Compendium For ROB by Indian Railway

BACK OF COVER PAGE
(BLANK)
FOREWORD
Road Over Bridges (ROBs) are key components of any Road network.
Ambitious expansion of road network in the Country requires construction
of ROBs on a large scale. Indian Railways has also embarked on a mission
to eliminate manned level crossings to improve mobility and safety in train
operations. Thus, fast track and cost-effective construction of ROBs across
the Indian Railway network is need of the hour.
The above objectives can be achieved only through meticulous planning and
adoption of cost effective design and construction methodologies. In a step
forward, RDSO has prepared this Compendium for Road Over Bridges on
Indian Railways with an aim to disseminate good practices in planning of
ROBs, launching operations and to create a repository of drawings in use
over Indian Railways. It will not only save precious time but also avoid the
duplicity of efforts in developing designs for each ROB. The fact that 188
drawings included in the Compendium have been approved by Zonal
Railways should obviate the need for approval if they are to be used. Apart
from this, 30 RDSO standard drawings have also been included in this
Compendium. All these drawings are to be adopted for Railway portion
spans only.
The Compendium is being issued in the form of RDSO Report No. BS-132
for use over Indian Railways. It is hoped that Zonal railways, NHAI, State
Governments, etc. will get benefitted from the Compendium for expeditious
execution of ROB Projects.
Bridge & Structures Directorate

RDSO-Lucknow
i
This page is left blank intentionally.
CONTENTS
Sl. Description Page No.

No.
1 Foreword i
2 Contents ii
3 Chapter I Introduction 1-6
4 Chapter II Planning of Road Over Bridges (ROBs) 7-24
5 Chapter III List of Drawings suitable for Special 25-80

Vehicle Loading
6 Chapter IV List of drawings for other than Special 81-130

Vehicle Loading
7 Chapter V Instructions regarding approval of non- 131-134

RDSO drawings
8 Chapter VI Summary of technical publications 135-142

issued by RDSO for execution of ROBs
9 Chapter VII Instructions regarding launching of 143-166

girders
10 Annexures 1- Railway Board‘s instruction regarding 167-171

layout of piers and selection of span
for ROBs.
2- Railway Board‘s instruction regarding
Skew angles to be adopted in the
Road Over Bridges (ROBs).
ii
While every care has been taken to ensure accurate compilation, users are advised to refer to original drawings,
latest letters and instructions on these technical matters. The Compendium is a referral document and should not be
a basis for deciding contractual & financial matters. Nothing in this Compendium supersedes any instructions on the
subject matter issued by Railway Board, RDSO and IRC. Examples and illustrations contained in the Compendium
are indicative only. Please give feedback to RDSO if there are any issues/ errors with respect to these
designs/drawings.
Chapter I
Introduction
1
2
1.1 Level crossings (LCs) over Indian Railways network have always
remained a safety concern for road users as well as railway
passengers. All unmanned level crossings have been successfully
eliminated from Indian Railways network in a mission mode. However,
on manned level crossings, Road Over Bridges (ROBs) in lieu of these
level crossings are generally constructed, if traffic density is more than
one lakh Train Vehicle Units (TVUs) subject to consent of State
Government for closure of the LC and sharing of cost.
1.2 Proposals for construction of ROBs in lieu of level crossings are

received at various levels in Zonal Railways from State Government/
Road Authorities. After completing various formalities these works are
sanctioned, normally on cost sharing basis.
1.3 Faster execution of these ROB works not only increases safety of Road
and Railway Passengers but also reduces disruption to train
operations. It is important that time taken in planning, designing and
execution of ROB works is reduced to the maximum possible extent.
In order to achieve this objective, RDSO has standardized ROB girder
designs for various span configurations. This standardization has
helped field Engineers a lot in adopting standard spans for repetitive
use instead of wastage of time and money spent in designing these
girders for each use case.
1.4 Railway Board has issued instructions time and again to adopt
standard design of ROB girders issued by RDSO for ROBs from safety
consideration as-well-as to expedite execution of work. However in
unavoidable circumstances non-RDSO spans can be used due to site
constraints. Many such non-standard ROB spans have been designed
and used by various Zonal Railways. This compendium is an effort to
compile all such RDSO standard as-well-as non RDSO drawings and
make them available for all stake holders involved in ROB planning
and execution works. These drawings are to be adopted for Railway
portion spans only.
3
1.5 Typically, ROB girders can be classified into following types:
a) Bow String Arch Steel Girders,
b) Composite Steel Plate Girders,
c) Truss type (Open Web) Steel Girders,
d) Pre-stressed Concrete (PSC) I-section Girders,
e) Pre-stressed Concrete (PSC) Box Girders.
f) Pre-stressed Concrete (PSC) Segmented Box Girder
Fig. a): Composite Steel Plate Girder Fig. b): Truss type (Open Web) Steel
Girder
Fig. c): Bow String Arch Steel Girder

Figure 1: Types of ROB Girders
4
1.6 For developing design and drawings following Codes and Special
Publications are helpful-
IRC SP:73-2018 Manual of Specifications and Standards for

Two Laning of Highways with Paved Shoulder.

Four Laning of Highways.

Six Laning of Highways.
IRC 5-2015 Standard Specifications and Code Of Practice

for Road Bridges, Section -I General Features
of Design.
IRC 6-2017 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice

for Road Bridges, Section-II – Loads and
Stresses
IS 800-2007 General Construction in Steel — Code of

Practice.
IRC SP:69-2011 Guidelines and Specifications for Expansion

Joints.

for Road Bridges, Section-VI – Composite
Construction.

for Road Bridges, Section-V – Steel Road
Bridges.
IRC 83 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice

for Road Bridges, Bearings.
IRC 112-2020 Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges.
IS 2062-2011 Hot Rolled Medium and High Tensile

Structural Steel – Specification.
IS 816-1969 Code of Practice for use of Metal Arc Welding

for General Construction in Mild Steel.
IS 1786-2008 High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires

for Concrete Reinforcement – Specification.
5
IS 9595-1996 Metal-Arch Welding of Carbon and Carbon
Manganese Steel – Recommendations.
IRC:78 - IRC 78-2014 Road Bridges Foundation and Substructure
IRC SP:105 Explanatory Handbook to IRC:112 Code of

Practice for Concrete Road Bridges
IS 2911 - Design and Construction of Pile Foundations

-Code of Practice (all parts)
Note: Readers are advised to always refer latest version of

Code/Specification for making references.
1.7 For guidance of field engineers involved in Steel Girder Fabrication,

RDSO has published many Technical Guidelines covering structural
as-well-as Quality Control related aspects. Chapter VI contains a list
of these Technical Publications along with brief description of the
contents therein. A thorough understanding of these aspects will
result in quality manufacturing of steel girders.
6
Chapter II
Planning of Road Over Bridges (ROBs)
7
8
2.1 Planning of Road Over Bridges (ROBs): General
2.1.1 Road Over Bridges are being planned at a large number of places on
Indian Railways to eliminate the level crossings. These assets are
going to be over the railway system for a long time and proper
planning of these will not only ensure proper facility to the road users
but also reduce problems to railway operations/ maintenance in
future. As far as possible it is recommended to use RDSO standard
drawings to avoid the time and cost involved in development of design
and drawings repeatedly.
2.1.2 Railway Board has also issued instructions regarding this, time and
again. Still there are site conditions where it is not possible to always
adopt RDSO standard span for a ROB. In such situations thorough
understanding of ROB planning is necessary to plan a suitable girder
for that case especially in cases of skew crossings. The following
content will help in understanding these planning aspects which are
necessary for Engineers and Executives involved in ROB planning and
construction.
2.2 Planning Layout of piers and planning span lengths:
2.2.1 Deciding the layout of piers and planning of span lengths is one of the
most important exercises for any ROB construction. Railway desires
that the pier/ abutment should be located just outside or at the
railway boundaries to the extent possible. But in doing so, the span
length may sometimes become too high resulting into higher depth of
girders and more expenditure. Road Authorities may not agree to this
kind of arrangement. Under these circumstances it becomes difficult
to decide the matter.
2.2.2 The matter was well deliberated in the Railway Board and clear
instructions had been issued regarding this. The same is being
reproduced for the ready reference as Annexure – I of this
Compendium.
9
2.3 Planning of foundations: Deep foundations are, in general, costlier
as compared to the open foundations. The ROBs don‘t have water
flowing around them, so scour is not a concern and the depth of
foundation can be kept smaller also. If the soil conditions dictate or
there is some other advantages like ease of construction, reduction in
duration of speed restriction, we may go in for deep foundations like
piles. If such constraints are not there open foundations shall be
adopted, if feasible from bearing capacity considerations.
2.4 Planning of sub structure: Normal construction methodology

followed in majority of ROBs involves providing RCC sub structure in
the ROBs. At locations where space available is less, lots of extra care
is required at site during concrete casting to ensure safety of train
operations. This problem can be tackled by imposing suitable speed
restrictions and/or working in blocks. At such locations, it would,
therefore, be worth considering the option of providing precast
concrete or steel sub structure. Steel sub structure can be clad in
precast concrete to give it a better look. It can expedite the pace of
construction. Innovative methods can be explored around these
methods in order to save the construction time as well as time of
imposition of Speed Restriction.
2.5 Planning of girders:
2.5.1 As far as possible, girders as per RDSO design shall be adopted for
spans above railway tracks. Time and again Railway Board has issued
instructions to adopt standard designs of ROB girders from safety
consideration as well as to expedite execution of work. However in
unavoidable circumstances non-RDSO spans can be used due to site
constraints.
2.5.2 For shorter spans, it is preferable to adopt Composite Steel Plate type
Girders as these are comparatively easier to fabricate and erect. But
the limitation with the use of Composite Steel Plate Girder type spans
is, as the span becomes longer, the depth of the girder keeps on
increasing. This results in higher level of deck slabs over Railway
10
portion. To ramp out these higher levels in Railway portion, the
approaches become longer. In densely populated areas, urban
settlements and in other site conditions, it is not only undesirable but
also the overall cost may go up as the length of ROB is getting
increased. Therefore for longer spans, Bow String Arch type or Truss
type Open Web Girders may be adopted as they offer lesser increase in
deck level in comparison to Composite Steel Plate type girders.
2.6 Skew arrangement:
2.6.1 The term ‗angle of skew‘ or ‗skew angle‘ is the angle between the axis
of support (pier) and a line normal to the longitudinal axis of a bridge.
Axis of ROB ROB

Support Girder
(Pier)
Longitudinal
axis of the
Bridge
Pier
Line normal to
longitudinal axis
of bridge Pier
Skew
Angle α
Figure 1 Defining Skew Angle α
2.6.2 Lots of demands for design of skew girder Road Over Bridges are faced
by the railways, especially for national highways where owing to
higher speeds; road authorities are reluctant to introduce any curves
in the road alignment. Sometimes skew arrangement is required at
congested sites where change of alignment is not possible. Demands
for skew angles as high as 700 have been noticed. It must be noticed
that skew girders have the supports quite away from the natural line
of transfer of loads and as a result the girders are subjected to high
torsional loads as well as extra bending moments on the obtuse
corner. The acute corners are subjected to uplift as a result of the
asymmetry of the load due to the skew girders.
11
Railway
C.L. of Land
road boundary
ROB
Girder
Figure 2 Normal method of providing skew spans
2.6.3 Larger skew angles are not desirable as capturing the proper
behaviour of girder at larger skew angles is not easy. Providing
sufficient torsional restraint is also difficult. Therefore, efforts shall be
made to get to square alignment, if possible, or to reduce skew angles
to within limits. Latest instructions regarding skew angles to be
adopted in the Road Over Bridges (ROBs) issued by Railway Board is
being attached as Annexure -II for ready reference.
2.6.4 Advantages of reducing skew angles:
a) It is easier to provide the square alignment girders and

chances of mistakes in fabrication as well as assembly are
less.
b) Behaviour of skew girders under seismic loads is inferior to

the square arrangement. The skew arrangements are under
―not desirable‖ arrangement, in the various codes.
c) The behavior of square spans and skew girders with less than
200 skew angle is more preferable and easily understood.
Errors of design are likely to be lesser.
d) Square girders can be adopted for lower skew angles upto 200
and the fabrication is easier in such cases.
2.6.5 Methods for reducing skew angles (Providing square girders, if

feasible) in Road Over Bridges: Various strategies can be tried
individually or in combinations to reduce the skew angle as much as
12
possible. Choice of strategy/ combination thereof will depend on site
conditions. The strategies and constraints in adopting the same are
discussed below:
A. Providing longer spans: If space constraint is not there,

providing longer span can help in reducing or eliminating skew
angle. In such a case, the sub structure is skew to railway
alignment but the ROB girders are square or at lesser skew angle.
Railway
C.L. of Land
road boundary
ROB
Girder
Figure 3 Skew alignment made square by providing longer span.
Constraints:
a) The span is longer, so the depth of girder might go up
theoretically. (Does not happen practically as some margin is
kept to take care of the extra bending moments and torsion
due to skew).
b) The piers are not parallel to railway land boundary. So if the

piers are being built in railway land, the width of land
rendered unusable for future is increased.
c) Standard design of longer span required, if not available, the

design will have to be done afresh.
B. Constructing sub structure in skew to railway land boundary: It

is not mandatory that the sub structure shall be parallel to
railway land boundary even though it is desirable to reduce the
railway land permanently rendered unusable. If the space
constraint is not there, the sub structure can be constructed in
13
skew to the railway land boundary, thus reducing the skew angle
of the girders to within 20 degrees.
Railway Railway
C.L. of Land Land
road boundary boundary
ROB
ROB
Girder
Girder
Skew angle is more if piers made Skew angle reduced by making

parallel to track alignment piers skew to track alignment
Figure 4 On left: Normally provided skew girder; On right: Skew sub

structure constructed to reduce skew angle (without change in span)
Constraints:
a) The piers are not parallel to railway land boundary. So if the
piers are being built in railway land, the width of land
rendered unusable for future is increased.
b) The skew piers can violate the Schedule of Dimensions of

existing or future tracks. This needs to be checked.
C. Constructing Skew bed block: Land is a precious resource and

at lots of locations, railways might require the entire railway land
boundary for its current and future operations and the land on
approaches might also not be available. In this situation, both the
options a) and b) discussed above will not be feasible. Option b)
might not be desirable if the standard girder design is not
available for the longer length contemplated. In such situations,
an option can be to construct the foundation and the sub
structure parallel to railway land boundary occupying minimum
width, but to reduce the skew angle of the girder, the bed block
can be made in skew. In this approach, the land is not wasted
and the extra width in bed block is provided above the Schedule
14
of Dimensions so that maximum space is useable, without
affecting the train operations.
Railway
Land
boundary
ROB
Girder
Pier Cap
Pier and
foundation
Figure 5 Arrangement with pier cap in skew
Constraints:
a) The cantilever length of pier cap is increased. The depth of pier
cap can increase.
b) The skew piers can violate the Schedule of Dimensions of
existing or future tracks. This needs to be checked.
D. Altering shape of Pier Cap: The lateral clearance requirement as
per Schedule Of Dimensions (SOD) is lesser at more height above
the rail level compared to lesser heights. Therefore, the pier
wall/columns can be built at lesser distance from center line of
track as compared to the bed block. In order to reduce this lateral
distance, few steps can be taken.
a) The most obvious step is to construct a tapered pier cap, to
suit the requirement of the section modulus as per shape of
bending moment diagram. Due to the tapered shape, pier cap
can be constructed closer to the running line than a
rectangular one.
b) One innovation suggested by Northern Railway construction
organization is to construct the pier cap at a level higher than
the conventional height without changing the road level. For
this, the girders shall be provided in pockets made in the pier
cap rather than at the top of the pier on a pedestal. The
15
bearings can be provided in this pocket and thus the height
from rail level to the bottom of the pier cap can be more than
that in conventional pier caps without affecting the clearance
below the girders or the road level. The height of the end
diaphragms shall be reduced so that jacking can be done from
outside the pockets. The schematic arrangement is shown
below:
Section View of the pier cap Plan View of the pier cap
with pockets with pockets
Figure 6 Arrangement with pockets to accommodate girders
E. Providing fish bellied girders: Another method for increasing

the height of pier cap from ground is to construct fish bellied
girders as shown below.
Slab
Fish Bellied girder
Figure 7: Cross sectional view of a fish bellied girder
Disadvantage: Fish bellied girders are slightly difficult to

fabricate and require splice in bottom flange as well as web.
16
F. Providing portal across the track: A very good method to
reduce the skew angle is to rest the girders on portal provided
across the track rather than on the piers directly. This method is
used by Metros to cross the roads and other obstructions.
Casting the beam of the portal over running track is very difficult
and shall be avoided. To solve this issue and also to ensure that
the road level is not increased un-necessarily, beam of the portal
can be a steel beam and the girders of the road over bridge shall
be connected to the web of this beam. This arrangement can
utilize the standard RDSO girders by eliminating the bearing
stiffener and the bearings under the girders. The bearings in this
case shall be provided under the cross girder of the portal. The
arrangement of the piers for the portal shall be as shown in figure
8 below:
Railway
Land
boundary
Pier and
foundation
Figure 8 Layout of piers for the portal construction
The portal beam shall be provided over the piers such that the beam
is normal to the road alignment. Bearings (POT-PTFE) shall be
provided under the portal beam as shown in figure 9.
17
Railway
Land
boundary
Bearing
Portal Beam
Pier and
foundation
GL
Figure 9 Beams for portal
The beams for the ROB shall be supported on bearing stiffener in

the web of the portal beam. The layout is as shown in figure 10
below:
Railway
Land
boundary
View of girders supported

