Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
INTRODUCTION
Science education plays a vital role in adjudicating scientific and technological advancement
for every individual. It helps us to adapt the trend of the 21 st century. The major goal of science is
to develop scientifically literate and personally concerned individuals with high competence for
rational thought and action (Alebiosu, 1998). Science educations engage on individuals thinking
The utmost bourne of every teacher is to impact knowledge where the needs of every
student. The best way by which student could be assisted is to make the learning-teaching
process a pleasurable activity through the use of appropriate instruction materials and teaching
strategies (Adeboyeje and Afolabi, 1991). Teaching strategies is one way to catch the student
attention and meet their needs. It has a great impact on student achievement in school.
Teaching strategy is a teaching approach that is used in improving instruction. It is all that
teachers do in planning, implementing and evaluating instruction and the act of providing
activities that can facilitate learning of the students. It is important for students to learn not only
the subject matter, but also how to think through experiences. They do not only become familiar
with the strategies of the teacher in delivering the lesson but also they develop ways to think and
task. It is a student-centered approach where students can learn interaction and improved social
skills. It can help students know their responsibility in doing things and can accelerate students’
Think Pair Share Strategy is one cooperative learning strategy that requires students to
interact with their partners by sharing individual ideas in solution after a period of individual think
time. The think pair share strategy is designed to differentiate instruction by providing students
time and structure for thinking on a given worksheets, enabling them to formulate individual ideas
and share these ideas with a partner (Kagan, 1998). This learning strategy stimulates classroom
1
interaction by encouraging of students’ response, rather than using a traditional method in which
a teacher poses a question and one student offers a response, additionally, this strategy provides
an opportunity for all students to share their thinking with at least one other. In this method, a
problem is posed, students have time to think about it individually, and then they work in pairs to
solve the problem and share ideas with class (Baumeister, 1992).
The think pair share strategy increases the kinds of personal communication that are
necessary for student to internally process, organize and retain ideas (Pimm, 1987). This study
would like to determine the effectiveness of think pair share strategy on the student’s
performance in science.
This study will find out the effectiveness of Think Pair Share Strategy on the performance in
1. What is the pretest score in Science of the students when grouped to:
b. Lecture method?
2. What is the posttest score in Science of the students when exposed to:
b. Lecture method?
3. Is there a significant difference between the pretest scores in Science of the students
4. Is there a significant difference between the posttest scores in Science of the students
5. Is there a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores in Science of the
2
Null hypotheses:
H01: There is no significant difference between the pretest scores in Science of the students when
H02: There is no significant difference between the posttest scores in Science of the students
H03: There is no significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores in Science of the
students when exposed to Think Pair Share Strategy and Lecture method.
The study will determine the effectiveness of Think Pair Share Strategy on the performance
b. Lecture method
b. Lecture method
3. Find out the significant difference between the pretest scores in Science of the students
4. Find out the significant difference between the posttest scores in Science of the students
5. Find out the significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores in Science of
the students when exposed to Think Pair Share Strategy and lecture method.
3
1.4. Significance of the study
For the students, they will be benefited from the use of think pair share strategy. By this, they will
be able to adapt the use of think pair share strategy to compensate their weaknesses in science
subject. For the teachers, it is helpful for them to use the think pair share strategy in improving
the ability of students in science. For the parents, this study is relevant for them to be aware of
the performance of their children in terms of communication skill and participation with the use of
think pair share strategy they can also teach their children to improve their performance in
science. For the school administrators, they see the need to provide for performance
development and for other researchers, they will be able to modify or use the think pair share
strategy.
This study will focus on the use of Think Pair Share Strategy in teaching Science and its
School SY 2016-2017. The Grade eighth section Blooming and Cheerful students will be the
subject of the study. The conduct of study will have three consecutive, once with three main
topics entitled digestive system ( parts of digestive system, how enzymes affect digestion and
To facilitate better understanding of this study, the following terms are defined through
context.
Constructivism students construct their own understanding and knowledge through experiences
and reflecting those experiences.
Experimental group refers to the students using the Think Pair Strategy.
Lecture Method refers to the teaching method that is more student centered discussion.
