The Determinant Factors of E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program
The Determinant Factors of E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program
The Determinant Factors of E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program
Abstract—The research objective is to analyze the transactions, the Indonesians’ online purchase behavior
determinant factors of the purchase intention during a also increases.
flash sale program. It is conducted from October 2018 Around 2014, electronic commerce began to develop
to January 2019. The researchers apply a quantitative
approach. The sampling technique is snowball sampling. rapidly in Indonesia. Some e-commerce names like
The survey data are collected from 210 respondents Bhinneka, Lazada, Tokopedia, Blibli, Bukalapak, and
who shop online in Indonesia using questionnaires. The others started to advertise a lot through advertising
data are examined using Structural Equation Modelling media on TV, the Internet, and others to get people
(SEM) with AMOS ver. 25. The research results indi- to buy online. The products sold on an e-commerce
cate that the effect of perceived usefulness, information
quality, and web quality on purchase intention are website are various, such as fashion products, elec-
mediated by attitude. The flash sale program has a tronic devices, beauty care, household appliances, and
moderating impact on purchase intention. The effect of transportation tickets.
perceived ease of use and trust in the purchase intention E-commerce is business, technology, society, and
mediated by attitude is not significant. The R-squared the ability to buy and sell goods and services via
value of attitude on e-commerce is 0.527, and purchase
intention is 0.369. These research results are important the Internet. It involves the process of ordering goods
for e-commerce management to understand the essential and services, as well as shipping to consumers. E-
factors of purchase intention during a flash sale program. commerce was introduced 40 years ago and until now
continues to grow with new technology, innovation,
Index Terms—Purchase Intention, Perceived Ease of and thousands of businesses entering the online market
Use, Information Quality, Web Quality, Flash Sale Pro- every year. The main goal is to provide comfort, safety,
gram and experience to consumers [3]. In the context of
electronics, e-commerce is the production, distribution,
I. I NTRODUCTION marketing, sale, or delivery of goods and services by
electronic means [4].
66
Cite this article as: A. M. Sundjaja, G. V. Arisanto, and S. Fatimah, “The Determinant Factors of
E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program”, CommIT (Communication & Information
Technology) Journal 14(2), 65–72, 2020.
67
Cite this article as: A. M. Sundjaja, G. V. Arisanto, and S. Fatimah, “The Determinant Factors of
E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program”, CommIT (Communication & Information
Technology) Journal 14(2), 65–72, 2020.
TABLE I
R ESPONDENT P ROFILE AND E- COMMERCE P URCHASE B EHAVIOUR .
Question N % Question N %
Gender E-Commerce Purchase Frequency
Male 87 41 ≥ 3 times/week 8 4
Female 123 59 < 3 times/week 51 24
Age < 3 times/month 71 34
13 – 20 54 26 ≥ 3 times/month 42 20
21 – 30 123 59 ≥ 3 times/year 19 9
31 – 40 20 9 < 3 times/year 19 9
> 40 13 6 E-Commerce Purchase Value
Education < Rp100,000.00 16 8
Junior High School 5 3 < Rp450,000.00 144 68
Senior High School 114 54 < Rp1,000,000.00 37 18
Diploma/Undergraduate 58 27 ≥ Rp1,000,000.00 13 6
Master Degree 24 12 E-Commerce Platform
Doctoral Degree 9 4 Tokopedia 180 85.7
Occupation Shopee 171 81.4
Student 120 57 Lazada 128 60.9
Housewife 7 3 Bukalapak 79 37.6
Entrepreneur 13 6 JD.id 36 17.1
Employee 70 34 Blibli.com 21 10
N= 210 respondents.
TABLE II
T HE R ESULTS OF M ISSING VALUE T EST, N ORMALITY T EST, VALIDITY, AND R ELIABILITY T ESTS .
