Horizon Lawsuit
Horizon Lawsuit
Horizon Lawsuit
Plaintiff,
examination and inquiry conducted by and through his counsel, except as to those allegations
pertaining to Plaintiff, which are alleged upon personal belief, alleges the following for his
Complaint:
1. Plaintiff brings this action against Horizon Therapeutics Public Limited Company
(“Horizon” or the “Company”) and its corporate directors for violating Sections 14(a) and 20(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78n(a), 78t(a), and
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 14a-9, 17 C.F.R. §240.14a-9 (“Rule 14a-
9”), in connection with the proposed acquisition of the Company by Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”).1
2. On December 11, 2022, the Company entered into a Transaction Agreement (the
“Transaction Agreement”) with Amgen and Amgen’s wholly owned subsidiary Pillartree Limited
1 The proposed acquisition of the Company described herein is referred to as the “Proposed
Transaction.”
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 2 of 15
(“Acquirer Sub”). The Transaction Agreement provides that Company stockholders will receive
3. The Company’s corporate directors subsequently authorized the January 23, 2023,
filing of a materially incomplete and misleading Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement (the
“Proxy Statement”) with the SEC. The Proxy Statement, which recommends that Company
stockholders vote their shares in favor of the Proposed Transaction, omits or misrepresents
material information necessary and essential to that decision. Defendants authorized the issuance
of the false and misleading Proxy Statement in violation of the Exchange Act.
4. It is imperative that the material information omitted from the Proxy Statement is
disclosed to the Company’s stockholders prior to the forthcoming stockholder vote on the
Proposed Transaction, so that they can properly exercise their rights, among other things.2
5. For these reasons and as set forth in detail herein, Plaintiff seeks to enjoin
Defendants from taking any steps to consummate the Proposed Transaction unless and until the
material information discussed below is disclosed to the Company’s stockholders or, in the event
the Proposed Transaction is consummated, to recover damages resulting from the defendants’
6. This Court has jurisdiction over the claims asserted herein for violations of Sections
14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder pursuant to
Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question
jurisdiction).
2 The stockholder vote on the Proposed Transaction currently is scheduled for February 24, 2023.
2
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 3 of 15
7. Personal jurisdiction exists over the defendants because each defendant either
conducts business in or maintains operations within this District, or is an individual with sufficient
minimum contacts with this District so as to make the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court
are found or are inhabitants or transact business in this District. Horizon’s common stock trades
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, which is headquartered in this District, rendering venue in
THE PARTIES
9. Plaintiff is, and has been at all times relevant hereto, the owner of Horizon common
stock.
10. Defendant Horizon is a public company registered in Ireland, with its principal
executive offices located at 70 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, D02 E2X4, Ireland. Horizon’s
shares trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “HZNP.” Founded in
commercialization of medicines that address critical needs for people impacted by rare,
autoimmune, and severe inflammatory diseases. Horizon operates in two reportable segments:
Orphan and Inflammation. As of September 30, 2022, the Company’s commercial portfolio
includes 12 medicines in the areas of rare diseases, gout, ophthalmology, and inflammation.
Within its Orphan segment, Horizon markets TEPEZZA (teprotumumab-trbw) for intravenous
granules for oral use, ACTIMMUNE (interferon gamma-1b) injection for subcutaneous use,
3
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 4 of 15
BUPHENYL (sodium phenylbutyrate) tablets and powder for oral use, QUINSAIR (levofloxacin)
solution for inhalation, and UPLIZNA (inebilizumab-cdon) injection for intravenous use. In
addition, within its Inflammation segment, Horizon markets PENNSAID (diclofenac sodium
topical solution) for topical use, DUEXIS (ibuprofen/famotidine) tablets for oral use, RAYOS
magnesium) delayed-release tablets for oral use. The Company also has several collaboration
Immune Sciences, Inc., Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Xeris
11. Defendant Timothy P. Walbert is has been Chairman of the Board and President,
Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company at all times relevant hereto.
12. Defendant Michael Grey is and has been the Lead Independent Director of the
13. Defendant William F. Daniel is and has been a director of the Company at all times
relevant hereto.
14. Defendant Jeff Himawan is and has been a director of the Company at all times
relevant hereto.
15. Defendant Susan Mahony is and has been a director of the Company at all times
relevant hereto.
16. Defendant Gino Santini is and has been a director of the Company at all times
relevant hereto.
17. Defendant James Shannon is and has been a director of the Company at all times
relevant hereto.
4
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 5 of 15
18. Defendant H. Thomas Watkins is and has been a director of the Company at all
19. Defendant Pascale Witz is and has been a director of the Company at all times
relevant hereto.
20. Defendants identified in paragraphs 11-19 are collectively referred to herein as the
SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
Summary
• The Acquisition values the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital
of the Company at approximately $27.8 billion on a fully diluted basis and
implies an enterprise value of approximately $28.3 billion.