Performance refers to the pretest and posttest scores of the students in Science.
Posttest is a test will be given to the students after the implementation of the study.
4
Rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly represents the performance expectations for an assignment
or piece of work
Think Pair Share Strategy refers to the strategy used in the study. A tool to elevate students’
performance. A strategy where the students work in pair to produce a discussion.
5
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Active learning engages students in the process of learning through activities and discussion
Using active learning strategies can lead to successful learning and teaching. Teachers are
not sensitive to student or more incorrect assumption concerning strategy use (Arabsolghar and
Elkins, 2001; Griffiths and Parr, 2001). To provide a strategy instruction that is beneficial to
students from diverse backgrounds, teachers should know the use of active learning strategies by
Active learning has greater impact on student mastery of higher-versus lower-level cognitive
skills and the recognition in contrast to course examination that emphasize content mastery or the
Cooperative learning has been well documented in the educational research as a successful
cooperative learning that group members are linked together in such a way that they cannot
succeed unless everyone succeed, they will actively assist each other to make sure that the
assignment is done and the purpose of the group achieved (Deutsch, 1949). They acquire this by
providing help and cooperation to each other, sharing resources, and encouraging each other’s
efforts. As a result, group members who work in cooperative groups outperform students who
work by themselves or in competition with each other (as seen in competitive conventional
classrooms) (Johnson & Johnson, 2004). Cooperative learning is one of the two ways of
organizing the learning environment of a classroom, the other being competitive. In cooperative
learning environment, the goals of separate individuals become so linked that there is a positive
correlation between them; on the contrary, in a competitive conventional environment, the goals
of the students are so linked that there is a negative correlation between their goal attainments
6
(Johnson & Johnson, 1994). Cooperative learning establishes a community in which students can
students into small group, which then work together to help one another learn academic content
(Slavin, 2011). Cooperative learning is a valuable tool for learning in academic institution today
(Johnson, Johnson and Smith, 2007), as it provides benefits for both students and instructor
(Shimazoe and Aldrich, 2010). One that illustrate as an instructional method is the Think Pair
Share.
The instructional method Think Pair Share is a simple and quick technique to help warm up
the class (Barkley, Cross and Major, 2014). It is an easily acceptable form of discussion as it
allows students to rehearse in low-risk situation (Barkley, Cross and Major, 2014), clarifying their
front of a group (Millis, 1990). This helps improve the quality of discussion and increase students
The Think Pair Share activity (Lyman, 1981, 1987) is a learner- centered and highly effective
collaborative teaching strategy that is used widely in higher education. The TPS activity promotes
student learning through a sequence of three phases. First , student individually reflect on the
subject matter, then pair with a partner in class to discuss the information, and finally share ideas
from their discussions with the class as a whole. TPS is believed to not only enhance student
learning but it also engages all students in discussion, including those who may be more reserved
and less likely to share unprompted class (Karge, Philips, Jesse, McCabe, 2011)
Sharing in pairs, students get a chance to hear the knowledge restated from peers, rather
than the instructor (Gray and Madson, 2007). This enables student to interact more with each
other even in a large classroom (Rao and DiCarlo, 2000). Active discussion helps students learn
more effectively with more independent thinking (Crouch and Mazur, 2001), thus potentially
increasing students attention span and appealing to a greater number of learners (Rao and
DiCarlo, 2000).
7
Research has shown that peer discussion enhances understanding even when none of the
students in a discussion group originally knows the correct answer (Smith, et.al, 2009). The Think
Pair Share technique has been found to help increase students participation, generate more long
explanation to question, while instilling more confidence and comfort in students when
Engaging in active and analytical discussions, students can have increased mastery of both
conceptual reasoning and quantitative problem solving skills (Crouch and Mazur, 2001).
Teaching strategies shape the learning environment. As part of the lesson design, an
effective teacher selects a particular teaching strategy or set of strategies to engage in learning.
