New Drilling Technologies: Politecnico Di Torino

POLITECNICO DI TORINO
DIPARTIMENTO DI AMBIENTE E TERRITORIO

CORSO DI LAUREA IN
PETROLEUM ENGINEERING
New drilling technologies

Applications of nanotechnology in drilling operations
Student: Mohamed Afya

Supervisor: Prof. Ing. Raffaele Romagnoli
TORINO
ACCADIMIC YEAR 2019/2010
OCTTOBER 2020
1
Table of contents
1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….………4
2. Nanotechnology applications in drilling fluids……………………………………….……9
2.1. Main functions of drilling fluids………………………………….……..….…………….9
2.2. Drilling fluid types and selection criteria……………………………………………..11
2.3. Drilling fluid characteristics……………………………………………….……….….…..12
2.4. Conventional drilling fluid additives……………………….……………….……….…13
2.5. Conventional drilling fluids limitations……………………………………………….14
2.6. Nano based drilling fluids applications……………………………………………….17
2.7. Nano drilling fluid additives……………………………………….………………………22
3. Nanotechnology applications in well cementing…………………………….………..26
3.1. Well cementing definitions and main functions…………………………………26
3.2. Cement API classes ………………………………………………………………..…………26
3.3. Cement properties ……………………………………………………………………………28
3.4. Conventional cement additives ………………………………………………………..29
3.5. Nano technology applications …………………………………………………………..33
4. Nanotechnology other drilling applications and challenges……………….…….39

4.1. Nanotechnology drilling bits applications………………………………………….39
4.2. Nanotechnology LWD applications……………..…………………………………….40
4.3. Nanotechnology field applications and challenges…………………….........41
5. Conclusions………………………….…………………………………………..………….………….44
6. References………………………………………………………………………………….…………..46
2
List of figures
Figure.1: Nanotechnology oil and gas applications Number of publications
per year …………………………………………………………………………………..…5
Figure.2: Increasing the surface area with nanoparticles ….……………....………7
Figure.3: Surface area to volume ratio of the same volume of materials …..7
Figure.4: Percentage of the conducted investigations of nanoparticles in
the oil and gas industry …………………………….……………………….…..……8
Figure.5: Effect of temperature and pressure on the rheology of a conventional
invert fluid …………………………………………………………………………………..15
Figure.6: Differential Sticking against permeable formation ……..…….……….17

Figure.7: Solid content Comparison of bentonite based and nano based
drilling fluids……..……………………………………………………………….….……20
Figure.8: Promising nanoparticle applications in drilling fluids……………………..….24
Figure.9: Effect of nanoparticles in decreasing fluid loss of cement slurry…36
List of tables
Table.1: Summary of application of nanoparticles for drilling fluids.…………25
Table.2: Summary of application of nanoparticles for well cementing………38
3
Abstract
During the last decade much attention has been drawn to the innovation and
applications of nanotechnology in different drilling aspects, which is reflected through
the huge amount of funds invested on the research and development and the
increasing number of publications each year with respect to the nanotechnology
applications. the aim of this work is to perform a comprehensive review for the
applications of nanotechnology as key solution to overcome drilling challenges and
makes drilling operations more efficient, less problematic and cost effective. It is
summarizing different successful nanotechnology applications including drilling fluid
applications, well cementing applications, drill bits and MWD and LWD applications.
and the main challenges associated with the use of nanoparticles, that could be
helpful for further researches.
1. Introduction
Oil and gas have been the primary source of energy over hundreds of years historically
and for the time being, although more attention is being paid to alternative,
sustainable sources of energy, the Oil and Gas Industry is still playing a vital rule to
meet the world’s energy requirements in different life sectors. with the continuous
increase of oil and gas demand and continuous decrease of production of the readily
exploitable resources due to oilfields maturity. oil and gas industry will face greater
technical challenges in the coming decades. the need to explore more hydrocarbon
reserves would require drilling more wells in unconventional and deep formations,
harsh or remote locations and the developing of challenging reservoirs that previously
were not economic to produce. that means more exploration expenses associated
with more difficult and problematic drilling and production operations.
As the hydrocarbon exploration and extraction activities moves further deep in the
earth crust the drilling challenges and associated risks prevails with complex drilling
hazards that are not usually encountered in onshore and shallow drilling operations
4
So the industry needs technological innovations to enhance and optimize the drilling
operations to successfully meet the energy challenge. only a small amount of success
has been achieved in solving these problems by use of conventional macro and micro
materials.[1]
Nanotechnology is a General-Purpose Technology (GPT) that can fulfill the needs of
humanity in every industry sector, it has had a revolutionary impact in many
industries, from healthcare to aeronautics, With the increased attention toward
nanotechnology and their innovative use for different industries, the application of
nanotechnology in the oil and gas industry is a subject undergoing intense study by
major oil companies, which is reflected through the huge amount of funds invested
on the research and development, with respect to the nanotechnology.
Nanotechnology has been recently investigated extensively for different applications
in the oil and gas industry such as drilling fluids and enhanced oil recovery in addition
to other applications including cementing and well stimulation.[2], [3]
With this great attention for the application of nanotechnology in oil and gas
industry, which is obvious from the increasing number of publications concerning
this subject each year during the last decade. (Fig. 1), it is necessary to review and
summarize the available application and the work that has been done up to date.
5
Fig. 1: Nanotechnology oil and gas applications Number of publications per year
This work concentrates on the nanotechnology applications in oil and gas drilling
operations, a comprehensive literature review was conducted for the applications of
nanotechnology in different drilling operations including drilling fluid applications,
well cementing applications, drilling bits, MWD and LWD applications. And
summarizing all nanoparticles that have been used and their rule in overcoming
drilling problems through improving targeted parameters along with the associated
challenges for nanotechnology applications.
But,
Before we go through the applications of nanotechnology. it’s important to know what

the nanotechnology is? and what makes nanoparticles more efficient than macro or
even microparticles?
Nanoparticles are substances with dimensions in the order of 1–100 nm (nm). Over
years, many researches proved that the transition from micro scale particles to nano
scale particles will bring about a revolution in many industries. the wide applications
of nanoparticles resulted in a new field of technology that deals with the design,
characterization, production and application of materials and devices based
on nanometer scale. Which is the nanotechnology [5].
Nanoparticles possess unique magnetic, electrical, thermal and optical properties due
to their small size and greater surface area per unit volume (Fig. 2), they show a higher
magnitude of reactivity or interaction with other molecules, higher adsorption
potential and higher heat conductivity.
Fig. 3 shows a comparison of the surface area to volume ratio of spherical particles of
the same material with radius of 1 mm (mm), 1 μm, and 1 nm, It is clearly indicating
that more than a millionfold increase in surface area per unit volume will be obtained
by converting a particle from a millimeter scale to nano-sized particles[6].
6
Fig.2: Increasing the surface area with nanoparticles.
Fig. 3: Surface area to volume ratio of the same volume of materials.
Materials that have nanoparticles embedded in their structures are termed

nanomaterials. Most of the qualities of the nanoparticles are inherited by these
materials, and that explains the enhancement in their properties. The nanoparticles
are knitted into the structure of materials and bring about reinforcement. In
conventional materials, the atoms are located in the interior of the particles; but, for
a typical nanomaterial, most of the atoms are located on the surface of the particles.
Reactions that produce superb chemical, optical, mechanical, electrical, thermal,
magnetic properties etc., occur in nanomaterials [7]. These properties attract great
attention for the applications of nanotechnology to overcome challenges encountered
during different drilling operations in deep and unconventional environment where
macro and micro materials fail to fulfil the required functions.
7
Fig.4 shows the percentage of the conducted investigations of nanoparticles across
the oil and gas industry, as we can see from the chart more than 50% of
nanotechnology applications in the oil and gas industry related to drilling operations
"drilling fluid and well cementing applications".[8] Now will go through deep
investigation for nanotechnology application in different drilling operations.
Fig. 4: Percentage of the conducted investigations of nanoparticles in the oil and gas industry
8
2: Nanotechnology applications in drilling fluids.
A drilling fluid is defined as a pre- designed fluid which is circulated through a well in
order to perform certain functions which can be achieved through the suitable choice
of mud type and continuous maintenance of the mud properties using the right
additives [10].
The drilling fluids are critical in the oil and gas drilling operations. To reach the target
formations in the well, the drilling fluid program should be designed carefully to safely
drill the well with economical wise. Drilling fluids cost is considered to share a portion
of around 25–40% of the total drilling operations cost [11]. Some problems that occur
during the drilling operations such as mud losses will add more cost to the total drilling
cost. Several factors affect the ratio of the drilling fluid cost to the total drilling cost,
such as well location, drilled formation type, and other technical problems that might
be encountered during the drilling operations [12]. Un properly designed drilling fluid
often contributes to the failure of the drilling operations Thus, it is essential to
condition drilling fluid properties in accordance with the wellbore environment.[13]
2.1 Main functions for drilling fluids:

The drilling fluids should be properly synthesized to perform efficiently during the
drilling operation and modifiable according to the formation to be drilled. The drilling
fluid performs a number of functions, these functions are: [14]
1-Hole cleaning:
The most basic function of drilling fluid is to transfer cuttings to surface. To achieve
this function, the fluid should have adequate suspension properties to help ensure
that cuttings and commercially added solids, such as barite weighing material, do not
settle during static intervals.
2- Prevent well-control issues
Under normal drilling conditions the hydrostatic pressure exerted by column of drilling
fluid on the wellbore must exceed the natural formation pressure by maintaining safe
margin to help prevent the influx of formation fluids into wellbore “kicks” or
“blowouts.” But if the density of the fluid becomes too heavy, the formation can break
down causing drilling loss into the resultant fractures, a reduction of hydrostatic
pressure occurs that leads to pressure reduction and influx of formation fluids into the
9
well. Therefore, maintaining appropriate fluid density for the wellbore pressure
regime is critical to safety and wellbore stability.
3- Preserve wellbore stability
Maintaining the optimal drilling-fluid density not only helps contain formation
pressures, but also helps prevent hole collapse and shale destabilization. The wellbore
should be free of obstructions and tight spots, so that the drill string can be moved
freely in and out of the hole (tripping).
4- Cool and lubricate the bit and drill string

