in the workplace during the employee’s work
hours. This is aimed at limiting loss of productivity (from checking personal e-mail and social sites), limiting the
employer’s liability (e.g., if the employee uses the device for illegal or unethical purposes, such as texting while
driving or viewing pornography), and protecting the employer’s assets and the privacy of other employees (e.g., from
unrestricted use of the device’s web cam). The policy should illustrate permitted and non-permitted uses.
State which devices will be supported by IT and the requirements for using the device (e.g., IT approval and
configuring of all applications that access the network, review and confirmation of adequate security tools).
Clarify financial arrangements (e.g., reimbursement for using a personal mobile device) and legal rights (e.g., the
right to wipe or erase a device without liability for the employee’s personal data).
Define security measures—for example, requiring adequate password protection, prohibiting downloading
applications without IT approval, prohibiting accessing the virtual private network with a personal device.
HR must add to its organizational exit checklist the need to remove access ability from the exiting employee’s devices. HR
should also work with the organization’s legal counsel to ensure that the policy and practices do not violate any state or
local laws, such as those related to password privacy.
Workplace Use of Social Networks

Social networks generally refer to the online clustering of individuals in groups with common or shared interests. Social
networking services (SNSs) or social networking sites connect individuals with similar interests regardless of their
geographic locations. The sites allow users to create profiles and interact with others in a variety of ways (such as the
exchange of private or public messages). A variety of tools may be embedded in social network sites, including e-mail,
blogs, instant messages, text, podcasts, photographs, and videos.
Numerous experts have suggested that the use of the word “social” in social media is unfortunate as it discounts the
business and other more practical, value-added uses of the technology. For example, organizations review comments on
social networks by customers and employees to understand the perspectives of these important stakeholders. HR
professionals may make use of social networks to advertise their organization’s job opportunities and to create employer
brands. They may use professional networks to remain current with HR trends and ideas and to exchange best practices
with other HR professionals. They may use social networks located on the organization’s own information system to create
project teams or groups of learners. Networks improve communication and collaboration.
While social networks create opportunities, they also create risks for the organization and for individual employees. The
organization risks damage to its reputation when employees post damaging remarks about the organization or its
customers or when they disclose proprietary information. There is also the issue of the organization’s responsibility to
protect its employees from the actions and speech of other employees—for example, from an employee disparaging or
intimidating another employee or from an employee disclosing another employee’s private information.
The risks posed by information posted on social networks have led some employers to commit acts that could violate
individuals’ privacy. In 2013, for example, some employers (particularly in the United States) began asking job candidates
to supply their social media passwords so that the employer could review their online profiles. This triggered a global
discussion about the legality and ethics of such practices. Since that time many jurisdictions have introduced laws
protecting candidates and employees from being forced to provide such information.
A better solution is to develop a thorough and well-understood social network policy that applies to both employer and
employees.
Developing Social Network Policies

Policies and practices related to the use of social networks can help to provide a balance between a congenial workplace
where talent is prized and one that protects the organization’s proprietary information, security, and legal interests and the
privacy and well-being of other employees.
Employment law expert Lisa Guerin advises HR professionals who want to develop policies on social networks to:
Identify key risks. For example, patient privacy may be a key risk for a health-care provider.
Review the organization’s employee handbook for related policies and practices and to determine if they are working
and whether employees have to sign an acknowledgment.
Discuss risks and concerns with the organization’s IT function or consultant.
Consult with the organization’s legal counsel on key compliance issues.
Align the proposed policy with the organization’s culture and its stated values. An overly restrictive policy can
damage the organization’s relationship with its employees.
Develop written policies and secure thorough review and commitment from leaders. Policies could include:
Prohibitions about the use of the organization’s resources (technology and time) and the organization’s right to
monitor. For example, the organization may reserve the right to monitor all technology use and
communications made, accessed, sent, or received on the organization’s equipment, from office-based
hardware to employer-provided devices (such as cell phones and mobile computing devices).
Prohibitions from posting or disclosing any confidential, proprietary, or intellectual property information.
Situations requiring employer approval for postings regarding the employer’s facilities, products, or services.
Rules about personal endorsement of the organization’s products or services.
Rules for personal posts about colleagues (e.g., zero tolerance of sexual harassment, cyberbullying, or
threats).
Statement that employees will be held accountable for any violation of laws and policies (including anonymous
postings).
Communicate the policies and require acknowledgment signatures for them.
Enforce the policies consistently, for both employees and management.
Keep the policies up-to-date and revise as necessary.
Key Content
Situations can and do arise that require an organization to read or monitor employee e-mails, Internet browsing histories,
blogs, and so forth. The best strategy here is to tell employees ahead of time that their communications may be read or
tracked. Notifying employees about potential monitoring may serve as a deterrent for inappropriate communications.
Employees’ legal right to communication privacy is partially determined by how much privacy they expect to have. If an
organization tells employees that their communications are not private, it may be problematic for them to contest
confidentiality.
Enforcing the social network use policy will be made easier if the organization has assigned monitoring duties to a specific
individual, a social media content reviewer. This individual can scan the site continuously and remove offensive or
proprietary content promptly and can also direct interesting comments or ideas to the appropriate people in the
organization.
Bibliography
Accenture. “Digital Radically Disrupts HR.” www.accenture.com/t20150708T060458__ w__/id-
en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Strategy_6/Accenture-Future-of-HR-Digital-
Radically-Disrupts.pdf.
Accenture. “From Looking Digital to Being Digital: The Impact of Technology on the Future of Work.”
www.accenture.com/t20150523T023643Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-
Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Dualpub_11/Accenture-Impact-of-Technology-April-2014.pdf.
Accenture. “Information 2015: Reforming the Paradigm.” www.criticaleye.com/inspiring/insights-servfile.cfm?id=2122.
Accenture. “Traits of Truly Agile Businesses.” 2014, www.accenture.com/t20150523t042402__w__/lu-

