Low-Cost Di Rectionally-Solidified: Turbine Blades
Low-Cost Di Rectionally-Solidified: Turbine Blades
Low-Cost Di Rectionally-Solidified: Turbine Blades
NASA 0R-159464
.... VOLUME 1 OF 2
^ m_e=^l_rW _1-_q53-1
(NASA-CB-159q6q) LON-COST N79-24121
DZR2CTZONALI, Y-SCL'I'D-._F.I_D TURBINE BIADES_
VOLUNE 1 Conpletton 8epo£t (AiReseacch _f9.
Co.e Phoenizr A_tz.) 272 F tic A12/MF A01 0nclas
CSCI. 11P G3/26 22146
LOW-COST DI RECTIONALLY-SOLIDIFIED
TURBINE BLADES
VOLUME I
by
- L.W. Sink
- G, S, Hoppin, IlL,
--;; M.-Fujii .
!
!
i..... FOREWORD.
,1
This Preject Completion Report was PreDated for the National Ai
I
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center. It
presents the results of a Drogram conducted to establish
exotbermic heated casting technology for. the manufacture of low-
_._ cost, _irectionally-solidlfied, uncoole_ turbine blades for aas
£11
v
INTRODUCTION 1
iI_;_r,_I_PAGB _N_ lgO? FILMED.
SUMMARY 4
Process Development 10 _
Exothermic behavior 27
Mechanical-property evaluations 29
Chemical analyses 40
Mold manufacture 42
Casting process 42
Scope 45
Metallurgical Evaluation 53
Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) 53
Chemical analyses 63
Mechanical tests 68
Thermal fatigue tests 88
Dynamic modulus testing 92
Metallographic examination 95
V
,i
¥,
Scope 102
PropertyTesting 103
v_
k
Q_
,>
i S_ope 217
; : Blade Manufacture 217
_- CONCLUSIONS 237
i:
APPENDIX A 241
vi_
d
,b
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.-
viii
LIST DE ILLUSTRATIONS (Contd)
Title Page k
" 15 Wax Pattern Assembly for Exothermic DS Casting k
r:4 SiX Task II Tes_ Slabs 49
.18..........
Typical MAR-M 247 _asK II Exothermically Cast
DS Preliminary Design TFE711-3 Turbine_Blades 58
ix
i
d
32 Tensile
TransverseProperties
Specimens Versus Temperature
From TaskforIII !
Machined
_ MAR-M 247 Exothermically Cast DS Preliminary
i : Design TFE731-3 Turbine Blades iii
33 Average Stress-Rupture Strength ef Dg MAR-M 247
i- Versus Equlaxed IN100, 0.178-cm (0.071_.-inch) _
MFB Test Specimens ........... 119
RL
LIST OF _LLUSTRATIONS-(Contd) .....................
Tit Pa_Lg...........
---A
37 Larso_-Miller 2.0-Percent C_eep Curv_ for K
DS MAR-M 247, Longitudinal Data, 0.178-cm
(0.070-1nch) MFB Test Specimens 112
42 ........
Thermal Expansion of Exothermically Cast DS
MAR-M 247 and NASA_TRW_R 138
xi
_m
_i The AcicularMPaPhase
I144°K/317 Formed
(1600_F/46 at
ksi)1255°K (1800°F)
for 1270 Hours.
is Absent 149 .......
i_- . 50 Microstructures
Test Specimen No.of 148-1.
DS MAR-MSpecimen
247 Stress-Rupture
was Tested
-j
xii
=
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Contd)
k
54-- -Vector Diagram Data for the Rotor 160 ......................
--_
55 Rotor Hub Section [R = 10.77 cm (4.24 in)]
Cylindrical Cut--- 161
59 Loading of the
the Rotor-Hub 163
60 Loading of Rotor Tip 165
xiv
9
n T. OF ILLUSTRATIONS
(Coned)
xv
• LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Contd)
k
--_ i08- As-Cast and Finish-Machined Exothermically L%
Cast DS TFE7-31-3 Final Design Blades of i
MAR--M 247 223
-_ xvi
- [
r
i • LIsT OF TABLES
im •
V Task- I
_, Tensile
Cast Test
Test Results on DS Cast
Separately Specimens 39
! xvli
¥
'i
LzsoFTABLES
(Contdl
_ Table Title Page
_,_: XX ...........
Task II 1255°K (1800°F) Stress-Rupture Test
_, Results - Transverse Grain Orientation 74
I
XXI Task II Room-TemperatureTensile Test Results 77
,i! Results 80
i XXIV Ta_k II 1255°K- (1800°F) Stress-Rupture Test
XXV Task II 1255°K (1800°F) Stress-Rupture Test
% Results 81
!.
I
: xviii
LIST OF TABLES (Contd)
- xix
•. LIST OF TABLES (CQntd) ,
- XX
¥
!_ INTRODUCTION
I _* Cost
process
stage
and fuel consumption
development
through
in the TFE731-3
performed
component
Turbofan
included, those efforts
Engine.
required
The
to
*
from demonstration
the previously by demonstrated
engine test. feasibility
Portions
" carry the technology
!; of the overall effort included process scale-up, alloy evalua-
E
tions, mechanical property generation, hardware procurement,• and
full-scale engine test ingLto eYalua_e potential benefits.
I
!
t_ This report constitutes Volume 1 of a two-volume Project
2
r
L
disk, and design the blade alrf_il and-blade root te best aocom-
. 00000001-TSBC
SUMMARY
blades of the new design were cast in the MAR-M 247 and
_'_ MAR-M 200eHf alloys. These blades were finish processed through ,
! ,
the results o£ tests on 0.178-cm (0.070-inch) gauge diameter
minibars machined f_om the DS blades (MFB). ThisMFB minibar was
%
thus used for all--subsequent tensile and stress_rupture testing _
in this..p_oject.
5
• , t"
!D_--• ,,•_
i.__t
_ _.
• •.. d
MAR-M 247. .!
![.
!L_
I
TASK I - CASTING-TECHNOLOG_
Exothermically-Heated Casting System
[
iiI and is also open (in a flat plane) on the bottom. After dewax and
i i_ firing this mold is fitted inside a preformed refractory sleeve
.... and surrounded with a suitable high-firing temperature exothermic
material. The exothermic material is packed around and over the
f tops of the airfoil mold and gating, leaving the top and bottom
openings of the mold exposed. The mold assembly is_then heated
by the heat released from ignition of the exothermic material to
a temperature above the melting point of the alloy to be cast.
7
:'OUR:
• LOAD PREHEATED MOLD INTO
CASTING FURNACE ON CHILL
PLATE
• EVACUATE FURNACE
• I_DU_I
• HOLD IN FURNACE FOR
DWELL TIME
8
the melting point of the alloy. Therefore, those grains
nucleated at the chill plate that have a crystallographic
orientation favorable for rapid grain growth in the direction of %
the mold temperature gradient quickly develop a columnar grain _
structure that is perpendicular to the chill. In the ease of a
turbine blade casting, parallel grains [of (I00) crystalline
direction] grow in the spanwise direction of the blade.
7-
.L
.I
Process Development-
- l0
ij__-_¸_ _'_
prince (firsti coat that contacts the molten metal during the pour-
ing process. The back-up coats, which give the mold its basic ................
I. Molds 1 and 2. The initial mold was cast with the exist-
i_
_ _ *Registered trademark of E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
(3)Kanab¥ et al, "Automated Directional Solidification of
Superalloys," AFML-TR-75-.150, 1975)
i
k
DOWNSPRUE
8LADES
12
¥
each of 4 spokes, with the fifth spoke having six 1.587-cm (0.625-
inch) diameter test bars. This test-bar spoke was "Y" shaped to
accommodate the two additional parts. The mold was cast with the
blades in a root-down orientation. _
mic material against a larger surface area on the blade root and , i
I
The copper chill for these two molds had been newly resur-
faced with a shallow-groove, diamond-shaped 0.317-cm (0.125-inch)
grid pattern for increased contact area with the casting. This
grid pattern did not incorporate draft _n the grooves, and conse-
quently, the solidified castings were tightly locked into the
13
k
"4
t I
- i
DOWNSPRUE
_ . A
--" iC'4_
/t
8_DES
TESTBAR_
• ji'_
i
Vl
i
inches) above the top of the test bars. Mold 3 was filled with
standard size briquets in the same manner as Mold i.
Each mold was preheated and ignited using the same procedure
as was used with Molds 1 and 2. However, as soon as visible flames
stopped coming from the bottom of the pack, the mold was placed in
the vacuum mold interlock and the metal was poured after pump-
down. This reduced the ambient air temperature exposure time
15
< Figure 4. Task I, Mold 2 Blades Showing Good Grain Structure in
Blade "C3" with Undesirable Gra_.n Structure in the
Other Three Blade Castings
16
i "
pou ring.
17
___.
¥
CI
<}
18
Evaluation of the g_ain structures of castings from these two
molds confirmed that the 1366"K (2000°F) furnace ignition aided in
obtaining better columnar grain control as shown in Figure 6.
Results also indicated that it was of benefit to retain the mold
vious higher
much molds preheated
temperature at had
I144°K
been (1600_F).
obtained Evidence
as compared in tosupport of
the pre-
this conclusion was the nearly total fusing of the individual
briquets into a monolithic mass in the outer radial regions of the .............
mold. However, nearer the center of the mold cluster, tempera-
tures attained during the burn appeared considerably lower. This
was evidenced by briquets near the center downsprue and in contact
with the center blade cavities. These briquets had sagged some-
what from their original shape and sintered to adjacent briquets,
rather than fusing into one continuous mass. It was felt that
these physical indications of maximum temperature correlated well
with the quality of columnar grains obtained on the individual
castings from the central to outer locations.
19
- .
i
%
li-
i-
r
: 20
FI
K,:
L
i_
connection
slower
on the
largest
indicated
The blades
angular
cast
deviation o£
that a better control
with the apparent
columnar
of grain k
problems
i the Molds
4. Molds
5 and 76 and
castings,
8. To the
correct
mold assembly
the was observed
redesigned with
to
i:_' eliminate the center downsprue below the pour-cup level, and to
_ provide an increased cross-sectional area of _unners and in-gates
both of these molds were packed with exothermic material and fur-
iii and Mold 8 (spiral
nace-ignited spoke)
at 1366°K were (the
(2000°F) fabricated in this as
same technique fashion,
used and
with
Molds 5 and 6). Molds 7 and 8 both required 8 minutes to ignite,
anu were left in the 1366°K (2000°F) furnace for the first 5
21
r
v
the blade-root down, these molds were cast with the blade-root up,.
and as anticipated, this change eliminated the platform shrinkage.
22
i
PRESSURESIDES
SUCTION SIDES
23
2-
.
