Compliance Monitoring Report
Compliance Monitoring Report
Compliance Monitoring Report
Project Coordinates:
(This section should include a summary of the major findings for the monitoring period. For example, a
statement that there were no major activities that influenced the monitoring parameters during the
monitoring period can be made if there were really no activities by the proponent that affected the
monitored parameters. ) – provide brief summary of projects’ environmental compliance/non in the
period covered
A. Compliance Monitoring
(The status of compliance to the ECC conditionalities and the attainment of EMP commitments should be
elaborated in this section. Reasons for noncompliance or unmet commitment should be explained and
solutions and measures to attain full compliance of ECC terms and conditions as well as satisfactory
attainment of EMP commitments should be discussed as renewed efforts for the next monitoring period.
Table 1 may be used to summarize the status of compliance.)
B. Impact Monitoring
This section shall contain relevant graphical presentation of quantitative and semi-quantitative impact
monitoring results showing trends, comparing past monitoring results with the current. Relevant
monitoring results in the other SMR modules shall be referred to. The latest monitoring findings and
conclusion should be discussed in text form.
Qualitative impact monitoring results may be presented in text form or in terms of pictorial coverage, if
applicable. Examples of qualitative impacts are those relating to quality of life, degree of happiness, and
sense of environmental cleanliness.
The current monitoring results must be related to the historical trend for each parameter. Any deviation
from this trend must be explained. More, importantly, the discussion must focus on point-by-point
comparison of the gathered values with Environmental Quality Performance Levels (EQPLs), if EQPLs
have been committed by the Proponent or established with the Multi-partite Monitoring Team. The
monitoring results could also be used to determine the action and limit levels for the specific project.
These should all be presented here in detail and summarized in the conclusions and recommendations
section.
It should also cite the weather conditions and other factors which may affect the results of the sampling
activities.
The status of compliance to recommendations from previous monitoring and measures included in the
action plan should be described and any unmet commitment must be rationalized and alternative, if
needed, presented.
Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation
AIR
WATER
HAZ
WASTE
SOLID
WASTE
o Action Level-point where management measures must be employed so as not to reach the regulated threshold or
limit level, or to reduce deterioration of affected environmental component to pre-impact or optimum environmental
quality
o Limit Level-regulated threshold of pollutant (standard that must not be exceeded); point where emergency response
measures must be employed to reduce pollutants to lower than standard limit.
o NOTE: Section on EQPLs may be filled out as a Proponent’s draft commitment or after these have been established
and mutually agreed upon among Proponent, EMB and other MMT members. Otherwise, only the LIMIT Level shall be
the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that environmental management measures are formulated at the
“ACTION level” so as not to exceed this regulated threshold.
Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses
Budget Actual Expenses
Budget for MMT
MMT expenses
(ONLY (ONLY
Expense Item* Direct from THOSE WHO Direct Co. THOSE WHO
Co. WERE Expense WERE
REQUIRED REQUIRED
TO HAVE TO HAVE
MMT) MMT)
A. Implementation of Management Plans & Programs
1) Environmental Impact (must be (must be (must be (must be
Mitigation Plan filled) filled) filled) filled)
(must be (must be
2) Social Development Plan
filled) filled)
(must be (must be
3) IEC Plan
filled) filled)
4) Enhancement Programs (if (must be (must be (must be (must be
any) filled) filled) filled) filled)
B. Implementation of Monitoring Plans
(must be (must be (must be (must be
1) Self-Monitoring
filled) filled) filled) filled)
2) Environmental Monitoring (must be (must be
Fund (with MMT) filled) filled)
3) Environmental Guarantee (must be (must be
(if necessary) (if necessary)
Fund filled) filled)
*For mining projects, equivalent cost items shall be adopted, e.g. SDMP in lieu of SDP.
The conclusions and recommendations should preferably be in a bulleted format and as much as possible
grouped according to coherent themes, such as the following headings.
A. Compliance Status
Only the key conclusions about the status of compliance to ECC and EMP are included in this
section. The status of non-compliances should be particularly tracked throughout all SMRs even if
compliance has been already attained. Recommended additional measures or amendments to the
EMP should be presented here.
B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the Proponent as its commitment or if
opted to be mutually agreed upon by Proponent with the EMB and other members of the MMT)
Only the key conclusions on meeting the set EQPLs are included in this section.
Only the key conclusions about the status of EMP implementation and recommended additional
measures or amendments should be presented here.
The proponent should fill-up or update the project’s environmental risk categorization questionnaire
(presented in Annex 2-7d of the Revised Procedural Manual of DAO 2003-30) – applicable on the
Second Semi-annual ECC Compliance Monitoring Report.
The specific actions for the next monitoring period, including carry-overs from previous monitoring
periods, should be detailed in this section.
V. ATTACHMENTS
(PCO) (HEAD)
Name/Position Name/Position
Date Date
Attachment B & C (you may use this if you don’t have available tabulated form )
Monitoring Environmental Environmental Environmental Impact
Environmental Impact
Objective Aspect Monitoring Plan Mitigation Plan
AIR
WATER
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
SOLID
WASTE
SOCIO
(PEOPLE)