Comparative Analysis On Energy Storage Policies at Home and Abroad and Its Enlightenment
Comparative Analysis On Energy Storage Policies at Home and Abroad and Its Enlightenment
Comparative Analysis On Energy Storage Policies at Home and Abroad and Its Enlightenment
at Home and Abroad and Its Enlightenment - Special issue on applied neurodynamics:
from neural dynamics to neural
engineering
Hillel J Chiel and Peter J Thomas
To cite this article: Yanwei Xiao et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 267 032019
- Meeting report
Yanwei Xiao1, Yijing Gao2, Sheng Kuang2, Ke Sun1, Liqiang Yang1, Jiansheng
Hu3, Beibei Wang2
1
State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Company, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 310007, China
2
Southeast University, Jiangsu, Nanjing, 210096, China
3
State Grid XJ Group Corporation, Henan, Xuchang, 461000, China
Email adress: [email protected]
Abstract. In this paper, current development of energy storage(ES) in China and the United
States is introduced firstly. Then, the typical ES policies of China and the United States are
enumerated from the perspectives of general policies and multi-angle policies, which is
consists of the generation side, the grid side and the user side. Through the analysis of the
policies, the paper expounds the promoting effect of various ES policies on its development
and makes a comparison of ES policies in China and the United States. Finally, according to
the policies mentioned in this paper, combined with the current national conditions in China,
the enlightenment and suggestions on policy formulation of ES are given due to the current
national conditions in China.
1. Introduction
As the development of technology, the proportion of renewable resources in power generation is
gradually increasing. As the mainstream trend of energy development in the future, for one thing,
renewable energy has advantages of clean and low cost, for another thing, its characteristic of
fluctuation has a certain impact on the stability of power grid. Energy storage(ES) technology, as a
bidirectional energy flow carrier, provides a new idea for better absorption of renewable energy.
Taking the distributed photovoltaic generator for an example, there is a time difference between the
peak of photovoltaic power generation and the peak of power consumption. Through ES technology,
electricity generated by solar energy can be stored before the day and sent to the grid, so as to ease the
load peak in the evening. At present, ES has been regarded as an important measure to assist the
integration of renewable energy. In order to promote the application of ES, countries have formulated
corresponding policies and measures in accordance with the existing development situation.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
IWRED 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 267 (2019) 032019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/267/3/032019
3.1General policies
In the U.S. electricity market, FERC 841[3] gives a definition of ES formally. And the order also
requires each RTO and ISO to revise their tariff to establish a participation model consisting of market
rules that, recognizing the physical and operational characteristics of ES resources within 270 days.
In China, the guideline on promoting ES technology and industrial development is the first guiding
policy on ES technology and its application. The guideline points out that ES will be promoted in two
stages in the next 10 years. The first stage is the transition from demonstration to commercialization
and then to large-scale commercialization on the second stage. Under the opportunity of electricity
market reform, the demonstration project of ES should be continuously increased based on
technological innovation. Meanwhile, it needs to be combined with the Energy Internet to improve the
level of informatization and control.
The reason why some of the wholesale markets do not include ES is the absence of rules and
regulations. The order of FERC can remove barriers to fair competition for ES in the wholesale power
market, help ES gain benefits in more markets, and standardize the participation in different markets
operated by RTO and ISO. The aim of domestic guideline is also to create a better environment for ES.
The pilot construction of electricity market in China is still in the primary stage. Instead of the
formulation of specific rules in each provincial electricity market, the policy makes it clear that ES
development needs to attract investment through early-stage demonstration projects and technological
innovation, supplemented by government compensation policies and tax incentives.
2
IWRED 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 267 (2019) 032019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/267/3/032019
3.2Multi-angle policies
3.2.1Generation-side policy. The application modes of ES in generation side[4] can be divided into two
kinds. One kind is the combination with renewable energy, helping smooth the output of renewable
energy, and effectively reducing the rate of renewable energy curtailment. Another kind is
participating in ancillary services, which uses its characteristics of fast response and high accuracy.
