j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcot

Original article

Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and

dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture
femur

Ranjeetesh Kumar MBBS*, R.N. Singh M.S. Ortho, FRCS,

B.N. Singh M.S. Ortho, FRCS
Anup Memorial Orthopedic Centre, 375, 77 PC Colony, Kankar Bagh, Patna 800020, India

article info abstract

Article history: Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures
Received 9 December 2011 treated with Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral nail.
Accepted 26 December 2011 Methods: This study was conducted on 50 cases of Intertrochanteric fractures of femur
Available online 16 June 2012 treated by a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. Patients were operated on
standard fracture table under image intensifier control.
Keywords: Results: The average age of the patient was 62.3 years. Most common mechanism of frac-
Intertrochanteric fracture ture was domestic fall. Twenty percent four percent had stable, 58% unstable and 18%
Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) reverse oblique pattern of fracture. The unstable pattern was more common in old aged
Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) patients with higher grade of osteoporosis. The average blood loss was 100 and 250 ml in
PFN and DHS group respectively. In PFN there were more no. of radiation exposure intra-
operatively. The average operating time for the patients treated with PFN was 55 min as
compared to 87 min in patients treated with DHS. Total complications were 15% with
implant failure 6%, infection 4%, nonunion 2% and greater trochanter splintering 4%. In the
PFN group the amount of sliding on X-rays was less as compared to DHS. The patients
treated with PFN started early ambulation as they had better Harris Hip Score in the early
period (at 1 and 3 month). In the long term both the implant had almost similar functional
outcomes.
Conclusion: The DHS was tolerated better by young patients with stable fracture while PFN
had a better outcome with osteoporotic patients and weak bone mass and reverse oblique
fractures.
Copyright ª 2012, Delhi Orthopaedic Association. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction increasing incidence of intertrochanteric fractures with

advancing age is well known.
Intertrochanteric fractures are defined as ‘fractures involving The incidence of intertrochanteric fractures varies from
upper end of femur through and in between both trochanters country to country. Gulberg et al1 has predicted that the total
with or without extension into upper femoral shaft’. An no of hip fractures will reach 2.6 million by 2025 and 4.5

* Corresponding author. 8/A364, DDA flats, Trilok Puri, Delhi 110091, India. Tel.: þ91 7654497497.
E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Kumar).
0976-5662/$ e see front matter Copyright ª 2012, Delhi Orthopaedic Association. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2011.12.001
 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6 29

