Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution
• Description p.1
• Audience p.2
• Impact Factor p.2
• Abstracting and Indexing p.2
• Editorial Board p.2
• Guide for Authors p.8
ISSN: 0269-7491
DESCRIPTION
.
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality research
papers and review articles about all aspects of environmental pollution and its effects on ecosystems
and human health. The journal welcomes high-quality process-oriented and hypothesis-based
submissions that report results from original and novel research and contribute new knowledge to
help address problems related to environmental pollution at a regional or global scale.
Papers focusing on the following areas are likely to be returned to the authors without
review:
• Routine surveys or monitoring programs primarily of local or regional interest;
• Descriptions of well-known contaminants, such as legacy pollutants, in yet another location;
• Studies relating to waste treatment that do not have specific relevance to pollution within the
environment;
• Synthesis/fabrication of new materials solely for remediation and/or mitigation of pollution without
any direct environmental relevance;
• Nitrogen or phosphorus deposition or biogeochemical processes with little or no relation to
environmental consequences and/or climate change;
• Studies on eutrophication and secondary pollution by eutrophication without illuminating their
governing mechanisms and factors;
Please DO NOT ask the Editors-in-Chief for permission before submitting a manuscript.
Kindly check the guidelines to determine whether your manuscript is within the scope of
the journal; if yes, please go ahead and submit it.
AUDIENCE
.
IMPACT FACTOR
.
PubMed/Medline
Environmental Periodicals Bibliography
Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences
Science Citation Index
AGRICOLA
Energy Information Abstracts
Embase
Air Pollution Control Association Journal
Biological and Agricultural Index
GeoSciTech
Web of Science
Scopus
EDITORIAL BOARD
.
Co-Editors-in-Chief
Jörg Rinklebe, University of Wuppertal School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wuppertal, Germany
Trace elements in the environment, Soil, Water, Plant, Environmental pollution
Christian Sonne, Aarhus University Department of Environmental Science, Roskilde, Denmark
Biological effects, environmental chemicals, infectious diseases, climate change, veterinary
science, wildlife medicine, predatory mammals, raptorial birds, sea birds, fish, internal organs,
reproductive organs, histopathology, morphology, skeletal system, bone density, immune system,
endocrinology, PBPK modelling, blood biochemistry, implantation of PTT satellite transmitters,
immobilization.
Eddy Zeng, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Persistent organic pollutants, Bioaccumulation, Human exposure, Health risk assessment, Inter-
compartmental diffusion flux, Passive sampling, Wet and dry deposition
Special Issue Editors
Da Chen, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Environmental chemistry, Analytical chemistry, Ecotoxicology, Persistent organic pollutants, Flame
retardants, Pesticides, Mass spectrometry, Gas/liquid chormatography
Su Shiung Lam, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Environmental Technology, Environmental Pollution, Thermal Process
(Pyrolysis, Gasification, Torrefaction), Waste Management, Biofuel, Waste Valorization/
Utilization, Energy Conversion, Water and Wastewater Treatment, Catalytic Application, Green
Material Synthesis, Biochar, Microwave, Wastewater, Pollution Detection/Mitigation, Green
Technology/Chemistry
Introduction
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality research
papers and review articles about all aspects of environmental pollution and its effects on ecosystems
and human health. The journal welcomes high-quality process-oriented and hypothesis-based
submissions that report results from original and novel research and contribute new knowledge to
help address problems related to environmental pollution at a regional or global scale.
Papers focusing on the following areas are likely to be returned to the authors without
review:
• Routine surveys or monitoring programs primarily of local or regional interest;
• Descriptions of well-known contaminants, such as legacy pollutants, in yet another location;
• Studies relating to waste treatment that do not have specific relevance to pollution within the
environment;
• Synthesis/fabrication of new materials solely for remediation and/or mitigation of pollution without
any direct environmental relevance;
• Nitrogen or phosphorus deposition or biogeochemical processes with little or no relation to
environmental consequences and/or climate change;
• Studies on eutrophication and secondary pollution by eutrophication without illuminating their
governing mechanisms and factors;
• Studies within which the concentrations of toxicants used are higher than those that are
typically found in an environmental pollution context. Authors of toxicology studies must justify the
concentrations that they are using by reference to environmentally relevant concentrations that have
been reported in the literature.
