CB1 CMP Upgrade 2022
CB1 CMP Upgrade 2022
CB1 CMP Upgrade 2022
Subject CB1
CMP Upgrade 2021/22
CMP Upgrade
This CMP Upgrade lists the changes to the Syllabus objectives, Core Reading and the ActEd
material since last year that might realistically affect your chance of success in the exam. It is
produced so that you can manually amend your 2021 CMP to make it suitable for study for the
2022 exams. It includes replacement pages and additional pages where appropriate.
Alternatively, you can buy a full set of up-to-date Course Notes / CMP at a significantly reduced
price if you have previously bought the full-price Course Notes / CMP in this subject. Please see
our 2022 Student Brochure for more details.
We only accept the current version of assignments for marking, ie those published for the
sessions leading to the 2022 exams. If you wish to submit your script for marking but have only
an old version, then you can order the current assignments free of charge if you have purchased
the same assignments in the same subject in a previous year, and have purchased marking for the
2022 session.
The balance between the Syllabus topics has been amended to:
1. Corporate governance and organisation (20%)
2. How corporates are financed (25%)
3. Evaluating projects (15%)
4. Constructing and interpreting company accounts (40%)
A new objective 2.2.4 has been added on offshore taxation which reads:
2.2.4 Explain why investment funds, including private equity funds, might locate offshore if they
obtain their funds from investors in a variety of jurisdictions.
Objective 2.3.2 now includes asset-backed securities in the bullet point list of financial
instruments.
Objective 2.5 has been revised to include divesting, with a new sub-objective 2.5.3 and now
reads:
2.5 Discuss how and why companies grow, how and why they may wish to divest and the
different ways of company restructuring.
2.5.1 Describe why businesses want to grow larger, how companies achieve internal
growth and explain the relationship between growth and profitability.
2.5.2 Describe the constraints on a firm’s growth.
2.5.3 Explain why a company may wish to divest subsidiaries or business units.
The following objectives (which were 5.1 and 5.2 in the 2021 syllabus) have been moved into
objective 4.2 and the previous sub-objectives under these headings have been removed:
4.2.7 Discuss the working capital position of a company.
4.2.11 Describe the function of forecasts and budgets as sources of management information.
At the end of several chapters, some Practice Questions have been amended to reduce the level
of bookwork testing. Only material changes to those questions and solutions are described here.
Study Guide
The Introduction to the Core Reading has been updated to include the following:
The United Kingdom left the European Union on 1 January 2021 without an EU-wide arrangement
for the operation and regulation of financial services. Discussions will continue during 2021 and
this version of the Core Reading does not attempt to address these areas.
At the time of writing of the Core Reading (early 2021), the enduring effect of the coronavirus
pandemic on both the global economy and financial markets will not be known for some time.
This version of the Core Reading does not attempt to address these areas.
The list of non-examinable Background references provided at the end of the Core Reading has
the following amendments and additions:
· FRC: The UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018:
https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/88bd8c45-50ea-4841-95b0-d2f4f48069a2/2018-
UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-FINAL.pdf
· A description of crowd funding and links to discussions of regulation:
https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/crowdfunding
· www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/the-code/download-code
· Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards. Available
at: https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainability-reporting/Pages/gri-
standards.aspx
Chapter 1
Practice Questions
Explain the problems that may arise in practice in demonstrating that companies do actually
operate in such a way as to maximise their shareholders’ wealth. [5]
Chapter 2
Section 1
This section is extended by a new Section 1.6 describing social enterprises. A replacement page
(10a) is attached.
Summary
Social enterprises have been added at the end of the Types of business entity section:
A social enterprise is a business with a clear social or environmental aim. Social enterprises are
defined by this, rather than the legal form of the business.
Practice Questions
Alice established an actuarial consultancy several years ago. The business has been successful.
Dhruv, one of the partnership’s longest-serving actuaries, has started to look for alternative
employment and Alice is considering offering him a partnership in the practice.
Chapter 3
Section 1.2
In the final sentence of this section, towards the top of page 6, the UK personal allowance figure
has been updated:
For example, in the UK, for the tax year 2021-22 the personal allowance is £12,570.
New Section
There is a new Section on Offshore investment funds. Replacement pages 14a and 14b are
attached.
Summary
The chapter summary has been updated to include this material. A replacement page is attached.
Chapter 4
Section 1
This section is extended by new Section 1.7 (Asset-backed securities) and Section 1.8 (Covered
bonds). Replacement pages (11-12b) are attached.
Section 2.1
Shareholders hold the equity interest or residual claim since they receive whatever assets
or earnings (ie profits after tax) are left over in the business after all its debts are paid.
Also on this page, an additional sentence has been added to the final paragraph of Core Reading,
which now reads:
Ordinary shares are the lowest ranking form of finance issued by companies. On a winding-
up they will rank after all creditors of the company. If a company makes losses (see below
for banks), it is the holders of equity capital who suffer first.
Section 2.1 has also been extended by a new final subsection on Bank share capital. A
replacement page is attached. You may find it most convenient to simply insert this immediately
before the chapter summary page.
Summary
The chapter summary has been updated to reflect these changes and a replacement summary
page is attached.
Chapter 5
Section 1
A new section of material on Private equity and private equity funds has been added at the end of
Section 1.3. A replacement page containing this material is attached (labelled Page A and Page B
for you to slip in at a convenient place in Chapter 5 of your notes).
Summary
The chapter summary has been updated to reflect these changes and a replacement summary
page is attached.
Chapter 6
Section 1
An additional sentence of Core Reading has been added at the bottom of page 4:
Leasing arrangements are widely used by operators of planes, ships, trains and car fleets.
The final sentence of Core Reading on page 5 has been amended slightly and a small amount of
material on lines of credit has been added on page 6. A replacement page 5/6 is attached.
Section 2.1
The final sentence of Core Reading has been replaced by:
There are no explicit arrangements for the repayment of overdrafts. However, a bank can
demand immediate repayment of an overdraft, with no prior notice.
Chapter 7
There is a new Section (3.1) on peer-to-peer lending. The chapter summary has been updated to
reflect this and there is also a new practice question. Replacement pages (9 onwards) reflect all
of these changes.
Chapter 8
Section 3.4
A new sentence of Core Reading has been added to the end of the Risk management subsection:
A bank might make extensive use of both interest rate swaps and currency swaps.
Chapter 9
Section 2.2
The final paragraph of Core Reading (which began ‘In the 1960s ….’) has been deleted.
Chapter 13
Section 1 is unchanged, Section 2 (Insurance companies) has been updated and there is a new
Section 3 (Banking company accounts). Replacement pages (13 onwards) reflect all of these
changes.
Chapter 14
Sections 1 to 5 have no material changes. Section 6 is unchanged except that at the end of the
introductory section (page 32) the sentence referring to ‘Chapter 16’ is deleted.
The 2021 Chapter 16 has been removed from the 2022 course. In the 2022 course, there is a new
section in Chapter 14, Section 7, which contains just the early material from the 2021 Chapter 16.
This new Section 7 is attached as replacement pages (which you should insert immediately before
the Chapter 14 Summary).
Chapter 15
Section 4.2
Section 4.2 contains some additional material on reporting on sustainability and carbon
emissions. Replacement page (11/12a) is attached.
Practice Questions
There is an additional practice question. A replacement page with the question is attached.
The solution is C.
Chapter 16
Please remove this chapter for 2022. The only material from here that remains in the course is
included in the new Chapter 14, Section 7 above.
Chapter 17
Section 2
In Section 2.2, the first two paragraphs are deleted as is the word ‘Finally’ at the start of the 3rd
paragraph.
So, the ‘Feedback’ section should be read as continuing the material about budgets, and begins:
Performance will be measured against budgets. Differences between actual and budget are
called variances and variances can be classified as ‘adverse’ or ‘favourable’.
Chapter 18
New Section 5
A replacement page (10A/B) with this new section is attached. The chapter then continues with
the existing ‘Section 5’ (which becomes Section 6 as a result) on page 11.
Summary
The chapter summary has been updated to reflect these changes and a replacement summary
page is attached.
Chapter 19
Section 2.3
On page 17, in the second paragraph under ‘Freak event’ delete the final sentence (starting
‘Global warming could have …’) and replace it with:
Climate change could have major economic impacts resulting either from the environment
or from transition effects in the economy.
Chapter 21
Section 0
In the diagram on page 3, delete the ‘Investment submission’ stage of the process (as this is no
longer covered in Chapter 22).
Section 3.2
At the bottom of page 22, delete ‘(See also the next chapter)’ as the material referred to has
been removed from Chapter 22.
Although it may appear that the stochastic simulation method would be superior, practical
experience has shown that the results from a stochastic model cannot always be relied
upon with sufficient confidence to justify the effort and expense involved.
More seriously, there is the danger of losing sight of key factors and assumptions in
looking at the output from such a model. Instead, the effort of working up a scenario
analysis by hand often forces the analyst to concentrate on the important risks and
assumptions.
Despite this, however, a comparatively simple stochastic model may be useful to simulate
one specific project activity, where the assumptions underlying the model, and its
limitations, can be kept clearly in view.