There are teaching strategies that can be transferred from one subject to the next. There are also
strategies that are more specific to subject area. The high impact-teaching for science include
teachers enthusiasm, targeting misconception, excursion, usable and practical science, group
8
3. THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This study will anchor on the theory of constructivist learning theory, cognitive development
Constructivist teaching is based on the belief that learning occurs as learners are actively
information. Through dealing with concrete objects, a child’s physical experience accelerate and
he is able conceptualize, think innovatively and logically. According to this theory, learners are the
Constructivists suggest that learning is more efficient when a student is engaged in the learning
process rather than trying to receive knowledge inactively. Children learn best when they are
those experiences.
Piaget`s work led to cognitive development theory. He believed that cognitive development
appears through sequential qualitative changes in cognitive structures. The theory suggested that
human are incapable to automatically understand and use information that they have been given
because they need to construct their prior knowledge trough prior personal experiences to enable
them to create mental images. He says that humans learn by constructing their own knowledge.
The main role of teacher should be motivating the children to create their own knowledge through
personal experiences.
Teachers are merely facilitator who encourages learners in the learning process. Learners
should take control in making decision in line with their needs. Piaget advocated nonintervention
saying that everything one teaches a child prevents him from discovering.
9
Piaget’s theory focuses on how learners interact with their environment to evolve complex
reasoning and knowledge. According to Piaget, understanding comes from the actions performed
by an individual in response to his or her environment. These actions change in time from very
physical actions to partly internalized actions that can be accomplished through the use of
The theory of multiple intelligence states that there are multiple forms of intelligence that exist
in every individual (Gardner, 1983). This theory aids teachers in easily creating more
personalized and diversified instructional experiences (Wilson, 1998). It helps teachers explicate
and promote understanding at intrapersonal, interpersonal and cultural events. The student`s
intrinsic levels of motivation helps teacher construct self-motivating educational experiences and
help promote the concept in the classroom. Provides teachers and students with more expansive
Figure 1 shows the relationship of the independent variable (Think Pair Strategy) to the
10
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study will use the true experimental design, the randomized pretest-posttest control
group design. Two sections are used, with one group will be exposed to Think Pair Share
Random assignment is used to form the groupings. The performance of students is measured
through giving of pretest and posttest before and after implementation of the topics chosen by the
where:
The subject of the study will be the Grade 8 students section Blooming and Cheerful of
Cabalantian, one of the barangay of Manticao, Misamis Oriental. The school has thirty
teachers;some of them are master teacher. The students are mostly from the hinterlands and the
11
rest come from the nearby barangays. The school is (6 km) away from the National highway.
(fig.2)
Prior to the conduct of the study, the author will ask permission Letters of request to conduct
the study will give to the school Principal of Cabalantian National High School to conduct a
pretest and after the school Principal sign the letter of permission the author will consult the
science teacher about the topic to be handled and will start the pretesting. For the gathering of
data, the author will asks permission from the school Principal of Cabalantian National High
School to conduct the study in their school. The student will group according to control and
experimental group then take their pretest. Pretest will be used to determine the initial level of the
students’ performance in science. After conducting the pretest, the author will conduct the study
and implement the strategy in class. According to Lyman (1981-1987) Think Pair Share Strategy
is implemented using the following steps. First, student individually reflects on the subject matter.
Second, students will pair with a partner in class to discuss the information. Third, students share
ideas from their discussions with the class as a whole. During the discussion of ideas, the teacher
will rate the student through the use of scoring rubric. The rubrics have different category that
have a corresponding points and can be seen on the Appendix 8. On the other hand, in the
control group, the students will not exposed to think pair share strategy in teaching Science. After
several sessions on the covered topics, the students of control and experimental group will take
their posttest. The author will gather the data to analyze the results of the study. (Figure 3).
