Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Diseño de Puente Tipo Losa: Ariel Mauricio Diaz

    Uploaded by

    Ariel Mauricio Diaz
    This document discusses the design of a bridge with a hollow core slab section. It defines the geometry of the slab including its total depth, the diameter and spacing of the hollow cores. It then calculates the moments due to the self-weight of the slab, track loading from a HL-93 truck, and other loads to size the main reinforcement. Finally it specifies the reinforcement with bar sizes and spacing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Diseño de Puente Tipo Losa: Ariel Mauricio Diaz

    Uploaded by

    Ariel Mauricio Diaz
    23 views7 pages
    This document discusses the design of a bridge with a hollow core slab section. It defines the geometry of the slab including its total depth, the diameter and spacing of the hollow cores. It then calculates the moments due to the self-weight of the slab, track loading from a HL-93 truck, and other loads to size the main reinforcement. Finally it specifies the reinforcement with bar sizes and spacing.

    Original Title

    Untitled

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses the design of a bridge with a hollow core slab section. It defines the geometry of the slab including its total depth, the diameter and spacing of the hollow cores. It then calculates the moments due to the self-weight of the slab, track loading from a HL-93 truck, and other loads to size the main reinforcement. Finally it specifies the reinforcement with bar sizes and spacing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    23 views7 pages

    Diseño de Puente Tipo Losa: Ariel Mauricio Diaz

    Uploaded by

    Ariel Mauricio Diaz
    This document discusses the design of a bridge with a hollow core slab section. It defines the geometry of the slab including its total depth, the diameter and spacing of the hollow cores. It then calculates the moments due to the self-weight of the slab, track loading from a HL-93 truck, and other loads to size the main reinforcement. Finally it specifies the reinforcement with bar sizes and spacing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 7

    DISEÑO DE PUENTE TIPO

    LOSA
    ARIEL MAURICIO DIAZ
    Hallar la armadura principal (cm2/m) para un puente tipo losa alveolar con la siguiente sección transversal

    Definir el canto total de la losa, el diámetro de los alveolos y su separación:


    El puente lleva una carpeta de pavimento de 5 cm - camión de diseño HL-93

    L ≔ 10.5 m S ≔ 10.5 m
    f´c ≔ 28 MPa
    fy ≔ 420 MPa
    Armadura principal paralela al tráfico
    De acuerdo con la instrucción del
    cliente, carga viva a utilizar es HL-93.
    Pre dimensionamiento

    1.2 ⋅ (S + 3 m
    t≔ = 0.54 m
    ta ≔ 0.6 m30 Dalv ≔ 0.25 m
    π
    Aalv ≔ ⋅ Dalv2 = 0.049 m 2
    4
    ⎛⎝7.2 m - Dalv ⋅ 18⎞⎠
    Sep ≔ = 0.159 m
    17
    lbf tonnef
    Wc ≔ 145 = 2.323
    ft3 m3
    tonnef
    wlosa ≔ ⎛⎝ta ⋅ 1 m - 2 ⋅ Aalv⎞⎠ ⋅ Wc = 1.166
    m
    2
    wlosa ⋅ L
    Mlosa ≔ = 16.063 tonnef ⋅ m
    8
    Análisis de sobrecarga viva

    Wp ≔ 8 m ancho físico entre los bordes del puente

    L1 ≔ min (L , 18 m = 10.5 m

    W1m ≔ min (7.2 m , 18 m = 7.2 m

    W1s ≔ min (7.2 m , 9 m = 7.2 m


    N L≔floor ⎛⎜ Wp ⎟⎞= 2
    3.6 m
    ⎝ ⎠

    E1 ≔ 0.25 m + 0.42 ⋅ L1 ⋅ W1s = 3.902 m


    Wp
    E2 ≔ 2.1 m + 0.12 ⋅ L1 ⋅ W1m = 3.143 m menor igual que =4m
    NL
    E ≔ min ⎛⎝E1 , E2⎞⎠ = 3.143 m
    CAMION HL-93

    P1 ≔ 8 kip = 3.629 tonnef


    P2 ≔ 32 kip = 14.515 tonnef
    P3 ≔ 32 kip = 14.515 tonnef
    d1 ≔ 14 ft = 4.267 m
    d2 ≔ 30 ft = 9.144 m

