Research Study
Research Study
Research Study
Learning Objectives
At the end of this chapter, the reader should be able to:
discuss the different types of research design
differentiate the types of sampling design
explain the different method of data collection and data analysis
Research experts have different views about the definition of research design. Based on these
views, research design appears to be a scheme that maps out the source of data, the type of data
to be collected, how the data will be collected, and the methods to be used in data analysis. The
plan also pinpoints specifically the relationship of the variables under study. A good research
design must also set time constraints within which the research problem should be answered.
A multifaceted concept, research design may be classified in terms of the purpose of the
study, timeframe, scope of the problem, data requirement, and method of data collection. The
type of business research design includes descriptive, exploratory, causal/explanatory,
correlational, comparative, evaluative, experimental, and action research. An undertaking may
adopt more than one research design.
The study entitled “Perceived Strength and Weaknesses of Solidbank Corporation’s Job
Rotation Program” used a descriptive research design as presented below:
The study utilized a descriptive research design, the purpose f which was to capture the
relevant issues that surround job rotation. Its other purpose was to obtain the respondents’
perceived strengths and weaknesses of the job rotation program with regard to promotion
opportunities, opportunity for personal growth, recognition, responsibility, achievement,
quality of supervision, pay, company policies, physical working conditions, relation with
others, and job security.
A five-point Likert scale survey questionnaire was used to obtain the data.
The research design of the investigation entitled “An In-depth Study of the Situation of
Women Trade Unionists in the Philippines” is described as follows:
The research problem and objectives posed at the beginning of the study were answered
through a descriptive research design. The design focused on describing the women
union workers’ personal profile, profile on family, community, work, politics and union-
related data.
In the women workers’ profile, analysis of patterns to describe their age, civil status,
educational attainment, average monthly income and their socio-economic conditions
was made.
In their family-related profile, roles, decision-making and family relationships were
analyzed. Respondents also cited the difficulties encountered in portraying both family
and work roles through an open-ended statement.
With their work-related data, there was an analysis to describe workers’ length of
service in the company, number of promotions, and ways of getting hired in the
companies. The existence of discrimination in their company was also discussed.
With their union-related data, there were open-ended questions related to their positions
in the union, number of years in the union, ways of participation, and their level of
assessment of the union and their union leaders.
In the study that seeks to find out the applicability of virtual offices in Philippine companies,
the research design can be presented as follows:
The study made use of exploratory research to find out the potential of having virtual
offices in Philippine companies. Virtual offices are being employed in other countries by
a few companies. Some articles have also been written about the advantages and
disadvantages of implementing such setup. However, no research has yet been made on
its applicability or on the perceptions of executives regarding the matter. The proponents
used exploratory research to narrow the scope of the research topic into defined ones. It
was not intended to provide conclusive evidence, but rather to examine it further so as to
provide directions for future research.
Another exploratory research design on Green Marketing can be stated this way:
The extent by which marketing executives understand “Green Marketing” has not been
examined as much in studies made. That is the reason why the exploratory research
design was employed for this study. The study is geared towards investigating the
concept of green marketing as understood and practiced by marketing executives in their
companies.
3. Causal/Explanatory Research is carried out to ascertain that the occurrence of, or change
in, the independent variables. In the statement of specific objectives, some of the appropriate
verbs to use are analyze, explain, and identify.
The study entitled “Product Optimization for the Philippine Tourism Industry” made use
of the causal research design as shown below:
The plan and structure of the investigation were conceived along marketing research’s
concept testing procedure which relies on concept evaluation and positioning by market
segments.
The investigation was divided into two parts–the perceptual side and the choice of the
total tourist product.
Since the focus of part one (demand) is accurate description of variables and
specification of a functional relationship between them, descriptive research was utilized.
In part two, it was necessary to use the causal approach because, in product
conceptualization, the main concern is knowing how one variable affects or is responsible
for the changes in another variable. To understand such influences, it is necessary to
manipulate or change the variables representing attributes of interest and observe the
concomitant variation in the preference.
Another study that made use of the causal research design is entitled “The Effects of Quality
Circles in Company E”, as presented below:
The research used is the causal method which was pertinent in gathering salient data on
the effects of quality control as a business management strategy applied in company E.
The causal method takes into account all important aspects of employing such business
strategy technique to determine its effects. The researcher used the causal method
because it probes deeply and analyzes interaction between the manager and the workers.
In addition to that, the study employed various data probing technique to arrive at an
impartial assessment and understanding of the study.
4. Correlational research is conducted to establish the fact that the outcome of certain
patterns of relationship occur together in a specified manner without suggesting that one
variable causes the other variable causes the other variable to change. In this design,
relationship is also clearly identified as positive or negative correlation. The most
appropriate word to use in starting specific objectives is correlative or interrelate.
The study entitled “Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics and Financial
Performance: A Canonical Analysis and Empirical Investigation of Top United States
Manufacturing Firms in the Philippines” presented its design as follows:
The correlation design was used for two reasons. One was to establish the degree that
the indicator variables are associated to one another, to attest whether the theorized
autonomy of these variables is supported by the data. And the other reason was to
describe in quantitative terms the extent to which the scanning variables were related to
one another, both to test hypothesis and to determine the make-up of the ensuing analysis.
