OPIc Familiarization Guide 2020
OPIc Familiarization Guide 2020
OPIc Familiarization Guide 2020
PROFICIENCY
INTERVIEW -
COMPUTER
FAMILIARIZATION
GUIDE
No portion of this document may be reproduced or reprinted without the written permission of ACTFL.
ACTFL OPIc
FAMILIARIZATION GUIDE
WHAT IS ACTFL?
ACTFL is a membership organization of world language professionals
dedicated to promoting and fostering the study of languages and cultures
as an integral component of education and society. ACTFL’s membership
includes more than 13,000 language educators and administrators from
elementary through graduate education, as well as government and
industry. Since 1967, ACTFL has led the field in world language research
and assessments, while publishing, and disseminating performance and
proficiency standards that guide best practices for language learning,
teaching, and assessment.
WHAT IS CARD?
The ACTFL Center for Assessment Research and Development (CARD)
supports PK-12 schools and institutions of higher education in areas of
assessment, articulation, and research. To that end, CARD develops and
maintains high-quality language proficiency assessments, and certifies,
norms, and maintains highly reliable testers and raters of the assessments.
Research focuses on proficiency and performance standards and
outcomes that inform language teaching and learning. CARD collaborates
with state and national language organizations and government agencies
to support research in quality language teaching and learning, including
examination of the implications for teacher education. CARD aims to help
bridge the divide between language research and classroom practice.
1 The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 may be used for non-profit, educational purposes only,
provided that they are reproduced in their entirety, with no alterations, and with credit t
o ACTFL.
The ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) assesses how well a person speaks a language. It is an
assessment of the Interpersonal Listening and Speaking mode of communication, as described in the
World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages. It uses a standardized elicitation procedure for
the global assessment of functional speaking ability. The ACTFL OPI is interactive and continuously
adapts to the i speaking abilities of the test taker. Through a series of personalized questions, a
sample of speech is elicited. At the conclusion of the OPI, the test taker’s performance is compared
to the criteria described in the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 - Speaking, and a proficiency rating
is awarded.
Because the OPI is proficiency-based, it assesses a speaker’s ability to use the language effectively
and appropriately in real-life situations, in a spontaneous and non-rehearsed context, regardless of
when, where, why, or how a speaker has acquired their language. The OPI is not an achievement
test, assessing a speaker’s acquisition of specific aspects of course and curriculum content, nor is it
tied to any specific method of instruction. In addition, the OPI rating protocol does not compare an
individual’s performance to another’s performance. Rather, the OPI tester compares the features of
the language to assessment criteria in the Guidelines in order to award a holistic proficiency rating.
The Oral Proficiency Interview-Computer (OPIc) is an internet-delivered test which provides valid and
reliable oral proficiency testing for both small-group and large-scale testing. The computer-delivered
assessment emulates the qualities of the “live” OPI. A virtual avatar takes the place of a live tester
and asks questions based the test taker’s response to a background questionnaire. The selection and
delivery of the questions is through a carefully designed computer program. The goal of the OPIc
is the same as the “live” OPI: to obtain a ratable sample of speech which a rater can evaluate and
compare to the descriptors in the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 – Speaking in order to assign a
rating. The OPIc measures the full range of proficiency on the ACTFL scale, from Novice to Superior.
The ACTFL OPIc is appropriate for both small-group and large-scale testing. Hundreds of speakers
can take the test online at the same time. The recording of their responses is made available via the
Internet to Certified OPIc Raters and is evaluated by them within a short period of time. Because of
the availability of access to the test, speakers can take an OPIc easily, anywhere in the world.
While the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 – Speaking describe five major levels of spoken
language proficiency (Distinguished, Superior, Advanced, Intermediate, Novice), the ACTFL Rating
Scale (derived from the Guidelines) encompasses four major levels. These are:
Figure 1
Superior
Can support opinion, hypothesize, discuss
topic concretely and abstractly, and handle
a linguistically unfamiliar situation.
Advanced
Can narrate and describe in all major time frames
and handle a situation with a complication.
Intermediate
Can create with language, ask and answer simple
questions on familiar topics, and handle a simple
situation or transaction.
