Geotextile Solution
Geotextile Solution
Geotextile Solution
These are:
• separation • drainage • filtration • reinforcement • protection
The first step in evaluating geotextile design and performance is to identify the key
functions relative to the application. Table 1 identifies these functions for a variety of
Drainage
typical applications. The next step is to identify factors that will influence or affect
geotextile performance and determine the properties of the geotextile required to
withstand these influences.
Filtration
Reinforcement
Protection
Stabilization (Separation/Filtration/Drainage)
Roadways Railways
Slope repair Steepened slopes for embankment construction and road widening Retaining walls
Waterways Runoff ditches and channels Scour protection for Filters behind gabions
bridge piers and abutments
Polyfelt effectively separates fill placed over soft saturated subgrades. Range of typical aggregate thickness loss as a function of subgrade strength
(FHWA, 1989).
Polyfelt is recognized as one of the toughest and durable geotextiles available and
unlike other geotextiles, is not easily damaged or punctured.
UV Resistance
All geotextiles degrade when exposed to sunlight. In many subgrade stabilization Polyfelt is commonly used to stabilize road fill
over soft clay and peat.
applications, construction progress requires geotextiles to be exposed to sunlight
for an extended time. All standard Polyfelt products are produced from polymers
specially formulated with Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers (HALS) to provide
optimum ultraviolet light resistance. Laboratory testing shows Polyfelt geotextiles
have excellent UV resistance characteristics compared with competitive products
(Figure 1).
Cost Savings
Effective geotextile design can save between 10% and 50% of the original road
cost due to increased construction speed and material savings. In addition to
initial construction savings, reduction of maintenance costs in excess of 25% have
been reported (IFAI, 1992). However, the major cost savings are achieved through
the increased life and utilization of the roadway system.
Example of difference between Polyfelt stabilized
haul road (background) and severe rutting over
non stabilized section (foreground).
Polyfelt geosynthetics can be laid directly over the saturated subsoil. No Figure 1 : UV resistance of Polyfelt geotextile (Results of tests conducted
special clearing is required. by Geotechnical Control office, H.K., 1989).
Improved Filtration
Filtration is one of the primary functions of geotextiles. However, some geotextiles
are better filters than other. The gradation of the soil to be filtered must be
compatible to the pore size distribution of the geotextile. Continuous filament,
needle punched, non women geotextiles such as Polyfelt generally perform better
in providing proper filtration over a broader range of soils than other geotextile
types. A key development in Polyfelt’s patented manufacturing process is to
provide excellent geotextile pore size distribution for optimum filtration.
Construction Survivability
The fibre structure of Polyfelt geotextiles ensure
Geotextile filters require sufficient strength againts installation stresses and rough optimum filtration of fine soils and high permeability.
backfilling procedures. All Polyfelt standard geotextile products will withstand
construction stress imposed on the geotextile during placement of drainage
aggregates. Polyfelt has a reputation of being more robust than most other
geotextiles.
Installation Flexibility
Installation flexibility is an important characteristic in filtration applications to ensure
the geotextile is in intimate contact with the filtered soil. The mechanical bonding of
continuous filament, needle punched, nonwoven geotextiles such as Polyfelt,
provides greater installation flexibility than heat bonded or woven geotextiles. The
superior flexibility of Polyfelt geotextiles allows easy contouring to different subsoil
profiles without being over stressed and therefore is less prone to construction
damage.
Cost Savings
Based solely on a cost comparison of in-place, select graded aggregates
typically used in drain construction, geotextiles will, in most cases, be the most
economical solution. Further cost reductions are feasible through allowable
reductions in the size of the drain trench. In most cases, cost savings of 30% to
50% can be achieved (FHWA), 1985) Typical subsoil drain construction.
The correct grade of Polyfelt can be obtained by determining Polyfelt is commonly used in sports fields, golf courses and agriculture drainage
the d60, d50, d10 of the soil to be filtered. applications. Polyfelt allows quick drainage of heavy tropical rain.
Solution
Polyfelt Performance
Multiple layers of geotextiles placed in a slope during construction or reconstruc- Benefits
tion will reinforce the soil and provide increased slope stability. Soil reinforcement
• Allows construction of wider roads,
allows for the safe construction of steep slopes, typically on the order of one
without increasing necessary right-
horizontal to one vertical (1H:1V). Even vertical structures can be safely
of-way, by replacing gentle slopes
constructed. Additionally, geotextiles placed at the edges of a slope provide
with reinforced, steep slopes.
increased lateral resistance during compaction, thus allowing an increase in
compaction density over that normally achieved. The in-plane drainage capacity • Reduces the amount of fill material
of Polyfelt continuous filament, needle punched, nonwoven geotextiles can and land required and hence the cost.
relieve pore water pressures within the slopes, thereby improving the soil- • Allows the use of less select in-situ
geotextile interaction and allow the use of lower quality, moisture sentitive soils as fill.
cohesive soils. Improved drainage also reduces seepage forces and enhances • Increases the factor of safety of
the stability of such structures. marginally stable slopes.
