Design Guide
Design Guide
Design Guide
16R8-250 Stirrups
(Each Rib)
Waco Engineering Services (WES) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Waco Africa Pty Ltd, a leading industrial services
company offering a diverse range of services. As a Temporary Works consulting business WES offers a full “risk
ringfenced” service to customers by covering the design and the on-site approval of temporary works.
WES works closely with its sister companies which include Form-Scaff, the market leading formwork and scaffolding
company and the exclusive distribution partner for Doka in Sub-Saharan Africa. Form-Scaff’s tried and tested Coffer
and Trough systems are unique, delivering two way and one way concrete slab spanning solutions.
By partnering with Form-Scaff, Waco Engineering Services can limit your risk exposure related to the equipment,
design and erection of temporary works. The benefits include:
1 REDUCED
RISK
Through WES and Form-Scaff you can reduce your risk and ensure you are compliant with the South African
Construction Regulation. WES is a Level 2 BBBEE contributor and has its own Professional Indemnity cover, over
and above the Waco Group’s comprehensive cover.
Disclaimer
Copyright in this Concrete Design Guide vests in Waco Engineering Services (“WES”), a subsidiary of Waco Africa (Proprietary) Limited and
extends inter alia, to the making of copies in whole or in part without the prior written consent of WES.
While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this Concrete Design Guide, neither WES or Mitchell & Associates
accept any responsibility for any errors which may occur as a result of the misappropriation or misinterpretation of the contents of this Concrete
Design Guide and are not liable for any loss of any nature whatsoever that may be incurred as a result of such misappropriation or
misinterpretation.
CONTENTS Coffers and Troughs
Page 35 PART 3 - Coffer slab design - ribs and structural topping (Steps 31 to 50)
Page 86 PART 3 - Trough slab design - ribs and structural topping (Steps 31 to 50)
The information given in this Concrete Design Guide regarding the design or the method of designing the reinforced concrete elements, may
change without prior notice.
GENERAL INFORMATION
coffers and troughs
Overview
This Concrete Design Guide provides guidance for the reinforced concrete design of Coffer and Trough slabs and only deals with the Coffer and
Trough sizes given in Table 1.
Pre-tensioning and post-tensioning options, in lieu of, or in combination with reinforcing steel, are excluded from this Concrete Design Guide.
National Building Regulations (NBR) and Building Standards Act No. 103 of 1977 (amended 2008)
The NBR forms the basis of how buildings in South Africa should be constructed and developed to suit human habitation and provides the law
relating to the erection of buildings in the areas of jurisdiction of local authorities.
SANS 10100-2 The structural use of concrete - Materials and execution of work
This standard establishes materials for concrete, proportioning, durability, reinforcing steel, formwork, placing and protection of concrete.
SANS 282 Bending dimensions and scheduling of steel reinforcement for concrete
This standard covers the bending dimensions, bar schedules and routine inspection of steel bars intended for use as reinforcement for concrete.
Note:
In addition to the SANS 10144, clauses 4.5.6 and 4.11.3 of the SANS 0100-1 must be taken into consideration when specifying the detailing
requirements for the reinforcing drawings.
ISO 9001.
OHSAS 18001.
Municipal bylaws.
International documentation – when Coffer and Trough systems are used outside of South Africa, the relevant international documentation must
be considered/adopted.
Any other normative references in the abovementioned SANS standards or other specifications or references not given in this Concrete Design
Guide.
02
INTRODUCTION Coffers and Troughs
Coffer slab
Concrete columns
Structural advantages
Coffers and Troughs provide the following structural advantages:
Improved concrete span to depth ratio.
Reduced amount and weight of concrete. Refer to Tables 3, 16 and 17 for the approximate displacement values.
Reduced amount of reinforcing steel.
Reduced column sizes.
Reduced foundation loading resulting in smaller foundations.
Concrete mass
The mass of reinforced concrete for Coffer and Trough slabs is assumed to be 25 kN/m3.
To compensate for the possibility of an excessive screed thickness being applied, the mass of the non-structural screed over the Coffer and Trough
slabs is also assumed to be 25 kN/m3.
The screed over the Coffers and Troughs (usually 50 mm thick), is non-structural and primarily used to level the top of the concrete slab.
An allowance for the self-weight of the screed over the Coffers and Trough slabs must be made when calculating the overall weight and deflection
of the concrete elements.
Shear
Where the beams intersect the columns, high localized forces occur and punching shear is the main cause for concern.
The shear resistance of beams must be in accordance with Clause 4.3.4 of the SANS 0100-1.
Deflection
Deflection at any point along the theoretical neutral axis of a structural element is the measured distance from the theoretical neutral axis to the final
position of the axis after loading and this measured distance must be within the allowed serviceability limit of the element.
The serviceability limit of each designed concrete element is to be in accordance with the specifications given in Clause 4.3.6 of the SANS 0100-1.
An allowance for the upward cambers of the slab and beams is recommended to compensate for the downward elastic deflections under self-weight
conditions.
05
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Step 1 Fill the complete slab with Coffers while leaving a beam around the perimeter of the floor slab
Step 2 Identify all the load bearing walls that are supported on top of the slab
Identify and determine the
Coffer support beam and slab
layout of the Coffer slab and Step 3 Identify the main columns and load bearing walls below the slab
support beams
Step 4 Check if any further support beams are required to create two-way spanning slabs
identification
Determine the self-weight Step 10 Determine the self-weight of the support beam
and imposed loads Step 11 Determine the imposed loading acting on the slab and support beam
Step 12 Determine the loads acting on the slab and support beam
Check the deflections for Step 26 Check the deflections based on the basic allowable span
the support beam Step 27 Calculate the actual long-term deflections
Step 28 Steel detailing of mid-span tension reinforcing steel for the support beams
Steel detailing of the Step 29 Steel detailing of the stirrups for the support beams of the Coffer slab
support beam
Step 30 Steel detailing of support beam tension reinforcing steel and nominal top reinforcing steel at mid-span
Identify the Coffer Step 31 Identify and name the Coffer portions between the support beams
configuration and the
Step 32 Select a Coffer portion and identify specific details from the drawing
minimum structural topping
thickness Step 33 Determine the minimum structural topping thickness due to deflection for selected Coffer height
Step 35 Determine the span end conditions and maximum moments of the Coffer slab
Determine the end
conditions, mid-span Step 36 Determine the moment of resistance of each Coffer rib
moment resistance and the
tension reinforcing steel Step 37 Determine the area of tension reinforcing steel required for each rib at mid-span
Coffer ribs/slab design
Step 42 Determine the area of nominal reinforcing steel at mid-span and at the supports for the Coffer slab
Determine the reinforcing
steel required at mid-span Step 43 Determine the area of tensile reinforcing steel required for the rib at the support beam
and supports
Step 44 Select the spacing and type of tensile reinforcing steel to be used at the rib support for bending
Check deflections for the Step 45 Check the deflections based on the basic allowable span of the ribs
Coffer slab Step 46 Calculate actual long-term deflections of the ribs
Step 47 Steel detailing of midspan tension reinforcing steel for the ribs
Step 48 Steel detailing of the stirrups for the ribs of the Coffer slab
Steel detailing of the
Coffer slab Step 49 Steel detailing of the nominal reinforcing steel at mid-span and the supports for the Coffer slab
Step 50 Steel detailing of tension reinforcing steel at the support and the nominal top reinforcing steel at mid-span
06
Coffers and Troughs
Legend
COFFER SLAB DESIGN
Coffer slab
design
If Mr in Step 17 is
less than imposed Determine the
Steel detailing of
moment, refer loads acting on the
the Coffer slab
back to Step 7 & support beams
(Steps 47 to 50)
increase the beam (Steps 13 to 15)
depth
steel required
span & supports
(Steps 20 to 22)
(Steps 42 to 44)
Determine support
Determine the
moments & tension
shear reinforcing
reinforcing steel
steel required
required
(Steps 39 to 41)
(Steps 23 to 25)
Identify Coffer
Determine the
configuration & the Steel detailing of
loads acting on the
minimum structural the support beam
Coffer slab
topping thickness (Steps 28 to 30)
(Step 34)
(Steps 31 to 33)
Coffer F H G
A
A
B
D
C B B
Side View B - B
A
B
Coffer - 3D View
Coffer Dimensions
(mm)
Coffer Size Coffer Displacement
(mm) (m3)
A B C D E F G H
08
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN Coffers and Troughs
The architect has requested a Coffer alternative to a solid slab solution, which will be significantly lighter in weight and more economical.
The floor slabs are to be designed for a building consisting of residential dwelling units along the coastline of Cape Town.
The floor slabs are to be supported on 400mm x 400mm columns.
The imposed loads on the floor slab are based on a “sub-category B5” (Refer to SANS 10160-2, Table 1 for the different categories and specific
uses).
A concrete compressive strength of 30 MPa and a tensile reinforcing steel strength 450 MPa is being used throughout the remainder of the
building and should be used for the floor slabs where possible.
To cater for fire resistance, the floor slabs must be designed tin accordance with the SABS 0100-1, Clause 7.
A portion of the Coffer slab, described in the abovementioned example, is shown in Figure 3 below.
The design example mainly concentrates on the design of Beam 7 and the Coffer portion between Beams W and Y.
Other portions of the Coffer slab shown in Figure 3 will only be discussed for clarification purposes as and when necessary.
A A1 B C D E F
1020 2730 4650 3600 3340 6560
Beam D
Beam 4
Beam 5
Beam 1
Beam 2
Beam 3
Beam 7
Beam 8
Beam 9
6000
External main
support beams
Beam 11
Beam 12
5625
Load bearing
4 Beam M Beam N Beam P wall
Beam 13
Beam 14
Beam 15
Beam 16
7000
Beam 19
Beam 18
4650
Internal main
support beams
Beam 22
Beam 23
5000
7 Beam X Beam Y
Beam 25
Beam 24
Beam 26
Columns
Step 1: Fill the complete slab with Coffers while leaving a beam around the perimeter of the floor slab.
This is done to simplify the layout and ensure that the spacing of the Coffers line up with each other (As shown in Figure 3).
The designer may deviate from Step 1 if a different Coffer layout is preferred due to other influences such as point loads on the slab.
The width of the internal support beams may be anything from 500 mm upwards.
The width of the support beams around the perimeter must be determined by the designer to suit the architectural and structural requirements.
The width and depth of each support beam must be verified, taking into consideration all applied dead and imposed loads.
Step 2: Identify all the load bearing walls that are supported on top of the slab.
In addition to supporting the required design loads, the designer should consider that the slab may also be required to support additional loads
such as from walls on top of the slab.
Draw the load bearing walls on the layout and remove all the coffers directly below the walls to form ‘load bearing wall beams’ (For example,
Beam 15 shown in Figure 3).
This immediately allows for a 900 mm support beam directly below each load bearing wall.
The width and depth of each support beam must be verified, taking into consideration all applied dead and imposed loads.
Step 3: Identify the main columns and load bearing walls below the slab.
Remove the rows of Coffers between the columns/wall supports to establish the ‘main support beams’ (As shown in Figure 3).
The width and depth of each ‘main support beam’ must be verified, taking into consideration all dead and imposed loads.
‘Load bearing wall beams’ must be introduced to support the load bearing walls that do not fall directly on the ‘main support beams’.
The ends of the ‘load bearing wall beams’ are supported by the ‘main support beams’ and act as point loads on the ‘main support beams’.
Step 4: Check if any further beams are required to create two-way spanning slabs.
The designer now has a basic layout to determine support beam widths, support widths and support conditions. (As shown in Figure 3).
In most cases, the spacing does not work out exactly as per the Coffer and Decking Panel dimensions, thus the designer is required to move the
Coffers around on the layout to try and get the supports as central as possible between two Coffer configurations.
The internal support beam widths should be 1500 mm, 1294 mm or 900 mm where possible to accommodate the Decking Panel sizes of 1425 mm,
1219 mm and 825 mm.
When this is not possible, infills or non-standard equipment will be required to form the soffit of the support beams which will have cost implications
and increase the erection time of the falsework.
These references identify each concrete element that is being designed and will be used when scheduling the reinforcing steel.
10
Coffers and Troughs
Where:
The Span Length ‘L’ is the distance between the centre lines of the supports.
In the case of a cantilever beam, the Span Length ‘L’ is the distance between the centre line of the support and the end of the cantilever beam.
For each beam configuration, the Span Length ‘L’ of the relevant beam between supports must be determined (using the drawing) and the
relevant ratio selected from Table 4.
To determine the worst-case scenario, the following 3 examples deal with different beam configurations within a typical Coffer slab.
Beam configuration 1:
Consider a beam with both ends continuous where L = 7000 mm (For example, Beam 14 shown in Figure 3)
Beam configuration 2:
Consider a truly simply supported beam where L = 6000 mm (For example, Beam 6 shown in Figure 3)
Beam configuration 3:
Consider a beam with one end continuous where L = 7000 mm (For example, Beam 16 shown in Figure 3)
7000 mm
= d = 292 mm.
24
From the example above, it can be seen that it is not always the longest span that results in the biggest deflection, but the deflection is also
dependent on the support conditions and obviously the imposed loading.
The designer is required to calculate the effective depth ‘d’ for all the different scenarios applicable to the specific layout drawing.
The largest effective depth ‘d’ is then used to determine the slab thickness ‘t’ for the whole slab.
Normally the slab thickness remains constant over the complete floor area, except where a definitive difference between spans or loads
occur and the designer opts for a thicker or thinner slab in a specific portion due to structural or financial constraints.
Cantilevers 7
11
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Example:
From Step 6, beam configuration 2 has the biggest effective depth ’d’ of 375 mm and must therefore be used to determine the required slab
thickness ‘t’
Assume Y16 reinforcing bars and R8 stirrups will be used for this example
The actual diameter of the reinforcing bars must be checked later and be replaced if necessary, in the calculation below
Required slab thickness ‘t’ = effective depth ‘d’ + cover to reinforcement + half the diameter of main reinforcing bars selected + the diameter of the
stirrups (diameterstirrup)
The 4 No. available heights of Coffers are given in Table 5 (Coffer Size mm).
Also refer to dimension ‘A’ in Table 3
The minimum structural topping thickness for each of the Coffer sizes are given in Table 5.
The minimum structural topping thickness should also be the greater of
50 mm or one-tenth of the clear span between ribs as given in
SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Clause 4.5.1.2(d).
Table 5 - Structural Topping Thickness For Coffers
The designer should select a compliant Coffer size which will yield the
least volume of concrete per m2. Minimum Maximum
Clear
Coffer Structural Structural
Coffer Size Distance
Different Coffer sizes are compared in the following scenarios. Displacement Topping Topping
(mm) Between Ribs
(m3) Thickness Thickness
Example: (mm)
(mm) (mm)
For illustration purposes, assume the floor area consists of 10 No. 525 0.117 562 56 250
Coffers (Refer to the Coffer slab between grid lines A1 and B / 3 and 4
in Figure 3) 425 0.168 602 60 250
Minimum slab thickness ‘t’ = 421 mm (From Step 7) 325 0.201 642 64 250
Floor Area = 10 Coffers x (0.9 m x 0.9 m in plan) = 8.1 m2. 225 0.232 682 68 250
Slab thickness of 421 mm – 225 mm Coffer = 196 mm topping > 68 mm and < 250 mm topping thickness (From Table 5, meets requirements)
Slab thickness of 421 mm – 325 mm Coffer = 96 mm topping > 64 mm and < 250 mm topping thickness (From Table 5, meets requirements)
Slab thickness of 421 mm – 425 mm Coffer = – 4 mm topping < 60 mm and < 250 mm topping thickness (From Table 5, topping not thick enough).
