Laurel vs. Misa (G.R. No.l-409, January 30, 1947)
Laurel vs. Misa (G.R. No.l-409, January 30, 1947)
Laurel vs. Misa (G.R. No.l-409, January 30, 1947)
belligerent (hostile and aggressive) occupation. Thus, the law on treason is still in effect during such
times.
Facts. The SC, in a resolution, acted on the petition for the writ of habeas corpus2 filed by
petitioner Laurel based on the theory that a Filipino citizen who adhered to the enemy
giving the latter aid and comfort during the Japanese occupation cannot be
prosecuted for the crime of treason3 defined and penalized by Art 114 of the RPC
for the reason that
(1) That the sovereignty of the legitimate govt in the Phils and, consequently, the
correlative allegiance of Filipino citizens thereto was then suspended; and
(2) that there was a change of sovereignty over these Islands upon the proclamation of
the Phil Republic.
Issues.
(1) Is the sovereignty of the legitimate govt in the Phils suspended during the
Japanese occupation?
(2) Does the law on treason still apply even during the Japanese occupation?
Held.
(1) No. The absolute and permanent allegiance of the inhabitants of a territory
occupied by the enemy to their legitimate govt or sovereign is not abrogated or
severed by the enemy occupation, because the sovereignty of the govt or
sovereign de jure is not transferred thereby to the occupier.
(2) Yes. Since the preservation of allegiance of the obligation of fidelity and
obedience of a citizen or subject to his government or sovereign does not demand
from him a positive action but only passive attitude or forbearance from adhering
to the enemy by giving the latter aid and comfort, the occupant has no power to
repeal or suspend the operation of the law of treason, essential for the
preservation of the allegiance owed by the inhabitants to their legitimate
government, or compel them to adhere and give aid and comfort to him; because
it is evident that such action is not demanded by the exigencies of the military
services or not necessary for the control of the inhabitants and the safety and
protection of his army, and because it is tantamount to practically transferring
temporarily to the occupant their allegiance to the titular government or
sovereignty.
1
Abrogate- repeal or do away with (a law, right, or formal agreement).
2
The "Great Writ" of habeas corpus is a fundamental right in the Constitution that protects against unlawful and indefinite
imprisonment. Translated from Latin it means "show me the body." Habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument to
safeguard individual freedom against arbitrary executive power.
3
The crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.