Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01777-2

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

L‑Histidine immobilized montmorillonite for As(III) adsorption

and statistical verification of data by PDF, AICcorrected and AADR
models
Aneeqa Batool1 · Khizar Hussain Shah1 · Sajid Hussain1 · Zakir Hussain2 · Syed Ali Raza Naqvi3 · Tauqir A. Sherazi1 

Received: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022

© The Author(s) 2022

Abstract
L-Histidine immobilized montmorillonite is prepared and used as an adsorbent for removal of As(III) from aqueous solutions.
The L-Histidine immobilized montmorillonite is characterized by FTIR, XRD, TGA and PZC techniques that confirmed the
successful insertion of Histidine into interlayer of montmorillonite structure. The various parameters such as pH, reaction
time, temperature, concentration of As(III) and adsorbent dosage are optimized to obtain maximum As(III) adsorption. It
is observed that usually the removal of As(III) is increased with increasing the amount of adsorbent, contact time, tempera-
ture and till pH 6. The results showed that all these adsorption parameters greatly influenced the adsorption process. The
various adsorption isotherm models including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin-Radishkevich (DR) as well as
kinetics models are applied to the adsorption data. The Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second order kinetics model are
well-fitted to the adsorption data. Further, the probability distribution function (PDF) is applied that verified the adsorp-
tion data well while the Akaike’s Information Criterion (­ AICcorrected) and Absolute Average Relative Deviation (AARD)
statistical models supported the best fit adsorption isotherms. The PDF model have provided a good statistical identification
of adsorption parameters, adsorption rates and maxima whereas ­AICcorrected and AARD models revealed the well-fitting of
Langmuir adsorption isotherm model in correlating the equilibrium data. Thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG) proved
the endothermic and spontaneous nature of adsorption process along with entropical changes occurring at solid-solution
interface. The results showed that L-Histidine immobilized montmorillonite is an excellent material for As(III) adsorption
with maximum adsorption capacity of 87.7 mg ­g−1.

Keywords  Montmorillonite · L-Histidine · As (III) · Adsorption isotherm · Kinetic models · Probability distribution
function

Introduction these oxidation states, arsenic has been detected in As(III)

and As(V) stable oxidation states (Bessaies et al. 2020).
Arsenic is naturally occurring in earth crust as well as in These both forms of Arsenic are toxic but As(III) is com-
underground and surface water due to natural weathering paratively sixty times more toxic than As(V) (Mohan and
and anthropogenic activities (Martinson and Reddy 2009). Pittman Jr 2007, Singh et al. 2015). The permissible level
It exists in various oxidation forms (− 3, 0, + 3, + 5). From of As(III) in drinking water is 5 × ­10–5 to 1 × ­10–5 g.L−1
according to recommendation of World Health Organization
(WHO) (Basha, Selvi et al. 2009). The presence of As(III)
* Tauqir A. Sherazi above this limit causes serious health issues like skin and
[email protected]
lung cancers, anemia, keratosis, hyperpigmentation, liver
1
Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad, fibroses and neurological disorders (Mondal et al. 2020).
Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan The number of methods available for removal of As(III)
2
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University from water and waste water solutions which include reverse
Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan osmosis, chemical coagulation, chemical precipitation, elec-
3
Department of Chemistry, Government College University, trochemical methods, membrane filtration, ion exchange
Faisalabad, Pakistan process (Arahman et al. 2018, Khan, Sherazi et al. 2018,