Piers for
on web of portal beam
other
girders Girder over
railway
line
oooooooooo
Girder
Cross section view of girder

connection with portal beam
Figure 10 Provision of girders on the portal
18
This arrangement can be used as per site conditions and if the
skew angle is too much, then multiple spans can be provided over
the railway track, with suitably designed portal beams/ piers.
2.7 Conclusion: Good planning of Road Over Bridges (ROBs) is an

important activity and all efforts shall be made for arriving at a plan
wherein interests of Railways as well as State Government/ Road
Authority are protected. A thoughtful consideration on above
discussed points can help in arriving at a plan which does not put
unwanted constraints on designers as well as execution team.
2.8 Summary:
2.8.1 The pages ahead contain list of various approved ROB drawings.
These include RDSO standard drawings as well as other drawings.
The purpose is to eliminate time required in designing and developing
detailed drawings of ROB girder in each use case. This compendium is
basically a repository of available drawings, catalogued properly to
easily find the best suitable girder for a specific use case. A summary
of these drawings is as follows-
RDSO Drawings Non-RDSO Drawings

CG BSG & Total CG BSG & Total
Truss Truss
With SV 4 11 15 83 23 106
Loading
Other 4 11 15 63 19 82
than SV
Loading
2.8.2 All these drawings have been made available to all Railway officials on
RDSO Railnet website i.e. http://10.100.2.4/drawing/frmLink.aspx.
2.8.3 Users are requested to take help of index given in following pages for
easy identification of drawing for their specific use case depending
upon loading, span, skew angle and carriage way width.
19
Index of Drawings for Special Vehicle (SV) Loading
(In Chapter III, Page 25 to 80, S. No. 1 to 121)
Carriage Way Width (m)
Span Skew 5.3 to 13.1 to
9.6 to 13.1 16.6 to 20.1 > 20.1
(m) (degree) 9.6 16.6
Serial number of the drawings in Chapter III
0 79
1, 2, 33,
Upto >0 & ≤ 30 1, 2 80
90, 91
24
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45 45 46
0 32 34
>24 & >0 & ≤ 30 3 35, 3, 81
<30 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45 47 48, 49, 93
0 95
4, 36, 37,
>0 & ≤ 30 4 86 73, 85
>30 & 74, 82
<36 84, 94,
>30 & ≤ 45 50
119
> 45 51, 52, 83 118
38, 99,
0 5, 97 6
100
>36 & 39, 98,
>0 & ≤ 30 76
<42 120
>30 & ≤ 45 75 96
> 45 53
7, 17,
18,
16, 40, 41,
29,
0 56, 57, 58, 8
21,
59. 88,116
101,
>42 & 103
<48 19,
44, 104,
44, 102, 109,
>0 & ≤ 30 105, 108,
106, 111
110
107
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45 54 55 87
9, 22,
23, 42, 77,
0 89 60, 61
24, 112
>48 & 26, 28
<54
>0 & ≤ 30 25 27, 92
>30 & ≤ 45 121
> 45
>54 & 0 11, 12, 29, 64 10, 13, 62, 63, 65
20
Span Skew 5.3 to 13.1 to
9.6 to 13.1 16.6 to 20.1 > 20.1
(m) (degree) 9.6 16.6
Serial number of the drawings in Chapter III
<60 114 115
>0 & ≤ 30 31, 113
>30 & ≤ 45 30
> 45
43, 66, 69,
0 67, 68
78
>60 &
>0 & ≤ 30
<66
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45 70
0 14 117 15
>66 & >0 & ≤ 30
<72 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45 71
0
>72 & >0 & ≤ 30
<78 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
0 72
>78 & >0 & ≤ 30
<84 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
21
Index of Drawings for other than Special Vehicle Loading
(In Chapter IV, Page 81 to 130, S. No. 1 to 97)
Span Skew 5.3 to 13.1 to 16.6 to
9.6 to 13.1 > 20.1
(m) (degree) 9.6 16.6 20.1
Serial number of the drawings in Chapter IV
0 22, 49
1, 2, 1, 2, 50,
Upto >0 & ≤ 30
51, 53 55
24
>30 & ≤ 45 52, 54
> 45
0 5, 26
3, 16,
24, 25,
>0 & ≤ 30 3
>24 & 58, 61,
<30 62
23, 57,
>30 & ≤ 45
59, 60
> 45 56 86
0 6, 64 40
>0 & ≤ 30 4 4, 84
27, 28,
>30 &
>30 & ≤ 45 45, 66, 80 87
<36
68
29, 63,
> 45 81, 85 86
65, 67
0 7, 69 82, 88
>0 & ≤ 30 17, 89
>36 & >30 & ≤ 45 41, 73 75
<42 30, 42,
> 45 70, 71,
72, 74
0 8,9
>42 & >0 & ≤ 30 31 46
<48 >30 & ≤ 45 76 47 90
> 45
10, 11,
0 33, 34, 78, 91
>48 & 92
<54 >0 & ≤ 30
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45 32, 77 35
12, 13,
0 20
43
>54 &
>0 & ≤ 30
<60
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45
>60 & 0 79 36, 44 93
22
Span Skew 5.3 to 13.1 to 16.6 to
9.6 to 13.1 > 20.1
(m) (degree) 9.6 16.6 20.1
Serial number of the drawings in Chapter IV
<66 >0 & ≤ 30
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45
14, 15,
0 94
18, 95
>66 &
>0 & ≤ 30
<72
>30 & ≤ 45
> 45
0 38 19, 37
>72 & >0 & ≤ 30
<78 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
0 83
>78 & >0 & ≤ 30
<84 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
0
>84 & >0 & ≤ 30
<90 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45 97
0 96
>90 & >0 & ≤ 30
<96 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
0
>96 & >0 & ≤ 30
<102 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45 48
0 21
>102 & >0 & ≤ 30
<108 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
0 39
>108& >0 & ≤ 30
<114 >30 & ≤ 45
> 45
23
24
Chapter III
List of Drawings suitable for
Special Vehicle Loading
25
26
List of RDSO drawings for Special Vehicle Loading
27
List of RDSO Standard Drawings of Composite Plate Girder
Sl.No. 1
Sub Sl.No. 1
Drawing Identification No. 1 RDSO/B-11772
Whether Fit for SV Loading 2 Yes

Designed with Congestion Factor (Y/N) 3 Yes
Month/ Year of Design (MM/YYYY) 4 10/2016
Month/ Year of Approval (MM/YYYY) 5 10/2016
Span (m) 6 18
Depth of Girder (mm) 7 865

Seismic Zone designed for 8 V
Angle of Skew designed for 9 Upto 20
Degree of curvature designed for 10 Upto 10

Number of Girders in one span 11 5 6 6
Carriageway Width (mm) 12 8500 10500 11000
Number of lanes 13 2 3 2
Direction of road traffic 14 One way One Two way

way
Deck Width (mm) 15 12300 15300 15600
Deck As per which IRC 16 SP:84- SP:87- SP:73-

Configuration Special Publication No. 2014 2013 2015
& Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 17 One side One Both side
side/Two-side) side
Kerb (Nil/One- 18 Two side Two Nil

side/Two-side) side
Crash Barrier {Number- 19 Two side Two Two side
Type (RCC/ W-Beam RCC side RCC
/Others)} RCC
Railing 20 One side One Two side

(RCC/Steel/Others) Steel side Steel
Steel
28
List of RDSO Standard Drawings of Composite Plate Girder
2 3 4
2 3 4
1 RDSO/B-11773 RDSO/B-11774 RDSO/B-11775
2 Yes Yes Yes

3 Yes Yes Yes
4 12/2016 12/2016 12/2016
5 12/2016 12/2016 12/2016
6 24 30 36
7 1220 1325 1581

8 V V V
9 Upto 20 Upto 20 Upto 20
10 Upto 10 Upto 10 Upto 10
11 5 6 6 5 6 6 5 6 6
12 8500 10500 11000 8500 10500 11000 8500 10500 11000
13 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
14 One One Two One One Two One One Two

way way way way way way way way way
15 12300 15300 15600 12300 15300 15600 12300 15300 15600

16 SP:84- SP:87 SP:73 SP:84 SP:87 SP:73 SP:84 SP:87- SP:73-
2014 -2013 -2015 -2014 -2013 -2015 -2014 2013 2015
17 One One Both One One Both One One Both

side side side side side side side side side
18 Two Two Nil Two Two Nil Two Two Nil

side side side side side side
19 Two Two Two Two Two Two Two Two Two
RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC
20 One One Two One One Two One One Two

Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
29
List of RDSO Standard Drawings of Bow String Arch Girder
Sl.No. 5 6
Sub Sl.No. 1 2
1 RDSO/B- RDSO/B-
Drawing Identification Number
10414/R 10430
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle Loading 2 Yes Yes
of IRC-6:2017
Whether Designed with Congestion 3 Yes Yes
Factor
Month/Year of Design 4 Oct-19 Jan-22
Month Year of Approval of Design 5 - Feb-22
Span (m) 6 42 42
Depth of Girder from bottom of girder to 7 1210 1558
top of deck slab (mm)
Number of Girders in one span 8 1 1
Seismic Zone designed for 9 V V
Angle of Skew designed for 10 0 0
Degree of curvature designed for 11 0 0
Carriageway Width (mm) 12 9500 14000
Number of lanes 13 2 3
Direction of road traffic 14 One way One way
Deck Width (mm) 15 12200 17000
As per which 16 - SP 87:2019
IRC Special
Publication
No. & Year
Footpath 17 One side One side
(Nil/One-side/
Two-side)
Kerb 18 Nil Nil
(Nil/One-side/
Deck Configuration
Two-side)
Crash Barrier 19 RCC RCC
{Numbers-
Type (RCC/W-
Beam/Others)
}
Railing 20 Steel W-Beam
(RCC/Steel/
Others)
30
7 8 9 10
3 4 5 6
1 RDSO/B- RDSO/B-10429 RDSO/B- RDSO/B-10428
10416/R 10417/R
2 Yes Yes Yes Yes
3 Yes Yes Yes Yes
4 Dec-19 Dec-21 Feb-20 Nov-21

5 - Dec-21 - Nov-21
6 48 48 54 56
7 1210 1558 1210 1595
8 1 1 1 1
9 V V V V
10 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0
12 9500 14000 9500 14000
13 2 3 2 3
14 One way One way One way One way
15 12200 17000 12200 17000
16 - SP 87:2019 - SP 87:2019
17 One side One side One side One side
18 Nil Nil Nil Nil
19 RCC RCC RCC RCC
20 Steel W-Beam Steel W-Beam
31
Sl.No. 11 12
Sub Sl.No. 7 8
1 RDSO/B- RDSO/B-
10415/R 10423/1R
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle Loading 2 Yes Yes
of IRC-6:2017
Factor
Month/Year of Design 4 Feb-20 Jun-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 5 - -
Span (m) 6 60 60
Seismic Zone designed for 9 V IV
Direction of road traffic 14 One way Two way
Deck Width (mm) 15 12200 14700
As per which 16 - SP 73: 2015
IRC Special
Publication
No. & Year
Footpath 17 One side Both side
(Nil/One-side/
Two-side)
Kerb 18 Nil Nil
(Nil/One-side/
Deck Configuration
Two-side)
{Numbers-
Type (RCC/W-
Beam/Others)
}
Railing 20 Steel Steel
(RCC/Steel/
Others)
32
13 14 15
9 10 11
1 RDSO/B-10427 RDSO/B-10418/R RDSO/B-10425
2 Yes Yes Yes
3 Yes Yes Yes

4 Sep-21 Oct-19 Jun-21
5 Sep-21 - Jun-21
6 60 72 72
7 1595 1210 1758
8 1 1 1
9 V V V
10 0 0 0
11 0 0 0
12 14000 9500 14000
13 3 2 3
14 One way One way One way
15 17000 12200 17000
16 SP 87:2019 - SP 87:2019
17 One side One side One side
18 Nil Nil Nil
19 RCC RCC RCC
20 W-Beam Steel W-Beam
33
34
List of Non-RDSO drawings for Special Vehicle
Loading
35
CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 16 17
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-CR-CG-01 SV-CR-CG-02
Designed Railway 2 - -
by whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 MRIDCL MRIDCL
Name of Design Consultant 4 MRIDCL MRIDCL
Consultant Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
, if any
Drawing Number 6 MRIDL/CSMT/R MRIDC/CR/NGP/ROB
OB/SS/43 /LC-39AB/SS/43.0
Series
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle 7 Yes Yes
Loading of IRC-6:2017
Whether Designed with 8 Yes Yes
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Feb.20 Feb-20
Month Year of Approval of 10 Mar.20 Apr-20
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Turbhe-Mumbai LC No. 39AB at km
865/16-866/1 between
TADLI-MOORSA
station
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite steel Composite steel girder
girder
Span (m) 13 43 43
Depth of Girder including deck 14 2650 2650
slab (mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 III III
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 0 0
Direction of road traffic 21 Two way One way
Deck Width (mm) 22 14000 12300
Deck As per which IRC 23 - SP 84-2014
Configurati Special Publication
on No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side One side
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Nil Nil
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side RCC Both side RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 One side One side
Steel/Others)
36
CENTRAL RAILWAY
18 19 20 21
3 4 5 6
1 SV-CR-CG-03 SV-CR-CG-04 SV-CR-CG-05 SV-CR-CG-06
2 - - - -
3 MRIDCL MRIDCL MRIDCL MRIDC

4 MRIDCL MRIDCL MRIDCL MRIDCL
5 IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
6 MRIDC/WS/R MRIDC/CR/NGP/ MRIDC/CSMT/RO MRIDC/CR/BSL/

OB/LC- ROB/LC- B/MANKHURD/G ROB/LC-
105/SS /43 290B/SS/43 A/SS/43.6 147/GN/45
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes Yes Yes
9 Feb-20 Mar-20 Feb-20 Jul-20
10 Mar.-20 Apr-20 Mar.-20 Sep-21

11 LC 105 of Kalmeshwar- Mankhurd- Shiroli- Jalgaon
Dondhaiche- Bharatwada Mumbai
Vikhran Road station
12 Composite Composite steel Composite steel Composite steel

steel girder girder girder girder
13 43 43 43.6 45
14 2650 2650 2650 2650
15 5 5 4 5
16 III III III II
17 0 6 0 0
18 0 0 0 0
19 8500 8500 7500 8500
20 2 2 2 2
22 12300 12300 10000 12300
23 SP 84-2014 SP 84-2014 - SP 84-2014
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil

26 Both side RCC Both side RCC Both side RCC Both side RCC
27 One side Both side Nil One side
37
38
CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl.No. 22 23
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
Designed by Railway 2 - -
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 MRIDCL MRIDCL
Consultant,
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 MRIDC/CR/BSL/ MRIDC/CR/BSL/RO
ROB/LC-1/GN/51 B/LC-95/SS/51

Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Mar-20 Mar-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Apr-20 Mar-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 LC S1 At Km Igatpuri-Bhusawal
664/11-12 Of Section of CR
Badnera-Amravati
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite steel Composite steel
girder girder
Span (m) 13 51 51
slab (mm)

Deck Width (mm) 22 10000 12300
Deck As per which IRC 23 - -
Configuration Special Publication
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side Two side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Nil Both side
Steel/Others)
39
CENTRAL RAILWAY
24 25 26 27
9 10 11 12
1 SV-CR-CG-09 SV-CR-CG-10 SV-CR-CG-11 SV-CR-CG-12
2 - - - -