million by 2050. In 1990 26% of all hip fractures occurred in 5. The intramedullary hip screw is a more biological method
Asia whereas this figure could rise to 37% in 2025 and 45% in of fixation.
2050.2
There is hope that hip fracture risk has begun to decline in For the above mentioned reasons it was believed that the
certain areas of world but reason is unknown. In Denmark intramedullary hip screw would be superior for the fixation of
the incidence of hip fractures has declined about 20% from intertrochanteric fractures.
1997 to 2006. But there is a debate as which implant should be used in
Hagino et al reported a lifetime risk of hip fracture for unstable fractures with special mention to osteoporotic bone
individuals at 50 yrs of age of 5.6% for men and 20.0% for and old age.
women.3 Our study was aimed at comparing the dynamic hip screw
Any medical condition associated with bone loss, like with the intramedullary hip screw device prospectively.
D.M., Hyperparathyroidism, Hyperthyroidism and Cushing’s
syndrome is associated with a 2e7-fold rise in the risk for hip
fractures. 2. Methods
They are the most frequently operated fracture type, have
the highest postoperative fatality rate of surgically treated The present study was undertaken in patients more than 50
fractures and have become a serious health resource issue years of age with the following objectives
because of the high cost of care required after injury. With
advancing life expectancy and geriatric care more patients 1. To compare the Dynamic Hip Screw and the Proximal
who were conservatively treated in the past are now candi- Femoral Nail method of fixation in intertrochanteric frac-
dates for surgery, thus the need for a study to better under- ture of femur in the adults with respect to intra operative
stand the intertrochanteric fractures and the best possible parameters (total duration of surgery, intraoperative blood
means to fix them. loss and intraoperative complication).
The various treatment options for intertrochanteric frac- 2. To compare the functional outcome with respect to union
tures are operative and nonoperative. The nonoperative of the fracture, functional return, mortality and complica-
method used to be treatment of choice in early 19th century tions in the two groups.
when operative technique was not evolved enough to do 3. To study the pattern of implant failure in the two groups
stable fixation. Nonoperative treatment should only be and try to determine the cause and how to prevent failure.
considered in nonambulatory or chronic dementia patients 4. To determine which implant would be ideal for which
with pain that is controllable with analgesics and rest, fracture type so as to provide the best results with the least
terminal diseases with less than 6 weeks of life expectancy, complications
unresolved medical comorbidities that preclude surgical 5. To study the long term follow up of the two groups with
treatment, active infectious diseases that itself a contraindi- respect to any residual impairment of function, chronic
cation for insertion of a surgical implant and incomplete infection and overall tolerability of implant.
pertrochanteric fractures diagnosed by MRI. Nonoperative 6. To study in detail the types of fracture patterns seen in the
approach include reduction via traction and Early mobiliza- intertrochanteric region with respect to mode of injury and
tion within the limits of pain tolerance. age of the patients.
The conservative approach has high complication rate. The
common problems of prolonged immobilization, decubitus The material for the present study was obtained from the
ulcers, U.T.I, joint contractures, pneumonia, and thrombo- patients admitted with the diagnosis of intertrochanteric
embolism contribute to the high mortality rate. The increased fracture femur from August 2007 to July 2010. The patients
incidence of varus deformity and shortening results in poor were randomly selected on first come and first inclusion basis.
function. Fifty consecutive operated cases were selected and the
The operative management of intertrochanteric fractures patients were informed about the study in all respects and
has evolved since usage of fixed nail plate, dynamic hip informed consent was obtained from each patient. Out of 50
screws to which several modifications have been added to patients 25 patients were treated with D.H.S and 25 with P.F.N.
intramedullary devices. The inclusion criteria for the patient in this study were the
The intramedullary devices offer certain distinct advantages: surgically fit patients more than 50 years of age who has been
diagnosed as having intertrochanteric fractures. The exclusion
1. The implant itself serves as a buttress against lateral criteria were Patients unfit for the surgery, with compound
translation of the proximal fragment or pathological fractures, admitted for re-operation and those
2. The intramedullary location of the junction between the who have not given written consent for surgery.
nail and lag screw makes the implant stronger at resisting All the patients were carefully evaluated preoperatively
the binding forces which included detailed history to determine the cause of
3. The intramedullary device has a reduced distance between fracture and other diseases. The radiograph of pelvis with
the weight bearing axis and the implant that is a shorter both hips and lateral view of the affected hip was taken. The
lever arm. fracture was classified using Orthopaedic Trauma Association
4. An intramedullary device bears the bending load which is (OTA) classification. Skin traction was applied to all cases.
transferred to the intramedullary nail and is resisted by its Implant either DHS or PFN was randomly selected by
contact against the medullary canal (load sharing device) operating surgeon. For DHS Length of compression screw is
30 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6