13
Vol.:(0123456789)
 258   Page 2 of 13 Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

Sherazi et al. 2022). Among all the above described tech- Material and reagents
niques, adsorption is more efficient and ideal technique for
removal of As(III) from aqueous solution. A number of In this work, all chemicals used were of high purity ana-
adsorbents have been practically used for the removal of lytical grade and used without any further purification.
As(III) which include nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, oxide Na-Montmorillonite (Na-MMt), Arsenic trioxide (­ As2O3),
and hydroxide nanoparticles and biomasses ion exchange Potassium Iodide (KI), Potassium Iodate ­(KIO3), Hydro-
resins (Razzaq, Shah et al. 2020). The use of these adsor- chloric acid (HCl), Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), Sodium
bents for the removal of As(III) from aqueous solution is Chloride (NaCl), L-Histidine (­ C6H9N3O2) and Methylene
not economical and feasible and also degradation of these Blue ­(C16H18CIN3S) of analytical grade were purchased
adsorbents produces a large amount of sludge and secondary from Daejung, South Korea. All the experiments were car-
pollutants in water. ried out using ultrapure distilled water. The standard stock
The selection of natural clays, minerals and rocks such as solution of As(ΙΙΙ) was prepared by dissolving 1.320 g of
bentonite, montmorillonite, kaolin, zeolite, calcite, dolomite ­As2O3 in 20 mL of 1 M NaOH. In this solution, 50 mL
and diatomite as adsorbents can be considered a best option of 0.5  M HCl solution was added and the volume was
due to several advantages of high thermal stability, wide adjusted to 1000 mL by deionized water. The working
availability and excellent adsorption potential, low cost and solutions of different concentration of As(ΙΙΙ) were pre-
green nature (Jiang et al. 2002). In addition, the surface and pared by dilution of stock solution. The solutions of HCl
adsorption characteristics of these adsorbents can be eas- (1 M), NaOH(1 M), 2%KI and 2% ­KIO3 were prepared.
ily modified using different surface modifying agents (Zhu The 1 mg/L solution of methylene blue was prepared by
et al. 2017). dissolving 1  mg of methylene blue in 1L of deionized
The area of interest in current study was to improve the water.
absorption properties of Montmorillonite clay by using sur-
face modifier L-Histidine, a biological material. Recently,
Tyrosine immobilized montmorillonite was employed as Arsenic (ΙΙΙ) determination
an adsorbent for removal of inorganic metal ions, ­Pb2+
and ­Cu2+ and results proved an excellent performance of A series of standard solutions containing 1–10 mg ­L−1 of
adsorbent for metal ion decontamination. (Chu et al. 2019). As(III) were poured into a series of 50 mL calibrated flask
Similarly, L-Cysteine modified montmorillonite alginate then 4 mL of 1 mg/L methylene blue were added having
nanocomposite was used as an adsorbent for the removal of solution pH was 4. After that 2 mL of 2% KI and mL of
­Ni2+, ­Pb2+ and C ­ u2+ and satisfactory results were reported 2% ­KIO3 were added respectively and shaken slowly. The
(Mittal et al. 2016). absorbance of solution was measured at λ max of 353 nm
L-Histidine is a type of basic amino acid having positive using UV–Visible spectrophotometer as reported in lit-
charge under weekly acidic conditions which can easily form erature (Shah, Fahad et al. 2021).
complex with metal ions due to good chelating capability
(Palit and Moulik 2001, Bakatula, Cukrowska et al. 2014).
The surface modification of montmorillonite with L-His- Adsorption experiment
tidine can result in synthesis of an ideal and economical
adsorbent with improved adsorption properties for decon- The adsorption parameters were studied by applying dif-
tamination of many cationic pollutants in water bodies. The ferent experimental conditions to find out the optimum
current study, thus investigates the L-Histidine immobilized range for excellent adsorption efficiency of adsorbent. For
montmorillonite (His-MMt) adsorbent for the removal of kinetic study, 10 mg of His-MMt adsorbent was added in
As(ΙΙΙ) from aqueous solution and it is necessary to mention 100 mL of 1 mg.L −1 As(III) solution. The samples for
that it is the first report regarding its surface and adsorption determination of As(III) were collected after different time
characteristics for As(ΙΙΙ) removal. In addition, the objective intervals of reaction and analyzed by analytical method
of the current investigation is also to evaluate the adsorption described above using UV–Visible spectrometer. The
data and suitability of different adsorption isotherm models effect of pH on adsorption of As(III) was analyzed at dif-
using different statistical models like probability distribution ferent pH values (2–12) consistently using 1 mg/L initial
function (PDF), Akaike’s information criterion (­ AICcorrected) concentration. For equilibrium study, 10 mg of His-MMt
and Arithmetic Average Relative Deviation (AARD). The was added to 30 mL of As(III) solutions having different
statistical approach for evaluation of adsorption data and initial concentrations ranging from 10 to 90 mg.L−1. The
well-fitting of adsorption isotherm models is mandatory to sample solutions were stirred by giving 30 min contact
identify the As (III) adsorption plateau and maxima, adsorp- time at 298 K to obtain adsorption equilibrium. In order
tion rates and mechanism.