Practice Questions
There is an additional practice question for this chapter. A replacement page (28A/B) is attached
(with the question on one side and solution on the reverse).
Chapter 22
Section 3.1
After the second bullet point list on page 14, delete everything starting from ‘Each of these main
headings …’ as far as and including the paragraph on page 15 that starts ‘The cells in the matrix
…’. After doing this, the first paragraph of remaining Core Reading begins ‘Some of the risks
identified …’.
Section 6.3
Summary
If you would like the new assignments without marking, then retakers can purchase an updated
CMP or standalone X Assignments at a significantly reduced price. Further information on retaker
discounts can be found at: www.acted.co.uk/paper_reduced_prices.html.
If you wish to submit your scripts for marking but have only an old version, then you can order the
current assignments free of charge if you have purchased the same assignments in the same
subject in a previous year, and have purchased marking for the 2022 session. We only accept the
current version of assignments for marking, ie those published for the sessions leading to the
2022 exams.
For further details on ActEd’s study materials, please refer to the 2022 Student Brochure, which is
available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.
4.2 Tutorials
For further details on ActEd’s tutorials, please refer to our latest Tuition Bulletin, which is available
from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.
4.3 Marking
You can have your attempts at any of our assignments or mock exams marked by ActEd. When
marking your scripts, we aim to provide specific advice to improve your chances of success in the
exam and to return your scripts as quickly as possible.
For further details on ActEd’s marking services, please refer to the 2022 Student Brochure, which
is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.
ActEd is always pleased to receive feedback from students about any aspect of our study
programmes. Please let us know if you have any specific comments (eg about certain sections of
the notes or particular questions) or general suggestions about how we can improve the study
material. We will incorporate as many of your suggestions as we can when we update the course
material each year.
If you have any comments on this course, please send them by email to [email protected].
It is difficult for shareholders to monitor the day-to-day actions of the directors to ensure that
they are acting in the shareholders’ best interests. [1]
Maximising shareholder wealth is assessed via the performance of the share price. However, the
share price only reflects information that is in the public domain. [1]
The directors may choose to withhold information, eg if they believe that it is commercially
sensitive and would be of benefit to their competitors, and so the share price may not reflect the
company’s wealth immediately. [1]
In addition, the share price may rise simply because share prices in general are rising, and this
may have little to do with the actions of the directors of the company. [1]
It is difficult to be sure that directors are acting to maximise shareholder wealth and not in their
own interest, eg in the interests of their job security. [1]
The financial reports and auditor’s report provide some reassurance about such potential
conflicts, but it is not possible to check whether the results would have been better for the
shareholders if the directors had made different decisions. [1]
Companies may also have other objectives beyond simply maximising shareholder wealth,
including social and ethical responsibilities. [1]
[Maximum 5]
This might be, for example, to provide low-cost loans to small farmers in poor countries,
provide low-cost private schools or support vaccination programmes.
A social enterprise is a business with a clear social or environmental aim set out in its governing
documents. Social enterprises are defined by this aim of the business, not the legal form of the
business. A social enterprise could be, for example, a partnership, an LLP, a limited company with
shares or a company limited by guarantee.
There is a variety of capital and legal structures that a social enterprise can take and some
of these are not designed to attract a wide range of outside investors. However, social
enterprises can issue shares and dividends can be paid.
Social enterprises are businesses. They cannot totally rely on donations or volunteers to operate.
Once established, social enterprises must generate more than 50% of their income from their
trading activities. (However, they are allowed to rely on donations, grants etc initially in order to
get started.)
Social enterprises are distinguished from standard businesses by how they use their profits. A
social enterprise must use the majority of its profits towards furthering its social or environmental
mission, eg reinvesting them in the business or in the community. Unlike standard businesses,
social enterprises are not driven by the goal of maximising owner wealth.
The limited returns that can be provided by social enterprises means that they are likely to
be insignificant in the investment strategy of most financial insurance companies and
pension funds. However, there is a variety of ways in which financial intermediaries might
support social enterprises and investment funds are available which provide capital to the
sector.
Dhruv becoming a partner should avoid the risk of him leaving the business. [1]
This might be important to Alice as Dhruv is ‘long-serving’ and so may have acquired knowledge
and skills on which the business depends. [1]
Dhruv may also be motivated by the new responsibility and potential rewards of partnership. [1]
Dhruv would likely have to buy into the partnership. This cash might be invested in the business
and help it grow. [1]
As a partner, Dhruv will be entitled to an agreed share of the profits, which could be costly to
Alice. [1]
In a partnership, all partners are jointly and severally liable, and Alice would face the implications
of any mistakes Dhruv made (which may be more significant if Dhruv has more responsibilities as
a partner than as an employee). [1]
Partnerships have partnership agreements, where the rights of the partners are documented.
This would need to be changed to add Dhruv, which would involve costs. [1]
[Maximum 5]
For example, in many countries, it is not intended that pension funds and charities pay tax
on investment returns. However, corporations will often pay tax on profits that is not
reclaimable even by non-taxpayers.
Imagine a pension fund, which does not have to pay tax on its investment income, invests in
shares. When the pension fund receives dividends on those shares, the company paying the
dividends is paying them from its after-tax profits. The tax system may enable the pension fund
to reclaim the tax that has been paid. In many countries however, the tax system does not allow
such reclaiming.
The same is true of certain types of investment fund. This restricts investments in
instruments which would normally not bear tax (such as real estate or bonds) if these
investments are held in a legal form on which tax is levied at source.
A charity may want to invest via an investment fund (sometimes called a mutual fund or a
collective investment vehicle). Investment funds manage investments for a group of investors
and so provide investment expertise and diversification. For real estate (ie property) investment
for example, investing in a property investment fund would give the charity a share of a wide
range of properties, and so access to expertise and diversification it might lack if it instead
invested directly by buying properties.
However, if the charity invested in property directly, it might not have to pay any tax on the rental
income it would receive. If it invests via an investment fund, the investment fund receives the
rental income and then pays it out to investors in the fund. The investment fund may have to pay
tax on the rental income before it pays it out to investors, and investors such as the charity may
not be able to reclaim this tax paid.
Double taxation treaties (see Section 6) often cannot cope with this complexity.
Double taxation treaties between two countries may prevent the same income being taxed twice,
both in the country of origin as well as in the country of the recipient, but they cannot result in tax
being reclaimed.
Offshore jurisdictions include, for example, the Bahamas, Cayman Islands and Jersey.
To extend the example above, a real estate investment fund might be established in a
jurisdiction where no tax is payable on the returns. Investors from a wide range of
countries may then be able to invest in the fund. The investors will pay tax on the income
and capital gains at the appropriate rates in their own countries with the fund itself not
paying tax.
A UK pension fund investing in such a vehicle, for example, would pay no further tax.
However, a UK life insurance company would pay tax on the dividends received.
Although offshore investment funds can be abused in some situations, they are a method of
ensuring tax transparency and of ensuring that the tax paid is that due according to the
rules of the country in which a particular institution or individual live.
The main potential abuse here is that an investor may not disclose to the domestic tax authorities
their offshore investments and the returns they receive from them.
Chapter 3 Summary
Personal taxation
Personal taxation is levied on all the financial resources of an individual. The main sources
are:
income both earned (wages and salaries) and unearned (investment income and
rent)
profit from operating as a sole-trader or partner
capital gains
inheritance
wealth, eg property.
Individuals (including partnerships) are usually subject to income tax and may, in addition,
pay social security contributions.
Income tax is calculated with reference to taxable income, which includes income in kind,
such as subsidised mortgages, and also investment income.
Income tax liability may be reduced by tax relief on certain forms of income, such as income
from an ISA, and on certain forms of expenditure, such as contributions to an approved
pension scheme.
A person’s taxable income for a certain year will be reduced by any allowances to which they
are entitled, eg personal allowance, age-related allowance.
Capital losses can normally be offset against capital gains in the same year.
Individuals are usually given a CGT allowance (the annual exempt amount).
For an individual in the UK, typical CGT rates are 10% and 20% depending on taxable income.
Certain assets are exempt from CGT.
Company taxation
Companies are liable to corporation tax on their taxable profits. Taxable profits include both
income (less allowable expenses) and capital gains. A company’s accounting profit has to be
adjusted to taxable profit by:
adding back on any business expenses or potential expenditure that are not
allowable
adding back depreciation and deducting the capital allowance
deducting any special reliefs, eg research and development.
The government can use the corporation tax system to encourage or discourage certain
behaviour. For example, the government can encourage investment by taxing retained
profit less heavily than distributed profit.
Investors from a wide range of countries are then able to invest in the fund and pay tax on
the income and capital gains at the appropriate rates in their own countries.
These agreements allow companies and individuals with overseas income or capital gains to
offset tax paid overseas against their liability to domestic tax on such income or capital gains.
Most trading in them occurs through the banks rather than through a stock exchange.
Eurobonds are also used to raise large sums – the minimum acceptable issue is $75m or
more.
Similar to unsecured loan stock, Eurobonds are not secured against the assets of the issuing
company.