measured from tip of the head to the base of greater tron- All the fractures were classified as per the A.O. (O.T.A.)
chanter on AP view X-ray subtracting magnification, neck- classification. There were a total of 12 A-1 fractures, 29 A-2
shaft angle Neck shaft angle is determined using goniometer fractures and 9 A-3 fractures. The various types of fractures
on X-ray AP view on unaffected side and length of side plate treated with either DHS or PFN are shown in (Table 2).
length of the side plate is determined to allow purchase of
atleast 8 cortices to the shaft distal to the fracture. 3.1. Implants used
For PFN Nail diameter was determined by measuring
diameter of the femur at the level of isthmus on an AP X-ray, The dimensions of used implants in our study were:
Neck shaft angle was measured in unaffected side in AP X-ray
using goniometer and a standard length PFN (250 mm) was
1. D.H.S: Barrel angle 130 e 06 patients
used in all our cases.
(degrees) 135 e 16 patients
All cases were operated on a standard fracture table under 140 e 03 patients
spinal anesthesia using standard operating technique of the No. of holes 4 e 13 patients
implant chosen. The fracture table is essential to achieve 5 e 09 patients
reduction and as it allows free access for the C-arm in both 6 e 03 patients
views. Screw length 85 mm e 02 patients
90 mm e 20 patients
A combination of 3rd generation Cephalosporin and Amino
95 mm e 03 patients
glycoside was administered intravenously 30 min. prior to the
2. P.F.N: Nail diam. 9 mm e 15 patients
skin incision. The same combination was used for 48 hours 10mm e 05 patients
postoperatively in standard doses. 12mm e 05 patients
All patients in our study were treated with physical Screw angle 130e03 patients
methods such as early mobilization, manual compression of 135e22 patients
the calf and elastic stockings. Patients were encouraged ankle
and calf exercises from day one and mobilized nonweight
bearing from the second postoperative day depending upon One patient had fracture distal third radius which was
the physical condition of the patient. All drains were removed managed pop cast. Another patient who had road traffic
by 24 h. The wounds were inspected on the 3rd and 6th post accident had fracture of contralteral superior and inferior
operative day. Stitches were removed on the 11th day. pubic rami which was also managed by conservative method.
Patients were followed up at one monthly interval till fracture No other associated injury found in any other patient.
union and then at 6 monthly interval for 1 year and then at All the cases included in our study were operated as soon
yearly interval. as possible. The delay was due to physician clearance and
The important parameters assessed were: delay in reporting to hospital. The average delay of surgery in
our study was 3 days.
 Clinical:
1. Wound condition 3.2. Intraoperative details
2. Function on harris hip score
3. Shortening In our study we considered various intra operative parameters
4. Harris hip score like radiographic exposures, duration of surgery, amount of
 Radiological: blood loss and other intraoperative complications.
1. Union Duration of surgery was more for DHS compared to PFN.
2. Amount of collapse The duration of surgery as calculated from the time of incision
3. Complication like screw cut out and z phenomena to skin closure was counted in each case. The average dura-
tion of surgery for the PFN (Avg. time 55 min) was significantly
shorter then DHS (Avg. time 87 min).
3. Results Blood loss was measured by mop count and collection in
suction drain. Blood loss was more for DHS. The average blood
The study involved 50 confirmed cases of intertrochanteric loss in the P.F.N group was 100 ml and in the DHS group was
femur of either sex from August 2006 to July 2010. Out of 50 250 ml. 05 out of 25 patients in DHS group required blood
cases, 25 were treated by a dynamic hip screw and 25 were transfusion either intra or postoperatively.
treated by proximal femoral nail.
In our study maximum age was 85 years and minimum 3.2.1. Intraoperative complications DHS
was 50 years. The average age was 69.3 years. There were 20 The difficulty in reduction was encountered in cases that were
male and 30 female patients. The fracture due to domestic fall delayed and in case of comminuted fractures. In 3 of 25 cases
occurred in 31 patients (62%) while 19 patients (38%) met road there was improper placement of Richard’s screw. The screw
traffic accident. Patients with road traffic accidents were was placed superiorly. Difficulties were encountered in
younger while patients with domestic fall were older. The reverse oblique fractures as the fracture site extended to entry
right side was involved in 21 cases while left side in 29 cases point. The screw had to be inserted more proximally which
(Figs. 1e3). resulted in varus angulation. On table surgeon had to switch
The Singh’s index for osteoporosis (Table 1) showed that to PFN in 2 cases in reverse oblique fracture. These cases were
there were 23 patients with grade 4 and above. considered with PFN group (Table 3).
 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6 31

Fig. 1 e 51 Year-old male patient with intertrochanteric fracture fixed with PFN. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior view. (b and
c) Immediate post operative antero posterior and lateral view. (d) Anteroposterior view at 12 week follow up.