en/_acnmedia/accenture/conversion-assets/dotcom/documents/global/pdf/industries_15/accenture-traits-truly-agile-businesses-
infographic.pdf.
Adams, Roy J. “Should Works Councils Be Used as Industrial Relations Policy?” Monthly Labor Review, July 1985,
www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1985/07/art4full.pdf.
Adler, Nancy J., and Allison Gundersen. International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: Thomson
South-Western, 2008.
American Society for Quality. ASQ’s Foundations in Quality: Certified Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence. Milwaukee,
Wisconsin: American Society for Quality, 2005.
Anderson, Donald L. Organization Development: The Process for Leading Organizational Change, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE
Publications, 2015.
Ashford, Susan, Ruth Blatt, and Don VandeWalle. “Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking
Behavior in Organizations.” Journal of Management, 29 (6), 2003.
Baker and McKenzie. “Worldwide Guide to Trade Unions and Works Councils.” 2009, adapt.it/adapt-indice-a-z/wp-
content/uploads/2013/09/global_tradeunions_guide_2009.pdf.
Barley, Stephen R. The New World of Work. London: British-North American Research Committee, 1996.
Barrow, Peta-Anne, Jean-Baptiste Martin, and Betsy Plevan. “International Workplace Dispute Practices: Key Concepts for Today’s
Global Employers.” Proskauer, December 5, 2012, www.internationallaborlaw.com/2012/12/05/international-workplace-dispute-
practices-key-concepts-for-todays-global-employers/.
Bartlett, Christopher A., and Sumantra Ghoshal. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, 2nd ed. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press, 2002.
Becker, Brian E., Mark A. Huselid, and Richard W. Beatty. The Differentiated Workforce. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2009.
Beckhard, Richard, and Reuben T. Harris. Organizational Transitions, 2nd ed. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1987.
Bedell, Michael D., Michael Canniff, and Cheryl Wyrick. “Systems Considerations in the Design of an HRIS: Planning for
Implementation.” In Human Resource Information Systems: Basics, Applications, and Future Direction, M. J. Kavanagh and M.
Thite, eds. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 2009.
Beemer, Jeffrey M. “Top 10 Mistakes to Avoid with Employee Handbooks.” November 13, 2015.
www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/Pages/employee-handbook-mistakes.aspx.
Benne, Kenneth D., and Paul Sheats. “Functional Roles of Group Members.” Social Issues, Spring 1948.
Berger, Lance A., and Dorothy R. Berger, eds. The Talent Management Handbook, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
Bintliff-Ritchie, Joanne. “Realizing the Full Potential of Workforce Analytics.” 2011, phillyshrm.org/wp-
content/uploads/2015/01/RealizingPotential_Whitepaper_FINAL.pdf.
BLR—Business and Legal Resources, www.blr.com.
Boudreau, John W. Retooling HR: Using Proven Business Tools to Make Better Decisions about Talent. Boston: Harvard Business
Review Press, 2010.
Boudreau, John W., and Ravin Jesuthasan. Transformative HR: How Great Companies Use Evidence-Based Change for
Sustainable Advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2011.
Boudreau, John W., and Peter M. Ramstad. Beyond HR: The New Science of Human Capital. Boston: Harvard Business School
Press, 2007.
Boudreau, John, and Peter Ramstad. “Talentship and the New Paradigm for Human Resource Management.” Human Resource
Planning, June 2005.
Briscoe, Dennis R., Randall S. Schuler, and Lisbeth Claus. International Human Resource Management, 3rd ed. New York:
Routledge, 2008.
Briscoe, Dennis R., Randall S. Schuler, and Ibraiz Tarique. International Human Resource Management, 4th ed. New York:
Routledge, 2012.
Brown, Mark Graham. Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class Performance. Portland, Oregon: Quality
Resources, 1996.
Browne, M. Neil, and Stuart M. Keeley. Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:
Prentice Hall, 1997.
Bruce, Stephen. “Align HR Metrics and Company Strategy.” HR Daily Advisor, May 20, 2014,
hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2014/05/20/align-hr-metrics-and-company-strategy/#.
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. “Artificial Intelligence, for Real.” Harvard Business Review, July 2017.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (U.S.), www.bls.gov.
Capelli, Peter. “Why We Love to Hate HR…and What HR Can Do About It.” Harvard Business Review, July-August 2015.
Cascio, Wayne F., and John Boudreau. Investing in People: Financial Impact of Human Resource Initiatives. Upper Saddle River,
New Jersey: FT Press, 2008.
Cheung-Judge, Mee-Yan, and Linda Holbeche. Organization Development: A Practitioner’s Guide for OD and HR. London:
KoganPage, 2011.
Collins, James, and Jerry Porras. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: Harper Business, 2004.
Davenport, Thomas H. “Analytics 3.0.” Harvard Business Review, December 2013.
Davenport, Thomas H. Big Data at Work: Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities. Boston: Harvard Business Review
Press, 2014.
Delong, David W. Lost Knowledge: Confronting the Threat of an Aging Workforce. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Demos, Telis. “Citi: Technology Could Cost Two Million Bank Employees Their Jobs.” The Wall Street Journal, March 30, 2016.
Dessler, Gary. Human Resource Management, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1997.
“Developments in Industrial Action 2005–2009.” European Federation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions,
www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn1004049s/tn1004049s.htm.
Dowling, Donald C., Jr. “Overseas Independent Contractor or de Facto Foreign Employee?” www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?
g=bfdad9f7-e648-48d2-b799-44cda63a77fc.
Dowling, Peter J., Marion Festing, and Allen D. Engle, Sr. International Human Resource Management, 5th ed. Andover, United
Kingdom: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2008.
“Effective Ways of Handling Employee Grievance.” April 12, 2017, www.cleverism.com/handling-employee-grievance/.
Ellingwood, Justin. “An Introduction to Big Data Concepts and Terminology.” September 28, 2016,
www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/an-introduction-to-big-data-concepts-and-terminology.
“Employer’s Parent and UAW Lawfully Drove Organizing at Tennessee Volkswagen Plant: NLRB General Counsel’s Office.”
Practical Law, February 5, 2014. us.practicallaw.com/1-555-9025?q=&qp=&qo=&qe.
“e-Procurement Golden Book of Good Practice—Final Report.” PwC, 2013,

ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/15443/attachments/1/translations.
European Federation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. “Works Councils: Workplace Representation and
Participation Structures.” www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/2005/works-councils-workplace-representation-and-participation-
structures.
Eurostat (European Union), ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
Evans, Paul, Vladimir Pucik, and Ingmar Björkman. The Global Challenge: International Human Resource Management, 2nd ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
Faragher, Jo. “Why HR Needs Good Negotiation Skills, and How You Can Build Them.” Personnel Today, February 2012,
www.personneltoday.com/hr/why-hr-needs-good-negotiation-skills-and-how-you-can-build-them/.
Fitz-enz, Jac, and Barbara Davison. How to Measure Human Resources Management, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
Fried, Yitzhak, and Gerald R. Ferris. “The Validity of the Job Characteristics Model: A Review and Meta-Analysis.” Personnel
Psychology, 40, 1987.
Galbraith, Jay R. Designing Organizations, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2014.
Gartner. “Predicts 2014: Cloud Computing Affects All Aspects of IT.” 2013, www.gartner.com/doc/2631851/predicts--cloud-
computing-affects.
Gelfand, Michele J., Miriam Erez, and Zeynep Aycan. “Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior.” Annual Review of Psychology,
2007.
Georgopoulos, Basil S., Gerald M. Mahoney, and Nyle W. Jones, Jr. “A Path-Goal Approach to Productivity.” Journal of Applied
Psychology, 41, 1957.
Giehll, Tim, and Sara Moss. Human Capital Supply Chains. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Mill City Press, 2009.
Goldratt, Eliyahu M., and Jeff Cox. The Goal. Great Barrington, Massachusetts: North River Press, 2004.
Greenhouse, Steven. “U.A.W. Drops Appeal of VW Vote in Tennessee.” New York Times, April 21, 2014,
www.nytimes.com/2014/04/22/business/auto-workers-union-drops-appeal-in-vw-vote.html?_r=0.
Greiner, Larry E. “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow.” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1998.
Grossman, Robert J. “Saving Shared Services.” HR Magazine, September 2010.
Guerin, Lisa. Smart Policies for Workplace Technologies. Berkeley, California: NOLO, 2013.
Gundling, Ernie. “Cross-Border Change Management: Implications for Organization Development.” 2009,
www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/organizational-and-employee-
development/Pages/CrossBorderChangeManagement.aspx.
Gurchiek, Kathy. “Culture Officers Protect, Maintain Essence of Company.” HR News, 2013, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-
topics/organizational-and-employee-development/Pages/Corporate-Culture-Officers.aspx.
Gurchiek, Kathy. “Some Jobs Going Way of Dodo Bird.” HR News, 2014, www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-news/Pages/some-jobs-
disappearing-going-way-of-dodo-bird.aspx.
Hackman, J. Richard, and Edward E. Lawler. “Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 55,
1971.
Hackman, J. Richard, and Greg R. Oldham. Work Redesign. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
Hall, Kevan. Making the Matrix Work. London: Nicholas Brealey, 2013.
Harris, Jeanne G., Elizabeth Craig, and David A. Light. “The New Generation of Human Capital Analytics.” Accenture, 2010.
Harris, Jim, and Joan Brannick. Finding and Keeping Great Employees. New York: AMACOM, 1999.
Hassell, Jonathan. “7 Tips for Establishing a Successful BYOD Policy.” CIO, May 17, 2012,
www.cio.com/article/2395944/consumer-technology/7-tips-for-establishing-a-successful-byod-policy.html.
Heskett, James L., and John P. Kotter. Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press, 1992.
Humphrey, Stephen E., Jennifer D. Nahrgang, and Frederick P. Morgeson. “Integrating Social and Motivational Models of Work
Design: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature.” Paper presented at the annual
conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, Texas, 2006.
International Labour Organization, www.ilo.org.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). “ISO/TC 260 Human Resource Management.”
www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/list_of_iso_technical_ committees/iso_technical_committee.htm? commid=628737.
International Project Management Association (IPMA), www.ipma-usa.org/.
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). “The World in 2014: ICT Facts and Figures.” 2014, www.itu.int/en/ITU-
D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2014-e.pdf.
iSixSigma, www.isixsigma.com.
Jaruzelski, Barry, Kevin Schwartz, and Volker Staack. “Innovation’s New World Order.” strategy + business, Winter 2015.
www.strategy-business.com/feature/00370?gko=e606a.
.Jaruzelski, Barry, Robert Chwalik, and Brad Goehle. “The Global Innovation 1000 Study.”
www.strategyand.pwc.com/gx/en/insights/innovation1000.html
Jaruzelski, Barry, Volker Staack, and Brad Goehle. “The Global Innovation 1000: Proven Paths to Innovation Success.” strategy +
business, Winter 2014. www.strategy-business.com/article/00295?gko=8a0a5.
Jectić, Milan. “The Role of Works Councils and Trade Unions in Representing Interests of the Employees in EU Member States
(Partnership or Competition).” Friedrich Ebert Foundation, March 2012.
Jobvite, www.jobvite.com.
Johnson, Richard D., and Hal G. Gueutal. “Transforming HR Through Technology: The Use of E-HR and HRIS in Organizations.”
www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-reports-and-expert-views/Documents/HR-Technology.pdf.
Kaufman, Bruce E. “The Theoretical Foundation of Industrial Relations and Its Implications.” ILR Review, 64:1, September 30,
2010.
Konrad, Alison M. “Engaging Employees through High-Involvement Work Practices.” The Workplace, March/April 2006,
iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/engaging-employees-through-high-involvement-work-practices/.
Kulkarni, Gaanyesh. “Organizational Restructuring.” PowerPoint presentation, 2013.
Lawler, Edward E., III. High Involvement Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
Lawler, Edward E., III, and John W. Boudreau. “Creating an Effective Human Capital Strategy.” August 1, 2012, www.shrm.org/hr-
today/news/hr-magazine/Pages/0812boudreau.aspx.
Lawler, Edward E., III, and John W. Boudreau. Effective Human Resource Management: A Global Analysis. Stanford, California:
Stanford University Press, 2012.
“Learning How to Influence.” Human Resources Director, March 2008.
Levenson, Alec. “The Promise of Big Data for HR.” HR People and Strategy, Volume 36, Issue 6, 2014.
Li, Ying, Cécile Martin, Reginald Meisburg, Daniel Ornstein, and Betsy Plevan. “Resolving Workplace Disputes Around the World.”
Proskauer, April 7, 2011, www.internationallaborlaw.com/files/2012/10/Resolving-Workplace-Disputes.pdf.
Medina, Francisco J., Lourdes Munduate, Miguel A. Dorado, Ines Martinez, and Jose M. Guerra. “Types of Intragroup Conflict and
Affective Reactions.” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20 (3/4), 2005.
Meister, Jeanne C., and Karie Willyerd. The 2020 Workplace—How Innovative Companies Attract, Develop, and Keep Tomorrow’s
Employees. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2010.
Mintern, Tom, and Sam Rayner. “8 Aspects of GDPR Compliance: A Brief Guide for HR Functions.” March 30, 2018,
www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/global-gdpr-hr.aspx.
Morgeson, Frederick P., and Stephen E. Humphrey. “The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a
Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006.
NAVEX Global. “Definitive Guide to Policy and Procedure Management.” www.navexglobal.com/en-us/resources/definitive-