Correlational research design is used in the study, “The Exchange Rate Pass-Through in the
Philippine Manufacturing Industries: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Magnitude of Exchange
Rate Elasticities with the Degree of Product Differentiation, Elasticity of Marginal Cost and
Market Share ”, as presented below:
The study employed the correlational research design with the use of two-stage
regression to answer the research problems and objectives posed at the beginning of the
study.
The first stage regression focused on determining the correlation between the monthly
movement of the exchange rate and the variation on the producer’s price index per
manufacturing industry. A time-series regression analysis was used to get the significant
coefficient for the slope for each exchange rate pass-through to be used as variable for the
second stage regression.
On the other hand, the second stage regression used a cross-sectional analysis between
the exchange rate pass-through (coefficient of ER from the first stage regression) against
the three parametric models, namely: the degree of the product differentiation, the
elasticity of marginal cost and the foreign firm’s share in the industry. The second-stage
regression mainly delved on measuring the magnitude of the pass-through by setting the
responsiveness of each parameter to the pass-through.
The paper, “A comparative Study Between the Japanese Principles of Personnel Management
and the Actual Practice in a Philippine-Based Japanese Company” presented its research design
as follows:
The study the researchers made was basically descriptive in nature, and more
specifically, a comparative one. In this context, the researchers’ aim was to compare the
principles of Japanese Personnel Management with that of Pilipinas Nissan Company
Incorporated. The researchers agreed that among the various Japanese car-manufacturing
companies here in the Philippines, Pilipinas Nissan Inc. would serve as the basis of the
said comparison.
The point of comparison would be the features of the Japanese way of personnel
management such as recruitment and hiring, training, job description, promotion and
advancement, and duration of employment.
The paper “Human Resources Management Practices of Small, Medium and Large
Enterprises in Metro Manila” employed the descriptive and comparative designs, as shown
below:
The descriptive and comparative research designs were employed to answer the research
problems and objectives posed at the beginning of the study.
The descriptive design focused on describing the trends of the sample companies’
HRM-implemented policies, programs and activities related to procurement,
compensation, development, integration, maintenance and separation. There was also an
analysis of patterns to describe the characteristics of the companies such as years of
operation, nature of business, size ownership, unionization, and level of profit.
On the other hand, the comparative design delved on determining the differences or
similarities in the enterprises’ HRM practices using their company characteristics as the
basis of comparison. The comparative analysis also attempted to identify significant
correlations of the variables under study.
The paper, “An Assessment of the Business Management Program of the DLSU as perceived
by the Business Management Graduates of School Year 1981–1985” used both descriptive and
comparative designs, as presented below:
The study made use of the descriptive and, partly comparative research designs. Trend
and patterns of BM graduates’ perception of the BM program were presented and
analyzed and these initial findings were compared between pure Commerce-BM
graduates and LIACOM-BM graduates.
The feedback of companies that hire DLSU BM graduates were also shown.
Illustrative of the evaluative research design is the paper entitled “An Assessment of the
Skills Needed by the Finance Sector in Relation to the Management of Financial Institution
Curriculum of De La Salle University”, as shown next page:
Currently, providing quality service to customers is the number one mode of fighting
the stiff competition in the business. This study was done to evaluate Kodak’s Delivery
service. The different factors that were discussed under this study are the timing of
delivery, condition of the product, accuracy and documentation of the products,
completeness, and attitude of the delivery personnel. These factors were evaluated to
determine the strength and weaknesses of the company’s delivery service. This evaluative
research design was utilized to investigate potential opportunities or problems.
The study “Reflections on the Road Travelled – A study on the Gender Program of LEARN”
also made use the descriptive and evaluative research designs, as shown below:
The descriptive and evaluative research designs were employed to answer the research
objectives posed at the beginning of the study.
The descriptive design focused on illustrating the profile of the respondents, CBA
provisions on gender concerns, and the development of the LEARN gender program
during the past 6 years.
On the other hand, the evaluative design delved on determining the effects/impact of
the gender education program both on the individual participants and on their unions.
The excerpt that follows was taken from the paper, “Interpersonal Relationship Skills
Building Program: An Experimental Study.”
This study used the experimental method of research to assess the effectiveness of the
Interpersonal Relationship Skills and Teambuilding Program conducted by the company.
The experimental design was the pretest-posttest control group design which takes the
following form:
(E) R O1 X O2
(C) R O3 O4
where:
R = random selection and distribution of subjects
E = experimental group having treatment
C = control group having no treatment
O1 = Interpersonal Relationship Skills Inventory (IRSI)
O3 = Interpersonal Communication Inventory (ICI)
X = treatment (Interpersonal Relationship Skills and Teambuilding Program)
O2 = Interpersonal Relationship Skills Inventory (IRSI)
O4 = Interpersonal Communication Inventory (ICI)
model will be recommended to address the problem of below breakeven capacity during
the said period leads to other concerns, such as delayed flights, cancellations of flight,
and transfer of passengers to other airlines. After constructing a model, the group made a
program that would solve the model constructed. The program was made in order to
visualize the effectiveness of the solution to the program. The program will determine the
precise scheduling in order to minimize losses resulting from below break-even capacity
flights. Lastly, before implementing the solution, the group presented the advantages and
disadvantages of the said model by constructing cost-benefit analysis.