Novice
Can communicate minimally with formulaic
and rote utterance, lists, and phrases.
Figure 1: Inverted Pyramid Representing ACTFL Rating Scale with Major Levels and Global Tasks.
The four major levels are delineated according to a hierarchy of global tasks. This hierarchy is
summarized in a rating scale spanning a wide range of performance profiles, from those of speakers
who are able to participate effectively in most formal and informal conversations on practical, social,
and professional topics and issues to those of beginning learners. The scale describes a full range of
proficiency, from Superior to Novice.
Three of the major levels are further divided by minor borders into High, Mid and Low sublevels.
These sublevels differ from each other in terms of the quantity as well as the quality of language
produced and in some cases by the tasks performed.
Figure 2
Figure 2: Inverted Pyramid Representing ACTFL Rating Scale with Major Levels
The OPIc is an integrative test, i.e., it addresses a number of abilities simultaneously and looks at
them from a global perspective rather than based on the presence or absence of any given linguistic
feature. Linguistic components are viewed from the wider context of their contribution to overall
speaking performance. In evaluating a speech sample, the following criteria are considered:
A summary of the assessment criteria as they relate to the four major proficiency levels of the OPIc
are shown below
Discuss familiar and Most informal and formal No pattern of error in basic
unfamiliar topics. settings structures Errors virtually
Extended
Superior Support opinions, Wide range of public interest never interfere with
discourse
hypothesize, and deal topics and some special fields communication or distract
with topics abstractly. of interest and expertise from the message
* A rating at any major level is arrived at by the sustained performance of the functions of the level, with the degree of
accuracy and the text type described for that level. The performance must be sustained across ALL of the criteria for the
level in order to be rated at that level.
Before beginning the OPIc, test takers complete a Background Survey and a Self-Assessment. They
also receive a complete explanation of OPIc test procedures and instructions, including a sample test
question. These instructions are delivered in the test taker’s native language.
The Background Survey is a questionnaire which elicits information about the test taker’s work,
school, home, personal activities and interests. The test taker completes the survey and the answers
determine the pool of topics from which the computer will randomly select questions. The variety of
topics, the types of questions, and the range of possible combinations the computer can generate
allow for individually designed interviews. Even if two test takers selected the same combination of
Background Survey responses, the resulting test would not be the same.
The Self-Assessment provides six different descriptions of how well a person can speak a language.
Test takers select the description that they feel most accurately describes their language ability.
Samples of speech accompany each descriptor, so test takers can also listen to samples to help
select the most appropriate description. The Self-Assessment choice determines which OPIc test
form is generated for the specific individual. The choices made by the test taker in response to the
Background Survey and the Self-Assessment assure that each test taker receives an appropriate and
unique test.
The OPIc provides detailed test instructions and directions on how to listen to the questions and
record answers. In order to ensure that the test taker understands these instructions, a sample
question is provided for the test taker to practice with the functionality of the OPIc. The test taker
has the opportunity to review the instructions and sample question again before beginning the test.
After becoming familiar with the functionality of the online system, the test taker then begins the
OPIc test.
The OPIc tester is personify by an avatar. Test takers listen to the avatar’s questions and respond.
Having the picture of Ava or Avery on the screen helps to engage the test takers and mimics a
one-on-one conversation with a speaker of the target language.
All OPIc tests start with: Let’s start the interview now. Tell me something about yourself.
This functions as a warm-up and an opportunity for the test taker to begin using the language.
This activity is not rated.
Form 1
Ratings from Novice Low through Intermediate Low can be assigned to a speech sample that is
elicited using Form 1.
Form 2
Ratings from Novice Low through Intermediate High can be assigned to a speech sample that is
elicited using Form 2.
Form 3
Ratings from Novice Low through Advanced Low can be assigned to a speech sample that is
elicited using Form 3.
Form 4
Ratings from Intermediate High through Advanced High can be assigned to a speech sample
that is elicited using Form 4.
Form 5
Ratings from Advanced Mid through Superior can also be assigned to a speech sample that is
elicited using Form 5.
