Qip QSB v4.2 - Trad P Anotaçôes Rev02
Qip QSB v4.2 - Trad P Anotaçôes Rev02
Qip QSB v4.2 - Trad P Anotaçôes Rev02
Check, during the audit, the full report of last external audit.
For a new
Check before or greenfield
the audit ifsupplier the self:-evaluation is present and yearly
updated in PSA IT systems.
those documents (E.g. : SQM, MLP, GP5+, GP12...)
Check
Supplier if the result of this evaluation is in line with supplier KPI (issue,
Check :- contact details are properly identified in Amadeus (Quality &
Logistics)
- Did the supplier & MKA system identify gaps to meet QSB+ requirements and PSA
-annual Flood targets
risks: walls, polders, computer and electric installation raised at
sufficient level, … targets letter) and implement corrective action plan
(see
-- Earthquake:How risky situations anti-seismic are escalated
protectionto top management
-- Use of weak signals
Ask for the procedure and Check on process issues:
an example increase of breakdowns,
disruption (tier 2 delivery/machine’s
- Assess robustness of cyber-attacks mitigation spare part), plan: network access
restriction,
Ask for the banned insurance USB, use of audit
company fake messages
reports. from IT team.
documentation of a tiered supplier selection process.
-- If selectioncriteria
Escalation is done(e.g.: centrally,Controlledcheck Shipping,
tier X status TopisFocus,
knownNew by Business
Hold
- Verify etc.) that incoming inspection covers key and pass through
characteristics, frequencies are reasonable.
With : Quality Manager and inspection leader.
- Verify: content
Check - of 5 whys prepared for customer complaint with problem
- In case of delays, the implementation of an action plan
-Ask Theifaction
top risks plan is efficient
chart or equivalent : re-convergence
(based on priority) is managed. is followed.
Where
Check :-: In meeting room
With : Quality Manager
- Red suppliers on 'supplier approved list' & Project Manager
Check
- Actions
Where that : improvement.
: Informeeting room
- APQP
With : Quality Manager milestones are taken
& Project intoManager-
account inCheck the supplier
site managementdevelopment
plan.
organization chart. - Check project responsibility, site contact part of it.
Where
-Verify
Where Coherence :: In
In meeting
between
meeting room
room the planning and chronomap.
Check
With if
that the supplier
resources quality/project
available to follow manager the is
projectstrained of to
the PSA
plantAPQP
are
-approach
With PCPA:: Quality
: Focus Manager
Quality on schedule
Manager & Project
&general
Project Manager
of installation
Manager andCheck validation
whether ofnewnewproject
"coherent.
Check
equipment/tools
requires thatCheckthe that
supplier the performs
(injection mould, stamping
new facility/equipment/tool
training
a continuous
etc.
plan of
tooling,
- Check
the
follow plantup
decoration
process
is
of updated
the
forneeded
&
tooling,
strictly
product
assembly followed
& process
devices...) in qualification
order
, to permit
including of : - to
their
maintenance integrate
tier 2, new skills
particularly
resources for critical for
Where
identification
new : In meeting
processes of(e.g. room
needs(yc
new PSA specific
model soldering standards
process if...).
any) - toCheck that
components
- Capabilities
With
qualification: Quality or processes
progress
Manager
process of& CSE
includes Projectcomply Manager
an internal withprocess
the schedule audit at reach the
the required
before
target
-
Tooling
steps of
Supplier qualified
and reviews
machines people
and gates
are (in skills
take
final/mass matrix)
into account
production for the
tier SOP
ones,2 of the
(planning
and project.
they of the
are
"Check that a(yc
qualification lessoncheck learned
lists) PCPAsystem self is in place. Cross-check
assessment is done by with
theRR"supplier
tier
installed
- transfer
for 2 is consistent
final on
of their with
final
responsibilities
qualification tier 1between
location.
approval. planning
Check project andprocess
lists PSA milestones)
productionif any are site,applied.
- etc… -
Check- risks athat
Change due new toequipment
tier 2 during and development
its CM inare
documentation identified andrework
forescalation...)
qualification,followed. Ask
Check
Where
to
technicalsee an : of monitoring
it
Indata includes
meeting
example room mode
also
and maintenance.
by(SMpass toprocesses, case of
authorized
operations
With : Quality .... Manager,
For
For - Supplier
all
new new can qualify itsProject
facility/equipment/tools
project orfinal
transfer process Manager,
from anotheronlyorif revamping
tierLogistic
site 2 or new
Manager
qualifications
(manufacturing,
production are line:
"Check
previously
control packaging,
approved
device...), a by orhim.
structured substitution
Otherwise,
approach one, a(5M is suitable
derogation
Ishikawa all along with
isapproach...)
done the is
Where
Check
process : :In
whetherno meeting
part it room
requires
damage new
risks. facility/equipment/tool
Packaging used is validated etc. and
with that
All
action
applied
With the
qualification
key
plans
: and characteristics
to verify
Quality and countermeasures
compliance
Manager
process is
are
& Project
aligned
deployed
withwith (e.g. into
specifications
Manager
the
documentation
:product/process
quality (capability
wall untilchanges. andPSA
(PFMEA,
qualification
capacity)
(static
Control
is
of accepted)
equipment. Plan dynamic
and validations
In working
the case tests
instructions,
of togages, have been
packaging
itasalso integrates done and
andequipment corresponding
labelling)
Prepare
results are some number
conform).' parts
Check : to
- Antake example example. of Check
packaging. drawing
-audit
Test and
result
Check- Check
calibration.
associated operation
the PCPsupplier including
(DEVIN) process
. In derivate
case qualify
on flows
OV tier
part, (e.g.
2: Rework)
is
check there OV an are
SQMS included
for selfin
orlatest
Check
(static
all all
& the key
dynamic)."
documentation. characteristics deployment into documentation
audit
revision level
(PFMEA, required ?, which evidences are required.
CP and working instructions), verify their control effectiveness.
-Ask Check
take how pass
examples
operators through
of
about tier key characteristics
2 qualifications
awareness of key characteristics. are identified in the supplier
Technical
documents
specifications forwarded to Tier X including list of critical characteristic
Milestone,
Check escalation, sub-planning associated
(PCP). if:-
Check
they
Supplier arequotation
identified in the
file supplier
including control plan (e.g.feasibility.
technical/process incoming
reception
Check :- of or further steps in the tier 1 process) and if the frequency is in
line- In case delays, the implementation of action plan .
--That In with
case action
the risks. Crosscheck
of delays,
plan are theefficient with Inbound
implementation : Convergence
ILG1 plan .
of action follow-up.
-Check:-
- That
Follow-upaction ofplanhuman are resources
efficient : and Convergence
skills dedicated follow-up. to the project.
--Conformity
Progress of of Key capabilities
characteristics results compliance during project phase is
Short
Cross communication
check
done according withtoMCE2 PSAmeeting and CMG22
requirements in suitable (see CSE environment
trajectory (everyone
required can
in
Evidence
hear and of each
see criteria
the meeting), should be reviewed with the owner at the FR
APQP
meeting. deliverables and its respect)
Meeting take into account daily/ weekly :
On
An
Securityboard(Accident/pre-accident,
ongoing wecontrol
can find : Open
related todate,
planning owner,
Quality versus description
(significantcurrent of claim,
production
external and due shall
date,
be containment...
established and monitored.
internal issues...), Cost (rate of scrap...), Delay (deviation between
All
Status exitof
production criteria
theforecastfor each
station step
is clearly
and have
displayed
the quantity...) a due (e.g. date and are
visual
Management statused
management
(team, managing
Cross
accordingly
manually check or (e.g.
(Red, with
Yellow,
automatically operator)
Green)
like a iftraffic
escalation
red items
light, haveprocedure
showinga planned contains
datesuch support
to go
change,
Check
for if
answers: project
the Gemba phase...)
walk Layer
is audit (scheduling,
performed daily by mainif deviation...).
manager
events as
green
set up with next steps.
/deviation, ongoing Problems are not closed
error proofing failure) until all criteria are met.
.We
WhoVerify
Overall can ifstatus
is next Gemba
find: level?
scrap walk
represents
rate, is described
the worst
main events and standardized.
condition
(quality or overall
alert, on going planned timing
Points
When
has been of exceeded.
should
deviation,...), attention
you and keyactivity,
escalate?
breakdown information statusare of recorded.
the station,
If possible,
What
Main do you
events participate
do if be
shall in
yourecorded a Gemba
cannot find
(defects walk with
next found,
level? a manager.
deviations) e.g. tally sheet
How
Check
If do
information you escalate
current or
canhistory
affect(e.g.date
theAndon,if raised
next telephone,
shifts, it has/stop
alarm beprocess
escalation
to passed etc.)
were manage
across and
Are there timeThe
appropriately.
documented. limits
Tally in thereaction
sheet,
manufacturing escalation plan,
leadershipprocess?
shifthas book, FR board
to review theetc.shift book
Is
orthere
equivalent visualat management
the start of communicating
shift, to verify proper the escalation
containment processor in
place across
corrective the facility?
actions are done (e.g. quality alert, temporary work
Visual
instruction,management is in place at all levels of the escalation process.
bypass process...).
Use the problem solving effectiveness template which is part of audit
file.
Check examples of the management for internal and external issues.
Check which tools are used (8D mandatory for external, and at least
Check
similarsome approach examples for internalto verify the correct use of problem solving tools
issues).
