Monograph Assessment Rubric

Monography Checklist 10 points
1. Index
2. introduction
3. Objetives
4. Content (25 pages mínimum)
a. 25 pages long
b. Doble space
c. Font size 12
d. Margins (superior and left 1 ½, inferior
and left 1 inch)
e. Complete pages (no spaces left)
5. Quotations (10 minimum)
6. Conclusions
7. Bibliography (10 minimum)
Exemplary/ Excellent
Topic Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent
Selection 4 points 6 points 8 points 10 points
Topic is very general and has no Student has narrowed the Topic is specific enough that the Topic of the paper is clearly
focus. Scope of the paper is so topic somewhat. Further student can give proper defined. Research focus has been
broad it is impossible to give research may lead to a treatment within the given narrowed by specific criteria. The
proper treatment within the given better topic selection. length. Student may still need to state-of-the-art may be clearly
length. narrow the focus by applying given within the paper's length.
specific criteria to eliminate
unnecessary information.
Content Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

X2
Research articles reviewed are Articles reviewed had some A good general review of the All relevant papers are reviewed,
scattered and unrelated. Student relation to each other and literature is included, covering from seminal early works to the
clearly did not filter out irrelevant to the chosen topic. most of the seminal early papers latest current developments. The
articles and instead summarized Keyword search may need and the most relevant current articles reviewed are clearly inter-
the top "web hits". to be refined. papers. Papers reviewed are related and build upon each
cohesive and inter-related. other to show how we have
progressed to the current state-
of-the-art.
Organization Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent
Writing is not logically organized. In general, writing is Writing is logically organized to Ideas are arranged logically to
Paragraphs lack topic sentences logically organized. support the central purpose. support the purpose of the
and may contain more than one Occasionally paragraphs Paragraphs contain only one paper. Paragraphs contain one
major idea. Paragraphs and contain more than one main idea, with each paragraph topic sentence, and supporting
sentences do not support each main idea or contain supporting the others. The sentences clearly flow from one
other. sentences unrelated to the reader can follow the structure to the other. Paragraphs also are
main idea. Some support of the paper and understands clearly linked to each other. The
and flow among the writer's intentions. reader can easily follow the
paragraphs. Reader has a paper.
fairly clear idea of what the
writer intends.
Sentence Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

Structure
Errors in sentence structure are Some sentences are Sentences are well-phrased and Sentences are well-phrased and
frequent enough to be a major awkwardly constructed so there is some variety in length varied in length and structure.
distraction to the reader that the reader is and structure. Flow from They flow smoothly from one to
occasionally distracted. sentence to sentence is another.
generally smooth.
Grammar, Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

spelling,
There are so many errors the Paper has many distracting There are occasional errors, but Writing is free or almost free of
punctuation
meaning is obscured. Student errors. Perhaps some they are not too distracting and errors.
obviously did not proof read the editing did occur. do not obscure the meaning of
paper at all. the sentence.
Use of Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

References
Student failed to cite sources. Very Although attributions are Professionally legitimate sources Compelling evidence from
X2 few references given throughout occasionally given, many are generally present and legitimate sources are given.
paper, even though the content statements seem attribution is, for the most part, Attribution is clear and fairly
clearly did not originate from the unsubstantiated. Sources clear and fairly represented. represented.
student. of information are unclear. Student made a good effort at
citing sources.
Quality of Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent
References
Virtually no professionally reliable Most of the references are Majority of the references cited References are primarily peer-
sources. Random websites with no from sources that are not are from peer-reviewed sources. reviewed professional journals or
qualifications are references. The peer-reviewed. Accuracy of Accuracy of some sources may other approved sources. Reader
Wikipedia appeared to be the only the material is unable to be not be verifiable but are is confident that information and
source. substantiated. generally regarded as legitimate. ideas can be trusted.
Minimal use of Wikipedia.

Monograph Assessment Rubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Monograph Assessment Rubric

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Monograph Assessment Rubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Monography Checklist 10 points

Content Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

Organization Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

Sentence Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

Grammar, Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

Use of Beginning/Unacceptable Developing/Fair Accomplished/Good Exemplary/Excellent

You might also like