Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 65 views

    Debate Score Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Hafs Nas
    This document contains a score sheet for a debate held at the Political Science Summit SOX 2023. It lists the teams, speakers, and scoring criteria used to evaluate the debate. The scoring is based on the matter, manner, and method of each speaker's arguments, with matter accounting for 40% of the score, manner for 40%, and method for 20%. The winning team and speaker range from 67-83 are also included to provide guidance on scoring speeches.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Debate Score Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Hafs Nas
    65 views2 pages
    This document contains a score sheet for a debate held at the Political Science Summit SOX 2023. It lists the teams, speakers, and scoring criteria used to evaluate the debate. The scoring is based on the matter, manner, and method of each speaker's arguments, with matter accounting for 40% of the score, manner for 40%, and method for 20%. The winning team and speaker range from 67-83 are also included to provide guidance on scoring speeches.

    Original Title

    DEBATE SCORE SHEET

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a score sheet for a debate held at the Political Science Summit SOX 2023. It lists the teams, speakers, and scoring criteria used to evaluate the debate. The scoring is based on the matter, manner, and method of each speaker's arguments, with matter accounting for 40% of the score, manner for 40%, and method for 20%. The winning team and speaker range from 67-83 are also included to provide guidance on scoring speeches.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    65 views2 pages

    Debate Score Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Hafs Nas
    This document contains a score sheet for a debate held at the Political Science Summit SOX 2023. It lists the teams, speakers, and scoring criteria used to evaluate the debate. The scoring is based on the matter, manner, and method of each speaker's arguments, with matter accounting for 40% of the score, manner for 40%, and method for 20%. The winning team and speaker range from 67-83 are also included to provide guidance on scoring speeches.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    POLITICAL SCIENCE SUMMIT SOX 2023

    DEBATE
    Score Sheet

    Round: Room: Date:


    Adjudicator: ( ) Chair
    Motion:

    Government Team:
    Matter Manner Method Total
    (40%) (40%) (20%)
    Prime Minister
    Deputy Prime Minister
    Government Whip
    Government Reply

    Opposition Team:
    Matter Manner Method Total
    (40%) (40%) (20%)
    Leader of the Opposition
    Deputy Leader of the
    Opposition
    Opposition Whip
    Opposition Reply

    Winning Team: ( ) Government ( ) Opposition Team


    Name:

    SPEAKER RANGE
    67 Did not speak.
    68 - 70 Barely any substantive material; arguments were severely underdeveloped; little to no
    responses and engagement; forwarded case was irrelevant and unsubstantiated.
    71 - 73 Arguments are present but lacked substantiation (analysis, grounding. importance); attempts to
    respond were made but missed important points or misrepresented the opponent's case. Lapses
    in logic and generally dismissive, although arguments forwarded were slightly relevant.

    74 - 76 (75) Sufficient arguments were provided and explained to be adequately compelling,


    contributions were substantiated with proper grounding and proof of Importance. Important
    points of the other side were responded to and compared. Case is generally logical and sound
    -Any point minus 75 means the speaker is LESS persuasive (less substantiation, less
    responsiveness, less relevant material).
    -Any point plus 75 means the speaker is MORE persuasive

    77 - 79 Arguments were well rigorously substantiated and highly comparative responses encompassed
    most points of the opposing side, deconstructing and exposing the flaws of the argument; highly
    dynamic and very engaging: case and speech was relevant to the debate.

    80 - 82 Majority of the speech was relevant to the debate, the responses were highly damaging to the
    other teams, and important in forwarding their own case: arguments were thoroughly
    explained, grounded and demonstrated; extremely dynamic in the debate

    83 Argued perfectly, leaving no room for disproving their case, destroyed all arguments of the
    opposing side; extremely dynamic.

    Signatures:

    Adjudicator: Assigned Event Tabulator: Assigned Event Officer/s:


    POLITICAL SCIENCE SUMMIT SOX 2023

    You might also like