Once OPIc test is complete, the speech sample is uploaded and saved automatically on a secure
Internet site. Certified OPIc Raters listen to each sample and select the best match between the
sample and the assessment criteria of the rating scale. A rating at any major level is arrived at by
the sustained performance across ALL the criteria of the level. An appropriate sublevel can then
be determined, and the rating is assigned.
ACTFL Certified OPIc Raters are highly specialized language professionals who have completed a
rigorous certification and calibration process that concludes with a rater’s demonstrated ability to
consistently rate samples with a high degree of reliability. ACTFL Certified Raters uphold the highest
professional and ethical standards in test administration, rating, and confidentiality. They maintain
the confidentiality of the test takers and their responses. ACTFL Certified Raters adhere to the rating
protocol under the supervision of the ACTFL Quality Assurance Office while serving as raters for
Language Testing International (LTI), the Exclusive Licensee of ACTFL assessments. ACTFL Certified
OPIc Raters agree to abide by the exclusivity of the OPIc as ACTFL property. Raters are required
to follow all OPIc procedures and guidelines, as well as any other information received on behalf of
ACTFL and LTI.
Official ACTFL OPIc ratings provide a common metric for describing a speaker’s functional ability in
a spoken language. For this reason, the ACTFL OPIc is currently being used for a variety of purposes
in academic, commercial, and government communities.
In academic contexts, the OPIc is used for purposes of placement as well as formative and
summative assessments, and determination of the fulfillment of exit or graduation requirements.
Establishing proficiency outcomes in terms of the descriptors contained in the ACTFL Proficiency
Guidelines 2012 – Speaking provides a framework for design and development of curriculum for
language courses and sequences of language courses. Proficiency testing of students is also used
as a means of evaluating the effectiveness of language programs. In commercial and government
contexts, the OPIc is used as a means of certification, qualification, and promotion
Accommodations for ACTFL assessments can be requested from Language Testing International
(LTI), Exclusive Licensee of ACTFL. Available accommodations include, and are not limited to,
extended testing time, extended breaks, screen magnification, human reader, oral interpreter for
directions, testing environment adjustments, blank scratch paper, etc. LTI’s accommodation team
works with candidates to provide reasonable and appropriate accommodations.
Tarrytown, NY 10591
www.languagetesting.com
800-486-8444
PREFACE
The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 – Speaking describe five major
levels of proficiency: Distinguished, Superior, Advanced, Intermediate, and
Novice. The description of each major level is representative of a specific
range of abilities. Together these levels form a hierarchy in which each
level subsumes all lower levels. The major levels Advanced, Intermediate,
and Novice are divided into High, Mid, and Low sublevels.
The Guidelines describe the tasks that speakers can handle at each level,
as well as the content, context, accuracy, and discourse types associated
with tasks at each level. They also present the limits that speakers
encounter when attempting to function at the next higher major level.
These Guidelines can be used to evaluate speech that is either
Interpersonal (interactive, two-way communication) or Presentational
(one-way, non-interactive).
Speakers at the Distinguished level are able to use language skillfully, and with accuracy, efficiency,
and effectiveness. They are educated and articulate users of the language. They can reflect on a wide
range of global issues and highly abstract concepts in a culturally appropriate manner. Distinguished-
level speakers can use persuasive and hypothetical discourse for representational purposes, allowing
them to advocate a point of view that is not necessarily their own. They can tailor language to a
variety of audiences by adapting their speech and register in ways that are culturally authentic.
Speakers at the Distinguished level produce highly sophisticated and tightly organized extended
discourse. At the same time, they can speak succinctly, often using cultural and historical references
to allow them to say less and mean more. At this level, oral discourse typically resembles written
discourse.
SUPERIOR
Speakers at the Superior level are able to communicate with accuracy and fluency in order to
participate fully and effectively in conversations on a variety of topics in formal and informal settings
from both concrete and abstract perspectives. They discuss their interests and special fields of
competence, explain complex matters in detail, and provide lengthy and coherent narrations, all with
ease, fluency, and accuracy. They present their opinions on a number of issues of interest to them,
such as social and political issues, and provide structured arguments to support these opinions. They
are able to construct and develop hypotheses to explore alternative possibilities.
