Stanley Hauerwas reflects on his response as a Christian pacifist to the September 11th terrorist attacks. He acknowledges the difficulty of responding appropriately given his pacifist convictions. While some argue pacifists have nothing useful to say during wartime, Hauerwas believes nonviolence is necessary for a just politics not based on fear or death. He critiques how America quickly labeled the event an "act of war" to normalize life and seek revenge rather than maintain a thoughtful silence. As a pacifist, Hauerwas feels isolated from most Americans' reaction and defines his primary loyalty as being to God rather than the United States.
Stanley Hauerwas reflects on his response as a Christian pacifist to the September 11th terrorist attacks. He acknowledges the difficulty of responding appropriately given his pacifist convictions. While some argue pacifists have nothing useful to say during wartime, Hauerwas believes nonviolence is necessary for a just politics not based on fear or death. He critiques how America quickly labeled the event an "act of war" to normalize life and seek revenge rather than maintain a thoughtful silence. As a pacifist, Hauerwas feels isolated from most Americans' reaction and defines his primary loyalty as being to God rather than the United States.
Stanley Hauerwas reflects on his response as a Christian pacifist to the September 11th terrorist attacks. He acknowledges the difficulty of responding appropriately given his pacifist convictions. While some argue pacifists have nothing useful to say during wartime, Hauerwas believes nonviolence is necessary for a just politics not based on fear or death. He critiques how America quickly labeled the event an "act of war" to normalize life and seek revenge rather than maintain a thoughtful silence. As a pacifist, Hauerwas feels isolated from most Americans' reaction and defines his primary loyalty as being to God rather than the United States.
Stanley Hauerwas reflects on his response as a Christian pacifist to the September 11th terrorist attacks. He acknowledges the difficulty of responding appropriately given his pacifist convictions. While some argue pacifists have nothing useful to say during wartime, Hauerwas believes nonviolence is necessary for a just politics not based on fear or death. He critiques how America quickly labeled the event an "act of war" to normalize life and seek revenge rather than maintain a thoughtful silence. As a pacifist, Hauerwas feels isolated from most Americans' reaction and defines his primary loyalty as being to God rather than the United States.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10
September 11, 2001: A Pacifist Response
Hauerwas, Stanley, 1940-
The South Atlantic Quarterly, Volume 101, Number 2, Spring 2002, pp. 425-433 (Article) Published by Duke University Press For additional information about this article Access Provided by Baylor University at 12/29/10 2:53AM GMT http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/saq/summary/v101/101.2hauerwas02.html Stanley Hauerwas September 11, 2001: A Pacist Response I want to wiito honostly alout Soptonloi , zoo. But it is not oasy. Evon now, sono nonths altoi that hoiiillo ovont, I nd it haid to know what can lo said oi, poihaps noio dicult, what should lo said. Evon noio dicult, I an not suio loi what oi how I should piay. I an a Chiis- tian. I an a Chiistian pacist. Boing Chiistian and loing a pacist aio not two things loi no. I would not lo a pacist il I woio not a Chiistian, and I nd it haid to undoistand how ono can lo a Chiistian without loing a pacist. But what doos a pacist havo to say in tho laco ol toiioi? Piay loi poaco? I havo no uso loi sontinontality. Indood sono havo suggostod pacists havo nothing to say in a tino liko tho tino altoi Soptonloi , zoo. Tho oditois ol tho nagazino First Things assoit that thoso who in piinciplo opposo tho uso ol nilitaiy loico havo no logiti- nato pait in tho discussion alout how nilitaiy loico should lo usod. 1 Thoy nako this assoition locauso accoiding to thon tho only loin ol paci- sn that is dolonsillo ioquiios tho disavowal ly tho pacist ol any political iolovanco. That is not tho kind ol pacisn I iopiosont. I an a pacist locauso I think nonviolonco is tho nocossaiy Tho South Atlantic Quarterly o:z, Spiing zooz. Copyiight _ zooz ly Duko Univoisity Pioss. 