_q
and (2) slow pouring of the molten metal into the molds resulting
in some loss of[ the neede_ superheat. Despite these problems, %
sufficient satisfactory directionally-solidified graln structures
were obtained in blades from Molds ii and 12 to permit machining
and testing of sound test speuimens.
8. Molds 13, i4 and 15. These molds were made from new waxes
of the preliminary uncooled blade design established in Task IV.
The waxes were designed with smoothly-transitioned extenslono of
both root and tip to permit the ca_ting of blades in eithe= root-
down or root-up positions. Figure 8 shows injected waxes for the
conventional- TFE731-2 blade and the wax for the preliminary
uncooled--5/FE731-3 blade design.
24
°
• . '__"
ill,
-=.,.
25
I-
SPOKE 4
SPOKE
STARTER
BLOCKS
TEST
BARS
26
'¥J
Molds 14 and 15 had the same design as Mold 13, including the I
27
!
V
-->_ atmosphere and the exothermic reaction to raise the mold face-coat
to a_temperature above the melting point.-of_the alloy to be cast.
k
This requires a reasonably uniform distribution of the exothermlc
28
An additional problem manifested--an occasional appearance i
of yellow particles on the mold surface caused by a metal-mold
reaction in local areas, and penetration of the mold by the molten k
alloy. Through chemical analysis, this problem was traced to a
zlnc-oxid_-impurity in the-iron ore used in manufacture of the
exothermic material. The supplier was able to eliminate this
problem by use of ore that did not contain zinc oxide ....
o Room-temperature tensile
29
. .. ._= t W • _
• i_
J4_
0,30 R
0.762
(0.300)
-
--
0.762
(0.300) c
-- 2.2k_
(0.90) _ J
DIMENSIONS IN CM (IN.)
3O
ira,-+. _ .,. -- p '
%.
- +_ 1 ,+++_
+ !+ +
i 2 3 4+ "+'_= 5
! *
; i
i
i ,
[
!
%
"++
0.048 R
(.0,189) 1.27
0.625 "_ /-" (o.5o)_-13 UNC '_-
(0.60)
'i.27 I (o.2so)j-_ I_
I • '-t- '1
.__ 2.22 3 18
(o.88) i - (12._
3.18
(1.26) - I
7,62
- (3.oo)
DIMENSIONSIN CM (IN,)
32
.....-
..... " "' 00000001- TSD(
'" ..+
33
+
_._
i
TABLE I, TASK I STRESS-RUPTURE TEST RESULTS ON DS CAST MACHINED-
i FROM-BLADE TEST sPECIMENS
_" [Test specimens machined from ex0the_mically cast DS MAR-M 247
! blades after heat treatment at 14940K (2230"F) for 2 hours and
_ I144°K (1600°F) for 20 hours.] \
! i l0
11 A
A 150.1
29.6 12.0
16.3 15.2
25.0
!_ - ii B 24.1 10.8 12.8 :
12 A 160.3 9.3 18.4
12 B 15.9 11.7 17.5
mE_
13 A 133.9 13.8 19..0
_., 13 B 179.3 16.8 18.6
14 A 137.3 17.4 24. i
14 B 130.7 15.2 28.9
_ \ 15 A 125.5 15.6 22.7
34
i
L
i
TABLE I. (CONCLDDED) un
35
TAIIL_: I|. TASK I STRF, RS-RUPT_E T_:ST RSSULT8 ON DS CAST S_['ARAT_SY ]
CAST TEST SI'ECIMF'N8 ,4
(Tost spoclmuns machlnod from oMothormlcnlly east DS MAP.-M 247
separately east test b_r, altar heat treatment at 1494"K
(2230eF) for 2 hours and ll44"K (1600"_') for 20 hourJ, k
-- i
TABLE llI. TASK I STRESS-RUPTURE TEST RES[_,TS ON CONVENTIONALLY
CAST EQUIAX_:D MAR-M 247 TEST SPECI_b_,NS
._ 20.3 10.1
10.5 18.9
15.3
36
4
•%
Ultimate
tensile 0.2-Percent Reduction
strength, yield strength,! Elongation, of area,
Mold Specimen MPa (kei) MPa (ksi) percent percent
I _T
37
TABLE IV. 4CONCLUDED)
- Ultimate
tensile 0.2-Percent Reduction
strength, yield strength, Elongation, of area,
Mold iSpecimen MPa (ksi) MPa (ksi) percent percent
• • • f i i
38
Ultimate
tensile O.2-Parcent Reduction
, strength, yield strength, Elongation, of area,
Mold MPa (ksi) MPa (ksi) percent percent
f_
(a) Tests at Room Temperature
39
"t {
i_ - tensile tests results for the MFB mind-bar and SCTB test speci-
! ; cracks in bars
cast test these from-Molds
molds, some
14 of
and the
15. test
Due bars did no_
to metal fill
leakage com-
from
i'_ pletely and the available bars were used for the stress-rupture
i tests.
4O
i
m
ooooo oo ooooo _
m
i ooooooooooo_
O0
41
i
L
0.625 inch) cylindrical starter extension, blade-root up. The
._ starter extensions were vertically oriented on a wax-covered alum-
inum plate. The plate initially served as a frame in mold dipping
operations, and subsequently as a base plate to form the flat- r
plane bottom surface and the base flange of the open-bottom final
ii DS mold. The blades in each spoke were oriented with their roots
parallel to each other and perpendicular to the mold spoke axis.
A short "riser" extension on top of each blade root was attached
, to a common 1.27-cm by 1.27-cm (0.5-inch by 0.5-inch) cross-
section horizontal runner for each spoke. Each runner was con-
nected to the central pour cup by an inverted-"Y"-shaped down-
gate. An approximate 3.8-cm (l.5-inch) unobstructed space was
left in the center of the assembly under the pour cup, as well as,
the space surrounding each 4-blade spoke, to provide open areas
for packing of exothermic briquets.
I
Mold manufacture. The wax assembly was then dipped with the
Colal-P alumina-flour prime coat, followed by sufficient silicon-
_ bonded alumina-silicate back-up dips to produce a 0.635- to 0.825-
ing,(0.250-
cm the mold was fired
to 0.325-inch) inshell
a gasthickness.
furnace tc After
produce the completed
autoclave dewax-
i open-bot_Qm DS mold as shown in Figure 13.
42
63
thzough the wall of the sleeve to provide a reference surface for
optical temperature measurements after firing. Suff.icien_ exo-
thermic briquets were poured into the insulatin_ sleeve around the
central open-area of the mold and around all the blade clu_ters to
at least 10-cm (a-inches) above the top runner ot the gating sys-
tem. Approximately 23 kg (50 pounds) of briquets were required.
The preheated mold assembly was removed from the furnace and
the support plate was_ removed. After checking the temperature,
the mold was_ transferred into the casting furnace and placed on a
grooved, water-cooled copper chill, which had previously been
covered with a single layer of nickel foil.
The valve between the two chambers was opened, and the mold
was poured at a molten metal temperature of 195 ° to 220°K (350 ° to
40@°F). above the liquidus temperature of the alloy. The pouring
took place approximately 25 minutes after the start of the preheat
cycle. The metal cast was held in place under vacuum on the chill
for 5 minutes, after which it was removed from the chamber for air
cooling prior to shakeout.
44
; TASK II - ALLOY/PROCESS. SELECTION
i._', Scope
i--"
! . AS was the case with Task I, the Task II activity was accom-
plished with the aid of Jetshapes, Inc. "
i
per mold were cast, one for each of the four alloys. The blade
45
00000001 TSEO
Figure 14 ....
Wax Pattern Assembly for Exothermic DS Casting Twenty
Task II Preliminary Design TFE731-3 Turbine BlaOes
46
A second group of feur molds, one for each alloy, was cast
using the same process controls and a second lot of exothermic
material. Grain etching of the castings made in this group
revealed significantly poorer grain orientation on all four
alloys, the probable cause being inadequate heat input from the
exothermic material. All remaining exothermic material from the
i suspect batch was retl)rn_d to the su_pller and exothermic mate-
+ rial of improved quality was procured for use in subseauent c_st-
• ings. The improved material had a m_nimum burn temperature of
47
+-
_J
3050"F, as required by the Detroit Diesel Allison EMS197A Speci-
fication. 4
#
_ i! XXVIII.
herein under Task II "Mechanical -Tests!' in Tables XV through
I
L i'
! Evaluation of the Task II mechanical property test data
48
Figure 15. Wax Pattern Assembly for Exothermic DS Casting
Six Task II Test Slabs
49
--- 51
referereod to the original nominal Z494°K (2230°F) nolutlen
treatment temperature: k
Zq
MAR-M 247 Room-temperature tensile and yield strengths
in mechanical properties.
stress-rupttlre lives.
+
+ i+
'%
Based on apperent superlcr r_.ults achieved with MAR-M 247
.... 52
D
mr
Metallurgical Evaluation
T
Noneestructlve Evaluti¢n (NDE). All Task II blade castings
i,_w_ were macroetched t® show grain orientation, X-rayed, and fluor-
escent-penetrant inspected.
m
m.
Grain etch of the blade castlnos from the first group of
four molds, revealed that all four alloys responded well to the
selected process control procedures. The MAR-M 247 and the NASA-
TRW-R produced the finest and straightest columnar grain pat-
terns. The IN 792+Hf train structure was somewhat coarser but
h
53
i! .
° .,_
'.
L:
(a) 1483°K (2210°F) (b) 1494°K (2230°F)
,.'.- '.__-..,,.. V. 2
. "! ,,,.. _.. "-4
54
(o) 1505°K (22500F)
(a) 1519°K (22750F)
?
.+__._,, ,
,<.
,
• , el ,¥I_ ' • II . ,.
" IP- t-#,, Ii i_ti i i ° i.
- i...-:.;_::.-...+,
iPiilt" . ." it. _") '"_'- Ii ill ia ,_-
55
I
_q
'%
+
i
Solution treatment
+ temperature,
°K (°F) Hours to rupture Number of tests
56
. 00000001-TSF
_ _ I,¸ ,._,l --I _ _
Yq
i__[ four alloys. This was caused by inadequate heat input f_om the
r : exothermic material. This inadequate heat inpu.t disturbed the
57
i i LBi
PRESSURE SIDE
SUCTION SIDE
58
d__
• ,,?
L;I ii11,.Ji
11 l
PRESSURE SIDE
i _
.
1 _
"Ļ_:'_ L.i
_
SUCTION SIDE
L
59
PRESSURE SIDE ....................................................................................
SUCTION SIDE
SUCTION StDE
H _ _ Q _ O
_ ,_!
" m _
2
N _ oom_ ooom _ooo om_
? _1 0
_ 0
i .
_!_T .¸_
_ T _._--_ .
7
Chemical analyses. Chemical analyses were made of castings
from all molds. The results of these analyses are shown in
i__ Tables XI through XIV. These tables also show the material
source master heat identification and certified chemical analyses
_ii:
I of the master heats.