Drilling action requires mechanical energy in form of weight on bit, rotation and
hydraulic energy. A large part of energy dissipated as heat that must be removed to
allow drilling. The circulation of drilling fluid through the drill string and up the
wellbore annular space helps reduce friction and cool the drill string.
5- Minimize formation damage

The invasion of drilling fluid filtrate with fine solids and chemicals contained in the
drilling fluid into the producing formations can cause formation damage, this damage
can be minimized with careful fluid design based on tests performed on cored samples
from the formation of interest.
6- Provide information about the wellbore

Because drilling fluid is in contact with the wellbore, it reveals substantial information
about the formations being drilled, and serves as a conduit for much data collected
downhole by tools located on the drill string and through wireline-logging operations
performed when the drill string is out of the hole. An optimized drilling-fluid can
enhance the quality of the data transmitted by downhole measurement and logging
tools as well as by wireline tools.
7-Minimize risk to personnel, the environment, and drilling equipment

Drilling fluids require daily testing, and continuous monitoring by specially trained
personnel. The safety hazards associated with handling of any type of fluid are clearly
indicated in the fluid’s documentation. Drilling fluids also are closely scrutinized by
worldwide regulatory agencies to help ensure that the formulations in use comply
10
with regulations established to protect both natural and human communities where
drilling takes place.
2.2 Drilling fluid types and selection criteria

Drilling fluids can be classified into four types base fluids. all types are used in variable
situations and with different additives. Galal, M. [15] stated that the correctly selected
and engineered drilling fluid plays a significant role in delivering a high quality
wellbore. This only can be achieved by an appropriately designed drilling fluid that
must be tailored to satisfy many diverse parameters. The four drilling fluid types are
[16]:
1- Water based mud.

2- Oil base fluids.
3- Synthetic base fluids.
4- Pneumatic or Compressible Fluids.
Previous research on drilling mud concludes that oil-based mud is the best drilling fluid
but is not recommended because it is unsustainable and environmentally unfriendly.
Water-based drilling fluids account for 80% of the total drilling operation carried out
due to their environment friendly nature and they are highly cost effective as
compared to the synthetic or oil-based drilling fluids. Therefore, research has been
conducted on additives that can be used for water-based mud, making it equal or even
superior in quality to oil-based mud. Since the drilling operations are carried out at
higher costs so the selection of the drilling fluid should be made carefully considering
all the following factors:
1. The location and the type of formation which is to be drilled.

2. The variation in the pressure and temperature of the wellbore.
3. The nature of the formation fluids i.e. strength, porosity and permeability.
4. Production factors, environmental factors and safety are the other important
factors which are also considered while making the selection of the drilling
fluids.[17]
11
2.3 Drilling fluid characteristics
Once the type of drilling fluid is selected using the above considerations, the drilling
fluid characteristics should be designed. These characteristics could be listed as
follows [18]:
1. Drilling Fluid Density or Mud weight:

Mud weight or mass per unit volume depend on solids in the liquid either in solution
or suspended. It increases by adding solid materials and decreased by adding water
or oil or aerating the liquid. Mud weight is measured by mud balance and expressed
in ppg, pcf or kg/m3.
2. Rheological properties:
Mud Rheological properties include plastic viscosity, yield point and gel
strength.
2.1. Plastic Viscosity (PV):
Plastic viscosity of the drilling fluid controls the magnitude of shear stress
develops as one layer of fluid slides over another. It measures the friction
between layers and provides a scale of the fluid thickness. Plastic viscosity
decreases with increasing temperature. Plastic viscosity and yield point are
measured by Viscometer.
2.2. Yield point:
Yield point is a measure of the attractive forces between particles due to positive
and negative charges. It measures the forces causes mud to gel in case of
motionless. It shows a minimum level of stress must be provided before mud flow
and is expressed in lb/100ft2.
2.3. Gel strength:
Gel strength is the ability of mud to develop gel structure. It defines the ability of
mud to held solids and measure thixotropy it is measured by using viscometer and
is expressed in lb/100 ft2.
3. Fluid Filtration Properties:

Drilling fluid loss against porous and permeable rock is called filter loss occurs when
mud pressure is higher than formation pressure causing the formation of a layer of
solids deposited on the rock is described as filter cake. The quantity of mud loss
12
depends on volume of filtrate and thickness and strength of filter cake. Ideal mud
gives small filter loss and thin and tough mud cake and differential pressure. It is
measured by using filter press.
4. Chemical Properties:
PH of mud describes the acidity or alkalinity of the mud. It is measured by pH meter
or strips. pH value Plays a major role in controlling calcium stability. A minimum value
of 7 should be maintained to control corrosion.
2.4 Conventional drilling fluid additives
The drilling fluid characteristics should be properly synthesized to perform efficiently

during the drilling operation and modifiable according to the formation to be drilled
through adding different additives to the base fluid. That are used to develop the key
properties of the drilling fluids. These additives can be classified as [19]:
1) Reactive Solids are added to provide viscosity and yield strength.
2) Inert Solids include low gravity and high gravity are added to adjust mud
weight.
3) Chemical Additives divided into thinners and thickeners are used to control
mud properties.
The most common types of additives used in water base and oil base muds are [20]:
1. Weighting Materials, such as (Barite, Illmenite, Calcium Carbonate, and

Siderite).
2. Viscosifiers, such as (CMC, HEC, Xanthan gum).
3. Filtration Control Materials (PAC and CMC).
4. Rheology Control Materials (Thinners).
5. Alkalinity and pH Control Materials (NaOH, KOH, Ca (OH)2, NaHCO3 and
Mg(OH)2).
6. Lost Circulation Control Materials (Flakes (mica and cellophane), Granular
(nutshells, calcium carbonate and salt), and Fibrous (glass fiber, wood fiber and
animal fiber).
13
7. Lubricating Materials (oil (diesel, mineral, animal, or vegetable oils),
surfactants, graphite, asphalt, gilsonite, polymer and glass beads.
8. Shale Stabilizing Materials (high molecular weight polymers, hydrocarbons,
potassium and calcium salts (e.g. KCl) and glycols).[21]
2.5. Conventional drilling fluid limitations
As the hydrocarbons exploration and extraction activities moves further deep down
the Earth’s crust, the challenges and risks involved prevails associated with complex
drilling hazards usually not encountered in onshore and shallow drilling. That makes
great challenges for conventional drilling fluids and resulted in may drilling problems
can be summarized as follows:[22]
1. High Pressure - High Temperature (HPHT) Environment.
As the depth of drilling increased, more severe drilling conditions are expected where
deep wells are mostly associated with HPHT environment which may exceed
temperature of 600°F (315°C) and pressure as high as 40,000 psi [23]. In a HPHT
environment the ability of drilling equipment, tools and materials to perform
optimally is jeopardized that will affect the efficiency of the drilling. More critically,
the efficiency of the drilling fluid properties will be severely impacted due to the
extreme temperature and pressure where the rheological properties of the drilling
fluid especially the polymer-based additives which will degrade under high
temperature. When drilling fluids destabilize, it will cause various drilling, logging and
completion issues which may eventually lead to kicks or even blowout. With
conventional invert emulsion fluids, the major challenges encountered under HPHT
environment are related to the thermal degradation of emulsifiers and fluid-loss
reducer that can lead to gelation and loss of rheological properties that can cause
weighting material sagging, and other associated well control problems. Fig-2 shows
the effect of HTHP on the rheology of a conventional invert emulsion fluids. The
highlighted area shows the impact on rheology after 60 minutes at temperatures
above 400°F (204°C) [24]
14
Fig.5. Effect of temperature and pressure on the rheology of a conventional invert fluid.
2. Well Formation Instability

The instability of the well formation is another major challenge need to be faced in
deep well drilling operations. Formation instability such as caving, sloughing and
collapsing are some of the examples frequently faced especially while drilling through
shale formations. They happen mostly due to the hydration of the shale formations or
by formation geo-mechanical failure due to the in-situ formation pressure anomalies.
In many deep well cases, both factors co-exist and effective simultaneously, hence,
may cause the shale formation to swell and cause geo-mechanical failures. These may
result in the slough of the shale formation which may lead to other drilling problems
(stuck pipe and etc). The hydration of the formation caused by fluid invasion, can
generally be minimized by the formulation of a proper fluid chemistry – adding
appropriate additives (shale hydration inhibitors) such as bentonite into the drilling
fluid. Hence, it is important to have a robust drilling fluid with the ability to prevent
excessive fluid invasion into the formation while strengthening the mechanical
strength of the formation.
3. Narrow Drilling Tolerance Window (DTW)