5 IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
6 MRIDC/CR/NG MRIDC/CR/ROB MRIDC/CR/NGP/ MRIDC/CR/BSL/
P/ROB/LC- /177/SS/51 ROB/LC-282A ROB/LC-
282/SS/51 /SS/51.0 171/SS/53
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes Yes Yes
9 Mar-20 Mar-20 Mar-20 Mar-20

10 Mar-20 Apr-20 Mar-20 April-20
11 Kalambha Katol LC 117 of LC 282A of Bhusawal- Itarsi

Station Bhilavadi and Kalambha-Katol Section
Jalkheda Road, Nadre station
Nagpur
12 Composite steel Composite steel Composite plate Composite steel
girder girder girder girder
13 51 51 51 53
14 2750 2750 2750 3050
15 5 5 5 6
16 III III III III

17 0 20 0 19
18 0 0 0 0
19 8500 8500 8500 11000
20 2 2 2 2
21 One way One way One way Two way
22 12300 12300 12300 15600
23 IRC SP-84 2014 IRC SP-84 2014 IRC SP-84: 2014 IRC SP-73: 2015
24 One side One side One side Both side
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
27 One side One side One side Both side
40
CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 28 29
Sub Sl. No. 13 14
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 MRIDCL MRIDCL
Consultant, Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
if any
Drawing Number 6 MRIDC/CR/NGP MRIDC/CSTM/ROB/
/ROB/LC- TURBHE/54.5
27/SS/53
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Mar-20 Nov-19
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 April-20 Jan-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Wardha Station, Sion-Panvel (Turbhe)
Ballarshah,
Nagpur
girder
Span (m) 13 53 54.5
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 12300 14000
Deck As per which IRC 23 IRC SP-84: 2014 -
Configuratio Special Publication
n No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both Side RCC Both Side RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 One side One side
(RCC/Steel/Others
)
41
CENTRAL RAILWAY
30 31
15 16
1 SV-CR-CG-15 SV-CR-CG-16
2 DY. CE DY. CE
3 NHAI NHAI
4 Accerete Consulting Engineers Pvt Ltd HCC Infra Consultants
5 VJTI Mumbai IIT Mumbai
6 1066/TAR-FAG/NH- CIPL/D1036/ROB/STR/GAD/DWG
6/ST/ROB/426+781/204 /401
7 Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes
9 Dec-20 Jun-20
10 Jul-21 Dec-20
11 Tarsod-Fagne Warora-Wani
12 Composite steel girder Composite steel girder
13 58 58
14 2815 3577
15 7 7
16 III III
17 33.3 15.537
18 0 0
19 9000 12000
20 2 3
21 One Way One Way
22 12000 16500
23 - -
24 One Side One Side

25 Nil Nil
26 Both Side RCC Both Side RCC
27 RCC RCC
42
43
EASTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 32
Sub Sl. No. 1
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-ER-CG-01
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CBE
whom
PSU 3 -
Name of Design Consultant 4 L & T Infrastructure Engineering
Consultant, if Ltd.
any
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Madras
Drawing Number 6 GAD-Drg.No-B-216-2020
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle Loading 7 Yes

of IRC-6:2017
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 Yes
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Sep-21
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Sep-21
Stations/Locations where used 11 Tala Rly Station
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite girder

Span (m) 13 25.17
Depth of Girder including deck slab 14 1575
(mm)
Number of Girders in one span 15 5
Seismic Zone designed for 16 IV
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 0
Degree of curvature designed for 18 0
Carriageway Width (mm) 19 9500
Number of lanes 20 2
Direction of road traffic 21 One way
Deck Width (mm) 22 12200
Deck As per which IRC 23 -
Configuration Special Publication No.
& Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Nil
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier {Number- 26 Both side
Type (RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 One side
(RCC/Steel/Others)
44
EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 33 34
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-ECR-CG-01 SV-ECR-CG-02
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CE/CON/ECR DY. CE/BR/D/ECR
whom
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 Sparsh Samarth Infra Engg
Consultant, if Engineering Technocrats Private
any Company (P) Limited
Limited, Ranchi
Proof Consultant 5 IIT,BHU,Varanasi IIT Madras
Drawing Number 6 CAO/CON/MHX CE'S/ECR/DRG.
DRG. No.7019/ NO.-
ROB-DHN/18 ECR/SPJ/2017-
18/ROB/231
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 No No
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-17 Feb-17
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Jan-18 Dec-17
Stations/Locations where used 11 Matari-Gomoh DMH-BDMA on
Purnia-Saharsa
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite Steel Composite Steel
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 19.99 25
Depth of Girder including deck slab 14 1504 1914
(mm)
Direction of road traffic 21 Two way Two way
Deck Width (mm) 22 11400 14800
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Nil Both side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Steel/Others)
45
35 36 37 38
3 4 5 6
1 SV-ECR-CG-03 SV-ECR-CG-04 SV-ECR-CG-05 SV-ECR-BSG-01
2 CE/Con/ECR DY. CE/BR/D CE/Con/ECR CE/Con/ECR
/ECR
3 - - - -
4 Sparsh Samarth Infra Sparsh Sparsh
Engineering Engg Engineering Engineering
Company (P) Technocrats Company (P) Company (P)
Limited, Ranchi Private Limited Limited, Ranchi Limited, Ranchi-
834 002
5 IIT- BHU, IIT Madras IIT,BHU,Varanasi IIT,BHU,Varanasi
Varanasi
6 CAO/CON/MHX CE'S/ECR/DRG. CAO/CON/MHX CAO/CON/MHX
, DRG. No. NO.- DRG. No. DRG. No.
7017/ ROB- ECR/SPJ/2017- 7018/ROB- 7023/ROB-
DHN/18 18/ROB/230 DHN/18 DHN/18
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 No No No No
9 Dec-17 Dec-17 Dec-17 Dec-17
10 Jan-18 Jan-17 Jan-18 Jan-18
11 Matari-Gomoh Birpur -Bihpur Matari-Gomoh Matari-Gomoh
12 Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Bow String Steel
Girder Girder Girder Girder
13 29.702 31.25 32.08 36.98
14 2063 2850 2063 2284
15 5 6 4 2
16 V V V III
17 20 20 20 0
18 10 0 10 0
19 10500 10500 10500 10500
20 2 2 2 2
21 Two way Two way Two way Two way
22 14800 14800 11400 14800
23 - - - -
24 Both Side Both sides Nil Both sides
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
27 Both side Both sides Nil Both side
46
Sl. No. 39 40
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-ECR-CG-06 SV-ECR-BSG-02
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CE/Con/ECR CE/Con/ECR
whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 Sparsh Sparsh
Consultant, Engineering Engineering
if any Company (P) Company (P)
Limited, Ranchi- Limited, Ranchi-
834 002 834 002
Proof Consultant 5 IIT,BHU,Varanasi IIT,BHU,Varanasi
Drawing Number 6 CAO/CON/MHX NGB-LE-ROB-NU-
DRG. No. 7021/ 011-14
ROB-DHN/18
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-17 Mar-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Jan-18 Mar-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Matari-Gomoh Patna Sahib-
Banka Ghat
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite Bow String Steel
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 36.98 44
(mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 11400 15300
Deck As per which IRC 23 - IRC SP-87:2013
n No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Nil Both sides
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Steel/Others)
47
41 42 43
9 10 11
1 SV-ECR-BSG-03 SV-ECR-BSG-04 SV-ECR-BSG-05
2 CE/Con/ECR CE/Con/ECR -
3 - - -
4 Sparsh Engineering Sparsh Engineering L&T Infrastructure
Company (P) Company (P) Limited, Engineering Ltd.
Limited, Ranchi-834 Ranchi-834 002
002
5 IIT,BHU,Varanasi IIT,BHU,Varanasi IIT Madras
6 CAO/CON/MHX CAO/CON/MHX DRG. NGB-LE-ROB-NU-21-29
DRG. No. 7020/ No. 7022/ROB-
ROB-DHN/2018 DHN/2018
7 Yes Yes Yes
8 No No No
9 Dec-17 Dec-17 Mar-20
10 Jan-18 Jan-18 Mar-20

11 Matari-Gomoh Matari-Gomoh Chaksikander-Desari
12 Bowstring Steel Bowstring Steel Girder Bow String Steel Girder

Girder
13 47.42 51.199 62
14 1520 1520 1050
15 2 2 2
16 III III IV
17 0 0 0
18 0 0 0
19 10500 10500 10500
20 2 2 3
21 Two way Two way One Way
22 14800 14800 15300
23 - - IRC SP-87:2013
24 Both sides Both sides One side
25 Nil Nil Nil
26 Both side RCC Both side RCC Both side RCC
27 Both side Both side Steel - One Side
48
49
EAST COAST RAILWAY
Sl. No. 44
Sub Sl. No. 1
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-ECoR-CG-01
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 -
whom PSU 3 NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 M/s Dilip Buildcon Limited, Bhopal
Consultant, Proof Consultant 5 NIT, Bhopal
if any
Drawing Number 6 CE‘s Drg. No. 3099/17
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle 7 Yes
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 No
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 07/2020.
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 07/2020.
Stations/Locations where used 11 At Km: 860.505 between stations
PDT- KTV
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite Steel Girder
Span (m) 13 44.8
(mm)
Number of Girders in one span 15 6 (Main) & 5 (Service)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 II
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 12º 22‘ 25‖
Carriageway Width (mm) 19 (10500 + 2000) & 7000
Number of lanes 20 3 lanes & 2 lanes
Deck Width (mm) 22 14500 mm & 10800 mm
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side in two lane ROB
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others)
50
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 45 46
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NR-CG-01 SV-NR-CG-02
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CAO CAO
whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 B&S Engineering B&S Engineering
Consultant, Consultants Pvt. Consultants Pvt.
if any Ltd. Ltd.
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Delhi IIT Delhi

Drawing Number 6 P-1540-RB/2018 P-1540-RB/2018

Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jun-20 Jun-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Jun-20 Jun-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Between Rly Stn Between Rly Stn
Maripat and Maripat and
Ghaziabad Ghaziabad
Type of Superstructure 12 Steel Composite Steel Composite
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 16.998 17.524

(mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 IV IV
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 61.574° 60.559°
Carriageway Width (mm) 19 9000 9m+15m+2.5m(Cycl
ing Track)
Number of lanes 20 3 2+4=6
Deck Width (mm) 22 10000 30300
n No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Nil One side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 2 Nos RCC Crash 3 Nos RCC Crash
{Number- Type Barrier Barrier
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Nil Steel
(RCC/Steel/Others)
51
NORTHERN RAILWAY
47 48 49 50
3 4 5 6
1 SV-NR-CG-03 SV-NR-CG-04 SV-NR-CG-05 SV-NR-CG-06
2 - - CAO -
3 - - - -
4 L&T Infrastructure L&T RICE Pvt. Ltd. ASC Infratech
Engineering Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Limited Chennai Engineering
Limited Chennai
5 IIT Madras IIT Madras NIT Kurukshetra IIT Delhi
6 NRHQE Plan NRHQE Plan P-1705-RB/ NRHQE Plan No.
:ROB-107/DLI( :ROB- 107/DLI( 2019 ROB/24/UMB
SH.7) Series SH.7) Series SH01TO09
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 No No Yes No
9 Dec-20 Dec-20 Feb-21 Nov-21
10 Jan-21 Jan-21 Feb-21 Nov-21
11 Basai Dhankot Basai Dhankot Between Rly Stn Nangala SH on
Section LC No 29 Section LC No 29 Kaithal and Sutlaj River
&30 at Rly KM & 30 at Rly KM Nirwana
37/3-4 & Delhi 37/3-4 & Delhi
Rewari Sec. Rewari Sec.
12 Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite
13 26.392 to 26.718 26.392 to 26.719 28.36 31.2
14 1695 1695 1640 2085
15 4 6 6 5
16 IV IV IV IV
17 52.056 to 52.406 52.204 to 52.51 58° 43.93
18 0 0 0 0
19 9000 11000 11000 9500
20 2 2 2 2
21 One way One way Two way One way

22 11000 14000 15600 12500
23 - - IRC SP 73-2015 -
24 Nil One side Both Side One side
25 Nil Nil Nil One side
26 Both side Both side 2 Nos RCC One side RCC

Crash Barrier
27 Nil One side One side Steel One side
52
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 51 52
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NR-CG-07 SV-NR-CG-08
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CAO -
whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 RICE Pvt. Ltd. L&T Infrastructure
Consultant,
if any Proof Consultant 5 NIT Kurukshetra IIT Madras
Drawing Number 6 P-1705-RB/2019 NRHQE Plan:ROB-
107/DLI/ SH.01
Series

Whether Designed with Congestion 8 Yes No
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Nov-20 Dec-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Nov-20 Jan-21
Stations/Locations where used 11 Between Rly Stn Basai Dhankot
Kaithal and Section LC NO 29
Nirwana and 30 at Railway
Km 37/3-4

Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 34.36 35.685 to 37.215
(mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 58° 52.065 to 53.009
Direction of road traffic 21 Two Way One way
Deck Width (mm) 22 15600 14000
Deck As per which IRC 23 IRC SP 73-2015 -
n No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Both side One side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 2 Nos RCC Both side RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 One side Steel One side
Steel/Others)
53
NORTHERN RAILWAY
53 54 55 56
9 10 11 12
1 SV-NR-CG-09 SV-NR-CG-10 SV-NR-CG-11 SV-NR-CG-12
2 - - - CAO
3 - - - -
4 L&T L&T L&T G.R. Infra Project
Infrastructure Infrastructure Infrastructure Ltd.
5 IIT Madras IIT Madras IIT Madras IIT BHU
6 NRHQE NRHQE NRHQE P-1828-RB/2020
Plan:ROB- Plan/ROB- Plan/ROB-
107/DLI / SH.01 107/DLI (SH.11) 107/DLI (SH.11)
Series Series Series
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 No No No Yes
9 Dec-20 Dec-20 Dec-20 Aug-20

10 Jan-21 Jan-21 Jan-21 Aug-20
11 Basai Dhankot Basai Dhankot Basai Dhankot Between Rly Stn
Section LC NO 29 Section LC No 29 Section LC No 29 Lohta and
and 30 at Rly KM And 30 at Rly KM and 30 at Choukhandi
37/3-4 37/3-4 Railway KM
37/3-4
12 Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite
13 36.056 to 37.04 42.226 to 47.007 42.226 to 47.007 43.8
14 2085 2125 2125 2507
15 4 4 6 6
16 IV IV IV IV
17 51.342 to 52.513 52.51/52.406 52.51/52.406 0
18 0 0 0 0
19 9000 9000 11000 11500
20 2 2 3 3
22 10000 11000 14000 14500
23 - - - -
24 Nil Nil One side One side
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
26 Both side RCC Both side RCC Both side 2 Nos RCC Crash
Barrier
27 Nil Nil One side One side Steel
54
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 57 58
Sub Sl. No. 13 14
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NR-BSG-01 SV-NR-CG-13
whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 Rice Pvt.Ltd Almond Global Infra
Consultant, Consultant Ltd.
if any
Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU IIT Kanpur

Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Sep-21 Dec-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Sep-21 Dec-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Jalandhar- Between Rly Stn
Pathankot Kakori and Lucknow
Type of Superstructure 12 Bow String Girder Steel Composite

Girder
Span (m) 13 44.5 46.4
(mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 IV III
Deck Width (mm) 22 15200 14500
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Both side One side Steel
(RCC/Steel/Others
)
55
NORTHERN RAILWAY
59 60 61 62
15 16 17 18
1 SV-NR-BSG-02 SV-NR-BSG-03 SV-NR-BSG-04 SV-NR-BSG-05
2 CBE SPL CAO CAO CAO
3 PWD Bhatinda UPEIDA - -
4 - B&S Engg B&S Engineering ASC Infra Pvt Ltd
Consultants Pvt. Consultants Pvt.
Ltd. Ltd.
5 MNAIT Bhopal - Dr. Dipti Ranjan IIT Delhi
Sahoo, IIT Delhi
6 P-1435-RB/2017 BSEC/1910/RO P-1655-RB/2018 P-1656-RB/2018
B-01/SD-101
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 No Yes Yes Yes
9 Mar-18 - Oct-19 May-19
10 Jul-18 Jun-20 Oct-19 May-19
11 Maur-Talwandi Lko-Sln Section Lucknow Tulsinagrar -

Sultanpur Section Malipur
at Anoopganj Stn
12 Bow String Bowstring Girder Bowstring Girder Bowstring Girder
Girder
13 48 50 50 56
14 1235 1638 1790 1745
15 1 1 1 1
16 III III III IV
17 0 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 0
19 11000 16650 16650 16650
20 3 4 4 4
21 Two way One way One way One way
22 12000 21250 21250 21250
23 - - - -
24 Both side Both Side Both Side Both side