guides/definitive-guide-policy-and-procedure-management?RCAsset Number=152.
Organizational and Leadership Agility Survey. Institute for Corporate Productivity, 2010, www.i4cp.com.
Parker, Sharon K. “A Broaden-and-Build Model of Work Design: How Job Enrichment Broadens Thought-Action Repertoires Via
Positive Affect.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas,
Texas, 2006.
Parker, Sharon K., Helen M. Williams, and Nick Turner. “Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work.” Journal of
Applied Psychology, 91, 2006.
PC Magazine, www.pcmag.com.
Pennington, Randy G. “Management Tools: Four Ways to Lead Change.” www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/Pages/0914-

leading-change.aspx.
“Phishing Activity Trends Report: 1st–3rd Quarters, 2015.” docs.apwg.org/reports/apwg_trends_report_q1-q3_2015.pdf.
Project Management Institute, www.pmi.org.
PwC, www.pwc.com.
Rampton, John. “Wearables in the Workplace: The Next Big Thing?” Forbes, June 18, 2015.
www.forbes.com/sites/johnrampton/2015/06/18/wearables-in-the-workplace-the-next-big-thing/#237d28ea78be.
Robbins, Stephen P., and Timothy A. Judge. Organizational Behavior, 15th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2012.
Roberts, Bill. “Cover Story: The Benefits of Big Data.” October 2013, www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/Pages/1013-big-
data.aspx.
Roberts, Bill. “Negotiating a Tech Contract: The Devil Is in the Details.” May 2014, www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-
magazine/Pages/0614-technology-contracts.aspx.
Rotella, Joe. “Technology Meets HR: Selecting and Justifying the Right Solution.” Presentation at SHRM 2016 Annual Conference
and Exposition.
Samdahl, Erik. “Agile Leaders Generate Greater Corporate Performance.” March 11, 2010, www.i4cp.com/productivity-
blog/2010/03/11/agile-leaders-generate-greater-corporate-performance.
Schiff, Jennifer Lonoff. “6 Biggest Business Security Risks and How You Can Fight Back.” CIO, January 20, 2015.
www.cio.com/article/2872517/data-breach/6-biggest-business-security-risks-and-how-you-can-fight-back.html.
Society for Human Resource Management. The SHRM Body of Competency and Knowledge. Alexandria, Virginia: Society for
Human Resource Management, 2017.
Society for Human Resource Management. SHRM Learning System for GPHR Certification Preparation. Alexandria, Virginia:
Society for Human Resource Management, 2014.
Society for Human Resource Management. SHRM Learning System for HRMP Certification Preparation. Alexandria, Virginia:
Society for Human Resource Management. SHRM Learning System for PHR/SPHR Certification Preparation. Alexandria, Virginia:
Society for Human Resource Management, www.shrm.org.
“Bylaws and Code of Ethics.” www.shrm.org/about-shrm/pages/bylaws--code-of-ethics.aspx.

“Conducting Human Resource Audits.” 2016, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/Pages/humanresourceaudits.aspx.
“Designing and Managing a Human Resource Information System.” 2015, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/pages/managingahumanresourceinformationsystem.aspx.
“Developing Employees.” www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/pages/developingemployees.aspx.
“Engaging in Succession Planning.” 2015, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/Pages/engaginginsuccessionplanning.aspx.
“Future Insights.” 2014, www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/labor-market-and-economic-
data/pages/toptrendsfor2014.aspx.
“How to Conduct an Investigation.” 2018, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-samples/how-to-
guides/Pages/howtoconductaninvestigation.aspx.
“How to Select an HRIS.” 2015, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-samples/how-to-
guides/Pages/howtoselectanhrissystem.aspx.
“HR Forms.” www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-samples/hr-forms/Pages/default.aspx.
“Introduction to the Human Resources Discipline of Organizational and Employee Development.” 2015,
www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/pages/introorganizationalandemployeedevelopment.aspx.
“Leveraging the Value of Employee Self-Service Portals.” 2015, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/pages/leveraging-value-of-employee-self-service-portals.aspx.
“Managing and Leveraging Workplace Use of Social Media.” 2016, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/Pages/managingsocialmedia.aspx.
“Metrics: How Do I Determine Which HR Metrics to Measure and Report?” 2018, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-
samples/hr-qa/Pages/metricsmosthelpful.aspx.
“Outsourcing the HR Function.” 2015, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/Pages/outsourcingthehrfunction.aspx.
“Practicing the Discipline of Workforce Planning.” 2015, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/pages/practicingworkforceplanning.aspx.
“Reduction in Force Policy: Voluntary Separation Program.” 2014, www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-
samples/policies/Pages/cms_000640.aspx.
Stewart, Thomas A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Currency Doubleday. 1997.
Sullivan, John. HR Metrics the World-Class Way: How to Build the Business Case for Human Resources. Peterborough, New
Hampshire: Kennedy Information, 2003.
Sumser, John. “What Are the 20 Most Important Types of HR Technology?” January 30, 2017,
resources.careerbuilder.com/recruiting-solutions/best-hr-technology.
TechTerms.com, www.techterms.com.
Towers Watson. “2014 HR Service Delivery and Technology Survey.”
Treacy, Michael, and Fred Wiersema. The Discipline of Market Leaders. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.
Trompenaars, Fons, and Maarten Nijhoff Asser. The Global M & A Tango: Cross-Cultural Dimensions of Mergers and Acquisitions.
Oxford: Infinite Ideas Limited, 2010.
Ulrich, Dave, and Wayne Brockbank. The HR Value Proposition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005.
Ulrich, Dave, et al. “The Six Competencies to Inspire HR Professionals for 2012.” HR Magazine, January 2012,
www.hrmagazine.co.uk/hr/features/1020649/exclusive-the-competencies-inspire-hr-professionals-2012.
United Nations Statistics Division, unstats.un.org.
U.S. Census Bureau, census.gov.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. “Performance Management.” www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-

