Planning and Risk Assessment
Planning and Risk Assessment
Planning and Risk Assessment
201 to 214
203 Hart
Describe substantive procedures the auditor should perform to obtain sufficient and
Explain the safeguards which Morph & Co should implement to ensure that this
conflict of interest is appropriately managed.
- Both hart co and its competitors should be notified that Morph co would be acting as auditors
for each company and consent should be obtained from the management of each company
- Morph co should consider one or both the clients to seek additional independent advice
- Morph Co should ensure that it appoints separate engagement teams, with different
engagement partner and team members to each client; once an employee has worked on the
audit, such as hart co, they should be prevented from being on the audit of the competitor
company for a period of time
- Adequate procedures should be in place within the firm to prevent access to information for
example strict physical separation of both teams and confidential and secure data filing
- Morph Co should consider use of confidentiality agreements by the all the members of the audit
engagement team of Hart Co and the competitor
- Work performed should be reviewed by an appropriate reviewer who is not involved in the
audit to assess whether key judgment and conclusions are appropriate
- Regular monitoring of the above safeguards should be undertaken by a senior member of
Morph Co not involved in either of the audit
204
Explain the PURPOSE of an audit engagement letter and list FOUR items which should
- Minimize the risk of misunderstanding between the auditor and the client
- Confirm acceptance of engagement
- Forms the basis of contract by outlining the terms and conditions of the engagement
Responsibilities of management
Identification of the financial reporting framework used in the preparation of the financial statements
Explain WHY the following factors should have been considered by Orange & Co prior
to accepting Scarlet Co as a new audit client
Pre‐acceptance factors Explanation Explanation
The outgoing auditor’s response the auditor should consider the outgoing auditor response to
assess whether there are any ethical or professional reason why the firm should not accept the
engagement
Management integrity if the management lack integrity, then there is higher risk of fraud
and intidimation. If there are serious concerns regarding this then the management should not accept
the audit engagement
Pre‐conditions for an audit Preconditions are :
- Preparing the financial statement in accordance to the financial reporting framework
- Internal controls necessary for the preparation free to be from material misstatement
- Providing the auditors with access to information relevant for the audit and access to staff
within the entity to obtain audit evidence
Independence and objectivity they should consider whether there are any risk to the auditor’s
independence and objectivity and whether they can be reduced to an acceptable low level by applying
appropriate safeguards. If such threats are present and cannot be sufficiently mitigated then they should
not accept the engagement
Resources available at the time of the audit Orange Co must have adequate resources and relevant
experience at the time when the audit of Scarlet Co is likely to be carried out. All audit staff deployed to
the audit of Scarlet Co must be capable of carrying out the audit in relevance to the International
Standards on Auditing. If adequate resources are not available then the audit firm should not accept the
audit engagement
Describe substantive procedures the auditor should perform to obtain sufficient and
appropriate audit evidence in respect of the redundancy costs.