13
Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258 Page 3 of 13  258

to investigate the effect of temperature on adsorption pro- (

SSE
)
AIC = N ln + 2K (7)
cess, reaction was performed over the temperature range N
of 298–313 K. To analyze the effect of dosage amount,
where SSE can be calculated by the relation
different weights of adsorbents ranging from 10 to 30 mg
were mixed with mg.L−1 of As(III) solution. ∑( )2
SSE = qe − qt (8)
The percentage removal (%) and amount adsorbed per
unit mass (mg ­g−1.) of As(III) was evaluated by following
equation.
Ci − Ce Characterization techniques
%Removal = × 100 (1)
Ci
The Na-MMt modified by L-Histidine was characterized
( ) by using different characterization techniques. The modi-
X = Ci − Ce × V (2) fication of Na -montmorillonite was confirmed by Fourier
Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of the sample recorded
where ­Ci and ­Ce are initial and equilibrium concentration of
by SCHIMADZU 8202PC model in the wavenumber
As(III) solution (mg.L−1), respectively. V is volume of solu-
range 4000–400  ­cm−1. Further the replacement of Na by
tion in L and X is adsorption capacity in mg/L.
L-Histidine was confirmed by XRD for XRD patterns by
using Philips 1700 series X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα
Statistical Evaluation of adsorption data radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm) operating at 40 kV voltage and
and adsorption isotherm models 40 mA current. The thermal stability of both unmodified and
modified adsorbent was checked Thermogravimetric analy-
To verify the adsorption process statistically, a relation of sis (TGA) and point of zero charge (PZC) was determined
Probability distribution function (PDF) was used in the form by well-known salt addition method reported in literature
(Shah, Fahad et al. 2021). For this purpose, solutions of
dF 0.1 M NaCl (40 mL) were prepared and their initial pH (­ pHi)
f (x) = (3)
dx values were adjusted in the pH range of 2–12 using 0.01 M
HCl or NaOH. In these adjusted pH solutions, 10 mg of
where the f(x) represents the Probability distribution func-
adsorbent was poured and suspensions were stirred for 24 h.
tion (PDF) and dF indicates the cumulative distribution
Then after stirring, final pH ­(pHf) of solution was measured
function CDF and the differential of (CDF) is equals to the
and a graph was plotted between ­pHi and ΔpH and PZC was
PDF.
determined from the point of intersection where ΔpH = 0.
x

∫−∞ (4)
f (x)dx = F(x)
Preparation of adsorbent
To verify the well-fitting of adsorption isotherm models,
a statistical model known as absolute average relative devia- Montmorillonite was first converted into its sodium form
tion percentage (AARD) was used which can be described as by treating montmorillonite with 1  M NaCl. In 20  g of
N montmorillonite, 1 M NaCl was added and stirred for 24 h.
1 ∑ ||qe − qt || After treating with NaCl the sample was washed for sev-
AARD = (5)
N i=1 qe eral times to remove excess ions. The sample was dialyzed
by using dialysis membrane with deionized water until it
where N is no of data points, ­qe and ­qt are experimental
becomes free from extra ­Na+ and C ­ l− ions. The sample was
and theoretical values of adsorption capacity (mg/g) respec-
then dried at 80 °C for 24 h. The Na-MMt was grinded with
tively. Similarly, another statistical model known as Akaike’s
mortar and pestle and then passed through 250 μm sieve to
information criterion ­(AICCorrected) was used for verification
collect fine Na-MMt particles. After that 20 g of Na-MMt
of most suitable fitted adsorption isotherm which can be
was added in 1000 mL of deionized water and then 0.05 g of
presented as
L-Histidine was added keeping pH of solution in the range
2K(K + 1) of 4–5. The mixture was agitated at 300 rpm for 24 h to
AICcorrected = AIC + (6) immobilize L-Histidine on the surface of Na-MMt solid sup-
N−K−1
port and then filtered. Then His-MMt was dried in oven for
where K is the number of parameters, while N is number of 24 h and grounded by passing through 200 mesh sieves and
data points. AIC can be evaluated by error sum of squares stored for performing adsorption experiments.
by using following equations

13
 258   Page 4 of 13 Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

Results and discussions
3619
Determination of point of charge (PZC) 1653

Tranmittance (%)
PZC is a point where net surface charge of the adsorbent
becomes to zero, and it can provide the possible mecha- 1020

nism for the interaction between adsorbent and adsorbate. 1426

3640 1652 1138
The ­pHpzc values of 6 and 9 were obtained for Na-MMt 3382
and His-MMt respectively as shown in Fig. 1.
1018

FTIR results 3620 1635 1122

999
The FTIR Results of Na-MMt, His-MMt and after adsorp-
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
tion of As (ΙΙΙ) by His-MMt are shown in Fig.  2. The
-1
results indicated that Na-MMt and His-MMt showed Wavenumber (cm )
broad O–H stretching vibration at 3620 and 3640 ­cm−1,
respectively. The peak at 1635 ­cm−1 is due bending vibra- Fig. 2  FTIR spectra of Na-MMt and His-MMt before and after As
(III) adsorption
tion of interlayer water or structural water in Na-MMt.
The peaks at 1122 and 999 ­cm−1, were caused by inside
and outside plane stretching vibration of Si–O bonds. In SEM analysis
L-His-MMt, these corresponding peaks shifted to 1652,
1138 and 1018 ­c m −1. The bands observed at 3382 and The SEM results of Na-MMt and His-MMt are shown in
1424 ­cm−1 were assigned as N–H stretching vibration and Fig. 3. Lamellar structures of both Na-MMt and His-MMT
imidazole ring stretching vibration of L-Histidine respec- were displayed. After adding of L-Histidine, the original
tively. These results showed that L-Histidine has been lamellar structure of montmorillonite is not distorted, which
successfully inserted into inter-layers of Na-MMt. When confirmed that there was no exfoliation of the montmoril-
His-MMt adsorbed As (ΙΙΙ), the corresponding peaks lonite and the layered assembly of montmorillonite was pro-
shifted to 3619, 1653 and 1020 ­c m −1 while 3382 ­c m −1 tected in the whole process of modification. It also indicated
disappeared indicating that interaction of His-MMt with that His-MMt has better dispersity and a more regular struc-
As (ΙΙΙ) occurred via surface complexation reaction (Chu ture than Na-Montmorillonite.
et al. 2020).
TGA results