Slab thickness of 421 mm – 525 mm Coffer = – 104 mm topping < 56 mm and < 250 mm topping thickness (From Table 5, topping not thick enough)
Note:
From above, it can be seen that Scenario 2 is the most economical design.
If a solid slab was used as opposed to a Coffer slab, the volume of concrete for a 421 mm thick flat slab = 8.1 m2 x 421 mm = 3.410 m3.
If Scenario 2 is used instead of a flat slab, the concrete and reinforcing will be reduced by 49.3% in the Coffer slab portions.
12
Coffers and Troughs
Calculate the total volume and mass of a Coffer slab that consists of 10 No. 325 Coffers in one direction and 2 No. 325 Coffers in the
other direction.
Therefore, the total plan area of the Coffer slab = (0.9 m x 10 Coffers) x (0.9 m x 2 Coffers) = 9.0 m x 1.8 m = 16.2 m2
Assumed thickness of the structural topping = 100 mm (Maximum thickness = 250 mm)
Determine the volume of the equivalent solid concrete slab (Excluding the voids formed by the Coffers):
The total volume of concrete for the complete slab = 6.885 m3 – 3.360 m3 = 3.525 m3
The total mass of concrete for the complete slab = 3.525 m3 x 25 kN/m3 = 88.125 kN
Therefore, the mass of the concrete slab = 88.125 kN ÷ 16.2 m2 = 5.440 kN per m2 in plan.
Note:
The designer must allow for the additional mass of a non-structural screed over the entire area of the slab (Usually between 20 and
75 mm thick).
D F
Concrete support
10 x 2 rows of Coffers 10 No. Coffers = 9000 mm
beams
= 20 Coffers
2 No. Coffers =
1800 mm
Columns
13
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The assumption is made that the weight per Coffer portion is directly related to the weight per square metre of Coffer slab.
Example:
Coffer height + structural topping = 325 mm Coffer + 96 mm structural topping = 421 mm (From Step 8, Scenario 2)
Allow for a 50 mm thick non-structural screed with the same density as concrete
Concrete volume per Coffer area = ((0.325 m + 0.100 m + 0.050 m) x (0.9 m x 0.9 m in plan)) – 0.168 m3 = 0.217 m3 per Coffer
Concrete volume = [ 0.217 m3 ÷ (0.9 m x 0.9 m in plan) ] x (1.0 m x 1.0 m in plan) = 0.268 m3/m2 in plan
Therefore, the self weight of the Coffer portion of the slab = 0.268 m3/m2 x 25 kN/m3 = 6.700 kN/m2 in plan.
The only difference is that there is no deduction due to Coffer displacement and the full depth of the Coffer and structural topping is taken into
consideration when calculating the support beam depth and self-weight per m2 in plan.
Example:
Allow for a 50 mm thick non-structural screed with the same density as concrete
Step 11: Determine the imposed loading acting on the slab and support beam.
The designer needs to identify the specific use for every section of the building.
Refer to SANS 10160-2, Table 1 for the different categories and specific uses.
The same building may have several different uses in different portions of the building.
Step 12: Determine the loads acting on the slab and support beam.
For the slab and support beam design, use the ultimate limit state factors as specified in SANS 10160-1, Table 3.
Permanent actions (Dead Load) such as the self-weight of the beam or slab itself, screed, tiles, etc. are multiplied by a partial factor of 1.2.
Variable actions (Live Load) such as the imposed loads acting on the floor or roof are multiplied by a partial factor of 1.6.
These are then added together to determine a design load as shown below.
Example:
Coffer height + structural topping + non-structural screed = 325 mm Coffer + 100 mm structural topping + 50 mm screed = 475 mm (From Step 9)
Assume that the building consists of dwelling units, thus the imposed load = 1.5 kN/m2 (Refer SANS 10160-2, Table 1)
wslab = (1.2 x 6.700 kN/m2) + (1.6 x 1.5 kN/m2) = 10.440 kN/m2 in plan
wbeam = (1.2 x 11.875 kN/m2) + (1.6 x 1.5 kN/m2) = 16.650 kN/m2 in plan.
14
Coffers and Troughs
The designer needs to isolate each support beam and determine the Coffer configuration associated with that specific beam.
The configuration of the Coffer portion is of importance because it influences the number of Coffers acting on a specific beam.
SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Clause 4.4.4.3 states that if two slabs having the same supporting conditions meet at a corner, the dividing angle is 45
degrees.
The same clause also states that if a fully restrained edge meets a freely supported edge, the dividing angle on the restrained side is 60 degrees.
The two scenarios below show the number of Coffers supported by a specific beam.
Scenario 1:
Figure 5 below (Portion of the Coffer slab from Figure 3) shows 2 rows of 10 Coffers = 20 Coffers between the surrounding support beams.
The end Coffers are divided by a 45 degree line whereby half the weight of the divided end Coffers are carried by support beams D and H
and half the weight of the divided end Coffers are carried by support beams 4 and 5.
Beam D is supporting 8 complete Coffers plus half of the end Coffers = 8 Coffers + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer = Equivalent to 9 Coffers
Beam H is supporting 8 complete Coffers plus half of the end Coffers = 8 Coffers + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer = Equivalent to 9 Coffers
D F
Concrete support
ly = 9000 beams
Beam D
lx = 1800
Beam 4
Beam 5
Beam H 2
Columns
45 degree
lines
10 x 2 rows of
Coffers = 20 Coffers
15
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The end Coffers are divided by a 45 degree line whereby half the weight of the 2 divided end Coffers are carried by beams 7 and 8 and half the
weight of the 2 divided end Coffers are carried by beams F and K.
Beam 7 is supporting 4 complete Coffers plus 4 half Coffers = 4 Coffers + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer = Equivalent to 6 Coffers
Beam 8 is supporting 4 complete Coffers plus 4 half Coffers = 4 Coffers + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer = Equivalent to 6 Coffers
Beam F is supporting 2 complete Coffers plus 4 half Coffers = 2 Coffers + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer = Equivalent to 4 Coffers
Beam K is supporting 2 complete Coffers plus 4 half Coffers = 2 Coffers + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer + ½ Coffer = Equivalent to 4 Coffers.
A B C
2 Beam E Beam F
4 x 5 rows of Coffers
= 20 Coffers
ly = 4500
Beam 6
L = 6000
Beam 7
Beam 8
45 degree
lines
1500
3 Beam J Beam K
Columns
Note:
It can be seen from scenarios 1 and 2 above that even though two slabs can have the same number of Coffers (20 No.), the Coffer configuration
influences the number of Coffers acting on each respective support beam.
16
Coffers and Troughs
From Figure 5 and Figure 6, it can be seen that the load distribution will be either in a trapezoidal or triangular shape, depending on the length
of the sides of the slab.
For example, in Figure 6, Beam F has a load distribution from the slab that is triangular in shape, while Beam 7 has a load distribution acting
from the slab that is trapezoidal in shape.
It must be noted that even if the load from the Coffer slab is a trapezoidal or triangular shape, it is assumed to be a uniformly distributed load
over the length of the support beam.
The Coffer/slab configuration on the other side of each respective support beam must also be considered when determining the total load acting
on each beam.
If for example, there is a slab on the other side of Beam 7 (Shown in Figure 6), the load action from that slab must also be added to Beam 7.
To determine the load acting on a beam, refer to the formulas and example below.
nlx lx 2
Trapezoidal load w = (3 – ( ))
6 ly
nlx
Triangular load w=
3
Example:
lx (Length of shorter side of the slab between Beams 6 and 7) = 3 No. x 900 mm wide Coffers = 2700 mm (Refer to Figure 6)
ly (Length of longer side of the slab between Beams 6 and 7) = 5 No. x 900 mm wide Coffers = 4500 mm (Refer to Figure 6)
lx (Length of shorter side of the slab ‘lx’ between Beams 7 and 8) = 4 No. x 900 mm wide Coffers = 3600 mm (Refer to Figure 6)
ly (Length of longer side of the slab ‘ly’ between Beams 7 and 8) = 5 No. x 900 mm wide Coffers = 4500 mm (Refer to Figure 6)
(3 – (3.6
4.5 m ))
2
nlx lx 2 10.440 kN/m2 x 3.6 m m
Trapezoidal load w = (3 – ( )) = = 14.783 kN/m on Beam 8 side of Beam 7.
6 ly 6
Step 15: Determine the total load acting on the support beam.
Example:
Refer to Figure 6 and assume that Beam 7 is 1200 mm wide (This depends on the layout as designed in Steps 1 to 4).
wtotal = 19.980 kN/m + 27.186 kN/m = 47.166 kN/m. Use this load to determine the moments and area of reinforcing steel required to resist .
bending.
17
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
wl2
Mu.mid =
8
Scenario 2: Beam continuous one end (For example, Beam 16 shown in Figure 3)
wl2
Mu.mid =
10
Scenario 3: Beam continuous both ends (For example, Beam 7 shown in Figure 3)
wl2
Mu.mid =
12
wl2
Mu.mid =
2
If the span of the beams differ by more than 15%, a rational beam analysis should be done.
For example, Beam 7 (From Figure 6) is continuous both ends, therefore Scenario 3 will be applicable. Calculate the maximum mid-
The effective depth ‘d’ is the depth from external face of the compression zone of the beam to the centre of the tension reinforcement as stated
in SABS 0100 -1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.3.
Assume that the redistribution of moments does not to exceed 10%, thus K = 0.156 (Refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1).
To determine the moment of resistance, apply the formula Mr = Kbd2fcu (Refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1).
Example:
Mr = Kbd2fcu = 0.156 x 1200 mm x (379 mm)2 x 30 MPa = 0.156 x 1.2 m x (0.379 m)2 x 30 x 103 kN/m2 = 806.688 kN.m.
18
Coffers and Troughs
Mu.mid
K = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcing steel is required in addition to the tension reinforcing steel.
If compression reinforcing steel is required, the designer should consider increasing the width and/or depth of the support beam as it is not
ideal to design for compression reinforcing steel.
If the slab depth is changed, go back to Step 7 and reassess the design.
This Concrete Design Guide does not deal with the design for compression reinforcing steel at mid-span.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement at mid-span is determined using the following equation:
Mu.mid
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a rectangular beam is given in Table 6.
Minimum Percentage
Tension Reinforcing Definition Of
Steel Percentage
fy = 250 MPa fy = 450 MPa
fy = 450 MPa for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
z = lesser of 0.95 x 379 mm = 360 mm and 379 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.018 ÷ 0.9)) = 371 mm
As.min = 0.13 (From Table 6) x (Ac ÷ 100) = 0.13 x (510 x 103 mm2 ÷ 100) = 663 mm2
The required cross-sectional area per reinforcing bar can be determined by dividing the total reinforcing steel area required (As.req) by the number of
reinforcing bars provided.
This cross-sectional area must be compared to the values given in Table 7 to determine the reinforcing bar diameter that will meet the minimum
cross-sectional area requirements.
12 113 2260 1510 1130 905 754 646 566 452 377
16 201 4020 2680 2010 1610 1340 1150 1010 804 670
20 314 6280 4190 3140 2510 2090 1800 1570 1260 1050
25 491 9820 6550 4910 3930 3270 2810 2450 1960 1640
32 804 16100 10700 8040 6430 5360 4600 4020 3220 2680
40 1257 25100 16800 12600 10100 8380 7180 6280 5030 4190
First, check that the assumed and calculated spacing of the reinforcing bars is smaller than the maximum spacing allowed for the specific section by
y1 + y2 As.req 1
calculating the service stress fs = 0.87fy x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y 4 As.prov βb
Where:
βb = ratio of resistance moment at mid-span obtained from the redistributed maximum moments diagram to that obtained from the maximum
moments diagram before redistribution = 1.0
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1; SANS 10160-1, Table 3, and SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1)
Then, check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4).
Example:
Number of reinforcing bars = b – (2 x cover) ÷ spacing + 1 bar = 1200 mm – (2 x 30 mm) ÷ 170 mm = 6.7 bars + 1 bar = 7.7 rounded up to 8 bars
Actual spacing = b – (2 x cover) ÷ (number of bars – 1 bar) = 1200 mm – (2 x 30 mm) ÷ (8 – 1) = 163 mm rounded down to 160 mm
Required cross-sectional area per reinforcing bar = As.req ÷ number of reinforcing bars = 1004 mm2 ÷ 8 = 125.5 mm2 per reinforcing bar
From Table 7 it can be seen that 1 No. Y16 reinforcing bar has a cross sectional area of 201 mm2 which is greater than the required cross-sectional
area of 125.5 mm2 per reinforcing bar
The total area As.prov = 8 No. x 201 mm2 = 1608 mm2, which is greater than 1004 mm2, therefore reinforcing steel is okay
20
Coffers and Troughs
Therefore, to cater for the bending moment, use 8 No. Y16 reinforcing bars at a spacing of 160 mm.
The designer can choose a larger spacing than the spacing calculated above and re-check the diameter of the reinforcing bars required.
To determine the most economical reinforcing steel, it all depends on the maximum spacing allowed for specific diameters of reinforcing bars.
Each stirrup has 2 vertical legs which provides a position in each corner for 1 main longitudinal bar.
The number of bars in the support beam is divided by 2 to determine the number of stirrups.
If the total number of main longitudinal tension bars is an uneven number, 1 No. tension bar runs in the middle of the beam without being in the
corner of a stirrup.
Example:
Tension reinforcing steel = 8 No. Y16 bars at a spacing of 160 mm (From Step 19)
Number of stirrups = 8 No. Y16 ÷ 2 tension bars per stirrup = 4 stirrups type A, B, C and D (Refer to Figure 7)
The designer may choose any preferred stirrup configuration provided that the minimum requirement for shear is met
Example 1 will be the least expensive configuration due to less reinforcing steel being used.
Concrete
support beam
Stirrups
A B B C C D D A
Example 1
Concrete
support beam
Stirrups
A B C D D C B A
Example 2
To check the maximum shear strength of a beam, the reaction forces at the internal support must be determined.
If both supports are under continuous beams, both supports must be analysed and the worst case shear force is used in the design calculations.
The design shear stress ‘v’ at any cross-section of the beam should not exceed a value of the lesser of fcu or 4.75 MPa. (Refer to SABS
0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1).
V
Design shear stress v = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1).
bd
In the above equation, it is generally accepted that the value of 0.75 may be increased to 0.79 for design purposes.
The value of 0.75 is used throughout in this Concrete Design Guide.
Where
( )100As
bvd
should not be taken as greater than 3 (refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2).
The design shear stress must be less than the maximum design shear stress, if not, either additional shear reinforcement must be added or the
cross-section of the beam should be altered.
To determine the required ratio of shear reinforcement to rebar spacing, apply the following equation:
Where:
fyv is the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa = 250 N/mm2)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3)
Example:
Partial safety factor for materials for shear strength without shear reinforcement and shear taken by concrete in combination with shear reinforcement
γm = 1.40 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 3.3.3.2)
Design shear force V = 2 x 141.498 kN = 282.996 kN, assuming that lengths are the same on either side of the internal support
The designer should do a proper beam analysis to determine the reaction forces on each support, preferably using a specialist software package
V
Design shear stress v =
bd
Maximum shear stress vmax = smaller of 0.75 30 = 4.108 MPa and 4.75 MPa
22
Coffers and Troughs
( 30 N/mm ) (379400mm)
0.75 2 ⅓ ⅓ ¼
vc = (0.354) = 0.408 N/mm 2 = 0.408 MPa
1.4 25
To determine the required ratio of shear reinforcement to the reinforcing bar spacing, apply the following equation:
The spacing should not exceed 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcement.