A key difference between Eurobonds and unsecured loans is that Eurobonds are marketed in a
different way. A Eurobond is an issue underwritten by an international syndicate of banks and
typically (but not exclusively) sold in countries other than the country of the currency in which it is
denominated. Issues are often marketed in several countries simultaneously.
Common currencies of issue include the US Dollar, the Japanese Yen and Sterling. Issues in these
currencies are respectively known as ‘Eurodollar’, ‘Euroyen’ and ‘Eurosterling’ issues.
Risk
There is no security for the loan. Also, Eurobond issues do not always place restrictions on the
issuing company’s future borrowing powers and so investors are very dependent upon the
profitability and good name of the issuing company. However, issuers of Eurobonds tend to be
large stable firms or institutions.
Return
Gross redemption yields depend upon the issuer (and hence risk) and issue size (and hence
marketability). Inflation will affect the real return achieved.
Marketability
Trading through the banks may mean that marketability is better than debentures and unsecured
loan stocks.
Conclusion
Eurobonds are unsecured loans subject to less regulation and are issued with either fixed or
floating rates of interest. They normally have a fixed maturity date.
Many UK borrowers prefer to issue fixed-interest bonds because they know their costs in advance
and can plan their cashflows. However, when interest rates are high, companies are reluctant to
borrow.
Floating-rate notes (FRNs) are medium-term debt securities issued in the Euro market
whose interest payments ‘float’ with short-term interest rates, possibly with a stipulated
minimum rate.
It is common for floating-rate notes to have a minimum interest rate below which the coupons
will not fall even if the benchmark interest rate falls lower. This is known as an interest-rate floor.
Thus, the issuer does not need to estimate the likely levels of future inflation and interest
rates when issuing the notes, and the lender does not require an inflation risk premium.
If inflation increases, then short-term interest rates tend to increase. A company that issues
floating-rate stock does not need to worry about future inflation. A company that issues fixed-
interest stock has to estimate future inflation in order to give a satisfactory return (after inflation)
to the investors. Investors too need to consider the risk of inflation wiping out the return
received from an investment. If they are uncertain about inflation they might demand a higher
interest rate from a fixed-interest stock as a premium to cover the risk they are taking.
In this sense, they are similar to debentures rather than unsecured loan stocks, because there are
assets that bond holders have a claim on in the event that there is a credit event. Indeed the ring-
fenced pool of assets generates the income to pay the interest on the ABS bonds, and generates
the capital to ensure that the bonds are repaid.
ABSs are normally issued in tranches (often called A, B and C) with different yields and
different levels of risk. Under this structure, A tranches may get high credit ratings and may
be sold to institutional investors.
If, for example, a pool of assets with a value of £500m is ring-fenced, ABS bondholders may be
offered a choice of three bonds to invest in. The first (bond A) has a prior claim on all of the ring-
fenced assets, and may have a nominal of, say, £300m. This issue would be considered to be very
secure and would get a top credit rating, irrespective of the credit rating of the company that was
raising the loan. It would also get a very low interest rate or coupon.
The second tranche (bond B) of say £150m may have the second claim on all of the ring-fenced
assets, and will be secure provided not more than £50m of the ring-fenced assets default. It may
get a reasonable or ‘investment-grade’ credit rating.
The bottom tranche of £50m (bond C) will have the last claim on the assets and will only get
income if there is enough left over after paying the interest on tranches A and B. It will probably
get a very low rating if it is rated at all.
ABSs may be backed by mortgages, in which case they are known as mortgage-backed
securities (MBSs). Alternatively, assets-backed securities may be backed by car loans,
unsecured personal loans, credit cards or other types of loan.
The type of asset that is ring-fenced, and the tranche of the bond in the structure, will determine
how secure the bondholders feel.
Question
Solution
The main difference is that the company issuing a debenture is still legally responsible for the
payment of interest and capital to the bondholders. So if the company goes bankrupt, and the
debenture holders find that the asset or security is not sufficient to repay their loan, then they
can claim against the company for any outstanding balance. Asset-backed loans are secured on a
ring-fenced pool of assets, and if those are insufficient to pay interest or capital, the bondholders
will be partially defaulted and they have no claim against the company itself.
Another difference is that debentures are issued as single bonds, secured by either floating or a
fixed charge on an asset (or on various named assets). Asset-backed bonds are typically issued in
a tranched structure offering various possible bonds to investors, all secured on the same pool of
assets.
There may be differences in the size and marketability of the bonds. Typically debentures are of
limited size, secured on a single large property, whereas asset-backed bonds can be very large
issues secured on very large pools of assets. There is almost no limit to the pool of assets, or the
type of assets for an asset-backed issue. Marketability will increase with the size of issue.
An ABS issue may partially default if there is not enough income or capital in the ring-fenced pool.
If a debenture partially defaults, the company is in default, and will be wound up by debenture
holders.
ABSs give investors access to lending assets, without having to issue their own loans.
So if an asset-backed bond issued by a bank is secured on credit card debt, the bond investors are
exposed to the credit risk of credit card debt. However, the bank (and not the bond holders) is
responsible for issuing the credit card debt to its customers.
Credit risk is reduced by the loans being secured on pools of assets and by the
diversification of loans within the pools of assets. In addition, the structuring reduces
credit risk on senior tranches.
Collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) are a form of ABS. CDOs backed by US sub-prime
mortgages came to be regarded as ‘toxic’ during the banking crisis of 2007-08.
CDOs secured on their own asset pool are as secure as the assets backing them. However, before
the banking crisis of 2007-08, it became the norm to issue CDOs secured on middle and lower
tranches of other asset-backed (typically mortgage-backed) bonds. As you can imagine, if a pool
of assets for a CDO comprises a large number of tranche B and tranche C bonds from the example
above, and the CDO itself is then tranched into D, E and F, then assessing the credit rating of these
tranches can become complicated to say the least. Complicated became dangerous in the
banking crisis, and the term ‘toxic’ was used to describe the CDO tranches.
So covered bonds are more like debentures in that the company remains legally responsible for
the payment of interest and capital to the bondholders. Bondholders have a ‘dual recourse’ to
reclaim their money, firstly from the issuing company and then secondly from the pool of assets.
They are often considered to be very secure and often receive a AAA rating.
You can think of CET1 as being very similar to the normal equity share capital that a typical
company would issue. The Basel regulations are global standards that most countries have
adopted, and which serve as the basis for bank regulation almost everywhere in the world.
Banks must hold sufficient capital to absorb losses that might arise, even in a severe stress
scenario such as a deep recession. However, banks are likely to be reluctant to hold
‘excess’ CET1 capital because it would reduce their earnings per share (a key measure for
investors) and because, without large losses, it might not be needed.
Earnings per share is calculated by dividing the earnings (ie the profit after tax) by the number of
equity shares. If a bank increases the number of shares in issue, this ratio falls and makes the
bank look less attractive to investors than competing banks.
Banks may therefore issue contingent convertible securities (see Section 3.2 below) which,
in the event of a capital trigger being breached, can be converted into CET1 capital. This
enables banks to access additional capital to absorb losses, should the need for it arise in a
very severe stress scenario. Contingent convertible securities issued by banks fall within a
category of bank capital known as Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital.
Equity capital can always be thought of as the capital that ‘absorbs losses’. If a company makes a
modest loss rather than a profit, the company’s lenders will still be paid, and equity shareholders
will see the value of their stake in the company fall. With a bank, the losses that can be made in
an economic crisis can be very substantial if bank assets are ‘written down’ in value, and in some
cases this can threaten the solvency of the bank itself. This can in turn threaten depositors who
the regulator wants to protect. Bank regulations therefore insist that a bank has a substantial
amount of lower-ranking equity capital so that losses don’t reduce the value of deposits.
Banks may also issue debt capital, as defined in the Basel regulations. Debt capital may not
be used to absorb losses as long as the bank remains a going concern. However, in the
event that the bank ceases to remain a going concern, debt capital can be used to absorb
losses, giving additional protection for depositors.
We discuss bank capital in much more detail in Chapter 13 where the Basel ratios are introduced.
Bank debt ranks alongside depositors, and so if a bank fails, it cannot default on bondholders but
choose not to default on depositors. It has to treat both equally. So in this sense bank debt
capital does not ‘absorb losses’ in that it does not protect depositors.
Chapter 4 Summary
Long-term finance
Long-term company finance can be classified as share capital and loan capital.
Ordinary shares are the most common type of share capital. They give rights to a share of
the residual profits of the company, and to the residual capital value if the company is
wound up, together with voting rights and various other rights. Banks are deemed to be of
special systemic importance and bank regulations place minimum limits on the amount of
equity capital a bank must have. Bank equity can be classed as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1)
which is designed to absorb bank losses and protect depositors.
Preference shares give their holders a preferential right to dividends and return of capital,
compared to ordinary shareholders. Preference shares usually pay a fixed dividend. They do
not normally give voting rights.
Holders of loan capital are creditors of the company. They do not have voting rights. They
receive interest payments which are a cost to the company, not a distribution of profits.
