Building Intrinsically Secure Control and Safety Systems

Using ANSI/ISA-99 Security Standards for Improved Security and Reliability

Eric Byres, Chief Technology Officer, Byres Security Inc.

The Sinking of the Titanic

On the night of 14 April 1912, Titanic struck an iceberg and sank two hours and forty minutes later. One of the contributing factors was that the bulkheads on Titanic did not make compartments fully watertight. Water from the damaged compartments was able to flood into the undamaged ones, sinking the ship.

Zotob Worm Security Incident

August 18, 2005: 13 US auto plants were shut down by a simple Internet worm. Despite professionally installed firewalls between the
Internet, the company network and the control network, the Zotob worm had made its way into the control system (probability via a laptop). Once in the control system, it was able to travel from plant to plant in seconds.

50,000 assembly line workers to cease work during

the outages. Estimated $14 million loss.

The Browns Ferry Security Incident

August 19, 2006: Operators at Browns Ferry Nuclear plant had to scram the reactor due to a potentially dangerous high power, low flow condition. The facility remained offline for 2 days. Redundant drives controlling the recirculating water system

failed due to excessive traffic" on the control systems network. Traffic between two different vendors control products was likely the cause.

The Hatch Nuclear Security Incident

March 7, 2008: Unit 2 of the Hatch nuclear plant forced into an emergency shutdown for 48 hrs. An engineer installed a software update on a computer

operating on the plant's business network. The computer was used to monitor diagnostic data with a PC on one of the primary control networks. The software update was designed to synchronize data on both systems. When the updated business computer rebooted, it reset the data on the control system computer. Safety systems interpreted the lack of data as a drop in water reservoirs that cool the plant's nuclear fuel rods, and triggered a shutdown.

Lodz Tram System Security Incident

January 8, 2008 Teenage boy hacks into the track control system of the Lodz city tram system, derailing four vehicles. He had adapted a television remote control so it could
change track switches.

Notice that the Internet is not involved

What does the Titanic and these Control System Events have in Common?

Poor design or deployment of the system

A lack of separation between key sub-systems A misunderstanding of the threat sources and the resultant risk.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commissions View

The August 19, 2006, Browns Ferry transient unnecessarily challenged the plant safety systems and placed the plant in a potentially unstable highpower, low-flow condition. Careful design and control of the network architecture can mitigate the risks to plant networks from malfunctioning devices, and improper network performance, and ultimately result in safer plant operations.
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE: 2007-15

What Makes a System Unsafe and Unreliable?

A failure to contain communications in appropriate areas or sub-systems. Issues in one area can migrate to another area due to poor (or non-existent) separation strategy. Not Unusual The North American Electrical Reliability Council (NERC) lists their #2 vulnerability in control systems as:
Inadequately designed control system networks that lack sufficient defense-in-depth mechanisms

The solution is the use of security zones.

Addressing Flawed Design: Using ANSI/ISA-99 Standards

Understand Zones and Conduits Security Levels

ANSI/ISA-99: Dividing Up The Control System

A core concept in the new ANSI/ISA-99 security standard is Zones and Conduits Offers a level of segmentation and traffic control inside the control system. Control networks divided into layers or zones based on control function. Multiple separated zones help to provide defense in depth.

ANSI/ISA-99: Connecting the Zones

Connections between the zones are called conduits, and these must have security controls to: Control access to zones Resist Denial of Service (DoS) attacks or the transfer of

It is important to understand and manage all your conduits between zones, not just the obvious ones.

malware Shield other network systems Protect the integrity and confidentiality of network traffic

Security Zone Definition

Security zone: grouping of logical or physical assets that share common security requirements. [ANSI/ISA-99.01.012007- 3.2.116] A zone has a clearly defined border (either logical or
physical), which is the boundary between included and excluded elements.

HMI Zone Controller Zone

Conduits

A conduit is a path for the flow of data between two zones. can provide the security functions that allow different zones

to communicate securely. Any communications between zone must have a conduit.

Conduit
HMI Zone Controller Zone

Security Levels

A zone will require a Security Level Target (SLT) based on factors such as criticality and consequence. Equipment in a zone will have a Security Level Capability (SLC). If they are not equal you need to add security technology and/or policy to make them equal.