Various states in the United States have issued different laws to promote the combination of ES and
renewable energy. Oregon's legislature passed 2193-b[5], which requires some power companies to
purchase qualified ES systems by January 1, 2020. Similar to Oregon, three investor-owned utility
companies (IOUs) in California are required to complete the ES purchase goal by 2020 under
AB2514[6]. Both of the bills promote the installation and purchase of ES on the generation side
through mandatory means.
In China, the official notice issued by national energy administration is about pilot work of the
compensation mechanism in northeast, northern and northwest part, which aims at promoting ES to
participate in ancillary services. The document stipulates that ES facilities on the generation side can
participate in peak and frequency modulation jointly with the unit or as an independent subject.
Among them, electrical ES facilities, which participate in peak regulation as independent subjects,
should have the charging power more than 10 megawatts and continuous charging time more than 4
hours. Meanwhile, power discharged by electrical ES is equivalent to power generation of plants, and
shall be settled in accordance with relevant contract price of plants.
With the rapid development of renewable energy in the United States, there is an urgent need for
ES to help the integration of renewable energy into the Internet. State governments promote the
combination of ES and renewable energy mainly through mandatory ES installation act or
compensation mechanism. Relying on the liberalized power market, the application of ES in ancillary
services market of the United States has been relatively mature, while the construction of the ancillary
services market of China is still in the pilot stage, so the basic rules should be established for the
participation of ES. The policy established the status of electric ES as an independent market entity for
the first time. It also clarified the technical requirements and settlement rules for ES participation in
the peak and frequency modulation markets, which clears the obstacles for the extensive participation
of energy storage in ancillary services.
3.2.2Grid-side policy. On the grid side, ES can be used as an alternative to the investment and
upgrading of the transmission network, improving the transmission capacity and alleviating congestion.
In addition, ES can also provide ancillary services on the grid side to improve the safety of network
operation.
In the United States, FERC 755 requires ISO to take response speed and modulation accuracy into
account when paying for ancillary services. This act mainly considers the advantages of ES over
conventional generation technology in frequency modulation. Furthermore, in order to facilitate the
access of ES system and distributed energy. The Department of Public Utilities in Massachusetts
issued a decree authorizing significant investments and upgrades to the power grid[7]. The
modernization reform of power grid mentioned in the decree will enable mechanical equipment to
automate command and control and is aimed at creating a self-healing power grid.
The official notice on the compensation mechanism in northeast, northern and northwest part in
China also clearly stipulates the ES participation and settlement rules of grid-side ancillary services.
Moreover, in order to help the power grid in consumption of renewable energy, China has issued the
notice on construction of transformation projects. And 12 ultra-high voltage transmission projects are
approved to expand the transmission capacity and create space for renewable energy access due this
year and next.
Both China and the United States have clear access and compensation rules for ES on grid-side
ancillary services, which standardizes the participation of ES and provides visible economic benefits.
The policy of U.S. also takes the advantages of ES into consideration when formulating the
3
IWRED 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 267 (2019) 032019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/267/3/032019
compensation rules, which will lead to a further increase of ES installation on grid-side. In addition,
the U.S. grid modernization act provides technical support for ES. The upgrading and transformation
of the power grid have enhanced the adaptability with ES, making the process from connection to
metering more convenient, and also facilitated centralized control of distributed devices. The
development of ES in China is still in the early stage, so the transformation of the power grid has not
been refined to the technical level of ES access, but focuses on the expansion of the grid scale. The
construction of high-capacity transmission lines increases the access amount of renewable energy, and
indirectly promotes the installation demand of ES.
3.2.3User-side policy. With the increase of user-side distributed energy, ES can be combined with it to
reduce its fluctuation. Furthermore, users can also realize energy arbitrage by storing low-cost
electricity during periods of low net demand and releasing back to the grid during periods of high net
demand.