63
I !
++'+'_++_L"_"_
_+¸' +..... _ r.
l=l I I I I i I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I ) I I l I l l l
0 O_ 0 ,'<
o ,90 o o o
+-' +
_ o o o o ,o , _.
0 0 O _ O
v _ v _ _.
._-- • .,,
._+ +0 ..+: +_ ,_
0 + ++,.,+
_, -- _
o o o+ '°"o _ __°°+°+_ o
I°
_-- _ _.
° " " ++ _+ _ _ _.1
+'-- .+.I
,.
e,-I
,,,
w.l e,,l ,-4
".-
.I_ e-_
_ oo!+.
++,+
0 E_
++,
,, o ,.. ,-
o o
•
_ °
+" P+ _
u_
+o---_
_ ++
0 + _ +, ,- _ ,, o
G G ": o ' <_ <_ ,G o "+,
o o
,"+ ,",
,.., _ "
.-., _ +
,..+ _ ,"
,-,
Ip
I l,_ I 1 I J
,m ..., A ,-3
M
64
L_
,d
V,
66
Ii Meohonlcal
re+t°
i. ??ests on Specimens Machined .f,
rom Blades.. A number of _'i
blades were selected from the first eigh_ Task II molds and
+ divided into two g_oups for heat t_eatment. The heat_ treatments
(summarized in Table VIII) used were as follows:
t :
- O0000001-TSGO:
D
, ,4
U1timate
a b te_s£1e O.2-Percent Roductlon
Spect_n oEaL_ Heat strength, yleld.strength, Elongation, of area,
number orle_tatlun _reatment MPa (ksL) MPa (ksl} percent percel_t
II I I
(b} _SA-TRW-R
(d} IH 792+Hf
aL = Longltudlnal T = Transverse
69
TkBLE _VI. 'CASK _ 1033"K (L400°F} TEHSILE TEST RESULTS _I
.- (Test epenlmene machined from exothe=mlcally cast DS p_elim£nary
design TFE731-3 turbine blades, Task %Z blade c_ting
Grou_s I and 2.) ,F
:: (b) NASA-TRW-R
a L = LongLtud_naL T _ Transverse
_ 70
TABLE XVII. TASK _X I033°K (1400°F) STRESS-RUPTURE TEST RESULTS - '_
LONGITUDI_L GRAIN ORIENTATION
_ MAR-M 247
62-1 A 79.9 10.6 18.1
62-7 A 12.4 14.0 19.0
62-12 B 55.7 Ii. 7 20.2
l
70-12 B 53.2 i0.0 28.9
=S NASA-TRW-R
IN 792+Hf
p!
64-5 A 23.7 9.3 _1.7
/ 71
TABLE XVIII. TASK II I033°K (1400°F) STRESS-RUPTURE TEST RESULTS -
TRANSVERSE GRAIN ORIENTATION
MAR-M 247 i
2N 792+Hf
64-5 A 655 (95) 12.4 6.3 26.5
72-4 A 621 (90) 23.4 6.0 9.7
64-14 B 655 (95) 10.3 4.3 10.9
72-10 B 621 (90) 28.1 4.3 13.5
72
TABLE XIX. TASK II 1255°K (1800°F) STRESS-RUPtURE TEST RESULTS -
LONGITUDINAL GRAIN ORIENTATION
• Hours Reduction
Specimen Heat a to Elongation, of area,
no. treatment rupture percent percent
_ MAR-M 247
NASA-TRW-R
MAR-M 200+Hf
IN 792+Hf
a
A = 1494°K (2230°¥) for 2 hours and 1144°K (1600°F) for 20 hours
B = 1494°K (2230°F) for 2 hours, 1255°K (I800°F) for 5 hours,
and 1144°K (1600°F) for 20 hours
73
I
± .q ,m ,
Reduction
: Specimen Heat a Stress Hours to Elongation, o_ area,
no. treatment MPa (ksi) rupture percent percent
MAR-M 247
NASA-TRW-R
, L,
i _4AR-M 200+Hf
IN 792+Hf
_ 74
¥
75
~.
_ : 76
TA_I_ XXZ, TASK ZX ROOM-TI_MP_RATURE T_NSI|,_ T_ST R_SULTS
Ultl_tQ 0.2-portent
A b tensile y£old Reduction
(poo£_un G_aln {_o_t st_enth, strength, _lon_tLon £n arrow
i
t 70-16
20-6 C
B 874
9?4 (127)
(141) 764
500 (114)
(I16) 13.4
15.9 24.3
29.2
[
62-11 B 1002 (145) 847 (123) 13.1 15,3
62-14c _ 9?4 (141) 614 (118) 6,7 14.6
62-16¢ B 972 (141) 630 (120) 6.0 13.5
' 113-12 D 1017 (148) 890 (129) 8.7 15.7
iJ 65-16¢
65-13c S
B 568
923 (140)
(134) 822
812 {119{
(i193 7.3
0.7 15._
16,4
73-2 D 995 (145) 872 (127) 13.1 15.5
_ a L - Longitudinal
T = Transverse
b B = 1494°K (2230°F) for 2 hours, plus 1255°K (1800°F) for 5 hours, and I144°K (1600cF)
for _0 hours_
C = 1483vK (2210_F) for 2 hours, plus _255°M (1900°F) for 5 hours, and I144°K (1600°F)
for 0 hours
D = 1505_K (22506F| £or _ ho_rs, plus 1255°K (1800°F) £or 5 ho_[S_ and 1144°_ (1690°F}
for 20 hours
MAR-M 200+Hf
IN 792+Hf
& L - Longitudinal
T = Transverse
b B = 1494°K (2230°F) for 2 hours, plus 1255°K (1800°F) for 5 hours, and i144°K (1600°F)
for _0 hours
C = 1485uK (22106F) for 2 hours, plus 1255°K (1800°F) for 5 hours, and 1144°K (1600°F)
for 28 hours.
78
d
MAR-M 247
MAR-M 200+Hf
NASA-TRW-R
- 79
¥
i
machlne._ _¢om Task ZZ exothermloally _est DS
tu_Sine bla,'-os having _est treatment no_ed be_ov,., _ _i
Hours ReduetiorL
5pecimen He_t a to Elongation, of area,
no. treatment rupture percent percent
',I
MAR-H 247
NASA-TRW-R
ZN 792+Hf
80
TABLE XXV. TASK Xl 1255°K (1800 _P) STRESS-RUPtURE T_ST RESULTS
; (Test specimens machined from Task II exothermically cast DS Mar-M 247
turbine blades solution-treated at 2 temperatures. Solution treatment
_i for 2 hours, follewed by inert _as quenching, then 1255OK (1800 °F) for
+ 5 houris, and I144_K (1600°P_ for 20 hours.)
a
L = Longitudinal
T = Transverse
81
r4,:%_
i
o++
2.-- Tests on Specimens Machined from Slabs. The eight slab .... 4
molds cast for Ta_k II cyellc-ruptu_e te_tlng_provlded for 6 rec-
tangular slabs De4 mold, with 2 molds cast per alloy. These k
slabs-were 15.24-cm high, 7.62-cm wide and 1.27-cm thick. (6
"- inches by 3 inches by 0.5 inch), and were heat treated using a _'
solution temperature of 1494°K_(2230_F) for+2 hours followed by
_+ inert o_s auenchlng,
+. I • a simmlated coating cycle at 1255°K (1800"F)
for 5 hours and aging at I146°K (1600°F) for 20 hours.
82
k
3.81 _,7.62 ,
(-1.51- '-I 0.95 - 17 UNC
5 ..,,._ 2:46 (0.375)
0.508 (0.172)
I (0.97) 0.452
0.95
(0.375)
I 0.317R
(0,251) 0.49S
(0.195)
2.46
(0.97)
0.636 NOTCH ROOT
(0.251) RADIUS
0.0'10
(0.006)
DIMENSIONS
IN CM
(INCHES)
'- 83
¥
|n
i'_ 5.hours,
by inert and
gas 1144°K (1600°F)
quenching, 1255TKfor(1800_F)
20 hours.]..
for
_. (Specimen 97)
I. NASA-TRW-R 300 i00 Failed on 400.0
84
TABLE XXVIII. _ASK II, 1033"E (1400eF) CYCLIC_RUPTURE TEST RESULTS FOR
TBR_E GRAIN ORIENTATIONS
(TeSt spoci_ens machLnad from exothe_icell-y cast D8 slabs. Prior to machining,
r_ slabs wer_ solutionrt_ated at 1494°K (2230°F) fox 2 hours followed by _nert qas
:_, quel_chlng, 1255"K (18000F) for hours, and 1_44°K (160O'F) for 20 hou¢=.
i
L: . Maxl_u_ Cycles Reduction
" " stress, HOurs tG to E1ongatlon, of are_,
___I_ Specl_en I Ozlentatio_ Type Qf sp_imen 14Pa (ksi') f&llu_a failure perc_t p_rcent
_ 65 T Smooth
i724 (105) 93.1 3045 4.0 8.1
66 T Smooth ?24 (105) 57,2 1891 4.6 8.5
_. 67 T Notched (K -I.6) 724 (105) 229.9 71_3
80 T Notched (K_-I. 8) 72_ (105) 231.8 7514
RAR-M 200+Nf
a L • Longitudinal
T m T_a_sve_se
I" 85
I
86
i¸ ,_
I _
was Cone o_ the MAB-M 24? and NASA-TRW-R alloys, as an oxtensive J
! productioo backgrollnd exists for t_e DS cast MAR-M 200+Hf alloy,
_ - and previous _ogram data resulted in elimination of IN 792+Hf a_ k
_,i a candidate mate_gal. A basic purpose of the cyclic_rupture
testing was to provide data useful in design of the firtree- .,
attachment _egion of the _u_blne blade where high stresses ale
_ present: at various orientations where stress-concentrations
L.. exist.
i
!_ (a) MAE-M 247.was notch-strengthened in all three orien-
_ tations.
(d) All three alloys were notch strengthened in- the 45-
deg_e_ orientation.
88
_ _I _ _ _
d
89
L ..... _ , ..
ik to 0.508 cm (0.200 inch) after 300 cycles oK the second "I
_ + test [1283°]< (I850°F)]. A second coating crack was
observed_ on the blade suct_en side, after+_500 cycles _
of t4_e second test. This crack bad grown to 0.076 cm
(_0.03 inch) at test completion.
(o) N_ASA-T_W-_
__are - One_very tight crack was observed at tes: COm-
.L
pletion.
_ Coate__...__dd
-. No cracks were observed.