Security Targets vs. Capabilities

Example: The security level capabilities (SLC) of a zone full of Windows XP-based HMIs is typically greater than: a zone of Windows NT servers a zone with PLCs BUT they may have the same SLT. Securing the whole control system to the level needed by PLCs and NT Servers can be expensive: Complex process edge VPNs and firewalls Wholesale replacement Firewalls for each device

Saving Money with Zones and Conduits

Solution: Separate the PLCs and NT servers into their own zones and focus on securing each zone with a conduit.

HMI Zone
SLC = 2 SLT = 2

PLC Zone
SLC = 1 SLT = 2

Conduit increases SL by 1

Addressing Flawed Configurations

Oops I forgot that dash

A Few Incorrectly Configured Firewalls

Study of 37 firewalls from financial, energy, telecommunications, media, automotive, and security firms...
Almost 80 percent of firewalls allow both the "Any" service on inbound rules and insecure access to the firewalls. These are gross mistakes by any account.
A quantitative study of firewall configuration errors Avishai Wool, " IEEE Computer Magazine, IEEE Computer Society, June 2004

A Few Incorrectly Configured Firewalls

Only 5 out of 37 Good Firewalls?

The Firewalls are just fine but

Commands for creating firewall rules are too complex. For example:
acl 201 permit tcp any eq 80 10.20.30.0 0.0.0.255 gt 1023 established (Cisco PIX) $IPT -A PCN_DMZ -p tcp --dport ! $DH_PORT -j LOG_PCN_DMZ (Linux iptables)

This leads to security mistakes

More Firewall Rules

Even an ACL for a simple home router is complex:

22

Requirements in the Controls World

"Certainly controls engineers and operators need to be security aware, but they should not all need to be security experts." "The only way this is going to happen is if we rework IT security technologies and concepts into something that makes sense to our world of industrial control." "We have to make this [security] something a plant superintendent, engineer, or senior operator can do in their spare time, or it will flop."
ISA-S99 Discussion Forum

Solution: Making Field Deployment Simple

Zero Configuration Field Deployment Model Field technician should do no more than: Attach the firewall to the DIN Rail Attach instrument power Plug in network cables Walk away Firewall should be completely transparent to the process network on startup.

Solution: Control Engineer Friendly

When needed, rule creation must be intuitive

List of devices that can talk to a protected device and allowed protocols

Case History: Creating Intrinsically a Secure Safety System

Using Zones: A Refinery Example

Specifying the Zones

Adding the Conduits

The Need for a Protected SIS Zone

Risk analysis indicated that there was the potential for common-mode network failures to migrate between the DCS and the Safety Integrated System The solution was to: Separate a safety zone from the process control system

zone. Define an approved conduit between the two zones. Use a Tofino Modbus-TCP Enforcer industrial firewall between the two zones to enforce inter-zone traffic controls.

The Protected SIS Zone Architecture

Configuration Specifics - Redundancy

Two Tofino Firewalls were connected between the Triconex terminal servers and the Level 2 Ethernet switches, providing redundant connections between the safety system and the control system. The fact that the firewalls offered bridging mode rather than traditional routing simplified this configuration greatly.

Tofino Security Appliance

Hardware specifications: Temperature -40C to 70C Dual Power Supply Zone 2 Form factor similar to common I/O or barriers

Dual Digital Inputs

Ethernet Ports

Secure USB Ports DIN Rail Mount Dual 932 VDC

Simplifying Multiple Device Rule Sets

Grouping of similar devices into networks simplified rule creation for common rule management.

Managing Multicast Nuisance Traffic

Tofino Test mode indicated that Windows multicast traffic created a significant amount of nuisance traffic on the safety networks. Messages like these were a significant factor in the Browns Ferry incident. Needed to be silently dropped from the network.

Managing Multicasts Nuisance Alarms

Tofinos Assisted Rule Generation (ARG) feature proposed a block rule to drop these messages.

Summary

Internet-based hackers are the tip of the iceberg of security concerns for industry. Easy to focus on stories of hackers and terrorists and miss the real risks posed by lax security design and policy. Security is maintaining the reliability and safety of control systems (not just keeping hackers out). Separation of a process system into zones improves security AND reduces costs. Security of safety systems can be significantly improved at little cost with industrial firewalls.