Based on the frequency of shopping on e-commerce can choose three answers. Table I presents the profile
sites, most respondents shop less than 3 times per and behavior of respondents who shop through e-
month (34% or 71 respondents). The results are fol- commerce during the flash sale program.
lowed by more than or equal to 3 times per month
(20% or 42 respondents), less than 3 times per week The researchers conduct the missing value test. It
(24% or 51 respondents), less than 3 times per month examines the incomplete data from the data collection
(9% or 19 respondents), more than or equal to 3 times process. Based on the filled questionnaire results, the
per year (9% or 19 respondents), and more than or data are complete because the questionnaire designed
equal to 3 times per week (4% or 8 respondents). using Google Forms has added the function of the
For the spending on e-commerce sites, 16 respondents validation field that must not be empty. Next, the
have spent less than Rp100,000.00 on e-commerce researchers test the normality to determine whether the
sites (8%). Then, 144 respondents spend less than data are normally distributed or not. Research using
Rp450,000.00 (68%), and 37 respondents use less than questionnaires can be tested parametrically to analyze
Rp1,000,000.00 (18%) on e-commerce sites. About consumers’ opinions using a Likert scale. The sample
6% or 13 respondents have average spending of more used in the research is below 300 so that normality tests
than or equal to Rp1,000,000.00. According to the can be done by evaluating the distribution of skewness
most commonly used e-commerce, the top three e- and kurtosis [31]. Table II shows the skewness and
commerces are Tokopedia (85.7%), Shopee (81.4%), kurtosis value of all variables. If the z-score has a
and Lazada (60.9%). In this question, the respondents range outside of -3.29 and +3.29 with an alpha level
of 0.05, the data distribution is considered abnormal.
68
Cite this article as: A. M. Sundjaja, G. V. Arisanto, and S. Fatimah, “The Determinant Factors of
E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program”, CommIT (Communication & Information
Technology) Journal 14(2), 65–72, 2020.
TABLE III
D ESCRIPTIVE A NALYSIS AND C ONFIRMATORY FACTORS A NALYSIS R ESULTS OF Q UESTIONNAIRE I NDICATORS .
TABLE IV reliable.
M ODIFICATION I NDICES AND PAR C HANGE VALUE .
Then, Table III shows the mean, standardized load-
Covariance M.I Par Change ing, average variance extracted, and construct relia-
E1 (PEOU 1) – E2 4.067 0.022
bility of each indicator and variable. In the research,
(PEOU 2) the cut-off value is 0.6 for factor analysis and 0.5 for
E4 (PU 1) – E6 (PU 6.859 -0.042
3)
the average variance extracted. Therefore, the indica-
E16 (ATT 1) – E18 8.910 -0.058 tors already accurately measure the perceived ease of
(ATT 3)
use, perceived usefulness, trust, information quality,
M.I= modification indices
web quality, attitude, and purchase intention on e-
commerce. For testing the reliability, the cut-off value
for construct reliability is 0.8. All variables have CR
The researchers can conclude that the data are normally values above 0.8, so that the variables are reliable.
distributed. Next, the researchers investigate the measurement
For the pre-test, the questionnaires are distributed model using the goodness-of-fit indices. The results
to 30 respondents. The results of the questionnaire of goodness-of-fit indices show the model is fairly fit:
are examined using SPPS. Using Bivariate Correlation, χ2 = 229.346, χ2 /d.f = 1.365; GFI = 0.910; AGFI =
researchers test the validity of all indicators in each 0.876; NFI = 0.930; CFI = 0.980; RMSEA = 0.042;
variable. Moreover, the researchers calculate Cron- and TLI = 0.975. The researchers refine the model
bach’s alpha by using SPPS to test the reliability of using modification indices by adding three correlations
the research instrument. Reliability for each factor is between indicators of perceived ease of use (PEOU) 1
calculated using the coefficient of α, with a value of and 2, indicators of perceived usefulness (PU) 1 and
0.937 [13]. Based on Table II, the data are valid and 3, and indicators of attitude (ATT) 1 and 3. Table IV
69
Cite this article as: A. M. Sundjaja, G. V. Arisanto, and S. Fatimah, “The Determinant Factors of
E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program”, CommIT (Communication & Information
Technology) Journal 14(2), 65–72, 2020.
