Dunn, Croft & Hackett
Dunn, Croft & Hackett
Dunn, Croft & Hackett
To cite this Article Dunn, Kate M. , Croft, Peter R. and Hackett, Geoffrey I.(2000) 'Satisfaction in the Sex Life of a General
Population Sample', Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26: 2, 141 — 151
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/009262300278542
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/009262300278542
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26:141–151, 2000
Copyright ©2000 Brunner/Mazel
0092-623X /00 $12.00 + .00
Much clinical research in the field of sexual behavior, problems, and satisfac-
tion has focused on selected samples, such as people attending sexual dys-
function clinics. Some studies have been carried out on broader based samples,
and the estimations of satisfaction from these studies vary widely. Pepe,
Panella, Pepe, and D’Agosta (1989) reported that 38% of women attending a
gynecology clinic in Italy were not satisfied with their sexual relationship.
Rosen, Taylor, Leiblum, and Bachmann (1993) reported a 25% prevalence of
dissatisfaction among women registered with a gynecology clinic in the United
States. A 21% level of sexual dissatisfaction was reported in a sample of
British men selected through their workplace (Spector & Boyle, 1986).
The differences in levels of satisfaction between men and women have
been investigated in a number of studies, and the results are inconclusive.
One study in Israel, of family practice attenders, reported that male respon-
141
142 K. M. Dunn et al.
than desired (Rosen et al., 1993), whereas in a study of older men in the
United States (Panser et al., 1995), only 16% said that they were dissatisfied
with their level of sexual activity.
The relationship between satisfaction and sexual dysfunction is a com-
plicated issue, which has only been investigated in a small number of stud-
ies. One study reported that dissatisfaction with sex life was highest in men
with erectile problems (Panser et al., 1995), and another stated that a stron-
ger association was with premature ejaculation (Moore & Goldstein, 1980).
One study of married couples (Frank et al., 1978) found that sexual dysfunc-
tion was related to dissatisfaction, but the relation was stronger in women,
particularly in women with arousal problems. Two further studies (Catania,
Pollack, McDermott, Qualls, & Cole, 1990; Spector & Boyle, 1986) of partici-
pants selected from social and work situations have reported a general asso-
ciation between sexual problems and dissatisfaction. However, other work
on a random sample of married Swedish men and in Israeli family practice
attenders found that sexual satisfaction was not related to sexual dysfunction
(Nettelbladt & Uddenberg, 1979; Shahar et al., 1991). The most recent and
authoritative survey has been the analysis of the U.S. National Health and
Social Life Survey (Laumann, Palk, & Rosen, 1999). The authors reported
strong associations of sexual dysfunction with emotional and physical satis-
faction and with feelings of general happiness. Low desire in both genders,
arousal disorder in women, and erectile dysfunction in men were the cat-
egories most strongly associated with dissatisfaction.
Although most research has focused on people in heterosexual relation-
ships, one study that recruited homosexual men and women through adver-
tising and organizations (Bell & Weinberg, 1978) found levels of sexual prob-
lems similar to those found in studies of heterosexuals.
Contrasting results have emerged from work on the effect of sexual
problems on the satisfaction of the partner. Two studies (Frank et al., 1978;
Rust, Golombok, & Collier, 1988) have reported that sexual dysfunction in
the wife had no bearing on male sexual satisfaction, whereas another study
reported that 64% of female dissatisfaction was due to premature ejaculation
Sexual Satisfaction in the General Population 143
in the partner (Moore & Goldstein, 1980). The most recent U.S. report
(Laumann et al., 1999) did not specifically examine the effect of sexual prob-
lems and dissatisfaction on quality of life in the partner.
In summary, there has been limited investigation on satisfaction in the
sexual relationship and its relation to other areas of sex life; the results from
a wide variety of study types are disparate and conflicting. This study pre-
sents an epidemiological investigation into sexual satisfaction and its related
components within a large general population sample of adults.
titioner emphasizing the importance of the work and the anonymity of the
questionnaire. A reply-paid envelope for the return of the questionnaire was
included. A reminder letter was sent to the entire sample approximately a
week after the mailing of the initial questionnaire: This second mailing could
not be restricted to nonresponders because of the need to preserve the
anonymity.
The data were entered into the Epi-info package (Dean et al., 1994).