(e.g.
Check
Verify 5 Why
examples established
that the actions for true
reoccurrence
and root causes
issues or /reverse
'Top Pareto'. 5 Why).Why previous
action -Ask operators were nothow they
sufficient. aredeadlines
involved are followed by management.
In - Lookexample after the different issues (e.g. quality, logistic, werelevel1 maintenance
KPI's
issues…). for thecheck managementwhy previous of thePFMEA processupdate to be defined notand effective.
monitored
with
-Check this kind of management in the workshop (e.g.: QRQC line,their
Check action
if delays plans on for
the deviations.
problem How
solving does
board the aresupplier
managed monitor
properly 5 why:
process
respect
analysis of and
with ispaper
it appropriate
deadline, convergence
board and robust
report…) curve ine.g. case percentage
in delay. of the deadlines
not met. of response deadlines in fast response board and AMADEUS
Follow-up
"Where
systems :: In the Laboratory
Look Withfor tracking ofManager
: Laboratory the complaints or/andby root cause
Quality Manager (e.g. usage of pareto
-Check
analysis, Quality that :
pieQAN&QEC
graph...)
the capability QAN/QEC. Supplier should have overview of
In
-Document
problem project
Logistic : phase
PR&PP.
classification (PCPA)(pareto). : is verified according to PSA requirements.
Method to must
be used be quickly
is ANOVA available
In IPD and in mass production: select 3 CSE or Drawing CharacteristicsR&R in
with the
a shop
bias floor.
study. See norm A10 at
All
9080for
least the results
all criteria
according areto recorded
(e.g./drawing
PCP %GRR (product
is .set ataudit 25%included),
(not 10%, where nor 30%)) Control Plan
requires.
Ask therecords Records
operator are
to do readable.
the control of 3for CSE.
Check
Check some at the
records station
torequired and look
see consistency nonThe
with
control is done
conformances and with
what the
If
hasthe
right measurement
gage
been and
done. SWI
Askas uncertainty
for the operator inUthe isifreliably
PCP andsample
he knows known,
in thewhat
size
an
control andplan.
frequency.
to evaluation
do in this of
the
The CCSE= IT/2U ratio isCharacteristics
permitted. Thiscontrolled ratio mustare becompliant.
≥ 4 and justified by a
situation.
Look
If
calculationcontrolfor or Drawing
capability
charts
report arestudies
used, ask on CSE or Key drawing
the operator how itCharacteristics
is used (cross check and
Check
Sample
confirm
with that,
PPC22 sizes
that all
to the
and
action
see NOK
frequency
plans
how parts
are
alarm are forproperly
documented
limits eachare identified,
operation
used)to address arerecorded
reasonable
characteristics and
Check
separated
(e.g.: thatfrom
based capabilityproduction
onphaseinternal study data:is done after
process (scrap 1stbox PPAP/FTQ, submission
quality and. Check
quarantine
with
During
that
Selection
area).
low
required
Cross
capability
project
of CSE or
quality
check with (PCPA)
key
walls CNCdrawing
is : scrap,
defined
rework,
characteristics
taking into account
etc.)
(safety and : critical
consistent
-- ask
features) to see arewith
the process
R&R
included study
in thecapabilities
oncapability
some CSEstudy.or Drawing Characteristics
Check Customer if requests (e.g. for PSA : GP12 in project phase ref
(linked
Check
01272_16_00012 tothere
that APQP is deliverables)
a strategy
Capabilities and andto
CS1/CS2
monitor
for
samplingref the the process
qualification
rules
01601_13_00065), are done stability
of andto
the measurement
according ensure
PSA
control
tool
requirements frequencies (Procedure stay in line
Compliance with the PSA
assessment capabilitycriteria targets
ref defined in
the - Customer
PCP.: complaints have to be always covered in verification station
01276_16_00027
(e.g. : quality alerts and that
at the work the capability
station). targets are respected (see
In
PCP). - In masscase of SPC
Production is applied,
(QSB+) controls
: limitsCross check with
are defined in the FR23.
control
charts
There - exit criteria
and
are is defined
managed
trends/patterns with toresults
remove
that would quality
review, indicate walls
analysis,
a and
need and approved
to reaction
recalculate byplanlimits
Quality
Number - Check
Where :ifOn there
of the is a
shop
deviations strategy
floor, open, to
check perform
are a reinforced
results regular of R&R
control
the studies
station
controls (based
in on
project
product- If SPC isclassification,
not in place,tool the supplier
complexity, must have clear
operator rules to review
influence,...)
(GP12)
Where -
analysed Upstream
capabilities and
: At to reaction
or
the in
studies mass
work(regular
review/update process
production
station reviews, is
and defined.
(CS1)
in fast
controls :
in caseresponse
plans of high meeting
(e.g. : ratio
scrap rate,incustomer
-- ask
cascading
Quality to see
Immediate walla reaction
to R&R
tieror2result
area aresuppliers on a key
isclearly
applied onmeasurement
(strongly
identified the recommended).
(operations
shop floor, tooling. What
sequencing
recorded and isand
the
deviation)
complaints,
requirement FTQ
process
to perform internal
changes, a scrap
after
regularly metrics
heavy
R&R ? showing
maintenance,...)
CHECK IATF improvement
Check
visual
escalated
trend, :
management)
in case ofof
reduction deviation
events/defects found. over time.
A- A systematic
Quality
real-time checksquality
followare up wall of(GP12)
included results isisimplemented
in standardized
applied andwork. during
included project
Point, in touch, phase
fast (e.g. listen in
Improvement
It
accordance
and is recommended
count with
inspectionof PSAprocesses
to use
rules
methods QDAS-Solara
(The linked
conditions
are with
tool,for
incorporated. result
using PSAof control
implementing capability this :
response
Cross check meetingwith MMFM2 (bottleneck)
strategies.
ratio
method in (notably
deviation / exit
in control ……) Following inofthe full respect GP12 of
Ratio
control Checkmeasurement a PCATthe
ifplan. including conditions)
equipment the reinforced are
in the
detailed
deviation controls / in has
procedure
control been done
PSA (01272_16_00012). NB: achieving PPAP acceptance status 'A' is
Results
In
notcase of events
of
a sufficient SCP, exitcontrol
or defects
condition card of :the analysis
Performance
GP12 PSA. Graphic, Q chart or
The
Link
report number
with
card scrap quality
(i.e. / process
calendar wallsdays-red/green,
/duration of
deviations rate quality
I-chart wallsetc.) inshowing
place
followed
Periodic
Where
feedback : ?from downstream
process
Production capability processes . In parallel check event
Where : Production
Is
With
under the : efficiency
Operators,
control of
setter,
plant
With : Team or shift leader, operators, setter each team quality
or shift wallleader measured ? (pareto,
Check
Check:-
defects
Check :-the reduction,...
list of block batch
Take
IfStart-up a
SPC controlstart-up
standard instruction
check
is defined for
control byautomatic
the card equipment
/ Measure
following documents cardand (SWIverifyorcontent
check
(from
list). production and maintenance activity).
Where
Ask - Evidence
a set : On upofthe traceability
personshopabout floor between
role. Please parts produced & first-off
perform/simulate part.
a start-up
Check
With
process - Check : identification
backcompare
Quality
and records
Manager (reference,
for-start-up
to start up
Team Leaderlabel,
activities
instruction. date andofverify
issue):- and consider,
Check
Where if: parts used for the set-up are segregated.
whether
Check :- Shop
- Exact date
there floor
isofany - Production
start-upadditional line
documented, damage risk related to first-off part,
With
-storage EP -is:Set-up
Quality
implemented Manager
parameters
or handling.according to the - Team
recorded Leader andPFMEA withinand tolerance,
they are efficient
Check
If first-off
(cross-check :-
- First-off parts
RR1&RR2) result,
-- How parts are re-injected in the flow, check ishow FIFO is
- Inthe
Identification
respected. case frequency
ofof any of error on
EPdeviation
devices proofing
action
shopinitiatedverification
floor areand defined
result
in coherence and
verified.
with the EP
managed
list (is there a risk analysis, consistency with maintenance data,
Where
First-off/last-off : Shop floor - production
parts results comparison). line - Fast Response meeting
- Identification,
With : QualityatManager conservation, Teameasy access, storage, calibration of master
samples- Participate an Error -Proofing Leader
verification, check process and
Check
EP
documentation :
Samples Error Proofing
(masters) malfunction
or referenced is escalated
parts (red to shift book, are
rabbits), FR meeting
clearly
- Claims
etc.
and haveidentified
visually been integrated (marked in EP. by colour), stored properly to protect
-With Records of
: Operators verification (control plan, start-up work instructions)
from
- Work
With
Where unintended
On a workusage
Instructions
: :Operators in a dedicated area.
for verification.
station
To check:: L1
Where Onmaintenance
a work station working instructions.
With
To check : Operators : Recording, procedure, L1 operations are integrated
With
in the: Maintenance
Where
Where :: On
workstation's
Shop floor,manager
a workstation work instructions.
management area.
To check: Room
Where : Deviations maintenance in L1 maintenance records.
With
Where : Quality
: Shop Manager,
floor, managementProduction area.Manager.
To
Check check :- : Action plan, list of the problems in progress, strategy of
With : Quality Manager, Production Manager.
action.
-Check
Where Ask for number of failures.
: Production line
-With Ask
Ask:for actions
Team/shift to improve the failure rate.