70
Cite this article as: A. M. Sundjaja, G. V. Arisanto, and S. Fatimah, “The Determinant Factors of
E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program”, CommIT (Communication & Information
Technology) Journal 14(2), 65–72, 2020.
researchers focus on the positive impact of the flash to-consumer e-commerce,” Intangible Capital,
sale program on purchase intention. Future researchers vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 946–966, 2017.
should investigate the effect on consumers’ experience [10] M. Nilashi, D. Jannach, O. Bin Ibrahim, M. D.
or satisfaction. Third, the participants are not asked Esfahani, and H. Ahmadi, “Recommendation
to mention their living location. Since Indonesia is quality, transparency, and website quality for
a multicultural country, it is interesting to test the trust-Building in recommendation agents,” Elec-
moderating effect on cultural identity on purchase tronic Commerce Research and Applications,
intention. Fourth, the research does not accommodate vol. 19, pp. 70–84, 2016.
other determinant variables, such as risk, gamification, [11] M. R. Alam, M. A. Faiz, and M. Z. Aftab,
or social media marketing. Future researchers should “Mobile marketing: A study of buying intention,”
explore those variables to achieve a better understand- Journal of Economics, Management and Trade,
ing of purchase behavior in e-commerce. vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 218–226, 2015.
[12] S. Bebber, G. S. Milan, D. De Toni, L. Eberle, and
L. A. Slongo, “Antecedents of purchase intention
R EFERENCES
in the online context,” Journal of Relationship
[1] Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. Marketing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 82–98, 2017.
(2017) Hasil survei penetrasi dan perilaku [13] S. Singh and S. Srivastava, “Moderating effect
pengguna Internet Indonesia 2017. [Online]. of product type on online shopping behaviour
Available: https://www.apjii.or.id/survei and purchase intention: An Indian perspective,”
[2] Databoks. (2017) 2011-2015, nilai transaksi Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–
e-commerce Indonesia melonjak 250 persen. 27, 2018.
[Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/2FJBHVE [14] T. Escobar-Rodrı́guez and R. Bonsón-Fernández,
[3] C. Dan, “Electronic commerce: State-of-the-art,” “Analysing online purchase intention in Spain:
American Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 4, Fashion e-commerce,” Information Systems and
no. 4, pp. 135–141, 2014. E-Business Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 599–
[4] World Trade Organization. (2018) Elec- 622, 2017.
tronic commerce. [Online]. Avail- [15] G. Jordan, R. Leskovar, and M. Marič, “Impact of
able: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto e/ fear of identity theft and perceived risk on online
minist e/mc11 e/briefing notes e/bfecom e.htm purchase intention,” Organizacija, vol. 51, no. 2,
[5] S. Agrawal and S. Abhinav Sareen, “Flash sales- pp. 146–155, 2018.
The game changer in Indian e-commerce indus- [16] F. Ali, “Hotel website quality, perceived flow,
try,” International Journal of Advance Research customer satisfaction and purchase intention,”
and Innovation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 192–195, 2016. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology,
[6] E. B. Prasetyo and F. Zen, “The effect of dis- vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 213–228, 2016.
count price on purchasing intentions through con- [17] N. A. Rozekhi, S. Hussin, and A. M. Noor,
sumer’s perceived risk in the flash sale program “Attributable e-commerce toward purchase inten-
at shopee,” in 4th Padang International Con- tion: Osnline search of food product,” The SIJ
ference on Education, Economics, Business and Transactions on Industrial, Financial & Business
Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2019). West Sumatera, Management (IFBM), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 128–134,
Indonesia: Atlantis Press, Nov. 16–17, 2020, pp. 2014.
633–643. [18] Juniwati, “Influence of perceived usefulness, ease
[7] K. A. Vakeel, K. Sivakumar, K. Jayasimha, and of use, risk on attitude and intention to shop
S. Dey, “Service failures after online flash sales: online,” European Journal of Business and Man-
Role of deal proneness, attribution, and emotion,” agement, vol. 6, no. 27, pp. 218–229, 2014.
