DAC21801 - FYP Rubric CeDS 20222023 - EX - Final
DAC21801 - FYP Rubric CeDS 20222023 - EX - Final
DAC21801 - FYP Rubric CeDS 20222023 - EX - Final
Score (1-5)
Criteria Weightage Very Very
Poor Fair Good TOTAL
Poor Good
Student Member a b c a b c a b c a b c a b c a b c
Completeness of content with 2.0
information resources
Presentation skills 0.8
Question & Answer 1.2
Ʃ 0 0 0
PART III: PROJECT PROPOSAL (20%) (CLO1 - LOD 1, PLO 4, C5)
CLO 1 - Develop project proposals through searching of relevant knowledge and information.
PLO4: DP1, DP4, DP5
Score (1-5)
Criteria Weightage Very Very
Poor Fair Good TOTAL
Poor Good
Introduction (Background, problem
statement,objectives, scope and
1.2 0
limitation, and expected result.
(Chapter 1)
Literature
1.4 0
(Chapter 2)
Methodology
0.8 0
(Chapter 3)
Writing format 0.3
Able to fully
Able to understand and Able to fully understand,
Unable to understand Able to understand and understand, respond
NA5 answer question but not respond and make
Question & Answer and respond to the answer to the given and make justification
able accurately answer justification to the given
question question satisfactoryly to the given question
the question question
very well
An acceptable
Very Poor literature Poor literature review A good literature review A systematic literature
literature review and
review and irrelevant but relevant supporting and relevant supporting review and relevant
Literature DK4 DP4 relevant supporting
supporting sources in sources in engineering sources in engineering supporting sources in
sources in engineering
engineering issue issue issue engineering issue
issue
An acceptable A systematic
Very poor methodology Poor methodology A good methodology
methodology methodology
DK1, DK2, D3, framework and adopt framework but adopt framework and adopt
Methodology DP5 framework and adopt framework and adopt
DK5 irrelevant codes and relevant codes and relevant codes and
relevant codes and relevant codes and
standard methods. standard methods. standard methods.
standard methods. standard methods.
Very poor sources, and Poor sources, and An acceptable sources, A good sources, and A systematic sources,
citations are very citations are poor and citations consistent citations consistent with and citations consistent
References & Citation - - inconsistent with the list inconsistent with the list with the list of the list of references with the list of
of references of references references references
Dublin Knowledge Profile: DK1- DK7
Dublin Knowledge Profile : DK1- DK7
DK Characteristic
A descriptive, formula-based understanding of the natural sciences applicable
DK1 Natural sciences
in a sub-discipline
Practical engineering
DK6 Codified practical engineering knowledge in recognized practice area
knowledge
Knowledge of issues Knowledge of issues and approaches in engineering technician practice: ethics,
DK7
& approaches financial, cultural, environmental and sustainability impact
Range of conflicting
DP2 Involve several issues, but with few of these exerting conflicting constraints
requirements
Depth of analysis
DP3 Can be solved in standardized ways
required
Extent of applicable
DP5 Are encompassed by standards and/or documented codes of practice
codes
Extent of stakeholder
DP6 involvement and Involve a limited range of stakeholders with differing needs
conflicting
Components of
DP7 Are discrete components of engineering systems
engineering system
Well Defined Engineering Activities Profile: NA1-NA5
Well Defined Engineering Activities: NA1-NA5
NA Characteristic
Involve a limited range of resources (and for this purpose resources includes
NA1 Range of resources
people, money, equipment, materials, information and technologies)