Please DO NOT ask the Editors-in-Chief for permission before submitting a manuscript.
Kindly check the guidelines to determine whether your manuscript is within the scope of
the journal; if yes, please go ahead and submit it.
The abstract (up to 300 words), highlights and conclusions of papers in this journal must contain clear
and concise statements. A graphical abstract is mandatory.
Review Articles: Authors may submit manuscripts that provide in-depth critical review of a special
subject. These reviews must provide a Synthesis and Critical Evaluation of the state of the knowledge
of the subject and indicate research directions. The Editors also periodically invite review articles.
Manuscripts should not exceed 10,000 words, as defined above.
We also encourage Systematic Reviews that provide a comprehensive summary and critical appraisal
of existing evidence. They relate to answering a research question, and are conducted using methods
which seek to minimize risk of bias in results and conclusions. A systematic review should include
a meta-analysis, which uses statistical techniques to pool the results of multiple individual studies
into a combined summary result.
Short Communication: Short Communications may be submitted that express opinions and
concerns, suggest research priorities and question conventional methodologies and conclusions.
Manuscripts should include an Abstract, Introduction, Presentation of the Concerns or Analysis and
Conclusions. References, Tables and Illustrations should be used sparingly. The manuscript should not
exceed 12 double-spaced pages. The Editors will evaluate all manuscripts for suitability of publication,
including peer review.
Correspondence: Readers are encouraged to write to any of the Editors (Letter to Editor) and raise
issues and concerns about papers published in the journal. Editors or authors will be invited to submit
a Reply to respond to points raised. The Editor will decide on the publication of Correspondence
and Replies based on scientific merit, importance to the raised issues, and interest to the general
audience. Correspondence and Replies of an unprofessional or unscientific nature, or containing
personal invective, will not be considered.
Corrigendum: Authors may submit Corrigenda to alert the readership to errors discovered in their
articles post-publication.
Special Issues: Proposals for Special Issues of Full Research Papers that focus on a specific topic
or theme will also be considered. Special Issues will be published on emerging thematic issues and
innovative conferences. An Editor or Associate Editor should be contacted early in the conference
planning process to get approval and for guidelines on special issues of the journal. Furthermore, the
Editors or Associate Editors will invite leading experts as Guest Editors for Special Issues. Editorials
for Special issues are submitted by invitation only through the Editorial Manager portal.
Submission checklist
You can use this list to carry out a final check of your submission before you send it to the journal for
review. Please check the relevant section in this Guide for Authors for more details.
One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address
Further considerations
• Manuscript has been 'spell checked' and 'grammar checked'
• All references mentioned in the Reference List are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the
Internet)
• A competing interests statement is provided, even if the authors have no competing interests to
declare
• Journal policies detailed in this guide have been reviewed
• Referee suggestions and contact details provided, based on journal requirements
Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for
experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
All animal experiments should comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and should be carried out in
accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines, EU
Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments, or the National Research Council's Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals and the authors should clearly indicate in the manuscript that such
guidelines have been followed. The sex of animals must be indicated, and where appropriate, the
influence (or association) of sex on the results of the study.
Declaration of competing interest
Corresponding authors, on behalf of all the authors of a submission, must disclose any financial
and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence
(bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies,
stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or
other funding. All authors, including those without competing interests to declare, should provide
the relevant information to the corresponding author (which, where relevant, may specify they have
nothing to declare). Corresponding authors should then use this tool to create a shared statement
and upload to the submission system at the Attach Files step. Please do not convert the .docx
template to another file type. Author signatures are not required.
Submission declaration and verification
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in
the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis, see 'Multiple, redundant or concurrent
publication' for more information), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that
its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where
the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in
During submission to Editorial Manager, you can choose to release your manuscript publicly as a
preprint on the preprint server SSRN once it enters peer-review with the journal. Your choice will have
no effect on the editorial process or outcome with the journal. Please note that the corresponding
author is expected to seek approval from all co-authors before agreeing to release the manuscript
publicly on SSRN.
You will be notified via email when your preprint is posted online and a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
is assigned. Your preprint will remain globally available free to read whether the journal accepts or
rejects your manuscript.