:- Except for one blade, all of the coating cracks were located
at the trailing-edge platform intersection, which is a sharp
transition of thin,to-thick section that should generate maximum
'- thermal stresses. The sole exception was the coated MAR-M 200+Hf
_ blade that de_eiopea airfoil cracks. Figure 24 presents a typi-
Cal cal photograph of bare and coated MAR-M 247 blades before and
i_ / after testing.
_+- 90
2_
rJ
i̧•_ I_ i
.: COATED UNCOATED
e, • .
r
,..
COATED UNCOA r_D
I': c']c'les,
cycles. while the-DS
The two cast. blade;_
equia_..ed blade_ did not.
crackea A cr_cK the
duL'in0 ,_as se.':end
_,bservedi000
in
F Number _ -- -.....crack
• Ave_sge length, cm (inch)
[of C_cle.s Blade _O.--I-4"---- Blade No. 16
25 - - 0.05---(0.02)
50 - - 0.05 (0.02)
75 - - 0_08 (0.09)
l_q - - 0.08 (0.05)
200 - - 0.18 _0.07)
300 0.08 (0.03) 0.20 (0.08)
400 0.i0 (0.04) 0.20 (0.08)
500 0.10 (0.04) 0.20 (0.08)
700 0.18 (0.07) 0.20 (0.08)
,i000 .... 0.20 (0_08) ____ 0.20 (0.08 h
92
/
_ ........ q .....
i
• ¥
\ 93
%
i _¸ _.
--<
_=_
[
MAB=M 247 microstructu_es are presented
"
in. Figure 27 •
•+" Script carbides are evident in all _our p_]otos, and grain bound-
_ aries can-be seen in the as-cast structu:_es. The structure is
• th_ _as_nq proccss was 9r6at_r at the bZac_e tip, %hich was near
_-_ the chill--plate,
!_. "'.
[_--. + . 95
g2:
_ As a result of .the _ask II tests and e_alutions of the feur
_,. axloys, MARH4 247, MAN-M' 200+Hf, and NASA_TRW-R alloys were
_2 :'.
Ni:
°
+,,i
¥
I
ScQpe
k
During Task III, the three selected alloys, MAR-M 247, ............
!/ NASA-TRW-R, and MAR-M 200+Hf, were further evaluated in DS cast
form to determine and document mechanical and physica) properties
_" to v_k_date the final design for the turbine blades. This was
accomplished by the manufacture of additional turbine blade _nd
process
_i test bar castings by Jetshapes using controls developed
_i du_ing _asks I and II, _followed by comprehensive testing of cast- .....
atories.
ings and test specimens _ by AiResearch and independent labor-
" The blade molus we-re of the same design as those used in Task
If--five straight spokes with provisions for four root-up blades
in each spoke. The standard test bar mold had five spiral spokes
with six 1.590-cm (0.625-inch) test bars per spoke. In addition,
one test bar mold was made to provide both tapered erosion-test
i_ 3.8-cm (1.5-1nch) test bars, and another spiral spoke was replaced
102
i
castings.
separately cast test bars from all molds made in Task Ill.
Property Testing_
103
_" I_, _ .:_ l 1 _ , _, _!_1'_'_, ,-
R n
_ I07
¥
_J _m , u
TASLE XXXV. TASK 111 TEN_ZLE TEST RESULTS ON DS MAR-M 247 TUREIINE BLADES
UltL_at¢ 0.2-percent
a tensile yield Re_u_tlon
Spoclm_n Grain _emporaturo, strength: strength, Elongations in aIeu,
i;o. 2_rlentation _°K (oF) ------NPa(ksi) IIPa (ksl) ..L- perce_t percent
I_8-8 L Room 1100 (1601 885 (128) 5.9 12.5
Te_peratuEQ
128-1T
159-10T T .....
T 1 _3_--_,_120)
816 (118) 764 _.
_-7#_ (111)
(114) 9.5
9.8 14.5
14,6
a L = LongitudinaZ
T - T_anever_e
108
, ,2,,
_.. 1103 (1601
=Z 965 (1401
I I I I I | I
_. 96-3.11401
027112o)_: -
--- - 30 ,, ,, I
366 477 589 700 811 922 1033 1144
12001 14001 16001 18001 110001 112001 11400) 116001-
" TEMPERATURE, °K (OF)
_;_:'-. B, 0.2-PERCENT YIELD STRENGTI-!
_--_--
' .=
m- ""-NOTE: ALL SPECIMENSHEAT TREATED FOR:
_ ........ -...... 1505_K (2250°F1 FO,'t 2 HOURS,
..... "Pt.,_S 1255°K (1800°F1 FOR 5 HOURS,
-- PLU_>"%t4Q°k 11690°F1 FOR 20 HOURS
Figure 31, Tensi.1_--.,Properti¢:s Versus Temperature. of Lon_-_.tudinal
_ Specimens Machined from Task ITI. MAR-M 247
= .... -_ E:,Jothermically Cast DS Preliminary Design TFE731-.3
Turbine Blades (Sheet 1 oF. 2)
109
q
'¥
15.0 .....
z ..-------_----. %EL (A
s _
AVG.- 3
0 ...... I I '1'
366 477 589 71_0 dll 9122 10_3 11'44 :
(200) (400) (600) (800) (1000) (1200) (1400) (1600)
_:- TEMPERATURE, OK tOF)
C. ELONGATION t
_z lO.O
O
gJ 5.0 AVG.- 3o
/e- ....
: 0 I I i I I I I I
366 477 889 700 811 922 1033 1144
(200) (400) (600) (800) (1000) (1200) (1400) (1600)
, TEMPI_RATURE, OK (OF)
D. REDUCTION OF AREA
<
i 110
160,0 ---'
12o.o
i
100,0 VG. - 30
80,0
! I '1 I I " I I
- 366 477 589 700 811 922 1033 1144
(200) (400) (600) (800) (1000) (1200) (1400) (1600)
TEMPERATURE, OK (OF)
A. ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH
80.0
366 477 589 700 811 922 1033 1144
(200) (400) (600) (800) (1000) (1200) (1400) (1600)
TEMPERATURE, OK (°1_)
B. 0.2-PERCENT YIELD STRENGTH
NOTE: ALL SPEC(MENS HEAT TREATED FOR:
1505°K (2250°F) FOR 2 HOURS,
PLUS 1265°K (1800°F) FOR 6 HOUR,_,
PLUS 1144°K (1600°F} FOR 20 HOURS
iii
.....
: 15.0 "1 .... %
0
366 477 589
. 12001 . (4001 16001 (8001 110001 112001 114001 11600)
TEMPERATURE, OK l°F)
C. ELONGATION
•. 20.0 -I ""
-_ _ _RA1AVG.1
•, ._:__
15.o
10.0
°
'" 5.0 AVG.- ,
o
- 0 I ' I' i t I I l I
386 477 589 700 811 022 1033 1144
.... . :.._ 12001 (4001 16001 18001 110001 112001 114001 116001
i ': TEMPERATURE, OK (OF) ......
D. REDUCTION OF AREA
LII in Table XXXVI. Tensile and yield st_el%gths of the SCTB specimens _
were 0- to 10-percent lower than resalts.of the MFB minl-ba_ tests
and the SCTB specimen _esults exhibited 40- to 100-percent higher
TRW-R. The strengths of all three alloys were adequate for the final
Ii order of demonstrated st.reng_h--MAR-M 247, MAR-M 200+Hf, and NASA-
design turbine blades.
_: 113
v.
TABLE XXXVII. TASK llI TENSILE TEST RESULTS ON SEPARATELY CAST TEST B_HS OF DS NASA-TRW-H
__ Heat tceatment_ 1505aH (2250°F) for 2 hours wi_h argon quenching, plus
12554K [1800°F) for 5 boues w_th &It cooling, plus
_i_ I144°K (1600°F] foe 20 houes with air conl[ng
SJltlmate Q.2-percent
tensile yieJd Reduction
Specimen Grai_ Temper_turej strength_ strength, E_onga_io_, in area,
NO. orlentatlo_ °K C-F) MPa (ksi) MPa (ksi) percent p_rcen_
Speci_%ens machlne4 fr0m initial design TFE731-I turbine blades
168-5T
174-3T T
T I 858
837 [124)
[121} 839
832 [1_2]
(_2_) 4.0
3.2 8.6
?.2
168-6 5 i0_3 (14002 1028 (149) 867 [1282 13.4 24.1
174-4 L 1198 (I742 ]000 f145) 10.9 20.8
• " 1175
i146 L
5 1144 }
_16002 969
957 (14!)
(1392 721
710 (I05)
(I03| i 16,7
19.5 24.2
24.4
a L " Longitudinal
• T " TE altsv_rse
I15
TABLE "': ;VIIi. 1lear TASK 111 "F_NRILE
treatment= TE_q 12250°F1
1%05°K _ESU[.T_ ON SEPARAI'_I.Y
for 2 houzs with CAST _EST auenchinq,
arqo,_ PARF _F D_r.l*,F
HA_-M _0t?41-f
1255°K (1800_P) for 5 h_ur_ wi_h _lr on.liner nl_*_
U1tim3_o 0.2-percent
• , R tensile yiel;l Reduction
Elon_aLion, in .tg..,le
Specimen (._axn "l'eN)e rl_l.lure
1 _ t_enqth strength,
_"" NO. Orientation HPa (kSi} ,t'a (k_') , perc,,_ |,_rceltt
• R52
1181
L
L
1 1098
!088
(1591
11581
836
851
_1211
(1241
9.2
9.9
10._
11,8
l _; R82
R54 L
h 10l $ _
.(1400) _224
120"_ 1178)
1175) 973
985 11411
1143t 9.7
7.5 16.3
13.0
a L = Lo;,giLud;ndl
|:
i:: zz6
III
TABLE XXXZX. TASR'I_I STRESS-RUPTURE TEST RESULTS ON MAP-M 247
TEST SPECIMENS
Heat treatment= 1505OK (2250=F) fo_ 2 hours wlth argon quenching, plus
....
_L'est specimens
1255°K
I144°K
maohined
(1800°F)
(1600°F)
from
for
for
5 hours• with slr cooling,
20 hours with air cooling
exothermically cast
plus
preliminary
I
desipn TFE731-3 turbine blades.)l Reduc- -
_pecimen Grain a Temperature, l Stress, Hours
to Elongation, oftion
area,
No. orientation °K (_F) I MPa (ksi) rupture percent percent ]
I m
a L = Longltudlnal
T = Transverse
117
F :web
I_i
I'ADLE XL. TASK 111 STRESS-RUFTURE TL:ST RESULTS ON MAR--N 2006H£ AND
NASA-TRW-N
Heat troatmentl 1505°K (2250=F) Eor 2 hours with argon Quenching, plllS
__ : Nu,ber Grain orie,,tatio, a "K ('P) HPa (k,,)_upture ' percent percen,: t
- MAR-M 200+Hf
,.