management/performance-management-cycle/planning/developing-performance-standards/.
“Using Human Capital Analytics to Make Excellent Business Decisions.” HR People and Strategy, Volume 34, Issue 2, 2011.
Vaill, Peter. Learning as a Way of Being: Strategies for Survival in a World of Permanent White Water. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass, 1996.
Vance, Robert J. “Employee Engagement and Commitment: A Guide to Understanding, Measuring and Increasing Engagement in
Your Organization.” SHRM Foundation, 2006.
Waddill, Deborah D., and Michael J. Marquardt. The e-HR Advantage. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2011.
Watson Wyatt. “Changing Strategies in HR Technology and Outsourcing—2007 HR Technology Trends Survey.” 2008.
Wilkie, Dana. “Right and Wrong Ways to Terminate.” September 12, 2013, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-
relations/pages/right-wrong-ways-to-terminate.aspx.
Willamette University. “Global Human Resource Management in Action—Instructional Vignettes.” www.willamette.edu.
“Works Councils and Unions: Friend or Foe of HRO?” HRO Today, January/February 2006, www.hrotoday.com/?
s=works%20councils%20and%20unions%20friend%20or%20foe%20hro.
World Trade Organization. “Labour Standards: Consensus, Coherence and Controversy.”

www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/bey5_e.htm.
Wright, Aliah D. “5 Trends Changing the Nature of Work.” 2013, www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-news/pages/5-trends-changing-

the-nature-of-work.aspx.
Wright, Aliah D. “HR Urged to Prepare for New Data Protection Law in Europe.” 2017, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-
topics/global-hr/pages/hr-urged-to-prepare-for-new-data-protection-law-in-europe.aspx.
Wright, Aliah D. “Successful Mergers Integrate Cultures.” 2010, www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-

news/Pages/successfulmergersintegratecultures.aspx.
Zielinski, Dave. “HR Technology: Making the Most of Manager Self-Service.” 2013, www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-
magazine/pages/1213-manager-self-service.aspx.
Glossary
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Umbrella term for the various approaches and techniques, other than litigation, that can be used to resolve a dispute.
Arbitration
Method of dispute resolution by which disputing parties agree to be bound by the decision of one or more impartial
persons to whom they submit their dispute for final determination.
Center of excellence (COE)

An organizational structure that leverages staff expertise in certain areas to improve the entire organization’s strategic
performance.
Artificial intelligence (AI)

Ability of a computer to imitate human thought and behavior.
Chain of command
Line of authority within an organization.
Cloud computing
Style of computing in which scalable IT-enabled capabilities are delivered as a service using Internet technologies.
Codetermination
Form of corporate governance that requires a typical management board and a supervisory board and that allows
management and employees to participate in strategic decision making.
Co-employment
Situation in which an organization shares responsibility and liability for their alternative workers with an alternative
staffing supplier; also known as joint employment.
Collective bargaining
Process by which management and union representatives negotiate the employment conditions for a particular
bargaining unit for a designated period of time
Conciliation
Method of nonbinding dispute resolution by which a neutral third party tries to help disputing parties reach a mutually
agreeable decision; also called mediation
Constructive discipline
Form of corrective discipline that implements increasingly severe penalties for employees.
Cosourcing
Arrangement in which an enterprise and a vendor share different tasks within a larger complex, often strategic
responsibility.
Dedicated HR
HR structural alternative that allows organizations with different strategies in multiple units to apply HR expertise to each
unit’s specific strategic needs.
Departmentalization
Way an organization groups jobs to coordinate work.
Downsizing
Termination of employment of individual employees or groups of employees for reasons other than performance, for
example, economic necessity or restructuring; also known as reduction in force (RIF).
Due diligence
Process of investigating a decision thoroughly before finalizing it to identify all potential factors that could affect the
positive and negative impacts of the decision.
Employment at-will
Principle of employment in the U.S. that employers have the right to hire, fire, demote, and promote whomever they
choose for any reason unless there is a law or contract to the contrary and that employees have the right to quit a job at
any time.
Encryption
Conversion of data into a format that protects or hides its natural presentation or intended meaning.
Enterprise resource planning (ERP)

Business management software, usually a suite of integrated applications, that a company can use to collect, store,
manage and interpret data from many business activities.
Firewalls
Software and/or hardware that filters incoming and outgoing communication according to preset rules.
Formalization
Refers to the extent to which rules, policies, and procedures govern the behavior of employees in an organization.
Functional HR
HR structural alternative in which headquarters HR specialists craft policies and HR generalists located within divisions
or other locales implement the policies, adapt them as needed, and interact with employees.
Functional structure
Organizational structure in which departments are defined by the services they contribute to the organization’s overall
mission, such as marketing and sales, operations, and HR.
Geographic structure
Organizational structure in which geographic regions define the organizational chart.
Grievance procedure
Orderly way to resolve differences of opinion.
Hacking
Act of deliberately accessing computer data without permission.
HR audit
Systematic and comprehensive evaluation of an organization’s HR policies, practices, procedures, and strategies.
Human resource information system (HRIS)

Information technology framework and tools for gathering, storing, maintaining, retrieving, revising, and reporting HR
data.
Independent contractors
Self-employed individuals hired on a contract basis for specialized services.
Industrial actions
Various forms of collective employee actions taken to protest work conditions or employer actions.
Information system (IS)

Way to collect, organize, store, analyze, and share data.
Intellectual property (IP)

Ownership of innovation by an individual or business enterprise; includes patented, trademarked, or copyrighted
property.
Joint employment
Situation in which an organization shares responsibility and liability for their alternative workers with an alternative
staffing supplier; also known as co-employment.
Judgmental forecasts
Use of information from past and present to predict future conditions.
Knowledge management (KM)