25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
26 Both side RCC Both Side RCC Both side RCC Both side RCC
27 Both side Both Side Both side Steel One side
56
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 63 64
Sub Sl. No. 19 20
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NR-BSG-06 SV-NR-BSG-07
whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 B&S Engg Asc Infratech Pvt Ltd
Consultant, Consultants Pvt.
if any Ltd.
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Delhi Asccrte Consulting
Pvt .Ltd. Gurgaon
Drawing Number 6 P-1658-
P-1910-RB/2020
RB/2018
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle 7 Yes
Yes
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 Yes
Yes
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-19 Sep-21
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Dec-19 Sep-21
Stations/Locations where used 11 Triveniganj And Piparsand- Lucknow
Haidergarh
Type of Superstructure 12 Bowstring Girder Bowstring Girder
Span (m) 13 56 56
(mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 21550 14800
n No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side RCC Both Side RCC
{Number- Type (RCC/
W-Beam /Others)}
Railing 27 Both side One side
(RCC/Steel/Others)
57
NORTHERN RAILWAY
65 66 67 68
21 22 23 24
1 SV-NR-BSG-08 SV-NR-BSG-09 SV-NR-BSG-10 SV-NR-BSG-11
2 CAO CBE CAO CAO
3 UPEIDA - - -
4 ASC Infratech Structure B&S Engineering B&S Engineering
Pvt Ltd Consultants Pvt Consultant Pvt Consultants Pvt.
Ltd Ltd Ltd.
5 Transys Jamia Milia IIT Delhi IIT Delhi
Consultants Pvt Islamia
Ltd
6 B011 P-1609-RB/2018 P-1657- RB/2018 P-1657-RB/2018
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes Yes Yes
9 Nov-19 - Nov-19 Nov-19
10 Jan-20 Feb-19 Nov-19 Nov-19
11 SNL-ASR Section Kurebhar And Between Rly Stn
Faizabad-
Dwarika Ganj Kurebhar and
Jaunpur Section
Dwarikaganj
12 Bow String Girder Bowstring Girder Bowstring Girder
Bowstring Girder
13 56 62 62 62
14 1453 1335 1836 1836
15 1 1 1 Bowstring Girder
16 III III III III
17 0 0 0 Straight
18 0 0 0 Straight
19 18450 10500 16650 16650
20 5 3 4 4
21 One way One way One way One Way
22 20750 13000 21550 21550
23 - - - -
24 One side One side Both side Both side
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
27 One side Steel One side Steel One side Steel One side Steel
58
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 69 70
Sub Sl. No. 25 26
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NR-BSG-12 SV-NR-CG-14
whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 ASC Infratech B&S Engineering
Consultant, Pvt Ltd Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
if any
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Bombay IIT Delhi
Drawing Number 6 P-1911- P-1540-RB/2018

RB/2020
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Sep-21 Jun-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Sep-21 Jul-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Anoopganj And Between Rly Stn
Bakkas Maripat and
Ghaziabad
Type of Superstructure 12 Bowstring Girder Steel Composite
Girder
Span (m) 13 62.01 62.373
slab (mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 III IV
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 0 58.352°
Carriageway Width (mm) 19 11500 9m+15m+2.5m
(Cycling)
Number of lanes 20 3 2+4=6
Deck Width (mm) 22 14800 30300
n No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side One Side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side RCC 3 Nos RCC Crash
{Number- Type Barrier
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 One side Steel
(RCC/Steel/Others)
59
NORTHERN RAILWAY
71 72
27 28
1 SV-NR-CG-15 SV-NR-BSG-13
2 CAO CAO
3 - -
4 B&S Engineering Consultants Pvt. AECOM India Pvt Ltd
Ltd.
5 IIT Delhi IIT Delhi
6 P-1540-RB/2018 P-1682-RB/2019
7 Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes
9 Jun-20 May-19
10 Jun-20 May-19
11 Between Rly Stn Maripat and Sampla and Kharawar
Ghaziabad
12 Steel Composite Girder Bowstring Girder
13 69.998 80
14 3550 1947
15 4 1
16 IV IV
17 61.574° 0
18 0 0
19 9000 13000
20 2 3
21 One Way One way
22 10000 16000
23 - -
24 Nil One side
25 Nil Nil
26 2 Nos RCC Crash Barrier 2 Nos RCC Crash Barrier
27 Nil One side
60
61
NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 73 74
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NCR-CG-01 SV-NCR-CG-02
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 - -
whom PSU 3 NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 KCC Buildcon Pvt Transys Consulting
Consultant, Limited Pvt Ltd
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU IIT Delhi
Drawing Number 6 KCCB/DV- BE-II-74+966, 807-
5/STR/ROB/149+ ROB-306
937/SS/ST_001
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 - -
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jan-20 Feb-21
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Mar-21 Feb-21
Stations/Locations where used 11 Near Junction of Mahokhar To
SH44 to Delhi Kaohari Uttat
Vadodra Greenfield Pradesh
Alignment
Rajasthan
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 36 36
(mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 21250 17400
n No. & Year
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Nil One side
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Nil One side
(RCC/Steel/Others)
62
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
Sl. No. 75 76
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NFR-CG-01 SV-NFR-CG-02
Designed by Railway 2 CBE CBE
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI -
Name of Design 4 Asabz Infra Credence Imagineering
Consultant, Consultant Sollutions
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU IIT Delhi
Drawing Number 6 ROB/B/49/2017 ROB/B/6/1/2019
Whether Designed with 8 No No
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Feb-21 Mar-19
Month Year of Approval of 10 Apr-21 Mar-19
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Katihar-Jogabani Oodlabari-Damdim
girder
Span (m) 13 37.2 41.0
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 32.49 8.2
Deck Width (mm) 22 12500 12500
Configuratio Special
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Nil One side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Both side One side
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both Side RCC Both Side RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Nil One side RCC
(RCC/Steel/
Others)
63
77 78
3 4
1 SV-NFR-BSG-01 SV-NFR-BSG-02
2 CBE CBE
3 NHAI PWD
4 Transys Cunsultants Pvt Ltd EIS Planners & Engineers
5 IIT Mumbai IIT Guwahati

6 ROB/B/14/1/2020 ROB/B/03/2020 series
7 Yes Yes
8 No No
9 - Jan-20
10 Nov-20 Jun-20
11 Raiganj-Dalkhola section of NH-34 Jorhat Town
12 Bow String Girder Bow String Girder

13 49.2 62.0
14 1353 1231
15 One One
16 V IV
17 0 0
18 0 0
19 13000 10500
20 3 2
21 One way Two way
22 15800 11400
23 - -
24 One side Both side
25 Nil Nil
26 Both side RCC Both side RCC
27 Steel Both side Steel
64
NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 79 80
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NWR-CG-01 SV-NWR-CG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design 4 G Eng.Advisory AECOM India
Consultant, Consultant Services
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Delhi IIT Delhi
Drawing Number 6 CBE-1182/BKN/ CBE-
ROB/2020 1171/BKN/ROB/2020
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Aug.2020 Jul-20
Month Year of Approval of 10 Nov. 2020 Oct.2020
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Kalanpur kalan- Guru kalan-
Khrak Bhojiyawas
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite Steel Composite Steel Girder
Girder
Span (m) 13 24 24
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 14500 14500
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Nil Nil
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Nil Nil
Steel/Others)
65
81 82 83 84
3 4 5 6
1 SV-NWR-CG-03 SV-NWR-CG-04 SV-NWR-CG-05 SV-NWR-CG-06
2 CBE CAO CAO CAO
3 NHAI - - -
4 Tech Tangant Jindal Multi Media Multi Media
Solution Consortium Construction Construction
Pvt.Ltd Pvt.Ltd
5 MNIT Jaipur IIT Roorkee SVNIT Surat SVNIT Surat
6 CBE- CAO/C/JP 8025 CAO/C/JP/811& CAO/C/JP/8101
1154/JU/ROB TO 8030/D-ROB 8112/8141/D- TO 8103/D-UDZ-
/2020 UDZ-HMT. HMT
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 No No No No
9 Mar-20 Jul-21 Aug-21 Aug-21

10 Aug.2020 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21
11 Osian-Bhimkor Rewari-Ringas Raighadh Road & Shamla JI Road &

(CH:3.3255) Viravada Raighadh Road
(CH:286/3-4)
12 Composite steel Composite steel Composite steel Composite steel
13 30 30.533 32.25 36
14 1625 1775 2435 1840
15 7 12 6 6
16 III III III III
17 14.24 5.57 55 35
18 0 0 0 0
19 13500 13000 10500 10500
20 3 3 3 3
22 16500 15700 15300 15300
23 - - IRC 87-2013 IRC 87-2013
25 Nil One side Both side Both side
66
Sl. No. 85 86
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-NWR-CG-07 SV-NWR-CG-08
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Force Structural Tech Tangent
Consultant, Engineers Solution Pvt Ltd
if any Mumbai
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai MNIT Jaipur
Drawing Number 6 CBE- CBE-
1241/JP/ROB/2 1234/JU/ROB/202
021 1
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jan. 2021 Sep.2020
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Aug. 2021 July. 2021
Stations/Locations where used 11 Sawaimadhopur- Jamiyana- Balotra
Devepur
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 36 36
slab (mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 II III
Deck Width (mm) 22 21250 16500
Configuration Special
Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Nil One side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Nil nil
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Nil One side
Steel/Others)
67
87 88 89
9 10 11
1 SV-NWR-CG-09 SV-NWR-CG-10 SV-NWR-CG-11
2 CAO CAO CBE
3 - -- NHAI
4 BPS Enginering Dhabai Construction, Accrete Consulting
Siker Eng.
5 TTL Enginering - IIT-BHU

6 CAO/C/JP/7895 TO CAO/C/JP/7971 TO CBE-
7901/D-ROB/DO-GGC 7974/DFL-SBR-ROB-01 1233/JU/ROB/2021
7 Yes Yes Yes
8 No No No
9 Apr-21 Apr-21 Jun-20

10 Apr-21 Jun-21 Jul-21
11 DAUSA (NH 11A) FL-SBR(CH:1/3-4) Dehmok- Surpura
12 Composite Steel Girder Composite Steel Girder Composite Steel Girder
13 43.3 43.72 50
14 2750 2250 1545
15 9 5 6
16 II II III
17 50.138 0 0
18 0 0 0
19 20250 10000 13500
20 4 2 3
21 One way One way One way
22 21250 12500 16300
23 - - -
24 Nil One side One side
25 Nil Nil One
26 Both side RCC Both side RCC Both side RCC
27 Nil One side One side
68
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 90 91
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-SR-CG-01 SV-SR-CG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Force Structural Force Structural
Consultant, if Engineers Pvt Ltd Engineers Pvt
any Ltd
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GV2/141/20 CBE/GV2/141/

17 2017
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Nov-17 Nov-17
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Aug-18 Aug-18
Stations/Locations where used 11 Nagercoil- Tovalai Nagercoil-
Station Tovalai Station
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 15.58 18.471
(mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 II II
Deck Width (mm) 22 13750 13750
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side / RCC Both side / RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 RCC RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others
)
69
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
92
3
1 SV-SR-CG-03
2 CBE
3 NHAI
4 Louis Berger
5 IIT Delhi
6 CBE/GT2/207/2017
7 Yes
8 No
9 Dec-20
10 Oct-21
11 Sillakkudi- Kallagam
12 Composite Steel Girder
13 53
14 2850
15 6
16 II
17 15
18 0
19 12000
20 3
21 One way
22 16000
23 -
24 One side
25 Both side
26 Both side / RCC
27 RCC
70
SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 93 94
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-SCR-CG-01 SV-SCR-CG-02
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CBE CBE
whom PSU 3 NHAI APRDC
Name of Design Consultant 4 L&T Infrastructure Sheladia
Consultant, Engineering Ltd Associates
if any INC,USA
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Madras IIT Madras
Drawing Number 6 GM(W)SC/Br/R- GM(W)SC/Br/R-
207/2018 to 57/2014 to
GM(W)SC/Br/R- GM(W)SC/Br/R-
216/2018 63/2014
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Aug-17 Aug-2014
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Dec-18 Dec.-2014
Stations/Locations where used 11 Allur Road - Narasaraopet-
Bitragunta Vinukonda
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite Steel Composite steel
girder girder
Span (m) 13 28.646 35.008
slab (mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 III II
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 51.66 44.37o
Deck Width (mm) 22 15000 13750
n No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side / RCC Both side
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 One side RCC One side RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others) Parapet Parapet
71
95 96 97 98
3 4 5 6
1 SV-SCR-CG-03 SV-SCR-CG-04 SV-SCR-CG-05 SV-SCR-CG-06
2 CBE CBE CAO CBE
3 MSRDC APRDC - Aurangabad
Industrial
Township Ltd.
4 B&S Engineering Sheladia - ACME
Consultants Pvt. Associates INC, Structural
Ltd. USA Consultants,
Pune
5 IIT Delhi IIT Madras - IIT Bombay
6 GM(W)SC/BR/R- GM(W)SC/Br/R- CAO/C/D/ST/5 GM(W)SC/Br/R-
157 to 166/2021 12/2014 to 52-2019 to 3/2018 to
GM(W)SC/Br/R- CAO/C/ GM(W)SC/Br/R-
16/2014 D/ST/559-2019 11/2018
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes No Yes
9 Oct-20 Aug-2014 Apr-19 Nov.-2017
10 Sep-21 Oct-2014 Nov-19 Jan.-2018

11 Amanwadi - Jaulka Bellamkonda- Bayyavaram and Karmad-
Piduguralla Anakapalli Chikalthana
Stations
12 Composite steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite steel

13 36 36.69 38.47 40.3
14 1831 2600 - 2722

15 7 6 5 6
16 II II 3 II
17 0 41o 0 11o
18 0 0 0 0
19 14750 10750 7750 11500
20 3 3 2 3
21 One way One way Two way One way
22 17550 13750 13000 14450
23 - - - -
24 One side One side Two sided One side
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
26 Two RCC Two RCC Two RCC Two RCC
27 One side RCC Two side RCC Two side RCC One side RCC
Parapet Parapet Parapet Parapet
72
Sl. No. 99 100
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-SCR-CG-07 SV-SCR-BSG-01
Designed by Railway 2 CBE CAO
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 R&B Dept, -
Telangana
Name of Design Consultant 4 Pragathi Spera Infra
Consultant, Consultants, Consultant
if any Hyderabad
Proof Consultant 5 - IIT Hyderabad
Drawing Number 6 GM(W)SC/Br/R- CAO/C/D/ST/391-
50 to 54, 64, 66 2021 series
& 69/2018

Whether Designed with 8 Yes No
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 11-2016 Feb-21
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 04-2018 Aug-21
Stations/Locations where used 11 Ramgundam - Manoharabad and
Raghavapuram Gajwvel station
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite steel Bow String Girder
girder
Span (m) 13 42 42
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 13750 12050
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side Nil
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Two RCC Two RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 One side RCC Nil
Steel /Others) Parapet
73
101 102 103 104
9 10 11 12
2 CAO CBE CBE CAO
3 - MSRDC Prime Rail Infra -
4 Srinivasa Gravitas IIT Mumbai SMR Consultants

Constructions Infrastructures
Pvt. Ltd.,
Lucknow
5 JNTU Hyderabad IIT Bombay IIT Mumbai NIT Warangal
6 CAO/C/D/ST/75 GRA/DWG/10 PRI-STR-DWG- CAO/C/D/RC/12
-2020 to CAO/C 1 to 106 AND 2281 4-2020 to
/D/ST/77-2020 GRA/DWG/10 CAO/C/D/RC/13
and RDSO /B- 8 to 112 4-2020
11758/5R
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes Yes No