3.2.2. Intraoperative complications PFN D.H.S group it was not significant enough to cause any func-
There were iatrogenic fractures of the lateral cortex of tional impairment. There was 1 (2%) case of implant failure in
proximal fragment in 1 of 25 of PFN. This occurred in initial P.F.N group and revision surgery was required for it. The usual
cases probably due to wrong entry point and osteoporotic ‘Z’ pattern of implant failure was the reason.
bone. In 3 of 25 cases, we failed to put antirotation screw, it In the D.H.S group there were 2 (4%) cases of implant
could not be accommodated in the neck after putting neck failure one was due to screw cut out and other was due to
screw. We had no difficulties in distal locking. All the cases plate breakage. In both the cases revision surgery was
were locked distally with atleast one locking bolt. There required.
were no instances of drill bit breakage or jamming of nail In the P.F.N group there were no cases of nonunion. In the
(Table 4). D.H.S group there was one case of nonunion which was due to
The average hospital stay was 14.24 days (12e16) days in jamming, this patient responded to bone grafting.
case of DHS while 12.96 days (11e15) in case of PFN. The greater trochanter splintering was seen in 2 (4%)
There were 2 cases of infection seen in the D.H.S group. patients but it did not cause any complication later and healed
They were seen within 15 days of surgery and were treated by well. Greater Trochanter was either fixed with Ethibond
local debridement and antibiotic and did not require implant suture or TBW.
removal.
In the PFN group one patient developed pulmonary 3.3. Functional HIP scores
oedema. In the D.H.S group one patient developed deep vein
thrombosis. There was one death each in both groups the All patients were subjected to the Harris hip score5 at the 1
deaths occurred in both cases 3 months after surgery. In both month, 3 months, 6 months and one yearly two yearly follow
cases the cause of death was not related to the surgery. ups.
The sliding of both groups was compared at the end of 1 In the D.H.S group the 1 month hip score (Avg. 24.4) was
year on the X-rays as described by Hardy et al,4 there was an less than that of the P.F.N group (Avg. 33), p < 0.05 however
average of 5.4 mm of sliding in the P.F.N group as compared to this difference disappeared with the two group on the sixth
7.3 mm in the D.H.S group ( p < 0.05). The average shortening monthly and yearly follow up with both scores being same
in the P.F.N group was 5.5 mm as compared to 9.9 mm in the (D.H.S-93 and P.F.N-93). At 2 years the score was similar for
D.H.S group. Even though there was more shortening in the both implants i.e. 97 (Table 5).
32 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6

Fig. 2 e 76 Year-old female patient with fracture fixed with PFN. (a and b) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral view.
(c and d) Anteroposterior and lateral radiograph at 12 week follow up.

numerous biomechanical and biological advantages over the

4. Discussion conventional dynamic hip screw.4,6,7 Long term studies
however revealed that the use of these devices was asso-
In the last 3e4 decades treatment of intertrochanteric frac- ciated with higher intra operative and late complication
tures has changed significantly. A large number of fixation often requiring revision surgery. This has lead to modifica-
implants has been devised and discarded. The treatment still tions in the device and technique of the intramedullary
merits the type of fracture and condition of patient. devices.
The development of the dynamic hip screw in the 1960’s A review of literature will reveal several studies8e13 on the
saw a revolution in the management of unstable fractures. comparison of the dynamic hip screw to intramedullary nail.
The device allowed compression of the fracture site without All of them aimed to compare intra and postoperative
complications of screw cut out and implant breakage associ- complications, postoperative function, union rates and
ated with a nail plate. However the extensive surgical implant failure rate between the two.
dissection, blood loss and surgical time required for this
procedure often made it a contraindication in the elderly with
comorbidities. The implant also failed to give good results in 4.1. Sliding properties
extremely unstable and the reverse oblique fracture.
In the early 90s intramedullary devices were developed The sliding properties of both implants vary considerably.
for fixation of Intertrochanteric fractures. These devices had Siding is an essential principle in the management of
 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6 33

Fig. 3 e 63 Year-old male with fracture fixed with DHS. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior view. (b and c) Anteroposterior and
lateral radiograph at 12 weeks follow up.

intertrochanteric fractures. Sliding permits impaction of the In his subsequent studies on the sliding in second gener-
fracture fragments thus promoting healing. ation locked nails, Kyle et al14 has noted that increased forces
Kyle et al14 in his extensive study of the biomechanical are required to initiate sliding in intra medullary devices as
principles of the sliding hip screw has identified key factors compared to sliding hip screw with plate. Amongst all intra
that promote sliding, A reduction in the bending forces is vital medullary devices the Gamma nail requires the largest force.
since bending forces reduce slide and cause jamming of the The explanation lies in the barrel of the side plate, the barrel
implant. The bending forces are increased by: provides a free passage for the screw to slide, thus the longer
the barrel length the less the forces required to initiate sliding
1. Longer extension of the screw. (Table 6).
2. Smaller screw angle.
3. Heavier patients. 4.2. Barrel plate angle

The most routinely used barrel plate angle in most studies is

135 ; this is because of the ease of insertion and the more
anatomical restoration of femoral neck angle. However the
Table 1 e Fracture type, sex distribution and type of
implant used.
Fracture type Male Female P.F.N D.H.S

A1-1 1 3 e 4 Table 2 e Singh’s index.