Process of creating, acquiring, sharing, and managing knowledge to augment individual and organizational
performance.
Labor union
Group of workers who coordinate their activities to achieve common goals in their relationship with an employer or
group of employers; also called trade union.
Line units
Work groups that conduct the major business of an organization.
Lockout
Action of an employer to shut down operations to prevent employees from working.
Matrix structure
Organizational structure that combines departmentalization by division and function to gain the benefits of both; results
in some employees reporting to two managers rather than one, with neither manager assuming a superior role.
Mediation
Method of nonbinding dispute resolution by which a neutral third party tries to help disputing parties reach a mutually
agreeable decision; also called conciliation.
Non-compete agreement (NCA)

Common form of post-employment agreement that prevents employee from leaving to work for one of employer’s
competitors.
Non-disclosure agreement (NDA)

Common form of post-employment agreement, especially in knowledge industries, in which employee agrees not to
discuss knowledge gained during employment.
Organizational development
Process of enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of an organization and the well-being of its members through
planned interventions.
Outsourcing
Process by which an organization contracts with third-party vendors to provide selected services/activities instead of
hiring new employees.
Picketing
Positioning of employees at a place of work targeted for the action for the purpose of protest.
Policy
Broad statement that reflects an organization’s philosophy, objectives, or standards concerning a particular set of
management or employee activities.
Product structure
Organizational structure in which functional departments are grouped under major product divisions.
Project labor agreement (PLA)

Agreement that requires specific contractors to accept certain conditions in project contracts, such as paying a fair wage
and contributing to health insurance, pension, and training funds.
Reduction in force (RIF)

Termination of employment of individual employees or groups of employees for reasons other than performance, for
example, economic necessity or restructuring; also known as downsizing.
Regression analysis
Statistical method used to predict a variable from one or more predictor variables.
Replacement planning
“Snapshot” assessment of the availability of qualified backup for key positions.
Restructuring
Act of reorganizing the legal, ownership, operational, or other structures of an organization.
Secondary action
Attempt by a union to influence an employer by putting pressure on another employer, for example, a supplier.
Service-level agreement (SLA)

Part of a service contract where the service expectations are formally defined.
Shared services HR model

HR structural alternative in which centers with specific areas of expertise develop HR policies in those areas; each unit
can then select what it needs from a menu of these services.
Simulations
Representations of real situations; give organizations the opportunity to speculate as to what would happen if certain
courses of action were pursued.
Sit-down strike
Refusal by workers to work; also refusal by workers to leave their workstations, making it impossible for the employer to
use replacement workers.
Social engineering
In a computer context, tricking a user into sharing information that can then be used to access systems.
Social networks
Online clustering of individuals in groups with common or shared interests.
Software as a service (SaaS)

