On Job

Consensus
Volume 13
Issue 2 Canadian Lutheranism, Yesterday and Article 9
Tomorrow
11-1-1987
On Job: God-Talk and the Suffering of the

Innocent
Ragnar C. Teigen
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus
Recommended Citation
Teigen, Ragnar C. (1987) "On Job: God-Talk and the Suffering of the Innocent," Consensus: Vol. 13 : Iss. 2 , Article 9.
Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus/vol13/iss2/9
This Book Reviews is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consensus by an
authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected].
92 Consensus
On Job; God-Talk and the Suffering of the Innocent

Gustavo Gutierrez
Translated from the Spanish by Matthew J. O’Connell
Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1987
136 pp.,$8.95 U.S. paperback.
A wealth of material hcis been produced about the book of Job. Praised
as one of the masterpieces in world literature Job’s versatility has made
possible a range of treatments from technical commentaries to semi-popular
works, not to mention adaptation in drama form. To this array has now
been added the monograph under review with perspectives from a liberation
theologian which have not been highlighted, if mentioned at all, in Western
interpretations. For this reason alone the book by Gutierrez is worthy of
careful attention.
In his introduction (xi-xix) Gutierrez poses a question of primary im-
portance to the Latin America context: ^How art we to talk about Godf*
(author’s italics). More particularly: “How are we to talk about God from
within a specific situation — namely the suffering of the innocent?” It is
from this vantage point that the author explores the Book of Job.
Part I, “The Wager”, with three short chapters, involving reflections on
the prologue, epilogue in part, (42:7-17), and aspects of the poem (espe-
cially chapter 3), focuses on God’s wager with Satan that Job serves God
with no thought of reward. Satan provokes the dare; 1:9, “Does Job fear
God for nought?” (The inquiry in the mouth of Satan seems a supreme
irony. Was this the Joban author’s intent?) Emergent from this conversa-
tion are calamities in chapters 1-2 and the dramatic transformation of Job
as result from a patient hero to a titan in struggle, chapter 3. The whole
becomes a testing ground profound question about disinterested re-
for the
ligion. God spoke well of end. The point was made. Satan lost!
Job in the
In between lay the desolate land where Job struggled in suffering protests
of innocency. Disinterested religion, diametrically opposed to reward (the
obverse of retribution as Gutierrez notes), had its price.
Part II, “The Language of Prophecy”, comprising chapters 3-6, features
Job in strident debate with his competent but theoretically misguided the-
ologian friends. Their abstract doctrine of retribution —
Job is ill, he must
—
have sinned leaves Job in frustration but w'ith a growing realization in
the debate that other suffering innocents exist. (In chapters 29:31, e.g., he
himself remembers his practical care of the poor.) Not only is this God’s
will but it also “provides firm ground for prophetic talk of God”. (See pages
47-49 for a convenient summary of Part II.)
Part III, “The Language of Contemplation”, chapters 7-10, identifies
Job in rumination over his suffering yet acknowledging that all things come
from God. Gutierrez includes in these chapters on contemplation the pas-
sages where a mediator, if briefly, appears in Job's consciousness. Called the
Book Reviews 93
“Arbiter” in 9:15ff., the “Witness”, 16:18-22 and the “Avenger” (Kinsman-

Redeemer) in 19:25-27, the mediator as an existent reality is not in doubt.
It is his identity which is in question. The arguments are drawn between

those who see God himself as the go-between, so Gutierrez among others
(page 65), and those who propose an intermediary between God and Job.
Conclusions on either side seem indefinite save in the minds of proponents
based on their careful research. One can possibly argue the second of the
options since a variety of intermediate beings between the divine and hu-
man worlds appear in the Old Testament. The passages, in any event, point
to Job in the depth of anguish reaching out for help beyond himself.
The contemplative theme includes the Yahweh speeches, Job 38-42
which to assume an enchantment due to the sympathetic
this reviewer
exposition given them by Gutierrez. The chapters represent, in this light,
“the mysterious meeting of two freedoms”. One might have thought of these
speeches as a divine bombast of response to Job but scarcely an answer to
his painful demands for justice on behalf of his innocency. Gutierrez prefers
to think of these speeches and Job’s laments as two freedoms. “The final
chapters of the Book of Job tell us of the meeting of these two freedoms.
Job’s freedom finds expression in his complaints and rebellion; God’s free-
dom finds expression in the gratuitousness of the divine love that refuses
to be confined within a system of predictable rewards and punishments”
(page 80).
In his “Conclusion” Gutierrez asks, “How are we to speak of God” in
conditions where massive murder occurs and “contempt for human life”
is so common? “Job shows us the way with his vigorous protest”, his
commitment to the poor “and his acknowledgement of the gratuitousness
that characterizes God’s plan for human
history” (page 102).
A rich supply ofendnotes for each chapter completes the book. The
monograph is readable, non-pedantic, yet scholarly all at once. Not only
are Spanish works interspersed in the endnotes but salient works on Job
from North American and European scholars. A scripture index is included
at the end. An alphabetized bibliography would have been of help but a
monograph of 136 pages will have such a limitation for the sake of space.
The reviewer considers the themes of “disinterested religion” and “suf-
fering innocency” as especial contributions in this pertinent and refreshing
volume. Innocency should not be theologically confused with sinfulness.
The latter is not the issue in this context. Gutierrez comments: “In his
resolute defense of his innocence. Job does not make the mistake of regard-
ing himself as sinless” (page 24). He knows himself to be a “sinner like
every other human being, but he declares himself innocent as far as his
sufferings are concerned” (page 73).
Given our present world conflagrations where justice seems hidden un-
der sinister oppressions this volume is more than timely.
Ragnar C. Teigen
Waterloo Lutheran Seminary

On Job

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

On Job

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

On Job

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Consensus

On Job: God-Talk and the Suffering of the

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus

On Job; God-Talk and the Suffering of the Innocent

“Arbiter” in 9:15ff., the “Witness”, 16:18-22 and the “Avenger” (Kinsman-

It is his identity which is in question. The arguments are drawn between

You might also like