426 Stanley Hauerwas condition loi a politics not lasod on doath. A politics that is not dotoininod ly tho loai ol doath noans no stiong distinction can lo diawn lotwoon poli- tics and nilitaiy loico. Yot I cannot dony that Soptonloi , zoo, cioatos and ioquiios a kind ol silonco. Wo dospoiatoly want to oxplain what happonod. Explanation do- nosticatos toiioi, naking it pait ol oui woild. I loliovo attonpts to ox- plain nust lo iosistod. Rathoi, wo should loain to wait loloio what wo know not, hoping to gain tino and spaco suciont to loain how to spoak without lying. I should liko to think pacisn nanos tho halits and connunity noc- ossaiy to gain tho tino and placo that is an altoinativo to iovongo. But I do not piotond that I know how that is acconplishod. Yot I do knowthat nuch that has loon said sinco Soptonloi , zoo, has loon lalso. In tho ist houis and days lollowing tho lall ol tho towois, thoio was a stunnod silonco. Piosidont Bush ow lion ono salo havon to anothoi, unsuio what had oi was still to happon. Ho was quito litoially in tho aii. I wish ho night havo loon allo to naintain that postuio, lut ho is tho loadoi ol tho lioo woild. Sonothing nust lo dono. Sonothing nust lo said. Wo nust lo in contiol. Tho silonco nust lo shattoiod. Ho know tho Anoiican pooplo nust lo conloitod. Lilo nust iotuin to noinal. So ho said, Wo aio at wai. Magic woids nocossaiy to ioclain tho ovoiy- day. Wai is such noinalizing discouiso. Anoiicans know wai. This is oui Poail Hailoi. Lilo can iotuin to noinal. Wo aio liightonod, and iionically wai nakos us lool salo. Tho way to go on in tho laco ol Soptonloi , zoo, is to nd sonoono to kill. Anoiicans aio, noioovoi, good at killing. Wo olton lail to acknowlodgo howacconplishod wo aio intho ait ol killing. Indood wo, tho Anoiican pooplo, havo locono nastois ol killing. In oui lattlos, only tho onony has to dio. Sono in oui nilitaiy aio onlaiiassod ly oui oxpoitiso in wai naking, lut what can thoy do? Thoy aio lut lollowing oidois. So tho silonco cioatod ly dostiuction was soon shattoiod ly tho nood loi iovongoa iovongo all tho noio unloigiving locauso wo cannot loigivo thoso who owtho planos loi naking us acknowlodgo oui vulnoialility. Tho ag that ow in nouining was soon tiansloinod into a piido-llod thing, tho lloodstainod ag ol victins tiansloinod into tho ag ol tho Anoiican indonitallo spiiit. Wo will piovail no nattoi hownany pooplo wo nust kill to iid ouisolvos ol tho knowlodgo Anoiicans diod as victins. Anoiicans do not dio as victins. Thoy havo to lo hoioos. So tho stock tiadoi who happonod to woik on tho sovonty-socond ooi loconos as hoioic as tho policonon September , : A Pacist Response 427 and tho ionon who woio doing thoii ols. No ono who diod on Sopton- loi , zoo, gots to dio a noaningloss doath. That is why thoii doaths nust lo iovongod. I an a pacist, so tho Anoiican wo cannot lo ny no. But to lo alion- atod lion tho Anoiican wo is not oasy. I an a noophyto pacist. I novoi ioally wantod to lo a pacist. I had loainod lion Roinhold Nioluhi that il you dosiio ustico you had lottoi lo ioady to kill sonoono along tho way. But thon John Howaid Yodoi and his oxtiaoidinaiy look The Politics of Jesus cano along. Yodoi convincod no that il thoio is anything to this Chiistian stu, it nust suioly involvo tho conviction that tho Son would iathoi dio on tho cioss than loi tho woild to lo iodoonod ly violonco. Moioovoi, tho do- loat ol doath thiough iosuiioction nakos possillo as woll as nocossaiy that Chiistians livo nonviolontly in a woild ol violonco. Chiistian nonviolonco is not a stiatogy to iid tho woild ol violonco, lut iathoi tho way Chiistians nust livo in a woild ol violonco. In shoit Chiistians aio not nonviolont locauso wo loliovo oui nonviolonco is a stiatogy