Truss Bridge
Truss Bridge
Truss Bridge
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truss_bridge
Related None
Truss bridge
Design
The nature of a truss allows the analysis of its structure using a few assumptions and the
application of Newton's laws of motion according to the branch of physics known as
statics. For purposes of analysis, trusses are assumed to be pin jointed where the straight
components meet, meaning that taken alone, every joint on the structure is functionally
considered to be a flexible joint as opposed to a rigid joint with the strength to maintain
its shape, and the resulting shape and strength of the structure are only maintained by the
1/23
interlocking of the components. This
assumption means that members of the
truss (chords, verticals, and diagonals)
will act only in tension or compression. A
more complex analysis is required where
rigid joints impose significant bending
loads upon the elements, as in a
Vierendeel truss.
The inclusion of the elements shown is largely an engineering decision based upon
economics, being a balance between the costs of raw materials, off-site fabrication,
component transportation, on-site erection, the availability of machinery, and the cost of
labor. In other cases, the appearance of the structure may take on greater importance and
so influence the design decisions beyond mere matters of economics. Modern materials
such as prestressed concrete and fabrication methods, such as automated welding, and
the changing price of steel relative to that of labor have significantly influenced the design
of modern bridges.
Model bridges
A pure truss can be represented as a pin-jointed structure, one where the only forces on
the truss members are tension or compression, not bending. This is used in the teaching
of statics, by the building of model bridges from spaghetti. Spaghetti is brittle and
although it can carry a modest tension force, it breaks easily if bent. A model spaghetti
bridge thus demonstrates the use of a truss structure to produce a usefully strong
complete structure from individually weak elements.
2/23
Town's lattice truss, was patented, and had the advantage of requiring neither high labor
skills nor much metal. Few iron truss bridges were built in the United States before 1850.
Truss bridges became a common type of bridge built from the 1870s through the 1930s.
Examples of these bridges still remain across the US, but their numbers are dropping
rapidly as they are demolished and replaced with new structures. As metal slowly started
to replace timber, wrought iron bridges in the US started being built on a large scale in the
1870s. Bowstring truss bridges were a common truss design during this time, with their
arched top chords. Companies like the Massillon Bridge Company of Massillon, Ohio, and
the King Bridge Company of Cleveland, Ohio, became well-known, as they marketed their
designs to cities and townships. The bowstring truss design fell out of favor due to a lack
of durability, and gave way to the Pratt truss design, which was stronger. Again, the bridge
companies marketed their designs, with the Wrought Iron Bridge Company in the lead. As
the 1880s and 1890s progressed, steel began to replace wrought iron as the preferred
material. Other truss designs were used during this time, including the camel-back. By the
1910s, many states developed standard plan truss bridges, including steel Warren pony
truss bridges. As the 1920s and 1930s progressed, some states, such as Pennsylvania,
continued to build steel truss bridges, including massive steel through-truss bridges for
long spans. Other states, such as Michigan, used standard plan concrete girder and beam
bridges, and only a limited number of truss bridges were built.
Roadbed types
The truss may carry its roadbed on top, in the middle, or at the bottom of the truss.
Bridges with the roadbed at the top or the bottom are the most common as this allows
both the top and bottom to be stiffened, forming a box truss. When the roadbed is atop
the truss it is called a deck truss (an example of this was the I-35W Mississippi River
bridge). When the truss members are both above and below the roadbed it is called a
through truss (an example of this application is the Pulaski Skyway), and where the
sides extend above the roadbed but are not connected, a pony truss or half-through
truss.
Sometimes both the upper and lower chords support roadbeds, forming a double-decked
truss. This can be used to separate rail from road traffic or to separate the two directions
of road traffic.