The hydrostatic pressure exerted by the drilling fluid in normal drilling conditions must
be higher than the pressure of the formation to avoid kicks and / or blowouts but also
15
must be lower than the fracture pressure of the formation. DTW is the range or
difference between pore pressure and fracture gradient where the drilling operations
can safely operate in without the risk of kicks or blowout. drilling in conditions of wide
DTW provides a certain extent of safety and flexibility for formulating drilling fluid
suitable for different pressure zones. But when DTW becomes narrower, especially in
deep well environment, the formulation of drilling fluid to cater for the different
pressure zones becomes trickier. Narrow DTW environment increases the complexity
of the drilling activities.
4. Fluid Circulation Loss:
Typical overbalance drilling conditions cause invasion for drilling fluid filtrates and
associated drilling fluids into the formation to a particular extent especially in the
highly porous and permeable zones and naturally fractured zones. Fluid circulation
loss may lead to well control issues and may even results in potential kicks and
blowouts which will bring adverse impacts to the environment and personnel. To
minimize the fluid loss with conventional drilling fluids plugging materials such as
bentonite to perform mud cakes to avoid fluid loss. But too thick mud cake, it impedes
the movement of the drill strings; making it stuck. This is often called differential
sticking.
5. Differential Sticking
Differential sticking occurs when the drill string is “sucked” up against the formation
due to the pressure difference between the wellbore and the formation. This normally
occurs at permeable zones where the mud cake is formed (Fig.6). Thick mud-cake may
increase the possibility of differential sticking during drilling operations. Hence, it is
vital that the mud cake formed by the drilling fluid is kept at a minimum thickness
while maintaining its effectiveness in preventing or minimizing fluid loss.
16
Fig.6: Differential Sticking against permeable formation
2.6 Nano based drilling fluids applications:
There are different limitations that are faced when designing drilling fluids using
conventional additives such as the temperature and the additives particle size
limitations. Therefore, nanoparticles were investigated extensively to study their
applicability in overcoming these limitations.
Nanotechnology-based drilling products have demonstrated their unique
characteristics such as huge surface area, high thermal conductivity, and pollution
resistance. Nanomaterials are expected to show excellent fluid properties with very
low concentration in fluid systems. They are regarded as the most promising materials
to develop highly efficient and economic new generation of smart drilling fluids.
This generation of drilling fluids must possess enhanced rheological properties to form
high-quality mud cake, improve the wellbore stability, provide advantages like
wettability alteration, advanced drag reduction and sand consolidation along with
superior thermal and filtration control properties and high anti-pollution power that
meet complicated requirements during drilling. Hence, Nano-base drilling fluid is
recommended in the application of current and future high-temperature high-
pressure (HTHP) drilling operations, unconventional drilling conditions, and deep-
water drilling operations. The use of Nano-base drilling fluid in such drilling conditions
results in:
17
1. Increasing drilling fluid stability in HPHT Environment
The stability of additives in HPHT conditions is often the determinant for the drilling
fluids to be able to fulfill the expected functional tasks as temperature above 200°C
and downhole pressure of 20,000 psi and above are very common in deep water wells.
In fact, when temperature exceeds 400°F (204°C), the stable additive options are
almost nonexistent for both water based and non-aqueous based fluids [25]. The
extremely high surface area to volume ratio of nanoparticles leads to a more effective
interaction between the nanoparticles surfaces with external and internal rock
surfaces and enhance the thermal conductivity of nano-fluids, which in turn enhances
the efficiency of the cooling system. Hence, the nanoparticles, with their excellent
thermal conductivity are deemed to be the most suitable materials of choice for
application in such environment [26].
Experimental study on OBM with nanomaterials added as replacement of the
conventional polymer-based additives and the fluid formulation was subjected to high
temperature (175°C) aging for up to 96 hours. The rheological properties measured
showed that the nano-fluid formulation maintained the desirable properties after
aging and exposure to high temperature [27].
2. Controlling Fluid Circulation Loss & Minimizing Formation Damage

The prevention of circulation and filtrate loss by current drilling fluid with
conventional lost circulation materials showed limited success. However, due to the
extremely small size of the nanoparticles, they can provide effective sealing effect in
the porous and permeable zones, fractured and cavernous formations. Nanoparticles
can access the smallest pores and pore throats in the matrix and act as sealing agents
in all lithology types including even shales.[28]
3. Increasing wellbore stability & overcoming NDW challenges

Previous experience and drilling data reveal that various drilling problems arise while
drilling unconsolidated formations using the conventional macro or even micro-
material-based drilling fluid. These fluid formulations are often not able to prevent
sanding, hole collapse, washout, fracturing problems due to their inability to generate
18
effective inter-particle cohesion and cementation to strengthen near wellbore
formation. Due to the ultra-fine size, nanomaterials are able to access the pores and
the inter-granular contact surfaces of the unconsolidated sand particles. Hence,
nanomaterials with gluing and cementing properties are expected to form bonded
networks of particles within the formation matrix creating an integrated ring of rock
mass around the wellbore wall [26].
4. Minimizing differential Sticking possibilities

Since the presence of thick mud cake may increase the likelihood of differential
sticking during drilling operations, it is important to produce a thin and low sticking
mud cake on the wellbore wall in preventing pipe sticking problems [26]. Nanofluids
has proven to possess the ability to produce thin, non-erodible, impermeable mud
cake that are effective in preventing fluid loss. In addition, nano-fluids would be able
to reduce the adhesive tendency of mud cake by forming another thin non-adhesive
nano-film on the drill pipe surface. This would help to decrease the likelihood of stuck
pipe to occur. Due to the extremely small particle size, the nanoparticles added into
the formulation of nano-fluids can easily enter the pipe-mud cake interface to form
an effective lubricating film, isolate the mud cakes or even destroy the mud cake for
an effective de-bonding of the pipe from the mud cake surface. This demonstrates the
potential of nanomaterials application in the formulation of both drilling and spotting
fluids to address the pipe sticking problems. Therefore, in curbing the stuck pipe
problems, [29].
5. Reducing torque and drag problems and increases rate of penetration

The application of nanoparticles in the drilling fluid would be able to form a continuous
layer of a very thin film on the surface of wellbore surfaces, mud cake and even on the
surface of the drill pipes. This characteristic of nano-fluids would be able to provide
enough lubricating features, minimize the frictional resistance between the drill pipes
and the wellbore surfaces, minimize the torque and drag problems and hence improve
the overall ROP.
On the other side solid contents of in the drilling fluid is one of the factors that reduces
the ROP. Hence, it is important to keep the amount of solid contents in the fluid at a
19
minimum required level [30]. Due to high surface area to volume ratio of nanoparticles
less solid content is required to achieve certain derailing fluid characteristics in case
of using nano based drilling compared to conventional drilling fluid as indicated by
excremental results in Fig.8 [64]. The unweighted nano-based drilling fluid could be
the ideal candidate to drill hard rock formations to enhance the rate of penetration.
Fig.7 Solid content Comparison of bentonite based and nano based drilling fluids
6. Minimizing bit balling problems:

The progressive sticking and accumulation of shale on the bit tooth gaps and the tooth
surfaces can turn the drill bit into a ball-like structure which would drastically reduce
the ROP and the drilling efficiencies [31]. This could lead to a significant increase in
the total drilling cost should the operations need to be stopped to clean or change the
drill bit. Hence, nano-fluid formulation containing a combination of inhibitive and
hydrophobic film forming nanomaterials can eliminate and minimize the bit balling
problems and could potentially lead to cost saving measures.
7. Decreasing the environmental impact of drilling fluids:

The use of nanoparticles decreases the environmental impact of drilling fluids due to
decease of the required amount of additives to achieve certain drilling fluid properties
compare to conventional additives (typically less than 1% concentration) in the fluid
formulation. Hence, nano-fluids could be the fluid of choice in conducting drilling
operations in sensitive environments [22].
20
8. Removal of Toxic Gases:
Hydrogen sulfide is a very dangerous, toxic and corrosive gas. It can diffuse into drilling
fluid from formations during drilling of gas and oil wells. Hydrogen sulfide should be
removed from the mud to reduce the environmental pollution, protect the health of
drilling workers and prevent corrosion of pipelines and equipment. Sayyadnejad et al.,
2008 [32], used 14-25 nm zinc oxide particles size and 44-56 m2/g specific surface area
to remove hydrogen sulfide from water-based drilling fluid according to the following
chemical reaction.
(ZnO + H2S → ZnS + H2O)
The efficiency of these nanoparticles in the removal of hydrogen sulfide from drilling
mud was evaluated and compared with that of bulk zinc oxide. Their results
demonstrated that synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles are completely able to
remove hydrogen sulfide from water-based drilling mud in about 15 min., whereas
bulk zinc oxide is able to remove 2.5% of hydrogen sulfide in as long as 90 min. under
the same operating conditions.[33]
9. Increase down hole tools life:
The down hole tools and equipment are always exposed to abrasive forces due to high
kinetic energy associated with the particles present naturally in the subsurface
formations and the drill solids added to the drilling fluid system for specific functions.
These forces cause the wear and the tear for most of the down hole equipment,
especially in deviated and horizontal wells where the tools are more exposed to these
abrasive forces.
Because of their extremely small size, nanoparticles are preferred to be used in drilling
fluid design as their abrasive forces are negligible with less kinetic energy impact. In
addition to all advantages of using nanoparticle in mud design, it is safer than
conventional mud from the point of environmental view. The nanoparticles are added
to mud in small amount, with low concentration about 1%. So, Nano-based drilling
fluids could be the fluid of choice in conducting drilling operations in sensitive
environments to protect other natural resources [30].
21
10. Preventing of flushing drill
Drilling mud containing nanoparticles because of their ability to form a hydrophobic
film on the head of drill and sustainable levels are able to fully prevent of flushing drill
and sustainable levels [33].
2.7. Nano drilling fluid additives

Due to the small size of nanoparticles, is preferred to be used them in drilling mud.
Because of the friction forces of these nanoparticles is negligible and have lower
motor power efficiency. Moreover, from an environmental standpoint, the use of
nanoparticles in drilling mud is better than conventional additives. Because
nanoparticles at low amounts and low concentrations are added as a percent [33]. In
this section a few examples of nano-additives to be expressed along with their effects
for improving drilling fluid properties:[28]
1. Nano metal oxide
Nanoparticles of metal oxides are one type of nanoparticles that widely used as drilling
mud additives Nanoparticles to improving the mechanical and rheological properties
of drilling mud, preventing of mixing mud and shale, reducing the permeability of the
filter cake , reducing fluid loss, maintaining mud properties at High temperature-High
pressure, improving the electrical properties of mud, increasing the wellbore stability
and also is used as a lubricant.
2. Nano zinc oxide
Adding zinc oxide nanoparticles in drilling mud causes that during a chemical reaction,
all of the hydrogen sulfide gas, which is highly toxic and corrosive gas and have a
negative and harmful effects on drilling process, removed of mud. The use of these
nanoparticles improved the mechanical and rheological properties of drilling mud,
reducing the permeability of the filter cake, increasing well bore stability and reducing
fluid loss in condition of High Pressure-High temperature.
3. Nano-iron oxide (III)

