Cal Prop 65 Introduction

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

California Proposition 65

An Introduction

TUV Rheinland
California Proposition 65

Table of Contents

 What is California Proposition 65?


 Which chemicals are included?
 How are the restrictions defined?
 How to check if labelling is required?
 How is Cal Prop 65 enforced?
 What are the recent settlements about?
 What is the impact of the law?
 What is the outlook of the law?
 How TUV Rheinland can help me comply with Cal Prop 65?

2 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

What is California Proposition 65?

 What is Cal Prop 65?

- Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986

- Originally intended to protect drinking water sources from chemicals known to


cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, and to inform citizens
about exposures to such chemicals

- Businesses need to notify Californians about significant amounts of chemicals in


products, their homes, workplaces or that are released into the environment

- Only businesses with 10 or more employees need to comply

3 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

Which chemicals are included?

 Approx. 950 chemicals that are known to

- cause cancer or birth defects or


- other reproductive harm

 List of substances can be downloaded

- Includes links to basis for listing or risk assessment of Safe Harbour Levels for
some of the substances
- http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/Newlist.html

4 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

Which chemicals are included?

 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)


- Part of California Environmental protection Agency (EPA)
- OEHHA’s advisory board
- Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC)
- Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant (DART) Identification Committee

 How chemicals are included


- Identification by CIC or DART or
- Identification by an designated “authoritive body“ (e.g. EPA, FDA, NIOSH, National
Institute for Research on Cancer) or
- State or federal agency is requiring labeling (e.g. FDA requires drugs to contain
warnings relating to cancer or birth defects) or
- Identified in the California Labor Code as causing cancer or reproductive harm

5 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How are the restrictions defined?

 Exposure
- Restrictions are given as daily exposure levels
- ‘Expose’: to ingest, inhale, contact via body surfaces or otherwise come into
contact with a listed chemical.
- Presence of listed chemical not automatically harmful

 Safe Harbour Level


 Until now 300 out of the 950 chemicals have an established Safe Harbour Level

 Chemicals with no Safe Harbour Level

6 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How are the restrictions defined?

Safe Harbour Level

Carcinogenic Reproductive
Chemicals harmful Chemicals

NSRL MADL
No significant risk level Maximum allowable dose
levels
Level of exposure result in not more
than one case of cancer in 100,000 Toxicological “ No observable effect
individuals level (NOEL) “ devided by margin of
safety 1000

7 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How are the restrictions defined?

 Safe Harbour Level vs material‘s content of a chemical


Safe Harbour Level Material‘s content of a chemical
Definition Daily intake of the chemical per Amount (percentage) of the chemical
individual within the material
Expressed as Amount of chemical/day Weight of chemical/weight of materials

Example DEHP Safe Harbour Level: DEHP Restriction within a material:


410 µg/day (oral intake) 0.1 % or 1000 ppm

 How to convert?
- Apply toxicological assessment taking into account
- Product’s formulation
- Routes of exposure – oral, inhalation, transdermal or hand-to-mouth
- Level of exposure ...in a worst case scenario
...in a worst case scenario

8 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

When Labelling is required?

9 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How to check if labelling is required?

 Chemicals with established Safe Harbour Level


- A chemicals‘ concentration exceeding the Safe Harbour Level needs to be labelled

 Chemicals with no established Safe Harbour Level


- Toxicological assessment to check if the anticipated exposure level will pose a
significant risk of cancer or reproductive harm
- Guidance within Article 7 and Article 8 of Title 27, California Code of
Regulations

10 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How to check if labelling is required?

 Toxicological Assessment
Review composition of
product’s all different
materials against Prop 65
chemical list

Contains Chemical of No further action


NO
Concern required

YES

Define Exposure Check amount in material Compare against limits


of related products in
respective lawsuits (if
available)
Established Safe No established Safe
Harbor Level Harbour Level

Define Safe Harbour


Below: Above: Levels by use of
No Label Label toxicological date
(NSRL, MADL)

11 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How to check if labelling is required?