A1-2 3 2 e 5
Grade No. of PTS (%)
A1-3 3 - 1 2
A2-1 4 6 5 5 I 03 (06%)
A2-2 6 8 7 7 II 08 (16%)
A2-3 1 4 3 2 III 16 (32%)
A3-1 2 1 3 e IV 8 (16%)
A3-2 e 2 2 e V 5 (10%)
A3-3 e 4 4 e VI 10 (20%)
34 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6

The average hospital stay was higher in DHS (14.24 days)

Table 3 e Intraoperative complications DHS.
because in cases of PFN All the stitches were removed on 10th
Intraoperative complication No of Percentage day in most of the cases.
cases
Total complications in our study were 15%. 3 of our patient
Improper insertion of compression screw 3 12% had implant failure. There was one case of non-union which
Varus angulation 2 8% responded to bone grafting. 4% of our patients had greater
trochanter splintering while inserting the nail. Infection was
present in 4% of the patient. They were seen within 20 days of
150 degree side plate has several advantages, since the forces
surgery and were treated and did not require implant removal.
are acting more in line with the screw less bending forces act
By radiological comparison the amount of sliding seen
across the screw so relatively less force is required to initiate between the immediate postoperative X-ray the one year
sliding resulting in more impaction.15,16 Valgus hips are follow up X-ray in both the groups, it was noted that the
however more prone to develop early O.A.
amount of sliding in the P.F.N group was less as compared to
the dynamic hip screw. This was a result of the proximal part
4.3. Sliding length of the nail blocking the head and neck fragment, this finding is
in accordance with the studies of Kyle et al14 and Hardy et al.4
Gundle et al17 has noted a positive correlation between sliding
The success of proximal femoral nail depended on good
length and union. In his study he found that fractures fixed
surgical technique, proper instrumentation and good C-arm
with a sliding length (i.e. the distance from proximal tip of the
visualization. All the patients were operated on fracture table.
barrel to the distal thread of the screw) of less than 10 mm had
Placement of the patient on the fracture table is important,
3 times higher rate of failure than those with sliding length
for better access to the greater trochanter the upper body is
more than 10 mm. This is particularly true in devices that
abducted away 10e15 . Position of the C-arm should be such
have a 32 mm threaded screw length with a 32 mm barrel. He
that proximal femur is seen properly in AP and lateral view.
thus recommends a short barrel for screws with less than
The anatomical reduction and secure fixation of the patient on
85 mm screw length.
the operating table are absolutely vital for easy handling and
In the present study 50 patients of either sex with Inter-
good surgical result.
trochanteric fractures were studied.
The entry point of the nail was taken on the tip or the
In our study the average age was 69.3 years which was
lateral part of the greater trochanter.
comparable to Indian as well as western authors with similar
As the nail has 6 of valgus angle medial entry point causes
study. We had an 1:1.5 male: female ratio unlike male
more distraction of the fracture. The hip pin is inserted 5 mm
predominance in the Indian authors.
away from the subchondral bone in the lower half in the AP
The most common mode of injury in our study was
view and center on the neck in the lateral view. The cervical
domestic fall 62%, which is comparable to most of the Indian
pin is placed parallel to the hip pin in AP view and overlapping
studies. This was also affected by the age as the older the
it in the lateral view. It should be 10 mm shorter than the hip
patient more likely he/she getting the fracture by domestic
pin from the subchondral bone. This ensures that the cervical
falls. In our study 24% were stable fracture pattern and 76%
screw will not take the weight load but only fulfill the anti-
were unstable. In 58% of cases left limb was involved. Osteo-
rotational function. Failure to do this leads to the “Z effect”.
porosis was measured by the Singh’s index. More osteoporosis
In which the cervical pin backs out and the hip pin pierces the
was present in the older patient and post-menopausal
joint or the vice-versa.
females. In our study 32% had a grade e III osteoporosis.
Distal locking was done with the interlocking bolts. In most
The average intra operative blood loss was very minimal in
of the cases only dynamic hole was locked. In our study one of
the P.F.N. The average blood loss in the P.F.N group was 100 ml
the important factor was the cost of the implant as proximal
and in the D.H.S group was 250 ml. The radiation exposure
femoral nail is costly than the dynamic hip screw, but at the
was more in case of P.F.N (Avg. no. of exposure 70 ) while in
end it didn’t cause much of the difference as:
DHS it was 40.
The average operating time for the patients treated with
 Less operative time thus reducing the cost
P.F.N was 55 min as compared to 87 min in patients treated
 No or less need of transfusion of blood
with D.H.S. We had a greater operating time in the beginning
 Postoperative antibiotics were used less reducing the cost of
which reduced greatly in the later part of the study. This
the drugs
signifies the learning curve of the proximal femoral nailing.
 Less hospital stay
 Early return to daily activities.