The use of nano-iron oxide (III) as add to mud torque and drag forces is reduced. The
high-pressure high temperature conditions also nano additives used to reduce fluid
loss. Add this nanoparticle to enhance sustainability goals wells, mechanical and
rheological properties of drilling mud and filter cake permeability is also reduced.
22
4. Nano Silica
Nano silica of the most widely used in the drilling mud. Silica nanoparticles can have
different effects on drilling mud such as reducing fluid loss, improving the stability of
the well (to reduce formation damage), as well as maintaining high-temperature
properties of drilling mud under high pressure.
5. Carbon nanostructure
Another nano additive that most widely used in drilling mud is carbon nanostructures.
These nanostructures applied to improve the heat transfer coefficient, rheological
properties and muds sustainability, improve the electrical properties of mud, increase
fluid weight, reduce fluid loss, reduce corrosion of drilling equipment and protection
of rheological properties of drilling mud at high temperature [34]. In following are two
common types of carbon nanostructures is introduced:
5.1. Graphene
Graphene is a type of nanostructures that is used in drilling mud for reducing
fluid loss, increasing the stability of wells, reducing torque and drag,
improving electrical properties and improving dielectric constant of drilling
mud, improving the rheological properties of the fluid and increasing the
stability of drilling mud [33,34].
5.2. Carbon nanotubes
By adding carbon nanotubes to drilling mud meanwhile, reduce fluid loss, can
control the weight of the mud. Moreover, can be used of these
nanostructures in drilling mud in high-pressure high temperature condition.
Other benefit of these nanotubes is including increase the stability of wells,
reduce of flushing drill and decrease the torque and drag forces can be
mentioned [33,34].
6. Nano-Iron hydroxide
Iron hydroxide nanoparticles can be used to drilling mud for reducing fluid loss and
increasing the stability of the well.
7. Nano Emulsions
Nano emulsions are used in drilling mud to reducing fluid loss, decreasing formation
torque and drag forces [35].
23
8. Nano Polymers
Different kinds of nano polymers for improving the rheological properties of drilling
mud is used in drilling mud. In other words, nano-polymers are one of the most widely
nano structures that used in drilling mud. Some of these nano polymers are including
poly methyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate and nano-cellulose fibers
[33,35].
9. Boehmite nanoparticles
Boehmite a stable quasi phases of aluminum oxide by simultaneously links of
Hydroxide and oxide. Boehmite with hydroxyl functional groups of active and
functional nanostructures in the surface. The use of Boehmite nanoparticles reduces
fluid loss. Quality of mud cake that created by the combination of Boehmite
nanoparticles and biopolymer is better and thinner than the quality of mud cake that
produced by polymer [36].
A summary of Promising nanoparticle applications in drilling fluids is shown in Fig.8
[77] and table.1 summarizes the recent researches and investigations for the
applications of different nanoparticles to improve the drilling fluid parameters [4].
Fig.8 Promising nanoparticle applications in drilling fluids
24
Table.1 Summary of application of nanoparticles for drilling fluids.
Investigated NP Improved parameters References
Aluminum oxide Improving rheological properties Alsaba et al. (2018)

Copper oxide Improving filtration characteristics
Magnesium oxide
Copper oxide Plug nanopores in shale Kumar et al. (2018)

Improving hole stability
CNT–polymer nanocomposite Improving rheological properties Hafiz et al. (2018)

Improving wellbore stability
Improving filtration characteristics for HPHT drilling application
Iron oxide Improving filtration characteristics Mahmoud et al. (2018)
Iron oxide Improving lubricity of drilling fluids Alvi et al. (2018)

Improving filtration characteristics
Iron oxide Improving filtration characteristics at high temperature Barry et al. (2015)
Multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) Improving heat transfer Hassani et al. (2016)
Zinc oxide Improving rheological properties
Silicon dioxide
Multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) Improving lubricity of drilling fluids Ismail et al. (2016)
Silicon dioxide Improving rheological properties
Nanoclay Improving filtration characteristics Vipulanandan et al. (2018b)

Reducing electrical resistivity
Nanoclay Improving rheological properties for synthetic-based drilling fluids Pan et al. (2018)
Reducing electrical resistivity
Nanopolymer Improving filtration characteristics Xu et al. (2013)

Wellbore strengthening application
Non-modified silica nanoparticles Improving sealing of pores Wang et al. (2018)

Sulfonated nanoparticles Improving wellbore stability for shale formation
Silicon dioxide Improving rheological properties Gbadamosi et al. (2018)

Improving hole cleaning
Silicon dioxide Improving shale inhibition Yang et al. (2017)

Mitigating pore pressure transmission
Improving wellbore stability
Titanium oxide Improving rheological properties Parizad et al. (2018)

Improving thermal and electrical conductivity
Titanium oxide Improving rheological properties Minakov et al. (2018)

Silicon dioxide Improve hole cleaning
Aluminum oxide
Zinc titanate Improving rheological properties Perween et al. (2018)

Improving thermal stability
25
3: Nanotechnology applications in well cementing.
3.1 Well cementing definition and main functions

Oil well cementing is the process of placing cement slurry to fill the annulus space
between the casing and the formation (Nelson and Guillot, 2006). The economic
longevity of a producing oil and gas well is directly linked to the quality of the
cementing job, and without complete isolation in the wellbore, the well may never
reach its full production potential (Nelson and Guillot, 2006). [37] The main Functions
of cement can be summarized as follows [38,39]:
1. Provision of mechanical support of the casing string.

2. Provide zonal isolation of the formations which have been penetrated by the
wellbore.
3. Prevent corrosion of the casing by formation fluids.
4. Support of the well-bore walls to prevent collapse of formations
5. Cement job is also used to close an abandoned portion of the well.
6. Confines abnormal pore pressure and increases the possibility to hit the target.
3.2. Cement API classes:
According to drilled formation depth, bottom hole pressure and temperature and
drilling conditions such as the presence of gases and corrosive fluids there are nine
API classes of cement:[40]
Class A
• Depth surface – 6000 ft (1830 m).
• No special properties.
• Similar to ASTM C 150,Type I.
Class B
• Moderate to high sulphate resistance.
• Similar to ASTM C 150 Types II.
Class C
• High early strength.
26
• Similar to ASTM C 150 Types III.
Class D
• Depth from 6000 ft – 10,000 ft (1830 m – 3050 m).
• Moderate and high sulphate resistance.
• Moderately high pressure and temperature.
Class E
• Depth from 10,000 ft – 14,000 ft (3050 m – 4270 m).
• Moderate and high sulphate resistance.
• High pressure and temperature.
Class F
• Depth from 10,000 ft – 16,000 ft (3050 m – 4270 m).
• Extremely high pressure and temperature.
Class G
• Depth surface – 8000 ft (2440 m), as basic cement, fine.
• Can be used with accelerators and retarders for other specifications.
• No addition other than calcium sulphate or water.
Class H
• Depth surface – 8000 ft (2440 m), as basic cement, course.
• No addition other than calcium sulphate or water
Class J
• Depth 12,000 – 16,000 ft (3660 m – 4880 m).
• Extremely high pressure and temperature.
• No addition other than calcium sulphate or water.
27
3.3. Cement properties
The cement must possess certain properties in order to fulfil the prementioned
functions, these cement properties can be summarized as follows: [41]
1. Slurry density:
Slurry density should be the same as mud to minimize the risk or blowouts or
lost circulation. It’s measured using mud balance. Low density are prepared
with bentonite, pozzolan, gilsonite, perlite, Diatomacous earth. Density
increases by adding barite, iron ores or galena.
2. Thickening Time:
Thickening Time determine the length of time the slurry can be pumped. It is
the time necessary for the slurry consistency to reach 100 poises under
stimulated bottom hole pressure and temperature, Measured using cement
consistometer, In practice the thickening time should be at least 25% higher
than the time necessary to accomplish the cement job.
3. Cement Strength:
Cement in oil wells is subjected to static and dynamic stresses. Static stress due
to dead weight of pipe; compressive stresses due to the action of fluid and
formations. Dynamic stresses resulting from drilling operation, especially the
vibration of drill string. To withstand these stresses a compressive strength of
500 psi after 24 hours period is needed.
4. Filtration:
Water loss of neat cement is very high, Laboratory tests show that up to 50%
of mixing water is lost by filtration through rock or filter papers. Presence of
small thickness mud cake reduces filtration. High density slurry results in
higher filtration loss.
5. Permeability:
Naturally permeability of set cement should be the lowest possible. Bentonite
cements are known to be very permeable (values up to 10 md are reported,
28
while special cements (latex cement) have permeabilities as low as one
micodarcy. The following factors influence the permeability of the set cement:
• Water/cement ratios: High W/C ratio increases the permeability
• Downhole conditions: high pressure and confinement due to their
compacting effects decrease the permeability of set cement.
6. Perforating Qualities:
Ordinary cements, when they are completely hardened, fracture excessively
when perforated. Low strength cements are usually less brittle and have less
tendency to shatter upon perforating. Shattering of cement is not a desired
quality when near an O.W.C. or O.G.C.
7. Corrosion Resistance:
Set cement could be penetrated by corrosive liquids especially those
containing CO3 or SO4 irons. Cement corrosion decreases the final
compressive strength render the cement more permeable. Reduction of the
hardening time improves the cement resistance to corrosion by corrosive
fluids.
8. Bond Requirements:
For clean surfaces (rock or metal) the bond increases with time and moderate
temperatures. Mud cake and dirty casing surfaces reduce markedly the bond
between casing or rock and cement. Additives such as salt and fine sand
increases the bond between casing and the set cement.
3.4. Conventional cement Additives.
The rate at which hydration occurs when water is mixed with cement can be altered
using chemical additives. Additives are chemicals and materials blended into base
cement slurries to change the performance of the cement. Due to the inherent nature
of base cements and because of the demands placed on the cement sheath
throughout the life of the well, the performance properties of the cementing slurry
are modified to address the specific and unique conditions of each well. Many of the
additives currently used are organic, polymeric materials which have been specifically
29
formulated for use in well cementing operations. Typical chemical additives for oil and
as well cementing operations can be divided into eight categories [42]:
1. Accelerators
Accelerator is a chemical additive used to speed up the normal rate of
reaction between cement and water which shortens the thickening
time of the cement, increase the early strength of cement, and saves expensive
rig time. Cement slurries used in shallow wells where temperatures are low
requires accelerators to shorten the time for “Waiting-on-Cement (WOC)”
before drilling operation can be resumed [43]. In deeper wells the higher
temperatures promote the setting process, and accelerators may not be
necessary. Accelerators do not increase the ultimate compressive strength of
cement but promote rapid strength development [44]. Calcium Chloride and
Sodium Chloride are the most commonly used cement accelerators. However,
Calcium Chloride (CaCl2) is undoubtedly the most efficient and economical
accelerator [45]. Other types of accelerators include, Sodium Metasilicate,
Potassium Chloride and gypsum].
2. Retarders
Retarders are chemical additives used to decrease the speed of
cement hydration [46]. The cements commonly used in well
applications do not have a sufficient Long fluid life (thickening time) for use at
Bottom Hole Circulating Temperatures (BHCTs) above 100 °F (38°C) [47]. For
extending the thickening time, additives known as retarders are required.
Retarders inhibit hydration and delay setting, allowing sufficient time for slurry
placement in deep and hot well. That is, it increases the thickening times for
pumping the cement into place [20,21].
Retarders do not decrease the ultimate compressive strength of cement butg
do slow the rate of strength development [47]. Besides extending the