When appropriate, these speakers use extended discourse without unnaturally lengthy hesitation
to make their point, even when engaged in abstract elaborations. Such discourse, while coherent,
may still be influenced by language patterns other than those of the target language. Superior-level
speakers employ a variety of interactive and discourse strategies, such as turn-taking and separating
main ideas from supporting information through the use of syntactic, lexical, and phonetic devices.
Speakers at the Superior level demonstrate no pattern of error in the use of basic structures,
although they may make sporadic errors, particularly in low-frequency structures and in complex
high-frequency structures. Such errors, if they do occur, do not distract the native interlocutor or
interfere with communication.
Speakers at the Advanced level engage in conversation in a clearly participatory manner in order to
communicate information on autobiographical topics, as well as topics of community, national, or
international interest. The topics are handled concretely by means of narration and description in the
major time frames of past, present, and future. These speakers can also deal with a social situation
with an unexpected complication. The language of Advanced-level speakers is abundant, the oral
paragraph being the measure of Advanced-level length and discourse. Advanced-level speakers have
sufficient control of basic structures and generic vocabulary to be understood by native speakers of
the language, including those unaccustomed to non-native speech.
Advanced High
Speakers at the Advanced High sublevel perform all Advanced-level tasks with
linguistic ease, confidence, and competence. They are consistently able to explain
in detail and narrate fully and accurately in all time frames. In addition, Advanced
High speakers handle the tasks pertaining to the Superior level but cannot sustain
performance at that level across a variety of topics. They may provide a structured
argument to support their opinions, and they may construct hypotheses, but patterns
of error appear. They can discuss some topics abstractly, especially those relating to
their particular interests and special fields of expertise, but in general, they are more
comfortable discussing a variety of topics concretely.
Advanced Mid
Speakers at the Advanced Mid sublevel are able to handle with ease and confidence
a large number of communicative tasks. They participate actively in most informal
and some formal exchanges on a variety of concrete topics relating to work, school,
home, and leisure activities, as well as topics relating to events of current, public, and
personal interest or individual relevance.
Advanced Mid speakers demonstrate the ability to narrate and describe in the major
time frames of past, present, and future by providing a full account, with good control
of aspect. Narration and description tend to be combined and interwoven to relate
relevant and supporting facts in connected, paragraph-length discourse.
Advanced Low
Speakers at the Advanced Low sublevel are able to handle a variety of communicative
tasks. They are able to participate in most informal and some formal conversations on
topics related to school, home, and leisure activities. They can also speak about some
topics related to employment, current events, and matters of public and community
interest.
Advanced Low speakers demonstrate the ability to narrate and describe in the
major time frames of past, present, and future in paragraph-length discourse
with some control of aspect. In these narrations and descriptions, Advanced Low
speakers combine and link sentences into connected discourse of paragraph length,
although these narrations and descriptions tend to be handled separately rather than
interwoven. They can handle appropriately the essential linguistic challenges presented
by a complication or an unexpected turn of events.
Responses produced by Advanced Low speakers are typically not longer than a
single paragraph. The speaker’s dominant language may be evident in the use of
false cognates, literal translations, or the oral paragraph structure of that language. At
times their discourse may be minimal for the level, marked by an irregular flow, and
containing noticeable self-correction. More generally, the performance of Advanced
Low speakers tends to be uneven.
INTERMEDIATE
Speakers at the Intermediate level are distinguished primarily by their ability to create with the
language when talking about familiar topics related to their daily life. They are able to recombine
learned material in order to express personal meaning. Intermediate-level speakers can ask simple
questions and can handle a straightforward survival situation. They produce sentence-level language,
ranging from discrete sentences to strings of sentences, typically in present time. Intermediate-level
speakers are understood by interlocutors who are accustomed to dealing with non-native learners of
the language.
Intermediate High
Intermediate High speakers are able to converse with ease and confidence when
dealing with the routine tasks and social situations of the Intermediate level. They
are able to handle successfully uncomplicated tasks and social situations requiring
an exchange of basic information related to their work, school, recreation, particular
interests, and areas of competence.