-Where for: Office or war roomand quality leader
number leader
of failures.
-With
CheckTracking
- Ask: for : check
Quality of
visual set up
downtime
department/
management time against
pareto
coordinator +target.
scrap rate pareto 3 defects +
of failures.
Check
- Ask :-
check AP.actions to improve this failure rate.
for
- Procedure
Where : Office andorstandard
War room are defined
- Crisis: management
With Quality department/ checklistcoordinator(Including phases timing) is defined and
Where
used. :: Ask
'Check Office theorsupplier
war room for ,evidence of connection to the system
With
- PSA :3MIS
(Spot) Quality
and KPI department/
compare is displayed
with your incoordinator
Fast
collectedResponse data.area
'Check
- suppliers
Verify : Theinternal
with timeline
the KPI's
coordinator is clearly
in relation identified
if they to warranty
know and managed.
the pareto management
of claims/DC (Credit
With
performance are displayed in the Fast Response(E.g.
ask) carrier provider : a contract is formalized : DHL;TNT;
or similar area.Chrono
post…) or by resident.
Where : Office or war room ,
With : Quality
Where : Officedepartment/ or war roomcoordinator ,
Where
'For
Check
With :How
information
: :QualityOffice the or war
this
tier
department/ isroom
1section given ,isfeedback
aligned with
coordinator GP5+ Chap
on warranty issue 4.4resolution
Pre analysis -
With
what :
Take actionsquality
an example department/
are planned/implemented.
of QEC coordinator (Evidence of meetings, analysis,
'Check:
'Where
audit etc.)
Check : if Supplier
: Office
regularor supports
war room
meetings OEM
are, in inplace
determining and theroot target causeare of issue even if
defined
supplied
With
Specific : Quality components department/ appear to be
coordinator within current technical specification
Where
e.g.
- Supplier : technical
controlled Office
revalidates orexpertise
batcheswork with
is available internally/externally so support
station, reduced tolerances
component/assembly to reproduce warranty
problem
With : Quality resolution department/
'Check :and
failure
Where If existing
Office re-evaluates
or war controlsroom current ,coordinator
defined in the suppliers
specification e.g. reducedControltolerances
Plan are
being
until
With Check failure :- mode
: carried
Quality out and are incoordinator
is eliminated
department/ alignment with warranty failure modes
--Cross
/scoring PFMEA
'Check check inthe
: Work
if the PCP PFMEA, is reviewed after warranty issues
standard
Where
-History station
- increase
With Conformity
:
of of
of version
Quality
the thenumber
department/product parts ==>taken Control Plan checks are being carried
Coordinator/Operator
-Where
out increase
and : are the
Meeting in frequency
room
alignment , control
with warranty failure modes in the PFMEA
Check
-- increase :- LPA department/ coordinator
With
If : Quality
Existing
a visual controls/standardised
management is dedicated work/equipment
(Special Totem are in place as
- portable visual
-Check
specified additional
:- characteristics
display).
Where
Cross :
check Meeting with room
PPCxxx ,
If
A the
Where
Where factories
specific :: Office
Shop had
iswork
griddepartment/
floor been
deployed station
(production contacted
, line,and
following theinformed
Ishikawaof
maintenance anylogistics,...)
method
area, potential
With
impact : Quality coordinator
With
With : :-Operators
Check : Quality department/ coordinator/operator
The
Check
Check batch:-
:- meeting has been segregated
If regular are performed with Aftersales
-- Trend Rules are explained to visitors before shop floor audit;
-Where
-QEC Objective
5 : equipment
Safety
Where
-With QEC Office workare
: Production available
station , in the plant for visitors.
-With Check ::4Team before the
leader audit
and
Quality department/ coordinator/operator if the
Quality supplier
leader is OHSAS (or similar) certified
-Where
Check
Check Ask operators,
:: :-Warranty
Shop floor who works
(First
performance on station
in production metricswhere line then safety requirement
maintenance area and
established,
logistics,...).
Where - A standard : Shop about floorawareness
defines layout which
(production of safety
line,includes rules.internal stock
maintenance area, and logistics,...)
-Start
necessary
With Organization
:atTeam buffers
production chart:and
Leader responsibility
line Quality Leader for the safety is defined.
-With
Check Facilities
FIFO is
:-
: Team kept. on site:
Leader infirmary,…Visual
and in Quality explanations/information available
Leader
-Where
Check the::-standards
Safety
Check
On Shop
workplace
shop floor, floor,are firstly
kept e.g.:
organization
appreciate production
PPE,
andlevel
the then
circulation
visualization
of light, in logistics,
onatthe
the shop
several maintenance,
temperature floor, risk
different
Where
laboratory,...
Where:
related(incoming/storage
places
(cold/hot), :toShop
Shop process
the floor
floor
level including
(stamping,
of area,
noise, (production,
melting
thework loads etc.).
stations, logistics,
carried maintenance,
maintenance
by operators, room).
the levelOnly of
laboratory,...)
With
With:
-work
required -Check
Continuous
:(hands
Team
Team onand Leader
shop improvement
Leader floororpotential
regularly Shift
used leader andsafety
equipment, optimization
, logistics
issues leader,
toolse.g.: and/ waste elimination
maintenance
hidden
material corners,
are present
up...).
process
With
leader...
Check:
potential
-in the: work
Look Shift
That
for isaccidents,
init place
leader
area.
result of and
is easy related
for
pedestrian
ergonomics the to
operators workplace
operator
way, colour
evaluation. to confirm organization.
coding that
on thefloor,SWI is to the
noise,
Where if :theShop Workingfloor, firstly in production then in up/changeover
logistics,
Check
latest
-temperature
maintenance,
-5SMethod
audit Controls
revision
Look at a "painful" for
records which
waste
level
etc.. and workstation. Verify its action plan for the from
andinstructions
laboratory,...
are is
verify listed
elimination monitored
actionsin are
isControlat
applied
by the
e.g.
implemented different
Plan(Value
startare for workplaces
added
Stream to
findings. SWI,
Mapping
receiving
efficient
procedure,
VSM,
Where
- Layout
improvement. Signs,7posters is toinlayered
time
:Wastes
In despatch
allocated
onofthe
Verification
coherence audit
lean(rework,
for
shopwith quality
etc.) floor,
stations
the manufacturing,
and checks.
line
regular
onmarking,
workstation. the review
shop quality
behaviour control,
minutes
floor andofare inmaterial
logistic
the
With
-handling/logistic
employees.
'-
available.
Laboratory Try
There
Check :to Team
is perform
a
the
- Cross check with SW12. leader
specific
management etc.,)
an SWI or
manual+ shift
different
process
of leader
operation
the in place
clean , logistics
reference.based
at
room the Is
on leader,
done
shopSWI, on maintenance
check
floor the
to same
all base.
necessary
facilitate
1.
leader...
information,
continuous
With -A Check
process WIimprovement
: Laboratory availability
hint,
is in key placeManagernear
points...
toand ofrevision
improve workstation,
described
and/or to
production to perform
the
Quality SWI output.
Manager operation.
It is based Is on
2There
explanation
Check Ask operator
isthe to explain
of performance
robustness of theatofSWI
several , Standardised
jobshop verify
sufficiently that tothe Major
described
Work Steps,
bythevisual
Instructions KeyMNG
analysis
Check
Points
Where are:-aof process
operational
Check
understood
in place
several gages the
availabilities, floor
operators
in different ensure
area that
suggestions,
(production, training
6 sigmalab,
(photos)?
matrix
(SWI's):- is: updated
In the Laboratory
to reflect the latest SWI revision
techniques
incoming,
-Where Askoperators
few etc.
storage)
operators for:
toManager
explain SWI. Does operator understand
Where:
With
Ask
1.
: :Office
Laboratory
Identification, In theifLaboratory
they participated or/and in the Quality
development Manager of theit? Are
SWI's
they
With:
Where
Check
Evaluate respect
Functional
:
that In
whetherPPE
the and safety
organisation
Laboratory
capability
the SWI's requirements
ofaremeasurement
sufficient available
to means
ensure in SWI? is verified:
repeatability of
With
-2. : the Laboratory
Standardized Manager
work or/and Quality Managerare
Check:
With
Uncertainty
the
Go to : Process
operation
station
Laboratory of and
inmeasurement
place toinstruction
check
Manager ensure all reference for
the update
or/and
means calibration
parts/process
Quality
(U) of
is SWI's
Manager and respected.
in response
appropriate controls.
forarethe Is
to
Check
3
it
quality Calibration
inside in the
theof
alerts, SWI calibration
status
mentioned?
customer and procedures
claims, their record, if the acceptance criteria
Check
tolerance
Does the that SWI's measurement
characteristic
support themeans toPFMEA/Control
highestmeasure exceeding
levels (IT)Plan :a updates, read
calibration
common due
and date
defined.
across,
4.
are Proper
isolated lessons usage inlearnt,and
quarantine benchmarking
storage area (ask an etc.,
operators etc.of safety,
identified about
with
quality
redusage and
label. and
sample
productivity?