pumping time of cements, most retarders affect the viscosity to some
30
degree. The most common retarders are natural lignosulfonates, cellulose and
sugars derivatives [47,43].
3. Extenders:
Many formations will not support long cement columns of high density
slurries, these slurries weights need to be reduced to protect formations
that have low fracture gradient or for economics purposes. To reduce the
weight of cement slurries, extenders are used [50]. Extenders are also
known as water adsorbing or lightweight inert materials [51]. They are
broad class of materials that are used for reducing slurry density and
increasing the yield of cement slurry. A reduction of slurry density reduces
the hydrostatic pressure during cementing of weak and fragile formations
or depleted reservoirs [51]. This helps prevent the breakdown of weak
formation and loss circulation [52]. Extenders also reduce the amount of
cement needed for cementing operation and because they are less expensive
than cement, they bring considerable savings. These additives change the
thickening times, compressive strengths and water loss. In reducing slurry
density, the ultimate compressive strength is reduced and the thickening
time is increased [53]. Bentonite and Sodium Silicate are the most commonly
used chemical extenders for cement slurries.
4. Heavy Weight Agents:
The main purpose of heavy weight additives is to restrain high formation
pressures. They have specific gravity greater than the cement, consistent
particle size distribution and low water requirement. Chemically weighting
agents are inert in the cement slurry and do not interfere with logging tools
[54]. When high pore pressures, unstable wellbores, and
deformable/plastic formations are encountered, high weight muds of over
18 ppg may be used and correspondingly cement slurries of equal weight
must be used. The most obvious way of increasing cement density is to

reduce the amount of water in the cement slurry. However, slurries with
31
densities greater than 17.5 lb/gal would be too thick to mix and pump
without weighting agents. This would therefore require dispersants to
maintain pumpability. When weights higher than 17.5 lb/gal are required,
materials with high specific gravities are added. To Lake and Mitchell [55],
heavy weight agents are normally required at densities greater than 17
lb/gal where dispersants or silica is no longer effective. The most common
weighting agents are Hematite, Ilmenite and Barite.
5. Fluid Loss Additives (FLA):
Fluid loss additive is also known as permeability plugging additive. Fluid loss
additives are commonly employed in field cementing operations reduce
the rate at which water from cement is forced into permeable formations
when a positive differential pressure exits into the permeable formation.
That is, it prevents dehydration of cement slurry. In the presence of
differential pressure, filtrate loss to permeable strata can dramatically alter
the physical properties of oilwell cements. Thickening time, rheology, and
mud displacement efficiency are all impacted by the changes in the water-
cement (w/c) ratio brought on by the loss of cement filtrate. According
to Adams and Charrier [44] cellulose derivatives are the most common fluid
loss additives.
6. Lost Circulation Additives:
Lost circulation additive is also known as macro plugging materials. Lost-
circulation additives are used to plug zones that have a tendency to draw in
fluid because they are unconsolidated or weak. Large particulates can be
placed in the cement slurry to prevent fracturing or to bridge existing
fractures. These particles should have a broad particle size distribution,
should not accelerate or retard excessively, should have sufficient strength
to keep a fracture bridged, and should be inexpensive and non-toxic. Common
lost circulation additives are Gilsonite, Fibrous and flake materials.
32
7. Expansion Additives:
Expansion additives cause the exterior dimensions of set cement to grow
slowly when the cement is in the presence of down-hole fluids. This minor
growth of the exterior dimensions of the slurry causes the cement to bond
better to pipe and formation. The most common additives for this use are
based on calcium sulphoaluminate and calcium oxide [56].
8. Dispersants:
Dispersants also known as friction reducing additives are added to improve
upon the flow properties of cement slurry [53]. In particular, they are used to
offset overly-high viscosity and some slurries tendency. The most common
dispersant is the sodium salt of Polynapthalene Sulfonate (PNS)
9. Antifoam Agents:
Many additives cause foaming problems, but if slurry foams excessively,
during mixing, centrifugal pump will air lock, and mixing must be stopped
[52]. Therefore antifoams are introduced in cement slurries to decrease
foaming and minimise air entrainment during mixing. Excessive foaming
can also result in an underestimation of the density downhole and cavitation
of the mixing system. The cheapest and the most commonly used antifoam
agents are Polypropylene glycols, [55] but Polyethylene glycols are also
used.
3.5. Nanotechnology well cement applications
With the expansion of oil and gas exploration and development towards deep strata
and new fields, drilling and completion engineering is confronted with cementing
problems under complex geologic conditions and operating conditions involving
HTHP, salt gypsum formations/brine formations, sour gas reservoirs, long cemented
sections, where conventional cement additives failed to provide the required
properties to achieve zonal isolation. Several studies addressed the use of
33
nanoparticles in oil well cementing to enhance cement properties and to be used as
cement spacer.
1. Enhancing Cement Properties:

Due to the very high surface area of nanomaterials, they can be used in oil well
cementing to accelerate the cement hydration process, increase compressive
strength, help control fluid loss, reduce probability of casing collapse and prevent the
gas migration which is one of the cementing problems in gas wells. Moreover, they
are often required in small quantities. Experimental results showed that
nanotechnology succeeded to enhance cement properties in challenging conditions
such as [33,57]:
- Extensive low temperature:

In the oil and gas cement system, it is crucial for a cement sheath to maintain
the long-term integrity of the wells. The temperature condition is an important
factor of the oil cement system. Excessive low temperatures can result in the
extension of delay time and increase the cost of the project. Pang investigated
nano silicas as additives for low temperature conditions. It was observed that
the use of nano silicas increased cement hydration without a decrease for a
long time. To reduce the particle size and increase the aspect ratios, both
contribute to the nano silica performance. Nano silica also shows superior
compatibility with calcium chloride [58].
- HPHT conditions:
The HPHT condition is another problem. An experiment conducted by Murtaza
et al. concluded that nanoclay enhanced oil cement slurry. The enhanced
cement had compressive strength and rheological properties under conditions
of the API standard [59].
- Bulk shrinkage:
Bulk shrinkage is a big problem of oil cement applications in wells, which leads
to the loss of long-term zonal isolation. Because of the nanostructure and
34
hydration reactivity, MgO NPs show expansive properties for the cement
system. An investigation by Jafariesfad et al. showed that MgO NPs
significantly improved the expansion of cement and prevented bulk shrinkage.
They also found that the addition of MgO NPs significantly reduced the setting
time compared with the original system [60].
- Fluid loss problems:

The use of nanoparticles decreases the fluid loss of the cement slurry. In Fig -
7 [63] the liquid loss from the oil-well cement with varying contents of
nanoparticles was tested, and the temperature range was between 70 and 90
C. As the Figure indicates, the loss of fluid from the slurries decreased gradually
with the accruing dosage of the nanoparticles. The highest rate of the cement
to trap its water was obtained at 3% nano silica concentration compared to 4
% concentration in case of using nano titanium and nano Aluminum oxides was
employed. In general, at all observed temperatures, the nanoparticles showed
useful results, and the filtration loss of the slurry was below 100 mL which is
generally considered to be adequate for most primary cementing operations.
Compared to the control samples, the slurry containing NS particles reduced
the loss of fluid by 70–72%, while the specimens containing NT and NA
powders reduced the loss by 61–63% and 57–60% respectively.
35
-
Fig-9 Effect of nanoparticles in decreasing fluid loss of cement slurry [63]
2. Nano-emulsions for cement spacers
Depending on the task, it is necessary to displace one fluid system with another during
drilling activities; hence, spacers are usually placed in between fluid systems during
the displacement operation. Oil based mud (OBM) needs to be removed by spacers
when displacing cement or completion fluid to avoid contamination [61].
36
Nano-emulsions are emulsions where the droplet size of the internal phase is in the
nanoscale (<500 nm). Due to their small dimensions they have a high surface area and
show very different properties. Maserati et al., 2010 [62] proposed that solvent in
water nano-emulsions used as cement spacer formulation could allow optimizing the
cleaning of the casing during the cement job with a high improvement of the
performances of the spacers currently in use. Maserati et al., 2010, studied the
formulation of direct nano-emulsions (O/W), with a selected solvent as internal phase,
in order to improve the casing – open hole cleaning and reverse the surfaces
wettability to allow better adhesion of slurry between casing and hole. Using this
methodology, based on high efficiency system with reduced chemical dosage, can also
result in a considerable optimization of product cost of effective cement operation
[33].
A summary of the wide range of investigated nanoparticles and their effects on

cement properties is presented in Table 2 [4].
37
Table.2 Summary of application of nanoparticles for well cementing.
Investigated NP Improved parameters References
Aluminum oxide Increasing the electrical resistivity Vipulanandan et al. (2018a)

