Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Pathophysiology:
Multiple, small areas of atrial myocardium continuously discharging and contracting → no
uniform atrial depolarization and contraction (only a quivering of the atrial chamber walls) →
ineffective ventricular filling and diminished cardiac output.
ECG Features:
● Absence of discernible P waves with flat or chaotic isoelectric baseline, most
prominent in V1
● QRS complexes narrow unless preexisting bundle branch block or preexcitation
syndrome
● Irregularly irregular ventricular rhythm
Clinical Significance:
AF is usually associated with ischemic and valvular heart diseases. Less common causes
include congestive cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, alcohol binge (“holiday heart”),
thyrotoxicosis, and blunt chest trauma.
Treatment:
ED treatment of AF involves 3 issues:
1. Ventricular rate control
2. Rhythm conversion
3. Anticoagulation
Anticoagulation
● Calculate CHA2DS2-VASc score to risk-stratify the potential for future arterial
embolic complications.
● For unstable patients requiring cardioversion who are at increased risk for embolic
complications, administer an initial dose of a DOAC for nonvalvular AF or LMWH for
patient with mechanical prosthetic valve, rheumatic mitral stenosis, or serious renal
impairment before or immediately after electrical cardioversion.
● For patients treated with heparin, transition to warfarin is begun on discharge with
continued heparin treatment until the INR is in the therapeutic range.
In complex AF (AF + RVR with significant underlying acute medical issues, e.g.: sepsis,
severe hypovolemia, PE, alcohol withdrawal, etc), management priority is focused on
treating the underlying medical issue while not employing standard rate and rhythm control
therapies in the early stages of care. Because, it is significantly more difficult to achieve rate
or rhythm control in complex AF and such attempts are associated with an increased
incidence of adverse events.
For stable low-risk patients NOAF, either rate-control or rhythm-conversion strategies are
appropriate. But no proven benefit for conversion of all NOAF patients to SR while in the ED,
because: rate of spontaneous conversion is high (70% within 48-72%) and AF trials
demonstrating that rate control is similar to rhythm control in terms of several key endpoints.
So, stable NOAF → rate control alone, either as an inpatient or outpatient depending on
overall clinical condition
https://recapem.com/atrial-fibrillation-in-critically-ill-patients-innocent-bystander-or-criminal/
https://emcrit.org/squirt/af/