Since through truss bridges have supports located over the bridge deck, they are
susceptible to being hit by overheight loads when used on highways. The I-5 Skagit River
bridge collapsed after such a strike; before the collapse, similar incidents had been
common and had necessitated frequent repairs.[2]
Gallery
Pratt through truss of the former Seaboard Air Line Railway, located near the
village of Willow, Florida; abandoned since the mid-1980s
3/23
Deck truss railroad bridge over the Erie Canal in
Lockport, New York
Side view of the iron truss railway bridge over Mura River
in Mursko Središće, Croatia
4/23
Multiple spans
Truss bridges consisting of more than one span may be either a continuous truss or a
series of simple trusses. In the simple truss design, each span is supported only at the
ends and is fully independent of any adjacent spans. Each span must fully support the
weight of any vehicles traveling over it (the live load).
In contrast, a continuous truss functions as a single rigid structure over multiple supports.
This means that the live load on one span is partially supported by the other spans, and
consequently it is possible to use less material in the truss.[3]: 168 Continuous truss bridges
5/23
were not very common before the mid-20th century because they are statically
indeterminate, which makes them difficult to design without the use of computers.
A multi-span truss bridge may also be constructed using cantilever spans, which are
supported at only one end rather than both ends like other types of trusses. Unlike a
continuous truss, a cantilever truss does not need to be connected rigidly, or indeed at all,
at the center.[3]: 169–170 Many cantilever bridges, like the Quebec Bridge shown below,
have two cantilever spans supporting a simple truss in the center. The bridge would
remain standing if the simple truss section were removed.
It has been suggested that this section be split out into another article.
(Discuss) (February 2023)
Bridges are the most widely known examples of truss use. There are many types,[4] some
of them dating back hundreds of years. Below are some of the more common designs.
Allan truss
6/23
was the second Allan truss bridge to be built, the oldest surviving bridge in the Australian
Capital Territory and the oldest, longest continuously used Allan truss bridge.[7][8][9]
Completed in November 1895, the Hampden Bridge in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales,
Australia, the first of the Allan truss bridges with overhead bracing, was originally
designed as a steel bridge but was constructed with timber to reduce cost.[10] In his
design, Allan used Australian ironbark for its strength.[11] A similar bridge also designed
by Percy Allen is the Victoria Bridge on Prince Street, Picton, New South Wales. Also
constructed of ironbark, the bridge is still in use today for pedestrian and light traffic.[12]
Bailey truss
Baltimore truss
Bollman truss
7/23
The Bollman Truss Railroad Bridge at Savage,
Maryland, United States is the only surviving example
of a revolutionary design in the history of American
bridge engineering. The type was named for its
inventor, Wendel Bollman, a self-educated Baltimore
engineer. It was the first successful all-metal bridge
design (patented in 1852) to be adopted and
consistently used on a railroad. The design employs
wrought iron tension members and cast iron
compression members. The use of multiple
independent tension elements reduces the likelihood of
catastrophic failure. The structure was also easy to
assemble.
The Wells Creek Bollman Bridge is the only other Bollman truss in Savage, Maryland,
US. Built in 1869, moved to Savage
bridge designed by Wendel Bollman still in existence,
in 1887. It is still in use today as a
but it is a Warren truss configuration. pedestrian bridge.
39°8′5.42″N 76°49′30.33″W
Bowstring truss
Brown truss
Main article: Brown truss
In the Brown truss all vertical elements are under
tension, with exception of the end posts. This type of
truss is particularly suited for timber structures that
use iron rods as tension members. Brown truss
Brunel truss
See Lenticular truss below.
8/23
Burr arch truss
Cantilever truss
Fink truss
There are also inverted Fink truss bridges such as the Moody Pedestrian Bridge in
Austin, Texas.
Howe truss
9/23
The Howe truss, patented in 1840 by Massachusetts
millwright William Howe, includes vertical members
and diagonals that slope up towards the center, the Howe truss – the diagonals are
opposite of the Pratt truss.[15]
In contrast to the Pratt under compression under balanced
truss, the diagonal web members are in compression loading
and the vertical web members are in tension. Few of
these bridges remain standing. Examples include Jay Bridge in Jay, New York;
McConnell's Mill Covered Bridge in Slippery Rock Township, Lawrence County,
Pennsylvania; Sandy Creek Covered Bridge in Jefferson County, Missouri; and Westham
Island Bridge in Delta, British Columbia, Canada.