Software that is owned, delivered, and managed remotely and delivered over the Internet to contracted customers on a
pay-for-use basis or as a subscription based on use metrics.
Span of control
Refers to the number of individuals who report to a supervisor.
Staff units
Work groups that assist line units by providing specialized services, such as HR.
Succession planning
Process of implementing a talent management strategy for identifying and fostering the development of high-potential
employees or other job candidates who, over time, may move into leadership positions of increased responsibility.
Sympathy strike
Action taken in support of another union that is striking the employer.
Talent management
Development and integration of HR processes that attract, develop, engage, and retain the knowledge, skills, and
abilities of employees that will meet current and future organizational needs.
Trade union
Group of workers who coordinate their activities to achieve common goals in their relationship with an employer or
group of employers; also called labor union.
Turnover
Act of replacing employees leaving an organization; attrition or loss of employees.
Turnover rate
Annualized formula that tracks number of separations and total number of workforce employees per month.
Unfair labor practice (ULP)
Violation of employee rights; act prohibited under labor relations statutes.
Whistleblowing
Reporting of an organization’s violations of policies and processes by employees.
Wildcat strike
Work stoppages at union contract operations that have not been sanctioned by the union.
Workforce analysis
Systematic approach to anticipate human capital needs and data HR professionals can use to ensure that appropriate
knowledge, skills, or abilities will be available when needed to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Workforce management
All activities needed to ensure that workforce size and competencies meet the organization’s strategic needs.
Workforce planning
Activities needed to ensure that workforce size and competencies meet current and future organizational and individual
needs.
Works councils
Groups that represent employees, generally on a local or organizational level, for the primary purpose of receiving from
employers and conveying to employees information about the workforce and the health of the enterprise.
Work-to-rule
Situation in which workers slow processes by performing tasks exactly to specifications or according to job or task
descriptions.
Index
A
absence rate [1]
access, limiting [1]
accounting/finance [1] , [2]
accruals [1]
acquired rights laws [1]
acquisition [1]
administrative human resources role [1]
ADR (alternative dispute resolution) [1]
AI (artificial intelligence) [1] , [2]
alternative dispute resolution [1]
alternative staffing [1]
applicant tracking systems [1]
applicant yield ratio [1]
application software [1]
arbitration [1] , [2]
artificial intelligence [1] , [2]
ATS (applicant tracking systems) [1]
at-will employment [1]
audits, human resources [1]
authority [1]
B
balanced scorecard [1]
bargaining topics [1]
best practices audits [1]
big data [1]
boards of directors [1] , [2]
BOB (“best of breed”) HRIS solutions [1]
boycotts [1]
budgets [1]
business case for technology acquisition [1]
business tier [1]
BYOD (bring your own device) [1]
C
career management [1]
CBA (collective bargaining agreement) [1]
centers of excellence [1]
centralized human resources structure [1]
chain of command [1]
chosen officer in alternative dispute resolution [1]
cloud computing [1] , [2]
codetermination [1]
co-employment [1]
COEs (centers of excellence) [1]
collaboration [1]
collective bargaining
agreement [1]
contract negotiation [1]
human resources role in [1]
communications tier [1]
community groups, relation to labor unions [1]
compliance audits [1]
conciliation [1]
conflict resolution [1]
constructive discipline [1]
contractors
independent [1]
third-party [1]
contracts
administration/enforcement of [1]
employment [1]
grievance procedures [1]
negotiation of [1] , [2]
contract workers [1]
core capabilities [1]
core organizational functions [1]
cosourcing [1]
cost per hire [1]
covenant of good faith and fair dealing exemption to employment at-will [1]
culture
and conflict management [1]
organizational, interventions for [1]
customer structure [1]
D
data
privacy [1]
security [1]
tier [1]
decentralized human resources structure [1]
decision-making authority [1] , [2]
dedicated human resources structure [1]
demand analysis [1] , [2]
departmentalization [1]
discharge [1]
discipline of employees [1]
dispute resolution [1]
divestiture [1]
downsizing [1]
due diligence [1]
due process [1]
dysfunctional roles in groups [1]
E
EAW (employment at-will) [1]
employee complaints, investigation of [1]
employee discipline [1]
employee engagement/retention [1]
employee handbooks [1]
employee leasing [1]
employee relations
global [1]
role of managers/supervisors [1]
strategies [1]
employee self-service technologies [1]
employer associations, relation to labor unions [1]
employer rights [1]
employment at-will [1]
employment contracts [1]
employment relationship [1] , [2]
encryption [1]
enterprise resource planning [1]
ERP (enterprise resource planning) [1]
ESS (employee self-service) technologies [1]
ethical/social implications of technology [1]
executive management [1] , [2]
expansion [1]
extended organizations [1]
F
finance/accounting [1] , [2]
finite temporary help [1]
firewalls [1]
flexible staffing [1]
flow analysis [1]
forecasts in workforce analysis [1] , [2] , [3]
formalization [1]
forming stage in teams [1]
functional human resources structure [1]
functional organizational structure [1]
function-specific audits [1]
G
gap analysis [1] , [2]
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation, European Union) [1]
General Data Protection Regulation (European Union) [1]
generalists, human resources [1]
general strikes [1]
geographic structure [1]
global labor strategies [1]
governments
relation to labor unions [1]
role in employee/union complaints [1]
grievances [1]
group dynamics [1]
H
hacking [1]
handbooks, employee [1]
hierarchy, layers of [1]
HR.
See: under human resources
HRIS (human resource information systems) [1]
human capital return on investment [1]
human capital value added [1]
human resource information systems [1]
human resources, and works councils [1]
human resources, centralized [1]
human resources, decentralized [1]
human resources, dedicated [1]
human resources, functional [1]
human resources audits [1]
human resources business partners [1]
human resources metrics [1]
human resources performance, evaluation of [1]
human resources role
administrative [1]
in contract negotiations [1]
in employee discipline [1]
in flexible staffing [1]
in industrial actions [1]
in litigation [1]
in organizational effectiveness/development [1]
in policies/procedures [1]
in unfair labor practices [1]
in workforce management [1]
operational [1]
strategic [1]
human resources service culture [1]
human resources strategy [1]
human resources structure [1] , [2]
human resources team [1]
human resources technology [1] , [2]
human resources value, demonstrating [1]
I
ILO (International Labour Organization) labor standards [1]
implied contract exemptions to employment at-will [1]
incentive systems [1]
independent contractors [1]
industrial actions [1]
industry associations, relation to labor unions [1]
information systems [1]
information technology function [1] , [2] , [3]
integration of technology [1]
intellectual property [1]
international groups, relation to labor unions [1]
international labor standards [1]
International Labour Organization labor standards [1]
investigations of employee complaints [1]
IP (intellectual property) [1]
IS (information systems) [1]
IT (information technology) function [1] , [2] , [3]
J
job sharing [1]
joint employment [1]
judgmental forecasts [1]
K
kay talent pools [1]
key performance indicators [1]
key talent retention [1]
KM (knowledge management) [1] , [2]
knowledge gaps [1]
knowledge management [1] , [2]
knowledge transfer [1]
KPIs (key performance indicators) [1]
L
labor relations [1]
See also: labor unions
labor standards [1]
labor unions
characteristics [1]
global [1]
membership [1]
strategies in response to [1]
types [1]
layers of hierarchy [1]
leaders in human resources team [1]
learning [1]
line units [1]
logic tier [1]
M
managed services [1]
manager self-service technologies [1]
managers in human resources team [1]
marketing and sales [1] , [2]
matrix structure [1]
McKinsey 7-S Framework [1]
mechanistic organizations [1]
mediation [1] , [2]
merger/acquisition [1]
metrics [1]
MSS (manager self-service) technologies [1]
multiple linear regression [1]
N
NCAs (non-compete agreements) [1]
NDAs (non-disclosure agreements) [1]
needs analysis/assessment
for technology purchases [1]
in outsourcing [1]
negotiation of contracts [1] , [2]
networks, social [1]
NGOs (nongovernmental organizations), relation to labor unions [1]
non-compete agreements [1]
non-disclosure agreements [1]
nongovernmental organizations, relation to labor unions [1]
norming stage in teams [1]
O
objectives, tactical [1]
OD.
See: organizational effectiveness/development
OED.
See: organizational effectiveness/development
ombudsperson [1]
on-call workers [1]
open-door policy in alternative dispute resolution [1]
operational human resources role [1]
operations function [1] , [2]
organic organizations [1]
organizational culture interventions [1]
organizational design
departmentalization [1]
roles and responsibilities [1] , [2]
structural characteristics [1]
organizational effectiveness/development
assessment of [1]
failure of [1]
human resources role [1]
interventions [1]
organizational interventions [1]
proactive [1]
remedial [1]
team interventions [1]
unit interventions [1]
organizational interventions [1]
organizational strategy [1]
organizational structure [1]
See also: organizational design
organizational theories [1]
outsourcing [1] , [2]
P
part-time employees [1]
payback period [1]
payrolling [1]
peer review [1]
PEOs (professional employer organizations) [1]
performance, building [1]
performance management [1]
performance measures for human resources [1]
performance objectives for technology acquisition [1]
performing stage in teams [1]
phased retirement [1]
phishing [1]
picketing [1]
pivotal talent pools [1]
policies
technology [1]
workplace [1]
post-employment agreements [1]
presentation tier [1]
privacy, data [1]
proactive organizational effectiveness/development interventions [1]
problem-solving session in constructive discipline process [1]
process interventions [1]
product structure [1]
professional employer organizations [1]
promotion pattern [1]
public policy exemptions to employment at-will [1]
R
R&D (research and development) [1] , [2]
RACI matrixes [1]
redistribution of decision-making authority [1]
reductions in force [1]
regression analysis [1]
religious institutions, relation to labor unions [1]
remedial organizational effectiveness/development interventions [1]
replacement planning [1]
requests for proposals [1]
requirements in technology acquisition [1]
research and development [1] , [2]
restructuring [1]
retaliation in workplace [1]
retirement, phased [1]
return on investment [1] , [2]
RFPs (requests for proposals) [1]
RIFs (reductions in force) [1]
ROI (return on investment) [1]
roles/responsibilities in organizational structure [1]
S
SaaS (software as a service) [1] , [2]
sales and marketing [1] , [2]
scalability of technology [1]
seasonal workers [1]
secondary actions [1]
security of information technology systems [1] , [2]
self-service technologies [1]
service-level agreements [1]
shared services human resources model [1]
simple linear regression [1]
simulations [1]
single designated officer in alternative dispute resolution [1]
sit-down strikes [1]
skill gaps [1]
SLAs (service-level agreements) [1]
social/ethical implications of technology [1]
social engineering [1]
social networks [1]
social roles in groups [1]
software applications for human resources [1]
software as a service [1] , [2]
solution analysis [1] , [2]
span of control [1]
specialists, human resources [1]
specialization [1]
staffing
alternative [1]
flexible [1]
plan [1]
staff units [1]
stakeholders
in staffing plan [1]
internal [1]
standards, labor [1]
statistical forecasts [1]
storming stage in teams [1]
strategic audits [1]
strategic human resources role [1]
strategy
human resources [1]
organizational [1]
strikes [1]
succession planning [1]
success ratio [1]
supply analysis [1] , [2]
sympathy strikes [1]
system software [1]
T
tactical objectives [1]
talent acquisition [1]
talent management [1]
talent pools [1]
task roles in groups [1]
teams
building [1]
formation [1]
interventions [1]
technology
acquiring [1] , [2]
applications [1]
assessment of [1]
big data [1] , [2]
ethical implications [1]
implementation of [1]
in human resources [1] , [2]
integration [1]
interventions [1]
policies [1]
providers [1]
risks [1]
scalability [1]
security [1]
social implications [1]
temporary assignments [1]
temporary employees [1]
temp-to-hire programs [1]
temp-to-lease programs [1]
termination [1]
third-party conflict resolution [1]
third-party contractors [1]
trade unions.
See: labor unions
training [1]
training return on investment [1]
transactional time, reduction of [1]
transfer [1]
turnover
analysis [1]
costs [1]
rate [1] , [2]
U
ULPs (unfair labor practices) [1]
unfair labor practices [1]
union density [1]
union penetration [1]
unions.
See: labor unions
unit interventions [1]
V
vacancy costs [1]
value of human resources [1]
verbal counseling session in constructive discipline process [1]
W
warnings in constructive discipline process [1]
whistleblowing [1]
wildcat strikes [1]
workforce analysis
demand analysis [1] , [2]
gap analysis [1] , [2]
solution analysis [1] , [2]
supply analysis [1] , [2]
workforce management
flexible staffing [1]
restructuring [1]
staffing plan [1]
succession planning [1]
talent management [1]
workforce planning [1]
workforce planning [1]
See also: workforce analysis
workplace retaliation [1]
works councils [1]
work specialization [1]
work-to-rule [1]