For more information about posting to SSRN, please consult the SSRN Terms of Use and FAQs.
Use of inclusive language
Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences,
and promotes equal opportunities. Content should make no assumptions about the beliefs or
commitments of any reader; contain nothing which might imply that one individual is superior to
another on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health
condition; and use inclusive language throughout. Authors should ensure that writing is free from bias,
stereotypes, slang, reference to dominant culture and/or cultural assumptions. We advise to seek
gender neutrality by using plural nouns ("clinicians, patients/clients") as default/wherever possible
to avoid using "he, she," or "he/she." We recommend avoiding the use of descriptors that refer
to personal attributes such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or
health condition unless they are relevant and valid. When coding terminology is used, we recommend
to avoid offensive or exclusionary terms such as "master", "slave", "blacklist" and "whitelist". We
suggest using alternatives that are more appropriate and (self-) explanatory such as "primary",
"secondary", "blocklist" and "allowlist". These guidelines are meant as a point of reference to help
identify appropriate language but are by no means exhaustive or definitive.
For transparency, authors must submit an author statement file outlining their individual contributions
to the paper using the relevant CRediT roles: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis;
Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software;
Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Roles/Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing.
Authorship statements should be formatted with the names of authors first and CRediT role(s)
following. More details and an example
Authors are asked to think carefully about the eligibility criteria for authorship, and ensure that
authorship is extended ONLY to those who have made substantial contributions to ALL of the following:
(1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of
data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval
of the version to be submitted.
Changes to authorship
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their
manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any
addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only
Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal
circulation within their institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution
outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. If
excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission
from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article. Elsevier has preprinted forms for
use by authors in these cases.
For gold open access articles: Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a
'License Agreement' (more information). Permitted third party reuse of gold open access articles is
determined by the author's choice of user license.
Author rights
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. More
information.
Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how you can share your research published in Elsevier journals.
Role of the funding source
You are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or
preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in
the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to
submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement, it is recommended
to state this.
Open access
Please visit our Open Access page for more information.
Elsevier Researcher Academy
Researcher Academy is a free e-learning platform designed to support early and mid-career
researchers throughout their research journey. The "Learn" environment at Researcher Academy
offers several interactive modules, webinars, downloadable guides and resources to guide you through
the process of writing for research and going through peer review. Feel free to use these free resources
to improve your submission and navigate the publication process with ease.
You should not suggest reviewers who are colleagues, or who have co-authored or collaborated with
you during the last three years. Editors do not invite reviewers who have potential competing interests
with the authors. Further, in order to provide a broad and balanced assessment of the work, and ensure
scientific rigor, please suggest diverse candidate reviewers who are located in different countries/
regions from the author group. Also consider other diversity attributes e.g. gender, race and ethnicity,
career stage, etc. Finally, you should not include existing members of the journal's editorial team,
of whom the journal are already aware.
Note: the editor decides whether or not to invite your suggested reviewers.
Authors of Research Papers, Review Articles and Short Communications are asked to suggest SIX
potential reviewers. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the originality, significance and technical quality
of the work, as well as the clarity of the manuscript, and the relevance of the subject matter to the
journal. The final decision for publication of all manuscripts is made by the Editor.
PREPARATION
Queries
For questions about the editorial process (including the status of manuscripts under review) or for
technical support on submissions, please visit our Support Center.
NEW SUBMISSIONS
Submission to this journal proceeds totally online and you will be guided stepwise through the creation
and uploading of your files. The system automatically converts your files to a single PDF file, which
is used in the peer-review process.
As part of the Your Paper Your Way service, you may choose to submit your manuscript as a single file
to be used in the refereeing process. This can be a PDF file or a Word document, in any format or lay-
out that can be used by referees to evaluate your manuscript. It should contain high enough quality
figures for refereeing. If you prefer to do so, you may still provide all or some of the source files at
the initial submission. Please note that individual figure files larger than 10 MB must be uploaded
separately.
References
There are no strict requirements on reference formatting at submission. References can be in any
style or format as long as the style is consistent. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/
book title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/book chapter and the article
number or pagination must be present. Use of DOI is highly encouraged. The reference style used by
the journal will be applied to the accepted article by Elsevier at the proof stage. Note that missing
data will be highlighted at proof stage for the author to correct.