Interest is normally paid twice a year.
Debentures are loans which are secured on some or all of the assets of the company. They
are regulated by a Trust Deed which is overseen by a trustee. Debentures may be secured by
a fixed charge on specified assets, or by a floating charge across a class of assets.
With unsecured loan stock there is no specific security for the loan. Convertible unsecured
loan stocks give their holders the right to convert into ordinary shares of the company at a
later date.
Subordinated debt is junior debt and is paid after all senior debt holders are paid.
A Eurobond is a form of unsecured loan capital that is issued outside the legal and tax
jurisdiction of any country. It is a bearer document, paying interest normally once a year.
Interest is paid gross. It may pay a variable rate of interest, in which case it is known as a
floating-rate note.
An asset-backed security (ABS) is bond secured on a pool of ring-fenced assets, which might
be mortgages, credit card debt, car loans, or almost any other type of asset. The security of
the ABS depends on the quality of the assets in the pool, and investors can claim the assets
in the event that the ABS defaults. They have no claim on the company itself though, only
the ring-fenced assets. ABS issues are typically tranched into bonds with different credit
ratings.
Covered bonds are bonds issued by a company that have a ring-fenced pool of assets as an
additional security. The bonds are, however, secured by the company itself, and the assets
in the pool remain on the company’s balance sheet.
Hybrid types of finance that straddle the divide between debt and equity finance include
convertibles, contingent convertibles and executive stock options.
Risk
Debentures, asset-backed securities (ABSs) and covered bonds are the most secure form of
company capital from the investor’s perspective. Debentures are covered by a floating
charge over the company’s assets or a fixed charge on a specific asset. ABSs and covered
bonds have a ring-fenced pool of assets that act as security.
Eurobonds and unsecured loans are the next most secure for an investor – they have a prior
right to profits before preference share capital or ordinary shares, which are last on the list in
that order.
Convertibles will be as risky as the corresponding preference share or loan stock until they
are converted into equity, at which point the riskiness increases.
Return
Investors expect a higher return for accepting higher risk.
As such the expected return from each form of capital is in reverse order to the list for risk,
namely (highest to lowest): ordinary shares, preference shares, unsecured loans/Eurobonds,
and debentures/ABSs/covered bonds.
The actual cost to the company will be equal to the return achieved by the investor
(ultimately), however the immediate cost to the company of servicing the capital may be
higher for debt than for equity if the dividends are low or indeed if they are zero.
Marketability
Equity is often the most common form of company capital, and is as such often the most
marketable. The marketability of the other forms depends very much on the size of the
issue.
Tax
Most forms of company debt have the advantage that interest payments are deducted from
pre-tax profits in the company’s accounts and so help to reduce the company’s tax charge.
Ordinary and preference shares pay dividends that are deducted from the company’s profits
after tax.
It will include small companies that have decided they do not wish to go public.
It will also include companies where there is a strong family interest in ownership.
Companies may also not want the expense of dealing with the requirements of a
public listing.
Private equity status may also be important in situations where specialist knowledge
of the details of the company’s investment projects is required when taking
investment decisions (for example in tech companies or infrastructure).
The private equity sector can include smaller private companies, where the disadvantages of a
quotation in Section 1.3 above outweigh the advantages of a quotation. Family ownership might
cause shareholders to avoid the quoted markets so that an acquisitive company will find it harder
to buy enough shares to take over control of the company. A takeover will be much harder
without the communication benefits of the stock market.
Some large companies can also end up in the private equity sector. For example, the
pharmaceutical company Boots in the UK was purchased by a group of private shareholders
resulting in the company’s shares no longer being quoted on the London Stock Exchange. Boots
has subsequently gone through a number of purchases and sales, but for a time it was an example
of a large company that was being restructured in the private equity market.
Private equity has been growing rapidly whilst the value of publicly quoted companies has
shrunk on many markets in recent years. Insurance companies, banks and pension funds
can invest in private equity in a variety of ways:
1. They can provide loans or buy equity interests directly.
Loan investment would be called private debt, and equity investment would be private
equity.
2. They can also invest in bespoke private equity funds which, in turn, invest in a range
of private equity interests, the returns being passed to the investors in the funds.
There are some mutual funds and exchange-traded funds which allow retail
investments in private equity.
Question
State the benefits and drawbacks for an institution of investing in private equity using a collective
vehicle, such as a private equity fund, rather than investing directly.
Solution
Benefits
Better diversification by being part of a larger fund with many private equity investments
Access to the equity selection skills of the fund manager
Speedier investment in the sector which might otherwise take years
Possibly the ability to sell the shares in the fund at a later stage, which would be easier
than selling individual private equity shares
Drawbacks
Loss of control over which shares are purchased for the fund
The need to pay the fund fees, which may be high for such a specialist sector
As well as private equity being a potential investment for some insurance companies and banks,
other companies may use private equity themselves as a way of obtaining finance.
Private equity funds can be an important source of medium-term finance for companies,
including banks and insurance companies.
There are some examples of banks and insurance companies, particularly newer companies, that
have used private equity as a funding base to expand their operations. The best-known larger
insurance companies and banks tend to use the quoted markets.
Chapter 5 Summary
Reasons to obtain a stock exchange quotation
A company may decide to obtain a quotation on a stock exchange:
in order to raise extra capital
to make it easier for future issues of capital
to provide an exit route for its existing shareholders
to make its shares more easily valued and marketable.
Some companies prefer to remain in the ‘private equity’ domain where shares are not
quoted on an exchange. The reasons can include maintaining a family’s control over the
company, avoiding the expenses of quoted markets, or where having a tight group of
shareholders can benefit the business during a restructuring phase. It can also be beneficial
in specialist industries such as the tech industry.
Rights issues
Companies can raise more money from their existing shareholders by offering them a rights
issue.
A rights issue reduces the share price and increases both the share capital and reserves of
the company.
A bank loan is a form of medium-term borrowing from a bank where the full amount of the
loan is paid into the borrower’s current account and the borrower undertakes to make
interest payments and capital repayments on the full amount of the loan.
Bank loans are usually secured on the borrower’s assets using a floating charge, that is, all
the assets of the company (or the individual) are assigned as security for the loan.
For a small business, the owner of the company may even provide a fixed charge on his house as
security.
Bank loans can be used to buy non-current assets such as machinery and vehicles. Although loans
are usually secured, banks do sometimes grant unsecured loans.
It might be set at a margin above the bank’s own base rate, or as a margin over a benchmark
interest rate such as SONIA. (SONIA stands for the Sterling Overnight Index Average it is the
average rate at which banks borrow funds overnight from other financial institutions).
Although variable rate loans are usual, fixed rate bank loans do also exist.
Bank loans in the UK are typically for a period of about seven years, although the terms
offered vary.
In general, UK banks have been reluctant to lend for longer terms, preferring companies to use
loan capital and share capital for longer terms. In the EU, banks are more willing to lend longer
term, and loan capital is less important.
Loans are available where the borrower can take out the loan in instalments, giving the bank
a few days’ notice before each new bit is taken out. Such arrangements are called ‘loan
facilities’.
Companies often arrange lines of credit with their banks, enabling them to borrow money if
required, up to agreed limits.
A line of credit provides flexibility for the borrower with regards to the timing of the finance and
also how the borrower uses the money. Many lines of credit are ‘revolving’ which means that
once an amount has been repaid it becomes available again.
Other variations
Complex loans are available for large-scale borrowing. For example:
multi-currency loans
In these the bank acts as a middle man and arranges to borrow money in whichever
currency looks the best value to borrow in. The bank then swaps the loan into sterling or
whatever currency is required.
This would be used where the sums to be borrowed are larger than any one bank would
happily lend on a single project.
Solution
The expected rate of return on donation-based funding is a loss of the amount ‘invested’.
Pre-payment or reward-based ranks next highest, returning whatever is the financial value of the
reward. (An investor in this type of project presumably also derives some non-financial reward,
eg from the satisfaction of supporting a particular artist, author or film producer in producing new
work.)
As usual, debt finance would have a lower expected rate of return than equity-type finance in the
same business, and so loan-based funding ranks next and finally investment-based funding.
The different types of crowdfunding will have other relative advantages and disadvantages to a
business considering which to use to raise finance. For example:
Rewards-based funding might have lower cost, but it might also appeal to a smaller
number of potential investors, ie those who would value the particular reward.
Investment-based funding would potentially offer the longest delay before any return had
to be paid to investors, but at the cost of dilution of ownership and having to share future
profits if the venture ultimately succeeds.
Loan-based funding avoids this giving away of equity but a company might struggle to find
investors with a risk appetite to find it appealing, ie investors who want the relative
security of a loan in a potentially high-risk venture.
In addition to the risks we have already seen for loan and equity investment, the crowdfunding
approach brings additional risks, for example the lack of a secondary market (so risk of being
unable to cash in the investment), risks associated with the crowdfunding site collapsing, the risk
that the project may not go ahead if insufficient investors are found and uncertainty about how
long the call for funds will be open.