5
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 6 of 15
• Amgen has entered into a Bridge Credit Agreement, dated December 12, 2022,
for an aggregate amount of $28.5 billion, by and among Amgen, Citibank N.A.,
as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, and
Citibank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. as lead arrangers and book runners,
and the other banks from time to time party thereto to finance, together with
Amgen’s own cash resources, the Acquisition. Further information on the
financing of the Acquisition will be set out in the Proxy Statement (which will
include the Scheme Document).
“In nearly 15 years, we have built one of the fastest growing and most respected
companies in the biotechnology industry from the ground up. We have
accomplished a tremendous amount for patients, their families and our customers,
and created significant value for shareholders. These accomplishments are all
rooted in our employees’ deep commitment, dedication and personal passion for
those impacted by rare, autoimmune and severe inflammatory diseases. Amgen is
aligned with that commitment and passion and will continue to maximise the value
of the current portfolio and pipeline and accelerate the ability to reach more
patients globally.”
“The acquisition of Horizon is a compelling opportunity for Amgen and one that is
consistent with our strategy of delivering long-term growth by providing innovative
medicines that address the needs of patients who suffer from serious diseases.
Amgen’s decades of leadership in inflammation and nephrology, combined with
our global presence and world-class biologics capabilities, will enable us to reach
many more patients with first-in-class medicines like TEPEZZA, KRYSTEXXA and
UPLIZNA. Additionally, the potential new medicines in Horizon’s pipeline strongly
complement our own R&D portfolio. The acquisition of Horizon will drive growth
in Amgen’s revenue and non-GAAP EPS and is expected to be accretive from
2024.”
Amgen believes that there is a compelling strategic and financial rationale for
undertaking the Acquisition, which is expected to deliver the following benefits:
6
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 7 of 15
• Generates robust cash flow (approximately $10 billion combined over twelve
months through Q3 2022)[1] to support capital allocation priorities, including
ongoing investment in innovation and continued dividend growth while
sustaining a commitment to an investment grade credit rating;
• Having taken into account the relevant factors and applicable risks, the
Company Board, which has been so advised by Morgan Stanley, which as
financial advisor to the Company Board has rendered a fairness opinion,
considers the terms of the Acquisition as set out in this Announcement to be
fair and reasonable. In providing its advice to the Company Board, Morgan
Stanley has taken into account the commercial assessments of the Company
Directors. The Company Board has unanimously determined that the
Transaction Agreement and the Transactions, including the Scheme, are
advisable for, fair to and in the best interests of, the Company Shareholders.
7
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 8 of 15
Advisors
• Amgen’s lead financial advisor in respect of the Acquisition is PJT Partners and
its financial advisor is Citigroup. Amgen’s legal advisors are Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP and William Fry LLP.
22. The Board caused to be filed the materially incomplete and misleading Proxy
Statement with the SEC on January 23, 2022. The Proxy Statement, which recommends that
Horizon stockholders vote their shares in favor of the Proposed Transaction, fails to disclose
8
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 9 of 15
information, concerning: (a) the financial forecasts for the Company and Amgen; (b) the financial
analyses that support the fairness opinion provided by the Company’s financial advisor Morgan
Stanley & Co. LLC (“Morgan Stanley”); and (c) potential conflicts of interest faced by the
Company’s additional financial advisor J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan”).
Material Misrepresentations and/or Omissions Concerning the Financial Forecasts for Horizon
23. The Proxy Statement fails to disclose material information concerning the financial
forecasts for Horizon, including the “unlevered free cash flows projected to be generated by
Horizon’s existing products and product candidates for fiscal years 2023 through 2037” utilized
by Morgan Stanley in connection with its Sum-of-the-Parts Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, how
the unlevered free cash flows were calculated, and the underlying projection line items for
24. The Proxy Statement further fails to disclose Horizon management’s “probability
of success risk adjusted estimates of the net revenue generated from TEPEZZA, KRYSTEXXA,
related operating expenses, in each case for fiscal year 2023 through fiscal year 2037” relied upon
25. With respect to the Company’s “Horizon Projections,” the Proxy Statement fails to
disclose all line items underlying the Company’s Unlevered Free Cash Flows.
26. In addition, the Proxy Statement fails to disclose a summary of the prior sets of
Horizon management’s projections utilized or reviewed by Morgan Stanley and the Board in
connection with the sale process, or a description of the revisions made to the previous projection
9
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 10 of 15
set(s), including with respect to Horizon’s risk-adjusted long range plan, which had been reviewed
by the Horizon Board at its regular board meeting in July 2022 and was utilized by Morgan Stanley
in connection with the October 16, 2022 Board meeting. See id. at 8.