    ⎛ L ⎞2 dt ≔ 6 ft = 1.829 m
    ⎜ ⎟
    ⎝2⎠
    LI ≔ = 2.625 m
    L
    y1 ≔ 0.136 m

    y2 ≔ 2.2695 m

    y3 ≔ 0.847 m
    Mtrack ≔ P1 ⋅ y1 + P2 ⋅ y2 + P3 ⋅ y3 = 45.729 tonnef ⋅ m

    CARGA DE CARRIL
    tonnef
    wL ≔ 0.952
    m
    wL ⋅ L2
    Mlave ≔ = 13.12 tonnef ⋅ m
    8
    CARGA DE PAVIMENTO
    kgf tonnef
    wpav ≔ 0.05 m ⋅ 1 m ⋅ 1800 = 0.09
    m3 m
    wpav ⋅ L2
    Mpav ≔ = 1.24 tonnef ⋅ m
    8
    MLLIM ≔ 1.33 ⋅ Mtrack + Mlave = 73.94 tonnef ⋅ m
    MLLIM m
    MLLIMm ≔ = 23.522 tonnef ⋅
    E m
    Definimos: nD ≔ 1 nR ≔ 1 nI ≔ 1 n ≔ nD ⋅ nR ⋅ nI = 1
    Resistencia 1

    MU ≔ n ⋅ ⎛⎝1.25 ⋅ Mlosa + 1.25 ⋅ Mpav + 1.75 ⋅ MLLIMm ⋅ 1 m⎞⎠ = 62.793 tonnef ⋅ m

    Servicio 1
    Mserv ≔ n ⋅ ⎛⎝1 ⋅ Mlosa + 1 ⋅ Mpav + 1 ⋅ MLLIMm ⋅ 1 m⎞⎠ = 40.826 tonnef ⋅ m
    ANCHO DE FRANJA DE BORDE LONGITUDINALES DE LOSA

    E = 3.143 m
    E
    Eborde ≔ 40 cm + 12 in + = 1.491 m
    4
    if ⎛E
    ⎜ borde ≤ E , “ok” , 1.80 m ⎟⎞= “ok”
    ⎝ 2 ⎠
    Calculo del momento por peso de new jersey
    tonnef
    wNJ ≔ 0.224 m 2 ⋅ Wc = 0.52
    m
    wNJ ⋅ L2
    MNJ ≔ = 7.17 tonnef ⋅ m
    8
    Calculo del momento por sobrecarga o carga viva
    D1 ≔ Eborde - 0.40 m - 0.30 m = 0.791 m
    ⎛ 0.30 m + D1 ⎞⎞
    ⎛ 0.5 ⋅ M ⋅ 1.33 + M ⋅
    ⎜ lave ⎜ ⎟⎟
    ⎝ track
    ⎝ 3 m ⎠⎠ m
    MLL_IMBorde ≔ = 23.6 tonnef ⋅
    Eborde m

    Definimos: nD ≔ 1 nR ≔ 1 nI ≔ 1 n ≔ nD ⋅ nR ⋅ nI = 1
    Resistencia 1

    MUext ≔ n ⋅ ⎛⎝1.25 ⋅ Mlosa + 1.25 ⋅ Mpav + 1.25 ⋅ MNJ + 1.75 ⋅ MLL_IMBorde ⋅ 1 m⎞⎠

    MUext = 71.892 tonnef ⋅ m


    Servicio 1
    Mserv ≔ n ⋅ ⎛⎝1 ⋅ Mlosa + 1 ⋅ Mpav + 1 ⋅ MNJ + 1 ⋅ MLL_IMBorde ⋅ 1 m⎠⎞ = 48.074 tonnef ⋅ m

    Fatiga

    "para fatiga el impacto se considera un incremento de 15%"

    Mfat ≔ 1.15 ⋅((y1 + 0.71 m ⋅ P1 + 2.625 m ⋅ P2 = 47.347 tonnef ⋅ m

    Diseño estructural
    MUext =71.892 tonnef ⋅m
    Plano

    cuantía

    GRAFICA

    5/8 20
    Ø " @ cm. 5/8 30
    Ø " @ cm.

    1 15
    Ø " @ cm.

    You might also like