The TGA graph for thermal stability of Na-MMt and His-

5
His-MMt MMt is shown in Fig. 4. The results showed that His-MMt
Na-MMt has a bigger weight loss as compared to Na-MMt. The curve
4
of Na-MMt is composed of two regions. First region comes
3 from 104 to 160 °C, where percentage loss is about 1.8%
which may be due to the loss of physical or structural water
2 and second region comes from 450 to 720 °C, where per-
centage loss is about 7.5% which may be due to the dehy-
∆pH

1 droxylation of montmorillonite. For His-MMt curve, per-

centage weight loss is 2% in range of 90–125 °C, which
0 may be due the evaporation of water and thermal degrada-
tion of L-Histidine. The second weight loss is 8.1% in the
-1 range of 450–712 °C which is due to break down of amino
acid molecules (Chu et al. 2020). The comparative analysis
-2 of Na-MMt and His-MMt curves showed that the stabil-
4 6 8 10 12
ity in material before and after modification was controlled
pHi by layered structure of montmorillonite. By incorporating
L-Histidine into the layered structure of montmorillonite,
Fig. 1  PZC of Na-MMt and His-MMt the stability of montmorillonite was maintained.

13
Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258 Page 5 of 13  258

Fig. 3  SEM images of a Na-MMt b His-MMt

1.8% Na-MMt Na-MMt

98 His-MMt His-MMt
4% As3+-His-MMt c
96
7.5% a
b d
Weight (%)

94
Intensity

6.8%

92

90

88

86
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Temperature °C 10 20 30 40 50 60
2θ
θ
Fig. 4  TGA of Na-MMt and His-MMt
Fig. 5  XRD patterns of Na-MMt and His-MMt before and after
adsorption of As(III) on
XRD results

The results for XRD analysis are shown in Fig. 5. The d removal (85.5%) of As (III) was achieved within 30 min
spacing value of Na-MMt was calculated as 2.26 nm nm at of equilibrium time. Beyond 30 min, further no increase in
a diffraction peak 2θ = 12.57°. The value of d. spacing was removal efficiency was observed indicating the saturation
increased from 2.26 to 3.36 nm which showed that L-His- of surface active site of adsorbent after 30 min. Therefore,
tidine was successfully inserted into the interlayer of Na- 30 min contact time was optimized for further adsorption
MMt structure. After adsorption of As(III) on His-MMt, experiments.
new peaks appeared at 2θ = 19.94°, 28.23°, 9.08° showing The PDF model also statistically verified the kinetic curve
metal ions interaction with L-Histidine montmorillonite. and 30 min contact time for maximum uptake as shown in
Fig. 6b. Once the plateau phase was achieved at 30 min,
Effect of time As(III) adsorption did not alter significantly with time and,
hence, this PDF could be used for class statistical compari-
The results for the influence of contact time on adsorp- sons of As(III) adsorption rate and adsorption maxima.
tion process are shown in Fig. 6a which showed that per- To evaluate the kinetic data of As(III) removal by using
centage removal of As(III) onto His-MMt was increased L-Histidine Montmorillonite adsorbent, various kinetic
with increasing contact time and maximum percentage models such as pseudo-first order and pseudo second order

13
 258   Page 6 of 13 Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

Fig. 6  a Effect of contact time on removal of As(ΙΙΙ) by His-MMt b PDF verification of kinetic curve

