07 Pump
07 Pump
07 Pump
Syllabus
Pumps and Pumping System: Types, Performance evaluation, Efficient system opera-tion,
Flow control strategies and energy conservation opportunities
Centrifugal Pumps
A centrifugal pump is of a very simple design. The two main parts of the pump are the impeller
and the diffuser. Impeller, which is the only moving part, is attached to a shaft and driven by a
motor. Impellers are generally made of bronze, polycarbonate, cast iron, stainless steel as well
as other materials. The diffuser (also called as volute)
houses the impeller and captures and directs the water
off the impeller.
Water enters the center (eye) of the impeller and exits
the impeller with the help of centrifugal force. As water
leaves the eye of the impeller a low-pressure area is cre-
ated, causing more water to flow into the eye.
Atmospheric pressure and centrifugal force cause this to
happen. Velocity is developed as the water flows through
the impeller spinning at high speed. The water velocity is
collected by the diffuser and converted to pressure by
specially designed passageways that direct the flow to
the discharge of the pump, or to the next impeller should
the pump have a multi-stage configuration.
The pressure (head) that a pump will develop is in Figure 6.1 Centrifugal pump
direct relationship to the impeller diameter, the number
of impellers, the size of impeller eye, and shaft speed. Capacity is determined by the exit width
of the impeller. The head and capacity are the main factors, which affect the horsepower size of
the motor to be used. The more the quantity of water to be pumped, the more energy is required
ChemKlub India PDEC-Pumps
A centrifugal pump is not positive acting; it will not pump the same volume always. The greater
the depth of the water, the lesser is the flow from the pump. Also, when it pumps againstincreasing
pressure, the less it will pump. For these reasons it is important to select a centrifu- gal pump that
is designed to do a particular job.
Since the pump is a dynamic device, it is convenient to consider the pressure in terms of
head i.e. meters of liquid column. The pump generates the same head of liquid whatever the
density of the liquid being pumped. The actual contours of the hydraulic passages of the impeller
and the casing are extremely important, in order to attain the highest efficiency possi- ble. The
standard convention for centrifugal pump is to draw the pump performance curves showing
Flow on the horizontal axis and Head generated on the vertical axis. Efficiency, Power& NPSH
Required (described later), are conventionally shown on the vertical axis, plotted against Flow,
as illustrated in Figure 6.2.
Given the significant amount of electricity attributed to pumping systems, even small
improvements in pumping efficiency could yield very significant savings of electricity. The
pump is among the most inefficient of the components that comprise a pumping system, includ-
ing the motor, transmission drive, piping and valves.
Hydraulic power, pump shaft power and electrical input power
Hydraulic power Ph = Q (m3/s) x Total head, hd - hs (m) x (kg/m3) x g (m/s2) / 1000
Where hd – discharge head, hs – suction head, – density of the fluid, g – acceleration due to gravity
Pump shaft power Ps = Hydraulic power, Ph / pump efficiency, Pump
Electrical input power = Pump shaft power Ps
Motor
Figure 6.3 Static Head Figure 6.4 Static Head vs. Flow
Friction head (sometimes called dynamic head loss) is the friction loss, on the liquid being
moved, in pipes, valves and equipment in the system. Friction tables are universally available for
various pipe fittings and valves. These tables show friction loss per 100 feet (or metres) of a spe-
cific pipe size at various flow rates. In case of fittings, friction is stated as an equivalent length
of pipe of the same size. The friction losses are proportional to the square of the flow rate. A
closed loop circulating system without a surface open to atmospheric pressure, would exhibit
only friction losses and would have a system friction head loss vs. flow curve as Figure 6.5.
Figure 6.6 System with High Static Head Figure 6.7 System with Low Static Head
Static head is a characteristic of the specific installation and reducing this head where this
is possible, generally helps both the cost of the installation and the cost of pumping the liquid.
Friction head losses must be minimised to reduce pumping cost, but after eliminating unneces-
sary pipe fittings and length, further reduction in friction head will require larger diameter pipe,
which adds to installation cost.
If the actual system curve is different in reality to that calculated, the pump will operate at
a flow and head different to that expected.