Enhancing the compressive strength
Aluminum oxide Accelerating the setting time Deshpande and Patil (2017)
Improving mechanical properties
Aluminum oxide Improving mechanical properties Nazari and Riahi (2011)
Graphene nanoplatelets Improving mechanical properties Alkhamis and Imqam (2018)

(GNP) Reducing chemical shrinkage
Graphene nanoplatelets Improving mechanical properties Peyvandi et al. (2017)

(GNP)
Iron oxide Improve sensing properties Vipulanandan et al. (2015)

Magnesium oxide Accelerating the setting time Jafariesfad et al. (2016)

Reducing chemical shrinkage
MWNTs Accelerating the setting time Santra et al. (2012)

Aluminum oxide
Silicon dioxide
Nanosynthetic graphite Improving the early compressive Ahmed et al. (2018)

strength development
Silicon dioxide Accelerating the setting time Patil and Deshpande (2012)
Improving the filtration characteristic
Silicon dioxide Accelerating the setting time Pang et al. (2014)

Silicon dioxide Improving mechanical properties Li et al. (2004)

Iron oxide Improve sensing properties
Silicon dioxide Improving mechanical properties Jalal et al. (2012)
Silicon dioxide Improving mechanical properties Shih et al. (2006)
38
4: Nanotechnology other drilling applications and challenges.
Although the applications of nano technology in drilling fluids and well cementing are
the main applications in drilling operations which counts for 58% from the nano
technology applications in oil and gas industry as seen in Fig.4 there are many other
applications for nano technology related to drilling operations such as nano
technology applications in drilling bits and measurements and logging while drilling.
4.1 Nano technology drilling bits applications:

A drill bit has been used to drill through the rock of the earth’s surface to where the
oil and gas deposits lie. Drill bits are broadly classified into two main types according
to their primary cutting mechanism [65]:
1. Rolling cutter bits drill largely by fracturing or crushing the formation with
"tooth"-shaped cutting elements on two or more cone-shaped elements that
roll across the face of the borehole as the bit is rotated.
2. Fixed cutter bits employ a set of blades with very hard cutting elements, to
remove material by scraping or grinding action as the bit. The most common
type in use today is the polycrystalline diamond cutter (PDC) bits.
Now adays over 80% of the footage drilled for oil and gas production is done using
PDC Bits. This has been made possible by advances in PDC. They are now capable of
drilling the hardest and toughest formations, more economically and effectively than
any other technology. Only ~20% of the footage drilled uses the older roller-cone and
impregnated bit technologies.
Despite such widespread use, conventional PDC has several major drawbacks,
including low thermal stability (failure at temperatures above 350°C) and low impact
strength. The resulting blunting and shattering of drill bits greatly slows the drilling
process. One attempt to improve upon conventional PDC has been the development
of thermally stable polycrystalline (TSP) diamond composites using silicon carbide
(SiC) binders. These composites are stable up to 1,200°C, but have reduced fracture
toughness (6–8 MPa·m1/2) due to the brittleness of the SiC and diamond.
39
Nano diamond PDC Technology:
Carbon nanomaterials are extremely interesting because of their unique combination
of mechanical, structural, electrical and thermal properties. In case of challenging
drilling operations, harsher conditions are met and the need for effective drilling bits
increases. Nano diamond particles have been functionalized for polycrystalline
diamond applications such as polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutters for drill
bits. They give PDC cutters unique surface characteristics that allow them to integrate
homogeneously into PDC synthesis. Chakraborty[66], studied the functionalization of
nano diamond, integration into the PDC matrix and subsequent property
enhancement in comparison to the base PDC matrix. The performance of PDC cutters
produced, the behaviors and proposed mechanisms are still an area of interest [33].
4.2 Logging-while-drilling (LWD) applications:

It is a normal practice to collect information about the lithology, reservoir fluid and
rock properties, etc. during the drilling stage or at other stages during the life of a well.
The process of this information gathering is called logging. The idea of nanotechnology
if applied in any of the technological fields will put LWD and MWD as outdated
technology and can prove to be a boon for the next technical revolution.
4.2.1 Nanorobots MWD and LWD applications:

Nanorobotics involves the design of robots that have dimensions in the micrometer
range, but equipped with components of nanometer sizes. However, the conceived
nanorobots will have sizes in the order of centimeters. They gave strong arguments to
support the possibility of nanorobots rendering measurements-while-drilling (MWD)
and logging-while-drilling (LWD) technologies outdated. Since nanorobots are very
small, compared to conventional logging tools, they can get very close and deep into
the formation; thereby, promoting the acquisition of more accurate real time drilling
and formation parameters. The nanorobots could be used for logging purpose by
circulating these nanorobots, which have nanomotors being driven by the ions in the
mud or by mud circulation system. Expensive wireline tools are conventionally used
in all types of wells to find important formation properties. Nanorobots can eliminate
use of these tools, entirely and small particles of order of nano meter can be put in
the drilling mud to obtain useful information. These robots equipped with nano
40
sensors could be used to measure various properties of formation, borehole
environment, mud properties and many more. Nanorobots can be constructed in a
manner so that they possess sensors, on-board driving mechanism and
microcomputer as well as interface mechanism from where it can send instructions to
microcomputers from surface computers. Transmission to surface is by means of
electromagnetic waves and detected by means of probes on surface. They facilitate
wire-less communication and real time surveillance. Thus, in comparison to the
conventional logging they can save rig hours and can be more accurate and precise as
compared to presently used techniques like logging while drilling and measurement
while drilling. They can move with circulating mud or they can be made to propel or
stop by the on-board computer instructions depending upon the measurement to be
taken. They will also be able to invade the formation and get important petrophysical
parameters [67].
4.2.2 Li-6 scintillation nanostructured glass-ceramics LWD applications:

Almost all available neutron porosity logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools use He-3
detectors to detect neutrons down hole due to their mechanical robustness and the
absence of the limitations to operate at high temperatures. Unfortunately, the lack of
sufficient quantities of the He-3 isotope caused by the depletion of its stockpile
accumulated during the Cold War makes this material unavailable to well logging
industry for the next 3 to 5 years. Among all other available neutron detection
technologies, only Li-6 scintillation detectors do not have limitations on neutron
detection efficiency that would prevent them from consideration for LWD
applications. The key component of Li-6 scintillation detector is the scintillation
material containing Li-6 isotope. To be used as detectors for neutron porosity LWD
tools based on pulsed neutron generators (PNG), such material should be able to
operate at high temperature and enable large neutron detector constructions. Nikitin
and Korjik [68], presented new Li-6 scintillation nanostructured glass-ceramics that
perform substantially better than all available Li-6 scintillation materials. It is this
performance improvement provided by nanostructured nature of obtained material
which enables its use in the neutron detectors of PNG-based neutron porosity LWD
tools.
41
4.3 Nanotechnology field applications and challenges:
The different applications of nano technology in drilling operations have been
proposed based on laboratory experimental work. And most of results reported in
literature showed that the drilling industry can reap huge benefits from the
nanotechnology applications in different drilling operations. Despite the growing
number of investigations with respect to the high potential of using nanoparticles a
very limited field trials have been reported.
More field trials are recommended for further advancement of nanotechnology in this
industry. The reason behind the lack of field applications of nano technologies despite
the fact that a good number of major oil services companies investing a lot in terms of
research with respect to nanotechnology is due to the presence of several challenges
associated with these applications such as [69]:
1. High cost of nano particles:

Almost all studies have been performed in laboratories with small quantities
of nano particles. Different application requires different type of nano particles
with specific surface, electrical, mechanical, magnetic, optical, chemical and
thermal properties. These highly customized NPs are not only expensive but
also challenging to produce in bulk for field application. There are many studies
on different ways of synthesizing nano particles, but simple and low-cost
method has yet to exist due to the higher embodied energy required to
produce nanomaterials per unit mass compared to bulk materials [70].
Moreover, the efficiency of nano particles is highly dependent on their size,
shape or surface properties a precise control in manufacturing them is also
imperative. Unless and until a cost-effective manufacturing of NPs is realized,
nanotechnology application in the industry will remain restricted.
2. Stability of nano particles in liquid carrier fluid:

Due to their surface charge NPs are tending to aggregate. This agglomeration
becomes aggressive in extreme conditions such as high salinity and high
temperature [71]. The addition of Viscosifiers can increase NPs stability [3] Also
surface modification or coating can help minimize these problems. However,
42
this would reduce or even eliminate special properties of NPs such as catalytic
property, magnetism, sensing ability, affinity to rock or fluid etc. [72].
3. Transportation of nano particles into the formation:

The lack of general understanding of migration behavior of NPs in porous
medium is another difficulty requiring extensive theoretical modelling and
core samples work to investigate the transport and retention properties of
nanoparticles in subsurface formation [73].
4. Nano particles environmental impact:

Although the use of nanoparticles reduces the environmental impact as they
are used in much less concentrations compared to conventional particles the
impact of nanoparticles on health, environment, and safety, they can be very
hazardous and might lead to severe health issues [74- 75] since they have
higher potential of being inhaled or absorbed through skin due to their unique
properties of nanoparticles in terms of size and surface area to volume ratio.
As a result, standards, regulations, recommended practices, and working
guidance are being developed by regulatory agencies such as local and
international Environmental Protection Agencies (EPA), International
Standardization Organization (ISO), American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) to minimize or prevent any unwanted health and
environmental associated risks when handling nanoparticles[75].
43
5. Conclusions
1. The extensive review over the recent investigations of nanoparticles within the
oil and gas industry has shown that nanotechnology has recently emerged as
an attractive topic of research related to drilling operations in different aspects
including drilling fluids, well cementing, drilling bits and Logging while drilling
and many studies have shown very promising results in terms of their
performance and effectiveness.
2. The promising results are due to the distinctive properties of nanoparticles.
As they have significantly different mechanical, chemical, thermal, and
magnetic properties compared to their macroscopic counterparts. Due to the
large surface-to-volume ratio and huge particle number in one-unit mass This
enables their ability to solve problems that the conventional methods cannot
address.
3. The nano based drilling fluids show higher stability and better rheological and
filtration characteristics that enable them to overcome drilling challenges in
HPHT and narrow drilling window environments, Increase wellbore stability,
minimize differential Sticking possibilities, reduce torque and drag problems,
minimize formation damage, increase rate of penetration and decrease the
environmental impact of drilling fluids.
4. Most of the investigated nanoparticles resulted in enhancing the mechanical

properties of cement as well as providing a better control for the set time.
44
5. The most widely investigated nanoparticles that showed significant
improvement for the different applications across drilling operations was
found to be the nano silica. Which suggests it’s high potential in being applied
in the field.
6. Despite a large number of laboratory-scale investigations published in the

literature, a very few filed trials were performed with promising results due to
some challenges such as their economic feasibility and their impact on HSE.
7. Based on the challenges discussed, more research should be conducted in

order to reduce the cost of producing nanoparticles. And mitigate health and
environmental risks related to nano particles handling and More field trails are
highly recommended for better evaluation of the technology.
45
6. References
[1] Kong X, Ohadi M. Applications of micro and nano technologies in the oil and gas
industry – overview of the recent progress. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum
Exhibition and Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2010.
[2] Muili Feyisitan Fakoya, Subhash Nandlal Shah, Emergence of nanotechnology in

the oil and gas industry: Emphasis on the application of silica nanoparticles,
March.2017.
[3] Amanullah M, AlArfaj MK, Al-Abdullatif ZA. Preliminary test results of nano-based
drilling fluids for oil and gas field application. In SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and
Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
[4] Mortadha T. Alsaba, Mohammed F. Al Dushaishi · Ahmed K. Abbas.

A comprehensive review of nanoparticles applications in the oil and gas industry.
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology., January 2020.
[5] I. Evdokimov, N. Eliseev, A. Losev, M. Novikov, Emerging petroleum oriented

nanotechnologies for reservoir engineering, SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical
Conference and Exhibition, 2006.
[6] Md. Amanullah, A.M Al-Tahini, Nano-Technology - its significance in

smart fluid development for oil and gas field application, SPE Saudi Arabia
Section Technical Symposium. 2009.
[7] M. Wilson, K. Kannangara, G. Smith, M. Simmons, B. Raguse Nanotechnology
Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida (2002)
[8] Mortadha T. Alsaba, Mohammed F. Al Dushaishi · Ahmed K. Abbas.

A comprehensive review of nanoparticles applications in the oil and gas industry.
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology., January 2020.
[9] Chilingarian, G.V.; Alp, E.; Al-Salem, M.; Uslu, S.; Gonzales, S.; Dorovi, R.J. Drilling
fluid evaluation using yield point-plastic viscosity correlation. Energy Sources 1983,
8, 233–244.
[10] Khodja, M., Khodja-Saber, M., Canselier, J. P., Cohaut, N. and Bergaya, F.:
“Drilling Fluid Technology: Performances and Environmental Considerations,”
46
Products and Services; from R and D to Final Solutions, Igor Fuerstner (Ed.), ISBN:
978-953-307-211-1, InTech, 2010.
[11] Jenkins, P.B.; Crockford, A.L. Drilling Costs. In Proceedings of the SPE European
Spring Meeting, London, UK, 14–15 April 1975.
[12] Okoro, E.E.; Dosunmu, A.; Iyuke, S.E. Data on Cost analysis of drilling mud
displacement during drilling operation. Data Brief 2018, 19, 535–541.
[13] Hany Gamal , Salaheldin Elkatatny , Salem Basfar and Abdulaziz Al-Majed, Effect
of pH on Rheological and Filtration Properties of Water-Based Drilling Fluid Based on
Bentonite, November 2019.
[14] Functions of drilling fluid, petrowiki.org.
[15] Galal, M.:“ Can We Visualize Drilling Fluid Performance before We Start?,” Paper
SPE 81415 presented at the SPE 13th Middle East Oil Show and Conference held in
Bahrain, 5-8 April 2003.
[16] A. A. Elgibalya , M. S. Farahata , M. M. Abd El Nabbib .The Optimum Types and

Characteristics of Drilling Fluids Used During Drilling in The Egyption Westren Desert,
Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering.
[17] Medhi S, Chowdhury S, Gupta DK1 and Mehrotra, Nanotechnology: An Emerging

Drilling Fluid Solution, Oil & Gas Research.
[18] API RP 13D: Recommended Practice on the Rheology and Hydraulics of Oil-well
Drilling Fluids, 6th Edition, May 2010.
[19] http://www.eng.cu.edu.eg/users/aelsayed/Mud%20engineering.pdf.
[20] Hussain Rabia. 2001. Well Engineering and Construction. Entrac Consulting,
ISBN-10: 0954108701.
[21] Adel M. Salem Ragab, Innovative Drilling Fluid Design Using Nano Materials.
MOC.2016.
[22] A R Ismail, A R A Hakim and M N A M Norddin, Potential of Nano-Fluid

Application in Deep Well Drilling Operation Challenges
[23] Agarwal S, Tran P, Soong Y, Martello D and Gupta R K 2011 Flow Behavior of
Nanoparticle Stabilized Drilling Fluids and Effect of High Temperature Aging AADE
National Technical Conference and Exhibition Houston, Texas.
[24] Stefano G D, Stamatakis E, Young S 2013 Development and Application of Ultra-

HPHT Drilling Fluids 11th Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition
Ravenna, Italy.
47
[25] Hoelscher K P, Young S, Friedheim J and Stefano G D 2013 Nanotechnology
Application in Drilling Fluid 11th Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition
Ravenna, Italy.
[26] Amanullah M and Richard B 2006 Experimental Evaluation of the Formation

Strengthening Potential of a Novel Gel System IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling
Technology Conference Bangkok, Thailand.
[27] Agarwal S, Walker L M, Prieve D C, Soong, P Y and Gupta R K 2009 Using

Nanoparticles and Nanofluids to Tailor Transport Properties of Drilling Fluids for
HTHP Operations AADENational Technical Conference & Exhibition New Orleans,
Louisiana.
[28] Pantea PAYDAR, Mojtaba AHMADI, Characteristics of water-based drilling mud

containing Gilsonite with Boehmite nanoparticles.
[29] Paiaman A M and Al-Anazi B D 2008 Using Nanoparticles to Decrease

Differential Pipe Sticking and Its Feasibility in Iranian Oil Fields Oil & Gas Business
Sharif University of Technology.
[30] Amanullah M, Al-Arfaj M K and Al-Abdullatif Z 2011 Preliminary Test Results of

Nano-based Drilling Fluids for Oil and Gas Field Application SPE/IADC Drilling
Conference and Exhibition Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[31] Amanullah M and Al-Tahini A M 2009 Nano-Technology- Its Significance in Smart

Fluid Development for Oil and Gas Field Application SPE Saudi Arabia Section
Technical Symposium and Exhibition AlKhobar, Saudi Arabia.
[32] M. A. Sayyadnejad, H. R. Ghaffarian, M. Saeidi, Removal of hydrogen sulfide by

zinc oxide nanoparticles in drilling fluid, International journal of Environmental
Science and Technology, September 2008
[33] Abdelrahman Ibrahim El-Diasty, Adel M. Salem Ragab, Applications of