NASA-TRW-R
I' 186-12
167-10T
186-12T
T _ Transverse
L
T
1-31
126
L72
(19)
(27)
(25)
832.8
65.?
|_=.9
22.0
3,?
7.8
51.q
5.6
t4.4
i a L • [_ongtt_dinal
• TASK III DATA - 1144°K (1600°F) AND 1255°K (1800°F)
... 483(70)
,_i 414(60). •
_,.... m 276(40) ,_
i.- IN-100 _ _/'/'- ,LbS B- 47
_ 20713.0)
1144°K 1
(1600°F) (1700OF) ._ 1255°K
(1800°F)
""
_, 69(lO,
40 42 44 46
41,1
48
,lit
50
462 54
_ LARSON-MILLER PARAMETER, P*
i
*P = T (20 + LOG t) x 10-3
!" WHERE:
Equiaxed
P = LARSON-MILLER PARAMETER
T = TEMPERATURE, °RANKINE
t = TEST TIME
IN100,
IN HOURS
i19
Figure 33. Average Stress-Rupttlre Strength of DS MAR-M 247 Versus
_i_" :
!,
4
the _et_lol li44°K (160O°F} and 1255°K (1800°F} Task III data
polnt_. The h hJher strength leveln achieved in Task lIT are
attributed to the _ncreased solution temperature, 1505°K versus
1494°K (2250°F versus 2330°F}, use_ on the Task IIl eastir_s .......
Using the Task Ill MAR-M 247 rupture and uree_ test _ata, a
family _f _upture and creep curves were prepare@ b), reare_ion
analy._s using a least sauares Inethod. The curves were plotted as
average aDO minus three sigma curves. These curves _re presented
in Figures 34 through 37 for rupture, (0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-percent--
creep, respectively). These curves were utilized to validate the
final blade _esign life predictions. The acceptability point for
the DS MAR-M _47 specification is shown on Ficure 34.
120
,+.
• 00000002-TSC14
689(100) *
414(601 _G,
r,_
,P 276(40)
652(80) _AV ' k
3E AVG. - 30 " _k.
138(201
I
69(10) , , , I I"
37 30 4_ 4_ 46 47 ;9 6_ 6_
LARSON-MILLER PARAMETER, P = [T(OF.)_r460](20+Log t) x 10.3
4141601 AVG.
¢n AVG. - 3o _-
276(40)
cd
_,)
uJ
¢ 1381201
69(',0) , , , , , , ,
34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 56
LARSON-MILLER PARAMETER, P = [T(°F)-N60](20+Log t) x 10-3
414(6ol
] AvG.
_' 276(40)
AVG. - 30
138120)
"_ 2761401
=- AVG..- 3(;
69(101 .... , =, _, L, = , , ,
36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
LARSON-MILLE_ PARAMETER. P = [T(°F)+460J(20+Log t) x 10-3
--: Figure 37. Larson-Miller 2.0-Percent Creep Curve for DS MAR-M 247,
Longitudinal Data, 0.178-cm (0.070-Tnch) MFB Test
3pecimens
122
D L
--+W
Specimen
No. Te_;_oreJ
°K ('P) I
l _tPa
atress,
(ksl) Cyoles
failureto a I Remark_ .....
._ •
_. 123
K +' ,+t t
.,_
I
_ TABLE XLII. LOW-CYCLE-FATIGUE TEST RESULTS ON DS MAR-M 247
_+ Maximum Cycles a
[_ ',:._cimen Temperature, stress, to
Humber °K (oF) MPa (ksi) failure Remarks I
,i'i
250
249 i172
1172 (170)
(170) 4,870
4,260
6 1138 (165) 5,070
244 1138 (165) 5,960
245 i103 (160) 6,530
246 1103 (160) 7,260
_,; 5 1034 (150) 4,210
_';- 124
vI
125
iţ
is cast.t_at ba_s.)
M24
M23 1172
1138 (170)
(165) 4.600
5,400
z_
k 2(_
127
The I033°K (1400°F) LCF data on MAR-M 247 and iN100 is pre-
sented as least sgu_res'regression analysis curves in Figures 38 .
through 41. In all cases, the upper curve is the best fit of the
data, and the lower curve is the best fit minus three sigma. %+ +
128
I
11031160 -
IE 827(120) ................
_:; _ BEST FIT MINUS
r,_
ua THREE SIGMA., _
2761401 _ I _, !
100 1000 10,000 100,000
CYCLES TO FAILURE
Figure 38. Low-Cycle Fatigue of Exothermically Cast DS MAR-M 247.
[Longitudinal. Data, 1035=K (1400°F), Load Controlled, _
A = 1.0, Kt = 1.0, Smooth• Uncoated Test Specimens
Machined from Sep_@_rately Cast Test Bars]
1655(240)
: BEST FIT OF
I ACTUAL DATA
r"
8271120-
_
_, 552(80
1379(200 "'
• B
0 I, I,
100 1000 10,000 100,0O0
• CYCLES TO FAILURE
• Figure 39. Low-Cyqle Fatigue of Exothermically Cast DS MAR-M 247.
[Longitudinal Data, 1033°K (1400°F), Load Controlled,
;, A = 1.0, Kt = 1.8, Notched Uncoated Test Specimens
; 129
r ,_,?"
_,, 1055(240) -
_ • /'-- BEST FIT OF
- 1379(200) DATA
_ 11o3,1oo)
-
Ii _ 927(12o)
-
552180) ' t
1103(1601
..,. F
_ _' ,52(so,
BEST
THREEF,TM,"O___j"
SIGMA "
276(40)
0 I I
100 1000 10,000 100 )00
CYCLES TO FAILURE
130
m
[0.64-_m (O.25-inQh) Lcet specim ,-_. machined from eaparatoly _a|t t0ut bara.]
Atc_rn_inq
atreIIe CyC1o_
con_£guratton MPa (kel) to £allu_o Remarks
altern&t_
131
_'-_, " TABLE XLVZ_. HIGh-CYClE-FATIGUE TEST RESULTS ON RT-21 COA_D DS MAR-M 247
i "" 10.64-Cm 10.25-1noh) test sp.clmens maohined "from separately hast test bars.}
A1ternat_ng
179
I',- 379 (55) 125,000
_i 16 414 (60) 293.000 Broke _n threaded area
_-
_ '
_ 132
J TABLE XLVIII. XIGH-CYCLE-FATIGUE TEST RESULTS ON DS MAR-M 247
(0.64-cm (0.25-1nob) test speolmons ma=htnQd from separately cast tQlt bars.]
a Alter_atln_
Specimen
H.mh._ Configu_atlon A
Ratio T_KPera
.= urB
(_F) MPa8tress,
(ksi) to Cycles
failur_ ... R_mark_
i i 154
129-1 b 689
621 (i00)
(80) 176,000
3?8,000
133
134
.+
%,
Estimated _
endurance limit
J
at 10 7 Cycles,
Temperature, Notched Coated
_i_.oy °K (oF) specimen specimen MPa (ksi)
R_sults at A = _
Results at A = 0.q5
136
._mh
d,
J
:h
i " Static modulus of elasticity was determined from the Task III
_ tensile test data. The static moduli are presented in Table LII
and compared to the dynamic moduli determined by Southern Research
" Institute in Task II on the same DS alloys. Results of the two
-__ methods of measurement generally agree at room temperature, but not
_ at elevated temperatures.
i
!L
.... The test rig design is described in the following paragraphs,
i=_,. and is shown schematically in Figure 44 and in the photos of
o Automatic
points, in burner
addition cycling between
to controlled two temperature
automatic cycling set
to
room temperature by airblast.
" 137
20
" i 15
' _ " 55
i
o_ oo1
!
i
i' b, NASA-TRW-R
[ Figure 42. Thermal Expansion of Exothermlc_lly Cast DS MAR-M 247
and NASA-TRW-R
_ r 138
!
r
LL ....... • - ._ .
k
1A0(250) '"
1.12(200)
_0.56(100)
o.84115o)
_0.281501 -
_ 0 ' ''
0 , 0%120001
1366
_ 1.401250)
_ 1.1212001
>--0.84(1501
_ 0.6611001 '
-I
0.28150)
u,.I
"r'
I-
0 I I I I I I | I I
367 478 589 700 811 822 1033 1144 1256 1306
(200) (400) (600) 18001 11000) 112001 114001 116001 118001 120001
TEMPERATURE, OK (OF)
b. NASA-TRW-R
Figure 43. Thermal Conductivity E,_othermlcally Cast DS MAR-M 247
and NASA- TRW-R
- 139
q
ACTUATOR CONTROL I
'_ NOZZLE
IGNITION QUENCH ! _ MOTOR
fr RADIATION
OVERTEM- PYROMETER ..............................
PERATURE
SHUTC SHUTOFF [_
!i ILTER CONTROL
-'_ CONTROLLER-
RECORDER
FUEL FLOW
CONTROL VALVE
•: TIME
TEST TIME
ONE TIME
TWO
t
Pig_re 44, Sohematic of AiResearch Oxidation
Hot-Corrosion Burner Rig
141
TEST FACILITY CONTROLS ....................
• 142
_-+ o Controlled addition of aqueous sea salt solutions, sul-
_ fur, or any other desired contaminant to the burner
._r flame.
test, MAR-M 247+ showed very little attack,• while the coatings
failed at areas of lower temperature on the MAR-M 200+Hf and
NASA-TRW-R alloys as shown in Figure 46 ....................................................
i .... Micro-Met
examination Laboratories
was performed of onLafayette,
three Indiana,
high-rupture-timemetallographic
MAR-M 247
stress-rupture specimens. The basic stress-rupture test history
(refer to Table XXXIX) was as shown in Table LV:
143
+
T
L
D- ,I
Fuel
l_-i Salt Added to the Combustion Products of Jet-A
i "'" 146
"
k,r TABLE----LV' BASIC STRESS--RDPTDRE TEST HISTORY
)
cated by Figure 48.
147
m,
(MAG.: 500X)
148
L V
(MAG.: IOOX)
149
=,. . •
t_
(MAG.: lO00X)
__ ,
(MAX.: IO00X)
151
4a
d.,¸
152
!'
(MAG.: 2000X)
(MAG.: 3000X)
153
O0000002-TSFO
vI
.I
". q
Scope k
!iminary design blades cast in each of the four alloys during the
_ _-- performance of Tasks I, If, and III were used in establishing the
final blade design. The geometry of this design made it neces-
sary to modify the turbine disk, nozzle, and other turbine com-
_ the blade into the engine assembly. The redesign of these tur-
154
i [-
i
"i
E,
q
_,, Preliminary Design - High-Pressure TurBine (HPT) Blade
i " !
i, Vector diagram, _he flow path-used for the preliminary
':: blade design was the same as the existing TFE731 Engine with the
_ 155
L ,"i
_
V
J
ii
156
[
i:, WHERE,: STATION 1 IS STATOR V = ABSOLUTE VELOCITY
EXIT PLANE
W = RELATIVE VELOCITY
U1 U2 __
158
-. 159
R = 10.80 CM (4.24 IN.)