Peer-to-peer lenders such as Zopa and Funding Circle have established technology
platforms to match borrowers and lenders online. In practice, investors do not normally
invest in individual loans; their investment is matched with percentages of a large number
of loans. This reduces risk for investors, relative to investing in single loans.
The exact mechanics of this splitting of investors’ investments vary between platforms. For
example, the platform operator might assess the creditworthiness of loan applicants and allocate
them a risk rating and loan interest rate accordingly. Investors may then choose how they’d like
to split their investments into proportions loaned to different businesses at different levels of risk
and return.
The platform manages the payments, collecting repayments from lenders and distributing them
to investors. Investors may be able to choose whether they receive the repayments as cash or re-
invest them into further lending.
Loans available on peer-to-peer lending platforms include unsecured personal loans, car
loans and small business loans.
Investors are typically individuals looking for income and willing to accept the credit risk,
but also include some institutional investors.
Individuals may be attracted to peer-to-peer lending as the interest rates may look attractive
when compared with those available on bank savings.
Question
Suggest possible reasons why institutional investors may be attracted to peer-to-peer lending.
Solution
As for individuals, institutions may find the expected returns attractive for the level of risk
It provides access to a sector and type of borrower that institutions may not have been
able to reach otherwise
Diversification from their other investments, eg equities and bonds
Peer-to-peer lenders do not accept deposits and are not banks. However, they are regulated
– in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and in the US by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC).
In the UK, the FCA rules cover, for example, the marketing of P2P lending to investors and levels
of disclosure of information to investors. However, peer-to-peer lending is not covered by the
Financial Services Compensation Scheme that protects individuals’ savings (up to a limit) if a bank
or insurance company goes bust.
4 Microfinance
Microloans are small loans that are usually easier and faster to secure than the traditional
loans.
No interest is paid on the loan and the investor has the benefit of being involved in initiating
a venture. Microloans are used for start-ups and small businesses and often have generous
repayment periods. Charities involved in reducing poverty and promoting small scale start-
ups in the developing countries use microfinance to encourage investors to fund small
scale businesses.
However, although there may be no interest payable, the costs of providing microloans have to be
borne by the parties involved (in some proportions). These costs are likely to be high compared
to the relatively small loan amounts involved.
The model has attractions to both charities and donors when compared to charitable donations.
In particular, microloans aim to be a sustainable model for benefiting a neighbourhood or
community. For example, a charity may lend to a family to enable them to start a small scale
business, eg selling clothes or food products. This may have wider benefits such as the family’s
children staying in education longer rather than having to work to provide for the family. The
business may provide jobs for other members of the community. The charity may provide
support in setting up and running the business venture. When the loan is repaid, the money may
be returned to the original investor or they may make it available to help someone else in the
same community.
If a charity is involved in the provision of the loan, the charity may provide expertise and support
on the ground, as well as the money. This may be costly, but should also increase the chances of
success.
It can also be argued that microloans have disadvantages for the recipients compared to
charitable donations. For example, there is the risk of failed business ventures and increased
indebtedness of the loan recipients.
This page has been left blank so that you can keep the chapter
summaries together for revision purposes.
Chapter 7 Summary
Shadow banking
Shadow banks are non-bank financial institutions that convert short-term liabilities to long-
term assets outside the regulated banking system.
Unlike banks, shadow banks do not take deposits but instead borrow short term funds in the
money market.
Since shadow banks are outside the banking regulatory system, they are not subject to capital
requirements and reserve requirements imposed on the commercial banks. However, they
are not able to borrow from the central banks and are thus more exposed in an emergency.
To reduce the exposure of the traditional banks to shadow banks and the effect on the
economy as a whole, in future shadow banks are likely to be increasingly subject to the same
banking regulation as regular banks.
Crowdfunding
Crowdfunding enables a large number of participants support a business, project, campaign
or an individual. Often the profile of a project is set up on a dedicated crowdfunding website.
Participants decide the amount they wish to contribute to fund a particular venture.
Microfinance
Microloans are small loans that are usually easier and faster to secure than traditional loans.
No interest is paid on the loan and the investor has the benefit of being involved in initiating a
venture.
Charities involved in reducing poverty and promoting small scale start-ups in the developing
countries use microfinance to encourage investors to fund small scale businesses.
A donation-based
B pre-payment
C loan-based
D non-recourse. [2]
7.3 Outline the similarities and differences between shadow banking and regular banking. [5]
7.4 Discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages to individual investors of peer-to-peer lending
platforms opening up to also allow institutional investors to lend money. [5]
Chapter 7 Solutions
7.1 Answer = D
7.2 Answer = A
Project finance is a non-recourse, off-balance sheet method of obtaining finance. It often involves
public-private partnerships, but does not have to involve the public sector.
7.3 Similarities
Both face the risk of investors losing confidence which can create a liquidity risk. [1]
Differences
In regular banking, the liabilities are cash deposits from banking customers. Shadow banks do not
take deposits. Instead they borrow money in the money markets. [1]
Customers in regular banks may demand the return of their deposits. The bank will not hold
enough in cash to meet this demand if a large number of customers want their money at the
same time. [1]
Shadow banks may struggle to roll over their short-term borrowings, for example if investors are
concerned about the value of the shadow banks assets. [1]
Shadow banks are outside the banking regulatory system and so are not subject to the reserve
and capital requirements imposed on regular banks. [1]
Shadow banks are not able to borrow from the central bank and so are more exposed in an
emergency. [1]
[Maximum 5]
7.4 Advantages
More institutions investing may enable platforms to expand the scale of their operations and this
may lead to economies of scale, which individuals may benefit from via lower platform charges.
[1]
More institutional investment will put more capital into the sector and this might make platforms
more secure and so less likely to go bust. [1]
Disadvantages
Platforms may struggle to attract sufficient potential borrowers to meet the increase in demand
caused by institutions looking to invest large amounts. [1]
This may lead to individuals missing out on the best investments … [1]
… or the platform may lend to higher-risk borrowers increasing the riskiness of individuals’
lending. [1]
Institutions typically invest larger amounts than individuals, and this may cause problems when
they wish to withdraw their money, eg if an institution wishes to disinvest it may disrupt the
platform. [1]
[Maximum 5]
In practice, a large group would find it almost impossible to permit a subsidiary to fail
without compensating the company’s creditors because of the negative publicity it would
cause. It is also possible to insist on a formal guarantee from the parent as a condition of
granting a loan to a group member.
Any support between group members could be restricted by the overseas location of some
subsidiaries, and therefore subject to exchange restrictions or other local regulations which
prohibit the payment of funds back to head office.
It is also notable that the accounting techniques associated with consolidated financial
statements has recently been one of the most controversial areas for regulators.
Question
Solution
A subsidiary is a company controlled by a parent company. This control may be through holding a
majority of voting rights or by being able to appoint or remove directors holding a majority of
voting rights at board meetings.
An associated undertaking is one which is not a subsidiary, but which is subject to significant
influence by the parent. A significant influence would normally arise if the parent owned
between 20% and 50% of the associate’s voting rights.
The non-controlling interest is the value of the share capital and reserves provided by the
subsidiary’s minority shareholders.
2 Insurance companies
2.1 Introduction
Insurance companies are effectively subject to the same reporting regime as any other type of
limited company. As for other companies, a statement of financial position and a statement of
profit or loss must be produced.
For most companies, the concept of profit is relatively intuitive. If a company sells an item of
stock for more than it costs to make, it makes a profit. For an insurance company, the concept of
profit is not so clear-cut.
When a policy is sold, the policyholder pays the company a premium and the company incurs
sales and administration expenses. However, at this point the company does not know how much
profit it will make as the policy may last for many years, during which time the company will have
to pay claims and incur expenses and further premiums may be paid.
To allow for these future cashflows, the company will set up an estimated liability (a reserve) in its
statement of financial position. A conservative approach may be adopted in estimating this to
avoid too much profit being made at the start of the policy.
The underlying contracts (liabilities) fall due outside the accounting period and are
uncertain in size.
This section looks at the special features of insurance company accounts. We consider both
general insurance (short-term insurance, eg car or buildings insurance) and long-term insurance
(eg life insurance).
Premiums already received in respect of such liabilities need to be identified and held until
the liabilities have expired.
Additional sums may have to be set aside to meet any anticipated worsening in claims
experience or any failure by third parties to honour their commitments towards meeting
eventual liabilities.
Regulatory requirements, such as those under the Solvency II regime, may increase further
the amounts held against future liabilities.
Therefore, the provisions (reserves) made for future liabilities are likely to be conservative
in nature, with the result that current profit is under-stated.
This feature is exacerbated by the profit profile of long-term contracts, whereby business
written initially causes a financial strain due to the costs of setting up the contracts and
establishing adequate initial reserves.
There may be a loss on the policy in the early years, due to the initial expenses and the need to
set up initial reserves. This is known as new business strain.
However, the product design will provide for these initial costs to be subsequently
recovered, and will also aim to provide an overall return to the company. The question
arises as to when (and how) this profit should be reported.
For example, general insurance may be taxed differently from long-term insurance.