Untitled

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Untitled

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Untitled

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

License

Subject matter experts

Ed Hasan, EdD, MBA, SHRM-SCP, SPHR

Past subject matter experts

Todd Brodie, PhD., SHRM-SCP, CHRP, FCIPD

Paul Chiames, SPHR

Joanne Lee, SHRM-SCP

Partika Raj Malhotra, B.A., Psychology; Postgraduate, Human Resources; SHRM-SCP

Tom O’Connor, JD, GPHR, SHRM-SCP, SPHRi

Robert Robinson, SCP, SPHR, GPHR, Chartered Member CIPD

David S. Twitchell, SHRM-SCP, CCP, CBP, PHR

Christine V. Walters, MAS, JD, SHRM-SCP, SPHR

Nina E. Woodard, SPHR, GPHR

Alejandro Zeballos, GPHR, PMP

Travis Teare, Esq.

Proficiency indicators for advanced HR professionals include:

Approaches to HR function/service models (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized).

Approaches to HR structural models (e.g., Center of Excellence [COE], shared services).

Elements of the HR function (e.g., recruiting, talent management, compensation, benefits).

Proficiency indicators related to this section include:

Key concepts related to this section include:

HR’s strategic role includes:

Aligning the HR strategy with the organization’s strategy. For example:

Supporting other functions in their strategic roles. For example:

This strategic role shapes HR’s administrative and operational roles.

Developing an HR Service Culture

Proficiency indicators related to this section include:

Exhibit 2: Cross-Functional Relationships with HR

Cross-Functional Relationships with HR

Executive Recruiting executive candidates in highly Recruiting and training

Promoting a climate that values innovation Ensuring security of patents

Operations Developing staffing plans Ensuring physical security of

Dealing with intellectual property rights Coordinating with local legal,

How HR Interacts with Executive Management

Finance and Accounting Functions

How HR Interacts with Finance and Accounting

Marketing strategies are often characterized as “push” or “pull”:

How HR Supports Marketing and Sales

Research and Development Function

How HR Supports R&D

How HR Supports Operations

Information Technology Function

IT faces a number of major challenges.

How HR Works with IT

Proficiency indicators related to this section include:

Key concepts related to this section include:

Exhibit 3: Advantages and Disadvantages of HR Structural Alternatives

Structure Overview Advantages/Disadvantages

For example, HROs can administer or implement:

The Outsourcing Process

Analyze Needs and Define Goals.

The questionnaire includes such questions as:

Define the Budget.

Create a Request for Proposal.

Send RFPs to Chosen Contractors.

Exhibit 4: Factors to Consider When Evaluating Third-Party Contractors

Evaluating a Third-Party Contractor

Scope of resources Company reputation/references

Implement the Project and Monitor the Schedule.

Evaluate the Project.