For a centrifugal pump, an increasing system resistance will reduce the flow, eventually to
zero, but the maximum head is limited as shown. Even so, this condition is only acceptable for
a short period without causing problems. An error in the system curve calculation is also likely
to lead to a centrifugal pump selection, which is less than optimal for the actual system head loss-
es. Adding safety margins to the calculated system curve to ensure that a sufficiently large pump
is selected will generally result in installing an oversized pump, which will operate at an exces-
sive flow rate or in a throttled condition, which increases energy usage and reduces pump life.
In the system under consideration, water has to be first lifted to a height – this represents the
static head.
Then, we make a system curve, considering the friction and pressure drops in the system-
this is shown as the green curve.
Suppose, we have estimated our operating conditions as 500 m3/hr flow and 50 m head, we
will chose a pump curve which intersects the system curve (Point A) at the pump's best effi-
ciency point (BEP).
But, in actual operation, we find that 300 m3/hr is sufficient. The reduction in flow rate has
to be effected by a throttle valve. In other words, we are introducing an artificial resistance in
the system.
Due to this additional resistance, the frictional part of the system curve increases and thus
the new system curve will shift to the left -this is shown as the red curve.
So the pump has to overcome additional pressure in order to deliver the reduced flow. Now,
the new system curve will intersect the pump curve at point B. The revised parameters are
300 m3/hr at 70 m head. The red double arrow line shows the additional pressure drop due to
throttling.
You may note that the best efficiency point has shifted from 82% to 77% efficiency.
So what we want is to actually operate at point C which is 300 m3/hr on the original system
curve. The head required at this point is only 42 meters.
What we now need is a new pump which will operate with its best efficiency point at C. But
there are other simpler options rather than replacing the pump. The speed of the pump can be
reduced or the existing impeller can be trimmed (or new lower size impeller). The blue pump
curve represents either of these options.
Where:
Q = Flow rate
H = Head
P = Power absorbed
N = Rotating speed
Efficiency is essentially independent of speed
Q1 / Q2 = N1 / N2
Example: 100 / Q2 = 1750/3500
Q2 = 200 m3/hr
As can be seen from the above laws, doubling the speed of the centrifugal pump will increase
the power consumption by 8 times. Conversely a small reduction in speed will result in drastic
reduction in power consumption. This forms the basis for energy conservation in cen-trifugal
pumps with varying flow requirements. The implication of this can be better understood as shown
in an example of a centrifugal pump in Figure 6.13 below.
Points of equal efficiency on the curves for the 3 different speeds are joined to make the iso-
efficiency lines, showing that efficiency remains constant over small changes of speed provid-
ing the pump continues to operate at the same position related to its best efficiency point (BEP).
The affinity laws give a good approximation of how pump performance curves change with
speed but in order to obtain the actual performance of the pump in a system, the system curve
also has to be taken into account.
Efficiency varies when the diameter is changed within a particular casing. Note the difference
in iso-efficiency lines in Figure 6.14 compared with Figure 6.13. The relationships shown here
apply to the case for changing only the diameter of an impeller within a fixed casing geometry,
which is a common practice for making small permanent adjustments to the performance of a cen-
trifugal pump. Diameter changes are generally limited to reducing the diameter to about 75% of
the maximum, i.e. a head reduction to about 50%. Beyond this, efficiency and NPSH are badly
affected. However speed change can be used over a wider range without seriously reducing effi-
ciency. For example reducing the speed by 50% typically results in a reduction of efficiency by 1
or 2 percentage points. The reason for the small loss of efficiency with the lower speed is that
The illustrated curves are typical of most centrifugal pump types. Certain high flow, low
head pumps have performance curve shapes somewhat different and have a reduced operating
region of flows. This requires additional care in matching the pump to the system, when chang-
ing speed and diameter.
Pump suction performance (NPSH)
Liquid entering the impeller eye turns and is split into separate streams by the leading edges of the
impeller vanes, an action which locally drops the pressure below that in the inlet pipe to the pump.
If the incoming liquid is at a pressure with insufficient margin above its vapour pressure,
then vapour cavities or bubbles appear along the impeller vanes just behind the inlet edges. This
phenomenon is known as cavitation and has three undesirable effects:
1) The collapsing cavitation bubbles can erode the vane surface, especially when pumping
water-based liquids.
2) Noise and vibration are increased, with possible shortened seal and bearing life.
3) The cavity areas will initially partially choke the impeller passages and reduce the pump per-
formance. In extreme cases, total loss of pump developed head occurs.
