HASIL UJI STATISTIK

Frequencies

Statistics
Jenis Peran Peran Kepuasan
Ruangan Umur Pendidikan Pekerjaan
Kelamin Care Giver Educator Pasien
Valid 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49
N
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

Ruangan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Mawar 29 59,2 59,2 59,2
Valid Melati 20 40,8 40,8 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Umur
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
14 - 20 Tahun 8 16,3 16,3 16,3
21 - 30 Tahun 7 14,3 14,3 30,6
31 - 40 Tahun 9 18,4 18,4 49,0
Valid 41 - 50 Tahun 8 16,3 16,3 65,3
51 - 60 Tahun 5 10,2 10,2 75,5
> 60 Tahun 12 24,5 24,5 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Jenis Kelamin
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Laki-laki 29 59,2 59,2 59,2
Valid Perempuan 20 40,8 40,8 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Pendidikan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Tidak Sekolah 2 4,1 4,1 4,1
SD 6 12,2 12,2 16,3
Valid SMP 15 30,6 30,6 46,9
SMA 26 53,1 53,1 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0
 Pekerjaan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Tidak Bekerja 10 20,4 20,4 20,4
Petani 7 14,3 14,3 34,7
Wiraswasta 28 57,1 57,1 91,8
Valid
PNS 1 2,0 2,0 93,9
Pensiunan 3 6,1 6,1 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Peran Care Giver

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Kurang 6 12,2 12,2 12,2
Valid Baik 43 87,8 87,8 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Peran Educator
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Kurang 21 42,9 42,9 42,9
Valid Baik 28 57,1 57,1 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Kepuasan Pasien
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Kurang Puas 28 57,1 57,1 57,1
Valid Puas 21 42,9 42,9 100,0
Total 49 100,0 100,0

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Peran Care Giver *
49 100,0% 0 0,0% 49 100,0%
Kepuasan Pasien
Peran Educator * Kepuasan
49 100,0% 0 0,0% 49 100,0%
Pasien
Peran Care Giver * Kepuasan Pasien

Crosstab
Kepuasan Pasien Total
Kurang Puas Puas
Count 6 0 6
Kurang Expected Count 3,4 2,6 6,0
% within Peran Care Giver 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
Peran Care Giver
Count 22 21 43
Baik Expected Count 24,6 18,4 43,0
% within Peran Care Giver 51,2% 48,8% 100,0%
Count 28 21 49
Total Expected Count 28,0 21,0 49,0
% within Peran Care Giver 57,1% 42,9% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5,128a 1 ,024
Continuity Correction b
3,328 1 ,068
Likelihood Ratio 7,338 1 ,007
Fisher's Exact Test ,031 ,027
N of Valid Cases 49
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
For cohort Kepuasan
1,955 1,460 2,617
Pasien = Kurang Puas
N of Valid Cases 49

Peran Educator * Kepuasan Pasien

Crosstab
Kepuasan Pasien Total
Kurang Puas Puas
Count 15 6 21
Kurang Expected Count 12,0 9,0 21,0
% within Peran Educator 71,4% 28,6% 100,0%
Peran Educator
Count 13 15 28
Baik Expected Count 16,0 12,0 28,0
% within Peran Educator 46,4% 53,6% 100,0%
Count 28 21 49
Total Expected Count 28,0 21,0 49,0
% within Peran Educator 57,1% 42,9% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3,063a 1 ,080
Continuity Correction b
2,127 1 ,145
Likelihood Ratio 3,124 1 ,077
Fisher's Exact Test ,144 ,072
N of Valid Cases 49
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
2,885 ,866 9,609
Educator (Kurang / Baik)
For cohort Kepuasan
1,538 ,951 2,489
Pasien = Kurang Puas
For cohort Kepuasan
,533 ,250 1,139
Pasien = Puas
N of Valid Cases 49