Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Bac Jinma

    Uploaded by

    nicholo
    The letter requests that the municipal engineer and Bids and Awards Committee chairman reconsider finding the bid submitted by Jinma Enterprises to be non-compliant for ITB No. 2022-07-018-Goods. It argues that the omission of the statement of single largest completed transaction was inadvertent and requests permission to now submit this document. It also requests reconsideration of the finding of non-compliance regarding vehicle tire specifications in the brochure, arguing that the brochure specifications were general and the bid documents specified compliance with the ITB specifications. The letter seeks reconsideration of the findings and permission for Jinma Enterprises to submit compliant documents and deliver services in accordance with its mission and vision.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bac Jinma

    Uploaded by

    nicholo
    29 views2 pages
    The letter requests that the municipal engineer and Bids and Awards Committee chairman reconsider finding the bid submitted by Jinma Enterprises to be non-compliant for ITB No. 2022-07-018-Goods. It argues that the omission of the statement of single largest completed transaction was inadvertent and requests permission to now submit this document. It also requests reconsideration of the finding of non-compliance regarding vehicle tire specifications in the brochure, arguing that the brochure specifications were general and the bid documents specified compliance with the ITB specifications. The letter seeks reconsideration of the findings and permission for Jinma Enterprises to submit compliant documents and deliver services in accordance with its mission and vision.

    Original Description:

    document

    Original Title

    BAC JINMA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The letter requests that the municipal engineer and Bids and Awards Committee chairman reconsider finding the bid submitted by Jinma Enterprises to be non-compliant for ITB No. 2022-07-018-Goods. It argues that the omission of the statement of single largest completed transaction was inadvertent and requests permission to now submit this document. It also requests reconsideration of the finding of non-compliance regarding vehicle tire specifications in the brochure, arguing that the brochure specifications were general and the bid documents specified compliance with the ITB specifications. The letter seeks reconsideration of the findings and permission for Jinma Enterprises to submit compliant documents and deliver services in accordance with its mission and vision.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    29 views2 pages

    Bac Jinma

    Uploaded by

    nicholo
    The letter requests that the municipal engineer and Bids and Awards Committee chairman reconsider finding the bid submitted by Jinma Enterprises to be non-compliant for ITB No. 2022-07-018-Goods. It argues that the omission of the statement of single largest completed transaction was inadvertent and requests permission to now submit this document. It also requests reconsideration of the finding of non-compliance regarding vehicle tire specifications in the brochure, arguing that the brochure specifications were general and the bid documents specified compliance with the ITB specifications. The letter seeks reconsideration of the findings and permission for Jinma Enterprises to submit compliant documents and deliver services in accordance with its mission and vision.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    August 17, 2022

    TO: JACKSON L. PASAMIC


    Municipal Engineer/ AMA
    BAC Chairman

    Sir

    Greetings!

    This has reference to your letter dated August 10, 2022 informing JINMA
    ENTERPRISES of its deficiency relative ITB No. 2022-07-018-Goods wherein
    the resultant bid evaluation by the BAC-TWG on the submitted bid documents
    is “NON-COMPLYING”

    Anent to this, we humbly seek your indulgence to RECONSIDER the said the
    deficiency as INADVERTENT considering that the JINMA ENTERPRISES have
    presented a Company Profile reflective of all transactions including but not
    limited to its STATEMENT OF SINGLE LARGEST COMPLETED
    TRANSACTIONS.

    The Liaison Officer of the Company may have inadvertently, without malice and
    intent to prejudice the government, accidentally excluded said document
    during the preparation of the necessary Bid Documents. While we adhere that
    the compliance to Section 30.1 of the IRR- said non-discretionary “PASS/FAIL”
    criterion postulates a submission of an otherwise incomplete and patently
    insufficient documents. This however, cannot be the case with JINMA
    ENTERPRISES when on its face, upon opening of the BID Documents
    submitted received the non-discretionary criteria and was rated as “PASS” on
    July 27, 2022. In such a case, the BID Documents were not patently
    insufficient or otherwise on its face incomplete.

    Having received the non-discretionary criteria and was rated as PASS, the
    Honorable August body of the Bids and Awards Committee can and is allowed
    by the IRR to require JINMA ENTERPRISES additional and/or documents to
    such as the inadvertently missing STATEMENT OF SINGLE LARGEST
    COMPLETED TRANSACTIONS- same document we now hereunto attach in
    compliance.

    On the observation under the technical specification more particularly with the
    BROCHURE wherein the discrepancy was with the imprinted specification of
    tires in the BROCHURE which is 10+1/10.00 R20 instead of 10+1/12.00 R20
    as per Invitation To Bid, we likewise move to RECONSIDER on the point of
    issue that the BROCHURE was printed in a general specification and were
    printed out in volumes for reference only-subject modification to conform
    to the actual and more specific demands as specified in the Invitation To
    Bid.
    JINMA ENTERPRISES marked the specifications as per ITB as COMPLIANT
    with what was submitted under the Bid Documents not relying on the
    BROCHURE ALONE but on its confidence to deliver as specifically details in
    the ITB. At JINMA ENTERPRISES, we take humble accord and confidence that
    we DELIVER as per minute details from ground up in compliance to the
    requirements laid down in the ITB.

    On account of such premises, we seek not only the indulgence of this


    Honorable August BAC thru its Chairman TO RECONSIDER its finding but
    more over allow the JINMA ENTERPRISES to submit and deliver in consonance
    to its company mission and vision to deliver not only compliant but above
    average quality of service

    Respectfully submitted

    ATTY. NICHOLO RUDOLF AGUSTIN SUPNET


    Chief Counsel
    JINMA ENTERPRISES

    You might also like