The initial assumption is made that the spacing of the stirrups is just below 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcing steel.
If the assumed spacing of the stirrups is found to be insufficient, the spacing must be reduced accordingly.
If the following equation is true, then the spacing is okay, if not, reduce the spacing:
Where:
fyv = the characteristic shear strength of the link reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3)
Example:
Therefore the number of legs = 4 No. x 2 legs per stirrup = 8 No. legs
Asv
= 1.181 (From Step 21)
sv
The designer can increase the spacing for a more economical design provided the maximum spacing does not exceed 0.75d.
Provide 4 R8 stirrups @ 250 mm spacing along the full length of the support beam as per Figure 11.
Also provide a clip at the top for each set of stirrups. The clips assist the contractor with the fixing of the reinforcing steel.
23
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Scenario 1:
External support on continuous beam (For example, the column at grid lines 2/A shown in Figure 3)
Mu.sup = 0
Scenario 2:
1st Internal support on continuous beam (For example, the column at grid lines 2/B shown in Figure 3)
wl2
Mu.sup = –
9
Scenario 3:
2nd Internal support on continuous beam (For example, the column at grid lines 2/C shown in Figure 3)
wl2
Mu.mid = –
12
Scenario 4:
Simply supported beam (For example, Beam 6 shown in Figure 3)
Mu.mid = 0
If the span of the beams differ by more than 15%, a rational beam analysis should be done.
Example:
Assume that Beam 7 is continuous both ends, thus scenario 2 or 3 will be applicable depending on the support being designed
Assume the 1st internal support is being designed, then Scenario 2 is applicable
24
Coffers and Troughs
This is achieved by checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.sup
K= (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcement is required in addition to the tension reinforcement.
If this is the case, the designer should increase the width of the beam as it is not ideal to design for compression reinforcement.
This Design Guide will not discuss the design for compression reinforcement at mid-span.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement is determined using the following equation:
Mu.sup
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a rectangular beam is given in Table 6 (Refer to Step 18).
Example:
fy = 450 MPa for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
z = lesser of 0.95 x 379 mm = 360 mm and 379 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.024 ÷ 0.9)) = 369 mm
25
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The designer can assume the spacing and number of reinforcing bars to be the same as the spacing for the reinforcement at mid-span as
determined in Step 19 to simplify the fixing of the reinforcing bars.
The required cross-sectional area of each reinforcing bar (As.req) can be determined by dividing the total required area of reinforcement by the
number of reinforcing bars provided.
To meet the minimum cross-sectional area requirements, this cross-sectional area must be compared to the values given in Table 7 to determine the
diameter of the reinforcing bar required.
First, check that the assumed and calculated spacing of the reinforcing bars is smaller than the maximum spacing allowed for the specific section by
y 1 + y2 As.req 1
calculating the service stress fs = 0.87fy x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y 4 As.prov βb
Where:
βb = ratio of resistance moment at mid-span obtained from the redistributed maximum moments diagram to that obtained from the maximum
moments diagram before redistribution = 1.0
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1; SANS 10160-1, Table 3, and SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1)
Then, check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4).
Example:
Required cross-sectional area per reinforcing bar = As.req ÷ number of reinforcing bars = 1339 mm2 ÷ 8 = 167 mm2 per reinforcing bar
From Table 7, a Y16 reinforcing bar has a larger cross-sectional area (201 mm2 ) than the required reinforcing bar area of 167 mm2
For a more economical design, instead of using 8 No. Y16, use 6 No. Y16 and 2 No. Y12 reinforcing bars.
The total area As.prov = 6 No. x 201 mm2 + 2 No. x 113 mm2 = 1432 mm2, which is greater than 1339 mm2, therefore reinforcing steel is okay
Check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs
Therefore, to cater for the moment, use 6 No. Y16 and 2 No. Y12 reinforcing bars at a spacing of 160 mm for Beam 7.
The designer can choose a larger spacing than the spacing calculated above and re-check the diameter of the reinforcing bars required.
To determine the most economical reinforcing steeI, it all depends on the maximum spacing allowed for specific diameters of reinforcing bars.
26
Coffers and Troughs
Serviceability Limit State Load = 1.1DL + 1.0LL (Refer to SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1).
The basic span/effective depth ratio value obtained from Table 4 must be modified with a modification factor that takes into account the amount of
tension reinforcement and the associated stresses when the allowable span/effective depth ratio is calculated.
The modification factor is derived from the following equation:
477 – fs
Modification factor = 0.55 + ≤ 2.0 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
( )
Mu
120 0.9 +
bd2
The allowable span/effective depth ratio will then be the basic span/effective depth ratio multiplied by the calculated modification factor.
The actual span/effective depth ratio can now be calculated using the beam layout shown in Figure 8.
If the actual span/effective depth ratio is bigger than the allowable span/effective depth ratio, the beam fails due to deflection.
Example:
The end span condition for Beam 7 = continuous both ends (Refer to Figure 8)
A B C
Concrete support
lx = 2700 1200 lx = 3600
beams
1500
2 Beam E Beam F
45 degree
lines forming
a trapezoidal
shape in plan
ly = 4500
Beam 6
L = 6000
Beam 7
Beam 8
1500
3 Beam J Beam K
Coffers Columns
Where:
DLbeam = 11.875 kN/m2 x 1.2 m wide = 14.250 kN/m (From Step 10)
LLbeam = 1.5 kN/m2 x 1.2 m wide = 1.800 kN/m (From Step 12)
Beam load = (1.1 x 14.250 kN/m) + (1.0 x 1.800 kN/m) = 17.475 kN/m
Total serviceability load w = 17.475 kN/m + 10.538 kN/m + 12.560 kN/m = 40.573 kN/m
27
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Where:
Where:
(
120 0.9 +
Mu
bd2 ) (
120 0.9 N/mm2 +
141.498 x 106 N.mm
1200 mm x (379 mm)2)
The modification factor of 1.843 is smaller than 2.0, therefore take the modification factor as 1.843
Allowable span/effective depth ratio = (Modification factor) x (Basic span/effective depth ratio)
Where:
Actual span ÷ effective depth = 6000 mm ÷ 379 mm = 15.8 < 51.6 therefore the beam is okay.
28
Coffers and Troughs
This is done by taking the width and the thickness of the beam into consideration using the following formula:
bh3
Ix =
12
The short-term modulus of elasticity for the specified strength of the concrete can be determined from Table 8.
For long term deflections, a conservative assumption is that the modulus of elasticity is only half the value given in Table 8.
20 25
25 26
30 28
40 31
50 34
60 36
Long term deflections can then be determined using one of the following equations:
5wl4
Truly simply supported beam δ = (For example, Beam 6 shown in Figure 3)
384EcIx
wl4
Beam with one end continuous δ = 0.0099 (For example, Beam 16 shown in Figure 3)
EcIx
wl4
Beam with both ends continuous δ = 0.0068 (For example, Beam 7 shown in Figure 3)
EcIx
The recommended limit to prevent damage to finishes and partitions is the span divided by 250 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.2.1).
If the calculated actual long-term deflection is less that the recommended limit, then the beam is okay.
Example:
wl4 0.0068 x (40.573 kN/m) x (6000 mm)4 0.0068 x (40.573 x 103 kN/mm) x (6000 mm)4
δ = 0.0068 = = = = 3.3 mm
EcIx (14 x 103 GPa) x (7.677 x 109 mm4) (14 x 10-6 kN/mm2) x (7.677 x 109 mm4)
Span 6000 mm
Recommended limit = = = 24.0 mm
250 250
3.3 mm < 24.0 mm therefore the deflection of the slab is okay.
If the long-term deflection exceeds the recommended limit, the excessive deflection may be offset by specifying a pre-camber for the beam.
29
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Example: C
B
Coffers
Apply Rule 4 to Beam 7 (Continuous beam):
Beam 8
Beam 7
5600
Rule 4.2:
The remainder of the reinforcing bars = (8 bars – 4 bars) = 4 No. bars
(6000 mm + 379 mm) = 6379 mm and (6000 mm + 500 mm + 500 mm) = 7000 mm Figure 9 – Typical Plan View Of Coffer And Beam Layout
(Extract From Figure 3)
These reinforcing bars must extend to within (0.2 x 6379 mm) = 1276 mm from the centre line of the supports.
Rule 4.3:
The remaining 2 No. reinforcing bars shall extend to within 0.1L of the centre line of supports
(6000 mm + 379 mm) = 6379 mm and (6000 mm + 500 mm + 500 mm) = 7000 mm
These reinforcing bars must extend to within (0.1 x 6379 mm) = 638 mm from the centre line of the supports.
Note:
Although Rules 4.2 and 4.3 are generally applicable, due to the stirrup configuration, all 8 No. reinforcing bars should at least extend all the way up to
the inside face of the supports so that the bottom corners of the stirrups can be secured in position.
It is further recommended that at least 50% of the reinforcing bars extend at least 12 bar diameters beyond the centre line of the supports as shown
in Figures 10, 11 and 12.
30
Coffers and Troughs
Beam 7
B
400 x 400
Columns
Inside face of Inside face of
support support
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
A A
Beam 7
1200
Concrete Beam 7
415
8Y16-160 B
(As per rules in Step 28)
Section B - B
31
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Provide R8 stirrups type A, B, C and D at a 250 mm spacing (From Step 22), along the full length of Beam 7, as shown in Figure 11.
Also provided an additional R8 reinforcing bar (Clip) at the top of each set of stirrups. These bars facilitate the easy fixing of the reinforcement steel.
In addition to the bottom tension reinforcement, Figure 11 shows the reinforcing stirrups for Beam 7.
Beam 7
B
4+4Y16-160 B 400 x 400
(As per ‘Note’ in Step 28) Columns
Inside face of
support
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
Beam 7
A A
R8-160 T (Clips)
8Y16-160 B
(As per rules in Step 28)
Section B - B
32
Coffers and Troughs
Example:
Tension reinforcement = 6Y16 and 2Y12 reinforcing bars, each at a spacing of 160 mm (From Step 19)
Span length ‘L’ = lesser of (5600 mm + 379 mm) = 5979 mm and (5600 mm + 200 mm + 200 mm) = 6000 mm.
Rule 4.1:
These 2 No. Y16 top reinforcing bars must be continuous through the spans.
Rule 4.2:
These 6 No. bars make up the 80% balance of the top reinforcing bars.
In this example, Y16 and Y12 reinforcing bars are being used for the top reinforcing steel.
To prevent an unbalanced configuration of the top reinforcing bars over the support, allow the remaining 6 No. reinforcing bars to extend
past the face of the support by the larger of 0.25L or 45d from the face of the support.
Therefore, extend the remaining 6 No. top reinforcing bars 1495 mm (1500 mm rounded up) past the face of the support.
Note:
To assist with the fixing of the reinforcing bars, it may be prudent to have the same number of top and bottom reinforcing bars.
The 6 No. remaining top reinforcing bars may be made continuous, through the length of the support beam, using a reduced reinforcing bar
diameter.
The designer can use any reduced reinforcing bar diameter because the minimum required area of steel is already in place.
In this case, it would be the most economical to use 2 No. Y16 and 6 No. Y12 top reinforcing bars over the mid-span of Beam 7.
33
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
1Y12 T (EF) 0.25L = 1500 3Y12 T (EF) 0.25L = 1500 1Y12 T (EF)
6Y16-160 T 2Y16-160 T 6Y16-160 T
Beam 7
B
21R8-250 Stirrups Type A, B, C and D
21R8-250 T (Clips)
400 x 400
8Y16-160 B Columns
(As per ‘Note’ in Step 28) Inside face of
support
A A
Beam 7
CL Support CL Support
Plan View
R8-160 T (Clips)
8Y16-160 B
(As per rules in Steps 28 and 30)
Section B - B
Identify all the Coffer portions between the support beams, for example C1, C2, C3, etc. as shown in Figure 13.
The identification of each Coffer portion will be used as a cross reference during the design phase and later when scheduling the reinforcing
steel.
Internal main
Coffer portions between
support beams
support beams
Rib ‘Y’
C4 C5 C6
ley = 6940
Ly = 6300
C1 C2 C3
Rib ‘Y’
7 6
Step 32: Select a Coffer portion and identify specific details from the drawing.
Select a Coffer portion, for example portion C2 in Figure 13 and establish the relative Coffer configuration, width of the support beams
and support end conditions.
Example:
For this example, Beam Y = 1400 mm wide and supports the ends of each Rib ‘X’ on either side of the beam, therefore these Ribs are
continuous over this support beam
For this example, Beam W = 1400 mm wide and supports the ends of each Rib ‘X’ on either side of the beam, therefore these Ribs are
continuous over this support beam
For this example, Beam 22 = 900 mm wide and supports the ends of each Rib ‘Y’ on either side of the beam, therefore these Ribs are
continuous over this support beam
For this example, Beam 23 = 380 mm wide and supports the ends of each Rib ‘Y’ on one side of the beam, therefore these Ribs are
discontinuous over this support beam
The above example shows that Rib ‘X’ is continuous in both directions whereas Rib ‘Y’ is continuous in one direction only.
35
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Step 33: Determine the minimum structural topping thickness due to deflection, for the selected Coffer height.
The total slab thickness will remain the same as previously determined in Step 8.
Refer to Table 9 to determine the minimum structural topping thickness required for each Coffer size when considering deflection.
Clear Minimum
Clear Distance Rib Width At Average Rib Rib Width At
Distance Structural
Coffer Size Between Ribs Top Width Bottom
Topping
(mm) At Top 'brib.top' 'brib.ave' 'brib.bot'
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm) (mm)
Figure 14 gives the concrete dimensions for the different Coffer sizes.
Non-structural
brib.top 900 – (brib.top ÷ 2) brib.top Screed
Minimum structural
topping thickness
brib.ave brib.ave
Coffer size
5
900
CL Rib CL Rib
Example:
Coffer height + structural topping = 325 mm Coffer + 100 mm structural topping = 425 mm (From Step 9).
The minimum structural topping thickness for a 325 Coffer = 64 mm (From Table 9).
Step 34: Determine the self-weight of the Coffer slab and imposed loads on the Coffer slab.
The self-weight and imposed loads acting on the Coffer slab will be the same as determined in Steps 11 and 12.
Example:
wslab = (1.2 x 5.425 kN/m2) + (1.6 x 1.5 kN/m2) = 8.910 kN/m2 (From Step 12).
36
Coffers and Troughs
The end conditions and supporting conditions have a major impact on the moment calculation for every rib.
There are 3 scenarios to be considered before calculating the maximum moment for each rib.
Scenario 1:
Where the corners are prevented from lifting and provision for torsion is made, the maximum moment for each span can be calculated using the
following equations:
Msx = βsxnlx2
Msy = βsynlx2
Where n = 1.2DL + 1.6LL calculated in Step 34 and the factors βsx and βsy are determined using interpolation of factors from Table 10.
The designer must identify which case is applicable due to the slab conditions as described in the ‘Type Of Coffer Portions And Moment Considered’
column in Table 10.
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.4.4.2).
Note:
The length of the shorter span must be used in both equations.
