CRS On Defense Cuts Thru War Costs 7.25.11
CRS On Defense Cuts Thru War Costs 7.25.11
CRS On Defense Cuts Thru War Costs 7.25.11
This memo was prepared for distribution to more than one congressional office
Reductions in defense spending have been included as an element of measures being considered to rein in federal budget deficits in ongoing debt negotiations. The amount of savings projected in defense may or may not, however, include estimated reductions in spending due to the anticipated withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraq and Afghanistan. Currently, all U.S. troops are scheduled to be withdrawn from Iraq by the end of 2011, though senior officials have said that the United States may be receptive to an Iraqi government request to maintain some residual forces in the country after that time. The United States also plans to halt most operations in Afghanistan by the end of 2014. Whether significant numbers of troops remain in Iraq or Afghanistan or not, it is generally expected that forces will be based elsewhere in the region for some time, though at substantially lower levels than were deployed for the wars. The withdrawal from Iraq has already led to a substantial reduction in the request for overseas funding in next years defense budget compared to current and earlier levels. The Department of Defense (DOD) has requested $117 billion for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) in FY2012, compared to $159 billion enacted in FY2011 and a peak of $187 billion in FY2008. If the declining cost of overseas operations is included in calculations of potential reductions in defense spending over the ten years likely to be covered by a deficit agreement, the result might be to add $1 trillion or more in savings to estimated deficit cuts, though this depends on what baseline the calculations start from and what spending level the plan assumes. Recently it has been reported that Senator Reid may include estimates of such savings in a deficit reduction plan aimed at avoiding another vote to extend the federal debt limit until after the 2012 elections.1 Earlier, House Budget Committee Chairman Ryan included estimates of savings in overseas operations in calculating total spending reductions in the deficit reduction plan reflected in the Housepassed FY2012 budget resolution.2 Table 1 shows the most recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate of baseline overseas funding compared with Administration projections and other alternatives. The CBO baseline reflects CBOs March 2011 estimate of FY2011 overseas funding with increases at the rate of inflation in subsequent years. It is important to note that the Administration projection is not really a policy-based estimate
1 Alan K. Ota and Richard E. Cohen, House, Senate Going Their Own Ways; Reid Says Debt Talks Break Down, CQ Today Online News, July 24, 2011, 5:16 PM, http://www.cq.com/doc/news-3914965. 2 Chairman Ryans savings, reflected in the House-passed FY2012 congressional budget resolution, H.Con.Res.34, include the difference between the Congressional Budget Office March 2011 10-year baseline projection of overseas funding and the Administration estimate. See Table 1 for the estimates. Estimated defense savings from FY2012-FY2021 amount to $1.2 trillion.
7-5700
www.crs.gov
rather it continues a practice of showing $50 billion a year for overseas operations in future budgets as placeholder amounts for overseas operations in long-term Office of Management and Budget funding tables. Over the 11 years from FY2001-FY2011, Congress appropriated $1.2 trillion in DOD war-related budget accounts.3 The CBO baseline budget projection amounts to $1.8 trillion for overseas operations over the 10 years from FY2012-FY2021. CBO estimates that it would cost about $35 billion a year to sustain 45,000 troops in overseas operations over the next few years and about $25 billion a year for 30,000 troops, far below earlier war-related appropriations.4 Those figures appear relatively high compared to costs of deploying comparable numbers of forces abroad when not involved in large scale combat operations. Direct costs of the 34,000 troops deployed in Japan, for example, are projected to total $5.5 billion in FY2012.5 Costs of operations Northern Watch and Southern Watch, which maintained no fly zones over Iraq before the war in 2003, peaked at $1.5 billion in FY1998.6
See Amy Belasco, The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11, CRS Report RL33110, updated March 29, 2011. 4 These estimates are from CBO projections of the effect of alternative policies on the budget in annual reports on the budget and economic outlook, issued in January each year, and in updates issued in August. The cost of 45,000 troops is from CBO, The Budget and Economic Outlook, Fiscal Years 2011 to 2021,January 2011, Table 1-7, fn p. 23. The cost of 30,000 troops is from CBO, The Budget and Economic Outlook: An Update, August 2010, Table 1-7, fn p. 25. 5 For troop levels in Japan and elsewhere, see Department of Defense, Statistical Information Analysis Division, Active Duty Military Personnel by Service by Region/Country, March 31, 2011, on line at http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/ MILITARY/history/hst1103.pdf. Cost data from Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance Overview, Fiscal Year 2012, February 2011, p. 210, on line at http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudget/fy2012/fy2012_OM_Overview.pdf. 6 CRS figures from DOD Comptroller and from annual Department of Defense Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund budget justification books provided with annual budget requests.
CRS-3