to iid tho woild ol wai, lut iathoi locauso laithlul lollowois ol Chiist in a woild ol wai cannot inagino loing anything olso than nonviolont. But what doos a pacist havo to say in tho laco ol tho toiioi Soptonloi , zoo, nanos? I vaguoly knowwhon I ist doclaiod I was a pacist that thoio night lo sono soiious consoquoncos. To lo nonviolont night ovon chango ny lilo. But I do not ioally think I undoistood what that chango night ontail until Soptonloi . Foi oxanplo altoi I doclaiod I was a pacist, I quit sing- ing tho Stai-Spanglod Bannoi. I will stand whon it is sung, paiticulaily at lasolall ganos, lut I do not sing. Not to sing tho Stai-Spanglod Bannoi is a snall thing that ioninds no that ny ist loyalty is not to tho Unitod Statos lut to God and Gods chuich. I conloss it novoi ciossod ny nind that such snall acts night ovoi tho yoais nako ny iosponso to Soptonloi quito dioiont lion that ol tho good pooplo who sing God Bloss Anoiicaso dioiont that I an lolt in saddonod silonco. That dioionco, noioovoi, haunts no. My lathoi was a liicklayoi and a good Anoiican. Ho woikod haid all his lilo and hopod his woik would not only suppoit his lanily, lut also nako sono contiilution to oui connon lilo. Ho hold a wai-ciitical ol inWoild Wai II, so ho was novoi dialtod. Only ono ol his vo liicklaying liothois was inthat wai, lut ho was novoi oxposod to conlat. My lanily was novoi nilitaiizod, lut as Toxans thoy woio good Anoiicans. Foi nost ol ny lilo I, too, was a good Anoiican, assuning that 428 Stanley Hauerwas I owod nuch to tho socioty that onallod no, tho son ol a liicklayoi, to gain a Ph.D. at Yaloovon il tho Ph.D. was in thoology. Ol couiso thoio wasViotnan. Foi nany ol usViotnanwas oxtondodtiain- ing nocossaiy loi tho dovolopnont ol a noio ciitical attitudo towaid tho govoinnont ol tho Unitod Statos. Yot nost ol us ciitical ol tho wai in Viot- nandid not think oui opposition to that wai nado us loss loyal Anoiicans. Indood tho ciiticisns ol tho wai woio lasod on an appoal to tho highost Anoiican idoals. Viotnan was a tino ol gioat tonsion, lut tho politics ol tho antiwai novonont did not ioquiio thoso opposod to tho wai to think ol thonsolvos as lundanontally standing outsido tho Anoiican nainstioan. Most ciitics ol Viotnan(ust as nany that now ciiticizo tho wai in Alghani- stan lasod thoii dissont on thoii adhoionco to Anoiican idoals that thoy lolt tho wai was lotiaying. That lut indicatos why I lool so isolatod ovon anong tho ciitics ol tho wai in Alghanistan. I do not ovon shaio thoii allogianco to Anoiican idoals. So I sinply did not shaio tho ioaction ol nost Anoiicans to tho dostiuc- tion ol tho Woild Tiado Contoi. Ol couiso I iocoil lion nuidoi on such a scalo, lut I hopo I iononloi that ono nuidoi is too nany. That Anoiicans havo huiiiod to call what happonod wai stiikos no as soll-doloating. Il this is wai, thon lin Ladon has won. Ho thinks ho is a waiiioi not a nuidoioi. Just to tho oxtont tho languago ol wai is usod, ho is honoiod. But in thoii huiiy to call this wai, Anoiicans havo no tino loi caiolul disciininations. Whoio doos that loavo no? Doos it noan, as an ostiangod liiond io- contly wioto no, that I disdain all natuial loyaltios that lind us togothoi as hunan loings, ovon sulnitting such loyaltios to a haish and unloigiving standaid? Doos it noan that I spoak as a solitaiy individual, lailing to ac- knowlodgo that oui livos aio intoiwovon with tho livos ol othois, thoso who havo gono loloio, thoso anong whon wo livo, thoso with whon wo idon- tily, and thoso with whon wo aio in Chiistian connunion? Do I ioluso to acknowlodgo ny lilo is nado possillo ly tho gilts ol othois? Do I loisako all loins ol patiiotisn, lailing to acknowlodgo that wo as a pooplo aio lottoi o locauso ol tho saciicos that woio nado in Woild Wai II? To this I can only answoi, Yos. Il you call patiiotisn natuial, I coitainly do disavow that connoction. Such a disavowal, I hopo, doos not noan I an inattontivo to tho gilts I havo iocoivod lion past and piosont noighlois. In iosponso to ny liiond I pointod out