12
Figure 2.Map showing the location of Cabalantian National High School (CNHS), Cabalantian,
Manticao, Misamis Oriental
13
Identification of Cabalantian National High School
Grade 10 Students
Grade 8 section Grade 8 section
N=89
Blooming Cheerful
Conduct of posttest
Organization of data
Data analysis
Percentage
T-test
Paired t-test
Concept development
14
4.4. Instrument used in the study
For the experimental group the researcher will use Think Pair Share Strategy. The researcher
will be use chalkboards and printed materials. Student will be work in pair to produce a
discussion. In the other group which is the control group, lesson will be taught purely using
A pretest questionnaire is given before the implementation of the study and posttest
questionnaire is given after the implementation of the study. Both pretest and posttest are
The students’ performance in Science will be determined based on the grading system
designed by the Department of Education (2015). The minimum competency, which will be
considered as passing score in this study, is 50%. The grading system of the students’
SCORE DESCRIPTOR
19-20 Outstanding
18 Very satisfactory
16-17 Satisfactory
15 fairly satisfactory
1-14 did not meet expectation
The criteria above mean: Outstanding – the performance of the students who are able to
answer 90% -100% correctly. Very Satisfactory – the performance level of the students who are
able to answer 85% -89% correctly. Satisfactory – the performance level of the students who are
able to answer 80% -84% correctly. Fairly Satisfactory – the performance level of the students
who are able to answer 75%-79% correctly. Did Not Meet Expectation– the performance level of
the students who are able to answer less than 75% correctly?
15
4.5. Data Analysis
The gathered data will be analyzed using percentage, t-test, and paired t-test.
respondent.
fi
%=
n
Where:
2. T-test will be used to test the significant difference between the pretest and posttest
x1 −x2
√
2 2
t= s1 s 2
+
n1 n2
where:
16
3. Paired t-test
d
t = √ s 2/ n
where:
17
LITERATURE CITED
Adeboyeje, R.A. &Afolabi, F. O. 1991. Classroom Management Ife Olwuwa Enterprises Nig. Ltd
Alebiosu, K.A. .1998. Effects of Two Co-operative Learning Models on Senior Secondary School
Student Learning Outcomes in Chemistry, University of Thadan Nigeria.
Arabsolghar, F., & Elkins, J. 2001. Teachers’ expectations about students’ use of reading
strategies knowledge and behavior in grades 3, 5 and 7. Journal of Research in
Reading, 24(2), 154-162.
Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. 2014. Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook
for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
Baumeister, M.1992. Think Pair Share: Effects on oral Language, Reading Comprehension and
Attitudes.
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and
results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.
DepEd Order No.8.s. 2015. Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12.
Basic Education Program. Pasig City
Gray, T., &Madson, L. 2007.Ten easy ways to engage your students. College Teaching, 55(2),
83-87.
Gardner, H.1983. Frame of Mind; The Theory of Multiple Intelligence, Basic Book, New York.
Griffiths, C. & M. Parr.2001. Language-learning strategies: theory and perception. ELT Journal
55.3, 247-254
Johnson D.W. and Johnson. R.T, 1994. Learning together and alone. Allyn and Bacon, London
Johnson D.W. and Johnson. R.T., 2004 Assessing students in group Crown Press, California
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K.2007. The state of cooperative learning in post
secondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15-29.
Kagan, S.1998. Dr. Spencer Kagan`s New Cooperative Learning Smart Card. San Clemente:
Kagan Cooperative Learning.
18
Lucas, M.R., Corpuz, B.2014. Facilitating Learning 4th Edition: A Metacognitive Process pg.1
53-157.
Karge, B. D., Phillips, K. M., Jessee, T., McCabe, M. (2011). Effective strategies for engaging
adult learners. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8, 53-56.
Millis, B. J.1990. Helping Faculty Build Learning Communities Through Cooperative Groups: To
Improve the Academy.
Murie.R.C. 2004. Effects of Communication Learning. San Clemente, CA. Kagan Publishing
Ornstein, A.1990. Strategies for Effective Teaching, Haper Collins Publisher, Inc. Navotas Metro
Manila pg. 542.
Piaget, J.P. 1952. The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International University Press, New
York.
Shimazoe, J., and Aldrich, H.2010. Group work can be gratifying: Understanding and
overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58, 52-57.
Smith, M. K., W. B. Wood, W. K. Adams, C. Wieman, J. K. Knight, N. Guild, and T. T. Su. 2009.
“Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept
Questions.” Science, 323, 122-24.
UNESCO. 1993. Strategies and Methods for Teaching Values in the Context of Science and
Technology
Wilson, L.O.1996. Why teacher are drawn to using multiple intelligence: Theory in their
classroom. New Horizon for learning.