Intermediate High speakers can handle a substantial number of tasks associated with
the Advanced level, but they are unable to sustain performance of all of these tasks
all of the time. Intermediate High speakers can narrate and describe in all major time
frames using connected discourse of paragraph length, but not all the time. Typically,
when Intermediate High speakers attempt to perform Advanced-level tasks, their
speech exhibits one or more features of breakdown, such as the failure to carry out
fully the narration or description in the appropriate major time frame, an inability to
maintain paragraph-length discourse, or a reduction in breadth and appropriateness
of vocabulary.
Intermediate Mid speakers tend to function reactively, for example, by responding
to direct questions or requests for information. However, they are capable of asking
a variety of questions when necessary to obtain simple information to satisfy basic
needs, such as directions, prices, and services. When called on to perform functions or
handle topics at the Advanced level, they provide some information but have difficulty
linking ideas, manipulating time and aspect, and using communicative strategies, such
as circumlocution.
Intermediate Mid speakers are able to express personal meaning by creating with the
language, in part by combining and recombining known elements and conversational
input to produce responses typically consisting of sentences and strings of sentences.
Their speech may contain pauses, reformulations, and self-corrections as they search
for adequate vocabulary and appropriate language forms to express themselves.
In spite of the limitations in their vocabulary and/or pronunciation and/or grammar
and/or syntax, Intermediate Mid speakers are generally understood by sympathetic
interlocutors accustomed to dealing with non-natives.
Intermediate Low
Speakers at the Intermediate Low sublevel are able to handle successfully a limited
number of uncomplicated communicative tasks by creating with the language in
straightforward social situations. Conversation is restricted to some of the concrete
exchanges and predictable topics necessary for survival in the target-language culture.
These topics relate to basic personal information; for example, self and family, some
daily activities and personal preferences, and some immediate needs, such as ordering
food and making simple purchases. At the Intermediate Low sublevel, speakers are
primarily reactive and struggle toanswer direct questions or requests for information.
They are also able to ask a few appropriate questions. Intermediate Low speakers
manage to sustain the functions of the Intermediate level, although just barely.
NOVICE
Novice-level speakers can communicate short messages on highly predictable, everyday topics that
affect them directly. They do so primarily through the use of isolated words and phrases that have
been encountered, memorized, and recalled. Novice-level speakers may be difficult to understand
even by the most sympathetic interlocutors accustomed to non-native speech.
Novice High
Speakers at the Novice High sublevel are able to handle a variety of tasks pertaining
to the Intermediate level, but are unable to sustain performance at that level. They
are able to manage successfully a number of uncomplicated communicative tasks in
straightforward social situations. Conversation is restricted to a few of the predict
able topics necessary for survival in the target language culture, such as basic
personal information, basic objects, and a limited number of activities, preferences,
and immediate needs. Novice High speakers respond to simple, direct questions or
requests for information. They are also able to ask a few formulaic questions.
Novice High speakers are able to express personal meaning by relying heavily on
learned phrases or recombinations of these and what they hear from their interlocutor.
Their language consists primarily of short and sometimes incomplete sentences
in the present, and may be hesitant or inaccurate. On the other hand, since their
language often consists of expansions of learned material and stock phrases, they
may sometimes sound surprisingly fluent and accurate.Pronunciation, vocabulary, and
syntax may be strongly influenced by the first language. Frequent misunderstandings
may arise but, with repetition or rephrasing, Novice High speakers can generally be
understood by sympathetic interlocutors used to non-natives. When called on to
handle a variety of topics and perform functions pertaining to the Intermediate level,
a Novice High speaker can sometimes respond in intelligible sentences, but will not be
able to sustain sentence-level discourse.
Novice Low
Speakers at the Novice Low sublevel have no real functional ability and, because of
their pronunciation, may be unintelligible. Given adequate time and familiar cues, they
may be able to exchange greetings, give their identity, and name a number of familiar
objects from their immediate environment. They are unable to perform functions or
handle topics pertaining to the Intermediate level, and cannot, therefore, participate in
a true conversational exchange.
WWW.ACTFL.ORG