that locauso ho, too, is a Chiistian I assunod ho also disdainod sono natuial loyaltios. Altoi all ho had his September , : A Pacist Response 429 childion laptizod. Tho natuial lovo lotwoon paionts and childion is suioly ioconguiod whon childion aio laptizod into tho doath and iosuiioction ol Chiist. Paul says: Do you not knowthat all ol us who havo loon laptizod into Chiist Josus woio laptizod into his doath? Thoioloio wo havo loon luiiod with hin ly laptisn into doath, so that, ust as Chiist was iaisod lion tho doad ly tho gloiy ol tho Fathoi, so wo too night walk in tho nownoss ol lilo. Foi il wo havo loon unitod with hinin a doath liko his, wo will coitainly lo unitod with hin in a iosuiioction liko his. 2 Chiistians olton tond to locus on loing unitod with Chiist in his iosui- ioction, loigotting that wo aio also unitod with hinin his doath. What could that noan il it doos not noan that Chiistians nust lo ioady to dio, indood havo thoii childion dio, iathoi than lotiay tho Gospol? Any lovo not tians- loinod ly tho lovo ol God cannot holp lut lo tho souico ol tho violonco wo poipotiato on ono anothoi in tho nano ol ustico. Such a lovo nay appoai haish and dioadlul liontho poispoctivo ol tho woild, lut Chiistians loliovo such a lovo is lilo-giving not lilo-donying. Ol couiso living a lilo ol nonviolonco nay lo haish. Coitainly you havo to inagino, and poihaps ovonlaco, that youwill havo to watchtho innocont sul- loi and ovon dio loi youi convictions. But that is no dioiont lionthoso that clain thoy would ght a ust wai. Altoi all, tho ust waiiioi is connittod to avoiding any diioct attack on nonconlatants, which night woll noan that noio pooplo will dio locauso tho ust waiiioi iolusos to do an ovil that a good nay cono. Foi oxanplo, on ust-wai giounds tho lonlings ol Hiio- shina and Nagasaki woio cloaily nuidoi. Il you aio soiious alout ust wai, you nust lo ioady to say that it would lo lottoi that noio pooplo diod on tho loachos ol Japan than to havo connittod ono nuidoi, nuch loss tho lonling ol civilian populations. This last olsoivation nay suggost that whon all is said and dono, a paci- st iosponso to Soptonloi , zoo, is ust ono noio voision ol tho anti- Anoiican sontinonts oxpiossod ly what nany considoi to lo tho Anoiican Lolt. I say what nany considoi locauso it is voiy uncloai il thoio is a Lolt lolt in Anoiica. Nowhoio is that noio appaiont than in tho suppoit to tho wai on toiioiisn givon ly thoso who idontily as tho Lolt. Yot nuch has loon nado ol tho inustico ol Anoiican loioign policy that londs a kind ol intolligilility to tho hatiod givon loinon Soptonloi . I anno dolondoi ol 430 Stanley Hauerwas Anoiican loioign policy, lut tho piollonwith such linos ol ciiticisnis that no nattoi how innoial what tho Anoiican govoinnont nay havo dono in tho woild, such innoiality cannot oxplain oi ustily tho attack on tho Woild Tiado Contoi. Anoiican inpoiialisn, olton cololiatod as tho nowglolalisn, is a liight- oning powoi. It is liightoning not only locauso ol tho hain such powoi inicts on tho innocont, lut locauso it is dicult to inagino altoinativos. Pacists aio olton challongod altoi an ovont liko Soptonloi with tho quos- tion, Woll, what altoinativo do you havo to lonling Alghanistan? Such a quostion assunos that pacists nust havo an altoinativo loioign policy. My only iosponso is I do not havo a loioign policy. I havo sonothing lottoia chuich constitutod ly pooplo who would iathoi dio than kill. Indood I loai that alsont a countoiconnunity to challongo Anoiica, lin Ladon has givon Anoiicans what thoy so dospoiatoly noododa wai with- out ond. Anoiica is a countiy that livos o tho noial capital ol oui wais. Wai nanos tho tino wo sond tho youth to kill and dio (naylo in an ooit to assuio ouisolvos tho livos wo load aio woithy ol such saciicos. Thoy kill and dio to piotoct oui lioodon. But what can lioodon noan il tho piino instanco ol tho oxoiciso ol such lioodon is to shop? Tho voiy lact that wo can and do go to wai is a noial nocossity loi a nation ol consunois. Wai nakos cloai wo nust