Reflection Paper

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

NORSHYKA BINTI SHAHARUDDEEN

2022404146
AA7001CF

REFLECTION PAPER ON COST-VOLUME-PROFIT ANALYSIS

Cost-volume-profit (CVP) is a way for companies to determine how the changes


in both variable and fixed cost and sales volume can affect a company’s profit or net
income. By have a better understanding on this topic, the companies can have a better
overall performance on how to maximize the company’s profit. It also can help the
companies to analyze where they are in terms of cost, how many quantities will they
have and their profit.
As I mentioned break-even on my first paragraph, break-even is the number of
units that the company must produce and sell in order to make the profit equals to
zero. In a simple word, the number of units produce is where the total revenue is the
same to the total of expenses. If the profit is equals to zero, the break-even point has
been reached. This will help the company to not get losses.
In addition, CVP can be a good start for making a new decision making. It might
be challenging at first because of many uncertain elements, multiple products and
demand, if the companies willing to use this analysis, then the companies need to
figure out the internal and external environment, and the relationship between all the
variables by themselves.
CVP also helps in composing the different price policies by showcasing the
reaction and impact of fluctuating price frames on the cost and profits. The pricing
factor also plays a vital role in fixing up the volumes in the dejection period as well.
This particular security and analysis help in apprehending the amount of operating
expense to be taxed on to the goods at numerous stages of operation. The already
analyzed overhead cost is associated with the chosen and adopted volume of the
production.
In conclusion, CVP can helps the operators and managers to discover and
locate the break-even point. This method sets up the budgeting activities related to
business. It is a systematic approach to analyzing any manufacturing business to
provide a clear picture of the business and assist in making decisions.
REFLECTION PAPER ON ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING

Activity-Based costing (ABC) is a costing method that assigns overhead and


indirect costs to related products and services. This method recognizes the
relationship between costs, overhead activities and manufactured products, assigning
indirect costs to products less arbitrarily than traditional costing methods. Plus, this
method mostly used in the manufacturing industry since it enhanced the reliability of
cost data, hence the producing nearly true costs and better classifying the costs
incurred by the company during its production process.
Since ABC method using a cost driver such as purchase orders or machine
setups, it will help the companies to have a better grasp on costs so that the companies
will have a more appropriate pricing strategy.
All methods have pros and cons. The benefits for ABC method are this method
brings accuracy and reliability in product cost determination just by focusing on cause
and effect relationship in cost incurrence. It recognizes that the activities which cause
costs, not products and it is product which consume activities. As a results, ABC
provides more realistic product costs in manufacturing environment and technology
where the support functions overheads constitute a large share of total costs. Unlike
the traditional method is likely to bring errors and approximation in product cost
determination because the method is using arbitrary apportionment and absorption
methods.
In addition, ABC methods can help the manager to be able to control many
fixed overhead costs by exercising more control over the activities which have caused
these fixed overhead costs. This is more visible and clearer since the behavior of many
fixed overhead costs in relation to activities. Plus, this method uses multiple cost
drivers which are transaction based rather than product volume.
ABC method is not only focusing on manufacturing but service organizations
like banks, government departments and hospitals can improve decision making and
cost management since these field have almost no direct costs. So, the traditional
method considered inappropriate to use because for this service organization are
using most of the costs are overheads and they do not hold stocks of service.
For the cons, ABC has numerous cost pools and multiple cost drivers and
therefore it can be more complex than traditional product costing systems. It can prove
costly to manage ABC system.

You might also like