Journal of Service Management, vol. 29, no. 2, [19] N. Laura, “The effect of trust and service quality
pp. 253–276, 2018. toward patient satisfaction with customer value
[8] F. D. O. Santini, C. H. Sampaio, M. G. Perin, as intervening variable,” Binus Business Review,
and V. A. Vieira, “An analysis of the influence of vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2016.
discount sales promotion in consumer buying in- [20] Renny, S. Guritno, and H. Siringoringo, “Per-
tent and the moderating effects of attractiveness,” ceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitude to-
Revista de Administração (São Paulo), vol. 50, wards online shopping usefulness towards online
no. 4, pp. 416–431, 2015. airlines ticket purchase,” Procedia-Social and Be-
[9] M. Dachyar and L. Banjarnahor, “Factors in- havioral Sciences, vol. 81, pp. 212–216, 2013.
fluencing purchase intention towards consumer-
71
Cite this article as: A. M. Sundjaja, G. V. Arisanto, and S. Fatimah, “The Determinant Factors of
E-Commerce Usage Behavior During Flash Sale Program”, CommIT (Communication & Information
Technology) Journal 14(2), 65–72, 2020.
[21] R. K. Ekawati, “Peran mediasi sikap atas pen- [32] D. L. Kasilingam, “Understanding the attitude
garuh kepercayaan terhadap niat menggunakan and intention to use smartphone chatbots for
Instagram,” Jurnal JuSiTik (Jurnal Sistem In- shopping,” Technology in Society, vol. 62, no.
formasi dan Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi), August, 2020.
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2017. [33] M. Rizwan, S. M. Umair, H. M. Bilal, M. Akhtar,
[22] N. Hongyao, “Online purchase intention in B2C and M. Bhatti, “Determinants of customer inten-
e-commerce: An empirical study,” in The Twelfth tions for online shopping: A study from Pak-
Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, istan,” Journal of Sociological Research, vol. 5,
Wuhan, China, May 25–26, 2013, pp. 482–489. no. 1, pp. 248–272, 2014.
[23] J. V. Chen, D. Rungruengsamrit, T. Rajkumar, [34] B. C. Shia, M. Chen, A. D. Ramdansyah, and
and D. C. Yen, “Success of electronic commerce S. Wang, “Comparison of decision making in
web sites: A comparative study in two countries,” adopting e-commerce between Indonesia and
Information & Management, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. Chinese Taipei (Case study in Jakarta and Taipei
344–355, 2013. City),” American Journal of Industrial and Busi-
[24] E. Supriyati, “Studi empirik social commerce (s- ness Management, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 7480–768,
commerce) dari sudut pandang kualitas website,” 2015.
Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu [35] S. B. Yudhoatmojo and R. Ramadana, “Analysis
Komputer, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 2015. on gamification features usage on Indonesia e-
[25] J. Jiménez-Barreto and S. Campo-Martı́nez, commerce sites using Octalysis Framework,” in
“Destination website quality, users’ attitudes and The 2nd International HCI and UX Conference in
the willingness to participate in online co-creation Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, April 13–15, 2016,
experiences,” European Journal of Management pp. 1–5.
and Business Economics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 26–
41, 2018.
[26] A. M. Sundjaja and A. F. Komala, “The determi-
nant factors of the intention to purchase online car
insurance,” International Journal of Scientific &
Technology Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 511–517,
2019.
[27] D. J. Kim, D. L. Ferrin, and H. R. Rao, “A
trust-based consumer decision-making model in
electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived
risk, and their antecedents,” Decision Support
Systems, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 544–564, 2008.
[28] M. Zendehdel, L. H. Paim, and S. B. Os-
man, “Students’ online purchasing behavior in
Malaysia: Understanding online shopping atti-
tude,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 2,
no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015.
[29] V. Singh and S. K. Sharma, “Analyzing the mod-
erating effects of respondent type and experience
on the fuel efficiency improvement in air transport
using Structural Equation Modeling,” European
Transport Research Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–
20, 2016.
[30] F. M. Andrews and A. R. Herzog, “The quality
of survey data as related to age of respondent,”
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
vol. 81, no. 394, pp. 403–410, 1986.
[31] H. Y. Kim, “Statistical notes for clinical re-
searchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using
skewness and kurtosis,” Restorative Dentistry &
Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 52–54, 2013.
72