Check rule
if: the is to have U ten times more precise than IT (U <=
handling
Where
Parts
0,1* IT). controlled
We of Laboratory
Shop gages,
can floor with
also are use
manageabout
a aware
(production
measurement
R&R method
theline, thermal
risks
maintenance,
means
conditions
of
to check damaged (H°
thelogistics)
having
and T°)
gage).
capability
capability of
during
-not
Where
With List :of calibration
: gages
Shop
Production floor activity.
containsand(production identification
quality line,
leaders and
maintenance, calibration period.
logistics)
measurement
Check ok or
that exceeding mean,
dimensional calibration
PSA results requirement
for due
the gaugedate is must
R&R be
< 30%
are available considered
(see PCP).
in the
- Check
With
Check:-
as suspects. schedule
: Production Pareto offor and calibration.
internal quality and leaders
external issues caused by
calibration
Check:-
workplace report
rate of
organisationpercentage for external/internal
deviations are availablecreated issues
Where that
Check : Production
gauge approvalline and and 5S
laboratory
ensures that all component
by
Standards
With NOK WI.
: Team/shift areCheck clearly pareto
leader defined of claims
and
andtolaboratory caused
understood leader by not well defined
measurements
WI. What was are
the validated
reason of claimconfirm (WI that
not the
good gauge defined,performs to
Check
expectation - Check :inchoose the shopone floor that identification
checking tool and system check of NOK and not
calibration
good
suspected
(internal/external) set parts up, other)? is used + R&R for all areas (incoming, working stations,
controls stations, rework…) and visual management ( identification on
-the Check
floor, and ask operators
labelling, colour how coding) they withmanage production NOK parts team.
- In Askcase
thethe of NOK parts,
operators thatask operators how
identification system it is (e.g.
ensured redall that
tag) previously
is
-produced Check quarantine
parts that are area and
considered NOK boxes.
suspect Are
are they
contained locked
and with
understood.persons list (or equivalent).
authorized
-quarantined Verify
Check Containment thaton the shopWorksheet
non-conforming floor. product contains
is removed all the from potential
the
-locations. List is established with quantities and dates are documented in the
process/manufacturing
- Verify Containment
quarantine area. area to off line
Worksheet contains all the potential designated containment
-areas
locations.Check or that into scrap countermeasures
container. Confirm are put thatinthe placeamount for each is equal alert.
vs
--reportedAsk
Check team value.
that member
countermeasures about containment are put inand place its rules.
for each alert.
---Ask Check inteam
Ask one team member
AMADEUS member about
if the
who first
haswarranty
containment performed batch
and its
label is for
containment
rules.
mentioned
any FR issue, how they did the containment and how they for filled
-- Ask IfCheck
a non oneconformity team member waswho found, hascheck performed containment
if sufficient action was
in
any - the
Check Containment
FRtothat containment
issue, rework how Worksheet.
istheyaction
a part did follow-up
of the
the Process
containment sheet Flow and and Process
how they Controlfilled
taken
Plan.
-inIfthe a non prevent
conformity further
was shipments
found, checkof if nonconforming
sufficient action was parts or
taken
material. Containment Worksheet.
-toCheck
prevent In PFMEA that all potential failure modes of Rework are
- Check
considered. thefurtherprocessshipments of rework of nonconforming
re-introduction andparts
release or material.
- Review
--Check workplace organisation and the potential for parts mixing.
Checkif
-toCheck ifSWI
single standard (standard
operation rework work
limit
instruction)
instruction
of includesis simply
rework/repair/reintroduction markingexplaining
rules. the task
if still
perform
- Check if team and ensures
members repeatability.
understand theberework identification process
NOK after first rework cycle part should scrapped.
and follow on a reworked part. Take a look how it is handled, identified
- Check
and re-introduced in skillsinto matrix the line. that the rework process is included
and performed
- Verification
Check the of KPI's by authorised
concerned by
countermeasure people.
action the(internal
CNC and andaction
external plans
storage
including
implemented. MAF.
- Check the number of containment actions follow-up.
- Is there a target set and an action plan in place to reduce containment
actions?
- All deviations must be followed with date of initialization,
What
closure youand needquantity
: Flow chart; PFMEA;
of parts.
Where : First in work station an second in meeting room
-Best Checkpractice the :deviation follow-up file and how it is reported
-during
- Check if all daily Check the
how operations Fast Response
contamination from and shopfailuremeeting.
floor modes related toincontamination
are described PFMEA (Cross
in
check eachisprocess
build with aredrawing
defined in in control
PFMEA.plant,
Best
Cross Check practice
an example
check : Check
with ofhow PFMEA.
PPC&ILG/OLG) the rework and re usage of component are
-defined - Check inhowarooms
PFMEAthey use the protective
lesson learned to update the generic
- For For clean
QSB+ make autilisation,
focus on carry over parts clothing are defined
for this chapter and and cross
Example
PFMEA
enforced,
Check
check also with MC. if
a ((complaints,
PFMEArework
prioritization observed
example: is last
based project
in
Effectsthe
on workshop…).
PFMEA
defined
evaluated feedback,
approach
from both (e.g. products
combination
customer and of
and
-manufacturing
process
Severity, For painting, changes
Occurrence check
point are ifof
and acascaded
positive
Detection
view, pressure
into
potential the
or Risk isgeneric
cause maintained
Priority PFMEA)
Number
of failure to stop external
etc.).
defined -
contaminants.
Scoring
specifically, - Checkofhow Severity/Occurrence/Detection,
generic PFMEA
ambiguous phrases (e.g., reviews are
operator ratings
managed,
error areorconsistent withif
particularly
machine
-malfunction,
customer
managed Considerguideline the
byetc.)risk should
corporateof mixing notorbe
team foreign
used.
(e.g. material
is Real
there in or onactions
preventive
a defined parts (e.g.
frequency screw
are listed.
to
falls
E.g. -
review generic PFMEA ?) :
Fordown
All
potential in
potential an assembly,
failure
safety and conveyor
mode
warranty are presence
identified
issues , of oil
"Missing
Error ...).
Proofing component";
must be re-
scoring
applied.
Verify Ask supplier after
that action
action how plans they
implementation
are follow
managed thecan'treviews
until change
to reach ofboth
PFMEA
the detection
scoring and
RPN
Verify - Ask to see the
if there aregeneric
actioncontrol and check
plans not last update.
-occurrence
(RPZ(German) Check
When last
severity customer
rating;
orisIPR visual
high and
(French)) complaint,
detection can'tclosed
defined quality
isbe
by re
low,
or issues
highbelow
scored remaining
visual inspection
supplier.- Review
RPN
or modification
7 scoring
aloneafter
is
and
not acceptable.
changes
recommended how the supplier
and actiontheir update ensure
implemented. compliance
in PFMEA. of delivered
Severity quotation should not be parts with
specific
'-
changed
- Check Reviewverification
ifrisk
afterthey reduction
thehave checks:
action. aaction Quality
planning plan, for wall
evaluate
thesein place
that and managed
actions
reviews are defined
(cross
-against Check check
roothow with
causetheyor VS)can oruse
improve usethe of alesson
detection,higher frequency
target
learned dates control
toare kept.orthe
update
complementary
PFMEA controls with a more precise device (e.g. temporary
Ask
systematic supplier 3D how
control, theyspecificuse the non PFMEA
destructive reviews for continuous
testing,...)
-improvement-
There All the is findings
a Reverse CheckarePFMEA driven
an example back
(proactive into Process
approach) Flow, PFMEA,
process in
Control Plan, Work Instructions
place to identify new potential failure modes in shop floor.'- as applicable. (Cross check
with PPC
Check
Check some
updates11&13)examples
after reverse (E.g. PreviousPFMEAissues performed. external/ internal)
Standard form
‘- Ask if Top RPN chart or equivalent (based on or database is used to document Lessons Learned
prioritizing
Where
applied) : Office and / or war room of changes or equivalent,
-With Check ifisthere
: Department
followed arededicated
some review actions/implementation
to monitor changes
-(engineering....)
dates/delays. Check the historical synthesis page of the contingency plan
and
Check risks :- trend chart (pareto, trend and associated reaction
Where
plan) : Office and / or war room of changes or equivalent,
-With Documentation
: Department via example:toa monitor
dedicated design change, changes a process
Where
change, : Office
a tier nand
change, / or war a room of or
transfer changes
an IT or equivalent,
system evolution.
(engineering....)
With : Department dedicated to monitor changes
-Check Check evolution
:- of data system such as MRP system, storage
(engineering....)
management software, EDI server must be consider as major
-Check
Where The procedures
::: Office and and war forms used on site. or equivalent,
changes.
Where - Request Officeto and/ /oror
deliver warroomroom
non-conforming
of of changes
changes
product' or equivalent.
With
-- Check
With :
EvidenceDepartment
thatof
: approval
Department emergency dedicated
customer dedicated to
approvals
changes monitor
toby are
monitor changes
(FETE
taken /FIPA
changes (engineering....)
Amendment)
in account with
'Check
-Where - The
That :-
PSA of
requirement derogations is respected. the Customer
escalation
(engineering....)
--Impacted
Usage : Officerules
of documents andassociated
tool(project /
to ensure or war and
room
traceability specific
of changes timing
of update or
modifications.control.
equivalent,
-With
Where
(e.g.
Check Organization: Office
specific
: Department
:- and dedicated
priority / or team)
are
status &
waridentified
room
intomilestones
the ofMPS
monitor for
changes for (drawing,
theortrial
changes equivalent,
run).
PFMEA,
With - Planning
(engineering....) : Department and
control evidence
plan, dedicated of reviews,
Maintenance
- One of last of modification and verify a feasibility analysisto monitor Plan, SWI,...).
changes
(engineering....)
