Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 93 views

    IA To Condone Refiling Delay

    Uploaded by

    Ravindra Nath Pareek
    [1] Manoj Kumar Shrivastava has filed a special leave petition against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court from March 2022. [2] The Supreme Court registry found defects in the filing and requested original records and verification of facts. [3] The petitioner did not have the original records and had to retrieve them from their advocate, resulting in a delay in re-filing. The petitioner is seeking condonation of the delay, arguing it was bona fide and unintentional.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    IA To Condone Refiling Delay

    Uploaded by

    Ravindra Nath Pareek
    93 views2 pages
    [1] Manoj Kumar Shrivastava has filed a special leave petition against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court from March 2022. [2] The Supreme Court registry found defects in the filing and requested original records and verification of facts. [3] The petitioner did not have the original records and had to retrieve them from their advocate, resulting in a delay in re-filing. The petitioner is seeking condonation of the delay, arguing it was bona fide and unintentional.

    Original Description:

    Its an application seeking condonation of delay in refiling after curing the defects.

    Original Title

    IA to condone Refiling Delay

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    [1] Manoj Kumar Shrivastava has filed a special leave petition against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court from March 2022. [2] The Supreme Court registry found defects in the filing and requested original records and verification of facts. [3] The petitioner did not have the original records and had to retrieve them from their advocate, resulting in a delay in re-filing. The petitioner is seeking condonation of the delay, arguing it was bona fide and unintentional.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    93 views2 pages

    IA To Condone Refiling Delay

    Uploaded by

    Ravindra Nath Pareek
    [1] Manoj Kumar Shrivastava has filed a special leave petition against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court from March 2022. [2] The Supreme Court registry found defects in the filing and requested original records and verification of facts. [3] The petitioner did not have the original records and had to retrieve them from their advocate, resulting in a delay in re-filing. The petitioner is seeking condonation of the delay, arguing it was bona fide and unintentional.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction


    Crl.M.A. No. ________/2023
    IN
    Transfer Petition (Crl) No. ______/2023

    IN THE MATTER OF :

    MANOJ KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA ……..PETITIONER


    Versus
    STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS …….RESPONDENTS

    Application for condonation on delay in Re-Filling of


    Special Leave Petition

    To,
    The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
    and His Companion Justice of
    Supreme Court of India
    The Humber Petition on behalf of
    the petitioner above named:
    MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

    1. That the petitioner has filed a Special Leave Petition


    arising out of the Impugned Judgment and final order
    dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
    Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P.
    No. 14162/2019 (D.B.).

    2. That after scrutiny of the paper books of the e-filling,


    of defects were pointed out by the registry.
    3. That the petitioners were asked to get the original
    record of the case for filing documents and for verifying
    some facts stated in the special leave petition.
    4. That petitioners did not have the original record and
    had to go the High Court advocate for collecting the
    original record.
    5. That the defects were cured immediately after the
    petitioners arrived at the advocate office.
    6. That the petitioners could not get the record in time
    and delay occurred. The delay is bonafide and
    unintentional.
    7. That the delay may be condoned in the interest of
    justice.
    Prayer:-
    It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
    Court may be graciously pleased to:-
    (a) Condone the delay of………days in Re-filling the
    Special leave petition filed against the Impugned
    Judgment and final order dated 22.03.2022
    passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya
    Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P. No.
    14162/2019 (D.B.).
    (b) Pass such other and further order or orders as
    this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in
    the facts and circumstance of the present case.

    DRAWN ON – 28.11.2022 Filed By;


    Filed on : .11.2022
    Place : New Delhi PRAVEEN SWARUP
    Advocate for the petitioner

    You might also like