Analysis was carried out using the STATA statistical package (StrataCorp,
1995). Categorical data were analyzed using chi-square tests for trend, on 1
degree of freedom. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calcu-
lated for the association between sexual dissatisfaction in respondents and
specific sexual problems.
Downloaded By: [B-on Consortium - 2007] At: 15:44 21 March 2011
RESULTS
1,768 adults (44% of the study population) replied to the survey. The median
age of the respondents was 50 years (range 18 to 75 years). Two hundred
and thirty-five men (34%) and 290 women (41%) reported having a current
sexual problem, the most common problems being erectile dysfunction and
premature ejaculation in men and vaginal dryness and orgasmic problems in
women.
Married 257 (48.6) 262 (49.5) 10 (1.9) 123 (20.8) 443 (74.8) 26 (4.4)
Living with 13 (38.2) 19 (55.9) 2 (5.9) 20 (31.7) 39 (61.9) 4 (6.3)
partner
Single 37 (64.9) 20 (35.1) — 23 (65.7) 11 (31.4) 1 (2.9)
Downloaded By: [B-on Consortium - 2007] At: 15:44 21 March 2011
Marital status did have a link with desired frequency of sex; although
numbers were small, the single, separated or widowed had similar high
proportions of those reporting less-than-desired frequency of sex, and, in
these categories, the overall gender differences in desired frequency were
abolished.
Finally, a suboptimal frequency of sex was more likely to be reported if
there was an accompanying perception of a problem with sex. This was
found to a similar extent in men and women.
dents themselves. In general, women thought that their partners were about
as satisfied as they were themselves, whereas men thought that their part-
ners were more satisfied than they were themselves.
TABLE 2. Own Satisfaction with Current Sex Life and Perception of Partner’s Satisfaction
Own Satisfaction Perception of Partner
N1 = 1,482 N2 = 1,244
Number (%) Number (%)
Satisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied
All 1111 (75.0) 371 (25.0) 1000 (80.4) 244 (19.6)
By age a
<45 495 (74.9) 166 (25.1) 452 (79.4) 117 (20.6)
45–64 427 (75.0) 142 (25.0) 390 (80.4) 95 (19.6)
>65 168 (75.0) 56 (25.0) 141 (82.5) 30 (17.5)
By gender b
Male 489 (69.9) 211 (30.1) 484 (82.9) 100 (17.1)
Female 622 (79.5) 160 (20.5) 516 (78.2) 144 (21.8)
By frequency*c
Never 169 (48.0) 183 (52.0) 113 (62.4) 68 (37.6)
< 1 per week 324 (70.9) 133 (29.1) 305 (71.9) 119 (28.1)
1 per week 280 (88.3) 37 (11.7) 263 (87.7) 37 (12.3)
2–3 per week 241 (95.3) 12 (4.7) 232 (95.1) 12 (4.9)
>3 per week 86 (96.6) 3 (3.4) 81 (93.1) 6 (6.9)
By self-perceived
problem*c
None 1022 (85.1) 179 (14.9) 898 (89.5) 105 (10.5)
1 or more 83 (30.9) 186 (69.1) 95 (40.6) 139 (59.4)
Note. p values are chi-square tests for linear trend, on 1 degree of freedom, and used the original four
categories: (extremely, quite) and dissatisfied (quite, extremely)
* numbers do not always add to column totals at top because of spoiled or missing answers to some
questions.
a
p = 0.4 (ns) for own satisfaction, p = 0.2 (ns) for perception of partner
b
p = 0.05 for own satisfaction, p = 0.2 for perception of partner
c
p < 0.05
Sexual Satisfaction in the General Population 147
Respondents were more likely to report that their partner was dissatis-
fied with their sex life if they perceived themselves to have a current sexual
problem (see Table 2). Of those with a problem, 59% thought that their
partner was extremely or quite dissatisfied, compared with 10% of those
without a problem.
There was a strong association between satisfaction in the respondent
and his or her perception of satisfaction in the partner. Sixty percent of
respondents who were dissatisfied themselves reported dissatisfaction in their
partner, whereas only 9% of respondents who were themselves satisfied
considered their partners to be dissatisfied, a difference of 51% (95% confi-
dence interval 44% to 57%).
Table 3 shows that the specific problems which caused the most dissatisfac-
tion in respondents were inhibited enjoyment followed by erectile problems
in men and arousal problems and dyspareunia in women.