162
L;.
I': A 2_
1'5 F
12C
: _i.
_ io(
Z
Z
_W 2c
Ig
I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100
PERCENT AXIAL CHORD
163
Tile blade geometry of the hub and tip is shown in Figure 55 1
and 56, respectively. Figure 57 shows the stack with the blaoe _i
cente_of gravity as the stacking axis illustrating the low-t_i_t _
(14 degrees, 17 minutes) feature q£ this design. _k
164
T
9*
: 165
L
:r-
i " stresses are shown in Figure 61. Using the calculated stresses
! "-- and a_erage metal temperature of the uncoated blade as shown in
Table LIX.
_"
• TABLE LIX. CALCULATED STRESS-RUPTURE LIFE SHOWING
I_. CRITICAL SECTION AT TAKEOFF CONDITIONS
ii .... Normalized'-
: Calculated Stress-
'i 11.94
11.43 (4.70)
(4.50) 175.8
199.9 (25.5}
(29.0) 1215
1208 (1727)
(1714) 1.64
1.03
12.19 (4.80) 162.0 (23.5) 1215 (1727) 2.74
i[ : 166
d
27_(4G
207(3_
13812(
0
HUB RADIUS TIP
1255
¢" (tSOO) "-
(l?oo)
116001
_B55
(15oo) "
HUB RADIUS TIP
167
, ±,l
B ',¸¸ , '_
km _
_ 621190).
552(80) %
483(70) -
,i 414160)
3451503 'i
r_ L"
276(40)
" _
- . _ 2071301
7"
_ Ji"
. < .-
_ 1381201
691101
-- 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
; . I£S
Final Design - High-Pressure Turbine Blade
As in all turbine blade designs, the final design was the result _7
il_ of m_ny interactions and tradeoffs between aerodynamics, metal
Mach numbers and the flow angles at the stator inlet and exit.
i 169
1-'/0
JO,,
J
V
A UaBINNN HOVIN "IV-'_I.LLUO
P o o o o o
I t l I 0
\ _
°
"_
- \
1 "
_
ul
\ 1 o _i
\ °
I,- ",I_\ g_
'_°
i H ii, _
171
.. •i
ip
40
_,,. ,,V/M 1::t::ISIAINN
H3VlAI "IVDIJ.lUO -=IAI.LV3=IU
O 0 0
I I..... I I ,.l ®
_, \
;: ,7
[-
g
&
8
I
o
I I,,, ! I ii •
1"/2
-
B0,
R_AGTI_N " _2
_.. ! 20
lr
1 --
0.93
1
T"
• T'INLE T J
0.92 , ,
0.91
[i HUB TIP
RADIUS AT ROTOR INLET
10;20°- 151_ _i
./ ,_ _- I MEAN
"-
_ -- R 12.4 CM 14,9 IN,)
1,9°
.,._ ._.
57"80- f
__
243 M/SEC
74_/_?_.
"_'_;
0
-_!- 165
M,S_C
j ,_, ""
i- Figure 68. Velocity
@/
Triangles of the Final Design
7 _7,
i '
i
0. 0.25(0.10) 0.5(0.20)
CM (IN.)
176
I I •- I
0 0.25(@.10) 0.6(0.20)
,,= CM (IN.) ..........
0 0.25(0.10) 0.5(0.20)
CM (IN_)
178
¥
1,0
HUB TIP -
RADIUS
179
I_
_0
w !
p-
0,60
0.40
0.2O-
_J
= o J. I-. . , I I ,.,
2O--- 40 W $0 _0
PERCENTAXtAI. CHORD
Figure 75 ......
Rotor Hub SecEion-Loading [R = i0.77 cm
(4.24 inches) ] of the-F_inal Design
180
++
!r
.... _ _.o©
0_c
i :"
!
i °- O2O
:? .T AX,AL
C.
Rotor 12.3
! Figure 76. Mean Seetion Loading
(4.87 inches)] of the Y_nal Design
t
i
,If /,
Figure,,. _ t_ _ip:i;;_;;L_F_ga t RDislg4 n 16 c'm
181
k- ........... _J ....
I
¥
inlet and the exi_ blade angles, _l and _lmust be minimized. The
small radial variation of _I is obta/ned by-
182
7
....... L............... L"=..... ,; - "
2.- Blade-GeometrY, Three cylindrical des/gn sections are
/_° used-at the following radii to define this blade.'
The inlet and exit conditions are- obtained- from the vector
The blade geometry data fo_ these three design sections are
given in Table LX. The three design sections are- shown in
C- Eigu_-es--70,_71 and 72-- The_ area_distribution for plane sections
is shown-hn Figure 7L3 and the trailing-edge blockage is shown in__
"" Figur_ 74.
183
T
I _. a minor deceleration.
ii.
" The relative critical Mach number is subsonic everywhere.
Consequently, the high wedge angle and high turning as well as
_= the higher th/ckness at' the trailing edge ha_e no adverse effects
_7
on _he loading_ The. resulting high turning contributes to a
- hligher loading in the rear portion, resulting in a nearly con-
,i_ stant suction surface velocity near the trailing edge for the tip
section.
184
. . J
i
Thermal-.Analysis.- The metal temperatures of, an uncooled ....
, I
turbin_ blade are pzimarily_jdependent upon--the temperature of_-the k _,
gas s_ream re/ative, to the bla_e (TB)_,_ Conduction into the _i
185
! 186
_.
: II
!
1
i
• I
I
I
187
i TEMPERATURE, °F.
188
qt
I/I
189
f_ o!
The-nominal-blade centrifugal stresses are based _n the fol- "J
Iowiag equation.
g = Gravitational constant.
L90
L
q
J
191
Figure 83. Final MATE Blade Airfoil Design
193
Figure 84. Final Blade Design -- Airfoil,
-- Platform, and Shank
194
|
i-
v -
i - 195
_' _
i;
I
[
"-_.... \
196
•. Figure 87. Suction Side Stresses (KSI) and Deflections
.... at 29,692 RPM
- 197
L+
0
HUB TIP
RADIUS
198
¥i
r_
DEFORMA.T.LO_ MAGNIFIED
199
liB" ._
I , \_SECT,;SECT,ON
A
_-_SEC_'ION. C
: (TOP OF FIRTREE)
" - t
65
8
_ _i_, . 5
1-. SECTION 1 ......
SEGTION 3
i .
!:
";J{
i
t,
SECTION 2 SECTION 4
2(10
*f
I
i
46
SECTION C
201
OPERATING .....
ENGINE
RANGE ___ 52/R EV
2X- NOZZLE
' VANES
_ 24 PE_
1ST COMPLEX
2O
N
2;
2ND TORSION
3 TM
i: • _J 26/REV
i._
'i _ 12 1ST TC,RSION NOZZLEvANES
l, n-
2O2
• i
203
,- [
=
TABLE LXII. 26-VANE-'TEE731"" HIGH-PRESSURE TURBINE STATOR -
INTEGRATED THROAT •AREA--VS. ETAGGER
k
- Integrated- throat area
_s - (_) Design, between R = 10.985 cm (4.335 in._
de_rees and 14.07 cm (5.54 in.), cm (in._)
0 87.132 (13.521)
" 205
¥_
I •
:: _
" _.1
O.U
•_ r_
- _
M
t_
N
- r
206
J
R=11cm (4.324
207
E
' ' I '' IS I
1.0Q "j " -- __ T
+::
-:
i
+
0,4_
0,00
0.,2C
Figure 96.
40
PERCENT
Stator
AXIAL
Hub
P.L0,
CHORO
Section Loading
t
I_0
1.00 ......
-+_ -.
im+o+::!O.l+
00 _0+
PERCENT
40
AXIAl, GHORD
g0 00 ,0
Figure 97. Stator Tip Section Loading
,,+
- 208
I
!
,IJ
°*,q
U
-_ o
_0
_m
iI)
o'1
2].0
is to ¢onstruc_ the new _ane and--subject it to comprebensi$e
_: testing and evaluation. ._able LXIII-.shows the-result of the
parametric study between the new vane (26/nozzle), and the stand- %
ard-TFE731-3 vane ($6/nozzle). As can be seen in this Cable, the
new cooled 26=vane design compares favorably with the cooled pro-
duction vane.
5
212
F
213
L
/
) t
3O733
:, :t
I
2E-VANE
LOW TWIST
$TATOR
3072724-1 )S
BLADE
3072746-1
3072411-1
3072748-1
Scope
"%
Blade Manufacture
217
•2 _
•_ 218
• ~
J , r 1....
219
L
ill
:
----.......................
were__In hour-s: 77.7-, 17_9, I00_ 119.9, _84.7--anti 99.6.--Based-on
Task. I.II_daJ_,__ the_expected average life- of these- blades was
! approx/m_tely i00 hours_- The-ac.tual average __est llfe of the six
Task V specimens-was 93.3-hours_ In-Task I, the .average life of .k
similar test specimens machined from preliminary design blades and
." _.e_ted under the.same test conditions was 79.6 hours_ Thus,. t-he
_ Task -V-final design, blades, _wi_h the.lmp_.r_oved heat treatment- and
: - ref_i.neclhasting proc_ess, exhibited a 4Nin-imum .life-- equal .to or
- g:reater than the average life of blades produced earlier in the ,
program_
220
(a) (MAG.: 1X) (b) (MAG.:..100X)
221
, +
"
5.- Blade finishin___All MAR-M 2-47 and MAR-_ 200+Hf cast-
ir_a_wer.e solution.heat _reate_ i_a vacuum at L505°K _2250°F) for
two hour_s, followed-b Z inert gas quenching. The blades wex.e then
: fi_ish_machine_ t_ the final design confi@uration--estahLished in
%
Task IV. _igure 108 shows a typical MA/_-M- 247 blade as-cast and J
after finish machining. The pressure and suction-_sides-ol two
.. finishe_ blades are shown in Figure 109. After machining, all
blades were coated with the RT-21-_aluminide coating at 1255°K
(1800°F) fop 5 hours, followed by air-cooling, then aged for 20
hours at 1144°K (1600_F) and followed hy air-coDling.