Highlights should be submitted in a separate editable file in the online submission system. Please
use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including
spaces, per bullet point).
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers xxxx, yyyy];
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number zzzz]; and the United States Institutes
of Peace [grant number aaaa].
It is not necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants and awards. When
funding is from a block grant or other resources available to a university, college, or other research
institution, submit the name of the institute or organization that provided the funding.
If no funding has been provided for the research, it is recommended to include the following sentence:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors.
Units
Follow internationally accepted rules and conventions: use the international system of units (SI). If
other units are mentioned, please give their equivalent in SI.
Temperatures should be given in degrees Celsius.
A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it as a permanent link to any electronic article.
An example of a citation using DOI for an article not yet in an issue is: VanDecar J.C., Russo R.M.,
James D.E., Ambeh W.B., Franke M. (2003). Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath
northeastern Venezuela. Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000884.
Please note the format of such citations should be in the same style as all other references in the paper.
Web references
As a minimum, the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. Any
further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.),
should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a
different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.
Data references
This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them
in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. Data references should include the
following elements: author name(s), dataset title, data repository, version (where available), year,
and global persistent identifier. Add [dataset] immediately before the reference so we can properly
identify it as a data reference. The [dataset] identifier will not appear in your published article.
Preprint references
Where a preprint has subsequently become available as a peer-reviewed publication, the formal
publication should be used as the reference. If there are preprints that are central to your work or that
cover crucial developments in the topic, but are not yet formally published, these may be referenced.
Preprints should be clearly marked as such, for example by including the word preprint, or the name
of the preprint server, as part of the reference. The preprint DOI should also be provided.
Below are a number of ways in which you can associate data with your article or make a statement
about the availability of your data when submitting your manuscript. When sharing data in one of
these ways, you are expected to cite the data in your manuscript and reference list. Please refer to the
"References" section for more information about data citation. For more information on depositing,
sharing and using research data and other relevant research materials, visit the research data page.
Data linking
If you have made your research data available in a data repository, you can link your article directly to
the dataset. Elsevier collaborates with a number of repositories to link articles on ScienceDirect with
relevant repositories, giving readers access to underlying data that gives them a better understanding
of the research described.
There are different ways to link your datasets to your article. When available, you can directly link
your dataset to your article by providing the relevant information in the submission system. For more
information, visit the database linking page.
For supported data repositories a repository banner will automatically appear next to your published
article on ScienceDirect.
AFTER ACCEPTANCE
Online proof correction
To ensure a fast publication process of the article, we kindly ask authors to provide us with their proof
corrections within two days. Corresponding authors will receive an e-mail with a link to our online
proofing system, allowing annotation and correction of proofs online. The environment is similar to
MS Word: in addition to editing text, you can also comment on figures/tables and answer questions
from the Copy Editor. Web-based proofing provides a faster and less error-prone process by allowing
you to directly type your corrections, eliminating the potential introduction of errors.
If preferred, you can still choose to annotate and upload your edits on the PDF version. All instructions
for proofing will be given in the e-mail we send to authors, including alternative methods to the online
version and PDF.
We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately. Please use this
proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and correctness of the text, tables and
figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this
stage with permission from the Editor. It is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back
to us in one communication. Please check carefully before replying, as inclusion of any subsequent
corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibility.
Offprints
The corresponding author will, at no cost, receive a customized Share Link providing 50 days free
access to the final published version of the article on ScienceDirect. The Share Link can be used for
sharing the article via any communication channel, including email and social media. For an extra
charge, paper offprints can be ordered via the offprint order form which is sent once the article is
accepted for publication. Both corresponding and co-authors may order offprints at any time via
Elsevier's Author Services. Corresponding authors who have published their article gold open access
do not receive a Share Link as their final published version of the article is available open access on
ScienceDirect and can be shared through the article DOI link.
AUTHOR INQUIRIES
Visit the Elsevier Support Center to find the answers you need. Here you will find everything from
Frequently Asked Questions to ways to get in touch.
You can also check the status of your submitted article or find out when your accepted article will
be published.
© Copyright 2018 Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com