Nanotechnology in the Oil & Gas Industry: Latest Trends Worldwide & Future
Challenges in Egypt.
[34] H,Rezaee., M, Javadi., M,Afshaepour," Introduction to produce nano-materials,

properties and applications",2013.
[35] A,Nasiri., M, Valizadeh.," Partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide efficiency in water-

based drilling fluids", Journal of Polymer Science and Technology,page3-13,2013.
[36] Jayanth T. Srivatsa, Malgorzata B. Ziaja, Texas Tech University in Lubbock, 2012,
“An Experimental Investigation on Use of Nanoparticles as Fluid Loss Additives in a
48
Surfactant - Polymer Based Drilling Fluids”, International Petroleum Technology
Conference, 14952-MS.
[37] Narjes Jafariesfad1, Mette Rica Geiker2, Yi Gong2, Pål Skalle1, Zhiliang Zhang2,
Jianying He., Cement Sheath Modification Using Nanomaterials for Long-term Zonal
Isolation of Oil Wells: Review.
[38] Akshar Thakkar, Aakash Raval, Shishir Chandra, Manan Shah∗, Anirbid Sircar, A
comprehensive review of the application of nano-silica in oil well
Cementing.
[39] R.S. Rudi Rubiandini, New additive for improving shearbond strength in high
temperature and pressure cement, IADC/SPE Asia Pac. Drill. Technol. (2000).
[40] Oil Well Cementing Functions, Classes and Equipment, AONG website.
[41] http://www.eng.cu.edu.eg/users/aelsayed/Cementing.pdf.
[42] Eric Broni-Bediako1, Ogbonna F. Joel2 and Grace Ofori-Sarpong, Oil Well
Cement Additives: A Review of the Common.
[43] Rike JL (1973) Obtaining Successful Squeeze Cement Result Society of
Petroleum Engineers SPE 4608.
[44] Adams N, Charrier T (1985) Drilling Engineering: A Complete Well Planning
Approach Penn Well Publishing Company. Tulsa Oklahoma USA 297-303.
[45] Davis EL (1938) Specifications for Oil Well Cement Pacific Coast District
Division of Production. Los Angeles 372-376.
[46]. Satiyawira B, Fathaddin MT, Setiawan R (2010) “Effects of Lignosulfonate
and Temperature on Compressive Strength of Cement”. Proceedings World
Geothermal Congress , Bali, Indonesia 1-3.
[47] Joel OF (2009) The Secondary Effects of Ligno sulfonate Cement Retarder on
Cement Slurry Properties. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 4: 1-7.
[48]. Huwel J, Faustino V, Roberts R (2014) Crest Pumping Technologies Cement
Compressive Strength Development Drastically Affected by Testing Procedure.
Proceedings of American Association of Drilling Engineers Fluid Conference and
Exhibition Houston Texas 1-5.
[49]. Kutasov IM, Eppelbaum LV (2014) Temperature Regime of Boreholes:
Cementing of Production Liners Proceedings of Thirty-Ninth Workshop on
Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford. University Stanford California 1-5.
49
[50] Samsuri A, Junin R, Osman AM (2001) The utilization of Malaysian Local
Bentonite as an Extender and Free water Controller in Oil-Well Cement
Technology. Society of Petroleum Engineers Jakarta Indonesia 1-5.
[51] Shadizadeh SR, Kholghi M, Kassaei MH (2010) Experimental Investigation of
Silica Fume as a Cement Extender for Liner Cementing in Iranian Oil/Gas Wells.
Iranian Journal of Chemical Engineering 7: 42-66.
[52] Nguyen JP (1996) Oil and Gas Field Development Techniques Institut Francais du
Petrole Editions. Techno Paris Francis 187-192.
[53] Anon (2009) Drilling Engineering Lecture Notes on Cementing Institute of
Petroleum Engineering. Herriot Watt University 1-40.
[55] Lake LW, Mitchell RF (2006) Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Drilling
Engineering, Society of Petroleum Engineers 2: 395-410.
[56] Anon (2014) Well Engineering Shell Intensive Training Programme 1-46.
[57] Zhang Zhe and An Yuxiu, Nanotechnology for the oil and gas industry – an
overview of recent progress.
[58] Pang X, Boul PJ, Cuello Jimenez W. Nanosilicas as accelerators in oilwell
cementing at low temperatures. SPE Drill. Complet. 2014, 29, 98–105.
[59] Murtaza M, Rahman MK, Al-Majed AA. Effect of nanoclay on mechanical and
rheological properties of oil well cement slurry under HPHT environment. In
International Petroleum Technology Conference, International Petroleum
Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 2016.
[60] Jafariesfad N, Geiker MR, Skalle P. Nanosized magnesium oxide with engineered
expansive property for enhanced cement-system performance. SPE J. 2017, 22,
1681–1689.
[61] R. Van Zanten, D. Ezzat, Surfactant nanotechnology offers new method for
removing oil-based mud residue to achieve fast, effective wellbore cleaning and
remediation, SPE International Symposium and Exhibiton on Formation Damage
Control, 2010.
[62] G. Maserati, E. Daturi, L. Del Gaudio, A. Belloni, S. Bolzoni, W. Lazzari, G.Leo,

Nano-emulsions as cement spacer improve the cleaning of casing bore during
cementing operations, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2010.
[63] Mtaki Thomas Maagi , Samwel Daud Lupyana and Jun Gu, Effect of Nano‑SiO2,
Nano‑TiO2 and Nano‑Al2O3 Addition on Fluid Loss in Oil‑Well Cement Slurry ,
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2019.
[64] Md Amanullah, M.K. Al-Arfaj, Z. Al-Abdullatif, Preliminary test results of nano-based

drilling fluids for oil and gas field application, January 2011.
50
[65] M. Yahiaouia, L. Gerbaudb, J-Y. Parisa, J. Denapea, A. Dourfayec. A STUDY ON
PDC DRILL BITS QUALITY, 2013.
[66] Chakraborty, S., Agrawal, G., DiGiovanni, A., & Scott, D. E. 2012. The Trick Is The
Surface - Functionalized Nanodiamond PDC Technology. Society of Petroleum
Engineers.
[67] P. Singh, S. Bhat, Nanologging: use of nanorobots for logging, SPE Eastern
Regional Meeting, 2006.
[68] Anton Nikitin, Mikhail Korjik, An Impact of Nanotechnology on the Next

Generation of Neutron Porosity LWD Tools, SPE-157024-MS, 2012.
[69] Fakoya MF, Patel H and Shah SN, Nanotechnology: Innovative Applications in
the Oil & Gas Industry, International Journal of Global Advanced Materials &
Nanotechnology.
[70] Kim HC, Fthenakis V (2012) Life Cycle energy and climate change implications of
nanotechnologies. J Ind Ecol 17(4):528–541.
[71] Khalil M, Jan BM, Chong Wen CW, Berawi MA (2017), Advanced nanomaterials
in oil and gas industry: Design, application and challenges. Applied Energy 191: 287-
310.
[72] H.-C. Kim, G. Dubois, Nanostructured Silica and Silica-derived Materials, Dekker
Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Six Volume Set (Print Version),
second ed., 2008, pp. 3063e3071.
[73] J. Yu, J. Berlin, W. Lu, L. Zhang, A. Kan, P. Zhang, et al, Transport study of
nanoparticles for oilfield application, SPE International Conference on Oilfield Scale,
2010.
[74] Hoelscher K P, Young S, Friedheim J and Stefano G D 2013 Nanotechnology

Application in Drilling Fluid 11th Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition
Ravenna, Italy.
[75] Nabhani N, Tofighi A (2010) The assessment of health, safety and environmental
risks of nanoparticles and how to control their impacts. In: SPE international
conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and
production, 12–14 April, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
[76] Lau HC, Yu M, Nguyen QP (2017) Nanotechnology for oilfield applications:

challenges and impact. J Pet Sci Eng 157:1160–1169.
[77] Peter J. Boul and Pulickel M. Ajayan, Nanotechnology Research and

Development in Upstream Oil and Gas
51

New Drilling Technologies: Politecnico Di Torino

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Drilling Technologies: Politecnico Di Torino

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Drilling Technologies: Politecnico Di Torino

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

POLITECNICO DI TORINO

DIPARTIMENTO DI AMBIENTE E TERRITORIO

New drilling technologies

Student: Mohamed Afya

4. Nanotechnology other drilling applications and challenges……………….…….39

Figure.6: Differential Sticking against permeable formation ……..…….……….17

Nanotechnology is a General-Purpose Technology (GPT) that can fulfill the needs of

humanity in every industry sector, it has had a revolutionary impact in many

industries, from healthcare to aeronautics, With the increased attention toward

on the research and development, with respect to the nanotechnology.

Nanotechnology has been recently investigated extensively for different applications

to other applications including cementing and well stimulation.[2], [3]

industry, which is obvious from the increasing number of publications concerning

Before we go through the applications of nanotechnology. it’s important to know what

Fig. 3: Surface area to volume ratio of the same volume of materials.

Materials that have nanoparticles embedded in their structures are termed

2.1 Main functions for drilling fluids:

4- Cool and lubricate the bit and drill string

5- Minimize formation damage

6- Provide information about the wellbore

7-Minimize risk to personnel, the environment, and drilling equipment

2.2 Drilling fluid types and selection criteria

1- Water based mud.

1. The location and the type of formation which is to be drilled.

1. Drilling Fluid Density or Mud weight:

3. Fluid Filtration Properties:

2.4 Conventional drilling fluid additives

The drilling fluid characteristics should be properly synthesized to perform efficiently

1. Weighting Materials, such as (Barite, Illmenite, Calcium Carbonate, and

2.5. Conventional drilling fluid limitations

2. Well Formation Instability

3. Narrow Drilling Tolerance Window (DTW)

4. Fluid Circulation Loss:

2.6 Nano based drilling fluids applications:

2. Controlling Fluid Circulation Loss & Minimizing Formation Damage

3. Increasing wellbore stability & overcoming NDW challenges

4. Minimizing differential Sticking possibilities

5. Reducing torque and drag problems and increases rate of penetration

6. Minimizing bit balling problems:

7. Decreasing the environmental impact of drilling fluids:

(ZnO + H2S → ZnS + H2O)

9. Increase down hole tools life:

2.7. Nano drilling fluid additives

3. Nano-iron oxide (III)

Fig.8 Promising nanoparticle applications in drilling fluids

Investigated NP Improved parameters References

Aluminum oxide Improving rheological properties Alsaba et al. (2018)

Copper oxide Plug nanopores in shale Kumar et al. (2018)

CNT–polymer nanocomposite Improving rheological properties Hafiz et al. (2018)

Iron oxide Improving filtration characteristics Mahmoud et al. (2018)

Iron oxide Improving lubricity of drilling fluids Alvi et al. (2018)

Nanoclay Improving filtration characteristics Vipulanandan et al. (2018b)

Nanopolymer Improving filtration characteristics Xu et al. (2013)

Non-modified silica nanoparticles Improving sealing of pores Wang et al. (2018)

Silicon dioxide Improving rheological properties Gbadamosi et al. (2018)

Silicon dioxide Improving shale inhibition Yang et al. (2017)

Titanium oxide Improving rheological properties Parizad et al. (2018)

Titanium oxide Improving rheological properties Minakov et al. (2018)