The second section then brings together the total revenue from the two types of business and
adds in any profit made on other non-insurance business. To this is added other items such as the
investment return on investments other than those supporting the insurance business and tax on
profit to give the overall profit to shareholders.
The statement of profit or loss typically starts with revenue accounts for each area of
business of the form:
Each revenue account will take the form:
Earned premiums (net of reinsurance)
+ Investment income
+ Realised capital gains
where the investment income and realised capital gains are those earned on the
investments held to cover the insurance liabilities. There may need to be transfers from the
reserves to cover the actual liabilities which are payable.
There may be additional items in the revenue account depending, for example, on company
practice, accounting standards eg IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts), regulatory requirements
eg Solvency II, or the purpose of the accounts.
The balances on the revenue accounts can then be transferred to the statement of profit or
loss:
where investment income and capital gains are those earned on investments relating to
shareholders’ funds / free reserves.
‘Other ordinary activities’ would be other business activities of the company that are not
general or long-term insurance business.
We can see that some of the assets of the business cover the liabilities and some of the assets
cover the equity capital (or shareholders’ fund or free reserves).
The statement of financial position contains the usual items plus, typically, these additional
entries:
Assets
Assets held to cover insurance liabilities
Insurance companies consider the term of their liabilities and invest in appropriate assets.
For example, long-term insurers tend to invest in medium- and long-term assets whereas
general insurers tend to invest in short-term assets.
Assets representing free reserves
The shareholders’ fund or free reserves is the value of the share capital and reserves of
the business. The greater the free reserves, the more freedom the company has in its
investment policy, eg it could invest in long-term assets that yield a greater return.
Reinsurers' share of technical provisions (see below)
If the insurer is using reinsurance, then the reinsurer will pay the insurer for their share of
the claims. This can be shown as an asset in the balance sheet.
Trade receivables arising out of direct insurance operations (policyholders,
shareholders)
These are amounts owed to the company by policyholders or sales intermediaries.
Liabilities
Fund for future appropriations
This is a type of reserve applicable to some old types of life-insurance business.
Technical provisions:
long-term insurance business provisions, including the actuarially estimated
value of the company’s liabilities including bonuses already declared and
after deducting the actuarial value of future premiums.
general insurance business provisions, including unexpired risk reserves
and outstanding claims reserves.
The unexpired risk reserve is to cover the claims and expenses that are expected
to emerge from an unexpired period of cover.
The outstanding claims reserve is to cover the claims and expenses for all
outstanding claims that have not yet been settled.
Shareholders’ fund
In insurance company accounts, the assets less the liabilities equals the shareholders’
funds.
Insurance company accounts will be considered in more detail in the relevant Specialist
subjects.
Similar issues arise with respect to pension scheme accounts. Again, the relevant
Specialist subjects will address these.
Question
State where the following items appear in the accounts of an insurance company.
Solution
(i) P1
(iii) L
(iv) A
Liabilities Assets
(money a bank owes) BANK (money a bank is owed)
Equity capital
The diagram above shows how a bank would generate income on the right from its assets, and
pay interest to those that it has borrowed from on the left.
The assets of a bank include cash (including reserves held at their central bank), loans to
personal and corporate customers, bonds, equities and other securities.
A bank’s assets comprise of investments that are due to be paid back to the bank over time such
as loans and overdrafts given to individuals or companies, credit card debt, corporate and
government debt that the bank has purchased, deposits of cash that the bank must have with the
central bank, and certain other money market instruments that are ‘highly marketable and liquid’.
The liabilities of a bank include deposits made by personal and corporate customers,
wholesale funding and the bank’s capital. The total amounts of assets and liabilities must
be equal.
Wholesale funding consists of money borrowed in the money markets, usually from other banks.
A bank can also raise money in the same way as other companies by issuing unsecured bonds in
the stock market. Where these rank alongside depositors (as is usual), they are treated the same
as other deposits.
Within a bank’s liabilities, its capital must include equity capital, in the form of Common
Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital (see Chapter 4, Section 2), and may include contingent
convertibles (see Chapter 4, Section 3.2) and debt capital (see Chapter 4, Section 1.1). CET1
capital can be used to absorb losses, including credit losses on loans, market losses on
investments in bonds, equities and other securities, and operational losses from fraud,
processing and customer-facing activities.
The way a regulator views capital can sometimes seem the wrong way round. In the event of a
bank making losses, the regulator wants to ensure that the depositors and unsecured lenders are
protected. If a liability ranks above those depositors, such as a debenture, the regulator will not
view it as protection. If capital ranks below depositors, such as equity or preference shares, the
regulator will view it as protection in a crisis. The lower it ranks, the ‘better’ the capital is, which
is why equity capital is regarded as CET1 or ‘tier 1’ capital in the regulators’ eyes.
A bank’s assets must include sufficient cash or near cash, qualifying as high quality liquid
assets (HQLAs), to provide a liquidity buffer against possible outflows of deposits during a
30 calendar day period of significant liquidity stress. This liquidity buffer is intended to
avoid a run on the bank, which might happen if it was not able to meet demands to withdraw
deposits.
Some of the information above relates to ‘Basel III’ regulations which are due to come into effect
in January 2023. Banks currently operate under Basel II which has slightly less stringent
requirements.
1. CET1 capital ratio: the ratio of a bank’s CET1 capital to its total risk-weighted assets
(a measure of the scale and degree of a bank’s risks, across credit risk, market risk
and operational risk). A bank’s CET1 capital ratio must be at least 7%. However, at
the end of 2019 (ie before the Covid-19 pandemic), many European banks had CET1
capital ratios around twice the minimum of 7%.
2. Liquidity coverage ratio: the ratio of a bank’s high quality liquid assets to its
expected outflows over a 30 calendar day period of significant liquidity stress. This
ratio must be at least 100%.
3. Loan to deposit ratio: the ratio of a bank’s personal and corporate loans to its
personal and corporate deposits. A high loan to deposit ratio might suggest over-
reliance on wholesale funding, which are generally regarded as less stable.
A bank’s ‘risk-weighted assets’ is a measure of the risk that the bank is taking, much of which will
be default risk. If a bank owns a loan of £200m to a corporate entity which is rated ‘A’ by a credit
rating agency, the Basel regulations will assign a risk weighting to that loan, such as 50%. The risk-
weighted assets would then be calculated as 50% of £200m which equals £100m. If the loan was
made to a more highly-rated entity such as ‘AA+’, the weighting might drop to 20% to reflect the
lower risk. The sum of these across all assets reflects the total credit risk exposure and is referred
to as the risk-weighted assets. It is complicated by the addition of risk-weighted assets that
reflect other risks such as operational and market risks, but the concept is the same; the more
risky the bank’s operations, the higher the risk-weighted assets.
If a bank has total risk-weighted assets of £4,000m, and has equity capital of £360m, then it would
£360
have a ratio of 9% which exceeds the 7% minimum. If the ratio fell below the 7%
£4,000
minimum, the bank would either have to make its assets more secure, or raise equity capital in
the stock market.
The reason for the ‘loan to deposit’ ratio requirement is to ensure that banks do not rely too
heavily on money raised from other banks in the wholesale money markets. During the banking
crisis, the money markets dried up, and banks that relied on that source of deposits found
themselves unable to raise cash for their day-to-day operations. Many of these bank either failed
or required central bank loans to survive. The regulators do not want this situation to repeat
itself and therefore insist that banks have a sizeable proportion of their deposits raised from
individual or corporate deposits.
Expenses
Impairments
= Profit before tax
Tax
= Earnings for shareholders
Banks receive two types of income: net interest income and non-interest income.
Net interest income is interest received on interest-earning assets less interest paid on
interest-earning liabilities. Non-interest income includes fees and commissions and trading
profits. Non-interest income often represents a low proportion of a bank’s total income.
Within a bank’s expenses, some items can be related to product categories. However, a
large proportion of a bank’s expenses is likely to be shared costs, for activities such as
central functions, IT, Treasury, marketing and distribution (including the costs of branch
networks).
Impairments include credit losses. Under the previous accounting standard for financial
instruments, IAS 39, impairments included credit losses as they were incurred. However,
from 1 January 2018, under IFRS 9, impairments must include provisions for expected credit
losses. Credit losses are subsequently written off against these provisions.
Question
In the past, banks took impairment costs when there was ‘evidence’ that a credit loss had
occurred. What are the advantages and disadvantages of requiring banks to make provisions for
credit losses that are expected to occur in the future?
Solution
Advantages
If the bank predicts that a loan is on a declining path and that the credit rating is likely to be
reviewed downwards, then the bank will recognise the loss earlier. This is a more prudent
approach.
The bank will model its credit portfolio, anticipating business cycles, and the effects of
unexpected events such as a pandemic. This will allow shareholders to see the impact of these
events earlier than if the bank was to wait until losses occurred.
Disadvantages
The process involves modelling the credit worthiness of an entity, which is by its very nature a
subjective assessment. It could turn out to be overly prudent, or not prudent enough.
Accountants believe that financial statements that are overly prudent can be as misleading as
those that are not prudent enough.
Credit losses often rely very heavily on business cycles and ‘black swan’ events. These are almost
impossible to predict, so the modelling could be largely guesswork.