K-truss
I-895 K-truss
10/23
Kingpost truss
Main article: King post
One of the simplest truss styles to implement, the king
post consists of two angled supports leaning into a
common vertical support.
King post truss
Lenticular truss
A lenticular truss bridge includes a lens-shape truss,
with trusses between an upper chord (functioning as an
arch) that curves up and then down to end points, and
a lower chord (functioning as a suspension cable) that
curves down and then up to meet at the same end
points.[19] Where the arches extend above and below
the roadbed, it is called a lenticular pony truss
bridge. The Pauli truss bridge is a specific variant of
the lenticular truss, but the terms are not
interchangeable.[19]
11/23
compression forces are balanced these horizontal Massachusetts, built in 1883 by the
forces are not transferred to the supporting pylons (as Berlin Iron Bridge Co., is the
longest lenticular truss bridge in
is the case with most arch types). This in turn enables
the United States, with five spans,
the truss to be fabricated on the ground and then to be
as well as the second-oldest
raised by jacking as supporting masonry pylons are lenticular truss bridge in
constructed. This truss has been used in the Massachusetts.[18]
construction of a stadium,[20] with the upper chords of
parallel trusses supporting a roof that may be rolled
back. The Smithfield Street Bridge in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, is another example of this type.
Long truss
The Busching bridge, often erroneously used as an example of a Long truss, is an example
of a Howe truss, as the verticals are metal rods.[23]
12/23
Parker (camelback) truss
"Camelback bridge" redirects here. For the concrete bridge type, see concrete curved-
chord through girder bridge.
A Parker truss bridge is a Pratt truss design with a
polygonal upper chord. A "camelback" is a subset of the
Parker type, where the upper chord consists of exactly
five segments. An example of a Parker truss is the
Traffic Bridge in Saskatoon, Canada. An example of a
camelback truss is the Woolsey Bridge near Woolsey,
Arkansas.
Partridge truss
Pegram truss
The Pegram truss is a hybrid between the Warren
and Parker trusses where the upper chords are all of
equal length and the lower chords are longer than the
corresponding upper chord. Because of the difference
in upper and lower chord length, each panel is not Pegram truss
The Pegram truss consists of a Parker type design with the vertical posts leaning towards
the center at an angle between 60 and 75°. The variable post angle and constant chord
length allowed steel in existing bridges to be recycled into a new span using the Pegram
truss design. This design also facilitated reassembly and permitted a bridge to be adjusted
13/23
to fit different span lengths. There are twelve known remaining Pegram span bridges in
the United States with seven in Idaho, two in Kansas, and one each in California,
Washington, and Utah.
Post truss
Pratt truss
14/23
determinate bridges, which lend themselves well to
long spans. They were common in the United States
between 1844 and the early 20th century.[29]
Queenpost truss
Smith truss
15/23
Smith truss
Thacher truss
The Thacher truss [33] combines some of the
characteristics of a Pratt truss with diagonals under
tension and of a Howe truss with diagonals under
compression. It is quite rare.
A Thacher truss bridge
Truss arch
Vierendeel truss
Waddell truss
One example was the Waddell "A" Truss Bridge (Parkville, Missouri).
16/23
Waddell "A" truss (1898 bridge)
Warren truss
Main article: Warren truss
The Warren truss was patented in 1848 by James
Warren and Willoughby Theobald Monzani, and
consists of longitudinal members joined only by angled A Warren truss
cross-members, forming alternately inverted
equilateral triangle-shaped spaces along its length, ensuring that no individual strut,
beam, or tie is subject to bending or torsional straining forces, but only to tension or
compression. Loads on the diagonals alternate between compression and tension
(approaching the center), with no vertical elements, while elements near the center must
support both tension and compression in response to live loads. This configuration
combines strength with economy of materials and can therefore be relatively light. The
girders being of equal length, it is ideal for use in prefabricated modular bridges. It is an
improvement over the Neville truss which uses a spacing configuration of isosceles
triangles.
