Net Zero Cloud Business Guide To Carbon Accounting
Net Zero Cloud Business Guide To Carbon Accounting
Net Zero Cloud Business Guide To Carbon Accounting
CARBON
ACCOUNTING
A guide to understanding carbon accounting,
your organization’s environmental footprint,
and how you can get started.
OVERVIEW
Carbon accounting is a critical step in measuring your climate impact and addressing it. In this
guide, you’ll gain a strong understanding of what carbon accounting is and how to account for
carbon emissions throughout your value chain. You’ll also learn how to analyze the results and
use these insights to inform your climate action priorities.
Carbon accounting is the foundation for implementing meaningful climate action in your
organization. Once you take inventory of your GHG emissions, you can start to make carbon
reduction plans that support your sustainability strategy.
Greenhouse gases trap heat, which sustains life on Earth by allowing the sun to warm the planet
and prevent the warmth from escaping into space. However, an increase in GHG emissions, largely
caused by human activity, is disrupting the atmospheric balance that maintains our climate,
resulting in extreme global effects on ecosystems, economies, and communities. These negative
impacts include extreme heat, major wildfires, megastorms, and rapidly rising sea levels.
The world uses the common unit CO2e, or carbon dioxide equivalent, to simplify discussion around
GHG emissions. The EPA defines CO2e as the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the
same global warming potential as one metric ton of another GHG. In other words, CO2e refers to
the impact from all GHGs, normalized and described in terms of CO2 impact. By referring to the
impact of all GHGs in terms of CO2e, we can make direct comparisons among various GHGs.
SCOPE 1
Direct emissions from activities of the company, such as fuel combustion from onsite gas-fired
boilers or diesel generators, and emissions produced by company-owned vehicles.
SCOPE 2
Emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat, or cooling
consumed by the reporting company but generated elsewhere, such as a power plant.
Electricity Steam
Heating Cooling
SCOPE 3
Indirect emissions from all other sources in the company’s supply chain, including employee
commuting, business travel, purchased goods and services, raw materials, and distribution.
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
The impact from powering your company’s owned facilities and vehicles makes up your
scope 1 and 2 emissions. A representative from this department can connect you with the
data needed to calculate these and can also help analyze the data to identify the biggest
opportunities to reduce the emissions in your direct control.
FINANCE
Emissions reductions almost always have a cost impact. Sometimes reducing emissions costs
money, and sometimes it can actually result in a financial benefit. It’s important to establish a
strong relationship with your finance team to forecast these impacts as you hone your strategy.
Accounting
Carbon emissions accounting is very similar to financial accounting, both in the skills
and effort required to get the job done and in the third-party audits and quality
required (or soon to be required) by governmental regulations.
Travel
Business travel can account for a significant portion of a company’s scope 3
emissions. You’ll want to include whomever is responsible for managing corporate
travel software, approving employee travel, and coordinating travel for executives
in the conversation. They will play an important role in data collection, as well as in
identifying and implementing travel-related GHG reduction strategies.
IT/INFRASTRUCTURE
If a company owns, operates, or utilizes data centers, the infrastructure team will play an
integral role in carbon emissions accounting and reduction. The IT team can also provide
helpful support in implementing and managing GHG tracking software.
LEGAL
The data that gets reported and disclosed should be reviewed by members of your legal team.
They can also help put emission requirements into supplier contracts (see the sustainability
exhibit for more on how to do that). And they can review third-party agreements related to
emission reduction projects, renewable energy deals, and carbon credit purchases.
PROCUREMENT
Indirect (scope 3) emissions usually account for the vast majority of a company’s GHG
footprint, with a large portion coming from upstream, or supply chain, emissions. Therefore, it’s
critical to establish strong relationships with your procurement team to identify the best ways
to engage with your suppliers on this issue. The deep emissions reductions that will be required
in scope 3 will only be possible by working together on both data collection and data reduction
activities throughout the value chain.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
For companies that manufacture products, the design, use, and end-of-life treatment of these
products determine their environmental impact. The product design and/or engineering team
should be engaged to ensure accurate data collection and to ensure that insights from the
footprinting process are fed directly back into the design process to maximize reductions.
