Machiavelli Ibnu Khaldun
Machiavelli Ibnu Khaldun
Machiavelli Ibnu Khaldun
his famous book “ The Prince”. He describe on how to be a capable prince or leader to
ruled the states. He included few basis regarding the leadership. Unlike Machiavelli,
Ibnu Khaldun from muslim scholars emphasize few basis about a leadership,
even thought, Ibnu Khaldun is a historian, but he also included the basis of leadership in
The first thought on leadership is the characteristic in stable the state. Different
scholars have different view regarding the characteristic or quality that need to be a
hereditary.After several years experience serving the few kingdoms, he believes that
hereditary leaders is a qualified leaders to rules the state. This stated in the prince
the states with the hereditary because the sovereignty from the ancestors. Therefore,
the stable princedom is the prince that have hereditary. Unlike Machiavelli, Ibnu
Khaldun describe the quality leaders is based on the on the noble values such as
generousity, tolerance and etc. After a leader uphold this values , they will win a
groupthat shared a same feelings and values , so the leaders will have a joyful in the
______________________________________________________________________
for Machiavelli the priority is the hereditary , which is the stable state is the
the rulers or leader that came from the civil society and avoid himself from
the position rather than the leaders that receive a leadership through the
hereditary. The issue is , the leader who in the throne have difficulties to maintain
his position , even thought he receive a majority or popular vote from the
subject, but there are tendency for the leader to be overthrow from the position.
This is because not all among his subject like him very much and this group of
people can raise and remove him from the office. The leader in this situation , he
must fulfill minority group prosperity and also majority . Therefore, the leaders
doesn’t have absolute power to rules. In this sense , hereditary leaders has
absolute power to rules . This is due to the rulers or leaders has educated the
subject to obey and accept the sovereignty of the leaders but never neglect the
from hereditary leaders. For Ibnu Khaldun he sees that group feeling plays
the role determine the absolute power of the leaders, nor of hereditary or
majority votes. For him, the group of feelings or royal family influence the
leaders that will be choose to rules the state. This is because they have much
power in the region, they also have strengthen the dynasty with a values, so
the leaders will rules according to the people will. The leaders is strength
in the state is not because of the hereditary or people vote, but the group
feelings that shared the same values with the leaders and the people.
Therefore , the people is submitting to obey the rulers which they shared the
The two points under the thought of two scholars in term of leadership is the
view on how the leaders should be a leaders and maintain their position. The
characters that raised by Ibnu Khaldun and Machiavelli is same but differ from
the concept of hereditary and group of feelings. The other point is about
stress on hereditary and less support the people options. While, Ibnu Khaldun
believe the group of feelings that shared the same values with the people will
important than the religion and moral behavior . Machiavelli said that as cited
from Robert Rees, 1999, this is due of political changes in the Italy that called
Italian Renaissance . The book itself as titles “ The Prince” shows the
government and become political advisors for Borgia family. From his
view on the leadership is beyond the religion itself. Therefore, Machiavelli put
since the beginning of the civilization. In His book Al-muqaddimah, the first
civilization.
______________________________________________________________
1) Al-Muqaddimah, First prefatory discussion , Chapter 1, Ibnu Khaldun
2) The Prince, Nicolas Machiavelli.
Examples of Leadership Scenario during Ibnu Khaldun and Machiavelli
Machiavelli in his book the prince give few examples that he experience it
and include it in his writings, for example, in chapter three, concerning the
through the previous rulers to better the conditions. The rulers must have a
For example, He issued the issue of French rulers which is King Louis the
is not been accepted by the people, even thought they tried to get twice. The
story of King Louis it shows how the leaders must be accepted by the people ,
Unlike Machiavelli, Ibnu Khaldun have a different scenario with the leadership. Ibnu
Khaldun clarified the issue of leadership when he was in Tunisia during Sultan Abu
Ishaq, in Morocco, he founds the weakess and the strength of the leadership. After that
he travelled few countries and also served to the few Amirs and Sultans. During his
travelled and learning about civilization and politics. He finally compiled his knowledge
Khaldun said few abaout leadership , for example in Chapter one and two in Al-
Constantine which is Sultan Abdul Abbas. Therefore, the situation with the rulers
______________________________________________________________________
1) The Prince, Machiavelli, Chapter 3: the mixture princedom….2) Ibnu Khaldun, muslim heritage
2)