Whipple truss
17/23
Bridge L-158, a double-intersection
Whipple rail truss over the
Muscoot Reservoir in Golden's
Bridge, New York
Wichert truss
0:22
References
Footnotes
1. ^ Science and Industry Archived 2017-02-15 at the Wayback Machine, Members of
a Truss Bridge by Benj. F. La Rue, Home Study Magazine, Published by the Colliery
Engineer Company, Vol 3, No. 2, March 1898, pages 67-68.
2. ^ "Temporary Skagit River bridge may be open in weeks". King 5 television. May
26, 2013. Archived from the original on June 7, 2013. Retrieved March 27, 2013.
3. ^ Jump up to: a b Adams, Charles Kendall, ed. (1909). "Bridges". Universal
Cyclopædia and Atlas. New York: D. Appleton and Company. pp. 161–174.
Retrieved September 1, 2022.
18/23
4. ^ Kirsanov, M. (2019). Planar Trusses: Schemes and Formulas. GB: Cambridge
Scholars Publishing. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-5275-3531-2.
5. ^ "Timber Truss Bridges" (PDF). McMillan Britton & Kell Pty Limited. Roads and
Traffic Authority. December 1998. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 March
2011. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
6. ^ "Tharwa Bridge Conservation Management Plan" (PDF). Philip Leeson
Architects. Roads ACT. 5 March 2009. pp. 42, 45. Archived (PDF) from the original
on 21 February 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
7. ^ "1307.8 – Australian Capital Territory in Focus, 2007". Australian Bureau of
Statistics. 27 November 2007. Archived from the original on 14 October 2012.
Retrieved 23 November 2010.
8. ^ "Tharwa Bridge". Engineers Australia. Canberra's Engineering Heritage.
Archived from the original on 2011-02-19. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
9. ^ "July 2010 Newsletter | Engineers Australia". www.engineersaustralia.org.au.
Archived from the original on 2021-10-01. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
10. ^ "Minutes of State Heritage Register Committee meeting" (PDF). State Heritage
Register Committee. Heritage Council of New South Wales. 5 November 2008. p. 5.
Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
11. ^ "Hampden Bridge, Wagga Wagga, NSW". Timber Building in Australia.
Archived from the original on 2013-05-12. Retrieved 2008-06-05.
12. ^ Google-maps "-34.180255,150.610654" clearly shows bridge with traffic
13. ^ U.S. Patent 2,064
14. ^ Gardner, Denis P. (2008). Wood, Concrete, Stone, Steel: Minnesota's Historic
Bridges. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-8166-
4666-1.
15. ^ Jump up to: a b Matsuo Bridge Company, Bridge Types – Truss Archived 2006-
09-05 at the Wayback Machine, accessed September 2007
16. ^ Panoramio- Reviewed 2020-03-23
17. ^ Historic Context for Louisiana Bridges Archived 2020-12-24 at the Wayback
Machine- Retrieved 2020-03-23 (section 3, pp 71)
18. ^ "Aiken Street Bridge: Ouellette Bridge". HistoricBridges.org. 2018. Archived
from the original on 9 July 2018. Retrieved 9 July 2018.
19. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Boothby, Thomas (2020). "Designing American Lenticular
Truss Bridges 1878–1900". History Cooperative. Archived from the original on 5
November 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
20. ^ "Arizona Cardinals Stadium". Archived from the original on 2007-11-03.
Retrieved 2008-04-28.