1. Net interest margin (NIM): this is total net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets. The NIM of a bank is typically around 2%. Net interest
spread (NIS) is the difference between the average interest rate received on assets
and the average interest rate paid on deposits. A bank’s NIM and NIS may fluctuate
over a business cycle, in response to greater or lesser competitive pressure.
The difference between NIM and NIS is very fine, and they can be viewed as being very
similar measures. If a bank has interest earning assets of £1,000m on which is earns £60m
interest, and has interest bearing liabilities of £1,200m on which it pays out £30m, then:
£60m £30m
NIM = 3% and
£1,000m
£60m £30m
NIS = 3.5% .
£1,000m £1,200m
2. Cost/income ratio: this is the ratio of a bank’s expenses to its total income. The
cost/income ratio of a bank is typically around 60% to 70%. A bank’s cost/income
ratio indicates its operational efficiency. However, in comparing banks, allowance
must be made for different cost/income ratios associated with different business
mixes.
3. Return on capital: this is the ratio of a bank’s after-tax earnings to its total capital.
Investors in banks normally focus on return on equity (CET1) capital. This is a key
measure of the performance of a bank.
Chapter 13 Summary
Group accounts
Consolidated accounts are needed when one company owns a substantial proportion of
another company. These accounts reflect the operations of the whole group owned by the
parent or holding company, including its subsidiaries and associated companies.
Subsidiary company
Company S is said to be a subsidiary company of holding Company H when Company H has a
controlling interest in Company S, ie holds the majority of the shares of Company S or controls
the board of directors of Company S in some other way.
If H owns less than 100% of the shares in S, S is a partially owned subsidiary. The portion held
by other shareholders is termed the non-controlling interest.
Consolidated accounts must be produced. This basically involves adding up the items in the
statement of profit and loss and the statement of financial position, presenting the statements
as if the group is a single unit. Any interrelationships between members of the group are
cancelled.
Associated company
Company A is an associate of Company H if Company H has an investment in the shares of
Company A that gives Company H a significant influence but not control over Company A.
Normally, a holding by H of between 20% and 50% of A’s shares will make A an associate of H.
The consolidated statement of profit or loss and statement of financial position of the group
include single line entries showing the parent company’s share of the associate’s income,
assets and liabilities.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the value paid for a subsidiary company over the value to
the predator company of the share of assets purchased. It is shown in the consolidated
statement of financial position of the group.
Non-controlling interest
In the consolidated statement of financial position, the value of the subsidiary’s share capital
and reserves that is owned by minority (non-controlling) shareholders is shown separately in
the equity section, after the capital and reserves attributable to equity holders.
Insurance companies
Insurance companies complete their accounts in a manner comparable to other limited
companies, but the preparation of insurance company accounts is complicated by two
special features:
The underlying contracts (liabilities) fall due outside the accounting period and are
uncertain in size.
Premature transfer of ‘profit’ to shareholders may endanger the financial stability of
the company and the ability to meet future liabilities.
The first section shows the revenue made on the main insurance business and is split into a
general business account and a long-term business account.
The second section adds in other sources of profit to show the profit attributable to
shareholders.
The statement of financial position has the usual items plus typically, for assets:
Assets held to cover insurance liabilities
Assets representing free reserves
Reinsurers' share of technical provisions
Trade receivables arising out of direct insurance operations
Trade receivables arising out of reinsurance operations
Prepayments and accrued income
and for liabilities:
Fund for future appropriations
Technical provisions for long-term and general insurance business.
Banks
Banks earn profits by earning more interest on their assets than they are required to pay to
finance their liabilities. The difference is called the Net Interest Spread (NIS) or Net Interest
Margin (NIM). In addition, a bank will need to regularly assess ‘impairments’ to the values of
some assets, which will lead to further losses, and banks will earn profits from other
activities referred to as ‘non-interest income’.
Banks are heavily regulated to protect depositors in the event that the bank makes losses.
This regulation can involve:
requiring a bank to hold capital that ranks lower than depositors (for example, equity
capital or Core Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital)
requiring a bank to hold a proportion of its assets in highly marketable instruments
ensuring that the riskiness of a bank’s asset portfolio, as measured by its risk-
weighted assets, is not excessive with respect to its equity capital buffer.
Three key accounting ratios that reflect a bank’s balance sheet strength include:
CET1 capital
1. CET1 capital ratio which equals
risk-weighted assets
Three key accounting ratios that help analyse a bank’s profitability include:
4. Net Interest Margin (NIM)
5. Cost to income ratio
6. Return on capital employed.
The practice questions start on the next page so that you can
keep the chapter summaries together for revision purposes.
Exam style All of the questions that follow are exam style.
13.1 A Ltd paid £400,000 for 200,000 shares in B Ltd. B Ltd’s share capital was 250,000 £1 ordinary
shares, and at the time of the share purchase it had reserves of £125,000. Calculate the goodwill
associated with this purchase.
A £25,000
B £100,000
C £200,000
D £275,000 [2]
It has a 35% holding in Worthington Ltd and has a right to appoint 6 of the 10 directors.
It has a 55% holding in Bartley Ltd and has used its voting rights to appoint all of its directors.
It has a 25% holding in Dudley Ltd and has a right to appoint 3 of the 10 directors.
13.3 Which of the following items does NOT occur in the ‘revenue account’ of insurance company
accounts?
A earned premiums
B claims incurred
C investment income on investments relating to shareholders’ funds
D realised capital gains on investments held to cover insurance liabilities [2]
13.4 Describe how non-controlling interests are treated in a consolidated statement of financial
position, explaining why they are treated in this way. [5]
13.5 Company A takes over Company B. Immediately before the takeover, Company B’s statement of
financial position appeared as follows:
Company B £000s
Non-current assets 240
Current assets 190
Assets 430
Ordinary share capital (10p shares) 60
Reserves 250
Long-term debt 120
Share capital and liabilities 430
The terms of the offer made to B’s shareholders for every nine shares held in B were:
3 shares (50p market value each) in A plus
90p cash plus
2 £2 convertible preference shares in A (valued at par).
The terms of the conversion on the £2 preference shares are 5 ordinary shares for each £2
preference share.
Calculate the goodwill which will initially appear in A’s consolidated accounts as a result of the
offer assuming
13.6 Shareholders of DEF bank have expressed their unhappiness at the low return that they achieve
profits before tax
on their equity investment, which they define to be . The rate of
share capital + equity reserves
return appears to be below what shareholders in other banks earn.
Describe what steps DEF’s management could take to improve the return and state the drawbacks
of any such actions. [5]
Chapter 13 Solutions
13.1 Answer = B
200 ,000
Goodwill is calculated as 400 ,000 (250 , 000 125,000) 100, 000
250 ,000
13.2 Answer = B
The parent company has a controlling interest in Bartley and Worthington but not Dudley.
13.3 Answer = C
The revenue account is concerned with revenue from normal insurance business. Investment
income on investments relating to shareholders’ funds appears in the P&L (the second section).
13.4 Non-controlling (or ‘minority’) interests are shown as a separate item in a consolidated statement
of financial position. [1]
Minority interests are shown in the equity section, after the capital and reserves attributable to
equity holders. [1]
Therefore it would not be acceptable to simply include the appropriate percentage of net assets
(as would be the case for an associate company). [1]
Instead, on consolidation, all of the subsidiary’s assets are included (including goodwill) along with
a separate item to identify non-controlling interests. [1]
[Total 5]
13.5 (i) Goodwill arising assuming conversion does not take place
60 , 000
Number of shares in B = 600 , 000 [1]
0.1
1
Value of A’s offer = (3 0.50 0.9 2 2) 600,000 £426 , 667 [1]
9
1
Value of A’s offer = (3 0.50 0.9 2 5 0.50) 600,000 £493 , 333 [1]
9
There are a number of ways that DEF could increase the return up the level of its competitors,
which include:
investing the bank’s assets in more risky assets, with lower credit ratings, which earn a
higher return [1]
reducing the amount of equity capital through a share buyback [1]
increasing the size of the bank by making more loans and creating more interest-earning
assets [1]
improving efficiency and cutting costs such that the cost to income ratio is improved. [1]
The main problem with the first three of these suggestions is that DEF’s capital ratio will suffer. A
reduction in equity capital will lower the ratio, and an increase in risk or an increase in size will
increase the risk-weighted assets. [1]
If the bank breaches the Basel capital guidelines it will be investigated by regulators. [1]
If the bank cuts costs by shedding staff, its risk control functions may suffer and its operational
risk may increase, which would also increase the bottom line of the Basel capital ratio. [1]
[Maximum 5]
Current assets are assets that are either cash or will be converted into cash in the normal
course of business and consist of short-term investments including cash, trade receivables
and inventory.
Current liabilities are liabilities that are due for payment within one year. Typical examples
would be short-term loans, overdrafts and trade payables, all of which provide funds to
finance current assets.
Insufficient liquidity (ie insufficient cash to meet the company’s liabilities) could lead to:
bankruptcy, or
liquidation.
