The Case of Brazil
The Case of Brazil
The Case of Brazil
Student’s Manual
Session VI
At the 59th session of the CHR (2003), the Brazilian delegation introduced a “Proposal for a Resolution on
Human Rights and Sexual Orientation”. In fact, it recognises the rights of the human being in regards to
their sexual orientation, because it is considered that human rights and fundamental freedom were the
right when people born. The resolution also call upon all States to promote and protect the human rights
of all persons regardless of their sexual orientation. For several years, Brazil has been trying to include
language on sexual orientation and human rights in the context of the UN. For example, in 2000, 2002 and
2003, the CHR debated including language on sexuality in the resolution on Extra-judicial, arbitrary and
summary executions. Finally, after heated debate, the resolutions were approved with the language on
sexual orientation and the rights of sexual minorities intact. It is a resolution, proposing a point in principle
without calling on governments to take any specific action.
The Vatican, Zimbabwe, Pakistan (leading the Organization of Islamic Conference or OIC), Malaysia,
Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain strongly opposed the resolution. Japan and the European Union, along with
many Latin American and Central and Eastern European countries were the supporters of the resolution.
Pakistan, issued an aide mémoire on the resolution, which called for OIC and other states to vote against
the resolution. The text of the aide mémoire was ‘very hostile’. In addition, states that opposed the
resolution try to apply some delaying tactics and procedural “tricks” to prevent debate from happening.
Ultimately, the opposition to the resolution forced whole conference to vote on the resolution, one of
which was a vote on “no action”.
Instructions
In groups of 4-5, discussion the scenario and how would the chairman reply when Pakistan introduced the
no action motion. How would you gather support for your action? How do you think the conference would
react to your response?
The Commission is one of the central UN forums for discussing human rights: it hears reports from
independent experts, many of whom are increasingly seeking out information and reporting on sexuality-
related discrimination and violence), testimony is given by NGOs, deals are negotiated, normsetting -
resolutions are passed, key human rights issues are vetted. The Commission also sets out priority areas
for the UN’s work on human rights. When new treaties are proposed or new declarations are drafted, the
work often begins at the Commission.
Unlike UN World Conferences or ad hoc meetings on a particular topic, the UNCHR meets every year and
thus it allows for slow, well-planned work. The work of the Commission is administered by the UN Office of
the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). The OHCHR provides support for much of the UN’s
human rights work. A regionally representative group of CHR Member states comprises the "Bureau." The
Bureau acts as a steering committee for the Commission session.