Table 4 e Intraoperative complications PFN. Dynamic hip screw introduced by Clawson in 1964 remains
the implant of choice due to its favorable results and low rate
Complication Number Percentage
of complications. It provides control compression at the
of cases
fracture site. Its use has been supported by its biomechanical
Failure to achieve closed reduction 0 0 properties which have been assumed to improve the healing
Fracture of lateral cortex 1 4% of the fracture.
Failure to put derotation screw 3 12%
But Dynamic hip screw requires a relatively larger expo-
Fracture displacement by nail insertion 1 4%
sure, more tissue trauma and anatomical reduction. All these
 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6 35

Table 5 e Comparison between the PFN and DHS.

P.F.N (n ¼ 25) D.H.S (n ¼ 25) p-Value
a b a b
Blood loss 100 ml  16.40 ml 250 ml  44.98 ml <0.05
Radiation exposure 70aþ1.6(in no.) 40aþ4 (in no.)
Duration of surgery 55a min  18b min 87a min  3.2b min <0.05
Hospital stay 13.96a days 14.24a days
Harris hip score at 1 month 33a  0.4b 24.4a  3.3b <0.05
Harris hip score at 3 months 58a  5.6b 53a  3.0b <0.05
Harris hip score at 6 months 88a  2.5b 85a1.6b >0.05
Harris hip score at 1 Year 93a  2.7b 93a  2.1b >0.05
Harris hip score at 2 Year 97a þ 2 97a þ 2 >0.05
Sliding 5.5a mm 7.3a mm <0.05
Shortening 5.4a mm 9.9a mm <0.05
Implant failure 1 (2%) 2 (4%) <0.05
Non-union 0 1 (2%) <0.05
Deaths 1 (2%) 1 (2%) >0.05
Infection 0 2 (4%) <0.05
Med. com. 1 (2%) 1 (2%) >0.05
GT splintering 2 (4%) 0 >0.05

a Indicates a mean of all observed data.

b Indicates one standard deviation (S.D).

increase the morbidity, probability of infection and signifi- adequately compress the fracture, leaving between them
cant blood loss. It also causes varus collapse leading to adequate bone block for further revision should the need
shortening and inability of the implant to survive until the arise.
fracture union.
The plate and screw device will weaken the bone 4.4. Nail or plate
mechanically. The common causes of fixation failure are
instability of the fractures, osteoporosis, lack of anatomical The sliding hip screw with plate remained the gold standard
reduction, failure of fixation device and incorrect placement for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures for years. With the
of the screw. arrival of the intra medullary hip screw it was thought that the
We found proximal femoral nail to be more useful in sliding hip screw would be replaced forever, however this is
unstable and reverse oblique patterns due to the fact that it not true the intra medullary hip screw has its own set of
has better axial telescoping and rotational stability as it is complications, more exposure to radiation, a higher learning
a load shearing device.14,18,19 It has shown to be more curve and all at a higher cost.
biomechanically stronger because they can withstand higher The dynamic hip screw is still the implant of choice in the
static and several fold higher cyclical loading than dynamic stable types of intertrochanteric fractures. If the proper intra
hip screw. So the fracture heals without the primary restora- operative guide lines are adhered to then the results in this
tion of the medial support. The implant compensates for the group of patients is excellent. In our study we had to change
function of the medial column. the plan from DHS to PFN in two cases intraoperatively.
Proximal femoral nail also acts as a buttress in preventing In the more unstable types of fracture the intra medullary
the medialization of the shaft. The entry point of the proximal hip screw has distinct advantages over the plate and should be
femoral nail is at the tip of the greater trochanter so it reduces the preferred implant for fixation. The need to achieve an
the damage to the hip abductors unlike the nails which has anatomical reduction is mandatory since there is less sliding
entry through pyriformis fossa. The hip screw and the anti with this implant. Any gap on the postoperative X-rays could
rotation cervical screw of the Proximal femoral nail always lead to a future non-union.