A study called “Financing Higher Education” used action research design, as presented below:
The study employed action research design so as to enable the Commission on Higher
Education to formulate policies and standards to foster quality in higher education related
to:
1. Subsidy to private Higher Education Institutions;
2. Budget allocation scheme for public Higher Education Institutions;
3. Institutional cost;
4. Prioritization of resource allocation to various programs of public Higher Education
Institutions;
5. Cost of program by mode of delivery–formal or alternative;
6. Rationalization of tuition and other school fees, and;
7. Allocation of scholarship grants and slots for student and faculty.
The rationalization of these policies will make the generation and allocation of
resources more efficient and responsive to the needs of the Filipinos and the country.
4.2 Sampling
Sampling is the process of choosing adequate and representative elements from the
population. By studying the sample, the researcher is able to draw insights and conclusions for
the entire population.
In data gathering, sampling has many advantages over census or total enumeration. Aside
from being able to generalize the findings for the entire population, the researcher also able to
save in terms of time, effort, and cost. Sampling makes the scope of the study manageable
because of the small number of respondents to be covered, and increase the likelihood of
obtaining more reliable and accurate result.
For the reliability, samples, however, must meet the criteria of adequacy and
representativeness. Adequacy refers to the sample size (n), while representativeness pertains to
the possession of the characteristics of the sample as specified characteristics of the population.
The adequate number of elements to be taken as samples is based on the desired confidence level
(alpha:α) and room for error (e) in selecting the correct sample. In the academe, the most
common confidence levels employed in thesis and dissertation sample size computations are .01,
.05, and .10. The higher the confidence level desired, the bigger the sample size should be.
Statistics books contain different formulae in determining the sample size. However based on
actual experience, this formula which came from the Philippine Social Science Council Survey
Series (Publication Number 2) comes very handy:
n=
where:
1. at 95% confidence level Z α/2 = 1.96
at 90% confidence level Z α/2 = 1.65
at 99% confidence level Z α/2 = 2.58
2. Assume proportion p=0.5
(as preliminary estimate)
3. Sampling error E normally assumes the
values: 0.025; 0.05, 0.10
The foregoing formula is often used for sample size determination in research involving
proportions (e.g., proportion of respondents willing to buy the products at a specific price,
proportion of satisfied employees.) As Vasquez(1997) pointed out, the formula is applicable to a
“finite population (or to one where sampling is done without replacement, as in simple random
sampling which is binomial or dichotomous in nature.” Since most business research studies
involve proportions, the said formula is often used.
Sample sizes for different population size were computed based on the foregoing formula to
come up with the table in Appendix A which could help the researcher in determining the sample
size (n) requirement of a given study, by simply referring to this table.
As a process, sampling involves these steps:
Sampling designs are commonly classified into probability and nonprobability sampling.
Probability sampling gives each element of the population a known and equal chance to be
included as a sample, while nonprobability sampling does not provide this predetermined chance.
Probability is used when inferences about the population are required, as in thesis, dissertation or
other academic researches. Nonprobability sampling is usually adopted when immediate
feedback is needed, as in marketing research studies, such as product launching. Specific
sampling techniques or procedures under each design are available to researchers (see figure 12).
Choice of technique is based on study objectives and hypothesis, the extent to which
generalizations are to be made, and cost and time limitations.
Random Sampling affords each element in the population an equal and known
chance of being chosen as a respondent. The selection of the respondent can be done with the use
of the random table (refer to Appendix B), or a software program, by calculator, or through
lottery. The complete list of the population frame, e.g., list of registered small and medium
enterprises in the National Capital Region, list of the Top Corporations in the Philippines, list of
all residents in a particular village, and list of all regular rank-and-file employees on a firm, must
be available for use in simple random sampling.
Here are examples how random sampling is used.
EXAMPLE 1
This study aims to assess the effect of the currency crisis on the financial performance
of top corporations in the Philippines. The study made use of random sampling to give
each of the corporations on the Top 100 list for 1993 an equal chance of being included
in the sample. Based on appendix A, a population (N) equal to 100 necessities n = 79
samples for a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 0.05.
The following steps are to be followed in the selection of the sample:
1. Use the table of Random Numbers (Refer to Appendix B) in selecting 79 samples.
A row and three columns from the table of random numbers will be chosen as
starting point At random, row 1 and columns 10 to 12 are chosen.
2. Using Appendix B, go down columns 10 to 12 from row 1, selecting the first 9
distinct numbers between 1 and 100.
3. Continue to the next rows and columns (13 to 15, 16 to 18 and so on) until all 79
distinct random numbers are chosen.
4. These 79 random numbers represent the rank of companies chosen based on the
Top 100 list (Refer to Appendix C) chosen to be included in the sample.
For purposes of illustration, below are the first 10 numbers and companies chosen at
random.
RANDOM NUMBERS/
RANK OF COMPANY COMPANY
CHOSEN
*Based on Appendix C
EXAMPLE 2
This research was undertaken to determine how company employees react to news of
possible reorganization to adapt to market environment changes. Simple random
sampling was used to be able to select samples based on an alphabetical listing of the 350
employees. A sample size of 183 was derived through the use of the following formula:
n= = = 183
For illustration purposes, the following are the first 10 significant random numbers that
came up through the use of the calculator as well as employees chosen as respondents
based on the list in Appendix D.
Systematic Sampling allows the elements of the population to be selected as respondent
by using a constant number (k) derived from dividing the total population (N) by the
computed sample size (n). The formula is k = . Similar to random sampling, the
availability of the list of the population frame is necessary to apply this technique.