• Allows the construction of vertical
soil structures.
• Allows lateral in-plane drainage.
• Resists construction damage
imposed by compaction equipment.
Geotextiles for 10m high reinforced bridge abutment. The facing profile is easily constructed using
temporary facing boards.
Instrumented 6m high Polyfelt reinforced Embankment constructed over soft Bangkok clay.
Polyfelt high strength geotextile for construction of permanent retaining wall structure. 7 m high Polyfelt reinforced bund with slope angle
65˚ utilizing laterite fill.
The principle aging factor for olefin materials is oxidation. Achemical ultraviolet light
stabilization antioxidant (HALS) package is added to Polyfelt geotextiles during
manufacture to reduce the effects of UV oxidation. As a result, Polyfelt geotextiles
Table 2 : Comparative pH resistance of common
exhibit a superior level of UV resistance compared with other geotextiles (Figure 1). geotextile polymer types.
The representative partial factors of safety for Polyfelt geotextiles in Table 4 are
considered conservative and are based on laboratory and field data. Polyfelt’s
in-house studies, as well as those conducted by Koerner and Koerner (1990) and
Allen (1991), indicate that polypropylene, needle punched nonwovens are less
susceptible to construction damage than most other types of geotextiles. Table 3 : Constrution stress effect on geotextiles.
effective stress transfer even with cohesive fill materials. Table 4 : Partial factors of safety for installation
damage* for Polyfelt geotextiles. (NB: Polyfelt is
less susceptible to damage than other geotextiles)
Cost Savings
Geotextiles can be used to safely construct 1H : 1V slopes, without expensive
facing systems, essentially reducing the land and volume of fill. The cost of a
structure can be considerably reduced when the high cost of importing suitable fill
can be avoided. Since less select onsite fill material can typically be used with
Polyfelt geotextiles, the material cost savings from volume and quality alone will
offset the reinforcement cost. Also considering land savings, Polyfelt reinforced
steep slope structures are more cost effective than unreinforced soil slopes.
* (Polyfelt Design & Practice Manual 1987 J & LTesting. Interface
Friction Testing, 1991)
Solution
Polyfelt Performance
Polyfelt geotextiles installed over the subgrade together with traditional materials benefits
such as bamboo have proven an efficient and cost effective method of
• Provides a working platform for
constructing a strong working platform over extremely soft soils (CBR<1). The
access of construction vehicles for
system, pioneered by Polyfelt, allows rapid placement of fill using conventional
subsequent filling operations.
earthwork plant. Polyfelt geotextiles used together with bamboo have proven
successful in numerous projects such as reclamation of 20 m deep soft mine • Prevents the contamination and loss
tailing ponds in Malaysia with a soil shear strength of 1 kPa-5 kPa strength. of fill materials.
• Reduces volume of fill materials and
cost.
• Prevents mud wave and clay heave.
• Provides in-plane drainage of water.
• Tightly encapsulate vertical drain
systems installed to increase rate of
consolidation, thus prevent upward
migration of fines into drainage layer.
• Facilitates maximum transmission of
bamboo flexural strength into initial
fill layers.
Bamboo mat as working platform and soil reinforcement. Polyfelt geotextile installed prior to filling.
Installation of Polyfelt in track rehabilitation works for Malaysian Railways (KTM). Typical contaminated rail ballast.
Polyfelt installed as a filter gabion dam construction works. Typical aggregate/polyfelt revetment system.
Construction Survivability
During placement of the riprap, geotextiles are subjected to high impact stresses
due to the drop energy of the stone. Polyfelt geotextiles selection and design
criteria for construction damage (puncture) are based on large scale tests that
simulate actual practical conditions where influencing factors like rock size, drop
height and types of foundation are accounted for.
Flexibility
Geotextiles are subjected to constant direct dynamic wave action if the geotextile
span between the stone armour, is not in intimate contact with the soil. Poor contact
Large scale drop test using variable weights and
with the subsoil allows soil movement and fines migration beneath the geotextile. drop heights to determine the resistance of
Polyfelt to damage during placement of rock
Thus, a highly flexible geotextile which easily conforms to the subsoil/stone
armour.
armour interface must be used to provide a firm contact with the subsoil and the
stone armour. Smooth and stiff geotextiles should be particularly avoided on steep
slopes where there is a potential for the stone armour to slide. Due to flexibility and
higher interface friction capability, Polyfelt geotextiles are tough and flexible and
ensure superb interlocking between the subsoil and stone armour.