Check
including
Where ::-Officeleadand time/ or analysis
War room andofall activities
changes to be done (E.g.:
or equivalent,
Check
product - One
With : Department :- and
of lastprocess
of modification toand
re-validation) verify a risk analysis (e.g. by-
Where : Office and /dedicated
or war room monitor
of changes changes
or (engineering....)
equivalent,
pass
With
Check - One of last
processes).
: Department
: of modification and verify
dedicated to monitor changes (engineering....) that break point is
defined
Check - One of :- and the
last offloor proof of communication
modification and verify action in place to cover the (e.g. Irreversible
Where
modification
- Anidentified.
example : Shop of
of tools).
trial run sheetprocesses).
(records).
risk
-Where: Ask and check (e.g. the by-pass
temporary
- During project Shop floor phase, trial runs arework managed instruction
with "correctin regard of the
marking"
deviation
-accordingCheck how request
to PSA theprocess
traceability (see SQM document)
of parts under deviation is
Where
-managed Check : Office
how and
the /batchor warisroom of changes
visually managed or equivalent,
With : Department in production
dedicated area
to monitor changes (engineering....)
With:
-Check
With: Check Quality and
the management engineering of deviation in logistics area
:Quality and engineering
-Check
Check A trial that thatvalidation
run KPIor
KPI orequivalent
equivalent
criteria & results isdefined.
is defined.
(records).
Check if the PARETO
Check that this tracking is coherent with analysis permit to identify
the following the number
of of
issue
With:
derogation generated
Logistics by à change.
and with the incoming inspection status (case of
Check:-
raw material changes).
Where
Where KPI orcheck :equivalent
:Room
Room / shop isfloor
/ maintenancedefined. shop floor
Cross
With with CMGE2
With ::Maintenance
Maintenance Manager
Manager
Check :-
Check
-Where :-
Classification risk/ shop
criteriafloor (safety, bottleneck, process with degraded
Flow chart,: Room Information system, org chart.
mode)
With
- Preventive : Maintenance planning on Manager
selected machine
Where
- Result of intervention area,
Check ::- Maintenance is used to adapt planning
With:
Where
- From Manager
: KPI'S
Room maintenanceof the area
choose equipment and check list of record
'With
Check : Maintenance
(Intervention) :- Manager
Where
Check
Facilities : -: Spare
Room
available parts
maintenance
(areas store well anddefined,spare parts storage
conditions, 5S level, etc.)
-
'With Criteria
: to determine
Maintenance
With : Maintenance Manager the list
Manager
- Choose::-
Where
Check an
: Room equipment
Inventory onand
maintenance verified chosen
reference the list (database vs actual) ,
With
- Condition : Maintenance of storage Manager and 5S
Check
Where
- Obsolescence ::-Tools shopmanagement floor (Are physical inspections
With
-performed : Maintenance
Approach of longManager
forstandardisation term stored (for items
example: ?). use of the same filters,
Check
Safety:-
same interfaces
: crosscheck tools,with etc.).SW
-- List of tools
Sharing of the components or economical optimization of stocks.
-Plating coherent with a list,
Where : Room maintenance/ tools Shop floor
With : Maintenance
Where : Tools shop floor Manager
Choose
With CST and verify
: Maintenance existence of lifetime tracking, process sheet of ctrl
Manager
(methodology)
Where : Room maintenance records
Check :- and maintenance
Storage organization, Storage operations, Storage conditions (5S); CST
With
status: is Maintenance
visible (E.g. : Manager Green : available for production; Red : Need
Check
With
maintenance
Performanceoperation) : :-
Plant Manager,
& reliability Logistics
targetsManager,are defined Manufacturing
on the basis of
-historical
Manager If a procedure data exists
and related with a regular
indicators check of tools end(e.g.
are managed of life.
OEE,
Planning
-Failure
Check Milestones of
:-Rate, maintenance
S&OP are defined
and MPS is managed
are in and followed
alignment, : monitoring
shared with of the
gaps to the MTBF,
planning of MTTR,
maintenance line stops).
(included sub-contracted activities
production team and with tier X Suppliers..
of
Check
Where maintenance).
stock
: Room management metric (Rotation ratio, stock value,
With
ratio :ofsome Logistics
missing Manager,
spare Manufacturing Manager.
Check
Check :- input :- parts).
-With
- OEE : rates
Sequenced Teamis regularly
leader
orders are updated.
available on the shop floor; periodical
-meeting
Check : between production Manufacturing Capacity (Critical equipment is identified,
and logistics
preventive
- Real Equipment production maintenance control
and Resources tasks/time
Availability to start production is taken
in
With
-• Hourly account
: Team
CurrentPerformance and
Leader other
% of utilization production
Sheet to compare theisforecast
downtime taken intoand the
account)
Check
real
•Back-up :-
production
Planned Maintenance
-'With
-•Check -Material
: Team
Management
Reasons
Planned
plans Leader,
forboard
Availabilityeach
for deviations
Manufacturing
bottleneck
isandnear Lead
shall
Manager,are
operations
Time,
aChanges
work
be recorded
Logistics Manager
station defined.
--Where if :- Changeover/Tool
Constraints,
Lay
'With Management
Escalation
out : Room/shop
of
: Manufacturing linevisual
the rules and is in place
inManager,
case
floor
capacity ofmeasure
delay.
Logistics(Link
Manager.with PCAT). Cross check
-With
Where Stock ::Level,
Shop
Where
with
To MMF12 :-Shopfloor
: Manufacturing
check floor Manager, Logistics Manager
-With
Constraint
Output
To Etc.
check is
:- identified
: Manufacturing
is closely monitored
Manufacturing by visual
Manager, with management.
Logistics
explanation
planning and Manager
of the gaps, changes,
production
Where
operators/team
To
measurement check : Shop :- floor leaders
of the gap are trained
between to manage
the forecast the constraint
& current operation
with supporting
With
Management
production. : Responsible documentation
board isfor production
placed close tolines supply line ( following
the production
With
Where
To : Responsible
check ::Shop :- floorreal for production lines supply
the
Where
To production
check :-Roomin/ shop time;
floormanagement of constraint; scrap; action
With:
-plan.....) There Responsible
is a defined forlayout
supplywith of production
flows formalisedlines
-To
With Whether
: Responsible
check the
:- labelling
Existence system
for supply
of Kanbanofisproduction
robust
management lines or similar, delivery of
-To
-Where Existence
The : Room
references of a supply
/ shop offloor plan, suitable equipment
parts
Where
checkfrom : Shop storeand
:- Follow-up to work
floor
quantity
supply
stationofalerts
parts /are
is organised integrated
missing parts
well within the
on planning
visualon
production
good
a dailyExisting
lines, basis escalation rules
management,
- FIFO stock levels are easily identified, how & where
In caseisofrespected
deviation a cause tree is defined and applied (Cross check with
production
Where: Shop floor are initiated is clear
FR3) orders
With
Where
Where : Responsible
:: Room
Shop /floor/room
shop forfloor
scheduling
To check
With :- Monitoring
: Logistics
Logistics person
Manager indicator
in charge of production (actual/planned)
With
Where
To : :Logistics
Ground/room Operator
To check check :-:-Indicator
Existence of the stock levelsor
of MIFA/VSM (thresholds
equivalent, mini/maximum
knowledge ofbythe
Where
lines)
With : Shop person
: Logistics floor (reception area)
method, improvementinplans charge, responsible scheduling
To
Where
To check
check :- :-
:: Ground/room
Monitoring indicator of the bottlenecks
Where Room
-Where layout : Room
of delivery
With
- reception : Logistics "Capacity"Operator, (NumberQuality Manager
trucks / day versus resources).
Where
- a follow-up : Shopoffloor the deliveries (Visual management),
To
- a deliveries check :- planning, levelling of the deliveries
-Existence
- a standard
With The :thresholds
Logistics of sequence
incomingare appropriate
person material
of
inoperations,
charge, to the
control part
plan,
standard (New project,
controls
work of new
With
number
quality
instructions,
Where : Logistics
of
batches,issues….)
: Ground/room Operator,
Conditions
observation Quality
of of
the Manager
containment
operations of
of batches
the full to be
reception
With
Where
-controlled Check : Logistics
: Shop
how - error supplier,
floor
the rules
proofing of sampling
as are
appropriate based on historical
process
To check what :-
Where
There
quality
With : are:andGround/room
Logistics master
parts samples,
qualification
person in regular
charge, status review,
. the tierupdated of new
-To Existence
check :- of a logistic Protocol with N, updated
latest
-Where
regularly, The level
use of design
a
: Ground/room sampled
identification change batch
of thelevel.is Validated
subordinated
thecomponents
signatories /supplier by quality
to the quality
- Existence
department
To check whatopinion.
:- of a list of suppliers with high
-risk, Cross and check
evidence theof scoring
animation with MMOGLECross-check
associated. : chapter 6.3with Supplier
FR
-Check
With Existence
communication : Logistics
if :- ofperson
an(Mandatory
alarmin system
charge, in in the event
MMOGLE) of EDI breakdowns,
meeting
Where
-Where
With backup
Layout : :Logistics
- Medium/Long :Ground/room
solution
Ground/Room
is formalized (ex: e-mail
Manager,term e.g. / fax) Operator
Logistics
quarantine
securing plansarea for , finished
key critical stock,
suppliers
To
-temporary
Where check: that:-
Qualified Shop peoplefloor must be permanently available to etc.,
manage
(e.g.
