SOTA Table: Rheza Mahesa Raharjo 19020189 / BRM-C Supply Chain Modelling

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Rheza Mahesa Raharjo

19020189 / BRM-C
Supply Chain Modelling
Literature Review

This paper is a review for 4 articles written on the previous SOTA Table made by the writer as a
step to comprehend the topic of Supply Chain Modelling for the final thesis. This review will be
delivered in 2 sections, describing thoroughly both differences and similarities from the articles
focusing on Mapping, Modelling, and Sustainability. The discussion will also be followed by
self-recommendation for the writers about what insight should be best taken into the further
research.

1. Mapping Vs. Modelling, which one is more suitable ?


While reading the text from MacCarthy et al., 2022 and Batubara, 2017, writer found similarities
between the graph that is being called as “Map” and “Model”. Those two terms are described by a
set of entities involved in the supply chain system connected with a line. However, the map by
MacCarthy seems to have inconsistency in describing WHO are the actors and HOW are they
connected to each other. One map is illustrated in a more complex way with the information
about each entity’s tier, while the other more simple one only consists of the entity and the flow line
for material and information. On the other hand, the supply chain model by Batubara only
represents entities and lines without any explanation of the flow types in between.

According to an article by Min, modelling in the supply chain is an activity of making a model to be
proposed in order to improve the current supply chain system. A model in the supply chain can be
generated with a specific method or even using IT-related tools so that the objectives (e.g. cost
efficiency, lead time minimization) can be achieved. Meanwhile, a supply chain mapping, on the
other hand, is defined by Roberts as an activity of creating a clear picture of the current supply
chain system. Mapping also helps the organization to raise awareness about how a decision in the
management would impact each stakeholder.

Based on the above analysis, writer decided to choose “Mapping” as the right term to use for the
topic of the final thesis as the main goal of the project is to help the region gain a clear
understanding about how their supply chain system really works. Moreover, understanding
their own supply chain management will open a lot of opportunities for improvement later on, and
that is how the process of making a supply chain model will come in.

2. Assessing Sustainability
A mapping will be useless if it can lead the Bangka Belitung province to sustainability practice. By
creating the SOTA table before, it is clear that two articles by Ivonne Acosta-Alba, et al., 2022 and
by Batubara, 2017 provide some information about how to assess the supply chain sustainability,
namely the VC4D and Rapfish analysis. However, both of those methods surprisingly shared a
similar focus, those are economic, social, environmental, and functional. The only difference
between the two methods is Rapfish separates the resources and technological aspects instead
of keeping them as one in the functional assessment.

According to those references, it can be concluded that Rapfish appears to be the more suitable
one for the measurement of sustainability in the context of writer's final thesis. While VC4D is a
guideline developed by the European Commission and done in Gambia and Mali, the Rapfish
analysis by Batubara is done in Maluku which increases the chance of similarities in most
aspects for the Bangka Belitung project that will be conducted by the writer. However, some
additional features from the research done by Ivonne, especially about the flooding stages for
every season in the area should be considered in the writer’s research so that the analysis can
be more accurate that it will benefit the people of Bangka Belitung even more.

You might also like