19
GANNT CHART
20
LINE ITEM BUDGET
ADVISER SNACKS
Php. 813.00
21
Appendix 1. Letter of request to the principal of Cabalantian National High School to
conduct the study
Mindanao State University at Naawan
College of Education and Social Sciences
DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY AND ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental
January 2017
EDNA B. NABUA
Principal I
Cabalantian National High School
Cabalantian, Manticao,Misamis Oriental
Dear Sir:
Greetings of peace!
I am a third year BSE General Science student of MSU at Naawan and will be conducting
a study entitled “THINK PAIR SHARE STRATEGY ON THE PERFORMANCE IN
SCIENCE OF GRADE 8 STUDENTS” in partial fulfillment of the subject EdSc 199
(Undergraduate Thesis).
In connection with this, I would like to ask permission from your good office to let me
conduct the said study in your school wherein the participants will be the Grade 10
Loyalty students.
Respectfully yours,
JENELYN T. PANSACALA
Noted by:
Approved by:
BELLA S. AMARGA
Chairperson, DSEE
22
Appendix 2. Letter of request to the Grade 8 Blooming Science Teacher
Mindanao State University at Naawan
College of Education and Social Sciences
DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY AND ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental
January 2017
Dear Madam:
Greetings of peace!
I am a third year BSE General Science student of MSU at Naawan and will be conducting
a study entitled “THINK PAIR SHARE STRATEGY ON THE PERFORMANCE IN
SCIENCE OF GRADE 8 STUDENTS” in partial fulfillment of the subject EdSc 198
(Methods of Research).
In connection with this, I would like to ask permission to conduct my study in your Physics
class. Your students in Section Blooming will be the participants of my study.
Respectfully you,
JENELYN T. PANSACALA
Noted by:
Approved by:
BELLA S. AMARGA
Chairperson, DSEE
23
Appendix 3. Letter of request to the Grade 8 Cheerful Science Teacher
Mindanao State University at Naawan
College of Education and Social Sciences
DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY AND ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental
January 2017
Dear Madam:
Greetings of peace!
I am a third year BSE General Science student of MSU at Naawan and will be conducting
a study entitled “THINK PAIR SHARE STRATEGY ON THE PERFORMANCE IN
SCIENCE OF GRADE 8 STUDENTS” in partial fulfillment of the subject EdSc 198
(Methods of Research).
In connection with this, I would like to ask permission to conduct my study in your Physics
class. Your students in Section Cheerful will be the participants of my study.
Respectfully yours,
JENELYN T. PANSACALA
Noted by:
Approved by:
BELLA S. AMARGA
Chairperson, DSEE
24
25
Appendix 5: Pretest questionnaire
I. Multiple choice
Direction: Encircle the letter of the correct answer.
1.Enzymes in the gastric juices breaks proteins down into:
A. lipids
B. amino acids
C. amylase
D: simple sugar
2. What type of food begins the digestion process in the small intestine?
A: starches
B. proteins
C: sugars
D: fats
26
9. What break
Appendix 5. food into smaller
Pretest pieces to (continued)
questionnaire begin mechanical digestion?
A. stomach
B: esophagus
C. amylase
D. teeth
10. Gastric glands increase their secretory activity in response to a hormone released from
the:
A: pancreas
B. stomach
C. liver
D. duodenum
15.The muscles of the esophagus squeeze the food downward using the process of:
A. gravity
B. peristalsis
C. rugae
D. chime
27
Appendix 6: Posttest questionnaire
I. Multiple choice
Direction: Encircle the letter of the correct answer.