222
t
223
I
#'i
f
i,
I,
r
1
._._'._
si ' '71"
Figure IC9. Pressure and Suction Sides of TWo
Finish-Machined Exothermically Cast
DS TFE731-3 Final Design Blades
224
TABLE L IV. SUMMARY OF THE YIELD OE THE FINAL DESIGN
DI/IECTiONALLY-SGLIDIFIED TFE731-3
TURBINE BLADES CAST--IN TASK V--
Alloy_
i
!, MAR-M
247 i 200+-_f
MARCM I NASA-TRW-
R ,rT?tal
225
i
.F
%
Special Engine Components Manufacture _i
226
TABLE LXV. SPECIAL_HIGH-PRESSURE TURBINE HARDWARE-
MA_OFAC_URED EOR TPE731_3 ENGINE TEST
OF EXOTHERMICALLY CA_T DS HIGH_PR_SSURE k
T//RBINE BLADES
227
__._......_._.._ 4• rl. •_. _e-7 *_'•_'Lr_ _ _ḑJ•;, _
Im •_ vi
228
%,,
Engine Weight
/'
Manufacturing Costs ,_
229
T "
o Savings achleve_.by__op_imizing the engine cycle param- '_
J
k ;
D/rect Costs - The uncooled (solid) DS castings are higher _,,
yield, less expansive castings that. requime leas machining than
J
the conventional cooled. (cored) TFE731-3 HP turbine blades.
Figure 110 shows a relative cost comparison between the conven-
_ tional cooled INI00 HPT blade used in tha-TFE731-3 Engine and the
" MATE DS_blade designed in this projeqt for the TFE731 Engine. The ' i
ii
changes in configuration and processing will yield a-l.5-percent
engine manufacturing cost savings for production quantities. By
ii_ redesigning
MAR-M 247 DS the
blade HP turbinein
material disk rimto area
the utilize
and the stronger a
Incorporating
stronger disk material (such as Rene' 95), a 23-percent weight
earrings can be realized_ Tkls weight/cost savings is offset, how-
ever, by a 41-percent increase in raw material cost which results
230
100 COATING
_ROCESSING
O AND
80 INSPECTION
n.
"r" ,
6O MACHINING i !
Z COATING _
C3
uJ
=J
O MACHINING
O 40
¢J
C/_TING
20 CASTING....
r_
uJ
0
PRODUCTION MATE DS
TFE731-3 TFE731
HPT BLADE HPT BLADE
(COOLED IN100) . (SOLID MAR-M 247)
231
• °
• i
TABLE LXVI. CHANGES IN ENGINE PARAME_'ERS FOR CONSTANT
CRUISE THRUST TO FULLY UTILIZE TEE DS
TURBINE BLA_)ES IN THE TFET-II-3
WF
_._ _ W_
W_C _
I 1 . B_Rnew
BPR_aseline )
232
.......
- " -- -- " 00000003-TSE[
A
Total Costs - Adding the cost savings due to cycle optimiza .......
tion (1.3 percent) to the direct manufacturing cost savings previ-
ously discussed (1.9 per_cent), yields a total engine manufacturing
cost reduction of at least 3.2-percent.
"T
233
I_•__ . . _ "*
'_,
!: The change in engine file (TBO} and--the resultant-effect in
1 a
cost can_ be deter.mine_ by using an- engine overhaul cost model that
may be expressed_ as _.composite toE-the entlre--engine._---_he-basic %
L
._ model for-engine over_%aul cost (EOC) is"
\M?.Bo +_ LB_Cj
Module(BMOC_
where:
t
-- :
BMMC .... Baseline module manufacturing cost
_" an engine repair cost model. The basic model for engine repair
i. cost {ERC) is:
. 234
! "'_
Baseline-Maintenance Cost*
! if _MMC = 0"*
x 01]
ERC-= $_3! X ]N6
235
- . , •
EOC = $2964 X 106 'k
Revlse-d-/_aintenance Costs --
iz
= 7.5 Percent
_ 236
1
CONCLUSIONS ...... _i
237
v!
238
........... L __ -- _ L
"IV
i
Maintenance costs of a TFE731-3 Engine wi_h solid DS MAR-M
247 HP turbine blades would be reduced 7.5 pgrcent due to greater
i blade durability, exceeding _he Project 1 goal of 6.2 pezcent.
239
, ..... , t --
¥
_I_ECED|I_IG
p_GEBLA_, I_OTFluMf-(_
APRENDIX A
241
-F
'.4
il
APPENDIX A-
MAR-M 247 MATERIALS SPE_IPZCATZON
EMS52300 Classification and Znspec- 3.5.3 Separately cast test bars ihall be
tion of Castings _ cast into the same. type of refracJ_orMmold
as the castings for which the master heat
EMS52330 Masten Heat Preparation of is _o be used.
3.1 Composition Su@_estedAim Range 3.7.1 Cast parts shall be heat treated for
20 hours at 1600*F.
Carbon 0.15 0.13-0.17
Chromium 8.25 8.00-8.8_ 3.8 Cash'partS after heat treat shell have
Molybdenum 0.70 0.80-0.80 a hardness of NRC 30-40.
Tantalum- 3.00 2.80-3.30
Aluminum 5.50 5.30-5.70 4. PROCESS CONTROL
Titanium 1.SO 0.90-Zo20
Hafnium 1.50 1.20-1.60 4.1 Castings sha_l be cleaned in accordance
Boro_ 0.015 0.01-0.02 withA±Research Specification C5041 as
sir_onlur_ 0.05 0.03-0.08 required.
_obalt 10,00 9.00-1_.O0.-
Tungsten 10.0O 9_0-i0.50- 4 _2 He_t treatment shall follow al_ other
Manganese -- 0,20 Max_ thermal exposure_e.g., coating and brazing
Sulfur -- 0.015 Max. operations, which may occur during processin,
silicon -- 0.20 Ma_. of parts.
IrOn 0.50 Max_
Nickel Ee_alnder Remainder 5. INSPECT/ON
3.1.1 Trace elements shall be controlled in 5.1 All castings shall be visually, pens-
accordance with AMS 2280, Class 2. trent-, and E-ray-inspe_ted in accordance
wi_h _52300.
3.2 Production of master heats, remslting of
master heats and pouring of castings shall be 5.2 The supplier shell perform all testing
accomplished under vacuum, for cen£ermanee to chemloal limits.
3.3 A master heat shall be made from EMS52330,§.3 The supplier shall perform all
Class I material, mechanical-_foperty testing.
3.8.1 When specified, a _aster heat n_y be 5.3.1 Test specimens shall be heat treated
made from Class 111 materlal_ for 20 hours at 1600"F prior to testing.
3.4 Castings shall be poured only from re- i_[_][_ , , _,. _....... rt_P_
F08M P5703-2
243
I II I III I I " - " { _ II III 1
5.3.2 _or muchanleal.-proper_y teeting_ 8.2.1 _1_en cmatinq_ for makin9 _£ni_hed o_ _I
soparately cast tes_ specimens shelf have a
semif£niahed parts ere produced o_ pu_rchased
0.25-1nch=diamster_-gauqe section i inch long
by the parts suppiler, the parts supplier I
between r_dil, ahell inspect castings from eae_ master heat •
or master heat lot represented end shall t
_.3.3 Tensilo testa shall be pe_for.med include in the report e statement that the
wlth-a strain rate of 0.005 inch per inch _castings conform, or shell Lnclude copies of _ _
per mlnute through the yield polnt_ at laboratory reports showln_ the r_sults of
which ti_e the strain rate may he increes'ed beets to dete_mlne conformance. "
to a cross head speed of 0.2 inch per
-. minute, -- 8,3 The supplier shall state tn the report _
the relatlv_ proportion of revert or virgin
5.3.4 Stress-rupture test specimens, shall martial used in preparation- of the master
I be tested ucder & constan_ stress of he_t.
I05_00 psi at a temperature of 1400 (_Sa_).
:" 9. QUALITY CONTROL•
5.3.5 _.cres§-ruptu_e tes_ specimens shall
-.... he tested under a constant stress _f 9.l C_atlnge shal_ be un_fo_in quality
29,000 ps_ _t 1800--+5°F.- and condi_lon, sound, and free-from foreign
materialS a_d_from internal_ andrexternal
6., IDENTZF_CATION AND PACKING imperfections in excess of,-those allowed in
I 6.1 Rash castling shall be identified, wlth EMS52300 for the specific class and grade.
paFt number and master heat number, in 9.2 At the option og AIResearch, _ casting
accordance with speoifloation HCS014. eha_l he selecte_ f_om any _astings received
• andshall be Inspecte_ in accordance with
_ 7. APPROVAL OR PROCUREMENT the appllca_le re_ulremeots for that-.part.
7.1 To assure enlformity'of quality, 9.3 Parts and material not conforming to
_ sample castings from new or reworked the requirements of this specification
master patterns shall be approved by the shall be _cJected.
_rchaser_
•. 8. REPORTS _
\ !
FORM P5703 -2
- 244
APPENDI_X-B.
245
j_
APPENDIY_ B ' 'v
. ACCEPTA_NCE ST/tNDARDS FO__R DIRECT__I_ONALLY-SOLIDIF!_ TURBIne.. BLADES.. .
'< I. APPLICATION 3.2.2 The master heat shall be in
'" accordance with EMS52330_Class Z.
..I This specification sstablishas the The use of gates, sprues, risers, or
f acceptance standards for directlonally rejected castings is not _e_rmlttsd.
i s_lidified _R-M 247 turbine blades. ._
_, 3.2.3 Remelting cf maate_ heats and pouring
l.l.1 MAR-M 247 is a cast, nickel-base of castings shall be accomplished under
superatlcy used for turbine wheels, vacuum.
hozzles, and blades at temperatures up
to 1800°F. 3.2.4 Master heats shall be qualified by
- testing spool;hens machined from blades.
i 1.1.2 When cast 4_Lractlonally soLldifled--
r there is a signlflcan_ improvement in 3.2.4.1 If the blade design does not
_" creep-rupture properties as compared to allow specimens to be machined from it,
;_ conventionally cast m_tterial, then blades P/N 3072111 shall be cast
along with the other blades and test spa-
i, _ 2, A_PLICABLEDOCUMENTS clans shall-b_u-_achinad from these blades.
, MIL-I-6866 Inspection, Penetrant Method of 3.3.5 The alrfoil ntldspan chord shall consist
• of a minimum of 5 grains, with no single grain
MIL-I-25135 Inspection Materials, Pane- exceeding 40% of the width.
trent
2.1.3. Aerospace Material Specificetion_ 3.3.7 A/I columnar grains which extend into any
part of the finished casting dimensions must
ARS 2280 Trace Element Control originate within a chill zone no greater than
3/16 inch above _he chill block surface.
3. TECHNIC_ REQUIREMENTS
3.4 Heat Treatment
3.1 Composition
3.4.1 All blades shall be solution heat treated
3.1.1 Chemical co,uposition shall be in prior to any abrasive blasting operation after
accordance with EMS55447, with trace removal of the castings from the mmld.
elements in accordance with AMS 2280,
Class 2. 3.4.1.1 Solution heat treat blades at
2250"F in vacuum for 2 hours. Blades
3.2 Master Heat Requirements shall b_ rapid inert gas cooled to below
le00"F.