were used. The linearized form of pseudo first order kinetic charged while above pH 9 was negatively charged. It can
model is given as: be observed from the figure that the percentage removal of
( ) As(III) was less at pH < 2 which can be explained by the
ln qe − qt = ln qe − ke ln t (9) fact that in highly acidic conditions, most abundant species
of As(III) solution are neutral H ­ 3AsO3 species and their
­ in−1,
here ­k1 is the first order rate constant having unit m
adsorption ability is generally low. Because ­H+ ions and
­qe is adsorption capacity at equilibrium (mg/g), qt is the
­H2O molecules are preferred by the surface of adsorbent for
adsorption capacity at time t (mg.g−1). Similarly, linearized
adsorption (Shah, Fahad et al. 2021). When the pH of As(III)
form of pseudo second order kinetic model can be written as:
solution was increased the ­OH− ions combine with H ­ + ions
( )
t 1 1 of Arsenite species ­H3AsO3 and resultant anionic species in
= 2 2+ t (10) As(III) solution appeared as H ­ 2AsO3−, ­HAsO3−2, ­AsO3−3.
qe K qe qe
Below pH 9, the positively charged surface of adsorbent
here ­qt and q­ e have the same meanings as described above adsorbs anionic species such as ­H2AsO3−, ­HAsO3−2 and
and ­k2 is the second order rate constant. The results of these ­AsO3−3. At pH greater than 9, the most dominant species of
plots are shown in Fig. 7a, b showing the higher value of Ar(III) solution are ­AsO3−3 and, negatively charged surface
regression coefficient (R2 = 0.999) for pseudo-second order of adsorbent repels anionic species A ­ sO3−. Therefore, the
model as compared to pseudo-first order model. This corre- adsorption of As(III) was decreased at higher pH greater
sponds to well-fitting of pseudo second order kinetics model. than PZC. The possible binding mechanism can be pro-
Moreover, the Fig. 7c, d also show the well-fitting of intra- posed as surface complexation where As(III) ions stabilize
particle diffusion model as compared to film diffusion with on adsorbent surface through electrostatic force of attraction
higher value of regression coefficient (R2 = 0.995). All the and hydrogen bonding. The probability of As(III) uptake by
kinetic parameters and regression coefficient values calcu- the adsorbent also increases with increase of pH from pH 2
lated from kinetic models are listed in Table 1. to 6, the maximum probability of As(III) uptake was found
at pH 6 as shown in Fig. 8b. Thus PDF model provided a
Effect of pH unique statistical approach for evaluation of adsorption data
by providing a good fit for As(III) removal under the influ-
The adsorption of As (III) by His-MMt was strongly affected ence of different pH values of solution.
by pH of the solution. The results are shown in Fig. 8a which
showed that adsorption efficiency of adsorbent was increased Effect of dosage of adsorbent
with increasing pH of solution and maximum adsorption was
occurred at pH 6. As discussed earlier, the PZC of adsorbent The dosage of adsorbent highly effected the removal of
was determined at pH 9, where net surface charge of adsor- As(III) from aqueous solution as shown in Fig.  9a. The
bent was zero, below pH 9 adsorbent surface was positively results demonstrated that removal efficiency of As(III) was

13
Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258 Page 7 of 13  258

Fig. 7  Kinetic models a Pseudo first order plot, b Pseudo second order plot, c Film diffusion model and d Intra-particle diffusion plots for As
(III) adsorption

Table 1  Parameters of kinetic models This may be due of availability of more active sites and
Kinetic models Parameters Values
surface area of adsorbent for mass transfer. However, beyond
30 mg of adsorbent, no further increase in removal efficiency
Pseudo first order qe.cal (μg/g) 9689.51 was observed. This might be attributed to the aggregation or
K1 0.10126 intersection of the absorbent particles and decrease the effec-
Pseudo second order K2 ­(min−1) 9664.07 tive surface area of adsorbent when the amount of adsorbent
qe.cal (μg/g) 0.0000144 was increased (Shah, Fahad et al. 2021). The probability of
Film diffusion Kf ­(min−1) 0.1004 uptake of As(III) from adsorbent was also increases with
Intraparticle Diffusion kp (mg/g) 605.7 increase of amount of adsorbent up to a certain range i.e.
maximum when amount of adsorbent was 20 mg as shown
in Fig. 9b
increased linearly with the increase of amount of adsorbent
and maximum percentage removal of 93% achieved with Effect of temperature and thermodynamic
optimum dose of 30 mg of adsorbent. From the results it can investigation
be observed that considerable increase in uptake of As(III)
occurred when the amount of adsorbent was increased from The effect of temperature on adsorption of As(III) by the
10 to 20 mg. adsorbent studied and results are shown in Fig. 10a. The

13
 258   Page 8 of 13 Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

Fig. 8  a Effect of pH on the removal of As (III) by His-MMt b PDF of pH study

Fig. 9  Effect of His-MMt dosage on the percentage removal of As (III)

percentage removal of As(III) onto the adsorbent was the well fitness of PDF statistical model to the available
increased with temperature because increasing tempera- experimental adsorption data. It can observe from the Fig-
ture provide sufficient amount of kinetic energy to As(III) ures, Fig. 10a, b that the shapes of PDF and experimental
ions to undergo an interaction with active site at the sur- adsorption curve are statistically equivalent. This clearly
face of adsorbent. It can also be inferred from the results indicates the robustness of PDF model for the evalua-
in figure that percent removal is higher in the range of tion of adsorption data. The thermodynamics parameters
temperature 298-308 K and there is a linear increase in including Gibbs free energy (ΔG), enthalpy (ΔH) and
As(III) adsorption. However, after 308 K, the rate of per- entropy (ΔS) observed and the computed values for all
centage removal was low and there is a gradual increase thermodynamic parameters are presented in Table 1. The
in adsorption was observed.  After 318  K, the adsorp- values of ΔH and ΔS were determined from the slope and
tion curve became almost parallel to the x-axis and ulti- intercept of Vant Holf plot while ΔG was calculated from
mately reached at the stage of boundary adsorption due to Gibbs free energy. The relationship of ΔG, ΔH and ΔS can
saturation of adsorption active sites. Figure 10b presents be provided by the following equation:

13
Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258 Page 9 of 13  258

Fig. 10  a Effect of temperature on the percentage removal of As (III) by His-MMt b PDF of Temperature study c Van’t Hoff plot at 25 °C

ΔH ΔS Table 2  Values of thermodynamic parameters for As(III) adsorption

ln Kc = − (11) by His-Mt
RT R
Temperature ΔG kJ/mol ΔH kJ/mol ΔS J/mol/K
where Kc is the equilibrium constant. The values of ΔH, (K)
ΔS and ΔG (Table 1) were obtained by using the following
equation: 298  − 6.366 59.34 213.83
303  − 6.473
ΔG = ΔH − TΔS (12) 308  − 6.580
313  − 6.686
Table 2 shows that the values of ΔG at all temperatures 318  − 6.793
are negative and hence showed the favorable and spontane-
ous nature of adsorption reaction, while the positive ΔH
and ΔS values shows the endothermic nature of adsorption
Effect of concentration
process and increase of overall randomness of the system,
respectively. Parameters of different adsorption isotherm
The effect of initial metal ions concentration on the
models are listed in Table 3.
adsorption efficiency of As (III) onto His-MMt is investi-
gated in detail and it is concluded that with the increase in
concentration of metal ions, the adsorption capacity is also

13
 258   Page 10 of 13 Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

( )
Table 3  Parameters of different adsorption isotherm models Ce 1 1
= Cm + (13)
Adsorption Isotherms Parameters Values X qm KL qm
Langmuir Isotherm Qm (mg/g−1) 87.71 here ­Ce is concentration at equilibrium (mg.g−1), X is quan-
KL 0.0771 tity of adsorbate adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent (mg.
Freundlich Isotherm KF 9.506 g−1), ­qm is maximum adsorption capability of adsorbent
N 0.6029
(mg/g) and K ­ L is Langmuir constant for determination of
Temkin Isotherm BT (J/mol−1) 123.3@
AT (L/mg−1) 2.356 maximum energy of adsorption. The equation for Freundlich
DR-Model Q 50.28 adsorption isotherm is given as;
β(KJ/mol−1) 14 1
ln qe = ln KF + ln Ce (14)
n
increased (Fig. 11a). It can be predicted from figure that here ­Ce is concentration at equilibrium, q­ e is amount of
initially, the percentage removal of As (III) is increased adsorbate per unit mass of adsorbent (mg.g−1), ­KF is adsorp-
by the adsorbent and after a certain limit, an equilibrium tion capacity and 1/n is heterogeneity factor showing adsorp-
established and no further increase in the percentage tion intensity.
removal of As (III) is observed. The reason is saturation The equation for Temkin isotherm can be expressed in
of the available active sites of the adsorbent. The equilib- the form;
rium study data is verified well through PDF as shown in
RT RT
Fig. 11b qe = ln At C (15)
In order to understand the adsorption mechanism differ- bt bt e
ent adoption isotherms models are applied on equilibrium here ­At (L.mg−1) is Temkin isotherm constant while b­ t
study data such as Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich iso- (K.mol−1) constant related to heat of adsorption.
therm, Temkin isotherm and Dubinin-Radishkevich (D-R) To understand whether the adsorption was physical or
isotherms as shown in Fig. 12a-d. It can be observed that chemical, the mean free energy (E) from D-R isotherm
Langmuir model is best applicable to the equilibrium data was calculated, which can be expressed with the following
due to higher regression-coefficient (R 2 = 0.9999). The equation:
maximum percentage removal of As (III) ions is observed
as 87% by the adsorbent when the concentration of As(III) ln X = ln Xm − 𝛽𝜀2 (16)
solution was 200 ppm. The equation for Langmuir adsorp-
tion isotherm is given as; In Eq. (3), ε is Polanyi adsorption potential and is equal
to:

Fig. 11  a Effect of Concentration on adsorption process by His-MMt b PDF of concentration study

13
Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258 Page 11 of 13  258

Fig. 12  a Plot of Langmuir adsorption isotherm, b Pot of Freundlich adsorption isotherm, c Plot of D-R model, d Temkin isotherm model

{ }
1 Statistical evaluation of adsorption isotherm by AIC
𝜀 = RT 1 + (17) corrected and AARD
ce