Table 10 - Bending Moment Coefficients For Rectangular Coffer Portions Supported On Four Sides With Provision For
Torsional Reinforcement At The Corners
1 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.031 0.037 0.042 0.046 0.050 0.053 0.059 0.063 0.032
Positive moment at mid-span 0.024 0.028 0.032 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.045 0.049 0.024
2 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.039 0.044 0.048 0.052 0.055 0.058 0.063 0.067 0.037
Positive moment at mid-span 0.029 0.033 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.043 0.047 0.050 0.028
3 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.039 0.049 0.056 0.062 0.068 0.073 0.082 0.089 0.037
Positive moment at mid-span 0.030 0.036 0.042 0.047 0.051 0.055 0.062 0.067 0.028
4 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.047 0.056 0.063 0.069 0.074 0.078 0.087 0.092 0.045
Positive moment at mid-span 0.036 0.042 0.047 0.051 0.055 0.059 0.065 0.070 0.034
5 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.046 0.050 0.054 0.057 0.06 0.062 0.067 0.070 -
Positive moment at mid-span 0.034 0.038 0.040 0.043 0.045 0.045 0.047 0.053 0.034
Positive moment at mid-span 0.034 0.046 0.056 0.065 0.072 0.078 0.091 0.100 0.034
Three edges discontinuous (one long edge
continuous)
7 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.057 0.065 0.071 0.076 0.080 0.084 0.092 0.098 -
Positive moment at mid-span 0.043 0.048 0.053 0.057 0.060 0.063 0.069 0.074 0.044
Three edges discontinuous (one short edge
continuous)
8 Negative moment at continuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.058
Positive moment at mid-span 0.042 0.054 0.063 0.071 0.078 0.084 0.096 0.105 0.044
Torsional reinforcement at any corner contained by edges, over only one of which is where the slab is continuous, the reinforcement should be half of
the reinforcement described in the paragraph above.
Scenario 2:
Where the rectangular slab is simply supported on four sides and does not have adequate provision to resist torsion at the corners.
The maximum moment to prevent the corners from lifting can be determined using the following equations:
Msx = αsxnlex2
Table 11 - Bending Moment Coefficients
Msy = αsynlex2 For Slabs Spanning In Two Directions At
Right Angles And Simply Supported On
Where: Four Sides
n = 1.2DL + 1.6LL calculated in Step 34 and the factors αsx and αsy are determined using ly / l x αsx αsy
interpolation of factors from Table 11.
1.0 0.045 0.045
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.4.4.1).
1.1 0.061 0.038
Scenario 3:
A one way spanning slab is when ly ≥ 3lx and the following is used to determine the maximum 1.2 0.071 0.031
moments in the short span direction for the ribs. 1.3 0.08 0.027
There are 3 sub-scenarios to consider: 1.4 0.087 0.023
Therefore the slab corners are prevented from lifting and provision for torsion has to be made.
Msx = βsxnlx2
Msy = βsynlx2
The slab layout in Figure 13, Step 31, has one short edge that is discontinuous and is therefore select Case 2 from Table 10.
Extract From Table 10 - Bending Moment Coefficients For Rectangular Coffer Portions Supported On Four Sides With Provision For
Torsional Reinforcement At The Corners
2 Negative moment at continuous edge 0.039 0.044 0.048 0.052 0.055 0.058 0.063 0.067 0.037
Positive moment at mid-span 0.029 0.033 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.043 0.047 0.05 0.028
38
Coffers and Troughs
If the value is not exactly the same as the given value of ly / lx in Table 10, the designer must interpolate to determine the actual values of βsx and βsy
The effective depth ‘d’ is the depth from external face of the compression zone of the beam to the centre of the tension reinforcement as stated in
SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.3.
The relevant cover to reinforcing steel must be chosen depending on the requirement of structure.
Assume the width of the rib to be the width at the bottom of the rib and not the width of the rib at the top where the rib and the structural topping
meet.
The width brib.bot of the rib used in the moment of resistance calculation will then always be taken as 128 mm (Refer to Figure 14).
Assume the redistribution of moments do not exceed 10%, therefore K = 0.156 (Refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1).
If the moment of resistance is substantially bigger that the actual maximum bending moments over the complete design, an option would be to
increase the concrete strength.
Example:
Stirrup = R8 (Assumed)
Mr = Kbd2fcu = 0.156 x 128 mm x (379 mm)2 x 30 MPa = 0.156 x 0.128 m x (0.379 m)2 x 0.03 x 106 kN/m2 = 86.047 kN.m.
39
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
This is achieved by checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.mid
K= (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcing steel is required in addition to the tension reinforcing steel.
This Concrete Design Guide does not deal with the design for compression reinforcing steel.
Example:
This example will only consider the largest mid-span moment, which will always be in the direction of the short span
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement at mid-span is determined using the following equation:
Mu.mid
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a flanged beam with the web in tension is given in Table 12.
Minimum Percentage
Tension Reinforcement Definition Of Percentage
fy = 450 MPa for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
z = lesser of 0.95 x 379 mm = 360 mm and 379 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.019 ÷ 0.9)) = 371 mm
bwh = brib.ave x tbeam = 193 mm x 425 mm = 82.025 x103 mm2 per rib
As.min = 0.18 x bwh ÷ 100 = 0.18 x 82.025 x 103 ÷ 100 = 148 mm2 per rib
Ac = (brib.ave x hrib) + (btopping x ttopping) = (193 mm x 325 mm) + (900 mm x 100 mm) = 152.725 x 103 mm2 per rib
The diameter and spacing of the reinforcing bars must now be determined.
In the Coffer beam calculation the designer assumed a reinforcing bar spacing of 170 mm.
However, the ribs are spaced at 900 mm (As shown in Figure 14), and assuming that only 1 No. reinforcing bar is used per rib, a reinforcing bar
spacing of 900 mm is accepted.
The total width of a rib at the bottom is 128 mm (From Table 9), which is less than 170 mm.
If it is not be possible to have only one reinforcing bar (due to the imposed moments), the designer can use more reinforcing bars, but the spacing
within the rib must be checked to ensure that there is adequate space for concrete to flow around the reinforcing bars.
The required cross-sectional area (As.req) per reinforcing bar can be determined by dividing the total area of reinforcing steel required per metre
width by the number of reinforcing bars provided at a spacing of 900 mm.
Table 7 must be used to determine the diameter of the reinforcing bars that are required to meet the minimum cross-sectional area requirements.
The designer must now check that the assumed calculated spacing is smaller than the maximum spacing allowed for the specific section if more
than one reinforcing bar is required.
The maximum spacing of reinforcing bars is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4).
Note that this only applies to slabs and beams.
By default, the ribs are spaced at 900 mm center to center, which is allowed for in the reinforcement calculation.
y 1 + y2 As.req 1
The service stress fs = 0.87fy x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y 4 As.prov βb
Where:
βb = ratio of resistance moment at mid-span obtained from the redistributed maximum moments diagram to that obtained from the maximum
moments diagram before redistribution = 1.0
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1; SANS 10160-1, Table 3, and SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1).
Example:
Number of reinforcing bars = 1 No. per rib (Reinforcing bar spacing is not applicable because only 1 No. reinforcing bar is used)
As.prov = 201 mm2 which is greater than the required area of 148 mm2, therefore 1 No. Y16 reinforcing bar is sufficient to cater for the moment
By default, the spacing of 218 mm will not be applicable in the rib calculation due to the ribs being at a spacing of 900 mm centre to centre.
41
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The number of stirrups is based on the number of longitudinal tension reinforcing bars present in the rib under consideration.
Each stirrup in the ribs has 2 vertical legs (As shown in Figure 15) which provides a central position at the bottom for 1 No. longitudinal tension
reinforcing bar.
The intervals or spacing at which the stirrups are positioned along the length of the rib, is based on the shear resistance required for the rib as
discussed in Step 40.
200
Assume all stirrups are R8 mild steel reinforcing bars.
90
R8 Stirrup
415
Longitudinal tension reinforcing bar
325
128
Assuming the ribs are truly simply supported, the designer can conservatively determine the reaction forces at each side of the two-way
spanning Coffer slab.
The two formulas below can be used to determine the reaction forces for the ribs in the long and short direction:
nlx lx 2
Trapezoidal load w = ( (3 – ( ) )) x 0.9 m (Short direction)
6 ly
nlx
Triangular load w= ( ) x 0.9 m (Long direction)
3
Note that the results from above formulas are in kN per rib, where the ribs are at a 900 mm spacing
The formulas are multiplied by 0.9 m, to convert the results from kN per m to kN per rib.
Example:
lex (Effective length of shorter side of the slab) = 5000 mm = 5.0 m (From Step 32)
ley (Effective length of longer side of the slab) = 6940 mm = 6.94 m (From Step 32)
Although this load varies, assume the load to be uniform over the length of the rib
The design shear stress ‘v’ at any x-section of the rib shall not exceed a value of the lesser of 0.75√(fcu) or 4.75 MPa
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1)
V
Design shear stress v = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1)
bd
(25) ( b d ) (400
d )
0.75 fcu ⅓ 100As ⅓ ¼
Maximum design shear stress of concrete vc = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2)
ym v
100As
shall not be taken as greater than 3. (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2)
bvd
The design shear stress should be less than the maximum design shear stress, if not, additional shear reinforcing steel must be added.
42 The cross-section of a rib cannot be altered to allow for increased shear capacity as was the case in the design of the support beams.
Coffers and Troughs
Where:
fyv is the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3).
Example:
As.prov = 1 No. Y16 reinforcing bar = 201 mm2 (From Step 38)
Partial safety factor for materials for shear strength without shear reinforcement and shear taken by concrete in combination with shear
reinforcement ym = 1.40 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 3.3.3.2)
V
Design shear stress v =
bd
Maximum shear stress vmax = smaller of 0.75 30 = 4.108 MPa and 4.75 MPa
1.4 ( ) (379400mm)
0.75 30 N/mm 2 ⅓ ⅓ ¼
vc = (0.275) = 0.375 N/mm 2 = 0.375 MPa
25
Where:
fyv is the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3)
Asv 193 mm (0.266 N/mm2 – 0.375 N/mm2)
≥ = – 0.097 (This ratio will be used in Step 41 to determine the spacing of the stirrups)
sv 0.87 x 250 N/mm2
The negative value is a further indication that no shear reinforcement is required and that the longitudinal tension reinforcement is sufficient to
cater for the shear.
43
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The spacing should not exceed 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcement.
The initial assumption is made that the spacing of the stirrups is just below 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcing steel.
If the assumed spacing of the stirrups is found to be insufficient, the spacing must be reduced accordingly.
If the following equation is true, then the spacing is okay, if not, reduce the spacing:
Where:
fyv = the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3)
Example:
Thus number of legs = 1 No. stirrup x 2 legs per stirrup = 2 No. legs
Asv
= – 0.097 (From Step 40)
sv
Asv.req = – 0.097 x 250 mm = – 24.25 mm2. The area required cannot be less than 0, therefore accept R8 stirrups at a spacing of 250 mm
Step 42: Determine the area of nominal reinforcing steel at mid-span and at the supports for the Coffer slab.
A single layer of mesh reinforcement should be provided to control cracking in the structural topping.
The mesh should have a cross-sectional area of at least 0.12% of the cross-sectional area of the topping, in each direction, and the spacing of the
bars in the mesh should not exceed half the centre to centre distance between the ribs.
(Refer to SABS 10100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.5.6.2.2).
Referring to Table 13, Mesh Ref 245 = 124.8 mm2 > 108 mm2 Ref 617 10.0 200 x 200 314.4
44
Coffers and Troughs
This is achieved by checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.sup
K= (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcing steel is required in addition to the tension reinforcing steel.
This Concrete Design Guide does not deal with the design for compression reinforcing steel.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcing steel is determined using the following equation:
Mu.sup
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a flanged beam is given in Table 14.
Minimum Percentage
Tension Reinforcement Definition Of Percentage
fy = 450 MPa for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
z = lesser of 0.95 x 379 mm = 360 mm and 379 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.017 ÷ 0.9)) = 372 mm
As.min = 0.26 x Ac ÷ 100 = 0.26 x 90.0 x 103 mm2 ÷ 100 = 234 mm2
As.max > As.req < As.min therefore As.req = 234 mm2 per rib (Or every 900 mm center to center of ribs).
45
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The diameter and spacing of the reinforcing bars must now be determined.
The designer can assume the spacing between top tensile reinforcing bars to be 900 mm centre to centre, because this is the spacing of the ribs.
Compare the cross-sectional area determined in Step 43 to the values given in Table 7, to determine the minimum diameter of the reinforcing
bars required.
Note:
If there is a marginal shortfall of top reinforcement, the mesh reinforcing steel in the structural topping should be taken into account, as
calculated in Step 42.
Example:
fy = 450 MPa = 450 N/mm2 for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
As.req = 234 mm2 per 900 mm rib spacing (From Step 43) due to the minimum cross-sectional area of the concrete structural topping
As.req = 102 mm2 per 900 mm rib spacing (From Step 43) due to the actual support moment
As.mesh = 125 mm2 per 900 mm wide structural topping over each rib (From Step 42)
Therefore, the new area of steel required As.req.new = 234 mm2 – 125 mm2 = 109 mm2
From Table 7, 1 No. Y12 reinforcing bar with a cross-sectional area of 113 mm2 in the structural topping is sufficient
The total area As.prov = 125 mm2 + 113 mm2 = 238 mm2
The mesh reinforcing bar spacing of 200 mm for is larger than the maximum spacing of 163 mm.
In this case, the 1 No. Y12 provided (113 mm2) is larger than the actual area of steel required due to the moment (102 mm2), therefore the
spacing can be ignored.
46
Coffers and Troughs
Serviceability Limit State Load = 1.1DL + 1.0LL (Refer to SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1).
The basic span/effective depth ratio value obtained from Table 4 must be modified with a modification factor that takes into account the amount of
tension reinforcement and the associated stresses when the allowable span/effective depth ratio is calculated.
The allowable span/effective depth ratio will then be the basic span/effective depth ratio multiplied by the calculated modification factor.
The actual span/effective depth ratio can now be calculated from the rib layout shown in Figure 13.
If the actual span/effective depth ratio is bigger than the allowable span/effective depth ratio, the rib fails due to deflection.
Example:
End span condition = Continuous both ends (Designer to determine this from the layout drawing)
DLrib = 6.700 kN/m2 x 0.9 m per rib = 6.030 kN/m per rib
LLrib = 1.5 kN/m2 x 0.9 m per rib = 1.350 kN/m per rib
Rib Ultimate Load wrib = (1.2 x 6.030 kN/m) + (1.6 x 1.35 kN/m) = 9.396 kN/m per rib
Rib Serviceability load wrib = (1.1 x 6.030 kN/m) + (1.0 x 1.35 kN/m) = 7.983 kN/m per rib
y1 + y 2 As.req 1
The service stress fs = 0.87(450 MPa) x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y4 As.prov βb
Allowable span/effective depth ratio = (Modification factor) x (Basic span/effective depth ratio)
Where:
47
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
This is done by taking the width and the thickness of the rib into consideration using the following formula:
bh3
Ix =
12
The short-term modulus of elasticity for the specified strength of the concrete can be determined using Table 8 (Refer to Step 27).
For long term deflections, a conservative assumption is that the modulus of elasticity is only half the value given in Table 8.
Long term deflections can then be determined using one of the following equations:
5wl4
Truly simply supported beam δ =
384EcIx
wl4
Beam with one end continuous δ = 0.0099
EcIx
wl4
Beam with both ends continuous δ = 0.0068
EcIx
The recommended limit to prevent damage to finishes and partitions is the span divided by 250 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.2.1).
If the calculated actual long-term deflection is less that the recommended limit, then the beam is okay.
Example:
5wl4 0.0068 x (7.983 kN/m) x (5000 mm)4 0.0068 x (7.983 x 103 kN/mm) x (5000 mm)4
δ = 0.0068 = = = 2.0 mm
384EcIx (14 x 103 GPa) x (1.235 x 109 mm4) (14 x 10-6 kN/mm2) x (1.235 x 109 mm4)
Span 5000 mm
Recommended limit = = = 20.0 mm
250 250
48
Coffers and Troughs
Only the reinforcement required for the short span needs to be determined.