3.2.1 Castings chall be poured only from
remelted master heat metal. 3.4.2 Following s, _utlon heat treat_nt, blades
to be tested Shall he given a simulated coating
3.2.1.I A master heat is previously re- cycle of 1800°F +25 for 5 hours and still air
fined metal of a single furnace charge, ccoledt followed-by aging at 1600°F _25 for 20
hours.
.........
FORM _5704-_"
.
247
I I I II _ R I I
3.7.2 Blade surfaces shall show no evidence 5.7 A sample from each heat-treat lot
of recrystallisation, alloy depletion, or received shall be inspected by AiResearch
carbide oxidation, for intergranular attack, reeryst_llization,
alloy depletion, and carbide oxidation.
4. PROCESS CONTROL
6. IDENTIFICATION AND PACKING
4.1 Cooling rate from solution-heat-treat
temperature shall be sufficiently fast to 6.1 Each casting shall be identified with
meet mechanical properties, part number and master heat number in
accordance with specification MC5014.
4.2 Solution heat-treat furnaces shall
be qualified by the casting supplier and 7. APPROVAL OR PROCUREMENT
approved by AiResearch.
7.i Approval of the supplier's fixed
4.2.1 To qualify a furnace, the casting process and prooes_ changes shall be in
supplier must heat treat a minimum of 15 accordance with EMS52332.
blades in a furnace loaded to the maximum
production heat treat capacity, and test 8. REPORTS
_ to the mQchanical-property requirements
five blades per condition). A simulated 8.1 The supplier of castings shall furnish
load by weight may be used. to AiRaseareh Receiving Inspection with _ach
shipment a report lis£1ng the results of the
mechanical-property tests for each
5. INSPECTION solutlon-heat-treat lot and master h_,at,
the results of the chemical analysis from
5.1 Visual Inspection - All blades shall be one casting per master heat _:epresenting
! Inspucted in accordance with Table I. the part number shipped, and a statement
that the castings conform to the require-
5.2 Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection monte of this specification.
7
.- 5.2.1 All blades shall be processed per
.. MIL-I-6866 with a Group V or VI level
penetrant per MIL-I-25135.
|i
FORM P5704-_ -- '
248
o
J
L I r I I ....... i .............. _ i
[8.1.1 This _epo_t Ihell £noleda the puT-
. chase o_de_ nemb_, m_.er heat non,bur end
cod_ symbol, if used, solutlon-heet-t_ea_ ;:
number, m_teriel speoific_ion number end..
iLs revision _etto_, pert number, end
quantity from-each heat.
_ 9, QUALITY CONTROL
9.1 Castings shall be un¢=orm in quality
, and condition, sound, and free f_om-foreign
materials and from In_ernal and external
imperfection in excess of those,allowed in
this s_eeificatlon.
%, -
I
FORM PSY04-_
249
I J • I " II Ill I I | I | I[ _"
I MaX of lO per
B .015 .010 .020 .005
L (4) .25
ares. _ _25
Max. of 5 per
PLATFOrmS .OiO .010 .020 .O05 .25 x .25 .
area.
(I) generally porosity, conoentrated in local areas with no individual indication exceeding
.010 dla. x .010 depth.
(2) Limited to 2 areas per surface.
(3) .OIG parting line allowe_ in fillet radii, .003 max. On leading and trailing edges.
(4} A cluster of these indications not to exceed .125 dis. and should be separated by .25 o_
good area.-
(5) A cluster of these indications should not e_ceed 5 par .25 x .25 area and 2 area• per
surfac.D.
- (6) Gate wltnees of .030 allowed on stock added surfaces,
(7) Thru or like impe=fectione appearing on opposite_sides are not a=ceptable p_oviding thel
are interpretable.
(8@ Indications which will be removed in machining are acceptable.
(9) _Inear, cola shut, Or cEack-_ike imper_ection• are not acceptable.
m i , , ii T - . i
F-C_M PI,704-,II ....
• 250
.a
am_
Ir Iv,IM_t4_,.,ff_i,_,r,4*_sljmi _ • I III - 7 -_ 1 I g
I.--
_ TABLE I_. FL[;OR/_SCENT PENETRA_ ACCEPTJ_J_ CJ¢IT_RI_. , '
'_" P ENETRAN_
;'
-2i-T" R "
I_DXVIDUAL
BLEED 9UT
NO_T11_TE_ RE-
TABLE (i) (2)
! (I) Generally porosity, concentrated in local, areas with. no ind_vldual indication exceedIDg
.010 dla. x .O10 depth.
" (2) L_mited to 2 areas per surface.
i _ (3) Thru or like imperfections appearing 3n opp3_ite sides are not acceptable providing they"
} _. a_e interpretable.
(4) Indications _hic_ will be removed in machining are acceptable.
i_. " 5) A cluster of these indications not to exceed .125 dis. and should be separated by .25
of good area.
} (6) Linear, cold shut, or crack-like Imperfections. are not _coepteble.
i <" TABLE ZII, RADIOGRAPHIC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.
- BLADE
RADIOGRAPHIC INDICATIONS
____._ AREA
:, - 2 areas per
BASE none .020 5 x
;_.. surface
(2) Minimum spacin 9 bet_veen indications is determined by circumscribing a circle around "
the. larger indication and multiplying its diameter by the apacin_ factor.
i2"
!
_--, _ 251
-- . . i_||i i
i• rl I _ 111• rl| i I
Thi_dppendJx o_£e_s_alte_nata methods fo_ atchiL_g cas_ blades p_lor to inupection. Tha,_
OLo|_i_g muthods a_a utilized to accomplish, two _l_'L_oaes, (L) to ohtal_l an etoh-suf£1aient
to expose gJ:ai, bounda_ies prio_ to ._acrograin lnapuction_ and /.2) to obtain a cleanin_
etch. When specified, the cleaning etch sh_lL be used`prior to f_tuO=aacent-_enetrant
l.epaetion,
CAUTION: M_xing of solutions and etching of par_s _ust be accomplished in an a_ea with
_dequa_e exhaust ventilat_on, as toxic fumes are liberated from _he etchants.
Method I
£tohlng Solution :
a) A new. solution shall-he prepared when a suitable etch is not obtained within
i2 minutes.
b) DO no_ replenish to maintain volume,
Procedbre :
, Method 2
Etching Solution:
Ap_rox 2 liters
MU#l_tlc acid (20' _e) 90% by VOI (1615 ml)
Glacial acetic acid 5% by VO_. __ (85 ml)
Nit=it acld_ (42" Be) 5% by vol. (85 ml)
Ferric chloride to saturation (12,5 lbs)----
i. Ad_ acetic acid--to m_ri_tlc acid while cautiously agltati_g the mixture.
2. Gently heat the mlxtur_ and add sufficient ferric chloride to raise the boiling
point tO 150-160"F,
3. Cool-saturated solution to<100*F, then cautiously add nit¢ic acid while agitating
the atchant. CAUTION: Never add nLt_Jc acld to the etchant..when temperature is
above 100_F,
a) The etchant shall be discarded when the etohin_ time requires more than two
minutes to delineate the macrogtaln structure.
_rocedur_._
}.,... Pack parts in suitable tray o¢ basket as tha_ alrfoi_a GO not come in contact with
each other.
252
. _ - . _. _-.-_._._.._,._=E_.le.-.._.-..mw_..._, _
k
2. Ir_eree in acid atohau_ (_0 *IO°P) for 4 minimum length QE time to bring hm_ro-
qrain st=u=ture visible te una-ldnd aye. Maximum exposure time in the atchanC
shrill be limited _c two minutes. Thu et_hant Cr pa_s sh_ll be-agitated to aid
i_ obLaining uniform etching and to mlnlai_e thu exli_sure time.
i
Etc_£ng SoiutloR :
1. Add hydrogen peroxide t_ mu_iatio &ei_L while cautiously agitating the mixture,
a} Ma_e up solution Just prior to usage,
b] Whenever possible, the etching solutlon _ontalner should be immersed in a tap
water rinse tank foL- the purpose of dleslp_ting the heat liberated during the
etching process, so that an etching time cycle can be establlehe_,
c) Th_ etchent shall be discarded when the etching time requires more than five
minutes re delineate the macrogEain structure.
Procedure !
L Pack parts in eulteble tray or basket so that airfoils do not co_ in contact with
each other,
2, Ims_erse in acid et_hant maintained at room temperature (75-I00_P) for a minimum
length of time (5 mln, _ax,) to bring mecrograln structure vleible to unaided eye
when _nspecting for grain slze and casting irregu_aritles,
a} l,une_eion time for c_eanlng etch sha_l be _0-25 seconds.
3, R_nse in running tap water. Hand brushing or air-water power f_uehing may be
r_,_u_red if residual smut is _ot removed during the rinse c_cle.
4, Rinse in hot tap water and dry,
i -
"- 1. Re_rt No,-- I 2. G_ernmen_Accmion No, 3. Recipient's_talo9 No.
CR-159464 _,
." 4. Titleand Subtitle 5. Re_rt Oate
Project Manaeer:
" Robert L. Dreshfiel_,
NASA-Lewis Research Materials
Center, and Structures
Cleveland, Ohio Division
Turbofan Engine. This development was the result of Project i of the Materials for
solidified high-pressure turbine blades was successfully developed for the TFE731-3
-- Advance_Turbine Engines [MATE) Program, a five-year cooperative Government/Industry
effort. The goals of this project were to: (i) reduce engine specific fuel consump-
tion (SFC} at least 1.7 percent; (2) reduce engine manufacturing Costs at least 3.2
i percent; (3) reduce engine weight at least 1 percent; and (4) reduce engine mainte-
:' nance costs at least 6.2 percent. These benefits were anticipated by the substitution
i of solid, uncooled directionally-solidified turbine blades for hollow, cooled,
; equlaxed-grain, turbine blades.
Task I established the basic processing parameters using MAR-M 247 and employing the
" exothermic directional-_olidification process in trial castings of turbine blades.
Task II evaluated the nickel-based alloys MAR-M 247, MAR-M 200+Hf, IN 792+Hf, and
NASA-TRW-R as directionally-solidified cast blades. Task III further evaluated the
-_ three alloys with the highest stress-rupture strengths. In Task IV a new turbine
=' blade, disk, and associated components were designed using previously determined
material properties. Task V manufactured sufficient DS blades and other hardware for
Jthe required engine testing. Task Vl subjected exothermically-cast directionally-
_- . lsolldified turbine blades of MAR-M 247 and MAR-M 200+Hf to engine test. Task VII
analysed the engine test results and compared the results to the originally estab-
|llshed goals.-
; -
- 1_. S_urity _assif. [of this re_rt) i 20.
I "
_curlty Cl|s%i{. (Of this page]
=
I 22 Pr_e"