The relationship of ε2 to lnX is shown in the form of The different adsorption isotherms were evaluated by
a plot following Dubinin-Radishkevich isotherm model in Akaike information criterion ­A IC corrected and absolute
Fig. 12d. The value of free energy determines whether the average relative distribution (AARD) as shown in Fig. 13a,
process is physical or chemical adsorption which is related b. Based on overall results of ­AICcorrected and AARD the
to the value of β ­(mol2.J−2) as shown by the following correlating ability of various isotherms found to be in
relationship: ascending order as; Langmuir isotherm, DR model, Fre-
undlich isotherm and Temkin isotherm respectively. Here
1
E= (18) the order of correlating ability for A
­ ICcorrected and AARD
(2𝛽)1∕2 matches exactly.
The adsorption energy E (kJ.mol−1) calculated by D-R The ­AICcorrected value for Langmuir adsorption isotherm
model is 14 kJ.mol−1 which demonstrated the involvement of was found as 3.19, while AARD value for Langmuir adsorp-
electrostatic force of attraction for the surface complexation tion isotherm was found as 0.0368. It is cleared from the
reaction. between adsorbate ions and adsorbent (Behdani Fig. 13 that for Langmuir adsorption isotherm ­AICcorrected
et al. 2013). and AARD has least value, which demonstrated that this
model is best fitted than other adsorption isotherm models

13
 258   Page 12 of 13 Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258

Fig. 13  a ­AICcorrected b AARD for different isotherm models

applied in current equilibrium data (Rajahmundry et al. kinetic models were observed as the best fit to the adsorption
2021). data with high regression co-efficient values. A maximum
The different materials used in literature for the removal As(III) adsorption capacity of His-MMt calculated through
of As(III) from water and the maximum adsorption capacity Langmuir isotherm is found to be 87.7 mg.g−1 that is much
is shown in Table 4. The following comparison have shown higher compare to several others adsorbents reported in lit-
that L-Histidine immobilized montmorillonite used in cur- erature. The thermodynamic investigation confirmed the
rent investigation has high adsorption capacity as compared endothermic and spontaneous nature of adsorption process
to other adsorbent materials. with increasing entropy at solid-solution interface. The prob-
ability distribution function (PDF) also validated the experi-
mental adsorption data statistically and thus recommended
Conclusions to be used for the verification of data in similar adsorption
studies. The lowest values of A ­ ICcorrected and AARD sta-
The L-Histidine is successfully immobilized onto mont- tistical models for Langmuir isotherm as compare to other
morillonite surface and this modified montmorillonite isotherm applied to experimental equilibrium data represents
is explored in detail for its adsorption efficiency towards that the adsorption phenomenon of His-MMt is best fit to
As(III). The maximum adsorption of 96% was obtained for the Langmuir isotherm The results showed that L-Histidine
As(III) following optimum experimental conditions that are immobilized montmorillonite was an excellent adsorbent
pH 6,20 mg.L−1 initial concentration, 20 mg of adsorbent material for As(III) adsorption. Moreover, the statistical
dosage, and for a contact time of 30 min at 318 K. Both models such as PDF, A ­ ICcorrected and AARD are very useful
Langmuir adsorption isotherm and pseudo-second order in verification of experimental data in adsorption studies.

Table 4  Comparison of L-Histidine immobilized montmorillonite with different clay based adsorbents for As(III) removal
Sr. No Adsorbents Maximum adsorption capac- References
ity ­qm (mg ­g−1)

1 Hydroxyapatite bentonite clay nanocrystalline cellulose 51.01 (Hokkanen et al. 2019)

2 Sodium montmorillonite 9.71 (Zehhaf et al. 2015)
3 Iron oxide coated sand 0.14 (Vaishya and Gupta 2003)
4 Co-bentonite with MgO and poly (dimethyldiallylammonium) 9.99 (Hua 2018)
6 Al/Fe modified monttmorillonite 3.854 (Almasri et al. 2018)
7 Iron coated sand 0.0285 (Gupta et al. 2005)
8 L-Histidine immobilized Montmorillonite 87.7 This study

