Guidelines For Reading and Analysing Literature
Guidelines For Reading and Analysing Literature
Guidelines For Reading and Analysing Literature
Do you have any prior knowledge of the author or this work or similar works?
Have introductory notes in textbooks or instructors' comments or study questions influenced your initial
expectations?
(Note: In many editions of fiction or drama, if there is a long introduction, it may "give away" the
outcome of the plot, so it is best not to read the complete introduction until you have read the work for the
first time and are ready to analyze it as a whole.)
What motivates you to read through to the end, or reread it (besides the fact that it may be required for a
class)?
Do the title, division headings, and opening lines give precise indications of the purpose or subtle or
symbolic clues, or misleading impressions of the whole work?
Try to begin reading with an open mind and attempt to understand the work on its own terms before
judging its worth or quality.
If so, why?
Do foreign words or archaic (outdated) words or unusual sentence patterns make reading difficult?
Does the work violate our expectations about ordinary ways of using the English language?
Later decide whether it is "easy" or difficult to read for a good reason: does the simplicity or difficulty of
the language contribute to the author's message or does it seem either boring or unnecessarily obscure and
complex?
5. Do your first impressions change between your reading of the beginning and end?
If so, why?
In the following steps, start to think more formally about why you have certain expectations about this
type of literature and how this work uses literary techniques to create the impressions or effects or
messages you have noticed in reading it.
Although critics disagree on how to define and label different genres, the three basic forms of literature
are prose, drama, and poetry. Most works we read as literature are imaginative (fictional), but some
nonimaginative (nonfictional) works are read as literature as well.
Nonfiction prose includes history, biography, autobiography, religious and philosophical writing, literary
criticism, political tracts, travel literature, and essays on many other subjects.
Prose fiction has been divided, since the origins of the modern novel in the eighteenth century, into
the novel, the novella or novelette (a story of intermediate length), and the short story. Predecessors of
these genres include fables, parables, and tales of various kinds (including folk tales, fabliaux, and fairy
tales).
Drama may be written in prose or poetry. Most drama is meant to be performed, but closet drama is
designed to be read rather than acted. When we read a play we should take into consideration the
differences between watching a performance and reading the script, with the background and stage
directions that are provided by some playwrights.
Poetry may be narrative (telling a story, as in a ballad or a long epic poem) or lyrical (shorter subjective
or reflective poems that include specific types such as the sonnet, the ode, and the elegy).
Film, which combines techniques of drama, poetry, visual arts, and music, has been included in literary
studies since the twentieth century, with movie scripts being studied as works of art alongside the books
and plays many films are based on. Undoubtedly modern technology will continue to influence the forms
and genres of literature, through trends in film and television, and the increasing use of computers for
processing information, writing, and reading.
Picture books sometimes have no words, but usually they use words and pictures together to tell a story,
present a poem, or explore concepts (as in alphabet books, counting books, and other concept books).
Modern technology has made possible the publication of mass market full-color reproductions of all kinds
of art in picture books for readers of all ages.
These broad genres are classified in many different ways, according to their form and content, into
"modes" or "kinds" or "subgenres." Traditional categories such as tragedy, comedy, realism,
and romance, for example, have been defined in different ways at different times.
Some subcategories of fiction, drama and film include romantic comedy, satire, mystery, horror, fantasy,
science fiction, magical realism, bildungsroman (stories of initiation into adult life), psychological novels
or plays, domestic romance or tragedy, historical fiction or drama. Nonfiction novel is a contemporary
term used by some for works that combine elements of journalistic reporting or documentary and the
devices of fiction. Although these labels help us discuss trends and make comparisons among different
authors, many works of literature cannot be placed into one neat category.
The greatest writers in any period often combine traditional types, break the "rules" or conventions of
older literary genres, and experiment with new forms.
The following is a list of some of the major elements and techniques of literature. Obviously, no one work
of literature contains all of them (e.g., only a narrative has a plot). Decide which elements are used and
which are given the most emphasis (and why) in the particular work you are analyzing.
1. Plot
What are the actions or events of the narrative and how are they presented? Are there major and
minor events in the story? How are they related?
How does the passage of time function in the plot? Are the episodes in chronological order? If
not, why not?
Are any later incidents foreshadowed early in the story? Are flashbacks used to fill in past events?
If so, why?
What elements create suspense in the plot? Where is the climax (most intense action or point of
highest emotional interest)?
Does the plot depend on chance or coincidence, or does it grow out of the personalities of the
characters? Do events seem realistic or unrealistic (romantic or fantastic)?
What conflicts are dramatized? Are they internal conflicts (within the minds of people)
or external conflicts (between individuals or between people and the world)?
Are conflicts resolved at the end of the story? Is there a surprise ending? Is the ending satisfying
to you as the reader?
2. Character
Are the characters believable (round and complex, like real people) or are they flat stereotypes?
(Remember that literary characters are always fictional creations; they can never be as complex as
real people.)
Is there one protagonist (main character) or several? Does the story have traditional heroes or
heroines (protagonists) and villains (antagonists)?
How does the author reveal characters–through direct description and authorial comment, through
the comments and thoughts of other characters, or through the characters' own actions, words, and
thoughts?
What are the most important traits of the main characters? How do their judgments of themselves
compare with others' opinions of them? What is the author's attitude to characters? Are we meant
to sympathize with the characters or criticize them?
How do the secondary and minor characters function in the work? Do they provide parallels or
contrasts with traits of the main characters?
Do the main characters develop (change or learn something) in the story, or do they
remain static (unchanging)? How? Why?
3. Setting
What is the setting of the work? Is there more than one? (Consider historical period, season, time
of day, geographical place, exterior and interior, urban and rural settings.)
Why has the author chosen to emphasize certain details of the setting? Does the setting simply
provide a realistic backdrop or does it contain symbolic details?