In 2017, the New York State Public Service Commission announced the law[8] on compensation
mechanisms for solar and other distributed power sources, establishing a reasonable price mechanism
for the value created by distributed energy. In order to promote the integration of ES and distributed
energy, the Internal Revenue Service has issued the tax credit policy of investment[9], with 30% of the
tax credit used to transform the ES of existing photovoltaic systems. Meanwhile, SB 18-009 was
signed into law, which ensures the right of Colorado residents to install and use ES systems without
discrimination.
In order to guide users to install ES and promote the commercialization of ES by means of price
arbitrage, ministries in China issued the guidance of promoting power substitution. One of the focus
mentioned in guidance is widening the price gap between valley and peak. The most elastic part of
energy substitution is the ES sector, and widening the peak-valley spread provides a business model
for ES.
ES has a tight link with distributed energy, which helps the distributed energy play a good role in
the market. Therefore, state governments in U.S. provide subsidies for ES installation, and encourage
users to use ES systems by ensuring fairness in installation and charging while developing the
distributed energy. At present, the profit mode of ES on the user side in China mainly comes from
arbitrage, so the gap between peak and valley is the decisive factor affecting its return years.
Compared with foreign countries, the price difference between peak and valley in China is still small,
especially the decline of industrial electricity price further reduces the profit space of user side ES.
Therefore, the policy increases the sustainability of the user-side business model by further widening
the peak-valley price gap and attracts more installation of ES equipments.
Table 1. Energy storage policies of China and the United States
Nation United States China
Kind of policy
4
IWRED 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 267 (2019) 032019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/267/3/032019
commerciality of ES into consideration while establishing rules and technical norms, which will
promote the establishment and development of ES business model. By referring to the achievements
abroad and the comparison of policies between China and the United States, following suggestions are
given:
5. Conclusion
With the development of technology and its value excavation, ES will inevitably experience the
transition to large-scale and commercial applications. In order to facilitate the process of development,
policy assistance is essential. In this paper, ES policies of China and the United States are introduced
5
IWRED 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 267 (2019) 032019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/267/3/032019
and compared in combination with the current status of the two countries. After the analysis of
specific roles of different policies in pushing ES development, enlightenments are given in terms of
price mechanism improvement, technical standards formulation and demonstration projects promotion.
In the future, as the deepening of China's electricity market reform, it is also necessary to keep track of
the changes in the domestic and international environment and continuously optimize the policy
formulation for ES development.
Acknowledgement
The study was supported by the Simulation on the Continuous Operation of Electricity Market in
Zhejiang, and its financial support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Chen DY, Zhang LZ, Wang S and Mou LF. Development of Energy Storage in Frequency
Regulation Market of United States and Its Enlightenment. 2013 China J. Automation of
Electric Power Systems. 37(1) 9-13
[2] Sun BY, Yang SL, Liu ZQ, Li TT. Analysis on Present Application of Megawatt-scale Energy
Storage in Frequency Regulation and Its Enlightenment. 2017 China J. Automation of
Electric Power Systems. 41(11) 8-16
[3] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2018. Electric Storage Participation in Markets
Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators.
https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2018/021518/E-1.pdfLl
[4] Teng F , Strbac G. Business cases for energy storage with multiple service provision 2016
UK J. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. 4(4) 615-25
[5] Oregon Legislature 2015. HB 2193-
B.https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2193Kk
[6] California Energy Commission 2010. Assembly Bill No. 2514.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/assessments/ab2514_energy_storage.htmlJj
[7] Department of Public Utilities in Massachusetts 2018. Act to improve grid resiliency through
energy storage. https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H4739K
[8] NYSERDA department of Public Service 2018. Energy Storage Fact Sheet.
https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/-/media/Files/Programs/Energy-Storage/Energy-Storage-
FactSheet
[9] Department of the Treasury 2018. Internal Revenue Code. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-
wd/201809003.pdf