9 Aug-19 Feb-20 Feb-19 Sep-19
10 Jan-20 Mar-20 Feb-19 Feb-20
11 Hafizpeta and Lasur- Chittor & RVS Mellacheruvu and
Sanathnagar Karanjgaon Nagar Revuru
Ramapuram
Stations
13 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.5
14 4350 2559 2511 2770
15 5 8 6 6
16 II II III 2
17 0 19.97 0 20
18 0 0 0 0
19 7500 16500 8500 10500
20 2 4 2 2
22 10055 19500 12500 14800
23 - - - -
24 One One side One side Two sided
25 Nil Nil Both side Nil
26 Two RCC Two RCC Both side Two-RCC
27 RCC Parapet One side RCC One side RCC Two side RCC
Parapet Parapet Parapet
74
Sl. No. 105 106
Sub Sl. No. 13 14
whom PSU 3 MORTH IPRCL
Name of Design Consultant 4 Neel Primerail Infralabs Pvt
Consultant, Construction Ltd
if any Links Pvt. Ltd.,
Gurgram
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Delhi IIT Madras
Drawing Number 6 GM(W)SC/Br/ GM(W)SC/Br/R-
R-32/2021 to 77/2020 to
GM(W)SC/Br/ GM(W)SC/Br/R-
R-42/2021 88/2020
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jan-20 01-2020
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Feb-21 08-2020
Stations/Locations where used 11 Cherukuwada Akiveedu - Pallevada
- Undi
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite Composite steel
steel girder girder
Span (m) 13 44.5 44.5
(mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 20 20o
Deck Width (mm) 22 16000 12500
n No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Two sided One side
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Nil Both side
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Two-RCC Two-RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Both side Steel One side RCC Parapet
(RCC/Steel/Others)
75
107 108 109 110
15 16 17 18
2 CBE CBE CBE CBE
3 NHAI NHAI NHAI NHAI

4 L&T Infrasructure Accrete Dilip Buildcon HBS Infra
Engineering Ltd. Consulting Limited Engineers India
Engineers
5 IIT Madras IIT-BHU IIT BHU IIT BHU
6 GM(W)SC/Br/R- 1099/GUN- 18130-RB-PS-GA- HBS/GI-
12/2015 to KOV/NH- 7311 Series IV/SE/ROB-
GM(W)SC/Br/R- 16/ST/ROB/ 246.572/SUPC/00
20/2015 18+677.385/31 4
2 to 322 & 402
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes Yes No No
9 01-2015 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19

10 02-2015 Sep-19 Jun-19 Jan-20
11 Muddanur- Denduluru- Anakapalli - Giddalur -

Mangapatnam Bhimadolu Anandapuram Vinukonda Section
Section in NH -16 of NH-544D
in A.P.
13 44.5 45.79 46 46
14 3157 2519 2722 2511
15 6 8 6 6
16 II III II III
17 20o 20 18.704 20
18 0 0 0 0
19 9500 13000 13500 11500
20 2 3 4 2
22 12900 16000 14500 12500
23 - - - -
24 Nil One side Nil Nil
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
26 Two-RCC Two-RCC Both side Both side
27 Nil RCC Parapet Nil Nil
76
Sl. No. 111 112
Sub Sl. No. 19 20
whom PSU 3 NHAI MRIDCL
Name of Design Consultant 4 Accrete MRIDCL
Consultant, Consulting
if any Engineers
Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU IIT, Bombay
Drawing Number 6 1099/GUN- GM(W)SC/Br/R-139
KOV/NH- to 147&
16/ST/ROB/18+ 156 to 164/2020
677.385 Series
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 No Yes
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Mar-19 12-2019
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Sep-19 11-2020
Stations/Locations where used 11 Gundugolanu - Chawda-Purna-
Devarapalli- Marsul
Kovvuru Section
of NH-16 In A.P.
girder girder
Span (m) 13 47.092 51.15
(mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 16000 18000
n No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Nil Two side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side Two RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Nil Two side steel
(RCC/Steel/Others)
77
113 114 115
21 22 23
1 SV-SCR-CG-20 SV-SCR-CG-21 SV-SCR-CG-22
2 CBE CAO CBE
3 PWD, Govt of - Tirupati Smart City
Maharastra Corporation Ltd.
4 L&T Construction SMR Consultants Force Structural Engineers
Infrastructure Pvt
Ltd
5 IIT Bombay - IIT Bombay
6 GM(W)SC/Br/R- CAO/C/D/RC/008- GM(W)SC/Br/R-63/2021 to
87/2018 to 93/2018 & 2018 to GM(W)SC/Br/R-71/2021
103/2018 CAO/C/D/RC/13-
2018
7 Yes Yes Yes
8 Yes No Yes
9 05-2018 Jun-17 09-2020

10 01-2018 Jan-18 04-2021
11 Manwath (Tadborgaon) Kurnool city and Tiruchanur-Tirpuati
section Dhupadu stations
12 Composite steel girder Composite steel Composite steel girder

girder
13 56.16 57.8 58
14 3395 2730 3613
15 7 6 6
16 II 2 II
17 20o 0 0
18 0 0 0
19 10500 7500 15600
20 3 2 4
21 One way Two way Two way
22 14800 12000 16600
23 - - -
24 Two side Two side Nil
25 Nil Nil Nil
26 Two RCC Two RCC Two RCC
27 Two side steel Both side RCC Nil

Parapet
78
SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 116 117
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-SWR-BSG-01 SV-SWR-BSG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Samarth LEA Associates
Consultant, if Infraengg. Pvt
any Ltd
Drawing Number 6 SWR/2019/STR- SWR/2020/STR-
15/ROB 28/ROB-
65.0/CHKE-
BAHI/JRU-
RDG/NHAI
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 - -
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 May-19 2020
Stations/Locations where used 11 Arsikere(Ask)- Chkebahi To
Birur(Rrb) Bahi
Section
Type of Superstructure 12 Bow string girder Bow string girder
Span (m) 13 48.0 72.0
(mm)
Number of Girders in one span 15 One One
Deck Width (mm) 22 16000 16000
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Two RCC Two RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 One Steel One Steel
(RCC/Steel/Others)
79
WESTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 118 119
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-WR-CG-01 SV-WR-CG-02
Designed Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CBE CBE
by whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 GR Infraprojects STUP Consultants
Consultan Pvt. Ltd Mumbai
t, if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU IIT Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 GR/KAKA/STR/RO 7618/E/DD-552
B/304
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-20 Dec-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Dec-20 Dec-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 BRLA-NLI/KM.351- NARODA-
4-8 DABHODA
/KM.399/5-6 (LC-
9)
girder girder
Span (m) 13 32.6 36
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 21250 14300
Configurat Special Publication
ion No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 0 One side
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Nil One
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Nil One side
(RCC/Steel/Others)
80
WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 120 121
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 SV-WCR-CG-01 SV-WCR-CG-02
Designed Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CBE CBE
by whom PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 Tranzroad L&T Infrastructre
Consultan Consulting Engineering Ltd
t, if any Engineering Pvt
Ltd.
Proof Consultant 5 Jain Narayan Vyas IIT Chennai
University
Drawing Number 6 HQ DRG No. GM(W) HQ DRG No. GM(W)
5569-5576 & 5585- 5528-5543
5595
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 11/2021. 12/2020.
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 12/2021. 11/2021.
Stations/Locations where used 11 LC-18 Sagar-Bina Km 997/9-11
Nagda-Mathura
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 36.79 51
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 22.8 45
Deck Width (mm) 22 15600 21250
Configurat Special Publication
ion No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Yes - Both side No
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 No No
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 RCC-Both side RCC-Both side
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 RCC-Both side No
Steel/Others)
81
Chapter IV
List of Drawings for other than Special Vehicle
Loading
82
83
List of RDSO Drawings for other than Special Vehicle
Loading
84
List of RDSO Standard Drawings of Composite Plate Girders
Sl. No. 1
Sub Sl. No. 1
Whether Fit for SV Loading 2 No
Designed with Congestion 3 No
Factor
Month/ Year of Design 4 04/2013
Month/ Year of Approval 5 04/2013
Span (m) 6 18
Degree of curvature 10 Upto 10
designed for
Number of Girders in one 11 4 4 5 5 6 6
span
Carriageway Width (mm) 12 7500 7500 7500 10500 10500 10500
Number of lanes 13 2 2 2 3 3 2
Direction of road traffic 14 One One One One One Two
way way way way way way
Deck Width (mm) 15 9900 10100 11800 12900 13400 14800
Deck As per 16 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

Configuratio which IRC
n Special
Publication
No. & Year
Footpath 17 Nil One Both Nil One Both
(Nil/One- side side side side
side/Two-
side)
Kerb 18 Both Nil Nil Both Nil Nil
(Nil/One- side side
side/Two-
side)
Crash 19 Both Both Both Both Both Both
Barrier side side side side side side
{Number- RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC
Type (RCC/
W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 20 Nil One Both Nil One Both
(RCC/Steel/ side side side side
Others) Steel Steel Steel Steel
85
Sl. No. 2
Sub Sl. No. 2
Factor
Span (m) 6 24
designed for
span
Deck Width (mm) 15 9900 10100 11800 12900 13400 14800

n Special
Publication
No. & Year
side/Two-
side)
(Nil/One- side side
side/Two-
side)
Type (RCC/
W-Beam
/Others)}
86
Sl. No. 3
Sub Sl. No. 3
Factor
Span (m) 6 30
designed for
span
Deck Width (mm) 15 9900 10100 11800 12900 13400 14800

n Special
Publication
No. & Year
side/Two-
side)
(Nil/One- side side
side/Two-
side)
Type (RCC/
W-Beam
/Others)}
87
Sl. No. 4
Sub Sl. No. 4
Factor
Span (m) 6 36
designed for
span
Deck Width (mm) 15 9900 10100 11800 12900 13400 14800

n Special
Publication
No. & Year
side/Two-
side)
(Nil/One- side side
side/Two-
side)
Type (RCC/
W-Beam
/Others)}
88
List of RDSO Standard Drawings of Bow String Arch Girders
Sl. No. 5 6
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
1 RDSO/B- RDSO/B-
Drawing Identification Number 10409/R1 10407/R1
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle Loading 2 No No
of IRC-6:2017
Factor
Month/Year of Design 4 Oct-19 Nov-19
Span (m) 6 30.0 36.0
Deck Width (mm) 15 11700 11700
As per which 16 - -
IRC Special
Publication
No. & Year
Footpath 17 Both side Both side
(Nil/One-side/
Two-side)
Kerb 18 Nil Nil
(Nil/One-side/
Deck Configuration
Two-side)
{Numbers-
Type (RCC/W-
Beam/Others)
}
(RCC/Steel/
Others)
89
7 8 9 10
3 4 5 6
1 RDSO/B- RDSO/B- RDSO/B- RDSO/B-
10408/R1 10406/R 10419/R 10410/R1
2 No No No No
3 No No No No
4 Nov-19 May-15 Sep-20 Nov-20
5 - - - -
6 42.0 48.0 48.0 54.0
7 1210 1210 1210 1210
8 1 1 1 1
9 V IV V IV
10 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0
12 7500 7500 7500 7500
13 2 2 2 2
15 11700 11700 11700 11700
16 - - - -
17 Both side Both side Both side Both side
18 Nil Nil Nil Nil
19 RCC RCC RCC RCC
20 Steel Steel Steel Steel
90
Sl. No. 11 12
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
1 RDSO/B- RDSO/B-
10422/R 10411/R1
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle Loading 2 No No
of IRC-6:2017
Factor
Month/Year of Design 4 Jun-20 Dec-19
Span (m) 6 54 60
Deck Width (mm) 15 11700 11700
As per which 16 - -
IRC Special
Publication
No. & Year
Footpath 17 Both side Both side
(Nil/One-side/
Two-side)
Kerb 18 Nil Nil
(Nil/One-side/
Deck Configuration
Two-side)
{Numbers-
Type (RCC/W-
Beam/Others)
}
(RCC/Steel/
Others)
91
13 14 15
9 10 11
1 RDSO/B-10420/R RDSO/B-10412/R RDSO/B-10421/R
2 No No No
3 No No No
4 Jul-20 Jul-20 Aug-20
5 -
6 60.0 72.0 72.0
7 1210 1210 1210
8 1 1 1
9 V IV V
10 0 0 0
11 0 0 0
12 7500 7500 7500
13 2 2 2
14 Two way Two way Two way
15 11700 11700 11700
16 - - -
17 Both side Both side Both side
18 Nil Nil Nil
19 RCC RCC RCC
20 Steel Steel Steel
92
93
List of Non-RDSO drawings for other than Special
Vehicle Loading
94
CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 16 17
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-CR-CG-01 NSV-CR-CG-02
Designed by Railway 2 DY. CE CBE
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Druta Designs GR Infra Projects
Consultant, if Limited
any Proof Consultant 5 VNIT Nagpur VJTI Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 RP-ACP1-DD- GR/WA-

P040-ROB MA/STR/ROB/294
206+483-105
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle 7 No No
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Aug-21 Dec-19
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Nov-21 May-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Amravati- Watambare-
Chikhli Mangalwedha
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 25 37.2
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 9 7.2
Deck Width (mm) 22 12000 16000
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 RCC RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others)
95
EASTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 18 19
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-ER-BSG-01 NSV-ER-BSG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 RITES (through RITES
Consultant, if L & T Ramboll)
any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Guwahati IIT Guwahati
Drawing Number 6 CE's drg nos.B- GAD No.B-31-2014,

399-2014 to B- Detailed Drawing nos
444-2014. B-332-2015 (SH-1 to
30)
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jun-14 Feb-15
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 2014 Aug-15
Stations/Locations where used 11 Park Circus Mogra
Type of Superstructure 12 Bowstring Bowstring girder
Span (m) 13 68.5 75

Depth of Girder including deck 14 - 1719
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 8400 12000
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Nil Nil
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Nil Nil
(RCC/Steel/Others)
96
Sl. No. 20 21
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-ECR-BSG-01 NSV-ECR-OWG-01
Designed by Railway 2 Dy.CE/BR/D/ECR DY. CE/BR/D/ECR
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 IRCON Aecom Asia
Consultant, if International Company Ltd.
any Limited
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Madras IIT BOMBAY
Drawing Number 6 CE Drg No. CE'S DRG. NO.-
ECR/MGS/2016- ECR/DNR/2018-
17/ROB/180 19/ROB/237
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-16 Aug-18
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Mar-17 Jul-17
Stations/Locations where used 11 Manpur Bypass DNR - Phulwari

Sarif.
Type of Superstructure 12 Bowstring Girder Truss Girder
Span (m) 13 58 104.3

(mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 15200 12000
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 Both sides One Side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 Steel RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others)
97
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 22 23
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-NR-CG-01 NSV-NR-CG-02
Designed by Railway 2 CAO CAO
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design 4 B&S Engineering Structure Consultants
Consultant, if Consultant Consultant Pvt Pvt Ltd
any Ltd
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Roorkee -
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-20 May-20
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Dec-20 May-20
Stations/Locations where used 11 Delhi-Amritsar On MTC-KRJ Section
section near
Bhandari
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 20.8 27.716
slab (mm)
Degree of curvature designed for 18 0 14.5°
Deck Width (mm) 22 12200 12200
Deck As per which 23 - -
Configuration IRC Special
Publication No.
& Year
Footpath 24 One side Both Side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 2 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Steel RCC
Steel/Others)
98
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 24 25
Sub Sl. No. 3 4
Designed by Railway 2 - CAO
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design 4 CS Engineers and Structure Consultants
Consultant, if Consultant Consultant Pvt Ltd
any
Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU -
Drawing Number 6 CSE&C/NR/LKO- P-1395-RB/2017
UTR.SUP/01
Whether Designed with 8 No Yes
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Feb-21 May-19
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Feb-21 May-19
Stations/Locations where used 11 UTR-SLN Section On MTC-KRJ Section
UP
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 25.24 28.277
slab (mm)
Degree of curvature designed for 18 0 14.5°
Direction of road traffic 21 One way Two Way
Deck Width (mm) 22 8500 12600
Configuration Special
Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Nil Both Side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 RCC
Steel/Others) Nil
99
NORTHERN RAILWAY
26 27 28 29
5 6 7 8
1 NSV-NR-CG-05 NSV-NR-CG-06 NSV-NR-CG-07 NSV-NR-CG-08
2 CAO CAO - CAO
3 - - - -
4 Via Pontium B&S Engineering Stru tech RICE Pvt Ltd
Engineering Consultants Pvt Consultant
Services Ltd Service Pvt Ltd
5 IIT BHU M.A.N.I.T. Bhopal Jamia Millia IIT,BHU Varanasi
Islamia Delhi
6 P-1960-RB/2020 P-1492-RB/2018 2019/NR/ROB- P-1638-RB/2019
B359A/201
7 No No No No
8 No No Yes Yes
9 Oct-21 Mar-19 Nov-19 Sep-21

