Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    Queven James Elemino
    1) The majority (70.22%) of students experienced high anxiety, while 24.44% experienced very high anxiety and only 5.33% experienced moderate anxiety. 2) Most students (40%) scored between 80-84 on their physics grade, while 33.33% scored between 75-79. 3) There was a significant positive correlation (r=0.145, p=0.030) between students' level of anxiety and their grade in physics, with students experiencing moderate anxiety having a significantly higher grade than those with high anxiety.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    Queven James Elemino
    22 views3 pages
    1) The majority (70.22%) of students experienced high anxiety, while 24.44% experienced very high anxiety and only 5.33% experienced moderate anxiety. 2) Most students (40%) scored between 80-84 on their physics grade, while 33.33% scored between 75-79. 3) There was a significant positive correlation (r=0.145, p=0.030) between students' level of anxiety and their grade in physics, with students experiencing moderate anxiety having a significantly higher grade than those with high anxiety.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The majority (70.22%) of students experienced high anxiety, while 24.44% experienced very high anxiety and only 5.33% experienced moderate anxiety. 2) Most students (40%) scored between 80-84 on their physics grade, while 33.33% scored between 75-79. 3) There was a significant positive correlation (r=0.145, p=0.030) between students' level of anxiety and their grade in physics, with students experiencing moderate anxiety having a significantly higher grade than those with high anxiety.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    22 views3 pages

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    Queven James Elemino
    1) The majority (70.22%) of students experienced high anxiety, while 24.44% experienced very high anxiety and only 5.33% experienced moderate anxiety. 2) Most students (40%) scored between 80-84 on their physics grade, while 33.33% scored between 75-79. 3) There was a significant positive correlation (r=0.145, p=0.030) between students' level of anxiety and their grade in physics, with students experiencing moderate anxiety having a significantly higher grade than those with high anxiety.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Level of Anxiety Frequency Percentage

    Minimal Anxiety 0 0
    Partial Anxiety 0 0
    Moderate Anxiety 12 5.33
    High Anxiety 158 70.22
    Very High Anxiety 55 24.44
    TOTAL 225 100

    Grade in Physics Frequency Percentage


    75 - 79 75 33.33
    80 - 84 90 40
    85 - 89 41 18.22
    90 - 94 11 4.89
    95 - 100 8 3.56
    TOTAL 225 100

    Standard Pearson
    Variables n Mean P Value Relationship
    Deviation Correlation
    Level of
    225 4.19 0.512
    Anxiety
    0.145 0.030 Significant
    Grade in
    225 1.96 0.839
    Physics

    Level of Standard
    Mean n F Stat P Value Difference
    Anxiety Deviation
    Moderate
    2.25 0.87 12
    Anxiety
    High Anxiety 1.82 0.82 158 7.010 0.001 Significant
    Very High
    2.27 0.80 55
    Anxiety
    Correlation Matrix
    Correlation Matrix

        A B

    A Pearson's r —  
      p-value —  

    B Pearson's r 0.145 —
      p-value 0.030 —

     Anxiety

    Percentag Valid Cumulative


    Frequency
    e Percent Percent
    60 1 0.44 0.44 0.44
    61 2 0.89 0.89 1.33
    62 1 0.44 0.44 1.77
    63 1 0.44 0.44 2.21
    64 2 0.89 0.89 3.1
    65 1 0.44 0.44 3.54
    66 2 0.89 0.89 4.43
    67 1 0.44 0.44 4.87
    68 2 0.89 0.89 5.76
    69 1 0.44 0.44 6.2
    70 1 0.44 0.44 6.64
    71 12 5.33 5.33 11.97
    72 10 4.44 4.44 16.41
    73 13 5.78 5.78 22.19
    74 15 6.67 6.67 28.86
    75 16 7.11 7.11 35.97
    76 20 8.89 8.89 44.86
    77 14 6.22 6.22 51.08
    78 16 7.11 7.11 58.19
    79 17 7.56 7.56 65.75
    80 22 9.78 9.78 75.53
    81 3 1.33 1.33 76.86
    82 3 1.33 1.33 78.19
    83 3 1.33 1.33 79.52
    84 1 0.44 0.44 79.96
    85 5 2.22 2.22 82.18
    86 3 1.33 1.33 83.51
    87 2 0.89 0.89 84.4
    88 3 1.33 1.33 85.73
    89 3 1.33 1.33 87.06
    90 1 0.44 0.44 87.5
    91 3 1.33 1.33 88.83
    92 2 0.89 0.89 89.72
    93 3 1.33 1.33 91.05
    94 3 1.33 1.33 92.38
    95 3 1.33 1.33 93.71
    96 3 1.33 1.33 95.04
    97 5 2.22 2.22 97.26
    98 3 1.33 1.33 98.59
    99 3 1.33 1.33 100
    Total 225 100 100

    Grade
    Percentag Valid Cumulative
    Frequency
    e Percent Percent
    75 15 6.67 6.67 6.67
    76 17 7.56 7.56 14.23
    77 13 5.78 5.78 20.01
    78 12 5.33 5.33 25.34
    79 18 8 8 33.34
    80 16 7.11 7.11 40.45
    81 20 8.89 8.89 49.34
    82 18 8 8 57.34
    83 15 6.67 6.67 64.01
    84 21 9.33 9.33 73.34
    85 11 4.89 4.89 78.23
    86 6 2.67 2.67 80.9
    87 5 2.22 2.22 83.12
    88 10 4.44 4.44 87.56
    89 9 4 4 91.56
    90 2 0.89 0.89 92.45
    91 2 0.89 0.89 93.34
    92 3 1.33 1.33 94.67
    93 1 0.44 0.44 95.11
    94 3 1.33 1.33 96.44
    95 1 0.44 0.44 96.88
    96 2 0.89 0.89 97.77
    97 2 0.89 0.89 98.66
    98 1 0.44 0.44 99.1
    99 2 0.89 0.89 100
    Total 225 100 100

    You might also like