EXAMPLE
This study employed systematic sampling. The said method was chosen for two
reasons: (1) the population under study that includes all households in Sunrise Village is
described as heterogeneous in relation to the area under study, which aims at assessing
the feasibility of establishing a new meatshop in the area; and (2) an available listing of
homeowners, arranged according to block, made systematic sampling easy to execute.
To implement the systematic sampling method, two items need to be derived: (1) the
sampling interval (k) and (2) the random start (value between 1 to k). There are 1,600
houses in the population (N), therefore we obtain a sample size of 310 (based on
Appendix A). The sampling interval (k) was computed as:
a) replacement in the first instance is the house before the house selected (House
Number 9) and second instance is the house after the house selected (House 26) and
so on.
b) replacement through flipping a coin (head-house before; tails-house after).
Stratified Sampling helps in the selection of respondents where there are already
identifiable subgroups or strata of elements within the population which are of interest to the
researcher. A good example is when the research design is basically comparative in nature,
where the main objective is determining similarities or differences. Once the stratification
was made, the final respondents can then be selected either by random or systematic
sampling using proportionate or disproportionate number of elements. Stratifying the
population based on variables such as gender, age, income level, size of company, nature of
businesses, ownership of firm, establishes the homogeneity within each subgroup so that
clear differences between groups are determined.
Samples from each stratum were selected through random sampling, making use of the
Table of Random Numbers and the listing of employees grouped by level/position. A
major consideration in the choice of stratified random sampling the characteristic of the
population itself of having homogeneous groups for each stratum or subpopulation as
well as the sampling method’s applicability to the nature of the problem that the study
would want to focus on.
Random Sampling was used in the selection of samples for each stratum.
Analysis of the above table indicates that on the level of senior and middle
management, the 9 respondents may not truly represent their group. The sample size is
therefore too small. In this case, disproportionate allocation may be more appropriate.
Sound judgment may point to the following recomputations of sample size per stratum.
Cluster Sampling involves the grouping od division of the elements of the population
into heterogeneous groups. Then some of these groups are randomly selected and all the
elements of the cluster are studied. It should be noted that each cluster sample is composed
of respondents with different perspectives and interests. This way of selecting is deemed lees
costly. Some normally occurring clusters in business research are clusters of managers,
customers, suppliers, stock brokers, investors, accountants, and advertisers. Since the
elements do not have much differences among them, it appears that the results show less
precision.
Here is an example of cluster sampling.
The company has implemented Total Quality Management through the creation of 98
quality circles made up of 10 people each representing employees from different sectors
in the Production Department. This made sure that each quality circle is well-represented
in terms of issues that can be raised during quality-circles meetings. The Production
Manager would want to assess the effectiveness of Total Quality Management along
different sections on his department. To be able to do this, the study made use of cluster
sampling for its sampling method. The choice of this particular method was based on the
characteristic of each cluster (quality circle), which is heterogeneous. Each cluster of
quality circle represents all employees from different sections.
Based on a population of 975 employees, a sample size of 276 was obtained. This,
therefore, resulted in the selection of 28 quality circles. A list was made of all 98 quality
circles, and 28 quality circles were interviewed and considered in the study.
Area Sampling pertains to the grouping of the population into geographical divisions
before selecting the respondents. This sampling can be done if there exist a clear delineation
of communities where the respondents can be found. Common sampling areas are villages,
subdivisions, cities, and municipalities.
Here is an illustration of how area sampling is undertaken.
The study made use of area sampling for its sampling method. The study aims to
determine extent of usage of Direct Distance Dialing service among 10,000 households in
375 blocks of houses in interconnected villages in Laguna. The said population is known
to be heterogeneous based on previous studies made. Area sampling was used by (1)
randomly selecting the blocks to be included in the study and (2) randomly selecting the
elements from each of the blocks.
From 375 blocks, 190 blocks (2,850 households) were chosen in the sample (based on
appendix A). From 190 blocks, again random sampling was used to get a sample size of
370 (based on appendix A, N = 10,000).
To get the number of samples to be selected from each of the blocks, the number of
houses per block was taken into consideration. The number of samples from each block is
proportional to block size (e.g. Block 23 was chosen among 190 blocks to be sampled
and it has a total number of 25 households which is 0.88% of 370 is 3, three households
were randomly chosen for block 23. The same pattern of computation was followed for
other blocks.).
Double Sampling means getting a smaller sample from the initial large sample. This
design is sometimes called sample within a sample. Double sampling is usually done when
the researcher intends to gather more in-depth and focused data on the topic of investigation.
The initial larger sample provides preliminary information which helps in determining the
second sample set to be drawn from the same sample group.
Here are some examples.
EXAMPLE 1
In the absence of current information on the household size of those residing in Sun
Valley Subdivision, the proponents of this study decided to employ double sampling
method. Household size is very crucial to the study whose objective was to compare the
differences in effects of the economic crisis on household expenditure patterns of
households of size 5 members and less and that of 6 members and more. Simple random
sampling was done first. Based on the population of 500 households, the sample size
obtained was 217. Samples were selected through the use of the Table of Random
Numbers. From this initial example, a survey was made on 217 households selected by
random sampling. Data on household size was obtained along with other data needed for
the study.
After obtaining the said data, estimates were made regarding proportion of households
classified by size as shown in columns 1 to 3 of Table 1.