The same reinforcement configuration can then be applied to the ribs in the long span.
Example:
The rib in the short direction is continuous both ends (Refer to Figure 16, Section A - A)
Span Length ‘L’ = lesser of (3600 mm + 379 mm) = 3979 mm and (3600 mm + 700 mm + 700 mm) = 5000 mm.
The reinforcing configuration, type, size, and amount or reinforcing steel detailed, will vary between designers and detailers.
It is recommended that reinforcing steel is detailed using the minimum amount of bars and lengths of bars.
Using many different bar lengths and configurations will increase the risk of fixing errors and fixing time on site.
It is further recommended that bottom steel is detailed to pass the centre line of the supports by the anchorage length given in Rule 2.1 above.
In this case, Y16 reinforcing bars are used for bottom steel, therefore each reinforcing bar should pass the centre line of the supports by at
least 16 mm x 12 times the diameter = 192 mm. (Refer to Figure 16).
This same configuration is then accepted for both the short and long span of the ribs.
49
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
425
B
Continuous short
span ribs
1Y16 B (Each Rib)
400 x 400
columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
CL Support CL Support
5500
Support beams
B Coffers
Beam 22
A A
Beam Y
Beam W
C1 C2 C3 CL Coffers
900
CL Coffers
Continuous
short span
1Y16 B (Each Rib) B
ribs
12 x bar diameter 12 x bar diameter
= 192 mm = 192 mm
1400 Lx = 3600 1400
Beam Beam
Plan View
425
Section B - B
50
Coffers and Troughs
Provide R8 stirrups at a 250 mm spacing (From Step 41), along the full length of the short span rib.
For this example, no additional reinforcement will be provided at the top of each stirrup, other than the layer of mesh Ref 245.
In addition to the bottom tension reinforcement, Figure 17 shows the reinforcing stirrups for the short span ribs.
16R8-250 Stirrups
(Each Rib)
B
425
B
Continuous short
span ribs
1Y16 B (Each Rib)
400 x 400
columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
CL Support CL Support
5500
Support beams
B Coffers
Beam 22
16R8-250 Stirrups
(Each Rib)
A A
Beam Y
Beam W
C1 C2 C3 CL Coffers
900
CL Coffers
Continuous
short span B
1Y16 B (Each Rib)
ribs
12 x bar diameter 12 x bar diameter
= 192 mm = 192 mm
1400 Lx = 3600 1400
Beam Beam
Plan View
16R8-250 Stirrups
425
(Each Rib)
Section B - B
Figure 17 – Bottom Tension Reinforcement And Stirrups For Short Span Ribs
51
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Therefore, install 1 layer of mesh Ref 245 over the complete area of Coffer beams and ribs to control cracking and to act as nominal reinforcement
within the Coffer slab areas.
In addition to the bottom tension reinforcement and stirrups, Figure 18 shows the mesh reinforcement..
425
B
Continuous short
span ribs
1Y16 B (Each Rib)
400 x 400
columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
CL Support CL Support
5500
Support beams
B Coffers
Beam 22
Me
sh R
ef 2 16R8-250 Stirrups
45
(Each Rib)
A A
Beam W
Beam Y
C1 C2 C3 CL Coffers
900
CL Coffers
Continuous
short span B
ribs 1Y16 B (Each Rib)
Plan View
Mesh Ref 245
16R8-250 Stirrups
425
(Each Rib)
Section B - B
Figure 18 – Bottom Reinforcement, Stirrups And Mesh For Short Span Ribs
52
Coffers and Troughs
Example:
Tension rebar = 1 No. Y12 reinforcing bar at a spacing of 900 mm (From Step 44)
The rib in the short direction is continuous both ends (Refer to Figure 19, Section A - A)
Span Length ‘L’ = lesser of (3600 mm + 379 mm) = 3979 mm and (3600 mm + 700 mm + 700 mm) = 5000 mm.
The reinforcing configuration, type, size, and amount or reinforcing steel detailed, will vary between designers and detailers.
It is recommended that reinforcing steel is detailed using the minimum amount of bars and lengths of bars.
Using many different bar lengths and configurations will increase the risk of fixing errors and fixing time on site.
At least 20% of the top tension reinforcing steel should be continuous through the spans.
It is recommended that the remaining 80% of the top reinforcing steel extends to within 0.25L or 45 x bar diameter from the face of the support,
whichever is the larger length.
In this case, 1 No. Y12 is used for the top reinforcing steel.
This reinforcing bar should extend past the face of the support by the larger of (0.25 x 3979 mm) = 995 mm and (45 x 12 mm diameter) = 540 mm.
Extend the reinforcing bar 995 mm (Rounded off = 1000 mm) past the face of the support (Refer to Figure 19).
53
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
425
B
Continuous Short
Span Ribs
1Y16 B (Each Rib)
400 x 400
Columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
CL Support CL Support
5500
Support beams
B
Beam 22
Me
sh R
1Y12 T (Each Rib) ef 2 16R8-250 Stirrups 1Y12 T (Each Rib)
45
(Each Rib)
Coffers
A A
Beam W
Beam Y
C1 C2 C3 CL Coffers
900
CL Coffers
Continuous
short span B
ribs 1Y16 B (Each Rib)
12 x bar diameter 12 x bar diameter
= 192 mm = 192 mm
1400 Lx = 3600 1400
Beam Beam
Plan View
16R8-250 Stirrups
425
(Each Rib)
Section B - B
Figure 19 – Top And Bottom Reinforcement, Stirrups And Mesh For Short Span Ribs
Use the same reinforcing steel configuration for the ribs in both directions, except where there are major differences in span lengths.
Work through Steps 1 to 50 until all the beams and ribs are designed.
54
Coffers and Troughs
55
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Step 1 Fill the complete slab with Troughs and internal beams while leaving beams around the perimeter
Step 2 Identify all the load bearing walls that are supported on top of the slab
Identify and determine the
Trough support beam and slab
layout of the Trough slab Step 3 Identify the columns and beams
and beams
Step 4 Determine the Trough lengths
identification
Step 6 Identify the beam with the worst-case deflection scenario based on the L/d values given in Table 4
Determine thickness of the
Step 7 Determine the required slab thickness due to deflection
Trough slab and beams
Step 8 Determine the Trough height and structural topping thickness
Step 16 Determine the maximum mid-span bending moment for the beam
Determine the mid-span Step 17 Determine the moment of resistance for the beam
moments and the tension
Trough support beam design
reinforcing steel required Step 18 Determine the area of tension reinforcing steel required for the beam at mid-span
Step 19 Select the spacing and type of tension reinforcing steel to be used for mid-span bending
Step 23 Determine the maximum support bending moment for the beam
Determine the support
moments and the tension Step 24 Determine the area of tension reinforcing steel required for the beam at the support
reinforcing steel required
Step 25 Select the spacing and type of tension reinforcing steel to be used for support bending
Check the deflections for Step 26 Check the deflections based on the basic allowable span
the support beam Step 27 Calculate the actual long-term deflections
Step 28 Steel detailing of mid-span tension reinforcing steel for the support beams
Steel detailing of the Step 29 Steel detailing of the stirrups for the support beams of the Trough slab
support beam
Step 30 Steel detailing of beam tension reinforcing steel over supports and nominal top reinforcing steel at mid-span
Identify the Trough Step 31 Rib design - Identify and name the Trough portions between the beams
configuration and the
Step 32 Select a Trough portion and identify specific the details from the drawing
minimum structural topping
thickness Step 33 Determine the minimum structural topping thickness due to deflection, for selected Trough height
Determine the loads acting
Step 34 Determine the self-weight of the Trough slab and imposed loads on the Trough slab
on the Trough slab
Step 35 Determine the span end conditions and maximum moments of the Trough slab
Determine the end
conditions, mid-span Step 36 Determine the moment of resistance of each Trough rib
moment resistance and the
tension reinforcing steel Step 37 Determine the area of tension reinforcing steel required for each rib at mid-span
Trough ribs/slab design
Check deflections for the Step 45 Check the deflections based on the basic allowable span of the ribs
Trough slab Step 46 Calculate the actual long-term deflections of the ribs
Step 47 Steel detailing of midspan tension reinforcing steel for the ribs
Step 48 Steel detailing of the stirrups for the ribs of the Trough slab
Steel detailing of the
Trough slab Step 49 Steel detailing of the nominal reinforcing steel at mid-span and the supports for the Trough slab
Step 50 Steel detailing of tension reinforcing steel at the support and the nominal top reinforcing steel at mid-span
56
Coffers and Troughs
Legend
TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Trough slab
design
If Mr in Step 17 is
less than imposed Determine the
Steel detailing of
moment, refer loads acting on the
the Trough slab
back to Step 7 & support beams
(Steps 47 to 50)
increase beam (Steps 13 to 15)
depth
steel required
span & supports
(Steps 20 to 22)
(Steps 42 to 44)
Identify Coffer
Determine the
configuration & the Steel detailing of
loads acting on the
minimum structural the support beam
Trough slab
topping thickness (Steps 28 to 30)
(Step 34)
(Steps 31 to 33)
A
B
D
1500/750/500
0
C 0 /5 0
/7 5
00 Side View B - B
15
A
B
Trough Middle Section - 3D View
Figure 20 – Side Views and 3D View Of Troughs
58
Coffers and Troughs
8 A
B 1
C
00
0 0 /5 D
10 A 1000/500
B Side View B - B
59
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Scenario 1:
The slab is only supported along 2 of the 4 edges.
Scenario 2:
The length of the longer side of the slab exceeds three times the length of the shorter side, as stated in SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.4.3.
The Trough design procedure given in this Concrete Design Guide is based on a worked example, where the following assumptions have been made:
Design Example
The Trough design procedure given in this Concrete Design Guide is based on an example where the following assumptions have been made:
The architect has requested a Trough alternative to a solid slab solution, which will be significantly lighter in weight and more economical.
The floor slabs are to be designed for a sports facility in Johannesburg.
The Trough slab is to be supported on 450 mm x 450 mm columns
The imposed loads on the floor slab are based on a “sub-category B5” (Refer to SANS 10160-2, Table 1 for the different categories and specific
uses).
A concrete compressive strength of 30 MPa and a tensile reinforcing steel strength of 450 MPa is being used throughout the remainder of the
building and should be used for the floor slabs where possible.
To cater for fire resistance, the floor slabs must be designed in accordance with the SABS 0100 -1, Clause 7.
A portion of the Trough slab, described in the abovementioned example, is shown in Figure 22 below.
The worked example mainly concentrates on the design of Beam B1 and the Trough slab between Beams A1 and C1.
Other portions of the Trough slab shown in Figure 22 will only be discussed for clarification purposes as and when necessary.
K L M N
12375 6175 6200
450 x 450
Columns Troughs Internal support External support
beams beams
450
Beam A1 Beam A2
1
Beam E1
Beam G1
Beam F1
3575
4250
900
2 Beam B1 Beam B2
Beam E2
Beam G2
Beam F2
4550
3650
900
3 Beam C1 Beam C2
Beam E3
Beam G3
Beam F3
4250
3575
4
900
Beam D3
Beam D1 Beam D2
Beam H1
Beam G4
60
Coffers and Troughs
Prior to starting with Step 1, the designer should familiarize himself/herself with the architectural drawings.
Step 1: Fill the complete deck with Troughs and internal support beams while leaving beams around the perimeter of the floor slab.
Regardless of the support configuration and dimensions, the designer should start by inserting 900 mm wide concrete beams between all the
internal column/wall supports as shown in Figure 22.
The width of the internal support beams can be anything from 500 mm upwards.
The designer should leave external support beams around the perimeter of the structure.
The width of these external support beams must be determined by the designer to suit the architectural and structural requirements and should
initially be at least the width of the supporting columns.
The width and depth of each support beam must be verified, taking into consideration all applied dead and imposed loads.
Then, detail 900 mm wide Troughs between all the concrete beams in the short span direction (The Trough lengths of 3650 mm and 3575 mm,
shown in Figure 22, will be adjusted by changing the width of the support beams as per Step 4).
It is good practice to have the Troughs line up from one slab to the other to ensure easy installation and continuity of reinforcing bars from rib to rib.
The designer may deviate from Step 1 if a different Trough layout is preferred due to other influences such as point loads on the slab.
Step 2: Identify all the load bearing walls that are supported on top of the slab.
In addition to supporting the required design loads, the designer should consider that the slab may also be required to support additional loads
such as from load bearing walls on top of the slab.
Arrange all the Troughs such that there are ‘load bearing wall beams’ below each load bearing wall that is drawn on top of the slab (For example,
Beam D3 shown in Figure 22).
Initially, allow for a 900 mm internal support beam directly below each load bearing wall.
The width and depth of each support beam may be adjusted to suit architectural and structural requirements and must be verified, taking into
consideration all the applied dead and imposed loads.
The columns may be identified using the grid lines (Column K1, Column L1, etc.) as shown in Figure 22.
These references identify each concrete element that is being designed and will be used when scheduling the reinforcing steel.
61
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Table 18 gives the preferred combinations of Trough units to make up the required overall Trough lengths.
Note:
The use of the M500 Trough units is not preferred and are omitted from Table 18.
Trough Units
Trough
Length (mm) E500 E1000 M750 M1500
1000 2 - - -
1500 1 1 - -
1750 2 - 1 -
2000 - 2 - -
2250 1 1 1 -
2500 2 - - 1
2750 - 2 1 -
3000 1 1 - 1
3250 2 - 1 1
3500 - 2 - 1
3750 1 1 1 1
4000 2 - - 2
4250 - 2 1 1
4500 1 1 - 2
Example:
There are many possible combinations that can be used to make up the required Trough lengths.
In addition to using Table 18, preferably contact your nearest Form-Scaff branch to find out what standard sizes are available.
From Figure 22, the preliminary Trough length required between Beam B1 and Beam C1 is 3650 mm
From Table 18, the preferred combination of (2 No. E1000 units) + (1 No. M1500 unit) = 3500 mm
The inner widths of Beams B1 and C1 must now be altered to accommodate the fixed Trough dimensions
Therefore, 900 mm + 75 mm = new beam width of 975 mm for both Beams B1 and C1
The Trough length of 3500 mm now fits between the Beams B1 and C1 (Refer to Figure 23).
From Figure 22, the preliminary Trough length required between Beam A1 and Beam B1 is 3575 mm
From Table 18, the preferred combination of (2 No. E1000 units) + (1 No. M1500 unit) = 3500 mm
Assume for this example that the external Beam A1 must remain 450 mm wide
The width of the internal Beam B1 must now be altered to accommodate the fixed Trough dimensions
Add the remaining 75 mm to the side of Beam B1 (on the Beam A1 side of Beam B1)
Then, Beam A1 has a width of 450 mm and Beam B1 has a width of 975 mm + 75 mm = 1050 mm with the 3500 mm long Troughs in between
(Refer to Figure 23).
Apply the same principle to determine the widths of the Beams C1 and D1.
62
Coffers and Troughs
K L M N
L = 12375 L = 6175 L = 6200
450 x 450
Columns 2 No. E1000 Trough units Internal support External support
+ 1 No. M1500 Trough unit beams beams
450
Beam A1 Beam A2
1
Beam E1
Beam G1
Beam F1
L = 4250
3500
E1000
1050
2 Beam B1 Beam B2
L = 4550
Beam E2
Beam G2
Beam F2
M1500
3500
1050
3 Beam C1 Beam C2
E1000
L = 4250
Beam E3
Beam G3
Beam F3
3500
Load bearing wall on
load bearing wall beam
900
Beam D3
Beam D1 Beam D2
Beam G4
Beam H1
Figure 23 – Plan Layout Of Trough Slab With Adjusted Widths Of Support Beams
It is recommended that the width of the internal support beams are increased as opposed to the external support beams around the perimeter,
as the internal support beams are more likely to carry larger loads.