10 Oct-21 Mar-19 Nov-19 Sep-21
11 Prayagraj Section Between MB-LKO Section Between Rly Stn
near rly stn Bhagtawala & Ghaggar and
Prayag Sangrana Rly Stn Chandigarh
12 Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel
13 30 33.48 35.163 Varying from
35.382 to 38.085
14 2055 1831 2200 2097
15 5 7 4 6
16 III IV III IV
17 0 37.02° 36 65°
18 0 0 0 53.62°
19 7500 7500 x 2 7500 8500
20 2 2 2 2
21 Two way Two Way Two way One way
22 12000 17200 10100 13350
23 - - - -
24 Both side Nil Nil One side
26 2 Nos RCC 3 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC
27 Steel Nil Nil Steel
100
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 30 31
Sub Sl. No. 9 10
Designed by Railway 2 CAO -
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design 4 Structure Setu Consulting
Consultant, Consultant Consultants Pvt Engineers Faridabad
if any Ltd
Proof Consultant 5 - IIT BHU
Drawing Number 6 P-1395-RB/2017 SCE/2015001/ROB/S
UP/005
Whether Designed with 8 Yes No
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jul-19 May-15
Month Year of Approval of 10 Jul-19 May-15
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 On MTC-KRJ Near Noli Railway
Section Station
Girder
Span (m) 13 38.3 43.75
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 49.440° 23
Degree of curvature designed for 18 0 Straight
Direction of road traffic 21 Two Way One way
Deck Width (mm) 22 12000 10350
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Both Side One side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 2 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 RCC One side
Steel/Others)
101
NORTHERN RAILWAY
32 33 34 35
11 12 13 14
1 NSV-NR-CG-11 NSV-NR-CG-12 NSV-NR-CG-13 NSV-NR-CG-14
2 CAO CAO - CAO
3 - - - -
4 Structure Via Pontium Rockwin India RICE Pvt. Ltd.
Consultants Pvt Engineering Consulting
Ltd Services Engineers Pvt Ltd
5 - IIT BHU IIT BHU IIT, BHU
6 P-1395-RB/2017 P-1960-RB/2020 ROB-119/DL1 P-1743-RB/2019
7 No No No No
8 Yes No No Yes
9 Jul-19 Sep-21 Aug-21 Mar-21

10 Jul-19 Sep-21 Aug-21 Mar-21
11 On MTC-KRJ Allahabad- Merut City Rohtak-Meham
Section Prayagraj Section Saharanpur Line
13 48.3 48.8 51.51 52.194
14 2850 2690 3150 3155
15 5 5 6 6
16 IV III III IV
17 49.440° 0 0 65.20°
18 0 0 0 0
19 7500 7500 7500 10000
20 2 2 2 2
22 12000 12000 14500 14500
23 - - - -
24 Both Side Both side Both side Both Side
26 2 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC 2 Nos RCC
27 RCC RCC - Steel
102
NORTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 36 37
Sub Sl. No. 15 16
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-NR-BSG-01 NSV-NR-BSG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design 4 Structure Structure Consultants
Consultant, Consultant Consultants Pvt. Pvt. Ltd.
if any Ltd.
Proof Consultant 5 Jamia Millia NIT Kurukshetra
Islamia
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Feb-19 Feb-19
Month Year of Approval of 10 Feb-19 Feb-19
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Jagraon Pul at Jind-Panipat Section at
Ludhiana on Jind City Stn
SNL-ASR SEC
Type of Superstructure 12 Bowstring Girder Bowstring Girder
Span (m) 13 62 74
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 13500 16000
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 One side Two side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 2 Nos 2 Nos
{Number- Type Type- RCC Type- RCC
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Steel Steel
Steel/Others)
103
NORTHERN RAILWAY
38 39
17 18
1 NSV-NR-BSG-03 NSV-NR-OWG-01
2 CAO CAO
3 - -
4 Structure Consultants Pvt. Ltd. B&S Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
5 Prof. Alok Goyal, IIT Bombay Dr. Dipti Ranjan Sahoo, IIT Delhi
6 P-1125-RB/2016 P-1540-RB/2018
7 No No
8 No No
9 Jun-18 Jun-20
10 Jun-18 Jun-20
11 GZB-SRE section near GZB Rly Between Rly Stn Ghaziabad and
station Maripat
12 Bowstring Girder Truss Girder

13 74.76 113
14 1371 2218 (Approved by RDSO)
15 1 1
16 IV IV
17 0 0
18 0 0
19 9500 15000
20 2 4
21 Two way One way
22 12000 16000
23 - -
24 Nil One Side
25 Both side Nil
26 2 Nos. RCC 2 Nos. RCC
27 Others Steel
104
NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 40 41
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-NER-CG-01 NSV-NER-CG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 UPEIDA NHAI
Name of Design 4 Lea Associate Monte Carlo Ltd
Consultant, Consultant South Asia Pvt. Ltd
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT BHU Civil Baba Infra
Consultant Pvt Ltd
Drawing Number 6 7635G/LASA/STR CICPL/ D1008/
/ROB-01/GA-01 HW/DEG/ROB/02
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Feb-19 Mar-17
Month Year of Approval of 10 Feb-19 Mar-17
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Karimuddinpur- Domingarh to
Dhunadih Jagatbela Gorakhpur
girder girder
Span (m) 13 36 42
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 21250 12500
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Nil One Side
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Nil One Side
Steel/Others)
105
NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY
42
3
1 NSV-NER-CG-03
2 -
3 NHAI
4 Civil Baba Infra Consultant Pvt Ltd
5 NIT Krukshetra
6 CICPL/D1008/HB/002
7 No
8 No
9 Apr. 2017
10 Apr. 2017
11 Gorakhpur Bypas Uttar Pradesh
12 Composite steel girder
13 42
14 2287
15 5
16 IV
17 60
18 0
19 9500
20 2
21 One way
22 12500
23 -
24 One side
25 One side
26 Both side RCC
27 One side
106
107
Sl. No. 43 44
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-NFR-OWG-01 NSV-NFR-BSG-01
Designed by Railway 2 - Dy. CE
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHIDCL PWD.WB.
Name of Design 4 PNG Planning & STUP Consultant Pvt.
Consultant, Consultant Structural Ltd.
if any Consultants
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Guwahati IIT Guwahati
Drawing Number 6 SRIKONA/ROB/N ROB/B/21/2018
HIDCL/SIL/GAD series
Whether Designed with 8 No Yes
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Nov-19 Sep-12
Month Year of Approval of 10 May-20 Jan-18
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Srikona (Silchar) Harishchandrapur
Type of Superstructure 12 Truss girder Bow string girder
Span (m) 13 60 66
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 8500 16000
Deck As per which IRC 23 IRC:SP 73- 2018 -
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Both Side Both side
(Nil/One- (Cantilever)
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Steel Steel
Steel/Others)
108
Sl. No. 45 46
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-NWR-CG-01 NSV-NWR-BSG-01
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI -
Name of Design 4 Strength Engg Spacechem
Consultant, Consultant Service Pvt Ltd. Enterprises
if any Proof Consultant 5 - IIT Krurukshetra
Drawing Number 6 SSE/DFCIL/JP/R CAO/C/JP/6142 TO
OB/ALIGNMENT/ 6154/D-JP
LC-85/GAD/01 ROB/RING ROAD
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jun-14 Jun-18
Month Year of Approval of 10 Jun-14 Jun-18
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Bhagega-Kanwat Shivdaspura-Sananer
CH:104.226)
Type of Superstructure 12 Composite steel Bow string girder
girder
Span (m) 13 36 44
slab (mm)
Seismic Zone designed for 16 - II
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 36 16.43
Deck Width (mm) 22 8500 13400
n Publication No. &
Year
Footpath 24 Nil Nil
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 Nil Nil
Steel/Others)
109
47 48
3 4
1 NSV-NWR-CG-02 NSV-NWR-BSG-02
2 CAO CAO
3 - -
4 C.V.Kand Consultant Spacechem Enterprises
5 Manit Bhopl IIT Krurukshetra
6 CAO/C/JP/7063 TO 7068 /D-ROB CAO/C/JP/6155 TO 6170/D-

DKB ROB/RING ROAD
7 No No
8 No No
9 Sep-19 Jun-18
10 Sep-19 Jun-18
11 Dahar Ka Balaji Kanota (CH:220/8-221/0)
12 Composite girder Bow string girder

13 47.78 100
14 2750 1765
15 5 2
16 II II
17 42.3 56
18 0 0
19 10500 12500
20 3 3
21 One way One way
22 11500 13400
23 - -
24 Nil Nil
25 Nil Nil
27 Nil Nil
110
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 49 50
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-SR-CG-01 NSV-SR-CG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design 4 Ruki Projects Pvt Force Structural
Consultant, Consultant Ltd Engineers
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Madras IIT Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GU1/180/2 CBE/GV2/142/2017
015 Sheet 8 to 13, 21
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-15 Nov-17
Month Year of Approval of 10 Dec-15 May-18
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Maha Madurai - Nagercoil-Tovalai
Aruppukottai
Station
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 15 16.72
slab (mm)
Degree of curvature designed 18 0 0
for
Deck Width (mm) 22 12000 13750
Deck As per which 23 - -
Configuratio IRC Special
n Publication No.
& Year
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing (RCC/ 27 RCC RCC
Steel/Others)
111
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
51 52 53 54
3 4 5 6
1 NSV-SR-CG-03 NSV-SR-CG-04 NSV-SR-CG-05 NSV-SR-CG-06
2 CBE CBE CBE CBE

4 Samarth Infra Rucky Projects Ruki Projects Pvt Ruki Projects Pvt
Engg Ltd Ltd Ltd
5 IIT Madras IIT Chennai IIT Madras IIT Madras
6 CBE/GU1/142 CBE/GU1/161/2 CBE/GU1/165/20 CBE/GU1/162/2
/2010 012 Sheet 18 to 12 012
23,30,32
7 No No No No
8 No No No No
9 Jul-15 Mar-17 Feb-16 May-16

10 Aug-15 Sep-17 Mar-16 May-16
11 Pudukottai- Sudiyur- Sediyar - Parmakkudi-
Vellanur Paramakudi Paramakkudi Sattrakkudi
Station Station
13 17.453 18.66 19.566 20.056
14 1914 1680 1504 1680
15 5 5 5 5
16 II II II II
17 24 45 18 41
18 0 0 0 0
19 8400 9000 9000 9000
20 2 2 2 2
22 12900 12000 12000 12000
23 - - -
24 Both side One side One side One side
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
26 Both side / Both side / RCC Both side / RCC Both side / RCC
RCC
27 RCC RCC RCC RCC
112
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 55 56
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design 4 Force Structural Ruki Projects Pvt Ltd
Consultant, Consultant Engineers
if any
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai IIT/Chennai
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GV2/142/2 CBE/GU1/174/2014
017 Sheet 14 to
21
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Nov-17 Sep-14
Month Year of Approval of 10 May-18 Sep-14
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Nagercoil-Tovalai Madurai-Silaiman Jn
Girder
Span (m) 13 20.32 24.905
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 28 52° 58'
Deck Width (mm) 22 13750 12000
n Publication No. &
Year
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Steel/Others)
113
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
57 58 59 60
9 10 11 12
2 CBE CBE CBE CBE

4 Rucky projects Samarth Infra Ruki Projects Pvt Ruki Projects Pvt
Ltd Engg Ltd Ltd
5 IIT/Chennai IIT Madras IIT Madras IIT Chennai
/2012 Sheet 20 010 12 14
to 26, 34,36
7 No No No No
8 No No No No
9 Jan-17 Jul-15 May-16 Sep-14

10 May-17 Aug-15 May-16 Sep-14
11 Tirupachetti- Pudukottai- Parmakkudi- Silaiman -
Manamadurai Vellanur Station Sattrakkudi Tiruppuvanam Jn
Station Station
13 25.17 26.7 26.74 27.826
14 2039 2276 2055 2039
15 5 5 5 5
16 II II II II
17 42° 33' 24 41 44
18 - 0 0 0
19 9000 8400 9000 9000
20 2 2 2 2
21 One way Two way One way One way
22 12000 12900 12000 12000
23 - - -
24 One side Both side One side One side
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
26 Both side/ RCC Both side / RCC Both side / RCC Both side / RCC
27 RCC RCC RCC RCC
114
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 61 62
Sub Sl. No. 13 14
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design 4 Ruki Projects Pvt Raj Infra Engineers
Consultant, Consultant Ltd
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Madras IIT Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GU1/165/ CBE/GT3/183/2013
2012 Sheet 7 to 17
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Feb-16 Dec-18
Month Year of Approval of 10 Mar-16 Feb-19
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Sediyar - Kurunjipadi-Vadalur
Paramakkudi

Girder
Span (m) 13 29.45 29.745
slab (mm)
Degree of curvature designed for 18 0 -
Deck Width (mm) 22 12000 12000
n Publication No. &
Year
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Steel/Others)
115
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
63 64 65 66
15 16 17 18
2 CBE CBE CBE CBE

4 Rucky Projects Ruki Projects Pvt Rucky Projects Ltd Rucky Projects Ltd
Ltd Ltd
5 IIT Chennai IIT Madras IIT Chennai IIT Chennai
/2012 Sheet 62 015 12 Sheet 84 to 90, 12 Sheet 27 to 33,
to 68 & 93 96 35
7 No No No No
8 No No No No
9 Jun-17 Dec-15 Jun-17 Jan-17

10 Feb-18 Dec-15 Feb-18 May-17
11 Silaiman- Maha Madurai - Silaiman- Tirupachetti-
Tirupavanam Aruppukottai Tirupavanam Manamadurai
Station
13 31.12 32 33.1 34.2
14 2130 2055 2285 2340
15 5 5 5 5
16 II II II II
17 54°15' 0 57 42° 33'
18 Radius of 400m 0 Radius of 400m -
19 9000 9250 9000 9000
20 2 2 2 2
22 12000 12000 12000 12000
23 - - - -
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil

RCC
27 RCC RCC RCC RCC
116
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 67 68
Sub Sl. No. 19 20
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design 4 Rucky Projects Rucky Projects Ltd
Consultant, Consultant Ltd
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Chennai IIT Chennai
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GU1/159/ CBE/GU1/161/2012
2012 Sheet 24 to 29,31
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jun-17 Mar-17
Month Year of Approval of 10 Feb-18 Sep-17
Design
Stations/Locations where used 11 Silaiman- Sudiyur-Paramakudi
Tirupavanam
Girder
Span (m) 13 34.675 35.35
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 58° 43' 45°
Degree of curvature designed for 18 Radius of 400m -
Deck Width (mm) 22 12000 12000
n Publication No. &
Year
(Nil/One-
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Steel/Others)
117
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
69 70 71 72
21 22 23 24
2 CBE CBE CBE CBE

4 Ruki Projects Rucky projects Ruki Projects Pvt Ruki Projects Pvt
Pvt Ltd Ltd Ltd Ltd
5 IIT Madras IIT Chennai IIT Madras IIT Chennai
/2015 012 Sheet 77 to 12 14
83,95
7 No No No No
8 No No No No
9 Dec-15 Jun-17 Apr-16 Sep-14

10 Dec-15 Feb-18 Apr-16 Sep-14
11 Maha Madurai Silaiman- Tiruppuvanam- Madurai-Silaiman

- Aruppukottai Tirupavanam Tiruppavhetti Jn Jn
Station Station
12 Composite Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel
Steel Girder Girder Girder Girder
13 37 38.74 38.97 41.508
14 2445 2556 2550 2751
15 5 5 5 5
16 II II II II
17 0 62°18' 62 52° 58'
18 0 Radius of 400m 0 0
19 9250 9000 9000 9000
20 2 2 2 2
22 12000 12000 12000 12000
23 - - - -
25 Nil Nil Nil Nil
RCC
27 RCC RCC RCC RCC
118
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 73 74
Sub Sl. No. 25 26
whom PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Ruki Projects Pvt Rucky projects Ltd
Consultant, Ltd
if any Proof Consultant 5 IIT Chennai IIT Chennai
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GU1/175/ CBE/GU1/159/2012
2014
Congestion Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Sep-14 Jun-17
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Sep-14 Feb-18
Stations/Locations where used 11 Silaiman - Silaiman-
Tiruppuvanam Tirupavanam
Jn Station
Girder Girder
Span (m) 13 41.739 41.95m
slab (mm)
Degree of curvature designed for 18 0 Radius of 400m
Deck Width (mm) 22 12000 12000
n No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Steel/Others)
119
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
75 76 77 78
27 28 29 30
2 CBE CBE CBE CBE
3 NHAI NHAI NHAI MORTH

4 Mukesh & Ruki Projects Pvt Rucky Projects Ltd Nagesh
Associates Ltd Consultancy
5 IIT Chennai IIT Chennai IIT Chennai IIT Chennai
6 CBE/GU3/162 CBE/GV1/296/2 CBE/GU1/159/20 CBE/GV2/142/20
/2018 016 12 Sheet 69 to 76, 17
94
7 No No No No
8 No No No No
9 Aug-18 Dec-16 Jun-17 Sep-17