Stratification was employed, while proportional allocations and sample size were
computed for the second phase of sampling as shown in column 4 of Table 1.
Table 1
Estimated Sample Size for Sun Valley Subdivision,
By Household Size
Based on proportional allocation and sample size, 139 samples were selected from the
initial 217 samples to make the analysis more relevant based on the objectives of the
study. There were 81 households with 5 members or less and 58 households with 6
members or more considered for the study.
EXAMPLE 2
The researcher wanted to know the assessment of retailers regarding the liberalization
of the retail industry. Random sampling was initially used among retailers in Metro
Manila. During the first phase of the study, awareness regarding the issue was first
determined as well as the general profile of retailers through a self-administered
questionnaire. Through the results of the initial phase, the researcher was able to identify
the retailers who had high awareness of the issue. There was a total of 82 retailers who
had high awareness in the issue. In the second phase of sampling therefore, sampling,
was made among these 82 retailers. Due to the cost constraints, the proponents were only
able to conduct interviews among 30 samples. Random sampling was conducted to select
the 30 samples for the second phase of the study.
Multi-Stage Sampling is cluster sampling done in several stages. This type is usually
used in nationwide surveys, which each region, province, city, municipality, or barangay is
subdivided and selected, before the actual respondents are chosen.
EXAMPLE 1
A nationwide survey will be undertaken for a study to assess and measure the extent of
unemployment among Filipino households. To be able to achieve this, a multi-stage
sampling is appropriate for the selection of sampling units (for this study, it is the
provinces/municipalities within the region chosen). Secondary sampling units are the
towns/municipalities. Tertiary sampling units are the barangays within the
towns/municipalities chosen, while the ultimate sampling units are the households.
Below is the table showing the population sizes of every region.
NCR
CAR Metro Manila 10 1,765,644 14.21
I Northern Luzon 6 241,204 1.94
II Ilocos 4 706, 263 5.68
III Cagayan Valley 5 523,098 4.21
IV Central Luzon 11 1,274,646 10.26
V Southern Tagalog 15 1,731,396 13.93
VI Bicol 6 877,895 7.07
VII Western Visayas 7 1,133,399 9.12
VIII Central Visayas 6 952,353 7.66
IX Eastern Visayas 5 693,679 5.58
X Western Mindanao 4 508,768 4.09
XI Northern Mindanao 9 734,195 5.91
XII Southern Mindanao 7 887,145 7.14
ARMM Central Mindanao 6 395,243 3.18
Autonomous Region of 4 330,016 2.66
TOTAL Mindanao
12,424,928 100.0
0
*Based on 1994 census
Based on this table N = 12,424,928. Computations based on the formula that we have
been using lead to a sample size of 384. After getting the population and sample size, we
obtain the sampling fraction, which is:
f= = =
This sampling fraction would be used in the selection of households. This indicates that
assuming equal overall probabilities of selection, the rate is 1: 32,357.
Based on the first table shown, a possible grouping into domains can be based on
proximity and sample sizes so that we have the following domains and first-stage
selection probabilities.
Domain 1,621,34
8 0
X
XI
TOTAL
First-stage selection probabilities were obtained based on sample sizes per region per domain. It
represents the probability of getting the region as representative of the said domain. Selection range was
used in the random sampling method (lottery). To illustrate for Domain 2:
f= = =
Ilocos :
f= = =
Cagayan Valley :
f= = =
In the lottery, the selection range was assigned based on the first-stage selection probabilities. For
example, for Domain 2, the lottery resulted in selecting number 4. This would mean that Ilocos is chosen
as the region to represent Domain 2.
Overall, there is a total of 8 regions representing the 8 domains included in the sample. NCR, Western
Visayas, and Central Luzon are certain to be included in the sample because of their sample sizes.
Later Stages
In the succeeding stages, the basic point is that the product of the first stage and subsequent stage
selection probabilities (second, third, and so on) should result in the same overall fraction, which is
1:32,357 (taken from the computation shown on page 73).
To illustrate, if Ilocos was chosen, then selection of provinces, municipilaties, barangays, and households
in the subsequent stages in the Ilocos region would have the following selection probabilities.
In the next stages, therefore, each region selected should be divided into provinces or municipalities (e.g.,
NCR) in the second stage, barangays in the fourth stage, and finally households in the fifth stage. The
same step done in the initial stage can be used for the subsequent stages. Groupings or stratum (similar to
what was done in selecting domains) can also be made based on certain analytical considerations of the
researchers. In the implementation of the selection process, it is best to consult a sampling expert.
Note: Unequal probabilities of selection may be used. Regarding multistage sampling, the book The
Sample Survey: Theory and Practice by Lininger and Warwick (1975) is a good reference.
EXAMPLE 2
In addition to the first example, national surveys made by National Statistics Office (NSO) have
introductory discussions on publications. NSO uses multistage cluster sampling in its nationwide surveys.
And this is how the multistage cluster sampling was explained:
The sampling design of the 1994 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES) adopted that of the
Integrated Households of the NSO, which used a stratified two-stage cluster sampling.
Domains
The urban and rural areas of each province are the principal domains for the survey. In addition, areas
with 150,000 or more populations as of 1990 are also domains in the survey with urban and rural
dimensions. These include the four cities (Manila, Quezon City, Pasay, and Caloocan) and five
municipalities (Valenzuela, Paranaque, Pasig, Marikina, and Makati) of Metro Manila; other key cities
such as Angeles, Baguio, Cabanatuan, Olongapo, Batangas, Lipa, Lucena, San Pablo, Bacolod, Iloilo,
Cebu, Mandaue, Zamboanga, Butuan, Cagayan de Oro, Davao, General Santos, and Iligan; and key
municipalities such as San Fernando, Pampanga, and Tarlac.
