A New Era in Power Tunnel Construction in NHPC
A New Era in Power Tunnel Construction in NHPC
A New Era in Power Tunnel Construction in NHPC
All tunnel boring machines require breaking oI excavated material into sizes,
which can be handled easily Ior removal. In most oI the machines Iull circular cutting
head is deployed. The cutters are mounted in a suitable manner to excavate a tunnel
oI required diameter when the head is rotted under thrust against the working Iace.
The machine body is immediately behind the cutting head that remains stationary
while the cutting head excavates. To maintain its stationary position during
excavation a mechanism is involved which allows the machines to move itselI and the
cutting head Iorward to continue the excavation. Main machine body also contains
mechanical equipment, which provides the necessary thrust, and the torque is
transmitted through the cutting head to the cutters. The muck is removed Irom the
excavated Iace by a number oI buckets on the cutting head and is dropped into a
conveyor belt system, where it discharges into hopper Ior loading in the muck cars or
any other type oI transportation system Ior removal Irom the tunnel.
All tunneling machines contain these components in some Iorm or another,
however, their general arrangement depends primarily on whether the machine in
intended Ior use in soIt ground or in rock. Detailed design varies with manuIacturers.
The main design diIIerence arising Irom the type oI ground to be encountered is that
soIt ground requires some kind oI support as soon as the excavation is made, a
limitation which may not be imposed in hard rock tunneling. In soIt ground
machines, the main Iunction oI the Iorward thrust generally is to support the vertical
Iace oI the excavated ground against collapse, whereas, in hard rock tunneling
Table 1: Classification of Formation on the Basic of their characteristics for
tunneling
ClassiIication Typical Formation
SoIt ground Uncemented deposits oI clay, silt, sand and gravel, possibly
saturated; marl
SoIt rock Shale, tuII, claystone, sandstone
Medium hard rock Some basalt, granite and andesite; average sandstone and
limestone; dolomite, chalk, rhyolite, gneiss, schist
Hard rock Some basalt, granite and andesite; well-cemented sand-stone
and limestone; marble, chert, diorite, quartzite, argillite
machines, the thrust is to supply the energy to break the material. Broadly the types
oI TBMs (Fig.1) can be described in the Iollowing manner:
a. Open mode TBM (unshielded TBM)
b. Single shield TBM
c. Telescopic shield (double shield)
d. Reaming type
Fig 1: Types Of TBMs
Open Mode TBM (Unshielded TBM)
This type oI TBM is suited Ior working in stable and hard rock strata. Supports
required are based on classiIication oI rock types, which may vary Irom spot bolting,
systematic rock bolting, shotcreting 50 mm to 150 mm, welded wire mesh and in poor
geological conditions, steel sets can also be installed. Peak output in the range oI 20m
per day can be achieved but average progress may be much lower by 40 to 50 . In
very hard rock`s the boring process can be accelerated by various methods by
increasing the speed oI cutterhead rotation and increasing the cutterhead thrust. The
gripper shoes in open made TBM distributes the thrust and Iorces the machines to
move Iorward, thereIore the dimensions oI the gripper shoes have to be suIIicient Ior
distribution oI large amount oI thrust so that breaking oI soIter ground and opening oI
ioints because oI concentrated Iorces is avoided. In poor geological conditions or
weaker strata are expected along the tunnel alignment then gripper shoes shall allow
the use oI steel ribs at close spacing.
Single shield TBM
Single shield TBM is used where geological conditions demand immediate
supporting oI the rock behind cutter head. Temporary support is provided by steel
shield and protection by precast segmental lining. Reaction oI thrust Iorce is
transIerred to the segmental lining. The advance rates are comparatively slower than
the open mode TBM. In area oI high rock pressures and convergency in the weak
zones, the skin plate oI the shield may get locked or iammed.
Telescopic Shield (Double Shield) TBM
The telescopic shield is an intermediate partially Iloating shield, which covers
the gap between the two main shields when the main thrust cylinder, are extended.
The telescopic shield has double articulation between the Iront shield and the outer
telescopic shield respectively between the inner telescopic shield and the gripper
shield, to allow easier machine steering without undue stresses on the telescopic
shield system.