 Risk orientated approach


- Test chemicals in high-risk materials for products which are commonly target of
lawsuits
- Compare to limits in related law-suits

 Preventative labelling of the product without investigation about chemical’s presence


- Might violate FTCs premise of true claims
- Information concerning the actual hazard need to be provided to the public on
request
- Might prevent customers from buying the product

 Ignore and hope to not get targeted

 No sale in California

12 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How is Cal Prop 65 enforced?

 Public Enforcement
- Filing of a lawsuit by California Attorney General's Office, district or city attorneys

 Private Enforcement
- Filing of a lawsuit by any individual acting in the public interest
- Requires 60-days notice

13 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How is Cal Prop 65 enforced?

 60-day notice
- Enables law enforcement officials to investigate a notice and to decide if they
should persue the action in lieu of private enforcement
- Provides violator an opportunity to cure of violation and cut off continuing penalties
- Government prosecutors such as the Attorney General and District Attorney may
file Proposition 65 enforcement lawsuits without serving a 60-day notice

 Penalties
- Can be as high as $2,500 per violation per day

14 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

What are the recent settlements about?

 Amount of settlements and their payments

700 $35,000,000 2014:


600 $30,000,000
71 % Attorney’s Fees
500 $25,000,000

400 $20,000,000 17 % Civy Penalty


300 $15,000,000
12 % Other
200 $10,000,000

100 $5,000,000

0 $0
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Amount of Settlements Total Settlements Payments

15 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

What are the recent settlements about?

 Typcical Chemicals and Product Categories


- Lead
- Plastic (e.g. footware, stationary, etc.)
- Paint and surface coatings (e.g. Toys, Furniture)
- Textile materials (e.g. Apparel, bags)
- Metal materials (e.g. Jewellery)
- Food Contact Materials (Ceramic Ware, Aluminium Cookware, Espresso
Machines)
- Cosmetics and Dietary Supplements

- Phthalates
- Soft plastic materials (e.g. Toys, childrens products, footware, cable cords)
- Coatings and laminations (e.g. Apparel, books with PVC cover)

16 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

What are the recent settlements about?

- Flame Retardants
- Upholstered furniture, cushions

- Cadmium
- Paint and surface coatings (e.g. Bicylcles)
- Food Contact Materials (e.g.Glass and Ceramicware)
- Dietary supplements

- Toluene
- Chemical preparations (e.g. Sprays, Sealers, Oil removers)

- Formaldehyde
- Apparel

17 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

What is the impact of the law?

 “Bounty-hunters“
- Citizens or organizations are awarded one-quarter of the civil penalty paid by a
business found in violation
- Majority of businesses opt to settle lawsuits out of court rather than going through
the expensive and time consuming process of a trial

 Over-use of warning labels


- To avoid lawsuites and associated costs businesses tend to label products even
when listed substances are not present or below Safe Harbour Level
- Decreasing sensitivity of consumers

 No impact on public health


- Research has shown no decrease in incidences of cancer in California

18 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

What is the outlook of the law?

 OEHHA publishes a list of chemicals under consideration to be added to the list and
allows public to comment on

- Styrene
- Considered as a carcinogenic
- PS-Foam for industrial use, food contact
- Molded PS for casings

- Pentachlorphenol
- Considered as a carcinogenic
- Wood preservative

- http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/CRNR_notices/admin_listing/abtracking.html, e.g.

19 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

How TUV Rheinland can help me comply with Cal Prop 65?

 Toxicological Assessment
- Submission of materials composition data to a certified toxicologist
- Identification of Cal Prop 65 listed hazardous chemicals
- Test of chemical content within the respective materials in our labs
- Evaluation of actual exposure level by a certified toxicologist OR
- Comparison to limits set up be recent related lawsuits (if available)

 Risk orientated approach


- Identification of risk materials
- Review of established lawsuits
- Testing acc. to indicated Cal Prop 65 test methods
- Assessment of warning label need based on the test result

20 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland


California Proposition 65

Questions?

21 01/01/2016 TUV Rheinland

You might also like