Refer to Figure 23 for the plan layout of the Trough slab showing the adjusted widths of the internal support beams.
In some instances, if the beams are carrying small loads, it may be possible to reduce the width of the internal beams by 500 mm and then the
length of the Troughs can be increased by 500 mm.
In contrast, if the beams are carrying large loads, it may be necessary to widen the internal concrete beams and reduce the overall length of the
Troughs.
In most cases, the spacing does not work out exactly as per Trough and Decking Panel dimensions, thus the designer is required to move the
Troughs around on the layout to try and get the supports as central as possible between two Trough configurations.
The internal beam widths should be 1500 mm, 1294 mm or 900 mm where possible to accommodate the Decking Panel sizes of 1425 mm,
1219 mm and 825 mm.
When this is not possible, infills or non-standard equipment will be required to form the soffit of the support beams which will have cost
implications and increase the erection time of the falsework.
63
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The identification of the support beam with the worst-case deflection is achieved by applying the following formula:
Where:
The Span Length ‘L’ is the distance between the centre lines of the supports (Refer to Figure 23).
For each beam configuration, determine the Span Length ‘L’ of the relevant beam (using the drawing) and select the relevant ratio from Table 4.
Basic span/effective depth ratio from Table 4 = 24 (Beam with one end continuous)
For beams longer than 10 m, the values obtained in Table 4 should be multiplied by 10/span to prevent damages to finishes and partitions as per
SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.2.2.
Basic span/effective depth ratio from Table 4 = 24 (Beam with one end continuous)
The largest value of ‘d’ will then be used to determine the slab thickness for the whole slab.
Note:
In the case of a cantilever beam, the Span Length ‘L’ is the distance between the centre line of the support and the end of the cantilever beam.
Required slab thickness ‘t’ = effective depth ‘d’ + cover to reinforcement + half the diameter of the main reinforcing bars selected + the diameter of
the stirrups (diameterstirrup)
Normally the slab thickness remains constant over the complete floor area, except where a definitive difference between spans or loads occur and
the designer opts for a thicker or thinner slab in a specific portion due to structural or financial constraints.
64
Coffers and Troughs
The minimum structural topping thickness for each of the Trough slab heights is illustrated in Figure 24.
brib.ave brib.ave
Trough size
8
900
CL Rib CL Rib
The minimum structural topping thickness for each of the Trough sizes is given in Table 19.
Clear Minimum
Clear Distance Rib Width At Average Rib Rib Width At
Distance Structural
Trough Size Between Ribs Top Width Bottom
Between Ribs Topping
(mm) At Top 'brib.top' 'brib.ave' 'brib.bot'
At Bottom Thickness
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm) (mm)
The Trough height and structural topping thickness may be determined using in the following example:
Example:
Plan floor area = 13 No. Troughs x 0.9 m x 3.5 m = 40.95 m2 (Number of Troughs from Figure 23).
The following scenarios may be used to determine the most economical design.
65
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Note:
From above, it can be seen that Scenario 3 is the most economical design.
If Scenario 3 is used instead of a solid slab, the concrete and reinforcing will be reduced by 54.0% in the Trough slab portions.
If a solid slab was used as opposed to a Coffer slab, the volume of concrete for a 700 mm thick flat slab = 40.95 m2 x 0.700 m = 28.665 m3.
All the support beams are generally the same thickness as the Trough portion of the slab.
When considering the overall slab, the selection of a bigger Trough size may result in more concrete and reinforcing steel being used due to the
size of all the beams and ribs.
A lighter structure means reduced reinforcement which also leads to a more economical design.
Also, consider the height restrictions when using a bigger Trough size.
The assumption is made that the weight per Trough portion is directly related to the weight per square metre of Trough slab.
Example:
Trough height + structural topping = 625 mm Trough + 75 mm structural topping (From Step 8, Scenario 3)
Allow for a 50 mm thick non-structural screed with the same density as concrete.
Displacement for voided plan area = ((1 No. M1500 ) + (2 No. E1000)) = ((1 x 0.555 m3) + (2 x 0.318 m3)) = 1.191 m3 per Trough
Therefore, the self weight of the Trough portion of the slab = 0.372 m3/m2 x 25 kN/m3 = 9.300kN/m2 in plan.
66
Coffers and Troughs
The only difference is that there is no deduction due to Trough displacement and the full depth of the Trough and structural topping is taken
into consideration when calculating the beam depth and self -weight per m2 in plan.
Example:
Allow for a 50 mm thick non-structural screed with the same density as concrete.
Concrete volume per support beam = (0.700 m + 0.050) x (1.0 m x 1.0 m in plan) = 0.750 m3/m2 in plan
Step 11: Determine the imposed loading acting on the slab and support beam.
The designer needs to identify the specific use for every section of the building.
Refer to SANS 10160-2, Table 1 for the different categories and specific uses.
The same building may have several different uses in different portions of the building.
The designer can choose to cater for the worst-case scenario throughout the building, but that may lead to an uneconomical design.
Step 12: Determine the loads acting on the slab and beam.
For the slab and support beam design, use the ultimate limit state factors as specified in SANS 10160-1, Table 3.
Permanent actions (Dead Load) such as the self-weight of the beam or slab itself, screed, tiles, etc. are multiplied by a partial factor of 1.2.
Variable actions (Live Load) such as the imposed loads acting on the floor or roof are multiplied by a partial factor of 1.6.
These are then added together to determine a design load as shown below.
Example:
Trough height + structural topping + non-structural screed = 625 mm Trough + 75 mm structural topping + 50 mm screed = 750 mm
(From Step 8, Scenario 3)
Assume that the building consists of an open sports facility, thus the imposed load = 5.0 kN/m2 (Refer SANS 10160-2, Table 1)
wslab = (1.2 x 9.300 kN/m2) + (1.6 x 5.0 kN/m2) = 19.160 kN/m2 in plan
wbeam = (1.2 x 18.750 kN/m2) + (1.6 x 5.0 kN/m2) = 30.500 kN/m2 in plan.
67
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The designer needs to isolate a beam and determine the Trough configuration associated with that specific beam.
Because the Troughs are acting as one-way spanning beams, it can be assumed that half the length of the Troughs between two support
beams, act on each support or beam.
Example:
Length of Trough slab acting on Beam B1 from the Beam A1 side = 3500 mm ÷ 2 = 1750 mm
Length of Trough slab acting on Beam B1 from the Beam C1 side = 3500 mm ÷ 2 = 1750 mm
Therefore the total portion of Troughs acting on Beam B1 = 1750 mm + 1750 mm = 3500 mm.
K L
L = 12375
450
Beam A1
1
Beam E1
Beam F1
L = 4250
3500
1750
E1000
1050
2 Beam B1
1750
L = 4550
Beam E2
Beam F2
M1500
3500
3 Beam C1
E1000
1050
Step 14: Determine the impact of Trough slabs acting on the support beam.
The layout for the Troughs and beams should look similar to the layout shown in Figure 25.
Example:
Total load from Trough slab = 19.160 kN/m2 x 3.5 m = 67.060 kN/m
68
Coffers and Troughs
Example:
This is the load that is used to determine the moments and area of steel required for bending.
Step 16: Determine the maximum mid-span bending moment for the beam.
There are 4 scenarios to consider if the span of the beams differ by 15% or less:
wl2
Mu.mid =
8
wl2
Mu.mid =
10
wl2
Mu.mid =
2
If the span of the beams differ by more than 15%, a rational beam analysis should be done.
Example:
49
69
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The effective depth ‘d’ is the depth from external face of the compression zone of the beam to the centre of the tension reinforcement as stated in
SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.3.
Assume that the redistribution of moments does not to exceed 10%, thus K = 0.156 (Refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1).
To determine the moment of resistance, apply the formula Mr = Kbd2fcu (Refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1).
Example:
Mr = Kbd2fcu = 0.156 x 1050 mm x (638 mm)2 x 30 Mpa = 0.156 x 1.05 m x (0.638 m)2 x 30 x 103 kN/m2 = 2000.214 kN.m.
70
Coffers and Troughs
This is achieved by checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.mid
K = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcing steel is required in addition to the tension reinforcing steel.
If compression reinforcing steel is required, the designer should consider increasing the width and/or depth of the beam as it is not ideal to
design for compression reinforcing steel.
If the slab depth is changed, go back to Step 7 and reassess the design.
This Concrete Design Guide does not deal with the design for compression reinforcing steel at mid-span.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement at mid-span is determined using the following equation:
Mu.mid
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a rectangular beam is given in Table 6.
fy = 450 MPa for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
z = lesser of 0.95 x 638 mm = 606 mm and 638 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.118 ÷ 0.9)) = 539 mm
As.min = 0.13 (From Table 6) x (Ac ÷ 100) = 0.13 x (735.0 x 103 mm2 ÷ 100) = 955.5 mm2
71
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
For this example, assume a spacing of 170 mm (At this stage, the designer must assume the spacing of the reinforcing bars).
The assumed spacing is then used to determine the number of reinforcing bars that will fit across the width of the support beam.
After the number of reinforcing bars is determined, the actual spacing can be calculated.
The required cross-sectional area per reinforcing bar can be determined by dividing the total reinforcing steel area required (As.req) by the number
of reinforcing bars provided.
This cross-sectional area must be compared to the values given in Table 7 to determine the reinforcing bar diameter that will meet the minimum
cross-sectional area requirements.
First, check that the assumed and calculated spacing of the reinforcing bars is smaller than the maximum spacing allowed for the specific section
y 1 + y2 As.req 1
by calculating the service stress fs = 0.87fy x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y 4 As.prov βb
Where:
βb = ratio of resistance moment at mid-span obtained from the redistributed maximum moments diagram to that obtained from the maximum
moments diagram before redistribution = 1.0
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1; SANS 10160-1, Table 3, and SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1)
Then, check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4).
Example:
Number of reinforcing bars = b – (2 x cover) ÷ spacing + 1 bar = 1050 mm – (2 x 30 mm) ÷ 170 mm = 5.8 bars + 1 bar = 6.8 rounded up to 7 bars
Actual spacing = b – (2 x cover) ÷ (number of bars – 1 bar) = 1050 mm – (2 x 30 mm) ÷ (7 – 1) = 165 mm rounded down to 160 mm
Required cross-sectional area per reinforcing bar = As.req ÷ number of reinforcing bars = 7191 mm2 ÷ 7 = 1027 mm2 per reinforcing bar
From Table 7 it can be seen that 1 No. Y32 reinforcing bar has a cross sectional area of 804 mm2 which is less than the required cross-sectional
area of 1027 mm2 per reinforcing bar
The total area As.prov = 9 No. x 804 mm2 = 7236 mm2, which is greater than 7191 mm2, therefore reinforcing steel is okay.
Check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4)
Actual spacing = b – (2 x cover) ÷ (number of bars – 1 bar) = 1050 mm – (2 x 30 mm) ÷ (9 – 1) = 124 mm rounded down to 120 mm
Therefore, to cater for the bending moment, use 9 No. Y32 reinforcing bars at a spacing of 120 mm.
The designer can choose a larger spacing than the spacing calculated above and re-check the diameter of the reinforcing bars required.
To determine the most economical reinforcing steel, it all depends on the maximum spacing allowed for specific diameters of reinforcing bars.
72
Coffers and Troughs
Each stirrup has 2 vertical legs which provides a position in each corner for 1 main longitudinal bar.
The number of bars in the beam is divided by 2 to determine the number of stirrups.
If the total number of main longitudinal tension bars is an uneven number, 1 No. tension bar runs in the middle of the beam without being in the
corner of a stirrup.
Example:
Tension reinforcing steel = 9 No. Y32 bars at a spacing of 120 mm (From Step 19)
Number of stirrups = 9 No. Y32 ÷ 2 tension bars per stirrup = 4.5 No. stirrups rounded down to 4 No. stirrups type A, B, C and D (Refer to Figure 26)
The designer may choose any preferred stirrup shape and configuration to suit the main reinforcing steel, provided that the minimum requirement for
shear is met
Due to the congestion of the hooks at the top of the stirrups in Example 2, the stirrup configuration in Example 1 may be preferred.
Concrete
Stirrups
beam
A B B C C D D A
Example 1
Concrete
Stirrups Clips
beam
A B B C C D D A
53
73
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
To simplify, conservatively assume that the beams are simply supported to determine the reaction forces at each support.
To check the maximum shear strength of a beam, the reaction forces at the internal support must be determined.
If both supports are under continuous beams, both supports must be analysed and the worst case shear force is used in the design calculations.
The design shear stress ‘v’ at any cross-section of the beam should not exceed a value of the lesser of fcu or 4.75 MPa. (Refer to SABS
0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1)
V
Design shear stress v = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1)
bd
(25) ( b d ) (400
d )
0.75 fcu ⅓ 100As ⅓ ¼
Maximum design shear stress of concrete vc = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2)
ym v
In the above equation, it is generally accepted that the value of 0.75 may be increased to 0.79 for design purposes.
In the above equation, it is recommended that the value of 0.75 is increased to 0.79 for design purposes
( b d ) should not be taken as greater than 3 (refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2)
100As
Where
v
The design shear stress must be less than the maximum design shear stress, if not, either additional shear reinforcement must be added or the
cross-section of the beam should be altered.
To determine the required ratio of shear reinforcement to rebar spacing, apply the following equation:
Where:
fyv is the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R16 = 250 MPa = 250 N/mm2)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3)
Example:
Design shear force V = 2 x 613.088 kN = 1226.176 kN, assuming that lengths are the same on either side of the internal support.
The designer should do a proper beam analysis to determine the reaction forces on each support, preferably using a specialist software package
Maximum shear stress vmax = smaller of 0.75 30 = 4.108 MPa and 4.75 MPa
Partial safety factor for materials for shear strength without shear reinforcement and shear taken by concrete in combination with shear reinforcement
γm = 1.40 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 3.3.3.2)
54
74
Coffers and Troughs
To determine the required ratio of shear reinforcement to the reinforcing bar spacing, apply the following equation:
The spacing should not exceed 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcement.
The initial assumption is made that the spacing of the stirrups is just below 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcing steel.
If the assumed spacing of the stirrups is found to be insufficient, the spacing must be reduced accordingly.
If the following equation is true, then the spacing is okay, if not, reduce the spacing:
Where:
fyv = the characteristic shear strength of the link reinforcement (R16 = 250 MPa)
Example:
Asv
= 6.324 (From Step 21)
sv
Provide 4 No. R16 stirrups at 250 mm spacing along the full length of the beam as per Figure 28.
75
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Scenario 1:
External support on continuous beam
Mu.sup = 0
Scenario 2:
1st Internal support on continuous beam
wl2
Mu.sup = –
9
Scenario 3:
2nd Internal support on continuous beam
wl2
Mu.mid = –
12
Scenario 4:
Simply supported beam
Mu.mid = 0
If the span of the beams differ by more than 15%, a rational beam analysis should be done.
Example:
Beam is continuous one end only (Determined from the layout drawing, refer to Figure 25)
Scenarios 1 and 2 are both applicable, but since the moment on the external support is 0, for this example, only design for the 1st internal
support on the continuous beam (Scenario 2)
76
Coffers and Troughs
This is done be checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.sup
K= (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcement is required in addition to the tension reinforcement.