In this type oI TBM, shield length is divided in two parts. Excavation is
carried out under protection oI Iront shield where as in the rear section precast
concrete segmental linning is protected. Here also, the thrust is transIerred to the
linning by means oI iacks. Working in high pressure and squeezing ground there may
be iamming problems as in case oI single shield.
Reaming Type TBM
These type oI TBMs are required in large diameter tunnels and in weak geological
conditions where pre-boring is a requirement.
Fundamentally, diIIerence between rock tunnel boring machine and soIt
rock/soil boring machine is only the arrangement and type oI cutting tools Iixed on to
the cutter head. In case oI soIt soil tunneling, scrapping picks are Iixed on to the
cutter head with larger openings in the cutter head so that the excavated material
easily Ilows into the pressurized chamber. On the other hand, the rock tunnel boring
machine has rotating discs on the cutter head. Disc cutters have to be oI very hard
material so that these can easily cut into the rock. Replacement oI cutters due to wear
is not required Irequently.
FACTORS INFLUENCING SELECTION OF TBM
The characteristics oI tunneling machines are determined by the kind oI Iormation in
which they are designed to operate namely, soIt ground, soIt rock, medium hard rock
or hard rock. There is not universally recognized system oI making the classiIication.
Table 1 shows some diIIerent types oI rock that commonly Iall into the diIIerent
grouping. The classiIication is Ior general guidance only, since the compressive
strength and the diIIiculty oI tunneling in a particular rock type can vary considerably,
depending on the crystalline structure, particle shape, amount oI cementation, degree
oI weathering, ioint pattern, degree oI weathering, ioint pattern, Ioliation, seepage
water and number oI ioints.
Fig 2: X-Section of TBM showing Basic Components
Some oI the maior reasons why TBM excavation is commonly selected are
economic considerations, imposed time limitation, design advantages, cost advantages
and imposed environmental limitations. Other Iactors, which can inIluence the
selection, are geometry oI the tunnel in the Iorm oI diameter oI the tunnel and
limitations oI the curve radius.
The diameter oI the tunnel is oI great importance in comparing the costs oI the
two excavation methods. During the post Iew years cost comparisons have been
made on the drilling and blasting method (DBM) vs. boring with TBM. There are
limitations in the use oI TBM. There are limitations is regarding installation oI rock
bolts and steel ribs. When the diameter oI
the tunnel is less than 4 m, it is diIIicult to
install rock bolts or steel support behind the
heading or even behind the machine. When
the diameter oI tunnel is equal to or less
than 3 m, supply oI Iresh air and material as
well as transportation oI muck becomes a problem. This means that in very small
diameter tunnels, the length oI boring Iace must be limited to nearly 2500 m to 3500
m. The supply problem is much the same Ior TBM and DBM tunnels.
Another important geometrical Iactor is the length oI the tunnel. Tunnel
boring operation requires much more extensive investment in equipment than tunnel
blasting. ThereIore, it is essential that the cost oI the equipment be depreciated over a
good length oI tunnel. Which means that the tunnel boring machine is required to be
reused in other proiects oI similar diameter. The minimum length may vary depending
on the proiect; but there may be proiects in which TBM could be iustiIied even iI the
tunnel length is shorter than 5 km. ThereIore, it is common practice to depreciate
boring oI more than 15 km. In case oI larger tunnels, the boring machine always must
be depreciated on the speciIic task Ior which it was designed.
Mechanical excavation is generally more economical than conventional
tunneling, particularly on longer tunnels. On the basis oI simple Ieasibility-level
exploration, it is possible to evaluate TBM Ieasibility and prepare comparative
estimates oI conventional and TBM excavation. Decisions made by the planners and
designers in the early stage oI conception have the greatest impact on proiect cost.