DISCUSSION
b
Combination of difficulties with getting or maintaining an erection
c
A problem is recorded if making love was never or rarely a pleasant experience
d
A problem is recorded if a climax is never or rarely experienced
e
The odds ratio for the association between dissatisfaction and the specific sexual problem
partner has a problem or whether the problem in the partner causes the
dissatisfaction in the respondent.
By contrast, dissatisfaction in the partner was most likely to be per-
ceived by the respondents if they had a sexual problem themselves, if the
respondents themselves were dissatisfied, or if they thought that their part-
ner had a sexual problem. Dissatisfaction in the respondent was the stron-
gest predictor of his or her perception of dissatisfaction in the partner. This
may reflect the nature of reporting in this study, because all information
about the partner is reported by the respondent and respondents who are
dissatisfied may report that their partners are not satisfied due to low confi-
dence or other psychological factors. Whatever the explanation, it empha-
sizes that satisfaction is intractably linked to perceptions about the relation-
ship.
Downloaded By: [B-on Consortium - 2007] At: 15:44 21 March 2011
tions reported here. Our figures highlight in particular the considerable po-
tential impact that treatment of sexual problems might have on the levels of
sexual satisfaction in society.
REFERENCES
screen for psychosocial disorder. Journal of the Royal College of General Practi-
tioners, 38, 263–266.
Dean, A. D., Dean, J. A., Coulombier, D., Brendel, K. A., Smith, D. C., Burton, A. H.,
Dicker, R. C., Sullivan, K., Fagan, R. F., & Arner, T. G. (1994). Epi Info, version
6: A word processing, database and statistics program for epidemiology on
microcomputers. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., & Hackett, G. I. (1998). Sexual problems: A study of
prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Family Practice,
15, 519–524.
Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., & Hackett, G. I. (1999). The association of sexual problems
with social, psychological and physical problems in men and women: A cross-
sectional population survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,
53, 144–148.
Frank, E., Anderson, C., & Rubenstein, D. (1978). Frequency of sexual dysfunction
in “normal” couples. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 111–115.
Golombok, S., Rust, J., & Pickard, C. (1984). Sexual problems encountered in gen-
eral practice. British Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 210–211.
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United
States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association,
281, 537–544.
Moore, J. T., & Goldstein, Y. (1980). Sexual problems among family medicine pa-
tients. Journal of Family Practice, 10, 243–247.
Nettelbladt, P., & Uddenberg. N. (1979). Sexual dysfunction and sexual satisfaction
in 58 married Swedish men. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 23, 141–147.
Panser, L. A., Rhodes, T., Girman, C. J., Guess, H. A., Chute, C. G., Oesterling, J. E.,
Lieber, M. M., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1995). Sexual function of men ages 40 to 79
years: The Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among
Men. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society ,43, 1107–1111.
Pepe, F., Panella, M., Pepe, G., D’Agosta, S., & Pepe, P. (1989). Frequency of sexual
dysfunctions among Roman Catholic women. Family Practice, 6, 16–18.
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A.
(1997). The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional
scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822–830.
Sexual Satisfaction in the General Population 151
Rosen, R. C., Taylor, J. F., Leiblum, S. R., & Bachmann, G. A. (1993). Prevalence of
sexual dysfunction in women: Results of a survey study of 329 women in an
outpatient gynecological clinic. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 19, 171–188.
Rust, J., Golombok, S., & Collier, J. (1988). Marital problems and sexual dysfunction:
How are they related? British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 629–631.
Shahar, E., Lederer, J., & Herz, M. J. (1991). The use of a self-report questionnaire to
assess the frequency of sexual dysfunction in family practice clinics. Family
Practice, 8, 206–211.
Solstad, K., & Hertoft, P. (1993). Frequency of sexual problems and sexual dysfunc-
tion in middle-aged Danish men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 51–58.
Spector, K. R., & Boyle, M. (1986). The prevalence and perceived etiology of male
sexual problems in a non-clinical sample. British Journal of Medical Psychol-
ogy, 59, 351–358.
StrataCorp. (1995). Strata Statistical Software: Release 4.0. College Station, TX: Strata
Corporation.
Downloaded By: [B-on Consortium - 2007] At: 15:44 21 March 2011
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.