The remaining municipalities of Metro Mnila (Taguig, Mandaluyong, San Juan, Pateros, Las Pinas, and
Muntinlupa) were treated as separate domain known as the other Metro. It should also be mentioned that
in the case of Makati, six exclusive villages were identified and samples were selected using a different
scheme. These villages are the Forbes Park, Bel-Air, Dasmarinas, San Lorenzo, Urdaneta, and
Magallanes.
Because of the creation of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), Marawi City and
Cotobato City were likewise treated as domain.
Sampling Units
The primary sampling units (PSUs) under the sample design are barangays, which were classified as
either urban or rural. Households within each sample barangay comprised the secondary sampling units
(SSUs). Within each domain, a pre-determined number of PSUs (based upon approximately “proportional
to size” sample allocation scheme) was selected at the first stage of sample selection procedure with
probability proportional to size (PPS). Prior to selection, PSUs in each domain were ordered by
population size, creating a secondary (i.e., implicitly) stratification intended to improve the efficiency of
the sample design. Population counts from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing (CPH) were used
as measures of size during first stage sample selection.
Within each PSU selected at the first stage, a predetermined number of households (SSUs) was selected at
the second stage using a systematic random selection procedure with equal procedure with equal
probability. The number of households chosen from each PSU took into account the probability of
selecting the PSU at the first stage such that of each household within the domain had an equal probability
of selection for the survey, that is, the sample was self-weighting within domains.
= x x
where:
Sampling Fraction
In general, the sample design and results in self-weighting samples within domains, with a uniform
sampling fraction of 1:400 for urban and 1:600 for rural areas. However, special areas are assigned
different sampling fractions so as to attain adequate samples for each. Special areas refer to urban and
rural areas of province or large city which are small relative to their counterpart. These special areas and
their sampling fractions are as follows:
Quota Sampling is selecting the predetermined required number from the population
regardless of how they are chosen. This design is usually done in opinion or poll surveys. An
example is shown below.
1) Stratification of the population. Based on previous studies made, the following are
the percentage distribution among different income levels in the municipality: low
income (60%), middle income (30%), and high income (10%).
There are also known areas (barangays and villages) where household of particular
income segments can be found.
3) Selection of samples. Interviews were then conducted among: (a) the first60
respondents from low-income households available for interview and found in the low-
income barangays; (b) the first 30 available respondents from middle-income households
from the middle income villages; and (c) the first 10 available respondents from high-
income households found in high income villages.
A study wanted to conduct an assessment and analysis of the applicability and use of
environmental cost accounting in Philippine industrial companies. Since the topic under
study was very specialized, the researcher opted to use judgment sampling. Judgment
sampling was implemented to select the companies to study, and to select the respondents
from each company. First, industrial companies likely to implement, or are
implementing, environmental cost accounting were selected (e.g., mining, cement,
shipping companies). Second, from these companies, either the Accounting Manager or
the Chief Accountant was selected to become the respondents since they have the
experience and extensive knowledge regarding the matter.
• Convenience Sampling allows the researcher to gather data from respondents who are
conveniently available to provide the necessary information. This design is used to get
information fast.
To illustrate:
EXAMPLE 1
The study wanted to assess customer satisfaction in the Mindanao area, particularly to
owners of the brand new car model launched by the company. There are 456 new car
owners in the area. The selection of the sample was made through convenience sampling
by interviewing all new car owners who dropped by the service center of the company for
maintenance and check-up. The said interviews were done for five successive working
days.
EXAMPLE 2
To assess the effectiveness of a training program a study employed convenience
sampling to get immediate feedback regarding the matter. In a general meeting of the
company, researchers employed convenience sampling by interviewing those who
attended the training program among those who attended the meeting.
• Accidental Sampling implies that the information is collected from respondents who, by
chance or circumstance, are met by the researcher in the process of data gathering.
Here is an example of a situation that used accidental sampling.
The study concerns the perceptions of foreign buyers on Philippine export products.
Accidental sampling was employed by interviewing foreign exporters that the researcher
met by chance during the trade fairs held in the Philippines for the past year.
• Snowball Sampling means choosing initial samples. These samples will then refer
other respondents from whom the same information may be obtained.
Below is an example of snowball sampling.
This research is about the “Perception of Foreign Investors on the Future of the
Philippine Economy”. To do this, the study employed snowball sampling for its method
of sample selection. The researcher initially interviewed a foreign investor with whom he
was able to set an appointment. At the end of the interview the researcher requested to be
referred to respondents whom the first interviewee deems appropriate to answer the same
questions asked of him. The same method was applied for succeeding interviews
conducted.
• Purposive Sampling involves the selection of key informants based on a predetermined set of
criteria. These are people considered to be the most appropriate source of data in terms of the
objectives of the study. To illustrate:
Purposive sampling was used to determine the profile of the households with female
family heads (defined as those who provide financial support to the family, with the
major bulk of household income coming from them). The following steps were
undertaken:
1) Setting of a criteria for the selection of respondents. The respondent is a female
family head of households with household size of 5 or more. She earns equal to or more
than P 120,000.00 a year.