UV Resistance
Geotextiles are often exposed for extended periods during revetment construction
works. The geotextile can also be exposed to sunlight penetrating through open
space between the riprap. Polyfelt geotextiles have proven to have superior UV
resistance compared with other geotextile types (Figure 1).
Polyfelt nonwoven needle punched continuous filament geotextiles can significantly • Basement waterproofing.
enhance the performance of geomembrane liners. Polyfelt geotextile acts as a • Earth dams and canals.
protective cushion layer against dynamic and static puncture stress and effectively
dissipates gas and water percolation or seepage. Polyfelt Performance
Benefits
• High puncture resistance against
installation damage.
• Reduced construction costs by
reducing or eliminating sand or
gravel aggregate use.
• Effective dissipation of gas and
groundwater seepage emission.
The installation of Polyfelt as an underliner protection layer. In tunnel construction works Polyfelt protects liner
waterproofing from puncture damage and acts as
a drain for seepage water behind the membrane.
High UV Resistance
Geotextiles installed as liner protection are often subjected to prolonged exposure
Comprative punture improvement of HDPE
to sunlight. Polyfelt geotextiles which consist of UV stabilized polypropylene membranes and different geotextiles types.
polymer are recognised as having extremely high levels of UV resistance. (Figure 1) Adapted from Hulling & Koerner, “Puncture Resistance of
Geomembranes Using a Truncated Cone Test”, 1991.
To facilitate the rapid dissemination of information Polyfelt was one of the first
companies to harness the power of the internet and provide a comprehensive
internet based goesynthetics design facility available free of charge to engineers
in a variety of languages.
Polyfelt only utilizes high quality polymers. Admixture of low quality or recycled
polymers or fibers that easily break, tear or degrade is not possible. A fully
computerized statistical quality assurance process ensures consistent high quality
manufacturing efficiency that complies in full to ISO 9001 standard is backed by
a laboratory QC/QA system independently accredited by Geosynthetic
Accreditation Institute - Laboratory Accredition Program (GAI-LAP), USA
according to ISO/IEC 17025.
• Fisher, G.R., Holtz, R.D. and Christopher, B.R., 1990, Filter criteria based on
• Case History: Polyfelt TS used as
pore size distribution. 4th Int. Conf. on Geotextiles Geomembranes and Related
filter layers for large marina project.
Products. The Hague.
• Case History: Polyfelt TS geotextiles
• Koerner, G.R. and Koerner, R.M., 1990, Geotextiles installation damage
used as filter under gabion
assessment. 4th. Int. Conf. on Geotextiles Geomembranes and Related
mattresses.
Products, The Hague.
• Case History: Reinforcement of a
• Loke, K.H., 1992, Design and construction of geotextile stabilized road
flood protection dyke using Polyfelt F
structures over soft subgrades. Int. Conf. an Geotechnical Eng. Geotropika,
filtration mats.
Johor Bahru.
• Case History: Erosions Protection of
• Loke, K.H. and Wee, S.H., 1992, The use of nonwoven needle punched
an overflow section in the “Danube
geotextile filters in coastal and riverbank erosion protection. Int. Sym. on
Floodplains” National Park.
Applications of Geosynthetic Technology,. Jakarta.
• Technical Note: UV resistance of
• Lee, C.H. and Loke K.H., 1992, Recent research results on nonwoven needle
geotextiles.
punched continuous filament geotextile and their practical significance. Int.
Sym. on Applications of Geosynthetics Technology, Jakarta.
• Technical Note: Investigation on the
installation survivability of geotextiles
• Rest, S. and Werner, G., 1986, The influence of nonwoven needle punched
(GRI).
geotextiles on the ultimate bearing capacity of the subgrade. 3rd. Int. Conf. on
Geotextiles, Vienna.
• Technical Note No. 2: Investigation
on the performance of geotextiles
• Toh, C.T., Chee, S.K., Lee, C.H. and Wee, S.H., 1992, Geotextiles for
under dynamic loading (Munich).
reclamation of disused tin mining ponds. Int. Sym. on Applications of
Geosynthetic Technology, Jakarta.
• Technical Note: Evaluation of friction
parameters between geosynthetics
• Werner, G., Resl, S., and Montalvo, R, 1989, The influence of nonwoven
and typical soils.
geotextiles on the compactability of the fill material. Geosynthetics ’89 Conf.
San Diego, USA.
• Technical Note: Performance of
geotextiles in railroad construction -
• Wewerka, M., 1986, Filtration capability of geotextiles - testing and practical
laboratory testing at Dresden Univ.
experience. 3rd. Int. Conf. on Geotextiles, Vienna.
• Technical Note: The pyramid
puncture test acc. ONORM S 2076
and ASTM D5494 for the evaluation
of geotextile protection efficiency.
The world
builds on polyfelt