loliovo in sonothing ovon il wo aio not suio what that sonothing is, oxcopt that it has sonothing to do with tho Anoiican way ol lilo. What a gilt lin Ladon has thoioloio givon Anoiica. Anoiicans woio in dospaii locauso wo won tho cold wai. Anoiicans won ly outsponding tho USSR, pioving that wo can wasto noio nonoy on guns than thoy can oi did. But what do Anoiicans do altoi thoy havo won a wai? Tho wai was nocossaiy to givo noial cohoionco. Wo had to coopoiato with ono anothoi locauso wo woio at wai. How can Anoiica nako sonso ol what it noans loi us to lo a pooplo il wo havo no connon onony? Wo woio in a dangoious lunk having nothing lottoi to do than ontoitain ouisolvos with tho soap opoia Bill Clin- ton was. Now wo havo sonothing lottoi to do. Wo can ght tho wai against toiioiisn. Tho good thing, noioovoi, alout tho wai on toiioiisn is it has no ond, which nakos it voiy doultlul that this wai can lo considoiod ust. Il a wai is ust, youi onony nust know loloio tho wai logins what political puiposo tho wai is to soivo. In othoi woids, thoy nood to know lion tho loginning September , : A Pacist Response 431 what tho conditions aio il thoy chooso to suiiondoi. So youcannot ght a ust wai il it is a wai to ond all wais (Woild Wai I oi loi unconditional suiion- doi (Woild Wai II. But a wai on toiioiisn is a wai without linit. Anoii- cans want to wipo this onony o tho laco ol tho oaith. Moioovoi, Anoiica ovon gots to docido who counts and doos not count as a toiioiist. Whichnoans Anoiicans got to havo it any way thoy want it. Sono that aio captuiod, loi oxanplo, aio piisonois ol wai, sono aio dotainoos. No piol- lon. Whon you aio tho liggost kid on tho llock, you can say whatovoi you want to say, ovon il what you say is nonsonso. Wo all know tho ist casualty in wai is tiuth. So tho consoivativos who havo lought tho wai against post- nodoinisn in tho nano ol oloctivo tiuth, tho sano consoivativos that now iulo us, assuno thoy can uso languago any way thoy ploaso. That Anoiicans got to docido who is and who is not a toiioiist noans that this is not only a wai without cloai puiposo, lut also a wai without ond. Fionnowon wo can lo in a poipotual stato ol wai. Anoiica is always at hoi lost whon sho is on poinanont wai looting. Moioovoi, whon oui countiy is at wai, it has no spaco to woiiy alout tho oxtiaoidinaiy inoquitios that constituto oui socioty, no tino to woiiy alout povoity oi thoso paits ol tho woild that aio iavagod ly hungoi and gonocido. Evoiythingcivil liloitios, duo piocoss, tho piotoction ol tho lawnust lo suloidinatod to tho ono gioat noial ontoipiiso ol winning tho unonding wai against toiioiisn. At tho hoait ol tho Anoiican dosiio to wago ondloss wai is tho Anoiican loai ol doath. Tho Anoiican lovo ol high-toch nodicino is lut tho othoi sido ol tho wai against toiioiisn. Anoiicans aio dotoininod to lo salo, to lo allo to got out ol this lilo alivo. On Soptonloi , Anoiicans woio conliontod with thoii woist loaia pooplo ioady to dio as an oxpiossion ol thoii pio- lound noial connitnonts. Sono spoculato such pooplo nust havo choson doath locauso thoy woio dospoiato oi, at loast, thoy woio so dospoiato that doath was pioloiallo to lilo. Yot thoii willingnoss to dio stands in staik con- tiast to a politics that asks ol its nonlois in iosponso to Soptonloi to shop. Ian Buiuna and Vishai Maigalit olsoivo in thoii aiticlo Occidontalisn that lack ol hoioisn is tho hallnaik ol a louigoois othos. 3 Hoioos couit doath. Tho louigoois is addictod to poisonal saloty. Thoy concodo that nuch in an auont, naikot-diivon socioty is nodiocio, lut whon contonpt loi louigoois cioatuio conloits loconos contonpt loi lilo itsoll you know tho Wost is undoi attack. Accoiding to Buiuna and Maigalit, tho Wost (which 432 Stanley Hauerwas thoy point out is not ust tho googiaphical Wost should opposo tho lull loico ol calculating antilouigoois hoioisn, ol which Al-Qaoda is lut ono iopiosontativo, thiough tho noans wo know lostcutting o thoii nonoy supply. Ol couiso, Buiuna and Maigalit do not toll us howthat can lo