28
D. large intestine
8.The muscles of the esophagus squeeze the food downward using the process of:
A. gravity
B. peristalsis
C. rugae
D. chime
9.Gastric glands increase their secretory activity in response to a hormone released from
the:
A: pancreas
B. stomach
C. liver
D. duodenum
12. What break food into smaller pieces to begin mechanical digestion?
A. stomach
B: esophagus
C. amylase
D. teeth
13. What type of food begins the digestion process in the small intestine?
A. starches
B. proteins
C: sugars
D. fats
29
Appendix 6. Posttest questionnaire (continued)
30
1. B 1. D
2. D 2. A
3. A 3. B
4. B 4. D
5. D 5. A
6. B 6. B
7. D 7. A
8. D 8. B
9. D 9. B
10. B 10. D
11. B 11. B
12. D 12. D
13. A 13. D
14. B 14. B
15. B 15. B
16. D 16. D
17. A 17. B
18. B 18. A
19. B 19. B
20. A 20. D
31
CATEGORY EXEMPLARY GOOD MARGINAL UNACCEPTABLE
Critical Thinking Enhances the critical Some critical Responds to Does not respond to
thinking process thinking and question but question pose by the
consistently through reflection is not engage in facilitator
reflection and demonstrated in premise
questioning of self discussion by the reflection
and others; is a responder
quality response that
advances thoughts
forward; adds to the
discussion/ is critical
response.
Encourages and Responds to Limited Responds to the
facilitates interaction other members of interaction or discussion facilitator
among members of the group. responses to only. No interaction
the group. Reflects Reflects own other with peers.
and evaluates own practices and members of
practice and experiences. the group.
experiences.
Collaboration Encourages
colleagues to
evaluate their
teaching.
Professional Professional Professional Professional
Professional vocabulary are used vocabulary are vocabulary are vocabulary are not
Language consistently used frequently used
used.
throughout the throughout the occasionally
discussion. discussion. throughout the
discussion.
One thread and two One thread and Thread of two Thread and
Timeliness responses posted one response on responses responses late.
within time frame. time. One late.
response late.
Total Score
32
At the end of the lesson students will be able to:
a. describe what is digestive system
b. illustrate the parts of digestive system
c. appreciate the importance of digestive system
T: Good day class! How are S(all): Were fine maam and you?
you today?
T: I’m fine too.
T: So, today we will talk about
Digestive System
The will facilitate and guide the Digestive System is defined as series of organs
student in accomplishing that convert food into nutrients that can be
the task. used up by the body
33
Appendix 9. Lesson Plan in Science day 1: (Experimental group) continued
GENERALIZATION:
Digestive System is defined as series of organs that convert food into nutrients that can
be used up by the body. It is made up of the mouth, esophagus, stomach, small
intestine, large intestine, rectum and anus that have different functions.
IV. Evaluation
Direction: Label the parts of human digestive system projected in the board
V. Assignment
35
Topic: Parts of Digestive System
Materials: Chalk and Board, Multimedia presentation
Skills: describing, analyzing
Reference: Science Link 8 (K-12) First Edition by Aquino, M.D., Valdoz, M.P, Mariano,
J.M., Bascara, M.T. pg. 95-107
T: Good day class! How are you today? S: (all) Were fine maam and you?
T: okay class our topic for today is all
about Digestive System.
Anyone from the class knew what is
digestive system?
( calling names and read )
S1: Digestive System is defined as
Digestive System is defined as series of series of organs that convert food
organs that convert food into into nutrients that can be used up
nutrients that can be used up by the by the body.
body.
Very Good!!
( Elaborate more the ideas)
36
Next is the pharynx
(calling names and read)
Pharynx is a funnel shaped tube that is S3: Pharynx is a funnel shaped tube
connected to the mouth. It is charged that is connected to the mouth. It is
with passing chewed food into the charged with passing chewed food
esophagus from the mouth into the esophagus from the mouth
Peristalsis is the process where food is S4: Peristalsis is the process where
converted into a small round mass food is converted into a small round
and transferred into stomach. mass and transferred into stomach.
Very Good!!!
37
(calling names and read) S7: Large Intestine is charged with
absorbing water and breaking
wastes.
Very good…
GENERALIZATION:
Digestive System is defined as series of organs that convert food into nutrients that can be
used up by the body. It is made up of the mouth, esophagus, stomach, small intestine,
large intestine, rectum and anus that have different functions.
IV. Evaluation
Direction: Label the parts of human digestive system. Give an illustration.
V. Assignment
Study in advance about how enzymes affect digestion
38
At the end of the lesson students will be able to:
a. explain how enzymes affect digestion
b. identify what are those enzymes
c. appreciate the essence of digestive enzymes in our body.