'Knowledge Safety stock
stocks, (WIP),
of the manual advance suspected
warehouses)
andLogistics
approved by parts, trial
signature. parts, and
EDIcheck
With
To
implemented in: Logistics
all shifts
:- updated Manager, Operator
Document
-Where IT is and regularly transmitted to supply chain
With
-'With theback
:gap
:Logistics
: Shopup solution
between
Logistics Manager,
floor system
Manager, is periodically
Logistics
information
Logistics tested
Operator and actual situation on
Operator
Where
To
the
Standardizecheck :
shop floor Shop floor
:- : Cross check with SW
Check
-WhereExisting
regular if: :- workfloor
physical
Shop instructions,
stock checks visual take management
place to confirm of level
quantities
With: Long
min/max.
and Logistics
adjusttermproduct material
system person in dates
charge,
is identified
expiry
accordingly (ex: temperature, moisture,
Where
-etc.).
- Period
expiring : is
Room defined
dates on forproducts
the long term material FIFO compliance
or packaging,
With
To : Logistics
check:-
- Material Manager,
is still valid, expiryLogistics
date is defined, Operator validated by quality
Where
existence
control : Shop of afloor
KPI and a follow-up of the suppliers logistics
With
Check
performance
- Management: Logistics
the special Manager,
visual characteristics
is in place Logistic Operator
afteridentified
checking compare to ratio
With
Where
inspected : Logistics
: Shop floorManager
characteristic
Where
Check : Shop
:- Causes floor are identified and managed
With
To check : Operational :- logistics,
Where
With : Ground logistics,
: Operational
-Cross
Existence of aMMFM12
truck preparation list for operator
Wherecheck : Ground with
-ToLayout
check:-if :
check of the area,
--Astandard
Visual
Withfollow management
up
: Operational(Including keysboard,
processlogistics,
exists to alert
points) shipping
isthe customer
defined planning is visually
if needed,
and applied, monitoring
Cross check
managed
table,KPI's
with
Where confirm
: Ground (Timehowtable
PR/PPR of preparations
the AVIEXP's are sent of shipping order)
- rules
To check of :- palletization (Following MLP)
- system
Dedicated is compatible
zone is implementedfor mixed pallet preparation
- If a system of scanning is in place instead of tracking the right address.
With : Logistics Manager
Where : Shop floor
To check
With : Logistics : take aManager reference of packaging and verify:-
- Management
Where : Shop floor of minimum/maximum
outside / inside level
- Verify
To checkconsistency:- take a reference betweenofphysical packaging quantity and declared under
and verify:-
-system
With: Protected Logistics againstManager dust, water etc.,
- Layout
With
Where: Verify ifof
: Logistics supplier
Shop the area, knows
Manager
floor 5S, all customer
visual
outside/inside management, location GLE'spackaging
empty (Gestionnaire stockLocal
With
Emballage/Local
level
Where
To : Logistics
check: : Shop Work Operator,
packaging
floor Logistics
manager)
instructions/containment Manager process,
With : Logistics
Where : Room Operator
To
identification
Where check : Room :- //and shop floor
shopvisual floor management
To check :- Sequence compliance for the finished products (shipping
-area
Toindicator check
& loading) :- late delivery empty packaging and traceability of
With:
communication
- Evidence
Total Logistics
Sequence of FMEA,Operator
with OEM (PSA)/Packaging
Compliance = transportation sequence service compliance
supplier
Where
-With
(Truck Action FIFO):plans
Room + / shop
for highest
handling floor
/ RPN
loading sequence compliance (handling units
To : LPA
check:- ListProcess
of potential owner / LPA modes,
degraded LeaderStandard
and thefor production
the
FIFO
With /: Loading
Logistics
Logistics plan)
Operator
person + Packaging
in charge, sequence compliance (packaging units
team
management
FIFO in :the of degraded
handling unit) +modes, Procedure
Parts sequence to replace (Parts
compliance suspectedFIFO parts
in the
To
Where
in
Where check
the: sequence Room :-
: InProcess
meeting flow, existing
room /shop emergency floor / "hospital" stocks
packaging)
With
To
With:-
Labels check:-LPA
Logistics
on products,person owner
on in charge,
packaging, labelling meet the standard
'Check:-
Where Existence ::: In ofmeeting
a KPI room /shop floor
Where
Where
-To If check
the
Room
LPAshop floorand a follow-up of the logistic performances towards
the
Check:- customer if : Sheet(Servicecontains rate, incidents) the 7 required items described in
With:
-Scope
the
Knowledge
Number Logistics
: All
criteria. person
any ofisinthe
operational
ofIfmanagement
of packaging charge,
areas
managed 7ofis take
items andinto
disputes account
isescalated
NOT . : Manufacturing,
covered in the check
Where
logistic,
list,
Crossindicator
This rating
check : maintenance...)
Room must
with be NOK.
DLG13
is taken in account in the MPS preparation process. Cross
To
-Sampling
-check check:-
withcriteria
Safety/ergonomic MMFM12 (frequency,
items: proper
&MMFM13 process,safety operator, shifts…) and
practices : Audit PPE are
Cost
frequency and frequency is defined is(each
tracked operation audited a minimum of
being followed,
once/month)
With
- Skills : LPA matrix Process : Only ownerqualified / LPApeopleLeader are andworking.
the production team
-Where Standard : Insequences
meeting description
room / Shop : floor
how to conduct the LPA (standard
-method Standardized is clearly work
defined : it's
:LPA being
Knowledge strictly
ofshop followed,
standard specific
audited, inform the
SQME
Verify
controls: thatmust LPA attend
related take to the
place
product in on the
alignment
and processwith floor
schedule
key characteristics
operator, take account last result, use check list, observe, record
With
With
What
(CSE),
evaluation :::LPA LPA
customer Leader
Process
Operational
, restore ownerand
(e.g.:
issues,
the the
result) production
production,
low capability team
logistic, sorting,
process, Controlled
special
Where
Where
Shipping,
process
- Description : :In Onmeeting
GP12, the
areofindifferent shop
room
new
place and floor
production lines
being followed.
management level :new
for whoprojects etc.) the LPA
shall perform
Check:-
Check
Who
-(all Start-up:
With : LPA Process if
Manager,
management the production
standard team
level
Leader and : are team
leader....
involved
Includes
owner lead(from
error
the production team really
team the
proofing LPA
leader
checksto and
top follow
and thatup
How
the
management)
When
With
escalation the
: LPA: :prioritisation
schedule. Frequency
Process
rules are isstrictly
was
owner defined
defined with and
applied a top management
respected
in case of failure.
Where Shop floor
On the shop floor on countermeasure sheet
Check
With:
Where- Workplace
'Check
Check :back
Production
In meeting
that
that, LPA
in therecords,
team
roomsheet,
organization:
containment LPA managerverifyit isthat
standards
actions inare the
used audits
shop
are were
floor:
asmaintained,
immediately
the really
recordtaken proper
in
mode
performed
-
check:- Check
tools, gages
account
described that according
inand thequalification
and materials
ifsheet.
the to
deviationsschedule
levels are
are available and all
clearly
are corrected the
& used, operational
defined:
duringqualitythe checks,
audit
Check
-activities
FIFO, If LPA
Check ifmaterial
the
findings
if in flexibility
were
qualification/training/certification audited
to
thehandling,
LPA Chart
implement
sheet (notdefines
weonly for
continuous
standard use each
in
the operator
manufacturing
level (ex.process
improvement:
stock
record modethe qualification
operations,
Qualificationare inlevel
described, but
place
are
status. well managed.
-material
for
and 1being
to
Flexibility
ififthe 3 handling,
or Magic
Chart
followed.
deviations storage,
Square)
revised using
corrected shipping
the results
during etc.).
of
the the
audit LPA arethewell
Check
-Problem
Check the that flexibility Chart
dataverification:
collection definesis for each
fully work
implemented station in term target
of of
-managed.
Error proofing
qualified Solving
people, Methodology
it means the number revised
out using the
ofofcontrol
operators results
situations
needed toof LPA
are
be
records
-identified
Workstation
Check
trained if (basic
to theand
avoid training
Organization
managed.
training
risk forperformed
procedure
of absenteeism newcomers and turnetc....).
describes the re-qualification
over.
--LPA
Check
Check
process ifused the if escalation
to capture
target aprocess
more efficient
for qualification isdefined
included
way toinwork
in the the andtraining.
flexibility lead
Charttheis Ok.
- Ask
standard
In caseseveral
Check
Check for
of a
work record
if deviation, revision
critical action
a re-qualification of escalation
operations plan must be
where
Process training for
followed.
result operators
dependsPerformance
(Employee on subjective
- Check
Look
With
decision.
Review) forLPA ifjob
aCheck
is training
inrotation
Leader the record
place. inisEvaluate
plan
thefocused log.ifalso
orcalibration
ofproduction How on
teamCSE
often
process,
an action does
andand the
in how
frequency,
plan was team
the to
shop control
rotate?
results
generated floor:
andin
The
them
Check
action
LPAE1 number
plan if
and
case of low performance. of
tracked Team
LPAE2: by Members
team,
Check certified
process,
in the per
work
visual station
place….
managementshould support
board the
Job
Test
At
(area Rotation
R&R
shop or by
floor,
plant): Plan.
operatorverify in the visual management board (area or
With the operational manager /training Manager / HR
plant):-
- LPA Plan :-
department
- -Check
LPA Results Tracking
if indicators for all the plant are managed for
- LPA Action turnover
absenteeism, Plan/Effectiveness and lack of skill.