- Review the board minutes for evidence of the decision to discontinue the chemical prior to the
year end
- Review the supporting documentation to confirm the decision to discontinue the brand was
notified to the four staffs prior to the year end
- Obtain the details of redundancy calculated by employee and cast the schedule and agree to the
financial statements or trial balance
- Recalculate the redundancy provision to confirm completeness and agree the components of
the cost to the supporting documentation such as employee contracts
- Obtain a written representations from the management confirming the completeness of the
cost
- Agree the redundancy made in July 20X5 to the payroll or cash books and compare these to the
provisions in the financial statements
- Review the financial statement disclosures to verify they are in compliance with the IAS 37
Provisions, Contingent Assets, Contingent Liabilities
203
- Helping the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit
- Helping the auditor to identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis
- Helps the auditor to organize and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an
effective and efficient manner
- Assisting in the selection of suitable team member for the engagement who have appropriate
level of capabilities and competence to respond to anticipated risks and the proper assignment
of work to them
- Assisting, where applicable, in coordination of work done by experts
C
- Review the financial statement disclosure to ensure that they are in accordance to the local
legislation
- Agree the amounts paid to the director as bonus to the board minutes and the contracts to
ensure they are included in the current year’s financial statement fully accrued and disclosed
- Obtain a schedule of director’s bonus and cast the schedule to ensure accuracy. Agree the
amount to that disclosed in the financial statements
- Confirm the bonus paid to the directors by reviewing the post year end cash book and the bank
statements
- Obtain a written representation from the management ensuring the completeness of the
director’s remuneration including bonus
- Recalculate the bonus payments and agree the criteria to the supporting documentation and
the percentage rates to be paid to the director’s service contracts
- Agree the individual bonus payment to the post year end payroll records
- Both Hart Co and the competitor should be notified that the Morph Co will be auditing each of
the company and should get consent from each of the both clients
- Morph co should consider advising one or both the clients to seek additional independence
advice
- Adequate procedures should be in place to prevent the access of information like physical
separation of the both teams and confidential and secure data filing
- Morph Co should consider using the confidentiality agreement signed by the team members of
the Hart Co and competitor
- The work done by the engagement team of both the company should be reviewed by an
independent reviewer who is not associated to either of the audit
- Morph Co should assign different audit engagement team including audit engagement partner
and team member; and once an employee has worked for one company, for instance, Hart Co
then they shouldn’t be allowed to work in the audit of its competitor for some time
- Regular monitoring of the application of the above-mentioned safeguards by a senior member
of Morph Co who is not engaged in either audit
201
Peach
Training costs
The staffs were trained regarding the site The audit team should discuss with management
preparation for the new site for the machinery the accounting treatment applied and request
and its testing which has been included in the the relevant staff cost to be included in the cost
wages and salary expenses the period of the PPE.
IAS 16 Property Plant and Equipment directly
states that any direct cost used to bring the
machinery into its intended condition is
capitalised in the financial statements as the cost
of the asset. The site production and the testing
are included in those.
It appears that incorrect accounting treatment
has been applied in case of the staff costs, where
the cost of the asset has been understated and
the salary and wages have been overstated.
Extension of useful life
The directors have extended the useful life of the
machinery despite the fact that the machinery
has been disposed at a significant loss The audit teams should discuss the rationale
Under IAS 16 Asset lives should be reviewed behind increasing the asset lives and reduction of
annually and if it does genuinely has assets life the depreciation
increased then the decrease of depreciation is The revised useful life of assets should be
reasonable. However, the fact that the machinery compared to how often the asset gets replaced
were sold at a significant loss does not support and the loss or gain on its disposal as it provides
the decision to increase the life evidence of the useful life of the assets
As such, it appears that the plant and machinery
has been overstated and the depreciation
expense has been understated
Fraudulent purchases
It has been discovered that there was fraudulent The audit team should discuss how the fraud was
purchase of non-current assets for the personal detected and corrected. They must understand
use. the controls in place to prevent the fraud from
Since the reconciliation of the physical assets to occurring in the future
the non-current assets register is still ongoing and
isn’t going to be complete by the year end there
is a risk of the non-current assets being
overstated as they simply may include the
personal non-current assets purchased
Control risk has also increased if the fraud was
ongoing for a lot of the time
Legal Claim
Peach Co’s previous supplier has sued the The audit team should the correspondence with
company for the breach of contract claiming they management’s lawyer to understand the
didn’t have the right to exit the agreement early. likelihood of the supplier winning the case the
The claim hasn’t been settled but the legal team amount of the payments to be made to them.