dono, givon tho nood loi oil to sustain tho louigoois socioty thoy lavoi. Chiistians aio not callod to lo hoioos oi shoppois. Wo aio callod to lo holy. Wo do not think holinoss is an individual achiovonont, lut iathoi a sot ol piacticos to sustain a pooplo who ioluso to havo thoii livos dotoininod ly tho loai and donial ol doath. Wo loliovo ly so living wo ooi oui non- Chiistian liothois and sistois an altoinativo to all politics lasod on tho do- nial ol doath. Chiistians aio acutoly awaio that wo soldon aio laithlul to tho gilts God has givon us, lut wo hopo tho conlossion ol oui sins is a sign ol hopo in a woild without hopo. This noans pacists do havo a iosponso to Soptonloi , zoo. Oui iosponso is to continuo living in a nannoi that wit- nossos to oui loliol that tho woild was not changod on Soptonloi , zoo. Tho woild was changod duiing tho cololiation ol Passovoi in .. . Maik and Louiso Zwick, loundois ol tho Houston Catholic Woikoi Houso ol Hospitality, onlody tho lilo nado possillo ly tho doath and iosuiioc- tion ol Josus. Thoy know, noioovoi, that Chiistian nonviolonco cannot and nust not lo undoistood as a position that is no noio than loing against violonco. Il pacisn is no noio than not violonco, it lotiays tho loin ol lilo to which Chiistians loliovo thoy havo loon callod ly Chiist. Diawing on Nicholas Boidyaov, tho Zwicks iightly olsoivo that tho split lotwoon tho Gospol and oui cultuio is tho diana ol oui tinos, lut thoy also ionind us that ono doos not lioo poisons ly dotaching thonliontho londs that paia- lyzo thon: ono lioos poisons ly attaching thon to thoii dostiny. Chiistian nonviolonco is lut anothoi nano loi tho liiondshipwo loliovo God has nado possillo and constitutos tho altoinativo to tho violonco that giips oui livos. I logan ly noting that I an not suio loi what I should piay. But piayoi olton is a loin ol silonco. Tho lollowing piayoi I hopo doos not diown out silonco. I wioto tho piayoi as a dovotion to login a Duko Divinity School gonoial nooting. I was allo to wiito tho piayoi locauso ol a shoit aiticlo I had ust ioad in tho Houston Catholic Worker ly Joan Vanioi. 4 Vanioi is tho loundoi ol tho Laicho novononta novonont that loliovos God has savod us ly giving us tho good woik ol living with and loaining to lo liionds with thoso tho woild calls iotaidod. I ond with this piayoi locauso it is all I havo to givo. September , : A Pacist Response 433 Gioat God ol suipiiso, oui livos continuo to lo hauntod ly tho spoctio ol Soptonloi , zoo. Lilo nust go on and wo go on kooping on ovon nooting again as tho Divinity School Council. Is this what Baith noant in whon ho said wo nust go on as though nothing has happonod? To go on as though nothing has happonod can sound liko a counsol ol dospaii, ol holplossnoss, ol hopolossnoss. Wo want to act, to do sonothing to ioclain tho way things woio. Which, I guoss, is lut a ionindoi that ono ol tho ioasons wo aio so shockod, so violatod, ly Soptonloi is tho challongo piosontod to oui piidolul piosunption that wo aio in contiol, that wo aio going to got out ol lilo alivo. To go on as though nothing has happonod suioly ioquiios us to acknowlodgo you aio God and wo aio not. It is haid to iononloi that Josus did not cono to nako us salo, lut iathoi ho cano to nako us disciplos, citi- zons ol youi now ago, a kingdon ol suipiiso. That wo livo in tho ond tinos is suioly tho lasis loi oui conviction that you havo givon us all tho tino wo nood to iospond to Soptonloi with snall acts ol loauty and tondoinoss, which Joan Vanioi tolls us, il dono with hunility and con- donco will liing unity to tho woild and lioak tho chain ol violonco. So wo piay givo us hunility that wo nay iononloi that tho woik wo do today, tho woik wo do ovoiy day, is lalso and piotontious il it lails to soivo thoso who day in and day out aio youi snall gostuios ol loauty and tondoinoss. Notes In a Tino ol Wai, First Things (Doconloi zoo. z Ronans o:. New York Review of Books, Januaiy ;, zooz, q;. q Laicho Foundoi Rosponds to Violonco, Houston Catholic Worker, Novonloi o, zoo.