If this is the case, the designer should increase the width of the beam as it is not ideal to design for compression reinforcement.
This Design Guide will not discuss the design for compression reinforcement at mid-span.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement is determined using the following equation:
Mu.sup
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a rectangular beam is given in Table 6.
Example:
fy = 450 MPa for hot-rolled high-yield steel (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, Table 3)
z = lesser of 0.95 x 638 mm = 360 mm and 638 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.131 ÷ 0.9)) = 525 mm
77
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The designer can assume the spacing and number of reinforcing bars to be the same as the spacing for the reinforcement at mid-span as
determined in Step 19 to simplify the fixing of the reinforcing bars.
The required cross-sectional area of each reinforcing bar (As.req) can be determined by dividing the total required area of reinforcement by the
number of reinforcing bars provided.
To meet the minimum cross-sectional area requirements, this cross-sectional area must be compared to the values given in Table 7 to determine
the diameter of the reinforcing bar required.
First, check that the assumed and calculated spacing of the reinforcing bars is smaller than the maximum spacing allowed for the specific section by
y 1 + y2 As.req 1
calculating the service stress fs = 0.87fy x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y4 As.prov βb
Where:
βb = ratio of resistance moment at mid-span obtained from the redistributed maximum moments diagram to that obtained from the maximum
moments diagram before redistribution = 1.0
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1; SANS 10160-1, Table 3, and SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1)
Then, check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4).
Example:
Required cross-sectional area per reinforcing bar = As.req ÷ number of reinforcing bars = 8203 mm2 ÷ 9 = 912 mm2 per reinforcing bar
From Table 7, a Y32 reinforcing bar has a smaller cross-sectional area (804 mm2 ) than the required reinforcing bar area of 912 mm2
Increase the number of bars to increase the cross-sectional area of reinforcing steel to 9 No. Y32 bars plus 2 No. Y25 bars.
Bundle each outer Y32 reinforcing bar with 1 No. Y25 bar.
The total area As.prov = (9 No. bars x 804 mm2 ) + (2 No. bar x 491 mm2) = 8218 mm2 which is greater than 8203 mm2, therefore reinforcing steel is
okay
Check that the maximum reinforcing bar spacing is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs
Therefore, to cater for the moment, use 9 No. Y32 bars at a spacing of 120 mm plus 2 No. Y25 bundled bars (Refer to Figure 29).
The designer can choose a different spacing than the spacing calculated above and re-check the diameter of the reinforcing bars required.
To determine the most economical reinforcing steeI, it all depends on the maximum spacing allowed for specific diameters of reinforcing bars.
78
Coffers and Troughs
Serviceability Limit State Load = 1.1DL + 1.0LL (Refer to SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1).
The basic span/effective depth ratio value obtained from Table 4 must be modified with a modification factor that takes into account the amount of
tension reinforcement and the associated stresses when the allowable span/effective depth ratio is calculated.
The allowable span/effective depth ratio will then be the basic span/effective depth ratio multiplied by the calculated modification factor.
The actual span/effective depth ratio can now be calculated using the beam layout shown in Figure 25.
If the actual span/effective depth ratio is bigger than the allowable span/effective depth ratio, the beam fails due to deflection.
Example:
Assume end span condition = continuous one end only (Beam B1 from Figure 25)
Where:
DLbeam = 18.750 kN/m2 x 1.050 m wide = 19.688 kN/m (From Step 10)
LLbeam = 5.0 kN/m2 x 1.050 m wide = 5.250 kN/m (From Step 12)
Beam load = (1.1 x 19.688 kN/m) + (1.0 x 5.250 kN/m) = 26.907 kN/m
Slab Load w = (1.1 x 32.550 kN/m) + (1.0 x 17.500 kN/m) = 53.305 kN/m
Where:
Where:
The modification factor of 0.853 is smaller than 2.0, therefore take the modification factor as 0.853
Allowable span/effective depth ratio = (Modification factor) x (Basic span/effective depth ratio)
Where:
19.397 < 20.472 therefore the beam is okay. (Increase the beam width or depth if the actual > allowable)
Step 27: Calculate the actual long-term deflections of the support beams.
The designer needs to determine the Moment of Inertia for the cross-sectional area of the concrete beam.
This is done by taking the width and the thickness of the beam into consideration using the following formula:
bh3
Ix =
12
The short-term modulus of elasticity for the specified strength of the concrete can be determined from Table 8.
For long term deflections, a conservative assumption is that the modulus of elasticity is only half the value given in Table 8.
Long term deflections can then be determined using one of the following equations:
5wl4
Truly simply supported beam δ =
384EcIx
wl4
Beam with one end continuous δ = 0.0099
EcIx
wl4
Beam with both ends continuous δ = 0.0068
EcIx
The recommended limit to prevent damage to finishes and partitions is the span divided by 250 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.2.1).
If the calculated actual long-term deflection is less that the recommended limit, then the beam is okay.
Example:
wl4 0.0099 x (80.212 kN/m) x (12375 mm)4 0.0099 x (80.212 x 103 kN/mm) x (12375 mm)4
δ = 0.0099 = = = 44.322 mm
EcIx (14 x 103 GPa) x (30.013 x 109 mm4) (14 x 10-6 kN/mm2) x (30.013 x 109 mm4)
Span 12375 mm
Recommended limit = = = 49.5 mm
250 250
44.322 mm < 49.5 mm therefore the long-term deflection of the slab is okay.
If the long-term deflection exceeds the recommended limit, the excessive deflection may be offset by specifying a pre-camber for the beam.
80
Coffers and Troughs
From Rule 4.4, at the non-continuous end, 50% of the tension reinforcement should extend to the supports and terminate in an effective anchorage
as in Rule 2 above and the remainder should extend to within 0.05L of the centre line of the support
Number of reinforcing bars = 9 No. Y32 bars at a spacing of 120 mm (From Step 19)
In this case, 5 No. Y32 must extend past the centre line of the supports by at least 12 mm x 32 times the diameter = 384 mm
The support is not wide enough to accommodate this, thus ensure that there is at least 384 mm anchorage past the centre line of the support and
that the bend is located at least the cover distance of 30 mm away from the end of beam (For example, extend the two outermost bars on each face)
The remaining reinforcing bars must extend to within 0.05L of the centre line of the support
From Rule 1, Span Length ‘L’ = the lesser of (11925 mm + 638 mm) = 12563 mm and (11925 mm + 225 mm + 225 mm) = 12375 mm
The remaining reinforcing bars must extend to within (0.05 x 12375 mm) = 619 mm of the centre line of the supports.
Rule 4.1:
To balance the configuration of the reinforcing bars across the width of the support beam, increase the number of reinforcing bars from 2.7 to 4 bars
Rule 4.2:
Half the remainder of the reinforcing bars = (4 bars – 2 bars) = 2 No. bars
Therefore, 2 No. reinforcing bars, shall extend to within 0.2L of the centre line of internal supports, where:
These reinforcing bars must extend to within (0.2 x 12375 mm) = 2475 mm from the centre line of the supports.
Rule 4.3:
The remaining 2 No. reinforcing bars shall extend to within 0.1L of the centre line of supports
These reinforcing bars must extend to within (0.1 x 12375 mm) = 1238 mm from the centre line of the supports.
Note:
Although Rules 4.2 and 4.3 are generally applicable, due to the stirrup configuration, all the reinforcing bars should at least extend all the way up to
the inside face of the supports so that the bottom corners of the stirrups can be secured in position.
81
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Beam B1
L = 12375
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
A A
Beam B1
1050
Concrete Beam B1
Note:
Bar Mark 01 = Shape Code 37
700
01 02 01 02 01 02 01 02 01
9Y32-120 B
(As per rules in Step 28)
Section B - B
Provide R16 stirrups type A, B, C and D at a 250 mm spacing (From Step 22), along the full length of Beam B1 (Refer to Figure 25).
In addition to the bottom tension reinforcement, Figure 28 shows the reinforcing stirrups for Beam B1.
Beam B1
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
A A
Beam B1
Concrete Beam B1
A B B C C D D A
R16-250 Stirrups Type C R16-250 Stirrups Type D
01 02 01 02 01 02 01 02 01
9Y32-120 B
(As per rules in Step 28)
Section B - B
Tension reinforcement = 9 No. Y32 bars at a spacing of 120 mm plus 2 No. Y25 bundled bars (From Step 25)
L = lesser of (11925 mm + 638 mm) = 12563 mm and (11925 mm + 225 mm + 225 mm) = 12375 mm.
Rule 4.1:
To balance the configuration of the reinforcing bars across the width of the beam, increase the number of reinforcing bars from 1.8 to 2 bars
These 2 No. top reinforcing bars must be continuous through the spans.
Rule 4.2:
These 7 No. Y32 bars plus 2 No. Y25 bundled bars make up the 80% balance of the top reinforcing bars
Allow the remaining 7 No. reinforcing bars to extend past the face of the support by the larger of 0.25L or 45d from the face of the support
Therefore, extend the remaining 7 No. top reinforcing bars 3094 mm (3100 mm rounded up) past the face of the support.
Note:
To assist with the fixing of the reinforcing bars, it may be prudent to have the same number of top and bottom reinforcing bars
The 7 No. remaining top reinforcing bars may be made continuous, through the length of the beam, using a reduced reinforcing bar diameter
The designer can use any reduced reinforcing bar diameter because the minimum required area of steel is already in place
In this case, it would be the most economical to use 2 No. Y32 and 7 No. Y12 top reinforcing bars over the length of the beam.
To balance the configuration of the reinforcing bars across the width of the beam, increase the number of reinforcing bars from 1.8 to 2 bars
These 2 No. top reinforcing bars must terminate at the center line of the non-continuous support.
64
84
Coffers and Troughs
Beam B1
0.25L = 3100
B
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
A A
Beam B1
A B B C C D D A
R16-250 Stirrups Type C R16-250 Stirrups Type D
01 02 01 02 01 02 01 02 01
9Y32-120 B
(As per rules in Step 28)
Section B - B
PART 3 – Trough slab design – ribs and structural topping (Steps 31 to 50)
Step 31: Identify and name the Trough portions between the beams.
All the beams should be designed as per Steps 1 to 30, before starting the design of the Trough portions of the slab.
Identify all the Trough portions between the support beams, for example A1/B1, A2/B2, etc. as shown in Figure 30.
The identification of each Trough portion will be used as a cross reference during the design phase and later when scheduling the reinforcing steel.
K L M N
L = 12375 L = 6175 L = 6200
450 x 450
Columns Ribs between Troughs Internal support External support
(Ribs ‘X’) beams beams
450
Beam A1 Beam A2
1
Beam E1
Beam G1
Beam F1
le = 4250
3500
A1/B1 A2/B2
E1000
1050
2 Beam B1 Beam B2
le = 4250
Beam E2
Beam G2
Beam F2
M1500
3500
B1/C1 B2/C2
1050
3 Beam C1 Beam C2
E1000
le = 4250
Beam E3
Beam G3
Beam F3
3500
C1/D1 C2/D2
900
Beam D3
Beam D1 Beam D2
Beam G4
Beam H1
Step 32: Select a Trough portion and identify the specific details from the drawing.
Select a Trough portion, for example portion A1/B1 in Figure 30 and determine the Trough length, width of the support beams, effective length and
supporting conditions.
Example:
86
Coffers and Troughs
Example:
Refer to Figure 24 and Table 19 for the minimum structural topping thickness for the different Trough sizes.
Step 34: Determine the self-weight of the Trough slab and imposed loads on the Trough slab.
The self-weight and imposed loads acting on the Trough slab will be the same as determined in Steps 9 & 12.
Example:
Step 35: Determine the span end conditions and maximum moments of the Trough slab.
Every slab will have ribs as shown in Figure 30.
Table 20 may be used to determine the maximum moments and maximum shear loads, but it is advised that the designer verifies the results using
specialist beam analysis software.
Example:
wrib = 19.160 kN/m2 x 0.9 m per rib = 17.244 kN/m per rib
F = wl
Msup.outer = 0 kN.m
Msup.inner = -0.086Fl = – 0.086 x 17.244 kN x (4.250 m)2 = – 26.786 kN.m per rib
87
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The effective depth ‘d’ is the depth from external face of the compression zone of the beam to the centre of the tension reinforcement as stated in
SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.3.
The relevant cover to reinforcing steel must be chosen depending on the requirement of structure.
Assume the width of the rib to be the width at the bottom of the rib and not the width at the top of the rib where the rib and the structural topping
meets.
The width brib.bot of the rib used in the moment of resistance calculation will then always be taken as 180 mm (Refer to Figure 24).
Assume the redistribution of moments do not exceed 10%, therefore K = 0.156 (Refer SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1).
If the moment of resistance is substantially bigger that the actual maximum bending moments over the complete design, an option would be to
increase the concrete strength.
Example:
Stirrup = R8 (Assumed)
Mr = Kbd2fcu = 0.156 x 180 mm x (652 mm)2 x 30 MPa ÷ 1 000 000 = 0.156 x 0.180 m x (0.652 m)2 x 0.03 x 106 kN/m2 = 358.108 kN.m.
88
Coffers and Troughs
This is achieved by checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.mid
K= (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcing steel is required in addition to the tension reinforcing steel.
This Concrete Design Guide does not deal with the design for compression reinforcing steel.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement at mid-span is determined using the following equation:
Mu.mid
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a flanged beam with the web in tension is given in Table 12.
z = lesser of 0.95 x 652 mm = 360 mm and 652 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.012 ÷ 0.9)) = 619 mm
brib.ave = (brib.top + brib.bot) ÷ 2 = (336 mm + 180 mm) ÷ 2 = 258 mm (From Table 19)
As.min = 0.13 x Ac ÷ 100 = 0.13 x 180.6 x 103 ÷ 100 = 235 mm2 per rib
49
89
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
The diameter and spacing of the reinforcing bars must now be determined.
The ribs are spaced at 900 mm (As shown in Figure 30), and assuming that only 1 No. reinforcing bar is used per rib, a reinforcing bar spacing of
900 mm is accepted.
The total width of a rib at the bottom is 180 mm (From Table 19).
If it is not be possible to have only one reinforcing bar (due to the imposed moments), the designer can use more reinforcing bars, but the spacing
within the rib must be checked to ensure that there is adequate space for concrete to flow around the reinforcing bars.
The required cross-sectional area (As.eq ) per reinforcing bar can be determined by dividing the total area of reinforcing steel required per metre by
the number of reinforcing bars provided at a spacing of 900 mm.
Table 7 must be used to determine the diameter of the reinforcing bars that are required to meet the minimum cross-sectional area requirements.
The designer must now check that the assumed calculated spacing is smaller than the maximum spacing allowed for the specific section if more
than one reinforcing bar is required.
The maximum spacing of reinforcing bars is the smaller of 300 mm or 47000 ÷ fs (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.11.8.2.1.4).
(Note that this only applies to slabs and beams).
By default, the ribs aret spaced at 900 mm center to center which is allowed for in the reinforcement calculation.
y 1 + y2 As.req 1
The service stress fs = 0.87fy x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y 4 As.prov βb
Where:
βb = ratio of resistance moment at mid-span obtained from the redistributed maximum moments diagram to that obtained from the maximum
moments diagram before redistribution = 1.0
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1; SANS 10160-1, Table 3, and SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1).
Example:
Number of reinforcing bars = 1 No. per rib (Reinforcing bar spacing is not applicable because only 1 No. reinforcing bar is used)
As.prov = 314 mm2 which is greater than the required area of 235 mm2, therefore 1 No. Y20 reinforcing bar is sufficient to cater for the moment
By default, the spacing of 214 mm will not be applicable in the rib calculation due to the ribs being at a spacing of 900 mm centre to centre.