of peach Co believe that they will have to pay
around 0.3 million
As it appears the Peach Co would have to pay to
settle the claim , the provision is required to
comply with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Assets
and Contingent Liabilities
There is a risk of understatement of the
Provisions for this claim
New bank loan
Peach Co has just secured a new bank loan in the The audit team should undertake a review of the
year repayable over three years loan agreement to confirm the details and
There’s a risk that the loan hasn’t been correctly reperform the calculation to confirm that the
allocated between current and non-current loan has been correctly classified into current and
liabilities which would give rise to classification non-current liabilities
error and the liabilities being misstated. The finance costs should be recalculated and
In addition, the finance cost is paid in arrear and agreed to the arrears schedule
may not have been correctly accrued at the year
end resulting in understated accruals and finance
costs
B
Describe Apricot & Co’s responsibilities in relation to the prevention and detection
- Apricot and Co must conduct the audit in accordance with the IAS 240 The Auditor’s
responsibilities relating to fraud in audit and provide reasonable assurance that the financial
statements taken as a whole are free from material misstatement either due to fraud or error
- Apricot and Co is required to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the
financial statement due to fraud
- Apricot and Co need to acquire audit evidence regarding the risk of material misstatement due
to fraud through designing and implementing appropriate responses
- Apricot Co should respond appropriately to fraud or suspected fraud identified during the audit
- Apricot Co should report any fraud or suspected fraud to the appropriate parties
- While obtaining reasonable assurance, Apricot and co are required to maintain professional
scepticism throughout the audit, considering the potential override of controls by the
management and recognising the fact that the audit procedures which are effective in detecting
error might not be effective in detecting fraud.
202
Corley Appliances
IAS 210 Agreeing the terms of the audit engagement Requires an auditor to:
- Determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of
financial statements are acceptable.
In considering this the auditor should have assessed the nature of the entity, nature and the
purpose of the financial statements and whether law or legislation prescribes the applicable
reporting framework
- Obtain the agreement of the management that it acknowledges and understand its
responsibilities of the following.
A) Preparing the financial statement in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework
B) Internal Control necessary for the preparation of financial statements to be free from material
misstatement either due to fraud or error
C) Providing the auditor with the access to information relevant to the audit and access to staff
within entity to obtain audit evidence.
B)
Professional scepticism is defined as IAS 200 Overall objectives of Independent Auditor and Conduct of
an Audit in accordance with the International standards on Audit as an attitude with questioning mind,
being alert to possible material misstatement due to fraud or error and a critical assessment of audit
evidence.
205
Harlem Co
B)
Bonus shares
Harlem co has issued the share this year via Review the board minutes for authorisation and
bonus issues. Share capital of the equity should terms of bonus and review if the transaction has
increase by the value of the shares and the been conducted in line with this approval.
reserves should decrease accordingly. Review the adequacy of bonus issue disclosures
If the company has not accounted for a bonus in financial statements
issue before, there is a risk that it could have
been incorrectly treated with equity being under
or overstated. In addition, legal issues may arise if
the shares have not been issued in accordance
with the company’s statutory constitution.
Additionally, bonus issues require disclosure in
the financial statements and there is a risk that
these may be incomplete or inaccurate.
In line with ISA 220 (Revised) Quality Management for an Audit of Financial
Statements, describe the audit supervisor’s responsibilities in relation to supervising
and reviewing the audit assistants’ work during the audit of Harlem Co. (4 marks)
Answer
Supervision
During the audit, the supervisor should keep track of the progress of the audit engagement to ensure
that the audit timetable is met and should ensure that the audit manager and partner are kept updated
of progress. The competence and capabilities of individual members of the engagement team should be
considered, including whether they have sufficient time to carry out their work, whether they
understand their instructions and whether the work is being carried out in accordance with the planned
approach to the audit. In addition, part of the supervision process should involve addressing any
significant matters arising during the audit, considering their significance and modifying the planned
approach appropriately. The supervisor would also be responsible for identifying matters for
consultation or consideration by the audit manager or engagement partner of Harlem Co.
Review
The supervisor would be required to review the work completed by the assistants and consider whether
this work has been performed in accordance with professional standards and other regulatory
requirements and if the work performed supports the conclusions reached and has been properly
documented. The supervisor should also consider whether all significant matters have been raised for
partner attention or for further consideration and where appropriate consultations have taken place,
whether appropriate conclusions have been documented.
Valuation of receivables