2) Selection of sample based on the preceding criteria.
The researcher has two major options in collecting data: (1) primary data collection
(e.g., survey, observation) and (2) secondary data collection.
4.3.1.1 Survey. The use of survey as a method of data collection has gained popularity over
the years because of the great deal of valuable information on what people think about certain
issues, products, policies, or events. The survey method, if done correctly, is a relatively easy
and quick way of finding out people’s response to the research problem being investigated.
The common survey techniques used in data collection are personal interview, telephone
interview, self-administered questionnaire, mailed questionnaire, and e-mail/Internet. Table 12
presents a brief comparison of each technique. The descriptions on personal interview, telephone
interview, and questionnaire are based on Clover and Balsley (1979).
Interviews or questionnaires may be used when using the survey as data-gathering procedure.
In both cases, a form or a research instrument is used to solicit the responses from individuals.
Table 13 summarizes the comparison.
TYPE DESCRIPTION
Since the questionnaire is widely used in surveys, the following guidelines can help the
researcher in designing a good one.
Content Criteria
Purpose. The items to be included in the form should adequately answer the objectives and
hypothesis of the study. When the respondents’ buying preferences are being measured, the
questions listed should tap the components and elements of the variable. Therefore, the items to
be appropriately included, according to Sedlack and Stanley (1992), must have face validity,
unidimensionality, response variation, and item format. Question then must be related to the
variable being investigated, must assess only one dimension, must generate an array of answers,
and must be stated either in declarative or question form.
Language. The words to be used in the questions should be familiar and nearest to the
respondent’s level of comprehension. The use of jargons and idioms normally used by the
researcher but not by the respondent should be avoided. Words like reengineering, harmonization
of accounts, pareto principle, and horizontal and vertical integration should not be used in a
survey on blue-collar rank and file.
Type of Questions. There are two basic types of questions which can be utilized to solicit
responses. The fixed alternative (structured) and open-ended (unstructured). The fixed
alternative question provides an array of response categories from which the respondent will
choose or base one’s response (s). For instance, the respondent is asked to rate one’s level of job
satisfaction using a five-point Likert Scale, which indicates:
5 4 3 2 1
In another instance, the respondent is asked to encircle one’s frequency of buying blue jeans
from a department store using these choices:
1 Every month
2 Every 2 months
3 Every 3 months
4 Every 4 months
5 Every 6 months
6 Once a year
This type of question is advantageous to use when the set of responses are few, finite, and
clearly delineated. This type enables the respondent to easily recall and make a fast decision
regarding the answer based on choices. Therefore, this type is less time-consuming and easier to
tabulate, especially if the set of alternatives is pre-coded. On the other hand, the fixed alternative
question tends to limit the answer of the respondent to the choices provided in the set. The other
limitation of this type of question is that it cannot be used to probe complex emotions. It cannot
also be used for questions with no finite set of answers.
The open-ended question, however, gives the respondent the opportunity to respond to the
question in the manner one prefers. For instance, the respondents may be asked to cite significant
factors that made their company successful. The respondents may be asked about what they look
for in patronizing a restaurant. Or respondents may be asked about their feelings regarding
management style of their firm. This type of question should be used when the possible answers
are varied, numerous, and can possibly overlap. This type enables the respondent to give answer
based on one’s own perspective, allowing one to probe deeper into one’s emotions. However,
this type of question is time-consuming and requires the development of categories before data
can be tabulated.
Order. The questions should be arranged in a manner which facilitates the respondent’s
replies, avoiding biased responses to the item that follows. Hence, items can be sequenced from
general to specific, easy to difficult, simple to complex, or less serious to more serious
conditions. There are also instances when a filter item is necessary to minimize respondent
difficulties in answering question of which they have no sufficient knowledge. More importantly,
the filter item seeks to segregate respondents who are required to answer a series of question
from those who do not find such items relevant ( Sedlack & Stanley, 1992). For instance, the
researcher wanted to know if a sample of consumers would buy a CD rack. If respondents do not
own CDs, it would be pointless to ask them if they will buy one for themselves. Here the filter
question “Do you own CDs?” will identify those consumers who own CDs from those who do
not. In the sequence of questions, it is also advisable not to put positively and negatively-worded
questions measuring the same dimension of a variable in consecutive order (Sekaran, 1992). To
illustrate two questions, such as the following, are put, one right after the other:
If there is really a need to cross-validate answer consistency, these items should be placed in
different parts of the instrument. Moreover, the researcher sometimes strongly believes that all
the items are equally important and no question will render biased the respondent to any
subsequent item. In this case, the item should be randomly placed using a table of random
numbers ( Sedlack & Stanley, 1992). Lastly, in determining the arrangement of the questions, it
is also recommended to put together or place in the same block, similar or related items
measuring the same variable or set of variables. Within the same block, the other criteria should
be observed by the researcher. Refer to Appendix F for examples.