10 Aug-18 Nov-17 Feb-18 Sep-17
11 Dindigul- Kochuveli- Silaiman- Alappuzha -
Pollachi SectionThiruvananthapu Tirupavanam Kayamkulam
ram
13 42 45.5 49.67 53
14 2300 2850 3358 2890
15 6 5 5 5
16 II III II III
17 30 32 68° 43' 0
18 0 0 Radius of 400m 0
19 11000 9500 9000 11000
20 3 2 2 2
22 13800 12500 12000 12000
23 - - -
24 One side One side One side Nil
25 Nil One side Nil Nil
RCC
27 Steel RCC RCC Nil
120
121
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 79
Sub Sl. No. 31
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-SR-BSG-01
Designed by Railway (CBE/CAO) 2 CBE
whom PSU 3 NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 RCC Infra Consultants
Consultant, if Proof Consultant 5 -
any
Drawing Number 6 CBE/GJ3/128/2016 Sheet 10 to 36
Whether Fit for Special Vehicle 7 No
Whether Designed with Congestion 8 No
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Jun-16
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Jun-16
Stations/Locations where used 11 Pollachi-Kinathukadavau
Type of Superstructure 12 Bow string girder
Span (m) 13 62
(mm)
Number of Girders in one span 15 1
Seismic Zone designed for 16 II
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 0
Carriageway Width (mm) 19 8000
Number of lanes 20 2
Deck Width (mm) 22 11000
No. & Year
Footpath (Nil/One- 24 One side
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Both side / RCC
{Number- Type (RCC/
W-Beam /Others)}
Railing 27 RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others)
122
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Sl. No. 80 81
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-SECR-CG-01 NSV-SECR-CG-02
whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - -
Name of Design Consultant 4 DECON/Bhopal L&T
Consultant, if Proof Consultant 5 VNIT/NGP IIT Madras
any
Drawing Number 6 AMANKA/ROB/M O15107-C-RP-
GBP/06 RB-RC-0011
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Apr-17 Jul-16
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Apr-17 Jul-16
Stations/Locations where used 11 SZB-URK BTC-JBH-
831/25-27 1195/5-6

girder girder
Span (m) 13 36 36
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 13400 12000
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 One side RCC One side RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others)
123
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
82 83
3 4
1 NSV-SECR-CG-03 NSV-SECR-OWG-01
2 CBE CBE
3 - -
4 L &T Unique Engineers
5 IIT Mumbai NIT Kurukshetra
6 O14043-C-RP-RB-DD-0002 1279/26
7 No No
8 No No
9 Mar-16 Aug-18
10 Apr-16 Aug-18
11 BPH-BRJN 533/17-19 Bilaspur Katni Section
12 Composite steel girder Truss girder

13 41.6 81
14 2295 -
15 6 1
16 II II
17 0 0
18 0 0
19 10500 11000
20 2 2
21 Two way Two Way
22 14800 12000
23 - -
24 Both side Nil
25 Nil Nil
27 Both side Nil
124
125
SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 84 85
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-SWR-CG-01 NSV-SWR-CG-02

whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 - NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Feedback Infra Feedback Infra
Consultant, if
any
Drawing Number 6 ROB/320 SWR/2018/STR-
10/ROB

Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 - -
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 2018 Jul-18
Stations/Locations where used 11 CTA-BHAI Chitradurga-Harihar
Section
girder
Span (m) 13 36 36
slab (mm)
Angle of Skew (Degrees) 17 5° 6‘ 50
Deck Width (mm) 22 16000 16000
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
Kerb (Nil/One- 25 Two side Two side
side/Two-side)
Crash Barrier 26 Two side RCC Two side RCC
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
Railing 27 RCC RCC
(RCC/Steel/Others)
126
WESTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 86 87
Sub Sl. No. 1 2
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-WR-CG-01 NSV-WR-CG-02

whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3 NHAI NHAI
Name of Design Consultant 4 Manthan Setu Manthan Setu Path
Consultant, if Path Engineering and
any Engineering Consultant
and Consultant
Proof Consultant 5 - -
Drawing Number 6 CAO (C ) CAO (C )
CCG/2974B/D- CCG/29749/D-WDHR-
WDHR-MALB MALB
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Oct-21 Nov-21
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Nov-21 Nov-21
Stations/Locations where used 11 MALB-WDHR MALB-INDR
Ahmedabad Ahmedabad
girder
Span (m) 13 30 36
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 17000 17000
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
(RCC/Steel/Others)
127
WESTERN RAILWAY
88 89 90 91
3 4 5 6
1 NSV-WR-CG-03 NSV-WR-CG-04 NSV-WR-CG-05 NSV-WR-OWG-01
2 CBE CAO CBE CBE
3 - - - -
4 Casad Consultant Multimedia Specialized Multi Media
Ahmedabad Consultant Pvt Engineering Consultant,
Ltd Service Pvt Ltd Ahmedabad.
5 SVNIT-Surat SV NIT Surat IIT BHU IIT Mumbai
6 SMC/ROB- CAO( SES/PIL/MUM ROB/CIMS-
445/SUP-40 C)/CCG/29820/ BAI- HOSP/TRUSS_021
D- VG-G/M VADODRA/BR/
201
7 No No No No
8 No No No No
9 Jun-21 Mar-21 Jun-21 Jul-20

10 Jun-21 Mar-21 Jun-21 Jul-20
11 Surat-Udhana Viramgam- Manubar to CIMS Hospital-
(Culvert 445) Mandal-Dasada Sanpa Section Hebatpur Road
KM.265/9-13 Vadodara ADI-VG Section
Mumbai KM.509/7-8
Expressway
12 Composite steel Composite steel Composite steel Truss girder
girder girder girder
13 40 41 44 52.8
14 2400 2545 2556 1100
15 5 6 9 1
16 III III III III
17 0 20 45 0
18 0 0 0 0
19 10350 11000 20250 7500
20 3 3 6 2
22 11250 13800 21250 10300
23 - - - -
24 Nil One side Nil One side
25 Nil One Nil Nil
27 Nil One side Nil One side
128
WESTERN RAILWAY
Sl. No. 92 93
Sub Sl. No. 7 8
Drawing Identification Code 1 NSV-WR-OWG-02 NSV-WR-CG-06

whom (CBE/CAO)
PSU 3
Name of Design Consultant 4 Multi Media Multimedia
Consultant, if Consultant, Consultant Pvt Ltd
any Ahmedabad.
Proof Consultant 5 IIT Mumbai
Drawing Number 6 LC114_ROB_ ROB-SHILAJ-03
DHANDUKA_
TRUSS_01a
Factor
Month/Year of Design 9 Dec-20 Jan-16
Month Year of Approval of Design 10 Dec-20 Feb-16
Stations/Locations where used 11 Bagodara- Thaltej Shilaj
Dhandhuka Road Rancharda Road
KM.126/7 & 126/8 Ahmedabad
IN Lieu OF L.C. NO.
114-B/2-T
Type of Superstructure 12 Truss girder Composite steel girder
Span (m) 13 52.8 64.8
Depth of Girder including deck 14 - -
slab (mm)
Deck Width (mm) 22 10300 10200
No. & Year
side/Two-side)
side/Two-side)
{Number- Type
(RCC/ W-Beam
/Others)}
(RCC/Steel/Others)
129
WESTERN RAILWAY
94 95 96 97
9 10 11 12
1 NSV-WR-OWG-03 NSV-WR-OWG-04 NSV-WR-OWG-05 NSV-WR-OWG-06
2 CBE CBE CBE CAO
3 - - - -
4 STUP Consultants Prof.D.D.Desai- TPF Engineering Casad Consultant
Pvt Ltd Mumbai Mumbai & Pvt Ltd Pvt Ltd
Spectrum Techno
Consultants -
Mumbai
5 IIT Mumbai IIT Roorkee IIT Mumbai IIT Mumbai
6 8040/E/DD-170 WDFC/CPM/ PCE/27676/DRM- AMC/KROB
BRC/LC_NO_150 1-D /RW/S.S/GAD
7 No No No No
8 Yes No Yes No
9 Nov-20 Mar-21 Aug-19 Oct-20

10 Nov-20 Mar-21 Aug-19 Nov-20
11 Vasadva- Sayan- Lower Parel Mani Nagar -
Dhrangdra/KM.618- Gothangam at Station (Delisle) Ahmedabad
13-14 (LC-41 SPL) LC-150
12 Truss girder Truss girder Truss girder Truss girder

13 71.11 71.11 85.09 92
14 1140 1140 - 1000
15 1 1 1 1
16 IV III III III
17 0 0 64.405 0
18 0 0 0 0
19 11000 7500 11000 7500
20 3 2 2 2
21 One way Two way Two way One way
22 12900 8500 13000 10025
23 - - -
25 One Nil Two side One
130
131
Chapter V
Instructions regarding approval of non-RDSO

Drawings
132
133
The latest instructions issued by Railway Board regarding approval of
drawings are being reproduced below for the ready reference:
134
135
Chapter VI
Summary of technical publications issued by RDSO

for execution of ROBs
136
137
6.1 Welded Bridge Code- Indian Railway Standard Code of Practices
for Metal Arc Welding for Structural Steel Bridges carrying Rail
Cum Road or Pedestrian Traffic (Adopted 1972 Revised 2001).
This Code of Practice applies to the design, construction and

inspection of welds made by Manual, Automatic or Semi-automatic
metal arc process in new and existing structural steel bridges.
It broadly covers various types of welds, strengthening of existing

bridges, approval and testing of welding procedures, approval and
testing of welders, sequence of welding, inspection requirements of
welds, acceptable tolerances for welds, etc. This code of practice is
very useful for field engineers involved in fabrication of steel girders as
it can definitely help in their technical understanding of welding
processes and related technical concepts.
138
6.2 Indian Railway Standard Specification for fabrication and
erection of steel girder bridges and locomotive turn-tables (IRS
B1- Adopted 1934, revised 2001)
This Specification is intended mainly to cover technical provisions

relating to fabrication and erection of steel girder bridges, including
supply of the materials through contract or Railway Engineering
Workshops. The provisions cover a wide range of technical topics like
specifications covering grade and quality of steel, fabrication related
technical specifications pertaining to various stages, specification for
bolts, nuts, washers etc., instructions related with camber,
specifications for oiling, sand blasting, metallising, painting of steel
girders, instructions related to weight of steel work for payment,
manufacturing tolerances for girders, tolerances and specifications for
knuckle and roller bearings, specifications for metallising with
sprayed Aluminium for bridge girders and other important
instructions/specifications covering fabrication of girders. Apart from
this it also contains important proforma required for maintaining
records in connection with quality control and inspection.
139
6.3 Guidelines on Fabrication of Steel Girders for Construction/Field
Engineers BS –110 (R1) (December 2011 Revised 2017)
The fabrication of steel girder bridges is being done by various Railway

Workshops as well as through trade. The fabrication is governed by
the provisions of-
i) Indian Railway Standard specification for fabrication and

erection of steel girder bridges and locomotive turn-tables. (B1-
2001).
ii) Indian Railway Standard Code of Practices for metal arc welding
for structural steel bridges carrying rail cum road or pedestrian
traffic (Adopted 1972 Revised 2001).
The officials associated with fabrication work should have thorough

understanding of both the codes i & ii. However, these guidelines have
been prepared for helping the field engineers associated with
execution of the fabrication work. It has been tried to cover various
aspects which require close attention of the field engineers for
ensuring quality of the fabrication work. These guidelines are just to
facilitate and not to supersede the two codes.
140
6.4 Guidelines for Composite Construction Including Stud Shear
Connectors Report No BS 115 (Revision 1 April 2016)
These Guidelines offer a very good understanding on various technical

topics related with composite construction. It broadly covers basic
concepts of composite girders, different types of Shear Connectors,
Automatic Stud Welding process, Stud Welding Equipments, Quality
Assurance Procedure to be adopted for Stud welding and other
important aspects related to above topics. Annexure-I of these
guidelines also provides proforma for Quality Assurance for inspection
of Automatic Stud Welding.
Use of Shear Studs and Automatic Stud Welding are very common
these days. A thorough understanding of the associated technical
concepts and quality assurance aspect can be found in these
guidelines.
141
6.5 Guidelines for Fabrication Inspection of RDSO Standard spans-
Composite I-Section Steel Girders for Road Over Bridges (ROBs)
(BS-130 June 2021)
These guidelines are specially made for fabrication inspection of

composite I-section steel Road Over Bridge (ROB) girders of RDSO
standard spans. The guidelines aim to provide clear understanding of
fabrication as-well-as approval related aspects to the field executives.
The guidelines also contain standard QAP (Quality Assurance Plan)
which can be used to avoid repetitive preparation and subsequent
approval in each case. It also contains standard proforma for WPSS
(Welding Procedure Specification Sheet) and WPQR (Welding
Procedure Qualification Record).
Off late many Railway PSUs like RVNL, DFCCIL, IRCON etc. and many
Non-Railway PSUs like NHAI, NHIDCL etc. have started
manufacturing steel girders. There was a lack of clarity regarding clear
understanding of roles to be performed by Railway and these PSUs at
various stages of fabrication. These guidelines contain a schedule for
inspection and approval of these girders in all such cases. It is
attached as Annexure-II of this guideline.
142
6.6 Guidelines for use of High Strength Friction Grip (HSFG) Bolting
Assemblies on bridges on Indian Railways (BS-111 Adopted June
2012, 6th Revision May 2019)
Provision of High Strength Friction Grip (HSFG) bolts has been made
mandatory in Bridge Works of Railways. It helps in faster construction
and erection of bridges as compared to riveted girders. RDSO had
issued guideline no. BS-111 to understand basic functioning and
basic technical concepts related with HSFG bolts. This guideline has
been revised 6 times to incorporate the latest provisions related to
HSFG bolts.
The latest revision of BS-111 (R6) provides for HSFG bolting

assemblies aligned with best international practices. Mandatory
provision of Direct Tension Indicator (DTI) washer has been made to
avoid any subjectivity in achieving full designed tension in these bolts.
It also contains provisions for proper tightening procedures, checking
tightened bolts, corrosion protection measures etc.
143
Chapter VII
Instructions regarding launching of girders
144
145
7.1 Introduction:
7.1.1 Launching of ROB girders basically involves all the operations
involved in assembling, putting the assembled girders in position over
pier caps and lowering of girders to their final position over bearings.
7.1.2 As discussed earlier, ROBs are constructed in lieu of Level Crossings

where road traffic is very high. Generally space constraints are there
for assembling the full girder, erecting temporary supports and to
perform the related operations. Since neither track nor road can be
blocked for assembly of girders therefore it becomes very important to
follow all possible safety measures while preparing the girder for
launching and erecting temporary arrangements for launching. Any
mistake can be fatal from human safety point of view. Therefore
launching of girders over Railway Tracks is a very challenging and
complicated procedure involving many operations which are to be
performed with utmost precision so as to ensure full safety of Road
users as well as Railway passengers.
Fig 1 Photo: View of Bow String Arch Girder during construction stage (Park
Circus station of Eastern Railway)
146
Fig 2 Photo: View of Bow String Arch Girder from Railway Station during
construction stage (Park Circus station of Eastern Railway)
7.2 General requirements for launching of ROB girders over railway

tracks
i. CRS sanctions should be obtained for launching scheme of
girder.
ii. Traffic and power blocks are to be arranged for erection of steel
girder over Railway Track.
iii. Track is to be protected in accordance with relevant clauses of

Indian Railways P. Way Manual.
iv. Pulling/ launching of the girder shall be stopped in case wind

speed at site exceeds 15 kmph and it shall be made sure that
weather conditions are normal and visibility is clear.
147
v. Level & compact the ground as per requirement for assembly of
trestle, girder & movement of crane on launching end side.
vi. Arrange material, crane, cribs/ trestle, 2 pulling winches & 2

restraining winches of sufficient capacity, wire rope of suitable
grade etc. for execution of work.
vii. Safety net shall be provided under the girders while fixing the
bracing and shuttering work.
viii. Clearance from Railway Track to be maintained in accordance

with Indian Railway Schedule of Dimensions for Broad Gauge.
ix. Protect the site of work for any trespass of any living beings.
x. Ground at the location of trestle pedestal should be compacted

to attain safe bearing capacity of soil. Field engineer should
certify that SBC of soil is more than foundation pressure at
foundation level.
xi. Launching Track should be laid in correct alignment & level on

trestles for longitudinal slewing of girder.
xii. Speed restriction of 20 kmph is to be imposed before start of

work & will be continued up to completion of work.
xiii. Skid plate surface for skidding arrangement shall be

smoothened by lubrication. It shall be ensured by field engineer,
that there should be no gaps in skid plate, which should be
closed by welding & smoothened by grinding.
xiv. Before launching of girder, it must be ensured that fabrication

of girder and its inspection have been done as per approved QAP
(Quality Assurance Plan) & WPSS (Welding Procedure
Specification Sheets).
xv. All steel to steel member will be connected with tack weld to
avoid any longitudinal & transverse movement.
148
xvi. Pulling arrangement shall be trial tested with actual load well
before taking traffic and power block.
xvii. Fabrication of BSG shall be done after locking the skidding

arrangement with suitable method. Locking shall also be done
after each stage of pulling to prevent from skidding.
xviii. The condition of crane shall be strictly observed in the light of

