Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Project Synchrony

    Uploaded by

    prakash
    - The updates were for Project Synchrony which aims to improve production line efficiency through buffer systems. - Two vendors were considered: Orpac had a 7-8 month lead time and higher costs, while Durva Machinery offered a 3 month lead time and costs around half of Orpac's quote. - The engineering team recommended moving ahead with Durva due to the shorter lead time and lower costs. - The scope of work involves relocating and integrating various production machines and installing two buffer systems in phases to capture learnings between the phases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Project Synchrony

    Uploaded by

    prakash
    33 views3 pages
    - The updates were for Project Synchrony which aims to improve production line efficiency through buffer systems. - Two vendors were considered: Orpac had a 7-8 month lead time and higher costs, while Durva Machinery offered a 3 month lead time and costs around half of Orpac's quote. - The engineering team recommended moving ahead with Durva due to the shorter lead time and lower costs. - The scope of work involves relocating and integrating various production machines and installing two buffer systems in phases to capture learnings between the phases.

    Original Title

    Project synchrony

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    - The updates were for Project Synchrony which aims to improve production line efficiency through buffer systems. - Two vendors were considered: Orpac had a 7-8 month lead time and higher costs, while Durva Machinery offered a 3 month lead time and costs around half of Orpac's quote. - The engineering team recommended moving ahead with Durva due to the shorter lead time and lower costs. - The scope of work involves relocating and integrating various production machines and installing two buffer systems in phases to capture learnings between the phases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    33 views3 pages

    Project Synchrony

    Uploaded by

    prakash
    - The updates were for Project Synchrony which aims to improve production line efficiency through buffer systems. - Two vendors were considered: Orpac had a 7-8 month lead time and higher costs, while Durva Machinery offered a 3 month lead time and costs around half of Orpac's quote. - The engineering team recommended moving ahead with Durva due to the shorter lead time and lower costs. - The scope of work involves relocating and integrating various production machines and installing two buffer systems in phases to capture learnings between the phases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Hi Team,

    Please find the updates for Project Synchrony: -

    Key Activities Completed

    - Discussion with Orpac –


    Orpac aligned to use lesser lead time components to reduce the lead time and cost, however
    still the lead time is somewhere around 7-8 months and the cost of the solution is still higher
    than the initial base budgetary quotation given by Orpac. The project is supposed to be
    executed in the phase-wise manner, the second solution to be manufactured after the start-up
    of the first to utilize the learnings.

    - Visit to Durva Machinery (Ahmedabad) –


    -  Discussion on the technical feasibility of Durva’s original solution (Solution 1)
    -  Discussion on the technical feasibility of Morrison’s solution (Solution 2) to be executed by
    Durva
    -  Durva is comfortable in developing both kind of the solution as per their capability. Basic
    scope has been discussed and frozen.
    -  Manufacturing Lead time in case of Durva Machinery is 3 months and costs are almost half of
    what Orpac has quoted.
    -  Due diligence done for the vendor’s site and we have confidence that the vendor will be able
    to handle this order despite of being small scale. We are betting on their current portfolio
    (domestic & international) and the owner’s experience in ampoule handling facility for past 15
    years.

    Note – Due to the lead time and cost difference the recommendation from the site engineering
    team is to move ahead with Durva Machinery for the implementation of project. Proper due
    diligence has been done by visiting the site which has increased the confidence level for the
    success of this developmental project.

            -     Site Feasibility –


                  -  After discussion on site within the engineering team, solution 2 is preferred as in sol. 1 there
    might be a problem of the back-pressure.
                  -  Markings has been done on the site to understand the spatial constraints.
                  -  Civil scope has been defined.
                        

    Scope (in the order of planned execution)

    - Swapping of reject and accept chutes of Brevetti Machines.


    - Relocation of partition between Brevetti 1 and Esai room to create more space for pallet
    mobilization at Brevetti 1 feeding area. This will require door relocation in the Esai room
    beforehand.
    - Relocation of Brevetti machine panel as per the spatial constraints.
    - Removal of partition between Brevetti 1 and Sticker Labelling 2 for integration.
    - Relocation of Sticker Labelling 2 for integration.
    - Relocation of partition between Sticker Labelling 2 and Sticker Labelling 1 to optimize space for
    the future prospects (new engineering office) after SL1 is moved to current engineering office
    for integration with Brevetti 2. This will require door closing in the current Sticker Labelling 2.
    - Installation of the new buffer system and startup for the first module. Capture learnings.
    - Relocation of Brevetti 2 panels as per the spatial constraints.
    - Removal of partition between Brevetti 2 and current engineering office
    - Relocation of Sticker Labelling 1 (and MRA panel) to current engineering office
    - Installation of the second buffer system and startup of the same.
    - Door closing of current engineering office
    - Note – Partition relocation between current engineering office (future SL1 room) for space
    optimization has not been considered as of now as it may interfere with the scope of Synchrony
    Phase 2 (connection of SL1 and Old Elmach machines)

    Existing Layout (for reference)


     

    New Layout

    You might also like