- LPA PARETO
- Are there targets perdefined
shift, team, for these itemsindicators
….. by process.
- In case of deviations, actions plan must be managed.
Item
(ELEMENTO Requirement Requirement Criteria requirement
(REQUISITO) (26 REQUISITOs) BASIC ADDITIVE QSB+ NSA QSB \ PCPA CRITÉRIOs (CRITERIO DO REQUISITO) Look For ANOTAÇOES
CHAVE)
Planos de ação são estabelecidos e implementados abordagem usada para identificar (5M), avaliar e priorizar os
Planos de para cada risco elementar identificado, com riscos \ mapa de riscos para todos os processos de fabricação e
Contingência alavancas robustas de mitigação de risco. equipamentos de infraestrutura essenciais para manter a
CMP2 (Plano de X QSB CMP21 produção( Riscos de incêndio: cobertura de sprinklers,
Continuidade de cobertura de instalações elétricas,Riscos de inundação: paredes,
Negócios) pólders, computador e instalação elétrica elevados em nível
suficiente, Desligamento elétrico: fornecimento alternativo
Os riscos e os planos associados são revisados disponível- Falta de
Identifique quais águaevoluíram
riscos (se for necessária água para a
(veja a síntese)
periodicamente com base na planta, nas lições produção):
Verificar se estoque, garantia
existe processo dede abastecimento,
identificação ...
e tratamento de
corporativas e externas aprendidas e na evolução -novos riscos operacionais. Exemplos: -
X X QSB CMP22 das atividades. - Como as situações de risco são escaladas para a alta
administração \ Uso de sinais fracos em problemas de processo:
aumento de quebras, interrupção (entrega de nível 2 / peça
sobressalente da máquina),
Existem procedimentos de proteção contra intrusão Solicite o procedimento e verifique um exemplo
de Sistemas de Informação e de backup e Avaliar a robustez do plano de mitigação de ataques
recuperação de dados (ex: EDI, SAP ...) e são cibernéticos: restrição de acesso à USB ' uso de mensagens
X X X QSB CMP23 testados regularmente, quando apropriado, os falsas da equipe de TI.
planos são auditados e são realizadas simulações.
Os critérios para se tornar um fornecedor SELEÇÃO\ ESCOLHA do fornecedor for feita no local de
contratável são definidos fabricação, verifique a documentação de um processo de
seleção de fornecedor RANG Ns.
Out Source, Tier n - status d FNR RANG N é conhecido pelo local de fabricação.
CMP3 Management X QSB CMP31
- Fabricação CONSULTADA para a avaliação de desempenho do
fornecedor de NÍVEL N
AUDITORIAS regulares são programadas e realizadas reclamação do cliente causada por um fornecedor RANG N
NOS fornecedores RANG N relatório de resolução de problemas (8D; 5P; Red-X etc.)
Em caso de RECLAMAÇÃO ações são implementadas\ AUDITORIAS fornecedor RANG N, evidência de auditorias em
X X QSB CMP34 Auditorias regulares em fornecedores-chave para fornecedores-chave
melhorar seu sistema (auditorias CQI, auditorias
específicas de processo, PCPA etc.).
Acompanhamento de metas de qualidade e logística Verificar : -
com trajetória planejada - Em caso de atrasos, a implementação de um plano de ação
- O plano de ação é eficiente: a reconvergência é gerida.
X QSB CPE 1
X QSB CPE 2
REUNIÃO Resposta Rápida, de liderança (tipo Reunião de comunicação curta em ambiente adequado (todos
SQCDML) conduzida pela manufatura e apoiada por podem ouvir e ver a reunião),
participantes multifuncionais. Reunião leva em consideração diária / semanal:
X QSB FR11 Segurança (acidente / pré-acidente, Qualidade (questões
externas e internas significativas ...), Custo (taxa de sucata ...),
Atraso (desvio entre a previsão de produção e a quantidade ...)
Gestão (equipe, gerenciamento de mudanças, fase do projeto ...)
Auditoria de camada (programação, desvio principal ...)
Fast Response BOARD está sendo atualizado antes da
reunião para: Verifique a atualização do Conselho
- assegure a duração da reunião. Verifique a qualidade da troca (por exemplo, animador dedicado
X X QSB FR14 - garantir que será uma reunião de comunicação e sua capacidade de gerenciar esse tipo de reunião ...)
(sem discussão profunda sobre o problema) focada Verifique se todos os planos de ação são abordados
no ponto de bloqueio da estrada corretamente
- Assegurar uma escalada no bom nível de gerentes.
Formulário padrão ou banco de dados é usado para Verifique o acompanhamento do banco de dados de lições
X X QSB FR34 documentar lições aprendidas. Um processo é aprendidas e compartilhar o método aprendido
definido para lidar com as lições aprendidas. Verificar como a eficiência lição aprendida é verificado.
Targets are
defined and Verifique o acompanhamento dos resultados do KPI (compare
Medição da eficiência do plano de ação (questões os resultados reais com o alvo definido)
followed to Verifique a eficiência do plano de ação, repetição, datas de
ensure não nominais, escalada, rastreamento da data de
FRE X X QSB FRE1 encerramento do plano de ação) é rastreada com a encerramento, escalonamento fornecido ...
effectiveness of Verifique se o fornecedor analisa as falhas do cliente ligadas a
fast reaction for placa de trilha FR.
problemas internos, acompanhamento de problemas
external and internos ...
internal issues.
O rastreamento de reclamações de clientes por Procure o rastreamento das reclamações caso a caso ((por
X X QSB FRE2 causas é gerenciado. exemplo: uso de análise de pareto, gráfico de torta ...)
O acompanhamento do cumprimento dos prazos de Verifique a AMADEUS com o fornecedor e verifique se não há
X X QSB FRE3 resposta nos sistemas AMADEUS (QAN e QEC) é atraso para as respostas "PACT" e "PAMT"
assegurado
WIM
Organização e Existe um processo para gerenciar com eficácia as PSA 3MIS KPI é exibido na área de resposta rápida
Processo de reclamações de garantia do cliente final de acordo KPI's internos dos fornecedores em relação ao desempenho do
Tratamento X QSB WIM11 com os requisitos do cliente dentro dos limites de gerenciamento de garantia são exibidos na Resposta Rápida ou
(Devolução de tempo e é apoiado pelo rastreamento de KPI de área semelhante
Peças) garantia.
A devolução de peças suspeitas deve ser organizada gerenciamento \ COMO é formalizado (contrato com operadora
X QSB WIM13 com o cliente no mais curto prazo e gerida (Ex: DHL; TNT; correio cronológico…) ou por residente.
(Recepção, armazenamento, registo).
Quando um nível N é afetado por uma reclamação de Como o nível 1 recebe feedback sobre a resolução de problemas
X QSB WIM14 garantia, eles são diretamente envolvidos, mas de garantia - quais ações são planejadas / implementadas.
gerenciados pelo nível 1 responsável. (Provas de reuniões, análises, auditorias etc.) "
Verificar CORRELAÇÃO
- PFMEA \PCP
Proteção ao Reforce o plano de controle após a revisão do - aumento do número de peças tomadas
Cliente X QSB WIM31 PFMEA em resposta ao problema de garantia - aumentar o controle de frequência
- aumentar LPA
- características adicionais
Estação de trabalho,Verificar: -
GERENCIAMENTO VISUAL está em vigor exibindo Se um gerenciamento visual é dedicado (Special Totem - display
KPI's e monitorando o desempenho na estação de
X QSB WIM32 trabalho identificada como causadora /
visual portátil).
Uma rede específica é implantada seguindo o método Ishikawa
potencialmente causadora do problema de garantia "
O fornecedor identificou e contatou as fábricas de fábricas tivessem sido contatadas e informadas de qualquer
X QSB WIM33 OEMs potencialmente afetadas impacto potencial
O estoque de peças de reposição é levado a conta O lote foi segregado "
(Alerta + Lote garantido)
Verificar: -
- Tendência
EFICÀCIA KPIs X QSB WIME1 KPI de pré-análise - Objetivo
- QEC 4 "
X X QSB SW42
X X QSB SW43
X X QSB SW44
Os alvos são
definidos e
seguidos para
RRE garantir a eficácia X X QSB RRE1 Rastreando o número de itens de alto risco ‘- Pergunte se o gráfico Top RPN ou equivalente (com
da atividade de (gráfico de tendência). base na priorização aplicada) é seguido
redução de risco
contínua.
Onde: Loja
A rastreabilidade das peças entregues com
X X QSB MC33 - Verificar como a rastreabilidade das peças em desvio é
desvio é garantida. Os lotes de fabricação são
gerenciada na área de produção
identificados.
- Verificar a gestão de desvios na área de logística
Os indicadores
são definidos e
rastreados para Com: Qualidade e engenharia
garantir que as Número de problemas gerados por uma Verifique se o KPI ou equivalente está definido.
MCE alterações não X X QSB MCE1
mudança. Verifique se a análise PARETO permite identificar o
tenham qualquer número de problemas gerados por uma mudança.
impacto negativo
para o cliente.
Com: Qualidade e engenharia
Acompanhamento de datas de vencimento / Verifique se o KPI ou equivalente está definido.