21. ^
22. ^ Eldean Covered Bridge – Troy, Ohio – Covered Bridges on Archived 2012-10-18 at
the Wayback Machine. Waymarking.com. Retrieved on 2013-07-23.
23. ^ "Busching Bridge". CLR Inc. Construction and Transportation. Archived from
the original on August 20, 2011. Retrieved June 25, 2012.
24. ^ Kennedy, Willella Shearer. "Heritage: Being Little Stories of Union County".
Union County Historical Society, Printed by The Marysville Journal Tribune. 1963.
Pg. 48.
19/23
25. ^ US 314262, Pegram, George H., "Truss for Roofs and Bridges", published 10-24-
1881, issued 03-24-1885
26. ^ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Archived 2013-01-15 at the
Wayback Machine for Healdsburg Memorial Bridge, California State Park System,
accessed 2011-12-26.
27. ^ Jackson, Donald C. (1995). Great American Bridges and Dams. New York: John
Wiley & Sons. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-471-14385-7.
28. ^ Jump up to: a b c Maryland Historical Trust Property Number PG-74B-1 & AA-
85I (PDF), Maryland Inventory of Historic Bridges, archived (PDF) from the
original on 26 December 2013, retrieved 5 January 2013
29. ^ Covered Bridge's Truss Types Archived 2006-09-04 at the Wayback Machine
30. ^ "R.W. Smith Truss Patent 66,900". United States Patent Office. United States of
America. July 16, 1867. Archived from the original on 11 November 2018.
Retrieved 10 November 2018.
31. ^ Lorrie K. Owen, ed. (1999). Ohio Historic Places Dictionary, Volume 2. Somerset
Publishers, Inc. p. 794. ISBN 9781878592705. Archived from the original on 2020-
06-14. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
32. ^ Steinman, D. B. (1932). The Wichert Truss. New York: D. Van Nostrand
Company, Inc. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
33. ^ "The Wichert Truss". Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960,
Historic Context Report (PDF). Maryland Department of Transportation State
Highway Administration. 1995. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
34. ^ "E. M. Wichert Services Set For Tomorrow". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. March 23,
1955. Retrieved August 29, 2022 – via Newspapers.com.
35. ^ "Charles Anderson Memorial Bridge". Bridges & Tunnels of Allegheny County &
Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
36. ^ Wilson, Helen; Wilson, Todd (November 2017). "From Browns to Grays:
Evolution of the Homestead Grays Bridge" (PDF). Historic Bridge Bulletin. 4 (3):
5–9. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
External links
20/23
Matsuo Bridge Company: Bridge Types – Truss
Management Plan for Historic Bridges in Virginia: The 2017 Update—Virginia
Department of Transportation's plan for managing its historic bridges, including
metal truss bridges. The update includes sections on study findings such as "General
Issues Regarding Metal and Metal Truss Bridges (Including Potential Life Span),"
"Coatings Issues for Metal Truss Bridges: Painting, Metallizing, and Galvanizing,"
and "Truss Bridge Capacity and Overloading Potential."
structurae.de The Structurae database on bridges.
Bridge-related articles
21/23
Structural types Arch
Beam
Box girder
Bridge–tunnel
Burr Truss
Cable-stayed
Canopy
Cantilever
Cantilever spar cable-stayed
Covered
Crib
Double-beam drawbridge
Extradosed
Jet
Log
Moon
Moveable
Bascule
Drawbridge
Folding
Retractable
Rolling
Rolling bascule
Submersible
Swing
Table
Tilt
Transporter
Vertical-lift
Multi-way
Navigable aqueduct
Pile
Pontoon
Vlotbrug
Suspension
types
Timber
Through arch
Trestle
Truss
Tubular
Viaduct
Visual index to various types
22/23
Lists of bridges by List of bridges
type bascule bridges
cantilever bridges
medieval stone bridges in
Germany
multi-level bridges
road–rail bridges
toll bridges
vertical-lift bridges
List of bridge–tunnels
List of lists of covered bridges
Category
23/23