ThereIore, it is essential that planners and designers avail themselves oI current state-
oI-the art knowledge and experience regarding exploration, design, contracting,
bidding and excavation using TBMs. It is important that exploration be appropriate to
anticipated conditions and anticipated type oI construction equipment and methods,
geotechnical testing be appropriate to expected condition and expected type oI
Fig 3: Disc Cutters for Hard Rock
Formations
construction equipment and methods and construction expertise Ior anticipated
conditions be utilized during proiect conception.
DBM Vs TBM BORING
The choice between drill & blast method and tunnel boring method is decided
by a number oI Iactors. Four maior categories oI Iactors in making the DBM Vs
TBM decision are:
a. Geometry oI the tunnel
b. Site conditions
c. Economic conditions oI the contract
d. Geology and type oI rock
Site conditions are oIten the decisive Iactor in choosing between use oI DBM or
TBM. In the case oI longer tunnels, in order to meet the time schedule, it becomes
diIIicult to excavate with DBM. On the other hand, it is possible to meet the time
schedule with the use oI TBM. The area where the intermediate adits cannot be
constructed or due to time constraint, the use oI intermediate adits is not preIerable,
TBMs can be used successIully. Remotely located adits mean high construction
costs, especially when the area is in high mountain region or the terrain is rough. In
such cases, tunnel boring may win over tunnel blasting due to the higher output in
meters per month even though the tunnel cost per meter is higher with the use oI
TBM.
The tunnel boring method is advantageous Ior concrete lined tunnels because
oI less over break but the extent oI the advantage varies depending on how properly
the tunnel is excavated by blasting.
The quality oI the assessment oI the geological conditions along the proposed
tunnel route is most important Ior the selection oI tunneling method. The boring
equipment is generally designed Ior one type oI ground condition in which it can
perIorm optimally. The blasting method is less sensitive with regard to deviations
Irom assumed ground conditions. Consequently, the risks involved in boring are
higher, and the only possibility oI reducing the costs is to produce good geological
and geotechnical assessments. It is impossible to quantiIy the amount oI work
involved in such a iob because it depends on the speciIic site conditions.
It is well-known Iact that the boring technique is more competitive in low
strength and low-abrasive rock, irrespective oI the terms in which the strength and
abrasiveness are measured. Other rock Iactors, which are required to be dealt, are;
regional homogeneity oI the rock, water conditions, temperature oI the rock and
support requirements.
One oI the maior disadvantages oI the boring technique in comparison with
excavation by blasting is the lack oI Ilexibility in boring. The boring machine is
generally designated to achieve optimum perIormance in only one kind oI material.
In Himalayan geology, homogeneous conditions do not occur along the entire length
oI tunnel, it is much more Irequent to encounter variations in rock conditions. When
the rock class encountered is class IV and V, excavation with TBM at the Iace
becomes most diIIicult task in open mode TBM. Controlling cavity and loose Iall or
rooI Iall becomes a blind operation, which may lead to Iailure oI the system.
ThereIore, Ior the selection oI TBM, very detailed site investigation is required iI
excavation oI the tunnel by TBM is required to be carried out.
It has been stated that tunnel blasting is much more Ilexible than boring. This
statement is also valid concerning the curve radius oI the tunnels. It is generally not
the boring machine as such, but rather the long conveyor on the back-up Iramework
that requires Iairly large curve radius.
TBM excavation will generally require less support than conventional
excavation Ior the same ground conditions. The eIIect oI support on costs in a TBM
tunnel will be the result oI decreased excavation rates and the cost oI materials and
installation. The method oI support must be structurally adequate and compatible
with the high penetration and advance rates common with TBM excavation.
Compatibility oI the support and excavation system can have a proIound eIIect on
excavation rates.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Functionally, TBM can be basically classiIied into two types:
a. Hard rock TBM and
b. SoIt ground TBM.
An attempt has been made to describe these two machines in brieI.
Hard Rock TBM
1he Excavation Svstem: The excavation is perIormed by a cutting head,
usually convex in the direction oI advance with the cutting tools arranged on it Ior
optimum cutting eIIect. The cutting head must be structurally capable oI
withstanding the thrust and torque that it transmits to the cutters. In rock where it
does not have to support the material at the working Iace, the cutting head
incorporates a means oI removing the excavated rock Irom the Iace. In this instance,
a series oI buckets around the edge oI the cutting head is used to raise the material and
drop it on the conveyor system.