X X QSB MCE2 mudança de PPAP implementadas por data Verifique se esse rastreamento é coerente com o
de vencimento (acompanhamento de seguinte de derrogação e com o status de inspeção de
marcos). entrada (caso de mudança de matéria-prima).
Verificação cruzada com CMGE2
Com: Logística
X X QSB MCE3 Sem impacto na taxa de serviço. Verificar:-
KPI ou equivalente é definido.
X X QSB MAI42
X X QSB MAI43
X X QSB MAI44
Os indicadores
são definidos e As metas de desempenho e confiabilidade são
rastreados para
MAIE garantir a eficácia X X QSB MAIE1 definidas com base em dados históricos e indicadores
KPI's para o resultado da manutenção
de todas as relacionados são gerenciados (por exemplo, OEE, Taxa
atividades de de falha, MTBF, MTTR, paradas de linha).
manutenção.
X QSB OLG24
Com: Gerente de Logística
.
Onde: Loja
Checar :-
A taxa de serviço de embalagens vazias é imp- indicador de atraso na entrega de embalagens vazias e rastreabilidade da comunicação com OEM (PSA) / fornecedor de serviços de embalagem
Os produtos finais são totalmente identificados Com: Operador Logístico
na sequência de fabricação: rotulagem nas Checar :-
peças (referência, número de sequência), na Rótulos em produtos, embalagens, rótulos atendem ao
X QSB OLG34 Procedimento escrito que econtém
unidade de embalagem as regras
na unidade de da LPA Com:
padrãoProprietário do processo LPA / Líder LPA e a
em particular:
manuseio equipe
Onde: chão de produção
de fábrica
- frequência de auditoria (pelo menos, cada Onde: Na sala de reuniões / chão de fábrica
operação auditada uma vez / mês) 'Verificar:-
LPASK - Folha de verificação da LPA com diretrizes de - Se a Folha de LPA contém os 7 itens necessários
Uma auditoria auditoria, incluídas. Com o proprietário do processo LPA:
genérica de - regras de qualificação para qualificar os artistas descritos
1 / Verifiquenosse ocritérios. Se algum
procedimento dos 7 itens NÃO
LPA define:
processo em LPA. estiver incluído na lista de verificação, a classificação
- Freqüência
LPASK1 camadas (LPA) é X X X QSB LPASK11 - todos os níveis de gerenciamento estão envolvidos deve serexecutará
- quem NOK. o LPA
estabelecida em (do líder da equipe para a alta administração) - Itens
- comode segurança
conduzir o LPA /(método
ergonômicos:
padrão) práticas de
atividades - oFolha
primeiro
inteiras. A de nível deve ser de propriedade
Verificação Auditoria emde - Como gravar
segurança e tratar problemas
adequadas ... sendo seguidos,
e EPIs estão
equipes operacionais
Camadas (ex: equipe
é desenvolvida de fabricação para - Matriz de competências: Apenas pessoas qualificadas
e aplicada.
área de fabricação)
Verifique a folha para verificar a estão trabalhando.
-conformidade
todas as mudanças são auditadas
dos seguintes itens: - Trabalho padronizado: está sendo rigorosamente
- plano de ação incluído atividades de contenção são
X X QSB LPASK12 -definidas
segurança seguido, controles específicos: relacionados às
- matriz de habilidades características-chave do produto e do processo (CSE),
- instrução de trabalho incluindo controle problemas do cliente, processo de baixa capacidade,
específico
O cronograma de LPA é estabelecido. processo
Com: especial do
Proprietário estão em vigor
processo LPAe sendo
/ Líder seguidos.
LPA e a
- padrão
Ele leva emde inicialização
consideração os critérios de - Padrãodedeprodução
equipe inicialização: Inclui verificações à prova de
-amostragem
organização(odoquê, local de trabalho
quem, quando) e erros
Onde:eNa que as de
sala regras de escalonamento
reuniões / chão de fábricasão
diferentes camadas. estritamente
Verifique se oaplicadas
LPA ocorre emdecaso de falha.
acordo com o cronograma
X X QSB LPASK13 A programação da LPA é atualizada O- Organização
quê: operacionaldo local
(porde trabalho:
exemplo: os padrões
produção, são
logística,
regularmente mantidos, ferramentas,
classificação, medidores eGP12,
remessa controlada, materiais
novas linhas
Mais sobre o texto originalÉ necessário adequados estão disponíveis
de produção para novos projetos etc.) e são usados,
fornecer o texto original para ver mais verificações
Quem: de qualidade,
Gerente, FIFO,....
líder de equipe manuseio de materiais,
informações sobre a tradução padrão em
Quando: processo de
a frequência foiestoque
definidaestão em vigor e sendo
e respeitada
seguidos.
Com: Proprietário do processo LPA
- Verificação
Revisões regulares ocorrem com a alta gerência Onde: Na sala de reuniões à prova de erros: as situações fora de
X X QSB LPASK14 controle são identificadas e gerenciadas.
após o kip (Desvio) Verificar:-
Como
SQMEadeve priorização é definida
comparecer comno
ao LPA uma altade
chão administração
fábrica
Com: Líder LPA e a equipe de produção
O LPA que Onde: no chão de fábrica
O processo LPA é realizado em todas as
abrange todas as Verifique se a equipe de produção realmente lidera o
operações (fabricação, cadeia de
atividades LPA e acompanhe o cronograma.
LPASK2 operacionais é X X QSB LPASK21 suprimentos ...)
Verifique os registros do LPA, verifique se as auditorias
realizado e de LPA são executados regularmente pelo TOP
foram realmente realizadas de acordo com o
propriedade da MANAGEMENT (gerente de fábrica, gerente
cronograma e se todas as atividades operacionais
fabricação. de manufatura ...).
foram auditadas (não apenas as operações de
Registros do LPA: Todos os resultados do fabricação, mas o manuseio de materiais,
LPA são documentados, incluindo Com: Líder LPA etransporte
armazenamento, a equipe de produção
etc.).
- nenhum desvio encontrado, Onde: no chão de fábrica
X X QSB LPASK22 - desvio encontrado / não corrigido durante a Verifique se, na planilha LPA, ela é utilizada conforme o
auditoria, modo de registro descrito e se os desvios são
- desvio corrigido durante a auditoria, corrigidos durante a auditoria são bem gerenciados.
- não aplicável.
Com: Proprietário do processo LPA
Onde: Chão de fábrica na folha de contramedidas
A Folha de contramedidas é gerenciada para
'Verifique se as ações de contenção são imediatamente
X X QSB LPASK23 definir planos de ação corretiva e para
consideradas na planilha.
garantir a implementação completa de todas
Verifique
Com: se na planilha
Proprietário LPALPA
do processo utilizamos o modo de
as ações corretivas.
Os resultados do LPA são usados para melhoria registro
Onde: Nadescrito e se os desvios corrigidos durante a
sala de reuniões
auditoria são bem gerenciados.
contínua. A Folha de Contramedidas também é Verifica:-
usada para Melhoria Contínua. (por exemplo, se - Se as descobertas da LPA para implementar a melhoria
uma prática recomendada for descoberta contínua:
X X QSB LPASK24 durante o LPA, ela deve ser usada como um - Gráfico
Com: de flexibilidade
Gerente da equiperevisado com base
de produção nos resultados
no chão de
direcionador para melhorar a instrução de do LPA
fábrica:
trabalho atual. - -Metodologia
Verifique sedeosresolução
níveis de dequalificação
problemas revisada
estão usando
Mais sobre o texto originalÉ necessário fornecer os resultados do LPA
claramente definidos: nível de qualificação /
"Um o texto original para ver mais informações sobre treinamento
- Organização/ certificação
da estação de(portrabalho realizada
exemplo, nível de
acompanhament a tradução
Os - LPA usado para
níveis de qualificação são estabelecidos. qualificação de 1capturar uma maneira
a 3 ou Quadrado mais eficiente de
Mágico)
o do LPA e planos Para cada um deles, são definidos critérios trabalhar e liderar
- Verifique a revisão
se a coleta de do trabalho
dados estápadrão
totalmente
LPASK3 de ação X X X QSB LPASK31
associados estão mensuráveis. implementada em termos de registros (treinamento
em vigor. Os 'apenas pessoas identificadas e qualificadas básico para recém-chegados etc ....).
desvios são estão realizando o trabalho. - Verifique se o processo de escalonamento está
tratados incluído no treinamento.
- Solicitese
Verifique um o registro de treinamento
procedimento de
de treinamento descreve o
Critérios para revisar o nível de qualificação escalonamento para operadores
processo de requalificação
são definidos; eles levam em consideração - Verifique
X X QSB LPASK33 Verifique se se
umoprocesso
treinamento está focado também
de requalificação em
(avaliação
O processo de os resultados operacionais na estação de CSE e como controlá-los
de desempenho do funcionário) está em vigor. Avalie
qualificação do trabalho específica, o resultado da auditoria
se um plano de ação foi gerado em caso de baixo
operador para em camadas, folga do trabalho, etc.
desempenho.
cada cargo e local
de trabalho é
aplicado,
incluindo re-
LPASK4 qualificação, se X X X QSB LPASK41
necessário, para
garantir que
apenas as
pessoas
qualificadas
executem o
trabalho. X X QSB LPASK42
X X QSB LPASK43
X X QSB LPASK44