13
Applied Water Science (2022) 12:258 Page 13 of 13  258

Acknowledgements  Not applicable cellulose. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 38:13147. https://​doi.​
org/​10.​1002/​ep.​13147
Funding  The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Hua J (2018) Adsorption of low-concentration arsenic from water by
Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (20–3684/R&D/HEC/14), co-modified bentonite with manganese oxides and poly (dime-
(8817/Balochistan/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2017) and Pakistan Science thyldiallylammonium chloride). J Environ Chem Eng 6:156–168.
Foundation (PSF/NSFC-Eng/KP-COMSATS-ABT-04) that helped to https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jece.​2017.​11.​062
conduct the experimental work reported in this article. Jiang JQ, Cooper C, Ouk S (2002) Comparison of modified montmoril-
lonite adsorbents: part I: preparation, characterization and phenol
Declarations  adsorption. Chemosphere 47:711–716. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​
S0045-​6535(02)​00011-5
Conflict of interest  The authors declare no competing financial inter- Khan A, Sherazi TA, Khan Y et al (2018) Fabrication and charac-
est. terization of polysulfone/modified nanocarbon black composite
antifouling ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 554:71–82
Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- Martinson CA, Reddy KJ (2009) Adsorption of arsenic (III) and arse-
bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- nic (V) by cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long 336:406–411
as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, Mittal A, Ahmad R, Hasan I (2016) Biosorption of Pb2+, Ni2+ and
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes Cu2+ ions from aqueous solutions by L-cystein-modified mont-
were made. The images or other third party material in this article are morillonite-immobilized alginate nanocomposite. Desalin Water
included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated Treat 57:17790–17807
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr (2007) Arsenic removal from water/wastewa-
the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not ter using adsorbents—a critical review. J Hazard Mater 142:1–53.
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jhazm​at.​2007.​01.​006
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a Mondal M, Manoli K, Ray AK (2020) Removal of arsenic (III) from
copy of this licence, visit http://​creat​iveco​mmons.​org/​licen​ses/​by/4.​0/. aqueous solution by concrete-based adsorbents. Can J Chem Eng
98:353–359. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cjce.​23589
Palit D, Moulik SP (2001) Adsorption behaviors of L-histidine and DL-
tryptophan on cholesterol, silica, alumina, and graphite. J Colloid
References Interface Sci 239:20–26. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1006/​jcis.​2001.​7523
Rajahmundry GK, Garlapati C, Kumar PS et al (2021) Statistical analy-
Almasri DA, Rhadfi T, Atieh MA et  al (2018) High performance sis of adsorption isotherm models and its appropriate selection.
hydroxyiron modified montmorillonite nanoclay adsorbent for Chemosphere 276:130176. https://d​ oi.o​ rg/1​ 0.1​ 016/j.c​ hemos​ phere.​
arsenite removal. Chem Eng 335:1–12. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​ 2021.​130176
cej.​2017.​10.​031 Razzaq R et al (2020) Adsorption potential of macroporous Amber-
Arahman N, Maimun T, Bilad M (2018) Fabrication of polyethersul- lyst-15 for Cd (II) removal from aqueous solutions. Mater Res
fone membranes using nanocarbon as additive. Int J GEOMATE Exp 7(2):025509
15:51–57 Shah KH, Fahad M, Ali S et al (2021) Potential of natural ferruginous
Bakatula E, Cukrowska WI et al (2014) Removal of toxic elements manganese (NFM) ore as a natural adsorbent for As (III) removal
from aqueous solution using bentonite modified with L-histidine. at low concentration. Int J Environ Anal Chem 54:1–18
Water Sci Technol 70:2022–2030. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2166/​wst.​ Sherazi TA, Azam S, Shah SH et  al (2022) Zwitterionic analog
2014.​450 structured ultrafiltration membranes for high permeate flux and
Basha CA, Selvi SJ, Ramasamy E, Chellammal S (2009) Removal of improved anti-fouling performance. J Membr Sci 643:120060.
arsenic and sulphate from the copper smelting industrial effluent. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​memsci.​2021.​120060
Chem Eng Sci 141:89–98. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​cej.​2007.​10.​ Singh R, Singh S, Parihar P et al (2015) Arsenic contamination, conse-
027 quences and remediation techniques: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ
Behdani FN, Rafsanjani AT, Torab-Mostaedi M et al (2013) Adsorp- Saf 112:247–270. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​ecoenv.​2014.​10.​009
tion ability of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes towards Vaishya RC, Gupta SK (2003) Modelling arsenic (III) adsorption from
aqueous Ce (III) and Sm (III). Korean J Chem Eng 30:448–455 water by sulfate-modified iron oxide-coated sand (SMIOCS). J
Bessaies H, Iftekhar S, Doshi B et al (2020) Synthesis of novel adsor- Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:73–80. https://d​ oi.o​ rg/1​ 0.1​ 002/j​ ctb.​
bent by intercalation of biopolymer in LDH for the removal 745
of arsenic from synthetic and natural water. Res J Environ Sci Zehhaf A, Benyoucef A, Quijada C et al (2015) Algerian natural mont-
91:246–261. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jes.​2020.​01.​028 morillonites for arsenic (III) removal in aqueous solution. Int J
Chu Y, Zhu S, Wang F et al (2019) Tyrosine-immobilized montmoril- Environ Sci Technol 12:595–602
lonite: an efficient adsorbent for removal of Pb2+ and Cu2+ from Zhu L, Wang L, Xu Y (2017) Chitosan and surfactant co-modified
aqueous solution. J Chem Eng Data 64:3535–3546 montmorillonite: a multifunctional adsorbent for contaminant
Chu Y, Khan MA, Xia M et al (2020) Synthesis and micro-mecha- removal. Appl Clay Sci 146:35–42. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​
nistic studies of histidine modified montmorillonite for lead (II) clay.​2017.​05.​027
and copper (II) adsorption from wastewater. Chem Eng Res Des
157:142–152. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​cherd.​2020.​02.​020 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
Gupta V, Saini V, Jain N (2005) Adsorption of As (III) from aque- jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ous solutions by iron oxide-coated sand. J Colloid Interface Sci
288:55–60. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jcis.​2005.​02.​054
Hokkanen S, Doshi B, Srivastava V et al (2019) Arsenic (III) removal
from water by hydroxyapatite-bentonite clay-nanocrystalline

13