Uts Metpen

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

UTS-Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Karvalmiah

INTRODUCTION
Duck faming in Indonesia have a grcat contribution to the small holderS.
preliminan studies found that local ducks of strain A
and B
Our
practices in Lombok The farmers fed them with local dominated on the
farming
formulation progressing in the
feedstuff feeding with farmer's diet
recent years his
development is closely related to the
increasing demand on their products botn eggs and meat. Local ducks such as strain A isone
of the local
poultry breed that have the advantage of producing This duck has long been
preserved and grown in South Kal1mantan, especially in the eggs. Hulu Sungai Selatan
Hulu Sungai Tengah (HST), and Hulu
Sungai Utara (HSU). A's duck population in(HSS) South
Kalimantan in 2010 was 4,354,121 with 4.17%
growth
27.733,704 kg and 1,525,615 kg respectively (Provincial rate, egg and meat production of
Kalimantan, 2011). The largest A duck population is located in Livestock Service of South
North Hulu Sungai Regency
1,280.591 birds (BPS KabupatenHulu Sungai Utara
935,927 birds (BPS KabupatenHulu Sungai Selatan 2010), KabupatenHulu Sungai Selatan
of 947,115 (BPS 2010), and Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency
KabupatenHulu Sungai Central 2010) and the rest are scattered in several
districts and cities in South Kalimantan
(http://web.bptukdi.info 2017.04 itik-A-untuk
kesejahteraan-peternak html
Whilst strain B is another local duck breed, is well known
the poultry breed in Indonesia,
superior layer of duck originating from East Java. However, there was no information on
the current population of
Mojosari ducks. In general, thenational population of ducks
increased in 2017 about 6.24 per cent from the
previous year (from 46711900 to 49709403
birds). In fact, in further development, the population of this ducks is reported decreasing
(http: www.trobos.com detail-berita 2016 08 01 29 7791 mempertahankan-eksistensi-itik-
mojosar). There are some challenges to be taken into consideration in developing layer local
ducks The hatchability values of both local ducks were 48 98 percent (A) (unpublished) and
52.9 to 66.0 percent (B) depending on the sex ratios as
reported by Indarsih et al. (2018)
which is lower compared to the expected hatching
perfomance. Whilst hatching
performance of kampong chickens was 66,67 percent (.Susanto and Suliswanto, 2013 ), thus
genetically local ducks had lower performance than local chickens. In addition, fishy tastes of
the duck egg together with cholesterol issues undeniably affected the consumer
preferences.
Regardless of these problems, the two genotypes are very popular in the duck famer society
in Lombok. The objective of this work, therefore, was to
provide local duck performance
both quantitative and qualitative traits as reterences for small holders to made a choice in
keeping their selected local ducks.
MATERIALS AND METIODSs
Birds and management
The study was conduted on
aau
ombok Island, Indonesia durng
e t ErOup silanted in the suburb of
l Mataram, in
AD)and one hundred 44-week-oos c k s022 werehundred 44-week-old A ducks
One

n tuw seNtatcd *ns ( birds m ) ne (MD) housed in the same buildin


NnOds 2O whs of age) and were
birus were obtaned from local
brecders at growing
10 wecks echuding wecks l0r mananeu
2 m toor pens on deep litter
system for period a

ME) SO0 Keal kg and 17.5°o acenaon A diet containing metabolisable


erude protein (P) was offered. All birds were fed energy
with comentional feedstutts according to the lamer's manually
Tounded fresh water fish and green algae formula consisting of rice bran,
et al (2015) with calculated nutrient (uidentified chlorophyta) as
reported by Indarsih
composition as shown in Table 1. Outdoor
drnking water was provided for 24 hours. In tloor access to
entered into the laying periods. bach pen was 6 m pens, each breed was raised until they
length and 3 m width. Three nest boxes
were provided for each pen on the floor. We did not
treat the ducks
both medication and vaceination toany health prevention
Table 1. Ingredient and calculated nutrient composition (g/kg)
of experimental diet.
Rice bran
Ingredient (g/kg)
500
Ground fresh water fish
300
Green algae (unident1fied
chlorophyta) 200
Total
1,000
Calculated nutrient contents
Metabolizable Energy (keal/kg)
,800
Crude Protein ()
17.5
Crude Fiber (o)
7.0
Calcium (°%)
0.54
Phosphor (available) (°o) 0.67

Laying performance measurements


Egg production was recorded daily and was calculated on a
total number of eggs collected divided hen-day basis as follows:
by total number of live laying ducks per day in each
group. Feed intake was measured on weekly basis. Feed conversion
the ratio of grams of feed to ratio was calculated as
grams of egg mass as used by many authors
Singh et al., 2021). Egg mass (EM) was calculated as EM (Diken et al., 2016;
(EP*EW/100. The FCR was
=

calculated as FCR FI/EM (Diken et al., 2016).


=

Body weight of both local ducks was weighed at the


periods beginning and end of the experimental
RESULTs
Table 2.
Parameters* * * (Means SE) at 24 wecks of
Egg production (%) A
M
production agc
Egg weight (g) n-100 p-value
Egg mass (g/day) 69 03+8.09 n-100
64.70+1.33 58.0416.2 0.005
Body weight (g/bird) 44.66+5.6 66.70:2.18" 0.004
1386167 38.69+4.4 0.03
1638+62 0.03

Pertanyaan
1.
Apa kira judul dari paper
2. tersebut ?
Buat/susun sebuah
3.
Jelaskan table diatas abstract dengan
ngan jumah kata maksimal
ma 200!
4. Tarik kesimpulan dan tulis judul
tabelnya

You might also like