For example, if wage bills are not settled then the workforce will strike and if trade payables
are not settled on time then the business will be unable to buy further goods on credit.
There are particular examples of this during the coronavirus pandemic when many firms
were pushed into bankruptcy through inadequate cash and where some governments tried
to alleviate this through the rapid provision of bank loans and grants.
On the other hand, excessive investment in cash and liquid assets would tie up funds in
assets that generally offer little or nothing in the way of return. A company needs to have
sufficient current assets available to meet immediate commitments, but it is inefficient to
have excessive working capital.
In balancing these, a company will be aware that insufficient working capital can lead to a major
crisis. It is generally safer to risk having too much working capital than too little.
Accounting ratios can be used to measure a company’s liquidity and effectiveness of the
management of its assets.
The current and quick ratios give us a valuable insight into the relationship between current
assets and current liabilities.
Three other accounting ratios are also relevant; each measures the time taken to dispose of,
or settle, an element of working capital.
Time taken to
Accounting ratio Turnover period
perform function
As an asset
management/turnover ratio,
The average time shows how current assets are
Inventory turnover taken to sell an item managed over time.
period of inventory after it
has been purchased Inventory turnover period
depends on the production
cycle of the industry.
As an asset
management/turnover ratio,
The time taken to shows how current assets are
Trade receivables managed over time.
collect payment from
turnover period
a credit customer Trade receivables turnover
period is determined by credit
terms offered by the firm.
Suppose we have calculated these three efficiency ratios with the following results:
This suggests that the company takes 32 days to sell an item of inventory. If it is sold on credit,
this will result in a trade receivable which will then take an average of 44 days for settlement. So,
it takes a total of 32 + 44 = 76 days from the acquisition of an item of inventory until there is cash
flowing in from its subsequent sale and the customer’s settlement.
However, the company only pays for goods on average 39 days after their purchase. This means
that it does not have cash tied up in this sequence until day 39 and so the company only has cash
committed for a total of 76 – 39 = 37 days.
The working capital cycle (or net operating cycle) of the firm is the time from payment to
suppliers for the materials to receiving cash from the sale of goods produced from the
materials.
Shorter operating cycles enable the company to generate cash faster and reduce the need
for liquid assets and external financing.
Looking at financial ratios over time or comparing the ratios with those of a peer group will
provide a good indication of company’s performance.
compels organisations to recognise that actions taken now have implications for the
future
recognises the variety of stakeholders that are involved in the organisation and
encourages businesses to consider the overall public interest in the decision-making
process
The major contributor to the development of international standards is the Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI), an international independent organisation, which provides the world’s most
widely used standards on sustainability reporting.
Its guidelines, first reported in 2000, are broken down into three categories
economic
social
environmental
with various ‘aspects’ under each category.
For example, under the environmental category, different aspects are related to emissions;
water; and effluents and waste.
Some companies have been producing sustainability reports for many years – in fact,
according to the Global Reporting Initiative 2017, 92% of the world’s largest 250
corporations currently report on their sustainability performance.
In fact, sustainability issues, particularly climate-related ones, are now more frequently
expected to form part of the main financial reports.
Question
Solution
Reporting carbon emissions allows stakeholders to appreciate how much financial risk is
faced from the pricing of carbon emissions (including through the risk of reduced
allocations under emissions trading systems, or carbon tax increases) or from having to
stop using assets due to their polluting effects.
An emissions trading system is an approach a government may adopt to address pollution and
meet its emissions targets. Under such a system, the government sets an overall limit on
emissions (this limit will typically reduce over time) and issues permits to emit. Organisations
which do not emit carbon (or emit less than their permits allow) can then trade permits with
organisations with carbon emissions exceeding their permitted allowance.
Reporting carbon emissions also allows shareholders and stakeholders to have more
information about sustainability issues so that they can base decisions on the policies and
actions of the company.
Companies that want to be attractive to the widest possible range of shareholders and other
stakeholders (customers, employees etc) will be conscious of their policy choices and their
reporting of carbon emissions and other sustainability issues.
There is a danger that companies report the good news and hide the bad. Such
behaviour leads to a lack of credibility in the reports.
Question
Suggest ways in which the potential problem of companies reporting only good news may be
addressed.
Solution
Possibilities include:
companies reporting comparisons with any external benchmarks or industry standards,
not just their own internal performance measures
consistency over time in what information companies report
companies always including areas requiring improvement in their reports.
Which of the following is the least likely reason for a company making improvements to its
sustainability reporting?
This may be done because the relevant business unit is not earning a sufficient
return on the equity needed to support it.
It may be because a potential buyer for a business unit may value it more highly
than the existing owner (perhaps because the potential buyer will manage it more
effectively or be able to gain better synergies with the rest of its business).
A company might wish to divest units because it wishes to change its strategy
(either in relation to the focus of the business or in terms of its international
interests).
Trading in some countries might also become unprofitable or difficult for political
reasons.
5.1 Examples
Perhaps some of these points are best illustrated by two hypothetical examples.
It decides to sell the majority of its European business to another health insurer
which can obtain greater economies of scale and to use the capital to develop
operations in further Asian countries.
2. An insurance company sells a variety of life and annuity business and has always
had its own investment management subsidiary. It has sold a limited amount of unit
trust business. However, it now finds that all its life business is best matched by
portfolios of government and corporate bonds and thus does not need a general
investment management operation. The rate of return on the capital invested in the
investment management subsidiary has fallen.
It decides to close the subsidiary whilst selling the unit trust business to a specialist
fund management company.
A recent example of a significant divestment is the sale by Lloyds of the TSB business and
a large number of branches, though this was an action required as a result of decisions by
the European Union rather than being a business decision. Another example, outside the
financial sector, is the sale by Whitbread, a hotel and restaurant group, of the Costa Coffee
chain to Coca Cola.
Question
Solution
Whitbread could have narrowed its strategy to focus more on its hotel business. The proceeds
from the sale of Costa Coffee may give it cash to enable it to invest in its hotel brands and expand
its number of hotels.
The price offered by Coca Cola may have exceeded Whitbread’s valuation of Costa Coffee if the
synergies to Coca Cola (eg diversifying and achieving economies of scale within the drinks sector)
were greater than those available to Whitbread.
Chapter 18 Summary
Motives for growth
The main motives are:
to increase profitability benefiting from economies of scale, increasing market share
and expansion into new and growing markets
to increase security in terms of threat to and from other companies, barriers to
entry, diversification, lower transaction costs, volatility, reputation
motivation for employees and managers in terms of power, prestige, salary, stability
of employment, ambition and morale.
Growth is a trade-off between these benefits and the costs of the expansion.
Constraints on growth
Availability of finance
Effect on the share price if cash is diverted from dividends
Lack of management experience
Limited time to prepare the workforce and management for changes
Government policy on monopoly power and mergers
External growth involves buying existing facilities through takeover or merger. Advantages:
an easier and quicker method of growth, especially if wish to expand geographically
the opportunity to acquire assets or experience
the opportunity to share the financial burden and the risk of a project
the opportunity of a good use of spare cash for a mature company.
An approach will first be made to the target’s board, who agree or fight the offer. If the
takeover is agreed it is recommended to the target shareholders. If not the offer is dropped
or taken directly to the target’s shareholders; a hostile takeover.
Management Buyouts (MBOs) are where some capital comes from the existing management
team. Together with fresh debt finance it is used to buy out the company.
Explain how the directors should go about interpreting the results of this simulation before
making a final decision on the project. [5]
As the investment opportunity is very complicated, its modelling is also likely to be very complex.
The directors should ensure they are happy that the model results are reliable. [1]
They should investigate the distribution of the net present values, looking at the size of both
positive and negative outcomes. [1]
In particular, the results in the 15% of cases that the net present value is negative should be
studied closely to identify any significant downside risks to be considered. [1]
If the losses were sufficiently large to potentially bankrupt the company, the downside risk of
investing in the project may be unacceptably high even with the 85% probability of success. [1]
The anticipated income from the project should be taken into account. If the likely NPV is a small
positive then that might not be sufficient to justify the 15% possibility of a loss. [1]
The directors should also consider other methods of evaluating the project. For example, they
may look at a shareholder value analysis or internal rate of return. [1]
[Maximum 5]
Chapter 22 Summary
Calculating the required rate of return for a project
The use of the cost of capital to calculate the net present value in screening projects ensures
that projects are only entered into that will enhance the return to shareholders, provided
that it is adjusted to reflect the project risk.
Systematic risk is that part of the return on a project that cannot be eliminated by investing
in the same type of project many times over, nor by diversification.
If the systematic risk for a particular project is thought to be higher/lower than is usual for a
company’s projects, then in theory the discount rate used should be greater/lower than that
which the company normally employs.
Certainty equivalents can be used to replace the individual risky projected cashflows and
then discounted at a uniform rate of return.
Identification
A risk matrix can be used to systematically identify risks categorised according to the cause
of risk and the stage of the project.
The stages of a project include promotion of concept, design, contract negotiations, project
approval, raising of capital, construction, operation and maintenance, receiving revenues
and decommissioning.
Mitigation