Abstract and Introduction (Lab Report)
Abstract and Introduction (Lab Report)
Abstract and Introduction (Lab Report)
ABSTRACT
We were tasked to read and include a total of 25 journals to tackle Gregor Johann
Mendel’s life and works. I was only able to find and read 17 journals, unfortunately. His life was
discussed first and his works in the latter part of the introduction. We also did an activity. The
activity was all about the probability of what character traits will show or will be picked. In the
first activity, we used coins and labeled them with the character traits (RR-dominant trait; Rr-
recessive trait). And then we used marbles (green, and yellow) in the following activities. We
performed the activity only by tossing coins and picking among marbles. In tossing coins, the (a)
activity required us to toss the coins 20 times and we recorded 55% for RR and 45% for Rr. The
(b) activity required tossing the coins 100 times and the results were 49%- RR and 61%- Rr. In
the following activities, Probability using Marbles, we had them labeled GREEN as the dominant
trait and YELLOW as the recessive trait. In part 2 of the activity, the (a) activity had a
homozygous recessive. This means 100% recessive traits were obtained. In the (b) activity, we
had 50% - dominant and 50%- recessive dominant. In the (c) activity, we recorded 70%-
recessive and 30%- dominant. We performed five activities in total. We recorded every outcome
in a table and we came up with the general result in every activity. As we went on with the
activity, we made a Punnett square and came up with the same result as what we had on the
data table.
I. INTRODUCTION
An Austrian priest named Gregor Mendel entered the 19th century's ferment of
genius who lived in an earlier era, and his contemporaries had no idea how
important his discovery of the laws of heredity was. Mendel proved that
characteristics from different parents can coexist in hybrid offspring and then
separate and assort randomly into reproductive entities. Mendel later gained
recognition for understanding genes and how they pass on traits, despite the fact
Summer 2007)
Like most farmboys, he enjoyed helping his father with his fruit trees and bees as
he was growing up. He carried on this interest in gardening and beekeeping into
his later years. The young and talented lad had to struggle to get through high
school and junior college since his parents, although not indigent in comparison
autobiography, he stated that he finally came to the conclusion that "it had
name of He discovered the required resources, time, and pleasant company here.
He developed here between the years 1843 and 1865, becoming the renowned
February evening in 1865, a group of men were making their way through the
streets of Bruenn toward the modern school, a sizable, brand-new structure. One
of those men, stocky and somewhat corpulent, friendly-looking, with a high brow
and piercing blue eyes, was carrying a manuscript under his arm while wearing a
tall hat, a long black coat, and trousers tucked in top boots. This was Professor
Gregor Mendel from the contemporary school, who was traveling with some
Because they focused on the behavior of the type of the species or races as a
whole rather than being satisfied with one or two distinct features, Mendel's
hybridization on specific characters rather than, as his forebears had done, just
(Mendel, about fifty-two years old and very stout, enters the auditorium dressed
as an abbot in a long, black robe trimmed in white at the collar and cuffs; he
wears 19th-century spectacles with oval lenses, narrow frame, and wire-like
temples; a crucifix hangs from his neck, and he carries a small book (the volume
des He's puffing on a cigar. He strides quickly to the podium, sets the book and
cigar down, nods, and grinned at the crowd. He has a strong German accent
when he speaks.) Green God. The father Mendel is here. I'll talk about
developed an interest in the heredity of plants and animals. My father always had
flowers in his yard in addition to his horses, cows, chickens, bees, peas, and
beans. I was a curious and untamed youngster who was interested in plant and
animal reproduction. I often wondered why the progeny resembled their parents
but were never precisely like them. In the Heizendorf school, which had only
youngsters in the past were not taught to read or write. Because they were
peasants, the people could not afford to send their children to school. I learned a
lot from my teacher, including how to raise fruit and keep bees. (Richard M.