Table 6 e Comparison of few published studies using nail for trochantric fracture with current study.
Name of study Number of cases Age Blood loss Time Nonunion Shaft Infection

IMN DHS IMN DHS IMN DHS IMN DHS #’s IMN DHS
50
Hardy 50 (Gamma nail) 50 79 144 198 71 57 0 1 2 0 0
Leung48 113 (Gamma nail) 113 78 765 115 53 42 1 0 2 1 3
7
Bridle47 49 (Gamma nail) 51 81.5 116 133 36 33 e e 4 1 2
Pajarinen53 54 (P.F.N) 54 79 320 357 55 45 e e e e e
Little54 92 (Holland nail) 98 83.4 78 160 54 40.3 e e e 5 10
Current series 25 (P.F.N) 25 62.3 100 250 55 87 0 1 0 0 2
36 j o u r n a l o f c l i n i c a l o r t h o p a e d i c s a n d t r a u m a 3 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 8 e3 6

In conclusion both the implants are here to stay, it is the randomized prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint
fracture geometry and bone quality which will influence the Surg Br. 1992;74:345e351.
choice of fixation .The quality of the reduction and proper 8. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-brown CM, Mc-Queen MM.
Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intra medullary
positioning of the implant are the keys to achieving the best
nail vs. dynamic hip screw with plate for the
postoperative outcome. intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma.
2001;15:394e400.
9. Ahrengart L, Tornkvist H, Fornander P, et al. A randomized
study of the compression hip screw & the Gamma nail in 426
Conflicts of interest
fractures. Clin Orthop. 2002;401:209e222.
10. Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V,
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received HirvensaloE. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail:
subject of this article. a randomized study comparing post-operative
rehabilitation.
11. Little NJ, Verma V, Fernando C, Elliott DS, Khaleel A. A
prospective trial comparing the Holland nail with the dynamic
references hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the
hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 2008;90-B:1073e1078.
12. Baumgaertner MR, Chrostowski JH, Levy RN. In: Browner BD,
1. Gulberg B, Jhonell O, Kanis J. Worldwide projection for hip Levine Am, Jupiter JB, eds. Skeletal Trauma, Vol. 2.
fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:407e413. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:1833e1881.
2. Melton LJ 3rd, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ, et al. Secular trends in 13. Wiss DA, Morrey BF, Baumgaertner MR, Koval KJ. Master
hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int. Techniques in Orthopaedics: Fracture. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:
2009;20(5):687e694. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2006:233e264.
3. Hagino H, Furukawa K, Fujiwara S, et al. Recent trends in 14. Kyle RF, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Biomechanical analysis of
incidence and lifetime risk of hip fracture in Tottori. Japan the sliding characteristics of compression hip screws. J Bone
Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(4):543e548. Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1308e1314.
4. Hardy D, Descamps P, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary 15. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi J. The value
hip screw compared with a compression hip screw with of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of
a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77:1058e1064.
Am. 1998;80:618e630. 16. Gl Wolfgang, Bryant MH, O’Neil JP. The treatment of
5. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation & intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur using
ace tabular fractures: Treated by mould arthroplasty. An end sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop. 1982;163:148e158.
result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone 17. Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AHRW. How to minimize
Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737e755. failure of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
6. Spivak JM, Zuckerman JD, Kumme FJ. Fatigue failure of sliding Injury. 1995;26:611e614.
hip screw in hip fractures a report of three cases. J Orthop 18. Boyd HB, Griffin LL. Classification & treatment of
Trauma. 1991;3:325e331. intertrochanteric fractures. Arch Surg. 1949;58:853e866.
7. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW. Gamma nails and 19. Jensen JS, Michaelsen M. Trochanteric fractures treated with
dynamic hip screws for pertrochanteric fractures. A McLaughlin plate. Acta Ortho Scand. 1975;46:795e803.