The value, by which the pressure in the pump suction exceeds the liquid vapour pressure, is expressed
as a head of liquid and referred to as Net Positive Suction Head Available – (NPSHA). This is a charac-
teristic of the system design. The value of NPSH needed at the pump suction to prevent the pump from
cavitating is known as NPSH Required – (NPSHR). This is a characteristic of the pump design.
The three undesirable effects of cavitation described above begin at different values of
NPSHA and generally there will be cavitation erosion before there is a noticeable loss of pump
Figure 6.15 Example of the Effect of Pump Speed Change in a System With Only Friction Loss
Figure 6.16 Example for the Effect of Pump Speed Change with a System with High Static Head.
The drop in pump efficiency during speed reduction in a system with static head, reduces
the economic benefits of variable speed control. There may still be overall benefits but eco-
nomics should be examined on a case-by-case basis. Usually it is advantageous to select the
pump such that the system curve intersects the full speed pump curve to the right of best effi-
ciency, in order that the efficiency will first increase as the speed is reduced and then decrease.
This can extend the useful range of variable speed operation in a system with static head. The
pump manufacturer should be consulted on the safe operating range of the pump.
The system curve is usually not affected by the number of pumps that are running. For a
system with a combination of static and friction head loss, it can be seen, in Figure 6.18, that
Figure 6.18 Typical Head-Flow Curves for Pumps in Parallel, With System Curve Illustrated.
Stop/start control
In this control method, the flow is controlled by switching pumps on or off. It is necessary to
have a storage capacity in the system e.g. a wet well, an elevated tank or an accumulator type
pressure vessel. The storage can provide a steady flow to the system with an intermittent oper-
ating pump. When the pump runs, it does so at the chosen (presumably optimum) duty point and
when it is off, there is no energy consumption. If intermittent flow, stop/start operation and the
storage facility are acceptable, this is an effective approach to minimise energy consumption.
The stop/start operation causes additional loads on the power transmission components and
increased heating in the motor. The frequency of the stop/start cycle should be within the motor
design criteria and checked with the pump manufacturer.
It may also be used to benefit from "off peak" energy tariffs by arranging the run times dur-
ing the low tariff periods.
To minimise energy consumption with stop start control it is better to pump at as low flow
rate as the process permits. This minimises friction losses in the pipe and an appropriately small
pump can be installed. For example, pumping at half the flow rate for twice as long can reduce
energy consumption to a quarter.
Figure 6.19 Control of Pump Flow by Changing System Resistance Using a Valve.
To understand how the flow rate is controlled, see Figure 6.19. With the valve fully open,
the pump operates at "Flow 1". When the valve is partially closed it introduces an additional
friction loss in the system, which is proportional to flow squared. The new system curve cuts
the pump curve at "Flow 2", which is the new operating point. The head difference between the
two curves is the pressure drop across the valve.
It is usual practice with valve control to have the valve 10% shut even at maximum flow.
Energy is therefore wasted overcoming the resistance through the valve at all flow conditions.
There is some reduction in pump power absorbed at the lower flow rate (see Figure 6.19), but
the flow multiplied by the head drop across the valve, is wasted energy. It should also be noted
that, while the pump will accommodate changes in its operating point as far as it is able within
its performance range, it can be forced to operate high on the curve, where its efficiency is low,
and its reliability is affected.
Maintenance cost of control valves can be high, particularly on corrosive and solids-con-
taining liquids. Therefore, the lifetime cost could be unnecessarily high.
By-pass control
With this control approach, the pump runs continuously at the maximum process demand duty,
with a permanent by-pass line attached to the outlet. When a lower flow is required the surplus
liquid is bypassed and returned to the supply source.
An alternative configuration may have a tank supplying a varying process demand, which
is kept full by a fixed duty pump running at the peak flow rate. Most of the time the tank over-
Q = flow
H = head
BHP = brake horsepower of the pump motor
Subscript 1 = original pump,
Subscript 2 = pump after impeller trimming
D = Diameter
ChemKlub India PDEC-Pumps
Trimming an impeller changes its operating efficiency, and the non-linearities of the Affinity
Laws with respect to impeller machining complicate the prediction of pump perfor- mance.
Consequently, impeller diameters are rarely reduced below 70 percent of their original size.
REFERENCES
1. British Pump Manufacturers' Association
2. BEE (EMC) Inputs
3. PCRA Literature