T: Good day class! How are S(all): Were fine maam and you?
you today? S(all): Yes maam.
T: I’m fine too. So did you
review last night?
T: So, today we will talk about
enzymes affect digestion.
The will facilitate and guide the Digestion is the complex process of turning the
student in accomplishing food you eats into which the body uses for
the task. energy, growth and cell repair needed to
survive.
1. Mechanical Digestion
2. Chemical Digestion
3.
39
Mechanical digestion involves physically breaking
the food into smaller pieces. Mechanical
digestion begins in the mouth as the food is
chewed.
GENERALIZATION:
Digestion is the complex process of turning the food you eat into nutrients, which the
body uses for energy, growth and cell repair needed to survive. The digestion process
involves creating waste to be eliminated. Haven’t have enough digestive enzymes, we
can’t break down our food and we cannot absorb all the good nutrition.
IV. Evaluation
Direction: Give 10 examples of food that are rich in carbohydrates and proteins.
V. Assignment
40
Appendix 12. Lesson Plan in Science day2: (Control group)
I. Learning objectives
At the end of the lesson students will be able to:
a. explain how enzymes affect digestion
b. identify what are those enzymes
c. appreciate the essence of digestive enzymes in our body.
T: Good day class! How are S(all): Were fine maam and you?
you today? S(all): Yes maam.
T: I’m fine too. So did you
review last night?
T: So, today we will talk about
enzymes affect digestion.
So what is digestion?
( calling names and read)
S1: Digestion is the complex process of turning
Digestion is the complex the food you eats into which the body uses for
process of turning the energy, growth and cell repair needed to
food you eats into which survive.
the body uses for energy,
growth and cell repair
needed to survive.
41
(calling names and read) S2: Enzymes are type of protein that causes
chemical reaction.
Enzymes are type of protein
that causes chemical
reaction.
GENERALIZATION:
Digestion is the complex process of turning the food you eat into nutrients, which the
body uses for energy, growth and cell repair needed to survive. The digestion process
involves creating waste to be eliminated. Haven’t have enough digestive enzymes, we
can’t break down our food and we cannot absorb all the good nutrition.
IV. Evaluation
Direction: Cite some causes why digestive enzymes stop working correctly in the body.
V. Assignment
42
Appendix 13. Lesson Plan in Science day3: (Experimental group)
I. Learning objectives
At the end of the lesson students will be able to:
a explain how pH affect enzyme activity
b. infer carbohydrates and proteins
c. appreciate the importance of pH in our body
T: Good day class! How are S(all): Were fine maam and you?
you today? S(all): Yes maam.
T: I’m fine too. So did you
review last night?
T: So, today we will talk about
how pH affects enzymes
activity.
43
Carbohydrates are needed by our body as the
primary source of energy. It will broke down into
simple sugars that absorbed in the small
intestine.
GENERALIZATION:
pH is the measure of the concentration of hydrogen ions in a solution. Not all parts of the
digestive tract have same pH because different stages of digestive process require
different levels of acidity.
IV. Evaluation
Direction: Cite some causes why digestive enzymes stop working correctly in the body.
V. Assignment
44
Appendix 14. Lesson Plan in Science day3 :( Control group)
I. Learning objectives
At the end of the lesson students will be able to:
a. explain how pH affect enzyme activity
b. infer carbohydrates and proteins
c. appreciate the importance of pH in our body
T. Good morning class, how are S(all): Good morning too maam, were fine
you today? and you?
45
T. Okay!!! That’s right. Very good…
(Elaborate more ideas)
Proteins build and repair tissues. It S3: Proteins build and repair tissues. It can
can be obtained from nuts, be obtained from nuts, dairy, meats,
dairy, meats, beans and grains. beans and grains.
GENERALIZATION:
pH is the measure of the concentration of hydrogen ions in a solution. Not all parts of the
digestive tract have same pH because different stages of digestive process require
different levels of acidity.
IV. Evaluation
Direction: Give 10 examples of food that are rich in carbohydrates and proteins.
V. Assignment
46
Study in advance about nutrition and wellness.
47