Measurement. After the items have been developed, it is important to determine the type of
response categories that will be used for fixed alternative questions. The most commonly
adopted response category is the Likert Scale (e.g., 5 – Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3 – Don’t
Know, 2 – Disagree, 1 – Strongly Disagree). Once the response categories have been developed,
it is helpful to code the responses. This process will reduce the time of the respondents in
selecting the answer to establish the validity and reliability of the instrument. Validity pertains to
the ability of the questionnaire to accurately measure what it intends to measure based on the
operational framework. This ability can be established by face or by content validity and
reliability of the instruments. For example, company profit can be measured by deducting total
expenses from total revenue or by computing the ratio of ROI. Reliability pertains to the level of
consistency that a measurement possesses. It means that when a measure is applied repeatedly on
the same set of respondents, similar results will be obtained. One of the most popular tests of
reliability is the test-retest procedure through an experimental design. For instance, take two or
more similar groups of respondents. One is assigned as the experimental group which is given
instructions at two different times (test and retest). The other group is designated as the control
group which is given the instruction only during the retest period. The scores obtained are then
compared.
Other Features
4.3.1.2 Observation. It is possible to collect primary data without directly posing the
questions to the respondents. Such method requires observing people by systematically looking
at behavioral phenomena with the use of one’s senses and or with the aid of a camera, one-way
mirror, and/or recording instrument in observing people.
Observation as a method is advantageous in studies when original data can be collected at the
time it is happening. This method captures the entire event as it unfolds in a natural or man-made
setting when participants ignore more information which they consider common. Some good
examples of situations where observation is beneficial are in researches on consumer reaction
with regards to the taste of a brand new pizza or fried chicken or a new film shown in a
neighboring theater.
Observation, when properly planned and implemented by trained personnel is very valuable
research method. Hence, the researcher can decide whether to use participant or non-participant
observation as an approach. Participant observation enables the researcher to assume a
legitimate social role within the group being investigated, like becoming a member of an
organization that analyzes leadership styles and conflicts. On the other hand, nonparticipant
observation enables the researcher to be detached and need not to become an integral part of the
group under study, like observing consumers in a supermarket when they buy a particular brand
of laundry soap or studying staff behavior during a departmental meeting. In any of these
approaches, the researcher has the choice to whether to make known to the group that a research
is being conducted on them or to conceal the purpose of the research altogether.
However, observation as a method, is time consuming and costly. It requires the researcher to
be physically present in the time of data collection, if a mechanical devise is not used. It is also
possible at the time of data collection; the participant’s behavior may not be normal one just to
accommodate the researcher. Respondents may also be withhold or limit information if they do
not want to cooperate with the observer. This is where the process of “triangulation,” as
endorsed by Webb, et al. (1981) can be used to respond to this situation. This process means that
a combination of different procedures (e.g., interview, observation of nonverbal behavior, and
observation of verbal behavior) from the same group of respondents can strengthen confidence in
one’s results since the data from one procedure can be validated with the data of the other
procedure. For studies of long duration, one way of strengthening the reliability and validity of
the results is to disregard the data in the initial periods if they appear to be different from the rest
of the observed data.
4.3.1.3 Other Data Collection Methods. Aside from the previously discussed methods of
data collection, the researcher can also use the following:
In data collection, the secondary method may be used which involves the acquisition of data
from secondhand sources like statistical publications, census reports, financial statements, annual
reports, brochures, catalogues and other documents and reports. These data are generated or
produced or kept by government agencies, private corporations, business and trade organizations,
labor organizations, educational institutions, and commercial information service groups.
Data analysis involves the application of the appropriate statistical tools to generate results
which can be interpreted meaningfully to answer the research problem posed at the beginning of
the investigation.
The most common problem of a researcher at this stage of the research process is choosing
the most appropriate statistical tool for data analysis. Available books on statistics reveal that the
choice of a particular tool of analysis will depend on the type and level of data, hypothesis
statement, sampling design and the requirements and assumptions of the statistical tools. Figure
15 shows some considerations in data analysis, while Table 14 presents the summary of the
guidelines which help determine the appropriate data analysis tools that can be employed given
the varying conditions in the study.
Table 14 presents statistical tools that can be used depending on the purpose of the study
(descriptive or inferential) and on the methodology used.
Methodology is based on the nature of data and the sampling plan. The following
characteristics of data are considered before analysis:
Data analysis also considers the sampling technique used, i.e., whether the samples were
randomly chosen (using probability sampling techniques) or not. The analysis should also note
whether the sample size is small (n<30) or large (n>30). “Sample groups” that are formed and
analyzed should also be considered data analysis. Sample groups refer to the grouping of
elements of the sample based on certain characteristics (e.g., gender, age groups, civil status).
Table 15. Statistical Software for Data Analysis
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
A simple statistics package originating in
MINITAB™ statistical education and available across a wide
range of computer types. It tis probably the most
popular statistics package and is easy to learn
and fairly flexible.
(Source: http://www.minitab.com)
A statistics package originating in the social
sciences and available across wide range of
computer types. It is particularly suitable for the
analysis of the designed experiments and
regression problems, but is not particularly easy
to learn.
Statistical Capabilities:
(Source: http://www.spss.com)
Statistical Capabilities
(Source: SAS Institute, Inc.)
Source: http://www.wsdinc.com/products
Source: http:///www.ncss.com
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
A statistics software developed by Statsoft,
STATISTICA™ Inc. and runs on Windows system.
Source: qed.econ.queensu.ca/pub/computer
/sware/stat.,html
A statistics package available for
STATGRAPHICS™ PC only which combines statistics and
graphics for data analysis. It is fairly
easy to use and has reasonably wide
range of facilities.
A complete language for the
TSP™ estimation and simulation of
econometric models.
Source: http://www.tspintl.com
Assessment Tasks