Capafons Et. Al (1998)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Capafons et al.

(1998) – Systematic desensitization in the


treatment of fear of flying

Aim: To investigate whether systematic desensitization is an effective treatment of disturbed fears


and to specifically investigate whether systematic desensitization is an effective treatment for a fear of
flying.

Participants:
- Recruitment: They were recruited via a media campaign (volunteer sampling), which
informed them of the opportunity to take part in a free-of-charge intervention
programme aimed at treating the fear of flying.

- Population: Total of 41 participants


20 of these (8 males and 12 females) were randomly assigned to the treatment group (the
group that would be subject to the systematic desensitisation therapy).
The remaining 21 (9 males and 12 females) were assigned to the control group ( waiting for
systematic desensitisation therapy).

3 diagnostic scales were used to assess participants' fear of flying:


 IDG-FV = Spanish general diagnostic information tool (3 questions)
 EMV = Measures for assessing the dependant variables pre and post-treatment :
- fear displayed during the flight
- fear of flight preliminaries, e.g. going to the airport, obtaining booking card, etc.
- fear without involvement - e.g. seeing a plane.
 EPAV = Scales of Expectation of Danger and Anxiety.
Measured the occurrence of catastrophic thoughts, such as the fear of the engine catching fire.

Procedure:
o Participants were interviewed individually and completed the IDG-FV. Came back to watch a
video of a plane trip. Just before watching the video, there was a habituation session, it was
here that the participants' heart rate, temperature and muscle tension were measured for three
minutes prior to the showing of the video.

o An interview appointment was made either for presenting the treatment to be followed
(treatment group) or for the next assessment session (control group). The interval between pre
and post- test sessions was about eight weeks. For the treatment group this involved two one-
hour sessions a week and 12 to 15 sessions in total. The session used traditional training
techniques of breathing, progressive muscle relaxation and imagination. After eight weeks,
the treatment and control group were invited back to retake the questionnaire and simulated
video test.

Results: For the control group, the 'mere passing of time' without any form of treatment did not lead
to any reduction in the participants' assessment of their own fear of flying or objective measures of
arousal. Yet, for the treatment group ( with the exception of 2 participants), there was a significant
reduction in the participants' self-reported levels of fear as well as in objective physiological
measures.

Conclusion: It was concluded that systematic desensitisation is effective in reducing the fear of
flying. It was also concluded that the simple passage of time did not help reduce the phobias as there
was no improvement seen in the control groups.

You might also like