Railway Board letter no. 2015/CE-IV/RUB/206 dated
15.02.2015 and other instructions issued from time to time.
xix. Any activity near or over existing railway track shall be

performed under traffic & power block.
7.3 Composite Steel Plate Girders:

7.3.1 Assembly of composite girder leaves at site
7.3.1.1 General: Composite Plate girders are fabricated in convenient
lengths to suit transportation and availability of plate lengths. In
general, the length is restricted to about 12m to 13m so as to
facilitate transport in single lengths.
7.3.1.2 Erection of composite plate girders: Normally a composite girder
ROB is comprised of multiple composite I-Girder placed at certain
spacing. Camber may or may not be provided in these girders.
Assembly of pieces of girders transported to site should be done
according to the camber provided in the drawing. Girders are
erected on a level ground over the platform made up of compacted
earth or concrete base. Over this, sleeper or timber pickings at
suitable intervals are laid for laying the main members for
assembly. After they are laid, levelled and aligned, splicing plates
are fixed. Joint holes are partially filled with drifts for bringing
them into proper alignment. Provision of HSFG bolts in the splice
joints of composite girder should be done in accordance with the
procedure given in IRS B1-2000 for this purpose. All girder leaves
of composite girder span should be assembled in field according to
the approved drawing as mentioned above.
149
7.3.1.3 Choice of a suitable method of girder erection
Several methods are available for girder erection. The following
factors generally influence the suitability of a particular erection
method:
(a) Particulars of Bridge and spans:
i) Length, width, height, & weight of girder.
ii) Number and type of spans.
iii) Height and width of piers and abutments
iv) Skew or square span.
(b) Site conditions:
i) Height of gap.
ii) Condition of approaches- high or low banks or cuttings.
(c) Access to site
(d) Availability of bridging equipment/ launching equipments such as

cranes, etc.
7.3.2 Preliminary arrangements before girder erection: Site conditions
should be carefully studied by visiting the site and noting all the
relevant facts before preparing erection schemes. Cross sections of the
site and various important levels should be taken. Before embarking
on preparation of the scheme, a thorough knowledge of the site
conditions as mentioned above should be known.
The following arrangements should be made before actual

launching work is started:
a) Plan the sequence of erection work.
b) Move the girder materials to the site.
c) Assembly of girders as per approved drawings
d) Decision regarding capacity and number of cranes to be deployed

according to various site conditions.
e) Arrange the plant and equipment necessary to carry out the

work along with spares.
150
f) Preparation of ground for proper working of cranes being used in
launching of girders.
g) Test all the equipment to be used in the erection work.
h) First Aid and communication arrangement at site.
i) Arrange for consumable stores.
j) Arrange for necessary traffic blocks.
k) Arrange for a proper organisation with Supervisors, Skilled and

Unskilled Staff.
l) Provide facilities for the large labour force that will be employed at
site.
7.3.3 Erection by use of cranes: This is the most popular method for
launching of the composite plate girders ROBs. Composite plate
girders can be placed in position with the help of cranes. Tentative
sequence of launching operations is given below:
a) The assembled girders of ROBs, to be brought near the crane as
near as possible.
b) Lifting hooks as per approved launching scheme to be placed in
leaves of girder prior to start of traffic block.
c) Infringements/ obstacles in launching of girder to be removed
before traffic block as far as possible e.g. overhead electrical wires
to be grounded or lowered during power block.
d) One or two cranes, as per approved launching scheme is used for
lifting the leaf of assembled composite girder at site. Girder lifted by
crane is then moved across the railway track and avoiding
infringement/ damage to overhead electrical wires. Lifted girder is
gradually lowered in position on blocks placed for this purpose.
e) The placed girder should be properly secured with adjacent girders
or with some other suitable arrangement as per approved
launching scheme. Securing of girder is one of the most important
operations to ensure safety of girder and to avoid its toppling/
falling. Crane should not be removed from the girder unless it is
151
properly secured.
f) Girders should be placed in sequence as per the approved
launching scheme. If launching of girder is planned from two places
then middlemost girder is launched first and thereafter launching
of girders from middle to end is done. If launching is done from one
place then farthest side girder from crane is launched first and
thereafter launching from farthest side girder to nearest side girder
is done. However, this might change as per other site condition and
sequence of launching should be decided beforehand in approved
launching scheme.
g) After completion of placing, lowering and securing of all girders
in position, the cranes should be removed to avoid any
infringement to track.
h) To restore the position of track, overhead electrical wires and any
other facility which were removed for launching of girder should
be restored before clearing block section for movement of traffic.
(a) Photo: Assembled girders to be (b) Photo: Lifting of girder with lifting
brought near the crane hook
152
(c) Photo: Lifting of girder (d) Photo: Crossing of girder across
track
(e) Photo: Placing of girder in (f) Photo: Placing of all girders in

position position, secured in place
Fig. 3: Sequence of operations in launching of composite plate girders by

crane
7.4 Bow String Arch Steel Girders:

7.4.1 Girder assembly at site:
a) It shall be ensured that before starting launching of the BSG all
the steel components of the girder are well assembled and welded.
No launching is to start without ensuring that all the components
are properly welded.
153
b) Such assembly of BSG is typically done over temporary
arrangements like trestles, longitudinal beams, skidding
arrangements and cranes etc.
c) Normally this activity is planned in such a way that it does not

infringe the tracks and generally no traffic/ power blocks are
required to complete this activity.
(a) Photo: Erecting temporary (b) Photo : Start of assembly of

arrangements Bottom Beam, Top Chord, Hangers
and Cross Girders
(c) Photo: Completing the sequence (d) Photo: Completing the assembly
from one end to the other of Bow String Girder
Fig. 4: Sequence of operations in assembling a typical Bow String Arch
girder
7.4.2 Launching:
a) Most preferred method of launching BSGs is End Launching
method with winch machines. In this method BSG is first
154
assembled over temporary arrangements like trestles and
longitudinal beams. Thereafter girder is pulled to its final location
with the help of pulling and restraining winches. Thereafter girder
is lowered gradually in steps over the bearings.
b) Bow String Girders are typically suitable for lifting also. Such
information is clearly mentioned in the approved drawings. The
lifting points are clearly mentioned.
c) The overhang for which design of BSG has been checked is

clearly mentioned in the drawings. Typically, the BSGs are
checked for 50% overhang. The launching scheme involving
overhang should be planned only after suitably confirming the
overhang length for which BSG had been designed and checked.
7.4.3 Explanatory notes on End Launching Sequence with a typical

illustration:
Fig. 5: Typical launching of a Bow String Arch girder

a) This method is most popular and most widely used for launching
of Bow String Girders.
b) Once the girder is assembled over temporary structures, the

girder is ready for the next stage.
c) In following pages a typical launching and lowering scheme has

been shown for understanding and guidance purpose. It does not
dictate any instruction or obligation in any sense. Each BSG
launching case to have its own approved Temporary Arrangement
155
Drawings and Launching/ Lowering schemes. This launching
scheme needs to be approved by CRS in each case.
d) One typical case is being discussed in following paragraphs for

illustration purpose only. The arrangements shown in blue
represent temporary arrangements. The details below have been
taken from launching scheme of a BSG over Level crossing no.
67/C at Railway km 638/7-9 between stations Dhanaichha and
Durgauti on MGS-GAYA section and at Road km 88191 of Village
Road from GT Road to Karmnasha village.
STAGE -1
a) Mark the centre line of girder on abutments, Pedestals & on ground.
b) Mark the position of trestle on the ground as per approved drawings.
c) Cast/place foundation pads for trestles at appropriate locations as per

approved structural drawings.
d) Erect trestles on foundation pads as per approved structural drawings

of trestles. Place steel stools/packing beams on trestles & place
temporary longitudinal beam on trestle.
Fig 6: Elevation and Plan of Launching Stage-1
156
STAGE - 2
a) Assemble Bow String Steel Girder on longitudinal beams including X-
girders along with the skidding arrangement with suitable thickness
of wooden blocks under the bottom chord so that skidding
arrangement can properly rest on rails.
b) Provide hard wood packs & skid arrangement on nodal points at the
location of hangers.
c) Keep the girders in correct plumb & alignment, avoiding infringement

to IRSOD (Indian Railways Schedule Of Dimensions) of broad gauge.
d) Complete the welding work in all respect to assemble the Bow String
Steel Girder.
e) Fix pulling winches & restraining winches at their respective

locations.
157
STAGE-3 (WITH TRAFFIC AND POWER BLOCK):
a) Erect trestles further, over which the temporary girder is to be laid

just above the railway track and place stool/packing beams on them.
b) Place temporary beam over these Trestles with the help of crane along
the direction of road over bridge.
c) Cross pulling wire from pulling end to another end and secure
properly.
d) Test check the temporary arrangement for its proper functioning &
stability.
STAGE 3A (TESTING):
a) Before pulling the BSG, it will be ensured that skidding arrangement

is under each vertical nodal point of longitudinal bottom chord of
BSG.
b) Then, after ensuring stability of the arrangement pull the Bow String
Girder by 3.0m with the help of pulling winches & releasing the
restraining winches.
Fig 8: Elevation and Plan of Launching Stage-3, 3A
158
STAGE - 4
a) Pull the BSG with the help of pulling winches & releasing the
restraining winches up to the last trestle in stages.
b) Utmost care needs to be taken to arrest any undesired skidding.
c) Proper securing arrangements should be in place at all times during

the performance of these operations.
STAGE – 5 (FINAL POSITION OVER PIERS)
a) Continue pulling the girders with the help of pulling winches and
releasing the restraining winches, up to the pier location.
b) Presently all the temporary arrangements like longitudinal beams,

trestles and CC Cribs etc. are in place.
159
c) Now the girder is successfully placed at the final location over piers.
Now after supporting the girder over piers, next operations related to
lowering of girder can be started.
Fig 11: Typical section of Skidding Arrangement

160
7.4.4 Illustration of launching through photographs:
(a) Photo: Erection of temporary (b) Photo: Erection of temporary

arrangements- Trestles arrangements- Longitudinal Beams
(c) Fixing longitudinal beams and (d) Photo: Completing Temporary

Trestles arrangements for launching
(e) Photo: Fixing Winch and rope (f) Photo: Launching of BSG over
assemblies temporary arrangements
161
(g) Photo: Bringing BSG to its final location over piers
Fig.12: Photos illustrating various steps involved in launching of Bow String

arch Girder (LC no. 67/Cat km. 638/7-9 between stations Dhanaichha and
Durgauti in MGS-GAYA section)
7.4.5 Explanatory notes on Lowering operations with a typical

illustration:
STAGE - 1
a) Currently the girder is longitudinally in its final location.
b) Presently all the temporary arrangements like longitudinal beams,

trestles and CC Cribs etc. are in place.
Fig 13: Elevation and Plan of Lowering, Stage-1

162
STAGE - 2
a) Provide jacks below end cross girders.
b) Jacking points are shown in the drawings and stiffener plates are
provided inside of these End Cross Girder at these locations to
support the point loads of jacks.
STAGE - 3
a) Lift Bow String Girder using jacks below end cross girder.
b) Remove temporary beams & rolling arrangement with help of Jacks &
Cranes.
c) Remove trestle with help of Cranes.
d) Provide hard wood packs below bottom chords on piers in sequential

manner and equally at all bearing locations.
163
STAGE - 4
a) Lower the girders with the help of jacks sequentially. The lowering
needs to be done in steps say 25mm in one step and then check the
level & alignment after each step on all four bearing locations. It will
help in arresting the twist.
b) Fix the bearing & grout the Anchor Bolts of bearing after ascertaining
correct position & level of bearing.
c) Final lowering of BSG on bearings.
d) Arrange to cast the deck slab as per approved drawings.
e) Correct alignment & level on bridge as well as in approaches.
f) Remove all the material provided for launching of girder and clear the
site.
g) The BSG is now successfully placed at in its final location.
164
Fig 17: Jacking arrangement at pier location

165
7.4.6 Typical Lowering arrangement photographs:
(a) BSG positioned over piers with (b) Supporting of BSG over piers
temporary arrangements in place and removal of beams
(c) Supporting of BSG over piers and (d) Clearing of site after removal
removal of beams continued of all ground arrangement
(a) Photo: Arrangement of temporary (b) Photo: Jacking arrangement

support for lowering below End Cross Girder
Fig 18: Photos illustrating lowering arrangements of Bow String Arch Girder
(LC no. 67/Cat km. 638/7-9 between stations Dhanaichha and Durgauti in
MGS-GAYA section)
166
167
Annexures
168
169
Annexure-I
170
171
Annexure-II
172
173
INNER PAGE OF BACK COVER
(BLANK)
174
175

Compendium For ROB by Indian Railway

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Compendium For ROB by Indian Railway

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Compendium For ROB by Indian Railway

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BACK OF COVER PAGE

Bridge & Structures Directorate

Sl. Description Page No.

3 Chapter I Introduction 1-6

4 Chapter II Planning of Road Over Bridges (ROBs) 7-24

5 Chapter III List of Drawings suitable for Special 25-80

6 Chapter IV List of drawings for other than Special 81-130

7 Chapter V Instructions regarding approval of non- 131-134

8 Chapter VI Summary of technical publications 135-142

9 Chapter VII Instructions regarding launching of 143-166

10 Annexures 1- Railway Board‘s instruction regarding 167-171

1.2 Proposals for construction of ROBs in lieu of level crossings are

Fig. c): Bow String Arch Steel Girder

IRC SP:73-2018 Manual of Specifications and Standards for

IRC SP:84-2019 Manual of Specifications and Standards for

IRC SP:87-2019 Manual of Specifications and Standards for

IRC 5-2015 Standard Specifications and Code Of Practice

IRC 6-2017 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice

IS 800-2007 General Construction in Steel — Code of

IRC SP:69-2011 Guidelines and Specifications for Expansion

IRC 22-2015 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice

IRC 24-2010 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice

IRC 83 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice

IRC 112-2020 Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges.

IS 2062-2011 Hot Rolled Medium and High Tensile

IS 816-1969 Code of Practice for use of Metal Arc Welding

IS 1786-2008 High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires

IRC:78 - IRC 78-2014 Road Bridges Foundation and Substructure

IRC SP:105 Explanatory Handbook to IRC:112 Code of

IS 2911 - Design and Construction of Pile Foundations

Note: Readers are advised to always refer latest version of

1.7 For guidance of field engineers involved in Steel Girder Fabrication,

Planning of Road Over Bridges (ROBs)

2.2 Planning Layout of piers and planning span lengths:

2.4 Planning of sub structure: Normal construction methodology

2.5 Planning of girders:

2.6 Skew arrangement:

Axis of ROB ROB

Figure 1 Defining Skew Angle α

Figure 2 Normal method of providing skew spans

2.6.4 Advantages of reducing skew angles:

a) It is easier to provide the square alignment girders and

b) Behaviour of skew girders under seismic loads is inferior to

2.6.5 Methods for reducing skew angles (Providing square girders, if

A. Providing longer spans: If space constraint is not there,

Figure 3 Skew alignment made square by providing longer span.

b) The piers are not parallel to railway land boundary. So if the

c) Standard design of longer span required, if not available, the

B. Constructing sub structure in skew to railway land boundary: It

Skew angle is more if piers made Skew angle reduced by making

Figure 4 On left: Normally provided skew girder; On right: Skew sub

b) The skew piers can violate the Schedule of Dimensions of

C. Constructing Skew bed block: Land is a precious resource and

Figure 5 Arrangement with pier cap in skew

Figure 6 Arrangement with pockets to accommodate girders

E. Providing fish bellied girders: Another method for increasing

Fish Bellied girder

Figure 7: Cross sectional view of a fish bellied girder

Disadvantage: Fish bellied girders are slightly difficult to