The first step in calculating your GHG footprint is identifying what the boundary of your
calculation will include. Companies often align with the methodology outlined by the
Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which explains how companies should identify which assets to include
for scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and how to categorize and frame their scope 3 emissions.
For scope 3 emissions, you should capture emissions data for all your direct, or Tier 1,
suppliers. We refer to these as upstream emissions. If you produce a finished product or a
service that gets sold to a customer with no further chain, you should collect emissions from
distribution channels and resellers, also known as downstream emissions. If you produce
intermediary goods that go through further processing (for example, raw copper, which gets
produced into copper sheets, which get produced into copper wire), then you want to track
emissions until your product becomes a final product. If all companies do this, that reduces the
amount of upstream tracking required.
This explanation ties most closely to manufacturing, but the same principle of tracking one
step upstream and all steps downstream can be applied to other industries as well. Regardless
of the industry, companies must define and disclose their reporting boundaries, which may
include the GHGs themselves, their sources, the reporting period, the geography, or the
business structure or unit.
Once you’ve established your boundaries, you can begin data collection. But collecting the
activity data that serves as the foundation for a GHG footprint is not simple. For scope 1 data,
you’ll need to find information on natural gas and diesel used onsite, as well as fuel logs for
owned vehicles. Scope 2 data largely consists of electricity and natural gas bills, but finding
these can be challenging, especially for smaller offices. Sometimes companies end up needing
to fill in the gaps when certain data records simply aren’t available by estimating impact using
headcount or square footage.
Scope 3 data is by far the most complex. Many companies collect as much actual data as
possible — travel data, for example — and then rely on estimates to fill in the gaps where source
data is especially challenging to capture. In the end, it’s most important to do the best you
can with what you have and to commit to continued efforts to improve data quality and data
consistency over time.
The raw data you gather will not come to you as carbon emissions data. Data for a flight, for
instance, might include the price, distance traveled, ticket class, and aircraft type. Turning that
data into metric tons of CO2e requires a series of calculations and conversions. In some cases,
there are a few ways to complete these calculations, and it’s important to carefully consider
which emissions factors and methodologies will provide the most accurate, complete picture
of your GHG emissions.
For electricity data, two different methodologies are recommended: the location-based
method and the market-based method. Location-based emissions communicate the carbon
impact of electricity based on the local electric grid that each building is physically connected
to. The market-based method allows companies to account for renewable energy purchases
they have made (for example, through a power purchase agreement), meaning that their
total emissions will be lower. Because these two methods each tell an important part of a
company’s GHG impact story, the GHG protocol recommends that companies calculate their
emissions using both of these methods and share both side by side in GHG footprint reports.
Internal reviews are a critical step in the GHG inventory process. The intent of these internal
reviews is to ensure that the data and methodology match the on-the-ground realities for the
business and that the datasets are complete.
Next, it’s best practice to engage an independent third party to complete a full review or even
an audit of the GHG inventory to verify its accuracy. In spirit, this is very similar to a third-party
audit of the financial records and claims of a publicly traded company. Reviews are sufficient
for now, but full audits will eventually be among the requirements.
But there is an easier, faster, more accurate way to account for your company’s carbon
emissions. Net Zero Cloud pulls your emissions data in automatically, so you get an accurate,
timely view of all areas that contribute to your carbon footprint. It’s a complete sustainability
management platform that comes with analytics dashboards that help users make sense of
their organization’s carbon inventory. These dashboards are powered by Tableau and help
users drill deep into their organization’s energy usage patterns and carbon emissions intensities
to find areas on which to focus carbon reduction efforts.
The information provided in this report is strictly for the convenience of our customers and is for general informational purposes only.
Publication by salesforce.com does not constitute an endorsement. Salesforce.com does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of
any information, text, graphics, links, or other items contained within this report. Salesforce.com does not guarantee you will achieve
any specific results if you follow any advice in the report. It may be advisable for you to consult with a professional such as a lawyer,
accountant, architect, business advisor, or professional engineer to get specific advice that applies to your specific situation.