Are the social class and occupation of the characters significant? Does the social, economic,
political, or religious environment affect the lives of characters and help to shape the theme of the
work?
What mood or atmosphere is created by details of the setting? (gloomy, tense, cheerful, etc.)?
4. Point of View
From what point of view is the story or poem narrated? Does the narrator speak in first
person (using "I") or in third person?
(a) If there is a first-person narrator, is that person a major character or a minor character observing the
main action? What are the limitations on what this person can show and tell us? Is this narrator
a reliable one, or is he or she too naive, self-deluded, or deceptive to be reliable?
(b) If the narration is in third person, is the narrator omniscient (able to see anything and tell us what is in
the characters' minds), or is there limited omniscience so that we see into the mind of only one character?
(c) Is the point of view objective (dramatic), so that we see characters only from the outside but do not see
into their minds? This is the point of view in drama but it is rare in fiction. In a play characters' thoughts
are revealed only if they think out loud or speak directly to the audience or confide in another character.
What is the prevailing tone of the work? That is, what attitudes toward the subject are conveyed
by the narrator's choice of words? Is the subject presented in a manner that is serious, satirical,
playful, condescending, etc.?
Does the point of view change in this work?
Notice how your perceptions are affected if the narrator shifts the point of view from the actions
or thoughts of one character to those of another.
What images (any details that appeal to the physical senses) are used in this work?
Are the images literal (e.g., a description of a real rose), or figurative (as in, e.g., the simile, "My
love is like a rose," and the metaphor, "My love is a rose")?
Are there repeated images, or groups of related images in the work (e.g., various kinds of light
and dark images)? If so, what is the significance of these patterns?
Does any image or action suggest such complex abstract meanings beyond itself that it functions
as a symbol in this work?
Are the symbols conventional, familiar ones (e.g., a rose symbolizing love, a cross representing
Christianity), or unusual, private symbols? (The white whale in Moby Dick, e.g., has many
possible symbolic meanings suggested by Melville.)
6. Style and Language
How would you describe the choice of words and their arrangement (the style) in this work? Does
the author call attention to the way he or she uses words, or is the style inconspicuous?
What are the various connotations (shades of meaning, or emotional suggestions) of key words in
this work?
If dialect or colloquial speech is used, what is its effect? Is the level of language appropriate for
the speaker or characters in the work?
Are there statements or actions in this work that are presented ironically (that is, there is a
discrepancy between appearance and reality, or between what is said and what is intended)?
Is the style consistent throughout the work or does it shift to a different style (more formal or less
formal, for example)?
Is the style suitable for the subject and theme of the work? Does it contribute to the meaning of
the whole or hinder the reader's understanding?
If you are reading a translation of a foreign work of literature or a modern translation of an older
English work, what limitations or difficulties are created by your lack of contact with the author's
original language?
STEP IV:
Theme may be thought of as the central ideas, values, thesis, message, or meaning presented in a work of
literature. The theme reveals the connection between the literary work (the world created by the author's
imagination) and the outside world. Thus literature can be both fictional and "true" when it expresses real
human emotions or makes valid comments on human experience, even if on the surface the characters,
plots, and settings are not realistic ones.
Analyzing theme always involves generalizations and abstractions. There are universal themes that can be
found in countless works of literature, such as love and hate, good and evil, innocence and experience,
communication and isolation, life and death, society and the individual. A story or poem may be about a
specific love affair, for example; it is easy to say the general subject is love, but interpreting the theme
involves explaining what the work says about love.
Great, complex works of literature have more than one theme and we can never pin down their meanings
with absolute certainty. Some works are deliberately vague or ambiguous (suggesting more than one
alternate meaning). Our interpretations of theme must always be supported by evidence from the text.
Themes may be revealed in a number of ways:
Most imaginative literature presents theme indirectly and dramatically, although in some works
the theme is quite obvious and in others it is more difficult to detect.
A. Personal Reactions
1. Has your reading of this work been enhanced in any way by your personal experience, other
readings and studies, or plays and movies you have seen? (What have you learned from this work
that could enhance your own life and work?)
2. Have you made notes (including underlining and marking in your own text) to help you
remember and review important features of this work?
3. Are you judging the work solely on its own merits, unswayed by personal judgments about the
author's life and reputation or private prejudices about the content of the work (including
prejudices against required reading or long, difficult works)?
4. Do you agree or disagree with evaluations made by other readers of this work (students,
professors, critics)?
5. Do you agree or disagree with the ideas or values presented in the work? Why?
6. Has your enjoyment and appreciation of the work increased or decreased after analyzing it
carefully on your own or in class?
7. If you were writing a review of this work for a newspaper, what would you say to encourage
others to read it or not read it?
B. Author's Accomplishment
1. Do the imaginative world and ideas of the work seem vivid and alive? Does it present a mature
and meaningful vision of reality that deserves serious reflection?
2. Is the language of the work appealing? Are the form and content consistent with each other?
What are the strengths and weaknesses in the literary techniques used?
3. Has the reputation of this work and its author changed since it was written? Does knowledge of
the author's life enhance your understanding of the work? (Avoid simplistic assumptions about
the connections between authors' personal lives and characters or events in their writings.)
4. How does this work compare to other works by the same author, and to works by other
authors? (This is especially important in a survey course.)
5. How is this work representative of literary trends of its nation and period? Does it reflect
concerns related to the history, sociology, religion, etc. of its period? Does learning more about
the history and culture of the work's origin enhance your understanding of the literature or does
the work have a universal message that is clear to any reader?
Great works of literature should both enrich your appreciation of the past (the times in which they were
written) and give you new insights into common human experiences regardless of time or place.
Source: http://www2.ferrum.edu/thanlon/studyq/litguide.htm