27. The Proxy Statement also fails to disclose material information concerning Morgan
28. With respect to the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis performed by Morgan Stanley,
the Proxy Statement fails to disclose: (a) the respective terminal values for each existing medicine
or medicine candidate; (b) the allocation of cost of goods sold based on Horizon management
estimates; (c) the allocation of selling, general and administrative expenses and research and
development costs based on Horizon management allocations; (d) cash flow items allocated as a
percentage of net sales based on Horizon management guidance; and (e) the Company’s fully
29. With respect to the Precedent Transactions - Premia Paid Analysis performed by
Morgan Stanley, the Proxy Statement fails to disclose the identities of the companies analyzed and
the individual premiums observed for each company analyzed by the financial advisor.
30. With respect to Analyst Price Targets analysis performed by Morgan Stanley, the
Proxy Statement fails to disclose the individual price targets observed and the sources thereof.
10
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 11 of 15
31. The Proxy Statement fails to disclose material information concerning potential
conflicts of interest faced by the Company’s additional financial advisor J.P. Morgan, including,
with respect to J.P. Morgan’s engagement, the Proxy Statement fails to disclose: (a) how much
compensation J.P. Morgan has received or will receive in connection with its engagement for its
services provided to Horizon; (b) how much J.P. Morgan’s compensation that is contingent upon
consummation of the Proposed Transaction; and (c) whether J.P. Morgan has performed any
services for any parties to the Merger Agreement in the prior two years and, if so, the nature of the
“Horizon Unaudited Prospective Financial Information,” “Opinion of Morgan Stanley & Co.
LLC,” and “Background of the Transaction” sections of the Proxy Statement materially incomplete
33. Absent disclosure of the foregoing material information prior to the vote on the
Proposed Transaction, Plaintiff and the other stockholders of the Company will be unable to make
a sufficiently informed decision in connection with the Proposed Transaction and are thus
threatened with irreparable harm warranting the injunctive relief sought herein.
COUNT I
Claims for Violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 Promulgated
Thereunder Against the Individual Defendants and Horizon
34. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the preceding allegations as if fully set forth herein.
11
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 12 of 15
35. The Individual Defendants disseminated the false and misleading Proxy Statement,
which contained statements that, in light of the circumstances under which they were made,
omitted to state material facts necessary to make the statements therein not materially misleading,
in violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9. Horizon is liable as the issuer
of these statements.
36. The Proxy Statement was prepared, reviewed, and/or disseminated by the
Individual Defendants. By virtue of their positions within the Company, the Individual Defendants
were aware of this information and their duty to disclose this information in the Proxy Statement.
37. The Individual Defendants were at least negligent in filing the Proxy Statement
38. The omissions and false and misleading statements in the Proxy Statement are
material in that a reasonable stockholder will consider them important in deciding how to vote on
the Proposed Transaction. In addition, a reasonable investor will view a full and accurate
disclosure as significantly altering the total mix of information made available in the Proxy
39. The Proxy Statement is an essential link in causing Plaintiff and the Company’s
40. By reason of the foregoing, defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act
41. Because of the false and misleading statements in the Proxy Statement, Plaintiff is
threatened with irreparable harm.
COUNT II
42. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the preceding allegations as if fully set forth herein.
12
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 13 of 15
43. The Individual Defendants acted as controlling persons of Horizon within the
meaning of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as alleged herein. By virtue of their positions as
officers and/or directors of Horizon and participation in and/or awareness of the Company’s
operations and/or intimate knowledge of the false statements contained in the Proxy Statement,
they had the power to influence and control and did influence and control, directly or indirectly,
the decision making of the Company, including the content and dissemination of the various
44. Each of the Individual Defendants was provided with or had unlimited access to
copies of the Proxy Statement alleged by Plaintiff to be misleading prior to and/or shortly after
these statements were issued and had the ability to prevent the issuance of the statements or cause
them to be corrected.
45. In particular, each of the Individual Defendants had direct and supervisory
involvement in the day-to-day operations of the Company, and, therefore, is presumed to have had
the power to control and influence the particular transactions giving rise to the violations as alleged
herein, and exercised the same. The Proxy Statement contains the unanimous recommendation of
the Individual Defendants to approve the Proposed Transaction. They were thus directly involved
46. By virtue of the foregoing, the Individual Defendants violated Section 20(a) of the
Exchange Act.
47. As set forth above, the Individual Defendants had the ability to exercise control
over and did control a person or persons who have each violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange
Act and Rule 14a-9, by their acts and omissions as alleged herein. By virtue of their positions as
13
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 14 of 15
controlling persons, these defendants are liable pursuant to Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. As
a direct and proximate result of defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff is threatened with irreparable harm.
including injunctive relief, in her favor on behalf of Horizon, and against defendants, as follows:
concert with them from proceeding with, consummating, or closing the Proposed Transaction,
unless and until defendants disclose the material information identified above that has been omitted
C. Directing the Individual Defendants to file a Proxy Statement that does not contain
D. Awarding Plaintiff the costs of this action, including reasonable allowance for
E. Granting such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
14
Case 1:23-cv-00690 Document 1 Filed 01/26/23 Page 15 of 15
JURY DEMAND
15