A Modified Phase Rule Equation A similar behaviour is exhibited by an intermetallic IT is well known that the Gibbs Phase Rule as compound with a submerged maximum, as, for applied to equilibrated macro-systems subject to example, changes of temperature, pressure and concentration AuSn, +t AuSn, + liquid ; may be written in the form but in this case the linkages involved are metallic. P +F = C + 2, These transition processes are conveniently termed where P is the number of phases, F the number of meritectic reactions (from meros, part ; tectic, melting) degrees of freedom and O the number of components. to distinguish them from the ordinary peritectic In applying the equation to physical and chemical reactions of solid solutions. Applying the equation equilibrium, the number of components O is ta.ken to a binary system of two solid solutions undergoing as the minimum number of independently variable peritectic reaction, constituents in terms of which the equilibrium may ex +t + liquid, be expressed in the form of a chemical equation. we have The term 'number of components' has thus to bear the brunt of the matter and assume a responsibility 4 + 0 + R = 2 + 2 - 0 ; and R = 0. not shouldered by the equation itself. In fact, it is It is clear, therefore, that the peritectic transforma- frequently necessary to write out a properly balanced tion of solid solutions does not involve the rupture chemical equation in order to decide upon the number of chemical or metallic linkages. of components in the system. Moreover, the equation The modified equation, while removing the bugbear cannot be applied without making allowance for of the term component, is also of utility in other certain restrictions when the phases approach directions and in my opinion is much more easy to identity, as in critical phenomena., or when one of the apply than the customary equation. substances is kept in a definite weight-ratio to some other substance in the system, as in dissociation s. T. BOWDEN. University College, phenomena. Cardiff. In view of these difficulties it is perhaps desirable Jan. 17. to state the Phase Rule in terms more readily compre- hended by the ordinary chemist and metallurgist. If we retain the original definitions of phases and degrees of freedom and let C be the total number of Constitution of Heavy Water chemical constituents (that is, actual chemical ON lines similar to the investigation by one of us substances) present in the system we may write on ordinary water 1, 1, we have studied the Raman band of heavy water (99·6 per cent D 2O) at different P + F + R = C + 2 - r, temperatures ranging from 6° to 100° C. Within where R is the number ofreversible chemical reactions this range, the principal band for this substance is occurring in the system, and r, the restriction term, very broad and diffuse, extending in its Raman is equal to the number of pairs of phases having the frequencies from 2,254 to 2,784 cm-1 • It shows a same concentration or composition. This equation structure similar to that of ordinary water, having may then be applied without reference to stoichio- at 30° C. three components merging into one another metric chemical equations and without recourse to any process of choosing components. Thus in the thermal dissociation of calcium carbonate : CaCOs +t CaO + CO 2 , we have three constituents and one reversible chemical reaction so that 3 + F + I = 3 + 2 - 0 ; that is, F = I. -8216
Again, in the dissociation of ammonium chloride
NH.Cl +t NH 3 + HCl, we have a reversible chemical reaction and also one - 3435 pair of phases (the solid phase and the gas phase) with identical composition, so that - 3582 2 +F + I = 3 +2- I ; that is, F = I. The equation also leads to a clear differentiation between physical and chemical change in transition processes. We know, for example, that the system Na 2SO, IO H 2O +t Na 2 SO, + liquid with their maxima at 2,394, 2,534 and 2,674 cm-1 • containing three substances (decahydrate, anhydrous The one important characteristic of this band, as salt and water) is invariant (that is, F = 0). Accord- compared to that of ordinary water which earlier ingly, workers with this substance 3 ,',6 failed to record, is 4 + 0 + R = 3 + 2 - 0 and R = I. the difference in the relative intensities of the three components. The accompanying microphotometric The point is thus an incongruent melting point arising curves of the bands for the two types of water were from the rupture or formation of chemical linkages. ta.ken at 30° C. It is clear from the curves that for
Experimental Determination and Thermodynamic Modeling of Methane and Nitrogen Hydrates in The Presence of THF, Propylene Oxide, 1,4-Dioxane and Acetone