90
Coffers and Troughs
The number of stirrups is based on the number of longitudinal tension reinforcing bars present in the rib under consideration.
Each stirrup in the ribs has 2 vertical legs (As shown in Figure 31) which provides a central position at the bottom for 1 No. longitudinal tension
reinforcing bar.
The intervals or spacing at which the stirrups are positioned along the length of the rib, is based on the shear resistance required for the rib as
discussed in Step 40.
75
R8 Stirrup
700
625
Longitudinal tension reinforcing bar
180
Example:
The design shear stress ‘v’ at any x-section of the rib shall not exceed a value of the lesser of 0.75√(fcu) or 4.75 MPa
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1)
V
Design shear stress v = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.1)
bd
(25) ( b d ) (400
d )
0.75 fcu ⅓ 100As ⅓ ¼
Maximum design shear stress of concrete vc = (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2)
ym v
100As
shall not be taken as greater than 3. (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.2)
bvd
The design shear stress should be less than the maximum design shear stress, if not, additional shear reinforcing steel must be added.
The cross-section of a rib cannot be altered to allow for increased shear capacity as was the case in the design of the support beams.
To determine the required ratio of shear reinforcement to reinforcing bar spacing, apply the following equation:
Where:
fyv is the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3).
91
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Partial safety factor for materials for shear strength without shear reinforcement and shear taken by concrete in combination with shear
reinforcement ym = 1.40 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 3.3.3.2)
(The designer should prepare a proper beam analysis to determine the reaction forces on each support using specialist software packages)
V
Design shear stress v =
bd
Maximum shear stress vmax = smaller of 0.75 30 = 4.108 MPa and 4.75 MPa
As.prov = 1 No. Y16 reinforcing bar = 314 mm2 (From Step 38)
( ) (652400mm)
0.75 30 MPa ⅓ ⅓ ¼
vc = (0.187) = 0.288 MPa
1.4 25
The negative value is a further indication that no shear reinforcement is required and that the longitudinal tension reinforcement is sufficient to
cater for the shear.
92
Coffers and Troughs
The spacing should not exceed 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcement.
The initial assumption is made that the spacing of the stirrups is just below 0.75 times the effective depth of the reinforcing steel.
If the assumed spacing of the stirrups is found to be insufficient, the spacing must be reduced accordingly.
If the following equation is true, then the spacing is okay, if not, reduce the spacing:
fyv is the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement (R8 = 250 MPa)
(Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.4.1.3)
Example:
Thus number of legs = 1 No. stirrup x 2 legs per stirrup = 2 No. legs
Asv
= – 0.032 (From Step 40)
sv
Asv.req = – 0.032 x 450 mm = – 14.41 mm2. The area required cannot be less than 0, therefore accept R8 stirrups at a spacing of 450 mm
Step 42: Determine the area of nominal reinforcement at mid-span and at the supports for the Trough slab.
A single layer of mesh reinforcement should be provided to control cracking in the structural topping.
The mesh should have a cross-sectional area of at least 0.12% of the cross-sectional area of the topping, in each direction, and the spacing of
the bars in the mesh should not exceed half the centre to centre distance between the ribs.
(Refer to SABS 10100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.5.6.2.2).
Example:
As.mesh = 0.12 % x 67.5 x 103 mm2 = 81 mm2 per 900 mm wide structural topping over each rib
Referring to Table 13, Mesh Ref 193 = 98.4 mm2 > 81 mm2
53
93
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
This is achieved by checking the ‘K’ value with the applied bending moment, where:
Mu.sup
K= (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
bd2fcu
If K > 0.156, then compression reinforcing steel is required in addition to the tension reinforcing steel.
This Concrete Design Guide does not deal with the design for compression reinforcing steel.
Example:
The value of ‘z’ is the lesser of 0.95d and d x (0.5 + (0.25 – (K ÷ 0.9)) (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.3.4.1)
The required area of tension reinforcement is determined using the following equation:
Mu.sup
As.req =
0.87fyz
The area of tension reinforcing steel should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the beam.
The minimum percentage of reinforcing steel for a flanged beam is given in Table 14.
z = lesser of 0.95 x 652 mm = 619 mm and 652 x (0.5 + (0.25 – (0.008 ÷ 0.9)) = 646 mm
As.max > As.req > As.min therefore As.req = 176 mm2 per rib (Or every 900 mm center to center of ribs).
54
94
Coffers and Troughs
The diameter and spacing of the reinforcing bars must now be determined.
The designer can assume the spacing between top tensile reinforcing bars to be 900 mm centre to centre, because this is the spacing of the
ribs.
Compare the cross-sectional area determined in Step 43 to the values given in Table 7, to determine the minimum diameter of the reinforcing
bars required.
Note:
If there is a marginal shortfall of top reinforcement, the mesh reinforcing in the structural topping should be taken into account, as calculated
in Step 42.
Example:
As.req = 176 mm2 per 900 mm rib spacing (From Step 43) due to the minimum cross-sectional area of the concrete structural topping
As.req = 111 mm2 per 900 mm rib spacing (From Step 43) due to the actual support moment
As.mesh = 98.4 mm2 per 900 mm wide structural topping over each rib (From Step 42)
Therefore, the new area of steel required As.req.new = 176 mm2 – 98.4 mm2 = 77.6 mm2
From Table 7, 1 No. Y12 reinforcing bar with a cross-sectional area of 113 mm2 in the structural topping is sufficient
The total area As.prov = 98.4 mm2 + 113 mm2 = 211.4 mm2
The mesh reinforcing bar spacing of 200 mm for is larger than the maximum spacing of 193 mm.
In this case, the 1 No. Y12 provided (113 mm2) is larger than the actual area of steel required due to the moment (111 mm2), therefore the
spacing can be ignored.
95
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Serviceability Limit State Load = 1.1DL + 1.0LL (Refer to SANS 10160-1, clause 8.3.1.1).
The basic span/effective depth ratio value obtained from Table 4 must be modified with a modification factor that takes into account the amount of
tension reinforcement and the associated stresses when the allowable span/effective depth ratio is calculated.
The allowable span/effective depth ratio will then be the basic span/effective depth ratio multiplied by the calculated modification factor.
The actual span/effective depth ratio can now be calculated from the rib layout shown in Figure 30.
If the actual span/effective depth ratio is bigger than the allowable span/effective depth ratio, the rib fails due to deflection.
Example:
End span condition = Continuous one end over Beam B1 (Trough slab A1/B1 from Figure 30)
DLrib = 9.300 kN/m2 x 0.9 m per rib = 8.370 kN/m per rib
LLrib = 5.0 kN/m2 x 0.9 m per rib = 4.5 kN/m per rib
Rib Ultimate Load wrib.ult = (1.2 x 8.370 kN/m) + (1.6 x 4.5 kN/m) = 17.244 kN/m per rib
Rib Serviceability load wrib.ser = (1.1 x 8.37 kN/m) + (1.0 x 4.5 kN/m) = 13.707 kN/m per rib
y1 + y 2 As.req 1
The service stress fs = 0.87(450 MPa) x x x (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.3.1)
y3 + y4 As.prov βb
( ) ( )
Mu 26.786 x 106 N.mm
120 0.9 + 120 0.9 N/mm2 +
bd2 258 mm x (652 mm)2
The modification factor of 2.327 is larger than 2.0, therefore take the modification factor as 2.0
Allowable span/effective depth ratio = (Modification factor) x (Basic span/effective depth ratio)
Where:
96
Coffers and Troughs
This is done by taking the width and the thickness of the rib into consideration using the following formula:
bh3
Ix =
12
The short-term modulus of elasticity for the specified strength of the concrete can be determined using Table 8.
For long term deflections, a conservative assumption is that the modulus of elasticity is only half the value given in Table 8.
Long term deflections can then be determined using one of the following equations:
5wl4
Truly simply supported beam δ =
384EcIx
wl4
Beam with one end continuous δ = 0.0099
EcIx
wl4
Beam with both ends continuous δ = 0.0068
EcIx
Long term deflections can then be determined using the following formula:
The recommended limit to prevent damage to finishes and partitions is the span divided by 250 (Refer to SABS 0100-1 Ed.2.2, clause 4.3.6.2.1).
If the calculated actual long-term deflection is less that the recommended limit, then the beam is okay.
Example:
Rib Serviceability Load wrib = 13.707 kN/m per rib (From Step 45)
wl4 0.0099 x (13.707 kN/m) x (4250 mm)4 0.0099 x (13.707 x 103 kN/mm) x (4250 mm)4
δ = 0.0099 = = = 0.4 mm
EcIx (14 x 103 GPa) x (7.375 x 109 mm4) (14 x 10-6 kN/mm2) x (7.375 x 109 mm4)
Span 4250 mm
Recommended limit = = = 17.0 mm
250 250
97
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Only the reinforcement required for the short span needs to be determined.
The same reinforcement configuration can then be applied to the ribs in the long span.
Example:
The Trough section is non-continuous at Beam A1 and continuous over Beam B1 (From Figure 30)
L = lesser of (3500 mm + 652 mm) = 4152 mm and (3500 mm + (450 mm + 1050 mm) ÷ 2) = 5000 mm.
The reinforcing configuration, type, size, and amount or reinforcing steel detailed, will vary between designers and detailers.
It is recommended that reinforcing steel is detailed using the minimum amount of bars and lengths of bars.
Using many different bar lengths and configurations will increase the risk of fixing errors and fixing time on site.
It is further recommended that bottom steel is detailed to pass the centre line of the supports by the anchorage length given in Rule 2.1 above.
In this case, Y20 reinforcing bars are used for bottom steel, therefore each reinforcing bar should pass the centre line of the supports by at least
20 mm x 12 times the diameter = 240 mm.
98
Coffers and Troughs
700
B
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
Support beam
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
B Beam F1 Beam F2
CL Troughs
A A
900
Beam B1
Beam A1
CL Troughs
B Trough ribs
12 x bar diameter
= 240 mm
4250
CL Support CL Support
Plan View
700
Beam F1
Trough ribs
Section B - B
Provide R8 stirrups at a 450 mm spacing (From Step 41), along the full length of the Trough rib.
For this example, no additional reinforcement will be provided at the top of each stirrup, other than the layer of mesh Ref 193.
In addition to the bottom tension reinforcement, Figure 33 shows the reinforcing stirrups for the short span ribs.
700
B
1 No. reinforcing bar per
rib with a bend equivalent
to 12 x the bar diameter
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
extended past the centre
line of the support 450 x 450
columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
Support beam
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
B Beam F1 Beam F2
CL Troughs
A A
900
Beam B1
Beam A1
CL Troughs
B Trough ribs
CL Support CL Support
Plan View
700
Trough ribs
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
Section B - B
100 Figure 33 – Bottom Tension Reinforcement And Stirrups For Short Span Ribs
Coffers and Troughs
Therefore, install 1 layer of mesh Ref 193 over the complete area of Trough beams and ribs to control cracking and to act as nominal reinforcement
within the Trough slab areas.
In addition to the bottom tension reinforcement and stirrups, Figure 34 shows the mesh reinforcement.
700
B
1 No. reinforcing bar per
rib with a bend equivalent
to 12 x the bar diameter
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
extended past the centre
line of the support 450 x 450
columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
B Beam F1 Beam F2
3
f 19 CL Troughs
Re
sh
A Me A
900
Beam B1
Beam A1
CL Troughs
B Trough ribs
CL Support CL Support
Plan View
Trough ribs
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
Section B - B
101
COFFER AND TROUGH SLAB DESIGN
Example:
Tension rebar = 1 No. Y20 reinforcing bar at a spacing of 900 mm (From Step 38)
The Trough section is non-continuous at Beam A1 and continuous over Beam B1 (From Figure 30)
L = lesser of (3500 mm + 652 mm) = 4152 mm and (3500 mm + (450 mm + 1050 mm) ÷ 2) = 5000 mm.
The reinforcing configuration, type, size, and amount or reinforcing steel detailed, will vary between designers and detailers.
It is recommended that reinforcing steel is detailed using the minimum amount of bars and lengths of bars.
Using many different bar lengths and configurations will increase the risk of fixing errors and fixing time on site.
At least 20% of the top tension reinforcing steel should be continuous through the spans.
It is recommended that the remaining 80% of the top reinforcing steel extends to within 0.25L or 45 x bar diameter from the face of the support,
whichever is the larger length.
In this case, 1 No. Y20 is used for the top reinforcing steel.
This reinforcing bar should extend past the face of the support by the larger of (0.25 x 4152 mm) = 1038 mm and (45 x 20 mm diameter) = 900 mm.
Extend the reinforcing bar 1038 mm (Rounded off = 1050 mm) past the face of the support (Refer to Figure 35).
102
Coffers and Troughs
Stirrups
700
B
1 No. reinforcing bar per Bottom reinforcement
rib with a bend equivalent
to 12 x the bar diameter
1Y20 B (Each Rib)
extended past the centre
line of the support 450 x 450
columns
CL Support CL Support
Section A - A
Beam F1 B Beam F2
3
f 19 CL Troughs
Re
sh
A Me A
900
Beam B1
Beam A1
CL Troughs
B Trough ribs
CL Support CL Support
Plan View
Trough ribs
Section B - B
Figure 35 – Top And Bottom Reinforcement, Stirrups And Mesh For Trough Ribs
Work through Steps 1 to 50 until all the Trough beams and ribs are designed. 103
INTRODUCTION Coffers and Troughs
SUMMARY
coffers and troughs
Concrete design for Coffer and Trough slabs
Prior to starting a Coffer or Trough slab design, it is recommended that the designer works in conjunction with the architect/structural engineer to
establish the required overall parameters of the project (such as the minimum clearance height between floor levels, overall height of the structure,
fire resistance requirements, etc.).
Refer to the architectural and design considerations shown on Pages 3 and 4 of this Concrete Design Guide.
Refer to the Form-Scaff Technical User Guide which provides technical information regarding the various formwork components that make up
the Coffer and Trough systems.
Contact Form-Scaff to confirm the availability of the Coffer or Trough equipment and the support work required for the concrete structure.
For the design of a Coffer slab, follow Steps 1 to 50 shown on pages 10 to 54 for worked examples.
For the design of a Trough slab, follow Steps 1 to 50 shown on pages 61 to 103 for worked examples.
Final analysis, reinforced concrete detailing and the checking of drawings and bending schedules for the Coffer and Trough slabs, must be carried
out by a suitably qualified professional, competent in reinforced concrete design.
As previously mentioned, this Concrete Design Guide should be used as a guide only.
Note:
This Concrete Design Guide may be also used in conjunction with the ‘Coffer and Trough Concrete Design Programme’ which is available from
Form-Scaff on request.
104
64
ABBREVIATIONS Coffers and Troughs
Table 10 - Bending Moment Coefficients For Rectangular Panels Supported On Four Sides With Provision For Torsional 37
Reinforcement At The Corners
Table 11 - Bending Moment Coefficients For Slabs Spanning In Two Directions At Right Angles And Simply Supported 38
On Four Sides
Table 12 - Minimum Percentage Of Reinforcement (For Flanged Beam With Web In Tension) 40
Table 14 - Minimum Percentage Of Reinforcement (For Flanged Beam With Flange In Tension Over Continuous Support) 45
Table 20 - Ultimate Bending Moments And Shear Forces In One-way Spanning Slabs 87
105
ABBREVIATIONS Coffers and Troughs
107
108
coffers and troughs NOTES
NOTES
109
coffers and troughs
Form-Scaff:
181 Barbara Road, Elandsfontein, 1600
+27 11 842 4000
[email protected]
www.formscaff.com