Eakin)
lifetime and, in fact, until the turn of the century, which accounts for his special
place in scientific history. Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erich von Tschermak,
publication, and gave him a priority. (VitezslavmOrel and Daniel L. Hartl, 1994)
Gregor Mendel published his research on the genetics of garden peas over 150
years ago (Mendel, 1866). Now that this important book is available in an English
translation, we may examine it (Mendel, 1965). using the lens of the twenty-first
how proteins are encoded by genes and influence phenotype. Mendel looked at
seven genes in pea varieties he collected from mosome 1. Green immature peas
are present in all pea plants. As part of the ripening process, four extensively
conserved plant enzymes as well as other enzymes unique to various plant
groups are needed to break down the chlorophyll in the immature peas
(Hortensteiner, 2006). When the chlorophyll is in Figure 3's third phase of the
2007). The peas' chlorophyll is not broken down when this gene is defective,
which prevents the production of functional PAO and keeps the peas' green color.
This is known by botanists as the "remain green" phenomenon. Since the PAO
a distinct chromosome and that dominant genes are more prevalent among
farmers in what is now Bro in the Czech Republic. When a pea breaks down, the
The linkage map of peas depicts these genes. It is tempting to believe that the
other is because Mendel utilized seven genes and peas have seven pairs of
chromosomes. This is especially true considering that Mendel stated that the
One of the most significant ongoing issues in the history of genetics is presented
by the Gregor Mendel case. How could a succession of excellent studies that
were carried out over years and formed the groundwork for the contemporary
secrecy of the publishing, the researcher's low standing, the immaturity of the
issue, and the incorrect interpretation of the findings. All of these alternatives lack
met with such disdain and then faded into obscurity for 35 years. Since Mendel's
course, we have no way of knowing how many scientists really read his paper
when it was first published, and we have very charitably pardoned our forebears
for failing to recognize its significance by presuming that only a select number of
works, who founded the field of genetics. However, his new work is progressing,
and preparations are being made for a Mendel Centennial in Brno in 1965. His
dreams and ambitions for a major Mendel Institute for the study of the history and
philosophy of biology have not come to fruition. (J.W Boyes and B.C Boyes, June
1962)
In Munich, Carl Erich Correns (1864–1933) studied under botanist Carl von
Nägeli. He continued his scientific career after finishing his dissertation in 1889
and remained there as Privatdozent for the following ten years. In 1902, he was
named an extraordinary professor in Leipzig, and in 1909, he moved to Münster
The majority of Darwin's work between January 1863 and May 1865 was devoted
to illuminating the origins of heredity. Since January 1860, he had been working
on The Variation of Plants and Animals under Domestication (1868). His focus
steadily shifted away from the empirical part of this research during the first three
years.
from the ical world of the variants themselves to the methods used to produce
his friend and colleague Thomas Henry Huxley, was the result of his discontent
with previous theories as well as his own work and observation (1825-1895).
(Peter J. Vorzimmer)
If Mendel's research had been done before Darwin's, the outcome would not
Darwin, and this was primarily due to the later refinement of Darwin's concepts
by Galton and others. One is forced to draw the conclusion that Mendel was
was incompatible with the scientific paradigm of his day. Mendel, like Darwin,
was a conceptual inventor with a very original way of thinking about species, and
up until 1900, his work couldn't have been included into the larger body of
biological theory.
Mendel's thought process was, in one crucial regard, more like to that of a farmer
genetics, which occurred in the 1930s and 1940s, would have occurred much
earlier if Darwin had been aware of Mendel and his work, is the typical response
to the issue presented by the title. Furthermore, it almost happened: all Darwin
had to do was tear out the pages from the offprint of Mendel's book from his
library and read them! Or, suppose Mendel had visited Darwin at his home in the
suburbs or ran across him in London! (in connection with Mendel's visit to the city
and March 8, 1865, were based on eight years of research on the hybridization of
the edible pea (Pisum sativum) . These addresses were published in 1866 and
other plant species. This report made the outcomes of his finished experimental
parental characters may have one of three effects on the progeny. In the most
common scenario, the characteristics that distinguish the parents may appear so
intricately merged in the offspring that each young animal or plant appears
to resolve its body into separate elements, some of which resemble one parent,
and some of which resemble the other, at this time. (Br W. F R Weldon,
unknown how this process works. Gregor Mendel published the findings of his