Cutters: DiIIerent types oI cutters are used in rock tunneling machines, depending on
the rock hardness. To break the rock, cutters are thrust against the surIace and the
rolled across it under pressure. The cutters are mounted on roller bearings that are
critical in determining the liIe oI the cutter. Present rock tunneling machines usually
incorporate a system oI automatic bearing lubrication to prolog the cutter liIe. The
diIIerent types oI cutters are described hereunder:
a. Disc cutters: These have been used in many oI the most successIul tunneling
machines operating in soIt and medium hard rock. A single cutter consists oI
a disc-shaped base mounted on a roller bearing with a replaceable cutting edge
oI hardened steel around the disc. They may consist oI single, double or triple
cutting discs mounted together (Fig. 3).
The disc cutter operates on what is reIerred to as the KerI` principle,
by which the cutter attacks the rock by cutting a groove into it while exerting a
shearing Iorce that causes the remaining ridges or rocks to break away. Disc
cutters are the best means oI cutting rock with compressive strength upto
175MPa. The disc cutters can break much harder rocks by the use oI tungsten-
carbide inserts around the edge oI disc.
b. Roller cutters: This type oI cutter rolls over the rock and Iactures it by
applying a direct mechanical Iorce to all parts oI the rock surIace under attack.
Roller cutters are oI two types: milled-tooth cutters and tungsten-carbide-
insert cutters. This type is produced Irom heat-treated oI a truncated, cone-
shaped base. The teeth may be selI-sharpening by single hard Iacing on the
tooth Ilank, or both Iaces oI the teeth may be hardened to give maximum
abrasion-resistance. When the abrasiveness oI the rock puts it beyond the
capabilities oI the milled-tooth cutter, tungsten-carbide-insert cutters are used.
The cutter has a truncated cone shape, with the cutting surIace studded with
small tungsten-carbide inserts. The shape oI the individual inserts varies.
They may be chisel-crested, with a shape similar to a tooth; they may have a
conical nose with a rounded apex where the angle oI the cone may be 60 to
120 degrees; or they may be hemispherical. The choice oI the shape depends
on the hardness oI the rock t be Iractured.
The tungsten-carbide roller cutter breaks the rock more by a process oI
pulverizing it than by chipping out pieces. This type oI cutter has been used to
excavate the highest-strength rock that has been economically worked to date,
but it has the disadvantages oI high cost, slow penetration rate and the
production oI a high percentage oI Iines.
avout of Cutters on the cutting head: In tunneling machine Ior use in soIt ground,
one type oI drag cutter is generally used over the entire Iace oI the cutting head.
However, rock tunnel boring machine may employ diIIerent types oI cutters to
advantage on diIIerent parts oI the cutting head. In the choice and arrangement oI
cutters over the Iace, there are three distinct zones with diIIerent requirements namely
the centre the Iace and the outside edge.
a. Center cutter: One or more roller cutters
usually accomplish breaking the center oI the bore in harder
rock, since the Iracturing action oI the disc cutters cannot
take place eIIectively until the bore is started. The cutters
may be arranged as a tricone bit, or a single cutter may be
cantilever mounted (Fig.4).
b. Face Cutter: These are the cutters that attack
the main area oI the Iace. They are generally disc cutters or
roller cutters, depending on the hardness oI the rock, but drag
cutters are sometimes used in soIt rock (Fig. 5)
c. Gauge cutters: Gauge cutters are mounted at
the extreme outside edge oI the cutterhead and their Iunction
is to maintain the bore diameter at the require size. They are
Fig 4: Center Cutter
Fig 5: Face Cutter
usually disc cutters or roller cutters. To provide clearance Ior the outer
end oI the cutter bearing, it is necessary to slope the Iace oI the cutter
so that it is not longer parallel to the working Iace. Because this
positioning would lead to uneven and Iaster wear than the Iace cutters,
the gauge cutters are usually treated with special hard Iacing or
tungsten-carbide inserts.