Proforma Proponent CMR
Proforma Proponent CMR
Proforma Proponent CMR
ANNEX 3-1
PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR
PROPONENTS NAME
This section should include a summary of the major findings for the monitoring period. For example, a
statement that there were no major activities that influenced the monitoring parameters during the
monitoring period can be made if there were really no activities by the proponent that affected the
monitored parameters.
A. Compliance Monitoring
The status of compliance to the ECC conditionalities and the attainment of EMP commitments should be
elaborated in this section. Reasons for noncompliance or unmet commitment should be explained and
solutions and measures to attain full compliance of ECC terms and conditions as well as satisfactory
attainment of EMP commitments should be discussed as renewed efforts for the next monitoring period.
Table 1 may be used to summarize the status of compliance.
Table 1. Summary Status of ECC & EMP Compliance
204
ANNEX 3-1
B. Impact Monitoring
This section shall contain relevant graphical presentation of quantitative and semi-quantitative impact
monitoring results showing trends, comparing past monitoring results with the current. Relevant
monitoring results in the other SMR modules shall be referred to. The latest monitoring findings and
conclusion should be discussed in text form.
Qualitative impact monitoring results may be presented in text form or in terms of pictorial coverage, if
applicable. Examples of qualitative impacts are those relating to quality of life, degree of happiness, and
sense of environmental cleanliness.
The current monitoring results must be related to the historical trend for each parameter. Any deviation
from this trend must be explained. More, importantly, the discussion must focus on point-by-point
comparison of the gathered values with Environmental Quality Performance Levels (EQPLs), if EQPLs
have been committed by the Proponent or established with the Multi-partite Monitoring Team. The
monitoring results could also be used to determine the action and limit levels for the specific project.
These should all be presented here in detail and summarized in the conclusions and recommendations
section.
205
ANNEX 3-1
response should be explained. Moreover, causative factors must be identified and additional solutions
and mitigation measures proposed, if needed.
It should also cite the weather conditions and other factors which may affect the results of the sampling
activities.
The status of compliance to recommendations from previous monitoring and measures included in the
action plan should be described and any unmet commitment must be rationalized and alternative, if
needed, presented.
Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation
Sampling & Measurement Stand Remarks
Envtl
Results ard/ (EQPL*
Monitoring Envtl Envtl Monitoring Mgmt.
Stn/ EIS commitm
Objective Aspect Impact Parameter Mea-
Locn Previous Current Predict ent, if
sure
ion any)
The conclusions and recommendations should preferably be in a bulleted format and as much as
possible grouped according to coherent themes, such as the following headings.
206
ANNEX 3-1
A. Compliance Status
Only the key conclusions about the status of compliance to ECC and EMP are included in this
section. The status of non-compliances should be particularly tracked throughout all SMRs even if
compliance has been already attained. Recommended additional measures or amendments to the
EMP should be presented here.
B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the Proponent as its
commitment or if opted to be mutually agreed upon by Proponent with the EMB and other members
of the MMT)
Only the key conclusions on meeting the set EQPLs are included in this section.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Name/Position Name/Position
Date Date
207